Machine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 147,506 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Machine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Machine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation Ana Rebeka Kamšek, Francisco Ruiz-Zepeda, Domen Tabernik, Jan Vidergar, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7656978/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Deep mechanistic insight into electrocatalyst stability is essential to design durable, resource-efficient fuel cells. Nanoparticulate electrocatalysts degrade via diverse nanoscale processes, yet particle-to-particle heterogeneity in structure, support interaction, and local microenvironment make true particle-level quantification and understanding impossible with classical approaches. Here we scale up identical-location scanning transmission electron microscopy to track the structural evolution of hundreds of carbon-supported Pt–Co nanoparticles, a prototypical oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst. We present a three-step image analysis workflow comprising segmentation, tracking, and degradation-event classification with progressive automation, including machine-learning-assisted segmentation of overlapping particles. By pairing nanoscale resolution and local history with population-level statistics, the pipeline enables unbiased identification and quantification of degradation pathways across statistically meaningful particle sets. We reveal clear particle size- and shape-dependent effects, showing that smaller and irregular nanoparticles are more prone to detachment. Together, these advances provide a data-driven framework for probing electrocatalyst degradation at scale, informing the rational design of next-generation materials. electrocatalysis identical-location electron microscopy nanoparticles catalyst degradation image analysis Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Main Hydrogen technologies present a promising alternative to fossil fuels, with the potential to decarbonize both transport and stationary power generation. In the clean hydrogen cycle, hydrogen is produced via water electrolysis and then converted to electricity in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), where hydrogen reacts with oxygen to form water. 1 The inherently sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) requires a catalyst, and PEMFC operation also depends on external conditions such as humidity and temperature. 2 High cost remains a major barrier to PEMFC commercialization, largely due to the reliance on platinum, as Pt-based nanoparticles on carbon supports are widely used as ORR electrocatalysts. Optimal catalyst layers must balance platinum utilization, conductivity, and mass transport, while delivering high activity and durability. 3 A similar constraint applies to low-temperature electrolyzers, which also employ Pt. Alloying Pt with a cheaper transition metal (M = Cu, Co, Ni, or Fe) reduces platinum content and can even enhance activity by tuning the electronic structure. 4 – 6 In practice, real catalyst batches contain nanoparticles with heterogeneous size, shape, and composition, 7–11 making them more complex than model systems used for theoretical predictions. 6 , 12 – 14 Despite progress in activity and cost reduction, durability remains the key challenge for Pt–M electrocatalysts. 6 Stable catalysts must retain their structure and composition under operating conditions, yet several degradation mechanisms (dissolution, detachment, agglomeration, Ostwald ripening, and support corrosion) commonly affect Pt–M/C systems. 8 , 15 , 16 These processes are often interlinked. Carbon corrosion can lead to particle detachment or agglomeration, lowering the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), while dissolution enables Ostwald ripening. 15 Aside from that, all systematic changes to the catalyst structure can be understood as degradation mechanisms – particle migration, surface roughening, amorphization, surface oxidation, and others. 17 , 18 Because individual nanoparticles differ in atomic structure, composition, support anchoring, and local microenvironment, degradation is intrinsically particle-specific and therefore difficult to resolve with bulk or sparsely sampled measurements. 19 , 20 Understanding nanoparticle degradation requires correlating structural features with external stimuli. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) can provide local and highly precise surface and near-surface structural information down to the atomic scale. 21 , 22 Random-location ex situ studies provide particle size distributions and statistics across many nanoparticles, 23–25 but yield only averaged insights. In situ liquid-cell TEM offers real-time observation of degradation, 26 yet faces challenges such as beam effects and limited spatial resolution. 16 Identical-location STEM (IL-STEM) addresses these limitations by imaging the same nanoparticles before and after electrochemical treatment. This enables direct knowledge of local history, providing reliable insights into degradation pathways. 6 IL-(S)TEM was already proven as effective in studying the structure-stability relationship of electrocatalysts, 27–32 including Pt-Co systems, where potential cycling revealed dissolution and redeposition at specific sites. 33 However, IL-STEM studies typically analyze only a handful of particles. 30 While this particle-by-particle “bottom-up” approach identifies mechanisms, it does not capture the statistical diversity of real electrocatalyst ensembles. Conversely, conventional random-location imaging covers many particles but lacks local history. Furthermore, both approaches miss interparticle interactions, leaving a gap in the quantitative understanding of degradation at scale. Closing this gap requires scaling up IL-STEM to encompass a greater number of nanoparticles and their interactions, together with a reliable automated data analysis pipeline. This would provide statistically meaningful insights while retaining local history. Algorithms not only accelerate analysis but also minimize human bias and ensure reproducibility. 