Urinary biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic literature review

Wioletta Dolińska, Lara Othman, Guinn, Barbara
2021 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5651228 · W4393730462
Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 ⓘ

This systematic literature review evaluated urine biomarkers for the non-invasive detection of endometriosis by analyzing studies indexed with specific MeSH terms up to August 2021.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 · read from full text ⓘ

This systematic literature review evaluated the diagnostic potential of urinary biomarkers for detecting endometriosis, addressing a research question focused on their sensitivity and specificity. The study utilized Medical Subject Heading terms to identify relevant publications up to August 2021, compiling data into an open-access dataset for further analysis. By aggregating existing evidence, the authors aimed to determine if non-invasive urine-based testing could serve as a viable alternative to current diagnostic methods. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically investigating non-invasive diagnostic tools through a systematic review of urinary biomarkers.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Raw dataset from a systematic literature review performed until August 2021 in which the research question was 'Are there urine biomarkers sensitive and specific enough for endometriosis detection?' and the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms were (endometrios*) AND (urin*).
Full text 642 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Published November 9, 2021 | Version v1 Dataset Open Urinary biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic literature review Authors/Creators - 1. University of Hull - 2. Hull York Medical School Description Raw dataset from a systematic literature review performed until August 2021 in which the research question was 'Are there urine biomarkers sensitive and specific enough for endometriosis detection?' and the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms were (endometrios*) AND (urin*). Files Files (605.5 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:20b2a09dbc011eb4be058f57812512a9 | 605.5 kB | Download |

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK