Pollen contaminated with a triple-action fungicide induced oxidative stress and reduced bee longevity though with less impact on lifespan in bees from well fed colonies

Pollen contaminated with a triple-action fungicide induced oxidative stress and reduced bee longevity though with less impact on lifespan in bees from well fed colonies | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Pollen contaminated with a triple-action fungicide induced oxidative stress and reduced bee longevity though with less impact on lifespan in bees from well fed colonies Thais Alves, Matheus Trivellato, Tainá Freitas, Aline Kato, Cássia Gomes, and 10 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4836495/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract There is increasing evidence that besides insecticides, fungicides also affect bee health. However, there has been little research on how bees are affected by recently developed modern fungicides that contain various active ingredients to help overcome fungal pathogen resistance. Experiments were conducted to determine how this type of fungicide affects bees and whether annutritional supplements can ameliorate eventual negative impacts for bees. Newly-emerged bees from well fed and from nutritionally restricted honey bee colonies were maintained in groups of 20 in plastic cages in an incubator and fed for five days with pollen from sunflower plants that had been sprayed or not during flowering with a three-component commercial fungicide containing bixafen, prothioconazole and trifloxystrobin. Bees from the well-fed colonies were significantly larger and consumed more uncontaminated pollen in the cage tests. They also had increased glutathione peroxidase activity and higher concentrations of pyridine nucleotides. Feeding on the fungicide-contaminated pollen resulted in decreased catalase activity of bees from well-fed colonies and damage to cell membranes of bees indepent of nutritional condition. Bee longevity was reduced by both fungicide contamination of the pollen diet and poor nutritional condition of the donor colony. In conclusion, the triple action commercial fungicide adversely affected bees fed with contaminated pollen, though nutritional supplementation of bee colonies that provided the bees partially compensated for these effects. bixafen nutrition prothioconazole redox trifloxystrobin Figures Figure 1 Introduction Bees play a vital role in pollination, contributing to agricultural production and maintenance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems (Potts et al. 2018). Concerns about the health and longevity of bees have grown, with various factors being associated with the decline of these natural insect pollinator populations (Hernández et al. 2021 ). The honey bee ( Apis mellifera ) is a managed crucial pollinator of crops worldwide, frequently exposed to various pesticides, especially in crop fields (Poquet et al. 2016 ). When visiting sprayed crops or other areas affected by pesticide drift, bees can become contaminated. The damage may increase when two pesticides are applied together or when a product with more than one active ingredient is used, as is the case with some modern fungicides (Böhme et al. 2017 ; Prado et al. 2019 ; Rondeau and Raine, 2022 ). Fungicides are generally considered to have low toxicity for bees based on acute toxicity tests; however, fungicides provoke behavioral (Tadei et al. 2019 ), cellular (Batista et al. 2020 ), microbial (Carneiro et al. 2020 ), and immunological changes (Cizelj et al. 2016 ) in bees. Additionally, they can reduce food consumption (Cizelj et al. 2016 ; Liao et al. 2017 ; Mao et al. 2017 ) and bee longevity (Fisher et al. 2017 . Given the stress on bee health resulting from fungicide exposure, it is pertinent to consider the nutritional condition of colonies in agricultural landscapes, especially since a deficient diet negatively affects the ability of bees to deal with pathogens and toxins (Fisher et al. 2023 ). A deficiency in pollen availability can result in a reduced colony population and compromise the health of the bees, decreasing resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses at individual and colony levels (Corona et al. 2023 ; Fisher et al. 2023 ). In a scenario of intensive pesticide use and landscapes with spatial and temporal limitations on food resources for bees, nutritional support for these beneficial insects should be considered with increased attention, as it is crucial for their development and survival and is intrinsically linked to their resilience against numerous stressors, including pesticides (Wickramasinghe et al. 2020 ; Quinlan and Grozinger, 2023 ). Moreover, a better understanding of the interaction between nutrition, pesticide exposure, and the functioning of the antioxidant system in bees is essential, considering impairments to bee health that impact their behavior, productive performance, oxidative metabolism, and longevity (Tong et al. 2019 ; Fisher et al. 2023 ). A triple-action fungicide, containing the active ingredients bixafen, prothioconazole, and trifloxystrobin, is now commonly used in large-scale agricultural productions, including cotton, sunflower, and soybeans (Bayer, 2019 ). These crops are visited by bees for pollen and/or nectar, and crop yields are benefitted by entomophilous pollination (Klein et al. 2007 ). However, little is known about the isolated and combined effects of these active ingredients on bee health, especially the oxidative metabolism of nurse honey bees. Increases in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) or failures in the antioxidant defense system lead to oxidative stress, a state detrimental to cellular homeostasis. Defenses against oxidative stress operate through enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as non-enzymatic components, which can be obtained endogenously or from natural or artificial food sources (Sies et al. 2017 ). Nutritional stress has been identified as one of the factors that harm bee health and longevity, while non-enzymatic antioxidants present in high-quality diets can assist in the antioxidant defenses of bees (Mucci et al. 2021 ; Corona et al. 2023 ). In this study, we evaluated whether nutritional supplementation of colonies can mitigate the harmful effects on the oxidative system and longevity resulting from the exposure of adult bees to protein food contaminated with a modern triple-component fungicide. Material and methods Experiment location, sunflower cultivation, fungicide application, and pollen collection The experiment was conducted in Dracena, state of São Paulo, at 21°27'33" South Latitude and 51°33'22" West Longitude, with an altitude of 392 meters. This study involved the use of two nutritional management practices for honey bee colonies to obtain bees that developed under different conditions regarding food availability during their brood stage. Bees were obtained from these colonies and maintained in groups of 20 in small cages in an incubator, where they were fed with protein paste based on sunflower pollen from plants that were treated or not treated with a commercial fungicide. The CATI Multissol cultivar of sunflowers ( Helianthus annuus ) were cultivated in the field in an area of 3,000 m², with a spacing of 0.45 m between rows and 0.40 m between plants. Planting and topdressing fertilizations followed current recommendations for Brazil (Cantarella et al. 2022 ). No pesticides were applied to the crop. To obtain pollen from the sunflower plants, approximately 500 inflorescences were covered with non-woven fabric bags before anthesis. Once the majority of the capitula were open, the sunflower stems were cut, and the inflorescences were taken to the laboratory. The inflorescences were removed from the bags and laid out on the floor of a spray test facility with the same spacing used in the field. The area occupied by the inflorescences was calculated to determine the amount of fungicide to be applied. Fungicide application followed the instructions provided in the commercial product label of Fox Xpro fungicide (Bayer, 2019 ) for the control of Alternaria helianthi (Pleosporaceae), a major fungal pathogen of sunflowers, at a rate of 0.5L ha⁻¹ in 144 liters of spray volume per hectare, with spraying equipment set at a pressure of 200 kPa, 0.5 m above the flowers, under windless conditions. After 15 minutes, the time needed for the spray to dry, the inflorescences were collected. The pollen was collected in a plastic tray, upon which the inverted inflorescences were manually shaken. For the control group pollen, no fungicide spray was applied, and the pollen was collected immediately after inflorescence harvesting. The pollen was stored in 50 mL plastic tubes, which were stored in an ultrafreezer (-80ºC), until it was used in the preparation of the protein pastes for the bees. Dietary Management of Honey Bee Colonies Eight Africanized honey bee ( Apis mellifera ) colonies maintained in standard Langstroth hives were subjected to one of two dietary management systems for 24 weeks. In addition to the food freely collected in the field, four colonies had their diet supplemented (S) with 100g of protein paste, prepared with three parts of multifloral bee pollen and one part of wildflower honey, provided once a week, along with 500 mL of sucrose syrup made from water and crystallized cane sugar in equal proportions (w/w), offered twice a week. The dietary management for the second group involved restricted food availability (R) of the colonies by installing a pollen collector at the entrance of each hive. Colonies in this group did not receive any dietary supplementation. The colonies had naturally mated queens and at the beginning of the experiment were standardized with six frames of brood and four frames of food. The 24-week period was set to ensure that the bees used in the experiments experienced the nutritional management of the colonies during the brood stage, so that the data collected from the bees would not be influenced by the food stocks accumulated before the beggining of the colony treatments. Pollen collection and efficiency of pollen collectors in colonies with restricted feeding Bee pollen obtained from the pollen collectors installed in the hives of group R was collected daily during the 24 weeks of dietary management. After each collection, the pollen obtained from each hive was weighed on a semi-analytical balance. The weekly amount of pollen obtained from each hive was recorded. To estimate the quantity of protein food available to the R colonies, the efficiency of the pollen collectors was determined. An observer stood near each pollen collector for 30 minutes, between 8 and 10 AM during three days, recording the number of bees returning from the field with pollen in their corbiculae. After this 30 minute period, the pollen pellets inside the pollen collector drawer were counted. Observations were conducted in triplicate for each hive. These data were used to determine the efficiency of the pollen collectors as described by Kato et al ( 2024 ). Evaluation of the weight of newly emerged bees After the dietary management period of the colonies, frames with bees about to emerge were obtained from all colonies to create a pool of bees originating from each dietary management (S and R). We used 100 individuals from each nutritional management group. The bees were placed in a freezer for one hour. Subsequently, samples of 10 bees each were placed in crucibles, with five replications, and dryed in an oven with air circulation at 105ºC for 16 hours (AOAC, 1990). Each group of 10 bees was weighed before and after the drying process. Obtaining newly emerged bees, preparation of experimental diets and protein consumption The brood combs from which bees were obtained for weight evaluation of newly emerged bees. Combs with bees about to emerge were obtained from all colonies to create a pool of bees originating from each dietary management (S and R). These frames were placed in an incubator for 24 hours at 33ºC and 70% relative humidity. Subsequently, 0.25L round clear plastic countainers were used as cages to house 20 bees from the same dietary management group; container lids were perforated to allow gas exchange. An Eppendorf tube used as a syrup feeder was installed in the lid with access to food through an opening made with a needle, and another tube partially cut open with a knife was installed through the side of the cage for providing protein food. The protein foods were formulated from a mixture containing three parts of freshly harvested sunflower pollen from flowers treated (F+) or untreated (F-) with the fungicide under study and one part wildflower honey. Sugar syrup was prepared containing two parts cane sugar and one part water. Daily replenishment of the food in the cages was provided, and the amount consumed of the protein food measured with an analytical balance in order to determine protein consumption. Analysis of oxidative stress in nurse honey bees For the evaluation of oxidative metabolism, 320 bees were maintained in 16 cages for five days (2 dietary managements of colonies, 2 diets for the newly emerged bees, 4 repetitions, 20 bees per cage). The bees were kept in an incubator with controlled temperature (33°C) and humidity (70%). An extra cage with 20 bees for each treatment was used to replace any dead bees. Obtaining and quantifying protein in the thorax homogenate After the period in which the bees received the experimental diets, the cages were placed in a freezer at -20 o C for a few minutes to anesthetize the bees. Subsequently, the thorax of the bee was separated from other body parts, including legs and wings, with the aid of fine tipped scissors (Hoskins et al. 1956 ). The thoraxes of bees from the same cage were placed in a mortar containing the isolation medium (250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.2), kept at 4ºC, and macerated with a porcelain pestle. The resulting homogenate pool was filtered through gauze folded eight times. Total protein concentration was determined using the biuret reaction, according to Cain and Skilleter ( 1987 ), with bovine serum albumin (BSA) used as a standard. Evaluation of antioxidant enzyme activity in the thorax homogenate Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) enzyme activity GPx enzyme activity was determined by an indirect method based on oxidation of reduced glutathione (GSH) to oxidized glutathione (GSSG), catalyzed by GPx, and the subsequent oxidation of NADPH by GSSG (FLOHÉ and GÜNZLER, 1984 ). The reaction volume was 1.5 mL containing: GSH 1.0 mM, NADPH 0.2 mM, H 2 O 2 0.25 mM, EDTA 0.5 mM, and sodium phosphate buffer 0.10 M (pH 7.6), along with the bee thorax homogenate (1 mg protein/mL). Enzymatic activity was evaluated at 30ºC in a Beckman-Coulter DU-800 spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 340 nm, and the oxidation of 1 µmol of NADPH/minute was considered one unit of glutathione peroxidase. Specific activity was expressed as units per mg of protein/minute. Catalase enzyme (CAT) activity Evaluation of catalase enzyme activity was measured in thorax homogenate (1 mg of protein) in 1.75 mL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7). The reaction was initiated by adding 200 µL of 10 mM H 2 O 2 . Catalase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to decompose 1 µmol of H 2 O 2 per minute at 25°C and pH 7. Absorbance was read on a Beckman-Coulter model DU-800 spectrophotometer at 230 nm. Specific activity was expressed as units per mg of protein/minute (AEBI, 1974 ). Determination of non-enzymatic antioxidants Reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration GSH concentration in the thorax homogenate was measured according to Hissin and Hilf ( 1976 ), using 2 mL microtubes. The homogenate (1 mg of protein) was added to medium containing 125 mM sucrose, 65 mM KCl, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, to complete 1 mL. After gentle homogenization, 500 µL of 13% trichloroacetic acid was added. The mixture was shaken and then centrifuged at 9000 g for 3 minutes. In 5 mL test tubes, 1800 µL of buffer containing 0.1 M NaH 2 PO 4 , pH 8.0, with 5 mM EDTA, 100 µL of the supernatant obtained from centrifugation, and 100 µL of OPT (o-phthalaldehyde) 1 mg/mL were added. The tubes were then shaken and kept in the dark at room temperature for 15 minutes. Reads were made in a Shimadzu RFPC 5301 spectrofluorometer, with a wavelength of 350 nm for emission and 420 nm for excitation, with a slit width of 3 mm in both cases. Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) concentration For the GSSG assay, 250 µL of the initial supernatant was treated with 250 µL of 0.04 M N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and subjected to the same mixing procedure with OPT. The concentrations of GSH and GSSG were estimated using a standard curve. Oxidative state of pyridine nucleotides (NAD(P)H) Homogenate samples (1 mg of protein/mL) were added to a reaction medium containing 125 mM sucrose, 65 mM KCl, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, with a final volume of 2 mL. Reads were made on a Shimadzu RFPC 5301 spectrofluorometer, using 366 nm for excitation and 450 nm for emission. The results were expressed as Relative Fluorescence Units (RFU). Lipoperoxidation assessment Lipid peroxidation was determined using the TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) method (Buege and Aust, 1978 ). The homogenate (5 mg of protein) was placed in test tubes, and 0.2 mL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (8.1%), 1.5 mL of acetic acid (20%), and 1.5 mL of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) (0.67% aqueous solution) were added. The volume was completed to 4 mL with deionized water (milli-Q), and the mixture was placed in a water bath at 95°C for 60 minutes. After the incubation period, the tubes were removed and cooled in an ice bath. Then, 1 mL of milli-Q water was added, and the MDA-TBA complex was extracted with 5 mL of n-butanol. The tubes were centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 minutes, the organic phase was collected, and the absorbance was measured at 535 nm. The amount of lipid peroxidation was determined using the molar extinction coefficient of 1.56 x 10 5 M -1 . Longevity test For the longevity test, 480 bees were used, with half from each nutritional management (S or R). Groups of 20 newly emerged individuals were placed in plastic cages and fed the same experimental diets used for evaluation of oxidative metabolism (2 colony nutritional managements, fed with pollen contaminated with fungicide (F+) or not (F-), with 6 replications). The number of dead bees was recorded daily until the death of the last bee. The cages were maintained in an incubator at 33ºC and 70% relative humidity. Statistical Analysis The weekly amount of honey bee pollen collected from the colonies of group R was recorded. The efficiency of the pollen collectors was determined based on three observations for each colony, and data dispersion was assessed through the standard error of the mean. The data collected for the evaluation of bee weight, not considering the factor related to fungicide contamination, as bees were weighed immediately after emergence, was analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), and in cases where a significant effect was observed (P < 0.05), pairwise mean comparisons were made using the Tukey test. For the analysis of each variable related to oxidative metabolism and protein consumption, a completely randomized design in a split-plot scheme with two factors was used: nutritional management of the colonies (supplemented – S or restricted – R) and adult bee protein diet (with fungicide – F + or without fungicide – F-), which were used to establish four treatments (SF+, SF-, RF+, RF-). The main factor, nutritional management, was applied first, followed by feeding the bees from the S or R colonies with protein (F + or F-). A mixed linear model was fitted considering the two factors as well as their interaction. The adjusted means for each treatment combination were compared using Tukey's test (5%). For the assessment of bee longevity, we analyzed the results of the four treatments using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. Next, we used the hazard ratios for each factor to compare bee longevity across different treatments by fitting a Cox proportional hazards model. All analyses were conducted using SAS software (SAS Institute, 2024). Results Dietary Management and Pollen Collection During the 24 weeks of dietary management of the colonies, honey bee pollen was collected daily from the colonies in the restricted diet group R). On average, 65.23 ± 12.35g of bee pollen was obtained weekly per colony. Throughout the experimental period, 1,171.27 to 1,828.42g of pollen was collected per colony. In the group of colonies supplemented weekly (S), 2,400g of protein paste containing 1,800g of bee pollen was provided to each colony during the same period. The mean efficiency of the pollen collectors was 61.2 ± 4.8%. Thus, considering the amount of pollen collected with the pollen traps, the estimated quantity of this proteinaceous food that was brought into the colonies over the 24 weeks ranged from 454.80 to 709.98g. Weekly, the available amount of pollen for each colony in the restricted diet group (R) was estimated to be 18.95 to 29.58g. Weight of newly emerged bees The live weight of bees from colonies with dietary supplementation did not differ significantly from that of bees from colonies with restricted feeding (Table 1 ). After sample drying, it was observed that the dry matter content and the dry matter: original matter ratio were higher in bees from well-fed colonies (S) compared to bees from nutritionally restricted colonies (R). Table 1 Mean live weight, dry weight in mg, and dry weight/live weight ratio of newly emerged bees obtained from colonies with supplemented or restricted food availability. Effects Live weight (LW) Dry weight (DW) DW:LW Feeding Supplemented 82.72 18.06 a 21.83 a Restricted 79.37 15.53 b 19.57 b SE 1.21 0.54 0.46 P value 0.178 0.007 0.004 Means followed by different letters in the same column differ significantly from each other (P < 0.05), according to the Tukey test. Means for 10 individuals from each colony. Protein food consumption during five days and oxidative metabolism The consumption of protein paste by the bees in the cages was influenced by the interaction between the nutritional management of the colonies from which the bees were obtained and the applicationi of fungicide to the sunflowers from which the pollen was obtained (Table 2 ). Bees from supplemented colonies that received protein paste containing sunflower pollen from inflorescences untreated with fungicide (SF-) consumed a significantly more protein diet compared to bees from restricted diet colonies that received the same food. These bees (RF) consumed more protein paste than the others (SF + and RF+), which did not differ from each other. Fungicide contamination of the food led to a reduction in food consumption, both in bees from colonies with nutritional supplementation and in those with less available protein food during the brood phase. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity: The activity of the GPx enzyme was influenced by nutritional management and pollen treatment with fungicide (Table 2 ), being higher in bees that had more food available for their development during the brood phase (S) in comparison with R, and that ingested protein food without fungicide (F-), compared to bees that ingested the contaminated diet F+. Catalase (CAT) enzyme activity: The activity of the catalase enzyme was influenced by the interaction of nutritional condition of the colony of origen with fungicide contamination of the pollen that they consumed, with a reduction in its activity in bees from group SF + compared to bees from other treatments, which did not differ from each other (Table 2 ). Reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) concentrations The concentration of reduced glutathione and oxidized glutathione was higher in bees obtained from S compaed to those from R colonies. No effect of the fungicide was observed for the concentration of non-enzymatic antioxidants. No difference in the ratio between GSH and GSSG concentrations was observed for bees from the four treatments, indicating that there was no alteration in the oxidative state of glutathione, when considering the factors nutritional management of the colonies and ingestion of food contaminated with fungicide. Oxidative State in Pyridine Nucleotides (NAD(P)H) The concentration of NAD(P)H in the thorax homogenate was higher in bees from colonies that had their diet supplemented (S) (Table 2 ). No effect of the fungicide in pollen fed to the caged bees was observed. Evaluation of Lipoperoxidation In the analysis of lipid peroxidation through the quantification of malondialdehyde (MDA), it was observed that pollen contaminated with fungicide led to an increase in lipoperoxidation levels (Table 2 ). This oxidation was not influenced by the dietary management in the colonies from which the newly emerged bees were obtained. Table 2 Individual consumption of protein paste over five days, activity of antioxidant enzymes, and parameters related to oxidative stress in the thorax homogenate of bees after the feeding period. Effects Consumption (mg/bee) GPx (mU/mg of protein) CAT (µmol/mg of protein/min) GSH (nmol/mg of protein) GSSG (nmol/mg of protein) GSH/ GSSG NAD(P)H (Relative Fluorescence Units) MDA (nmol/mg of protein) Feeding Supplemented (S) 10.973 127.570 a 24.065 1.453 b 0.067 b 22.144 23.873 a 0.197 Restricted (R) 7.968 92.725 b 30.785 2.477 a 0.098 a 26.471 7.630 b 0.188 Fungicide With fungicide (F+) 6.716 104.400 b 23.705 1.928 0.077 25.289 15.750 0.200 a Without fungicide (F-) 12.223 115.890 a 31.145 2.002 0.088 23.325 15.758 0.185 b SF+ 6.823 c 126.800 18.523 b 1.423 0.070 b 20.973 23.870 0.210 Interaction SF- 15.122 a 128.330 29.607 a 1.483 0.063 b 23.317 23.877 0.183 RF+ 6.608 c 82.009 28.887 a 2.433 0.083 b 29.608 7.630 0.190 RF- 9.325 b 103.440 32.683 a 2.520 0.114 a 23.333 7.640 0.187 Standard error of the mean 0.533 3.089 1.064 0.187 0.010 2.470 0.047 0.006 Source of variation Probability Feeding (a) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.200 0.200 Fungicide (b) 0.001 0.030 0.200 > 0.200 > 0.200 > 0.200 0.043 Interaction (a x b) 0.001 0.052 0.009 > 0.200 0.140 0.095 > 0.200 0.098 Means followed by the same letter for the same effect (bee feeding or use of fungicide on sunflower plants or interaction between these factors) for each variable do not differ significantly from each other (P > 0.05), according to the Tukey test. Food consisting of three parts of sunflower pollen treated or not with the fungicide Fox Xpro and one part honey. Longevity of workers Bee survival was affected by the feeding management to which the colonies of origin were subjected and contamination of the diet fed to the caged bees with fungicide (𝑋 2 = 40.167, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1 ). The longevity of bees that developed during the larval stage in supplemented colonies and received uncontaminated food with fungicide in the adult stage (15.20 ± 0.34 days) was greater than that of bees from the same colonies that were fed fungicide-contaminated food in the adult stage (12.88 ± 0.33 days). Bees that developed in colonies with restricted feeding and received uncontaminated food in the adult stage had a mean survival of 13.04 ± 0.36 days. Longevity was lowest for bees from colonies with restricted feeding that received fungicide-contaminated food in the adult stage (12.08 ± 0.27 days). When considering the hazard ratios for each factor evaluated, we observed that fungicide (F+) in the bees diet results in lower survival of bees from R colonies compared to bees from S colonies (Table 3 ). Even when bees were treated with pollen without fungicide (F-), the survival of bees from S colonies was significantly higher than bees from R colonies. Regarding the effect of fungicide within each nutritional management group, we observed that for both S and R bee groups, survival was lower due to exposure to food containing pollen from inflorescences treated with fungicide. Table 3 Chi-square, P values and hazard ratios for dietary management of honey bee colonies (S for supplemented and R for restricted feeding) and presence of fungicide in protein paste provided to the bees (F + means with fungicide and F- without fungicide). Effect Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq SE Feeding 4.0595 0.0439 0.1367 Fungicide 12.8742 0.0003 0.1361 Feeding x Fungicide 0.3744 0.5406 0.1928 Hazard Ratios Point estimate Confidence Limits S x R at F+ 0.759 0.581 0.993 S x R at F- 0.675 0.517 0.881 F + x F- at S 1.630 1.248 2.128 F + x F- at R 1.448 1.105 1.900 Discussion According to Corona et al. ( 2023 ), nutritional stress significantly contributes to weakening and loss of colonies; it is intrinsically linked to colony health and vigor, habitat degradation, pollen diversity, and innate foraging differences among bees from different colonies. Pollen deprivation induces bees to forage early, which is associated with accelerated aging and reduced longevity of these insects (Perry et al. 2015 ; Corona et al. 2023 ). With food restriction, colonies undergo a population adjustment to balance pollen demand and supply. In our experiment, the estimated amount of food that bees were able to bring into the hives is compatible with the minimum amount needed to maintain about 4,000 individuals, considered a small colony of honey bees (Danner et al. 2017 ). The weight of bees can be influenced by increased food availability, resulting in positive effects on the health and longevity of adult bees, provided that the diet is nutritionally balanced (Ihle et al. 2014 ). In our study, the weight of bees upon emerging from the combs was favored by the more suitable nutritional conditions of colonies with food supplementation (Table 1 ). During the brood phase, honey bees require 125 to 187 mg of pollen. As adults, about 3.9 mg of pollen is needed daily, with peaks during the nurse bee phase (Brodschneider and Crailsheim, 2010 ). In this phase, consumption is higher to ensure the proper development of the hypopharyngeal glands. In our study, newly emerged bees from the SF- treatment consumed about 2.27 mg of sunflower pollen per day during the first five days of life (Table 2 ). Bees from colonies subjected to food restriction consumed less food than those that developed in an environment with greater food availability during the brood phase, considering sunflower pollen untreated with fungicide (Table 2 ). Thus, it is considered that food restriction during the brood phase hinders the development of the bee in the adult phase, with no compensatory gain in food consumption during adulthood. Larvae reared during deficiency of an essential nutrient may become adults with lower survival or impaired brood care and foraging skills (Brodschneider and Crailsheim, 2010 ). Bee bread is useful as a source of antioxidants that protect cells against oxidative damage to the cytoplasmic structure within cellular organelles and in the extracellular fluid (Martinello and Mutinelli, 2021 ). Bee bread from different botanical sources has different antioxidant capacities, more related to specific profiles of flavones and phenolic acids (Borycka et al. 2015 ), highlighting the importance of protein nutrition for the physiological well-being of bees (Wright et al. 2018 ). Food contamination with fungicide caused reduced food consumption, independent of their being from well fed or nutritionally deprived colonies. The sensitivity of bees to pesticides may be linked to the life stage of the bee (Zhu et al. 2020 ), as changes occur in endocrine and metabolic activity during behavioral maturation related to age, inherent to the transition from nursing tasks to foraging (Robinson, 2002 ). Forager bees show higher detoxifying enzymatic activity than bees working solely within the colony (Smirle and Robinson, 1989 ; Berenbaum and Johnson, 2015 ). However, it seems that susceptibility among castes depends on the type of pesticide being evaluated, as some active ingredients are more toxic to foragers in comparison with nurse bees (Barascou et al., 2022 ). Sunflower pollen has been indicated in some studies as having lower nutritional quality compared to various other types of pollen (Schmidt et al. 1987 ), with low protein content (Radev, 2019 ), and low levels of two essential amino acids for honey bees, methionine and tryptophan, below the minimum required by bees (Nicolson and Human, 2013 ). Pollen has a complex chemical composition, including amino acids, lipids, sugars, secondary metabolites, and other elements (Palmer-Young et al. 2019 ). Indeed, plant secondary compounds have stood out for their potential positive impacts on pollinators, including protective action against pesticide exposure (Ardalani et al. 2021 ). Bee foraging on various plant species favors obtaining a more balanced and nutrient-rich diet (Vaudo et al. 2015 ). The hypothesis that adequate nutrition can protect animals against the adverse effects of stressors, such as pesticides, is a well-established perspective in biology (Wahl and Ulm, 1983 ). Antioxidant defense systems in honey bees encompass both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms, both crucial for mitigating damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Corona et al. 2023 ). Among the antioxidant enzymes, glutathione S-transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) are noteworthy. Simultaneously, non-enzymatic components such as glutathione, NAD(P)H, and vitamins C and E, actively participate in neutralizing ROS (Badiou-Bénéteau et al. 2012 ; Tawfik et al. 2020 ). GPx activity was higher in the thoracic homogenate of bees that consumed more food. According to Wahl and Ulm ( 1983 ), sensitivity to oxidative stress in bees is reduced with improved pollen quality. Therefore, considering the low quality of sunflower pollen (Radev, 2019 ), we presumed that lower food consumption implies lower activity of this enzyme. A reduction in GPx enzyme activity observed in bees exposed to food contaminated with fungicide may be due to a reduction in energy availability in cells, given the inhibition of the respiratory chain inherent to the action of the active principles bixafen and trifloxystrobin (Bartlett et al. 2002 ; Oliver and Hewitt, 2014 ; Nicodemo et al. 2020 ). CAT enzyme activity was only altered in the SF + group, which was lower than in the other groups. Even though there was no significant difference in food consumption between SF + and RF+, it is suggested that the slightly higher consumption in the former group may have resulted in a more effective action of the active principles bixafen and trifloxystrobin in reducing cellular work capacity. In this sense, the antioxidant defense would not neutralize the levels of ROS generated by exposure to the fungicide. The GSH:GSSG ratio is recognized as a fundamental indicator of intracellular redox balance and antioxidant capacity. In our study, this ratio was not affected by the nutritional management of the colonies of origin of the bees or by feeding on food contaminated with fungicide. The concentration of NAD(P)H was higher in bees that consumed more food, with no effect detected of the pesticide, considering the exposure level, which was according to the fungicide application protocol. These results may differ from those obtained in other investigations (Kapoor et al. 2011 ; Bal et al. 2012 ; Chakrabarti et al. 2015 ) regarding the impact of pesticides on the concentration of these non-enzymatic oxidants. However, the differences between populations, doses, and exposure modes used in each of the works should be considered. A significant increase in lipid peroxidation levels, evidenced by the marker MDA, was observed in samples of bees fed pollen from inflorescences exposed to the triple-action fungicide, regardless of the dietary management of the colony of origin of the bees. The active principle protioconazole blocks the sterol biosynthesis pathway, which is fundamental for the organization and structuring of cell membranes (Schuhmann et al. 2022 ). Lipoperoxidation is recognized as a sign of cellular damage and oxidative stress, which can affect bee cells exposed to xenobiotics (Balieira et al. 2018 ). Regarding longevity, we observed that the fungicide affected bee longevity. Bees that developed in supplemented colonies during the brood phase and did not receive contaminated food during adulthood lived 16.6% longer than bees that had restricted feeding during the brood phase and received uncontaminated food. The greatest impacts on bee survival were observed when bees developed during the brood phase in colonies with food restriction and, during adulthood, received food contaminated with fungicide, with a 20.5% reduction in the average survival of workers compared to the longer-lived bees (SF-), highlighting the synergistic effect between food restriction and exposure to fungicide. The longevity of honey bees is reduced when exposed to pesticides; however, the presence of some phytochemicals in food, even those without nutritional value, can mitigate the effects on bee survival (Liao et al. 2020 ). The availability of food in greater quantity (Mattos et al. 2017 ; Hýbl et al. 2021 ) and of higher quality (Castle et al. 2022 ; Costa et al. 2022 ) can favor the health and survival of bees exposed to pesticides. Despite the use of the pesticide according to application protocols, there was damage to the health of these insects. Therefore, it is suggested that the recommendation for the use of this fungicide during the flowering period of target crops be reconsidered. Conclusion Feeding pollen from sunflowers sparyed with a commercial fungicide containing bixafen, prothioconazole and trifloxystrobin caused oxidative stress in honey bees, even though the application was made in accordance with agronomic recommendations. Bee survival was adversely affected by exposure to fungicide, with a synergistic effect on bees from colonies subjected to food restriction. Declarations Funding This research was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP (process n o 2021/00702-1) to Daniel Nicodemo and by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES)-Finance Code 001 to Thais Regina Ramos Alves. Competing interests Daniel Nicodemo reports financial support was provided by FAPESP. All the authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Data availability The datasets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Author Statement TRRA, MFT, TALF, AYK, CRAG, YMMF, JAS and CAM: data collection. DN, DDJ, FEM, EPP and EFV: research design. DN and TGP: data analysis. DN, ROO, FEM and DDJ: manuscript writing. References Aebi H (1974) Catalase In: Bergmeyer HU (ed.) Methods of enzymatic analysis. Academic Press, New York, pp. 673-684 Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC] (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Washington, DC: Author Ardalani H, Vidkjær NH, Kryger P, Fiehn O, Fomsgaard IS (2021) Metabolomics unveils the influence of dietary phytochemicals on residual pesticide concentrations in honey bees. Environ Int, 152, 106503 Aylanc V, Falcão SI, Ertosun S, Vilas-Boas M (2021) From the hive to the table: Nutrition value, digestibility and bioavailability of the dietary phytochemicals present in bee pollen and bee bread. Trends Food Sci, 109:464-481 Badiou-Bénéteau A, Carvalho SM, Brunet JL, Carvalho, GA, Buleté A, Giroud B, Belzunces LP (2012) Development of biomarkers of exposure to xenobiotics in the honeybee Apis mellifera : Application to the systemic insecticide thiamethoxam. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 82:22-31 Bal R, Türk G, Tuzcu M et al (2012) Assessment of imidacloprid toxicity on reproductive organ system of adult male rats. J Environ Sci Health B 47(5):434-444 Balieira KVB, Mazzo M, Bizzerra PFV, Guimarães ARJS, Nicodemo D, Mingatto FE (2018) Imidacloprid-induced oxidative stress in honey bees and the antioxidant action of caffeine. Apidol, 49:562–572 Barascou, L; Sene, D; Le Conte, Y; Alaux, C (2022) Pesticide risk assessment: honeybee workers are not all equal regarding the risk posed by exposure to pesticides. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 29: 90328–90337 Bartlett DW, Clough JM, Godwin JR, Hall AA, Hamer M, Parr-Dobrzanski B (2002) The strobilurin fungicides. Pest Manag Sci, 58:649–662 Batista AC, Domingues CEC, Costa MJ, Silva-Zacarin ECM (2020) Is a strobilurin fungicide capable of inducing histopathological effects on the midgut and Malpighian tubules of honey bees? J Apic Res, 59(5):834-843 Bayer. (2019). Fox® Xpro: Fungicida. São Paulo: Bayer S. A. Retrieved from https://www.agro.bayer.com.br/d/fungicida-bcs-fox-xpro-br Berenbaum MR, Johnson RM (2015) Xenobiotic detoxification pathways in honey bees. Curr Opin Insect Sci, 10:51-58 Böhme F, Bischoff G, Zebitz CPW, Rosenkranz P, Wallner K (2017) Chronic exposure of honeybees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), to a pesticide mixture in realistic field exposure rates. Apidol, 48:353-363 Borycka K, Grabek-Lejko D, Kasprzyk I (2015) Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of commercial bee pollen products. J Apic Res, 54(5): 491-502 Brodschneider R, Crailsheim K (2010) Nutrition and health in honey bees. Apidol, 41(3):278-294 Buege JA, Aust SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol, 52:302-310 Cain K, Skilleter DN (1987) Preparation and use of mitochondria in toxicological research. In Snell K, Mullock B (Eds.), Biochemical Toxicology, : IRL Press, Oxford pp. 217–254 Cantarella H, Mattos Jr D, Boaretto RM, Quaggio JA, Raij BV (2022) Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo (2ª ed.). Instituto Agronômico, Campinas. Carneiro LS, Martínez LC, Gonçalves WG, Santana LM, Serrão JE (2020) The fungicide iprodione affects midgut cells of non-target worker honey bees Apis mellifera . Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 189: 109991. Castle D, Alkassab AT, Bischoff G, Steffan-Dewenter I, Pistorius J (2022) High nutritional status promotes vitality of honey bees and mitigates negative effects of pesticides. Sci Total Environ, 806:151280 Chakrabarti P, Rana S, Sarkar S, Smith B, Basu P (2015) Pesticide-induced oxidative stress in laboratory and field populations of native honey bees along intensive agricultural landscapes in two Eastern Indian states. Apidol, 46(1):107-129 Cizelj I, Glavan G, Božič J, Oven I, Mrak V, Narat M (2016) Prochloraz and coumaphos induce different gene expression patterns in three developmental stages of the Carniolan honey bee ( Apis mellifera carnica Pollmann). Pestic Biochem Physiol, 128:68-75 Corona M, Branchiccela B, Alburaki M, Palmer-Young EC, Madella S, Chen Y, Evans JD (2023) Decoupling the effects of nutrition, age, and behavioral caste on honey bee physiology, immunity, and colony health. Front Physiol, 14:1149840 Costa CP, Leza M, Duennes MA, Fisher K, Vollaro A, Hur M, Kirkwood JS, Woodard SH (2022) Pollen diet mediates how pesticide exposure impacts brain gene expression in nest-founding bumble bee queens. Sci Total Environ, 833, 155216. Danner N, Keller A, Härtel S, Steffan-Dewenter I (2017) Honey bee foraging ecology: Season but not landscape diversity shapes the amount and diversity of collected pollen. PLoS One, 12(8):e0183716 Fisher A, Carvalho CU, Coleman C, Hoffmann C et al (2017) Synergistic effects of almond protective fungicides on the survival of bee foragers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Econ Entomol, 110:802-808 Fisher A, Degrandi-Hoffman G, Liao LH et al (2023) The challenge of balancing fungicide use and pollinator health. In: Harrison JF (Ed.), Adv Insect Physiol, 64:117-190 Flohé L, Günzler WA (1984) Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol, 105:114-121 Hernández J, Riveros AJ, Amaya-Márquez M (2021) Sublethal doses of glyphosate impair olfactory memory retention, but not learning in the honey bee ( Apis mellifera scutellata ). J Insect Conser, 25:683–694 Hýbl M, Mráz P, Šipoš J, Hoštičková I, Bohatá A, Čurn V, Kopec T (2021) Polyphenols as food supplement improved food consumption and longevity of honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) intoxicated by pesticide thiacloprid. Insects, 12(7):572 Hissin PJ, Hilf R (1976) A fluorometric method for determination of oxidized and reduced glutathione in tissues. Anal Biochem, 74(1):214-226 Hoskins DD, Cheldelin VH, Newburgh RW (1956) Oxidation enzyme systems of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. J Gen Physiol, 39(5):705–713 Ihle KE, Baker NA, Amdam GV (2014) Insulin-like peptide response to nutritional input in honey bee workers. J Insect Physiol, 69:49-55 Kato AY, Freitas TAL, Gomes, CRA, Alves TRR, Ferraz YMM, Trivellato MF, De Jong D, Biller JD, Nicodemo D (2024) Bixafen, prothioconazole, and trifloxystrobin alone or in combination have a greater effect on health related gene expression in honey bees from nutritionally deprived than from protein supplemented colonies. Insects, 15:523. Kapoor U, Srivastava MK, Srivastava LP (2011) Toxicological impact of technical imidacloprid on ovarian morphology, hormones and antioxidant enzymes in female rats. Food Cheml Toxicol, 49:3086–3089 Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 274:303– 313 Liao LH, Wu WY, Berenbaum MR (2017) Behavioral responses of honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) to natural and synthetic xenobiotics in food. Sci Rep, 7:15924 Liao LH, Pearlstein DJ, Wu WY, Kelley AG, Montag WM, Hsieh EM, Berenbaum MR (2020) Increase in longevity and amelioration of pesticide toxicity by natural levels of dietary phytochemicals in the honey bee, Apis mellifera . PLoS ONE, 15(12):e0243364 Mao W, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR (2017) Disruption of quercetin metabolism by fungicide affects energy production in honey bees ( Apis mellifera ). Proc Natl Acad Sci, 114(10):2538-2543 Martinello M, Mutinelli F (2021) Antioxidant activity in bee products: A review. Antioxidants, 10(1):71 Mattos IM, Soares AEE, Tarpy DR (2017) Mitigating effects of pollen during paraquat exposure on gene expression and pathogen prevalence in Apis mellifera L. Ecotoxicol, 27(1):32-44 Mucci CA, Ramirez L, Giffoni RS, Lammattina L (2021) Cold stress induces specific antioxidant responses in honey bee brood. Apidol, 52: 596–607 Nicodemo D, Mingatto FE, De Jong D et al (2020) Mitochondrial respiratory inhibition promoted by pyraclostrobin in fungi is also observed in honey bees. Environ Toxicol Chem, 39(6):1267-1272 Nicolson, SW, Human H (2013) Chemical composition of the ‘low quality’ pollen of sunflower ( Helianthus annuus , Asteraceae). Apidol, 44:144–152 Oliver R, Hewitt HG (2014) Fungicides in crop protection (2 nd ed.). CABI, Boston Palmer-Young EC, Farrell IW, Adler LS, Milano NJ, Egan PA, Irwin RE, Stevenson PC (2019) Secondary metabolites from nectar and pollen: a resource for ecological and evolutionary studies. Ecol, 100(4):e02621 Perry C, Søvik E, Myerscough MR, Barron AB (2015) Rapid behavioral maturation accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 112:3427–3432 Poquet Y, Vidau C, Alaux C (2016) Modulation of pesticide response in honeybees. Apidol, 47:412–426 Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Ngo HT et al (2016) Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nat, 540:220–229 Prado A, Pioz M, Vidau C, Requier F, Jury M, Crauser D, Alaux C (2019) Exposure to pollen-bound pesticide mixtures induces longer-lived but less efficient honey bees. Sci Total Environ, 650:1250–1260 Quinlan GM, Grozinger CM (2023) Honey bee nutritional ecology: From physiology to landscapes. Adv Insect Physiol, 64:289-345 Radev Z (2019) Pollen protein content from different regions in Bulgaria suggests low variability. Bee World, 96(4):108–110 Robinson GE (2002) Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. Am Nat, 160(Supp. 6):160–S172 Rondeau S, Raine NE (2022) Fungicides and bees: a review of exposure and risk. Environ Int, 165:107311 SAS Institute Inc. (2024). SAS OnDemand for Academics (Versão 9.4) [Software]. Disponível em https://www.sas.com/pt_br/software/on-demand-for-academics.html Schmidt JO, Thoenes SC, Levin MD (1987) Survival of honey bees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), fed various pollen sources. J Econ Entomol, 80:176–183 Schuhmann A, Schmid AP, Manzer S, Schulte J, Scheiner R (2022) Interaction of insecticides and fungicides in bees. Front Insect Sci, 1:808335 Sies H, Berndt C, Jones DP (2017) Oxidative Stress. Annu Rev Biochem, 86:715-748 Smirle MJ, Robinson GE (1989) Behavioral status and detoxifying enzyme activity are related in worker honey bees. J Insect Behav, 2:285-289 Tadei R, Domingues CEC, Malaquias JB, Camilo EV, Malaspina O Silva-Zacarin ECM (2019) Late effect of larval co-exposure to the insecticide clothianidin and fungicide pyraclostrobin in Africanized Apis mellifera . Sci Rep, 9(1): 3277 Tawfik AI, Ahmed ZH, Abdel-Rahman MF, Moustafa AM (2020) Influence of winter feeding on colony development and the antioxidant system of the honey bee, Apis mellifera . J Apic Res, 59:752-763 Tong L, Nieh JC, Tosi S (2019) Combined nutritional stress and a new systemic pesticide (flupyradifurone, Sivanto®) reduce bee survival, food consumption, flight success, and thermoregulation. Chemosphere, 237:124408 Vaudo AD, Tooker JF, Grozinger CM, Patch HM (2015) Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration. Curr Opin Insect Sci, 10:133-141 Wahl O, Ulm K (1983) Influence pollen feeding and physiological condition on pesticide sensitivity of the honey bee Apis mellifera carnica . Oecologia, 59:106–128 Wickramasinghe K, Mathers JC, Wopereis S, Marsman DS, Griffiths JC (2020) From lifespan to healthspan: The role of nutrition in healthy ageing. J Nutri Sci, 9:e33 Wright GA, Nicolson SW, Shafir S (2018) Nutritional physiology and ecology of honey bees. Annu Rev Entomol, 63:327-344 Zhu YC, Caren J, Reddy GVP, Li W, Yao J (2020) Effect of age on insecticide susceptibility and enzymatic activities of three detoxification enzymes and one invertase in honey bee workers ( Apis mellifera ). Comp Biochem Physiol C, 238:108844 Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4836495","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":334562569,"identity":"9c668183-2e15-4ca6-9fba-b0c14d0c1ab5","order_by":0,"name":"Thais Alves","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Thais","middleName":"","lastName":"Alves","suffix":""},{"id":334562570,"identity":"64e6546f-34a5-4e90-aa22-8d775e255cad","order_by":1,"name":"Matheus Trivellato","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Matheus","middleName":"","lastName":"Trivellato","suffix":""},{"id":334562571,"identity":"ab3e444e-4770-4bb3-849f-35afb5a08bce","order_by":2,"name":"Tainá Freitas","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tainá","middleName":"","lastName":"Freitas","suffix":""},{"id":334562572,"identity":"cfebda67-7284-41d4-878d-3160ba153d59","order_by":3,"name":"Aline Kato","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aline","middleName":"","lastName":"Kato","suffix":""},{"id":334562573,"identity":"3b914bf0-1613-447b-9529-a26783198985","order_by":4,"name":"Cássia Gomes","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cássia","middleName":"","lastName":"Gomes","suffix":""},{"id":334562574,"identity":"69f23361-79a0-479f-8213-56ee7be3656d","order_by":5,"name":"Yara Ferraz","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yara","middleName":"","lastName":"Ferraz","suffix":""},{"id":334562575,"identity":"ca2e0e79-1d09-479c-acae-3e9d7ec3c5e4","order_by":6,"name":"Jéssica Serafim","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jéssica","middleName":"","lastName":"Serafim","suffix":""},{"id":334562576,"identity":"0f0735d9-0648-456b-b6e8-5517b069cac7","order_by":7,"name":"David De Jong","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"USP: Universidade de Sao Paulo","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"David","middleName":"","lastName":"De Jong","suffix":""},{"id":334562577,"identity":"93d437b9-b783-4e9f-befc-35edf4a12d78","order_by":8,"name":"Evandro Prado","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Evandro","middleName":"","lastName":"Prado","suffix":""},{"id":334562578,"identity":"35a35331-21ab-485c-a1e3-1d97a996508a","order_by":9,"name":"Eduardo Vicente","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eduardo","middleName":"","lastName":"Vicente","suffix":""},{"id":334562579,"identity":"7fe4f915-ba4d-47df-891a-247739d61866","order_by":10,"name":"Ricardo Orsi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ricardo","middleName":"","lastName":"Orsi","suffix":""},{"id":334562580,"identity":"453e7e1c-ac49-4261-886e-a9acb85261ad","order_by":11,"name":"Gener Pereira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gener","middleName":"","lastName":"Pereira","suffix":""},{"id":334562581,"identity":"f9ffab0d-6be4-40dd-87f0-c8441f28de85","order_by":12,"name":"Camila Miranda","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Camila","middleName":"","lastName":"Miranda","suffix":""},{"id":334562582,"identity":"9cf02135-e7d9-4b92-bc48-250609a26a8b","order_by":13,"name":"Fábio Mingatto","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fábio","middleName":"","lastName":"Mingatto","suffix":""},{"id":334562583,"identity":"4fa3d7a8-1662-4cc8-b327-5699d51df287","order_by":14,"name":"Daniel Nicodemo","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-5791","institution":"UNESP FCAV: Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho Faculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Daniel","middleName":"","lastName":"Nicodemo","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-07-31 14:51:29","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4836495/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4836495/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":63457333,"identity":"58fbde08-4d26-4105-84aa-9993555f9f3b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-28 10:44:11","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":491184,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eKaplan-Meier survival curve of the longevity of bees that developed during the larval stage in colonies with supplemented (S) or restricted (R) feeding and were fed as adults with pollen contaminated (F+) or not with fungicide (F-).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4836495/v1/25127e36526021a04c2df12e.png"},{"id":63817527,"identity":"f701bd9c-cbcb-43cb-b4c7-8d204af9cbfd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-02 15:13:18","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1352045,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4836495/v1/d40f7b18-fb3b-4280-8451-d8cdc40e7b85.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Pollen contaminated with a triple-action fungicide induced oxidative stress and reduced bee longevity though with less impact on lifespan in bees from well fed colonies","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eBees play a vital role in pollination, contributing to agricultural production and maintenance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems (Potts et al. 2018). Concerns about the health and longevity of bees have grown, with various factors being associated with the decline of these natural insect pollinator populations (Hern\u0026aacute;ndez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). The honey bee (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e) is a managed crucial pollinator of crops worldwide, frequently exposed to various pesticides, especially in crop fields (Poquet et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). When visiting sprayed crops or other areas affected by pesticide drift, bees can become contaminated. The damage may increase when two pesticides are applied together or when a product with more than one active ingredient is used, as is the case with some modern fungicides (B\u0026ouml;hme et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Prado et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Rondeau and Raine, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungicides are generally considered to have low toxicity for bees based on acute toxicity tests; however, fungicides provoke behavioral (Tadei et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), cellular (Batista et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), microbial (Carneiro et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), and immunological changes (Cizelj et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e) in bees. Additionally, they can reduce food consumption (Cizelj et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Liao et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Mao et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) and bee longevity (Fisher et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e. Given the stress on bee health resulting from fungicide exposure, it is pertinent to consider the nutritional condition of colonies in agricultural landscapes, especially since a deficient diet negatively affects the ability of bees to deal with pathogens and toxins (Fisher et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). A deficiency in pollen availability can result in a reduced colony population and compromise the health of the bees, decreasing resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses at individual and colony levels (Corona et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Fisher et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a scenario of intensive pesticide use and landscapes with spatial and temporal limitations on food resources for bees, nutritional support for these beneficial insects should be considered with increased attention, as it is crucial for their development and survival and is intrinsically linked to their resilience against numerous stressors, including pesticides (Wickramasinghe et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Quinlan and Grozinger, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Moreover, a better understanding of the interaction between nutrition, pesticide exposure, and the functioning of the antioxidant system in bees is essential, considering impairments to bee health that impact their behavior, productive performance, oxidative metabolism, and longevity (Tong et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Fisher et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA triple-action fungicide, containing the active ingredients bixafen, prothioconazole, and trifloxystrobin, is now commonly used in large-scale agricultural productions, including cotton, sunflower, and soybeans (Bayer, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). These crops are visited by bees for pollen and/or nectar, and crop yields are benefitted by entomophilous pollination (Klein et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). However, little is known about the isolated and combined effects of these active ingredients on bee health, especially the oxidative metabolism of nurse honey bees. Increases in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) or failures in the antioxidant defense system lead to oxidative stress, a state detrimental to cellular homeostasis. Defenses against oxidative stress operate through enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as non-enzymatic components, which can be obtained endogenously or from natural or artificial food sources (Sies et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNutritional stress has been identified as one of the factors that harm bee health and longevity, while non-enzymatic antioxidants present in high-quality diets can assist in the antioxidant defenses of bees (Mucci et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Corona et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). In this study, we evaluated whether nutritional supplementation of colonies can mitigate the harmful effects on the oxidative system and longevity resulting from the exposure of adult bees to protein food contaminated with a modern triple-component fungicide.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Material and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eExperiment location, sunflower cultivation, fungicide application, and pollen collection\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe experiment was conducted in Dracena, state of S\u0026atilde;o Paulo, at 21\u0026deg;27'33\" South Latitude and 51\u0026deg;33'22\" West Longitude, with an altitude of 392 meters. This study involved the use of two nutritional management practices for honey bee colonies to obtain bees that developed under different conditions regarding food availability during their brood stage. Bees were obtained from these colonies and maintained in groups of 20 in small cages in an incubator, where they were fed with protein paste based on sunflower pollen from plants that were treated or not treated with a commercial fungicide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CATI Multissol cultivar of sunflowers (\u003cem\u003eHelianthus annuus\u003c/em\u003e) were cultivated in the field in an area of 3,000 m\u0026sup2;, with a spacing of 0.45 m between rows and 0.40 m between plants. Planting and topdressing fertilizations followed current recommendations for Brazil (Cantarella et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). No pesticides were applied to the crop.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo obtain pollen from the sunflower plants, approximately 500 inflorescences were covered with non-woven fabric bags before anthesis. Once the majority of the capitula were open, the sunflower stems were cut, and the inflorescences were taken to the laboratory.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe inflorescences were removed from the bags and laid out on the floor of a spray test facility with the same spacing used in the field. The area occupied by the inflorescences was calculated to determine the amount of fungicide to be applied. Fungicide application followed the instructions provided in the commercial product label of Fox Xpro fungicide (Bayer, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) for the control of \u003cem\u003eAlternaria helianthi\u003c/em\u003e (Pleosporaceae), a major fungal pathogen of sunflowers, at a rate of 0.5L ha⁻\u0026sup1; in 144 liters of spray volume per hectare, with spraying equipment set at a pressure of 200 kPa, 0.5 m above the flowers, under windless conditions. After 15 minutes, the time needed for the spray to dry, the inflorescences were collected.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe pollen was collected in a plastic tray, upon which the inverted inflorescences were manually shaken. For the control group pollen, no fungicide spray was applied, and the pollen was collected immediately after inflorescence harvesting. The pollen was stored in 50 mL plastic tubes, which were stored in an ultrafreezer (-80\u0026ordm;C), until it was used in the preparation of the protein pastes for the bees.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDietary Management of Honey Bee Colonies\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEight Africanized honey bee (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e) colonies maintained in standard Langstroth hives were subjected to one of two dietary management systems for 24 weeks. In addition to the food freely collected in the field, four colonies had their diet supplemented (S) with 100g of protein paste, prepared with three parts of multifloral bee pollen and one part of wildflower honey, provided once a week, along with 500 mL of sucrose syrup made from water and crystallized cane sugar in equal proportions (w/w), offered twice a week.