Working Memory of Multi-Object Scenes in Primate Frontal Cortex

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,824 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Working memory allows primates to reason about complex scenes, yet how the brain maintains multiple objects in memory simultaneously remains unclear. Competing theories propose that objects are stored in discrete slots1,2, represented dynamically through switching3–6, or encoded by weighted combinations of single-object representations7–11. We formalized these hypotheses in terms of their quantitative predictions at the level of single neurons and tested them against densely recorded neural data from the dorsomedial frontal cortex and frontal eye field of monkeys trained to perform a novel multi-object working-memory task. Across cross-validated neural data, a Gain model, where population activity reflects weighted compositions of individual object responses, consistently outperformed Slot and Switching models. Trial-specific gain estimates predicted behavioral errors and reaction times, indicating that these latent weights capture meaningful fluctuations in memory fidelity. All results replicated in an independent dataset with different spatial configurations. Together, our work provides a rigorous framework to adjudicate a longstanding debate about how the frontal cortex retains multiple objects, identifying a weighted-sum representation as the format that best explains the neural data. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Open-Sourced Data and Code We have open-sourced all of our data and code, as well as instructions for reproducing our results and demo scripts for becoming familiar with our data. For the code, instructions, and demo scripts, visit https://github.com/jazlab/multi_object_memory_2025. For our data, visit https://dandiarchive.org/dandiset/000620. Minor edits to cover page to clarify open-sourced code and data access.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00