34 , 35 Among the various proposed methods for automating (S)TEM image analysis using sophisticated algorithms, a significant number focus on object segmentation. 36 While many have tackled the segmentation of nanoparticles 26 , 37 – 42 and other nanostructures, 43–49 overlapping particles remain difficult to resolve, even with advanced machine learning. Addressing this challenge is crucial for reliable large-scale IL-STEM studies of practical electrocatalysts. Here, we demonstrate how IL-STEM can be scaled up to analyze hundreds of Pt–Co/C nanoparticles subjected to different electrochemical protocols. We establish a three-step image analysis workflow comprising segmentation, tracking, and degradation-event classification, progressively automating each step. The pipeline enables robust quantification of degradation mechanisms and reveals which particle types are most susceptible. Experimental observations are complemented with theoretical modeling to contextualize the degradation processes. This study advances IL-STEM from a qualitative, small-sample method to a scalable, quantitative tool, providing statistically grounded, data-driven insights into nanoparticle stability. Results a. Scaling up identical-location STEM for Pt-Co catalytic nanoparticles A commercial Pt–Co/C electrocatalyst was selected to quantify degradation mechanisms. The catalyst consists of Pt–Co nanoparticles supported on Vulcan XC-72 carbon, with an average particle size of 2–3 nm, a total (Pt + Co) metal loading of ~ 20 wt%, and a nominal Pt:Co atomic ratio of 1:1. Previous studies showed that, while the overall ratio is 1:1, the sample also contains some pure Co particles, making the Pt-Co nanoparticles richer in Pt. 6 STEM imaging ( Supplementary Fig. 1 ) shows the morphology of the carbon support and the dispersion of Pt–Co nanoparticles, which are typically only a few nanometers in size. XRD ( Supplementary Fig. 2 ) confirms the Pt-Co Fm-3m disordered alloy phase with small crystallites, as evident from the broad (111), (200), and (220) diffraction maxima, and the carbon support with a broad peak near 25°. Narrow reflections are consistent with pure Co. In a previous study, this catalyst was activated using an MFE setup with 200 cycles between 0.05 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at 300 mV s⁻¹ in an inert atmosphere. 6 IL-STEM imaging at atomic resolution revealed structural variations among individual nanoparticles, but the number of particles that can be studied at this detail is inherently limited, and the impact of the local environment is difficult to assess. To expand the analysis, we revisited lower-magnification IL-STEM image pairs from that dataset (the “activation dataset”). Figure 1 a illustrates the workflow: IL-STEM images were acquired before and after catalyst activation in the modified floating electrode. Nanoparticles were annotated in both sets of images, linked across the before and after states, and grouped into degradation events. Most events involved two particle masks (one per image), cases where a particle appeared in only one image were recorded as single-mask events, while merging of several particles was represented by multiple masks. Here, a mask is a binary image in which pixels corresponding to the particle are marked, providing a clear outline of its shape. Events were categorized into degradation mechanisms using a decision tree (Fig. 1 b). The decision tree incorporates simple geometric descriptors (particle number, diameter, circularity, and local environment) to assign each event to a distinct degradation mechanism or to confirm no significant change (Fig. 1 c). This framework reduces complex degradation phenomena to a set of interpretable rules, enabling mechanism-specific classification across large datasets. In doing so, IL-STEM evolves from a primarily descriptive tool into a robust quantitative method for probing electrocatalyst stability. Most outcomes can be traced to two primary degradation mechanisms: platinum dissolution and carbon corrosion. Under the present conditions, platinum dissolution is known to trigger cobalt dissolution, 6 so the shrinkage observed here (defined as dissolution in Fig. 1 b) refers to overall nanoparticle loss rather than to a single element. The decision tree was designed based on prior studies of Pt-based nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation. 15 , 27 A 5% tolerance was included in the selected criteria to account for segmentation uncertainty, typically at least one pixel around a particle, and to avoid labeling tiny variations as degradation. The activation dataset contained 209 events, which were classified using the decision tree. Figure 2 a shows the size and circularity distributions before and after activation for mechanisms with at least ten events. Most nanoparticles are near-spherical with diameters of 2 to 6 nm. Supplementary Table 1 summarizes mean values and standard deviations for each category. Examining dissolution events, defined as particles getting smaller, shows that they are most prevalent among nearly spherical nanoparticles. Nanoparticles that remain unchanged display a similar circularity range but a slightly smaller average diameter. Figure 2 b displays the frequency of each degradation mechanism. These two groups of events account for about one-half and one-fifth of all events, respectively. Smaller nanoparticles are more prone to complete detachment from the carbon support, and newly attached particles observed only after activation also tend to be smaller. During agglomeration, small and circular nanoparticles combine into larger, less circular agglomerates, whereas deposition events typically yield larger spherical particles. Detachments make up more than 10% of all events, and attachment, agglomeration, and deposition each account for 4–6%. No other mechanisms were identified. These results highlight correlations between particle characteristics and degradation pathways, but