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dietary management for the second group involved restricted food availability (R) of the colonies by installing a pollen collector at the entrance of each hive. Colonies in this group did not receive any dietary supplementation. The colonies had naturally mated queens and at the beginning of the experiment were standardized with six frames of brood and four frames of food. The 24-week period was set to ensure that the bees used in the experiments experienced the nutritional management of the colonies during the brood stage, so that the data collected from the bees would not be influenced by the food stocks accumulated before the beggining of the colony treatments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePollen collection and efficiency of pollen collectors in colonies with restricted feeding\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBee pollen obtained from the pollen collectors installed in the hives of group R was collected daily during the 24 weeks of dietary management. After each collection, the pollen obtained from each hive was weighed on a semi-analytical balance. The weekly amount of pollen obtained from each hive was recorded.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo estimate the quantity of protein food available to the R colonies, the efficiency of the pollen collectors was determined. An observer stood near each pollen collector for 30 minutes, between 8 and 10 AM during three days, recording the number of bees returning from the field with pollen in their corbiculae. After this 30 minute period, the pollen pellets inside the pollen collector drawer were counted. Observations were conducted in triplicate for each hive. These data were used to determine the efficiency of the pollen collectors as described by Kato et al (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEvaluation of the weight of newly emerged bees\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter the dietary management period of the colonies, frames with bees about to emerge were obtained from all colonies to create a pool of bees originating from each dietary management (S and R). We used 100 individuals from each nutritional management group. The bees were placed in a freezer for one hour. Subsequently, samples of 10 bees each were placed in crucibles, with five replications, and dryed in an oven with air circulation at 105\u0026ordm;C for 16 hours (AOAC, 1990). Each group of 10 bees was weighed before and after the drying process.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eObtaining newly emerged bees, preparation of experimental diets and protein consumption\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe brood combs from which bees were obtained for weight evaluation of newly emerged bees. Combs with bees about to emerge were obtained from all colonies to create a pool of bees originating from each dietary management (S and R). These frames were placed in an incubator for 24 hours at 33\u0026ordm;C and 70% relative humidity. Subsequently, 0.25L round clear plastic countainers were used as cages to house 20 bees from the same dietary management group; container lids were perforated to allow gas exchange. An Eppendorf tube used as a syrup feeder was installed in the lid with access to food through an opening made with a needle, and another tube partially cut open with a knife was installed through the side of the cage for providing protein food.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe protein foods were formulated from a mixture containing three parts of freshly harvested sunflower pollen from flowers treated (F+) or untreated (F-) with the fungicide under study and one part wildflower honey. Sugar syrup was prepared containing two parts cane sugar and one part water. Daily replenishment of the food in the cages was provided, and the amount consumed of the protein food measured with an analytical balance in order to determine protein consumption.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAnalysis of oxidative stress in nurse honey bees\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the evaluation of oxidative metabolism, 320 bees were maintained in 16 cages for five days (2 dietary managements of colonies, 2 diets for the newly emerged bees, 4 repetitions, 20 bees per cage). The bees were kept in an incubator with controlled temperature (33\u0026deg;C) and humidity (70%). An extra cage with 20 bees for each treatment was used to replace any dead bees.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eObtaining and quantifying protein in the thorax homogenate\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter the period in which the bees received the experimental diets, the cages were placed in a freezer at -20\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC for a few minutes to anesthetize the bees. Subsequently, the thorax of the bee was separated from other body parts, including legs and wings, with the aid of fine tipped scissors (Hoskins et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1956\u003c/span\u003e). The thoraxes of bees from the same cage were placed in a mortar containing the isolation medium (250 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.2), kept at 4\u0026ordm;C, and macerated with a porcelain pestle. The resulting homogenate pool was filtered through gauze folded eight times. Total protein concentration was determined using the biuret reaction, according to Cain and Skilleter (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e), with bovine serum albumin (BSA) used as a standard.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEvaluation of antioxidant enzyme activity in the thorax homogenate\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGlutathione peroxidase (GPx) enzyme activity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGPx enzyme activity was determined by an indirect method based on oxidation of reduced glutathione (GSH) to oxidized glutathione (GSSG), catalyzed by GPx, and the subsequent oxidation of NADPH by GSSG (FLOH\u0026Eacute; and G\u0026Uuml;NZLER, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1984\u003c/span\u003e). The reaction volume was 1.5 mL containing: GSH 1.0 mM, NADPH 0.2 mM, H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e 0.25 mM, EDTA 0.5 mM, and sodium phosphate buffer 0.10 M (pH 7.6), along with the bee thorax homogenate (1 mg protein/mL). Enzymatic activity was evaluated at 30\u0026ordm;C in a Beckman-Coulter DU-800 spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 340 nm, and the oxidation of 1 \u0026micro;mol of NADPH/minute was considered one unit of glutathione peroxidase. Specific activity was expressed as units per mg of protein/minute.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCatalase enzyme (CAT) activity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEvaluation of catalase enzyme activity was measured in thorax homogenate (1 mg of protein) in 1.75 mL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7). The reaction was initiated by adding 200 \u0026micro;L of 10 mM H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. Catalase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to decompose 1 \u0026micro;mol of H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eper minute at 25\u0026deg;C and pH 7. Absorbance was read on a Beckman-Coulter model DU-800 spectrophotometer at 230 nm. Specific activity was expressed as units per mg of protein/minute (AEBI, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1974\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDetermination of non-enzymatic antioxidants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eReduced glutathione (GSH) concentration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGSH concentration in the thorax homogenate was measured according to Hissin and Hilf (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e), using 2 mL microtubes. The homogenate (1 mg of protein) was added to medium containing 125 mM sucrose, 65 mM KCl, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, to complete 1 mL. After gentle homogenization, 500 \u0026micro;L of 13% trichloroacetic acid was added. The mixture was shaken and then centrifuged at 9000 g for 3 minutes. In 5 mL test tubes, 1800 \u0026micro;L of buffer containing 0.1 M NaH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ePO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, pH 8.0, with 5 mM EDTA, 100 \u0026micro;L of the supernatant obtained from centrifugation, and 100 \u0026micro;L of OPT (o-phthalaldehyde) 1 mg/mL were added. The tubes were then shaken and kept in the dark at room temperature for 15 minutes. Reads were made in a Shimadzu RFPC 5301 spectrofluorometer, with a wavelength of 350 nm for emission and 420 nm for excitation, with a slit width of 3 mm in both cases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eOxidized glutathione (GSSG) concentration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the GSSG assay, 250 \u0026micro;L of the initial supernatant was treated with 250 \u0026micro;L of 0.04 M N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) and subjected to the same mixing procedure with OPT. The concentrations of GSH and GSSG were estimated using a standard curve.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eOxidative state of pyridine nucleotides (NAD(P)H)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eHomogenate samples (1 mg of protein/mL) were added to a reaction medium containing 125 mM sucrose, 65 mM KCl, and 10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, with a final volume of 2 mL. Reads were made on a Shimadzu RFPC 5301 spectrofluorometer, using 366 nm for excitation and 450 nm for emission. The results were expressed as Relative Fluorescence Units (RFU).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLipoperoxidation assessment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eLipid peroxidation was determined using the TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) method (Buege and Aust, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1978\u003c/span\u003e). The homogenate (5 mg of protein) was placed in test tubes, and 0.2 mL of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (8.1%), 1.5 mL of acetic acid (20%), and 1.5 mL of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) (0.67% aqueous solution) were added. The volume was completed to 4 mL with deionized water (milli-Q), and the mixture was placed in a water bath at 95\u0026deg;C for 60 minutes. After the incubation period, the tubes were removed and cooled in an ice bath. Then, 1 mL of milli-Q water was added, and the MDA-TBA complex was extracted with 5 mL of n-butanol. The tubes were centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 minutes, the organic phase was collected, and the absorbance was measured at 535 nm. The amount of lipid peroxidation was determined using the molar extinction coefficient of 1.56 x 10\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e M\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLongevity test\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the longevity test, 480 bees were used, with half from each nutritional management (S or R). Groups of 20 newly emerged individuals were placed in plastic cages and fed the same experimental diets used for evaluation of oxidative metabolism (2 colony nutritional managements, fed with pollen contaminated with fungicide (F+) or not (F-), with 6 replications). The number of dead bees was recorded daily until the death of the last bee. The cages were maintained in an incubator at 33\u0026ordm;C and 70% relative humidity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe weekly amount of honey bee pollen collected from the colonies of group R was recorded. The efficiency of the pollen collectors was determined based on three observations for each colony, and data dispersion was assessed through the standard error of the mean. The data collected for the evaluation of bee weight, not considering the factor related to fungicide contamination, as bees were weighed immediately after emergence, was analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA), and in cases where a significant effect was observed (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), pairwise mean comparisons were made using the Tukey test.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the analysis of each variable related to oxidative metabolism and protein consumption, a completely randomized design in a split-plot scheme with two factors was used: nutritional management of the colonies (supplemented \u0026ndash; S or restricted \u0026ndash; R) and adult bee protein diet (with fungicide \u0026ndash; F\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;or without fungicide \u0026ndash; F-), which were used to establish four treatments (SF+, SF-, RF+, RF-). The main factor, nutritional management, was applied first, followed by feeding the bees from the S or R colonies with protein (F\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;or F-). A mixed linear model was fitted considering the two factors as well as their interaction. The adjusted means for each treatment combination were compared using Tukey's test (5%).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor the assessment of bee longevity, we analyzed the results of the four treatments using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. Next, we used the hazard ratios for each factor to compare bee longevity across different treatments by fitting a Cox proportional hazards model. All analyses were conducted using SAS software (SAS Institute, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDietary Management and Pollen Collection\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the 24 weeks of dietary management of the colonies, honey bee pollen was collected daily from the colonies in the restricted diet group R). On average, 65.23\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.35g of bee pollen was obtained weekly per colony. Throughout the experimental period, 1,171.27 to 1,828.42g of pollen was collected per colony. In the group of colonies supplemented weekly (S), 2,400g of protein paste containing 1,800g of bee pollen was provided to each colony during the same period.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mean efficiency of the pollen collectors was 61.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;4.8%. Thus, considering the amount of pollen collected with the pollen traps, the estimated quantity of this proteinaceous food that was brought into the colonies over the 24 weeks ranged from 454.80 to 709.98g. Weekly, the available amount of pollen for each colony in the restricted diet group (R) was estimated to be 18.95 to 29.58g.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eWeight of newly emerged bees\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe live weight of bees from colonies with dietary supplementation did not differ significantly from that of bees from colonies with restricted feeding (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). After sample drying, it was observed that the dry matter content and the dry matter: original matter ratio were higher in bees from well-fed colonies (S) compared to bees from nutritionally restricted colonies (R).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMean live weight, dry weight in mg, and dry weight/live weight ratio of newly emerged bees obtained from colonies with supplemented or restricted food availability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffects\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLive weight (LW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDry weight (DW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDW:LW\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupplemented\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e82.