Consistent EMG encoding during reach and grasp by neurons in motor cortex

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,634 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Identifying what the activity of neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1) represents is essential for understanding motor computation. Yet the relation of M1 to muscles and movement remains unresolved, in part because the kinematic variables M1 appears to encode differ across the limb: hand velocity during reaching, but joint position during grasping. This discrepancy has been taken to imply fundamentally distinct control strategies for proximal and distal segments. Yet, here we show that a single, muscle-based control principle accounts well for both observations. We recorded neural activity, electromyographic (EMG) signals, and movement kinematics from macaque monkeys performing planar reaching, wrist movement, or free-form grasping tasks. Across behaviors, EMG-based encoding models explained M1 firing rates as accurately as the best-performing kinematic model: velocity for reaching, position for grasping, and either variable for wrist movements. Impulse response analysis revealed that these task-dependent kinematic relationships arise from the differences in mechanical impedance of each limb segment: the inertial and intersegmental coupling which dominate the dynamics of the proximal arm are far less important in the hand. These findings indicate that M1 output has a relatively simple, consistent relation to muscle activation and that the apparent divergence in kinematic encoding is a consequence of limb mechanics rather than distinct cortical strategies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Figure conversion had problems on the first submission

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00