the infrequency of some mechanisms limits firm conclusions. For instance, there are only 13 attachment events, so a few occurrences can significantly influence the trends. While the activation dataset of 209 events from six pairs of IL-STEM images provides a useful proof of concept, larger datasets are needed for more robust conclusions. To this end, a second dataset, referred to as the degradation dataset, was collected for the same electrocatalyst. The MFE setup was used for an activation protocol of 200 cycles between 0.05 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at 300 mV/s, followed by a degradation protocol of 5,000 cycles between 0.4 and 1.2 V at 1 V/s. IL-STEM images were recorded before and after the entire protocol. Supplementary Fig. 3 shows the initial and final cyclic voltammograms for both protocol segments on two TEM grids. Activation yielded a platinum-like signal within the chosen potential window under an inert atmosphere. During degradation, only minor changes occurred: the final voltammogram exhibited slightly lower current, consistent with a decrease in active sites. A larger IL-STEM dataset was collected, resulting in 696 events that were analyzed as previously. Figure 3 a includes the size and circularity distributions for all events and individual degradation mechanisms, and Fig. 3 b summarizes their frequencies. Supplementary Table 2 lists average sizes and circularities for each mechanism. The degradation dataset largely followed the same trends as the activation dataset. The activation protocol likely stabilized the catalyst structure, leading to only minor additional changes during subsequent degradation. The particle distribution in the initial state was nearly identical, confirming that we obtained images of representative areas. Several conclusions are consistent across both datasets. Dissolved and unchanged nanoparticles show similar diameter and circularity distributions, while smaller particles are predominantly involved in attachment and detachment processes. Some findings are more pronounced in the degradation dataset due to improved statistics. With more than three times the number of events, less frequent mechanisms could be examined with greater confidence. For example, attachment events exhibit a broader circularity distribution, and detachment occurs preferentially in spherical particles. Dissolution remains the dominant mechanism in both datasets, followed by unchanged particles, but the degradation dataset shows a higher proportion of unchanged particles, detachments, and depositions, and fewer dissolutions and agglomerations. The degradation dataset also revealed a few Ostwald ripening events, absent in the manually annotated activation dataset. Although they might be interpreted as agglomeration followed by reshaping, the scarcity of reshaping events makes this unlikely. The higher frequency of detachments reduces accessible surface area, consistent with the lower currents observed after degradation, as indicated by the diminished Pt features in Supplementary Fig. 3 . A larger dataset certainly improves the statistical analysis. Nevertheless, even the activation dataset, developed from merely six pairs of IL-STEM images, provided meaningful insights into the behavior of Pt-Co nanoparticles under electrochemical stimuli. Interestingly, unchanged nanoparticles were more frequent in the degradation dataset despite the longer electrochemical treatment. Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 show no clear patterns apart from slight shrinkage during activation. Several factors may account for this apparent stability. A comparison of Fig. 2 b and Fig. 3 b suggests dissolution followed by redeposition, restoring particle size. A prior atomic-resolution study of Pt-Co nanoparticles during potential cycling likewise observed both dissolution and new atomic columns, consistent with redeposition. 6 Some particles may also have been shielded from the electrolyte by carbon layers or complete embedding, making them inactive. Because most imaged particles overlap with the carbon support, the extent of this effect is hard to judge. Another factor to consider when comparing the unchanged nanoparticles from the activation and degradation datasets is electrolyte pH, previously reported to influence platinum dissolution under cyclic voltammetry conditions. 50 Finally, some nanoparticles may simply possess inherently higher stability. Large-scale IL-STEM data provide quantitative insight into which nanoparticle types are more likely to maintain their structure during potential cycling. Typically, spherical nanoparticles of average size are most stable, although similar particles may also undergo dissolution. In contrast, small or irregularly shaped nanoparticles rarely remain unchanged, suggesting that limiting their number could improve catalyst design. The current analysis cannot address the effects of local composition or crystal structure, which would require a multi-modal IL-EM. Previous studies support these observations. Time- and potential-resolved dissolution experiments showed that 3 nm Pt nanoparticles dissolve more readily than 30 nm ones. 51 Similarly, Pt particles between 2 and 10 nm dissolve faster at smaller sizes under wide potential cycling windows. 52 These trends are also consistent with particle-size-dependent potential–pH diagrams. 53 While shape effects have been explored mostly in the context of deliberately synthesizing defined morphologies, fewer studies compare stability across particle shapes within a single sample. 54 Applying scaled-up IL-STEM to broader datasets with diverse degradation protocols would allow predictive correlations between particle size, shape, environment, and electrochemical conditions, ultimately guiding the design of both stable catalysts and optimized operating protocols. Complementary electrochemical characterization of the same Pt-Co/C catalyst by rotating disk electrode and EDX analysis supports these findings. 