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.06 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21.83 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRestricted\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e79.37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.53 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19.57 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSE\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.54\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.46\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eP value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.178\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.004\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeans followed by different letters in the same column differ significantly from each other (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), according to the Tukey test. Means for 10 individuals from each colony.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eProtein food consumption during five days and oxidative metabolism\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe consumption of protein paste by the bees in the cages was influenced by the interaction between the nutritional management of the colonies from which the bees were obtained and the applicationi of fungicide to the sunflowers from which the pollen was obtained (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Bees from supplemented colonies that received protein paste containing sunflower pollen from inflorescences untreated with fungicide (SF-) consumed a significantly more protein diet compared to bees from restricted diet colonies that received the same food. These bees (RF) consumed more protein paste than the others (SF\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;and RF+), which did not differ from each other. Fungicide contamination of the food led to a reduction in food consumption, both in bees from colonies with nutritional supplementation and in those with less available protein food during the brood phase.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eGlutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe activity of the GPx enzyme was influenced by nutritional management and pollen treatment with fungicide (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e), being higher in bees that had more food available for their development during the brood phase (S) in comparison with R, and that ingested protein food without fungicide (F-), compared to bees that ingested the contaminated diet F+.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCatalase (CAT) enzyme activity:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe activity of the catalase enzyme was influenced by the interaction of nutritional condition of the colony of origen with fungicide contamination of the pollen that they consumed, with a reduction in its activity in bees from group SF\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;compared to bees from other treatments, which did not differ from each other (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eReduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) concentrations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe concentration of reduced glutathione and oxidized glutathione was higher in bees obtained from S compaed to those from R colonies. No effect of the fungicide was observed for the concentration of non-enzymatic antioxidants. No difference in the ratio between GSH and GSSG concentrations was observed for bees from the four treatments, indicating that there was no alteration in the oxidative state of glutathione, when considering the factors nutritional management of the colonies and ingestion of food contaminated with fungicide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec27\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eOxidative State in Pyridine Nucleotides (NAD(P)H)\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe concentration of NAD(P)H in the thorax homogenate was higher in bees from colonies that had their diet supplemented (S) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). No effect of the fungicide in pollen fed to the caged bees was observed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEvaluation of Lipoperoxidation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the analysis of lipid peroxidation through the quantification of malondialdehyde (MDA), it was observed that pollen contaminated with fungicide led to an increase in lipoperoxidation levels (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). This oxidation was not influenced by the dietary management in the colonies from which the newly emerged bees were obtained.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndividual consumption of protein paste over five days, activity of antioxidant enzymes, and parameters related to oxidative stress in the thorax homogenate of bees after the feeding period.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"10\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffects\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsumption\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(mg/bee)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGPx\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(mU/mg\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eof protein)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCAT\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(\u0026micro;mol/mg of protein/min)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGSH\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(nmol/mg\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eof protein)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGSSG (nmol/mg\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eof protein)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGSH/\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGSSG\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNAD(P)H (Relative Fluorescence Units)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMDA (nmol/mg\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eof protein)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSupplemented (S)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.973\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e127.570 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.065\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.453 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.067 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22.144\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.873 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.197\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRestricted (R)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.968\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92.725 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30.785\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.477 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.098 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26.471\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.630 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.188\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungicide\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith fungicide (F+)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.716\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e104.400 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.705\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.928\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.077\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25.289\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.750\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.200 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithout fungicide (F-)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.223\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e115.890 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31.145\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.002\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.088\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.325\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.758\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.185 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSF+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.823 c\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e126.800\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.523 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.423\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.070 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20.973\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.870\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.210\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInteraction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSF-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15.122 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e128.330\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29.607 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.483\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.063 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.317\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.877\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.183\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRF+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.608 c\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e82.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28.887 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.433\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.083 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29.608\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.630\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.190\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRF-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.325 b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e103.440\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32.683 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.520\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.114 a\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.333\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.640\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.187\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStandard error of the mean\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.533\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.089\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.064\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.187\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.010\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.470\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.047\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSource of variation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProbability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeding (a)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungicide (b)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.030\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.043\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInteraction (a x b)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.052\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.140\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.095\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.200\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.098\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMeans followed by the same letter for the same effect (bee feeding or use of fungicide on sunflower plants or interaction between these factors) for each variable do not differ significantly from each other (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), according to the Tukey test. Food consisting of three parts of sunflower pollen treated or not with the fungicide Fox Xpro and one part honey.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLongevity of workers\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBee survival was affected by the feeding management to which the colonies of origin were subjected and contamination of the diet fed to the caged bees with fungicide (\u0026#119883;\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40.167, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.0001; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The longevity of bees that developed during the larval stage in supplemented colonies and received uncontaminated food with fungicide in the adult stage (15.20\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.34 days) was greater than that of bees from the same colonies that were fed fungicide-contaminated food in the adult stage (12.88\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.33 days). Bees that developed in colonies with restricted feeding and received uncontaminated food in the adult stage had a mean survival of 13.04\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.36 days. Longevity was lowest for bees from colonies with restricted feeding that received fungicide-contaminated food in the adult stage (12.08\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.27 days).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen considering the hazard ratios for each factor evaluated, we observed that fungicide (F+) in the bees diet results in lower survival of bees from R colonies compared to bees from S colonies (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Even when bees were treated with pollen without fungicide (F-), the survival of bees from S colonies was significantly higher than bees from R colonies. Regarding the effect of fungicide within each nutritional management group, we observed that for both S and R bee groups, survival was lower due to exposure to food containing pollen from inflorescences treated with fungicide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChi-square, P values and hazard ratios for dietary management of honey bee colonies (S for supplemented and R for restricted feeding) and presence of fungicide in protein paste provided to the bees (F\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;means with fungicide and F- without fungicide).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffect\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChi-Square\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePr\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;ChiSq\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSE\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeding\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.0595\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0439\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1367\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFungicide\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.8742\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.0003\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1361\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeding x Fungicide\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.3744\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5406\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.1928\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"4\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHazard Ratios\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePoint estimate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConfidence Limits\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eS x R at F+\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.759\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.581\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.993\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eS x R at F-\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.675\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.517\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.881\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;x F- at S\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.630\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.248\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.128\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eF\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;x F- at R\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.448\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.105\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.900\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eAccording to Corona et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), nutritional stress significantly contributes to weakening and loss of colonies; it is intrinsically linked to colony health and vigor, habitat degradation, pollen diversity, and innate foraging differences among bees from different colonies. Pollen deprivation induces bees to forage early, which is associated with accelerated aging and reduced longevity of these insects (Perry et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Corona et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). With food restriction, colonies undergo a population adjustment to balance pollen demand and supply. In our experiment, the estimated amount of food that bees were able to bring into the hives is compatible with the minimum amount needed to maintain about 4,000 individuals, considered a small colony of honey bees (Danner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). The weight of bees can be influenced by increased food availability, resulting in positive effects on the health and longevity of adult bees, provided that the diet is nutritionally balanced (Ihle et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). In our study, the weight of bees upon emerging from the combs was favored by the more suitable nutritional conditions of colonies with food supplementation (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuring the brood phase, honey bees require 125 to 187 mg of pollen. As adults, about 3.9 mg of pollen is needed daily, with peaks during the nurse bee phase (Brodschneider and Crailsheim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). In this phase, consumption is higher to ensure the proper development of the hypopharyngeal glands. In our study, newly emerged bees from the SF- treatment consumed about 2.27 mg of sunflower pollen per day during the first five days of life (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBees from colonies subjected to food restriction consumed less food than those that developed in an environment with greater food availability during the brood phase, considering sunflower pollen untreated with fungicide (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, it is considered that food restriction during the brood phase hinders the development of the bee in the adult phase, with no compensatory gain in food consumption during adulthood. Larvae reared during deficiency of an essential nutrient may become adults with lower survival or impaired brood care and foraging skills (Brodschneider and Crailsheim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBee bread is useful as a source of antioxidants that protect cells against oxidative damage to the cytoplasmic structure within cellular organelles and in the extracellular fluid (Martinello and Mutinelli, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Bee bread from different botanical sources has different antioxidant capacities, more related to specific profiles of flavones and phenolic acids (Borycka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e), highlighting the importance of protein nutrition for the physiological well-being of bees (Wright et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFood contamination with fungicide caused reduced food consumption, independent of their being from well fed or nutritionally deprived colonies. The sensitivity of bees to pesticides may be linked to the life stage of the bee (Zhu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), as changes occur in endocrine and metabolic activity during behavioral maturation related to age, inherent to the transition from nursing tasks to foraging (Robinson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Forager bees show higher detoxifying enzymatic activity than bees working solely within the colony (Smirle and Robinson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e; Berenbaum and Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). However, it seems that susceptibility among castes depends on the type of pesticide being evaluated, as some active ingredients are more toxic to foragers in comparison with nurse bees (Barascou et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSunflower pollen has been indicated in some studies as having lower nutritional quality compared to various other types of pollen (Schmidt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e), with low protein content (Radev, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), and low levels of two essential amino acids for honey bees, methionine and tryptophan, below the minimum required by bees (Nicolson and Human, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Pollen has a complex chemical composition, including amino acids, lipids, sugars, secondary metabolites, and other elements (Palmer-Young et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Indeed, plant secondary compounds have stood out for their potential positive impacts on pollinators, including protective action against pesticide exposure (Ardalani et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Bee foraging on various plant species favors obtaining a more balanced and nutrient-rich diet (Vaudo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). The hypothesis that adequate nutrition can protect animals against the adverse effects of stressors, such as pesticides, is a well-established perspective in biology (Wahl and Ulm, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntioxidant defense systems in honey bees encompass both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms, both crucial for mitigating damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Corona et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Among the antioxidant enzymes, glutathione S-transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) are noteworthy. Simultaneously, non-enzymatic components such as glutathione, NAD(P)H, and vitamins C and E, actively participate in neutralizing ROS (Badiou-B\u0026eacute;n\u0026eacute;teau et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Tawfik et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGPx activity was higher in the thoracic homogenate of bees that consumed more food. According to Wahl and Ulm (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e), sensitivity to oxidative stress in bees is reduced with improved pollen quality. Therefore, considering the low quality of sunflower pollen (Radev, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e), we presumed that lower food consumption implies lower activity of this enzyme. A reduction in GPx enzyme activity observed in bees exposed to food contaminated with fungicide may be due to a reduction in energy availability in cells, given the inhibition of the respiratory chain inherent to the action of the active principles bixafen and trifloxystrobin (Bartlett et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e; Oliver and Hewitt, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Nicodemo et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCAT enzyme activity was only altered in the SF\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;group, which was lower than in the other groups. Even though there was no significant difference in food consumption between SF\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;and RF+, it is suggested that the slightly higher consumption in the former group may have resulted in a more effective action of the active principles bixafen and trifloxystrobin in reducing cellular work capacity. In this sense, the antioxidant defense would not neutralize the levels of ROS generated by exposure to the fungicide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe GSH:GSSG ratio is recognized as a fundamental indicator of intracellular redox balance and antioxidant capacity. In our study, this ratio was not affected by the nutritional management of the colonies of origin of the bees or by feeding on food contaminated with fungicide. The concentration of NAD(P)H was higher in bees that consumed more food, with no effect detected of the pesticide, considering the exposure level, which was according to the fungicide application protocol. These results may differ from those obtained in other investigations (Kapoor et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Bal et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Chakrabarti et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) regarding the impact of pesticides on the concentration of these non-enzymatic oxidants. However, the differences between populations, doses, and exposure modes used in each of the works should be considered.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA significant increase in lipid peroxidation levels, evidenced by the marker MDA, was observed in samples of bees fed pollen from inflorescences exposed to the triple-action fungicide, regardless of the dietary management of the colony of origin of the bees. The active principle protioconazole blocks the sterol biosynthesis pathway, which is fundamental for the organization and structuring of cell membranes (Schuhmann et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Lipoperoxidation is recognized as a sign of cellular damage and oxidative stress, which can affect bee cells exposed to xenobiotics (Balieira et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegarding longevity, we observed that the fungicide affected bee longevity. Bees that developed in supplemented colonies during the brood phase and did not receive contaminated food during adulthood lived 16.6% longer than bees that had restricted feeding during the brood phase and received uncontaminated food. The greatest impacts on bee survival were observed when bees developed during the brood phase in colonies with food restriction and, during adulthood, received food contaminated with fungicide, with a 20.5% reduction in the average survival of workers compared to the longer-lived bees (SF-), highlighting the synergistic effect between food restriction and exposure to fungicide.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe longevity of honey bees is reduced when exposed to pesticides; however, the presence of some phytochemicals in food, even those without nutritional value, can mitigate the effects on bee survival (Liao et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The availability of food in greater quantity (Mattos et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; H\u0026yacute;bl et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) and of higher quality (Castle et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Costa et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) can favor the health and survival of bees exposed to pesticides. Despite the use of the pesticide according to application protocols, there was damage to the health of these insects. Therefore, it is suggested that the recommendation for the use of this fungicide during the flowering period of target crops be reconsidered.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFeeding pollen from sunflowers sparyed with a commercial fungicide containing bixafen, prothioconazole and trifloxystrobin caused oxidative stress in honey bees, even though the application was made in accordance with agronomic recommendations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBee survival was adversely affected by exposure to fungicide, with a synergistic effect on bees from colonies subjected to food restriction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis research was supported by grants from Funda\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o de Amparo \u0026agrave; Pesquisa do Estado de S\u0026atilde;o Paulo - FAPESP (process n\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e 2021/00702-1) to Daniel Nicodemo and by the Coordena\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o de Aperfei\u0026ccedil;oamento de Pessoal de N\u0026iacute;vel Superior-Brasil (CAPES)-Finance Code 001 to Thais Regina Ramos Alves.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch1\u003e \u003c/h1\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel Nicodemo reports financial support was provided by FAPESP. All the authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTRRA, MFT, TALF, AYK, CRAG, YMMF, JAS and CAM: data collection. DN, DDJ, FEM, EPP and EFV: research design. DN and TGP: data analysis. DN, ROO, FEM and DDJ: manuscript writing. \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAebi H (1974) Catalase In: Bergmeyer HU (ed.) Methods of enzymatic analysis. Academic Press, New York, pp. 673-684\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC] (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Washington, DC: Author\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eArdalani H, Vidkj\u0026aelig;r NH, Kryger P, Fiehn O, Fomsgaard IS (2021) Metabolomics unveils the influence of dietary phytochemicals on residual pesticide concentrations in honey bees. Environ Int, 152, 106503\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAylanc V, Falc\u0026atilde;o SI, Ertosun S, Vilas-Boas M (2021) From the hive to the table: Nutrition value, digestibility and bioavailability of the dietary phytochemicals present in bee pollen and bee bread. Trends Food Sci, 109:464-481\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBadiou-B\u0026eacute;n\u0026eacute;teau A, Carvalho SM, Brunet JL, Carvalho, GA, Bulet\u0026eacute; A, Giroud B, Belzunces LP (2012) Development of biomarkers of exposure to xenobiotics in the honeybee \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e: Application to the systemic insecticide thiamethoxam. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 82:22-31\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBal R, T\u0026uuml;rk G, Tuzcu M et al (2012) Assessment of imidacloprid toxicity on reproductive organ system of adult male rats. J Environ Sci Health B 47(5):434-444\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBalieira KVB, Mazzo M, Bizzerra PFV, Guimar\u0026atilde;es ARJS, Nicodemo D, Mingatto FE (2018) Imidacloprid-induced oxidative stress in honey bees and the antioxidant action of caffeine. Apidol, 49:562\u0026ndash;572\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBarascou, L; Sene, D; Le Conte, Y; Alaux, C (2022) Pesticide risk assessment: honeybee workers are not all equal regarding the risk posed by exposure to pesticides. \u003cem\u003eEnviron Sci Pollut Res,\u003c/em\u003e 29: 90328\u0026ndash;90337\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBartlett DW, Clough JM, Godwin JR, Hall AA, Hamer M, Parr-Dobrzanski B (2002) The strobilurin fungicides. Pest Manag Sci, 58:649\u0026ndash;662\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBatista AC, Domingues CEC, Costa MJ, Silva-Zacarin ECM (2020) Is a strobilurin fungicide capable of inducing histopathological effects on the midgut and Malpighian tubules of honey bees? J Apic Res, 59(5):834-843\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBayer. (2019). Fox\u0026reg; Xpro: Fungicida. S\u0026atilde;o Paulo: Bayer S. A. Retrieved from https://www.agro.bayer.com.br/d/fungicida-bcs-fox-xpro-br\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBerenbaum MR, Johnson RM (2015) Xenobiotic detoxification pathways in honey bees. Curr Opin Insect Sci, 10:51-58\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eB\u0026ouml;hme F, Bischoff G, Zebitz CPW, Rosenkranz P, Wallner K (2017) Chronic exposure of honeybees, \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e (Hymenoptera: Apidae), to a pesticide mixture in realistic field exposure rates. Apidol, 48:353-363\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBorycka K, Grabek-Lejko D, Kasprzyk I (2015) Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of commercial bee pollen products. J Apic Res, 54(5): 491-502\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBrodschneider R, Crailsheim K (2010) Nutrition and health in honey bees. Apidol, 41(3):278-294\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBuege JA, Aust SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol, 52:302-310\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCain K, Skilleter DN (1987) Preparation and use of mitochondria in toxicological research. In Snell K, Mullock B (Eds.), Biochemical Toxicology, : IRL Press, Oxford pp. 217\u0026ndash;254\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCantarella H, Mattos Jr D, Boaretto RM, Quaggio JA, Raij BV (2022) Recomenda\u0026ccedil;\u0026otilde;es de aduba\u0026ccedil;\u0026atilde;o e calagem para o Estado de S\u0026atilde;o Paulo (2\u0026ordf; ed.). Instituto Agron\u0026ocirc;mico, Campinas.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCarneiro LS, Mart\u0026iacute;nez LC, Gon\u0026ccedil;alves WG, Santana LM, Serr\u0026atilde;o JE (2020) The fungicide iprodione affects midgut cells of non-target worker honey bees \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 189: 109991.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCastle D, Alkassab AT, Bischoff G, Steffan-Dewenter I, Pistorius J (2022) High nutritional status promotes vitality of honey bees and mitigates negative effects of pesticides. Sci Total Environ, 806:151280\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChakrabarti P, Rana S, Sarkar S, Smith B, Basu P (2015) Pesticide-induced oxidative stress in laboratory and field populations of native honey bees along intensive agricultural landscapes in two Eastern Indian states. Apidol, 46(1):107-129\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCizelj I, Glavan G, Božič J, Oven I, Mrak V, Narat M (2016) Prochloraz and coumaphos induce different gene expression patterns in three developmental stages of the Carniolan honey bee (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera carnica\u003c/em\u003e Pollmann). Pestic Biochem Physiol, 128:68-75\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCorona M, Branchiccela B, Alburaki M, Palmer-Young EC, Madella S, Chen Y, Evans JD (2023) Decoupling the effects of nutrition, age, and behavioral caste on honey bee physiology, immunity, and colony health. Front Physiol, 14:1149840\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCosta CP, Leza M, Duennes MA, Fisher K, Vollaro A, Hur M, Kirkwood JS, Woodard SH (2022) Pollen diet mediates how pesticide exposure impacts brain gene expression in nest-founding bumble bee queens. Sci Total Environ, 833, 155216.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDanner N, Keller A, H\u0026auml;rtel S, Steffan-Dewenter I (2017) Honey bee foraging ecology: Season but not landscape diversity shapes the amount and diversity of collected pollen. PLoS One, 12(8):e0183716\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFisher A, Carvalho CU, Coleman C, Hoffmann C et al (2017) Synergistic effects of almond protective fungicides on the survival of bee foragers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Econ Entomol, 110:802-808\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFisher A, Degrandi-Hoffman G, Liao LH et al (2023) The challenge of balancing fungicide use and pollinator health. In: Harrison JF (Ed.), Adv Insect Physiol, 64:117-190\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFloh\u0026eacute; L, G\u0026uuml;nzler WA (1984) Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol, 105:114-121\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHern\u0026aacute;ndez J, Riveros AJ, Amaya-M\u0026aacute;rquez M (2021) Sublethal doses of glyphosate impair olfactory memory retention, but not learning in the honey bee (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera scutellata\u003c/em\u003e). J Insect Conser, 25:683\u0026ndash;694\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eH\u0026yacute;bl M, Mr\u0026aacute;z P, \u0026Scaron;ipo\u0026scaron; J, Ho\u0026scaron;tičkov\u0026aacute; I, Bohat\u0026aacute; A, Čurn V, Kopec T (2021) Polyphenols as food supplement improved food consumption and longevity of honey bees (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e) intoxicated by pesticide thiacloprid. Insects, 12(7):572\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHissin PJ, Hilf R (1976) A fluorometric method for determination of oxidized and reduced glutathione in tissues. Anal Biochem, 74(1):214-226\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHoskins DD, Cheldelin VH, Newburgh RW (1956) Oxidation enzyme systems of the honey bee, \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e L. J Gen Physiol, 39(5):705\u0026ndash;713\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIhle KE, Baker NA, Amdam GV (2014) Insulin-like peptide response to nutritional input in honey bee workers. J Insect Physiol, 69:49-55\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKato AY, Freitas TAL, Gomes, CRA, Alves TRR, Ferraz YMM, Trivellato MF, De Jong D, Biller JD, Nicodemo D (2024) Bixafen, prothioconazole, and trifloxystrobin alone or in combination have a greater effect on health related gene expression in honey bees from nutritionally deprived than from protein supplemented colonies. Insects, 15:523.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKapoor U, Srivastava MK, Srivastava LP (2011) Toxicological impact of technical imidacloprid on ovarian morphology, hormones and antioxidant enzymes in female rats. Food Cheml Toxicol, 49:3086\u0026ndash;3089\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKlein AM, Vaissi\u0026egrave;re BE, Cane J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 274:303\u0026ndash; 313\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLiao LH, Wu WY, Berenbaum MR (2017) Behavioral responses of honey bees (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e) to natural and synthetic xenobiotics in food. Sci Rep, 7:15924\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLiao LH, Pearlstein DJ, Wu WY, Kelley AG, Montag WM, Hsieh EM, Berenbaum MR (2020) Increase in longevity and amelioration of pesticide toxicity by natural levels of dietary phytochemicals in the honey bee, \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e. PLoS ONE, 15(12):e0243364\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMao W, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR (2017) Disruption of quercetin metabolism by fungicide affects energy production in honey bees (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e). Proc Natl Acad Sci, 114(10):2538-2543\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMartinello M, Mutinelli F (2021) Antioxidant activity in bee products: A review. Antioxidants, 10(1):71\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMattos IM, Soares AEE, Tarpy DR (2017) Mitigating effects of pollen during paraquat exposure on gene expression and pathogen prevalence in \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e L. Ecotoxicol, 27(1):32-44\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMucci CA, Ramirez L, Giffoni RS, Lammattina L (2021) Cold stress induces specific antioxidant responses in honey bee brood. Apidol, 52: 596\u0026ndash;607\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNicodemo D, Mingatto FE, De Jong D et al (2020) Mitochondrial respiratory inhibition promoted by pyraclostrobin in fungi is also observed in honey bees. Environ Toxicol Chem, 39(6):1267-1272\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNicolson, SW, Human H (2013) Chemical composition of the \u0026lsquo;low quality\u0026rsquo; pollen of sunflower (\u003cem\u003eHelianthus annuus\u003c/em\u003e, Asteraceae). Apidol, 44:144\u0026ndash;152\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOliver R, Hewitt HG (2014) Fungicides in crop protection (2\u003csup\u003end\u003c/sup\u003e ed.). CABI, Boston\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePalmer-Young EC, Farrell IW, Adler LS, Milano NJ, Egan PA, Irwin RE, Stevenson PC (2019) Secondary metabolites from nectar and pollen: a resource for ecological and evolutionary studies. Ecol, 100(4):e02621\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePerry C, S\u0026oslash;vik E, Myerscough MR, Barron AB (2015) Rapid behavioral maturation accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 112:3427\u0026ndash;3432\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePoquet Y, Vidau C, Alaux C (2016) Modulation of pesticide response in honeybees. Apidol, 47:412\u0026ndash;426\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePotts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Ngo HT et al (2016) Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nat, 540:220\u0026ndash;229\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePrado A, Pioz M, Vidau C, Requier F, Jury M, Crauser D, Alaux C (2019) Exposure to pollen-bound pesticide mixtures induces longer-lived but less efficient honey bees. Sci Total Environ, 650:1250\u0026ndash;1260\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eQuinlan GM, Grozinger CM (2023) Honey bee nutritional ecology: From physiology to landscapes. Adv Insect Physiol, 64:289-345\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRadev Z (2019) Pollen protein content from different regions in Bulgaria suggests low variability. Bee World, 96(4):108\u0026ndash;110\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRobinson GE (2002) Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. Am Nat, 160(Supp. 6):160\u0026ndash;S172\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRondeau S, Raine NE (2022) Fungicides and bees: a review of exposure and risk. Environ Int, 165:107311\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSAS Institute Inc. (2024). SAS OnDemand for Academics (Vers\u0026atilde;o 9.4) [Software].\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDispon\u0026iacute;vel em https://www.sas.com/pt_br/software/on-demand-for-academics.html\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchmidt JO, Thoenes SC, Levin MD (1987) Survival of honey bees, \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e (Hymenoptera: Apidae), fed various pollen sources. J Econ Entomol, 80:176\u0026ndash;183\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchuhmann A, Schmid AP, Manzer S, Schulte J, Scheiner R (2022) Interaction of insecticides and fungicides in bees. Front Insect Sci, 1:808335\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSies H, Berndt C, Jones DP (2017) Oxidative Stress. Annu Rev Biochem, 86:715-748\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSmirle MJ, Robinson GE (1989) Behavioral status and detoxifying enzyme activity are related in worker honey bees. J Insect Behav, 2:285-289\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTadei R, Domingues CEC, Malaquias JB, Camilo EV, Malaspina O Silva-Zacarin ECM (2019) Late effect of larval co-exposure to the insecticide clothianidin and fungicide pyraclostrobin in Africanized \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e. Sci Rep, 9(1): 3277\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTawfik AI, Ahmed ZH, Abdel-Rahman MF, Moustafa AM (2020) Influence of winter feeding on colony development and the antioxidant system of the honey bee, \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e. J Apic Res, 59:752-763\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTong L, Nieh JC, Tosi S (2019) Combined nutritional stress and a new systemic pesticide (flupyradifurone, Sivanto\u0026reg;) reduce bee survival, food consumption, flight success, and thermoregulation. Chemosphere, 237:124408\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVaudo AD, Tooker JF, Grozinger CM, Patch HM (2015) Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration. Curr Opin Insect Sci, 10:133-141\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWahl O, Ulm K (1983) Influence pollen feeding and physiological condition on pesticide sensitivity of the honey bee \u003cem\u003eApis mellifera carnica\u003c/em\u003e. Oecologia, 59:106\u0026ndash;128\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWickramasinghe K, Mathers JC, Wopereis S, Marsman DS, Griffiths JC (2020) From lifespan to healthspan: The role of nutrition in healthy ageing. J Nutri Sci, 9:e33\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWright GA, Nicolson SW, Shafir S (2018) Nutritional physiology and ecology of honey bees. Annu Rev Entomol, 63:327-344\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhu YC, Caren J, Reddy GVP, Li W, Yao J (2020) Effect of age on insecticide susceptibility and enzymatic activities of three detoxification enzymes and one invertase in honey bee workers (\u003cem\u003eApis mellifera\u003c/em\u003e). Comp Biochem Physiol C, 238:108844\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"bixafen, nutrition, prothioconazole, redox, trifloxystrobin","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4836495/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4836495/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThere is increasing evidence that besides insecticides, fungicides also affect bee health. However, there has been little research on how bees are affected by recently developed modern fungicides that contain various active ingredients to help overcome fungal pathogen resistance. Experiments were conducted to determine how this type of fungicide affects bees and whether annutritional supplements can ameliorate eventual negative impacts for bees. Newly-emerged bees from well fed and from nutritionally restricted honey bee colonies were maintained in groups of 20 in plastic cages in an incubator and fed for five days with pollen from sunflower plants that had been sprayed or not during flowering with a three-component commercial fungicide containing bixafen, prothioconazole and trifloxystrobin. Bees from the well-fed colonies were significantly larger and consumed more uncontaminated pollen in the cage tests. They also had increased glutathione peroxidase activity and higher concentrations of pyridine nucleotides. Feeding on the fungicide-contaminated pollen resulted in decreased catalase activity of bees from well-fed colonies and damage to cell membranes of bees indepent of nutritional condition. Bee longevity was reduced by both fungicide contamination of the pollen diet and poor nutritional condition of the donor colony. In conclusion, the triple action commercial fungicide adversely affected bees fed with contaminated pollen, though nutritional supplementation of bee colonies that provided the bees partially compensated for these effects.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Pollen contaminated with a triple-action fungicide induced oxidative stress and reduced bee longevity though with less impact on lifespan in bees from well fed colonies","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-08-28 10:44:07","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4836495/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"35959534-fa87-4220-a374-83481d403160","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 28th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-09-02T15:05:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-08-28 10:44:07","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4836495","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4836495","identity":"rs-4836495","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}