6 As shown in Supplementary Fig. 4 , the ECSA decreased modestly after degradation relative to activation. The Pt:Co ratio shifted notably toward Pt during activation but remained within error during degradation. These results agree with current findings, which indicate that degradation introduces fewer changes than activation. There are potential risks and limitations to this type of analysis. The main trade-off is resolution: while atomic-resolution IL-STEM can provide detailed insights into individual nanoparticles, extending such analysis to hundreds of particles is not yet feasible. Achieving this throughput would require fully automated atomic-resolution STEM imaging, a technical frontier still to be realized. In addition, systematic errors such as grid wrinkling, imperfect annotation, and limited statistics on rare degradation mechanisms may also influence the results. b. Step-by-step automation of large-scale IL-STEM analysis In the long run, the process of preparing the dataset should be automated, especially particle segmentation. This task remains challenging even for advanced algorithms because images often contain overlapping nanoparticles. Although the Pt-Co particles were generally well dispersed on carbon due to the relatively low metal loading, several instances of overlap were observed. In HAADF-STEM images, the overlapping region appears significantly lighter than the rest of the nanoparticle. A classical algorithm could, in principle, correctly assign the overlapping region to both neighboring nanoparticles, but the process becomes more complex when there are multiple overlapping nanoparticles or when one particle is out of focus. Watershed segmentation is sometimes used, but it typically underestimates particle areas by splitting the overlap between neighbors. More advanced approaches are therefore needed. Here, we implemented a neural-network-based particle detection to tackle the challenge of partially overlapping supported nanoparticles. Once trained, the network identified nanoparticles in new images and reported their radii and circularities. Because some annotated images were reserved for training, the total number of analyzed particles was smaller. Two representative test images with successful detection of overlapping nanoparticles are shown in Fig. 4a . The neural network correctly detects instances of nanoparticles, even when there is significant overlap among them. Model performance was evaluated against manual annotations. Although the model predicts circularity with good numerical accuracy, achieving a relative error of just 5.65%, particles with a low circularity remain a challenge, likely due to their rarity in the training set. Particle size predictions had a relative error of 11.93%, but deviations were not biased toward particular sizes. The particle detections were used for analysis as previously. Figure 4c shows mechanism frequencies for the activation and degradation datasets, obtained with automated particle detection and manual particle association. Supplementary Tables 3 and 4 summarize particle sizes and circularities by mechanism, and Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6 contain the scatter plots with histograms. Compared to the ground truth values in Fig. 2 b for the activation dataset and Fig. 3 b for the degradation one, dissolution is again recognized as the most frequent degradation mechanism, followed by unchanged nanoparticles. In the second case, they are correctly followed by detachment and deposition events. However, there are discrepancies when it comes to less frequently occurring mechanisms, especially in the smaller activation dataset. Automated detections also produced higher standard deviations for particle sizes, although mean values remained close to manual ones. Trends such as smaller diameters for attached and detached particles were still reproduced. By contrast, circularity-based distinctions were less clear, partly due to difficulties in recognizing agglomerated particles, which likely contributed to missed agglomeration events and the higher fraction of depositions. Similarly, this workflow does not capture the full morphological diversity of attached particles. In the degradation dataset, these issues were less pronounced, indicating more robust performance. Nonetheless, the neural-network-based particle detection combined with manual particle association still returns reliable insights into the dominant degradation mechanisms for Pt-Co nanoparticles undergoing potential cycling. Crucially, the network handled overlapping nanoparticles well, a prerequisite for scaling up IL-STEM analysis. In addition to segmentation, connecting masks between IL-STEM images can also be automated. Here, we implemented a heuristic algorithm to form events based on potential degradation mechanisms. The process involved several steps: aligning the two images, matching particles with overlapping masks, identifying particles missing in one image or merged into larger features, and resolving any remaining candidates. This workflow was developed on the activation dataset without further tuning before applying it to the degradation dataset. Results for a representative image pair are shown in Fig. 4b . Figure 4d summarizes the outcomes of automated particle association applied to manually segmented particles. The dominant mechanisms of dissolution, unchanged particles, and detachment were correctly identified in both datasets. Discrepancies arose mainly in less frequent categories, such as attachment and deposition during activation, and some activation events were misclassified as Ostwald ripening. In the degradation dataset, the mechanism order was consistent, although attachment increased and agglomeration decreased. These findings confirm that the algorithm was not overfit to the activation dataset and can be used for other images. Supplementary Tables 5 and 6 compare particle sizes and circularities obtained with automated association of manually annotated particles (scatter plots with histograms in Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8 ). While the results generally agree, 10% fewer events were analyzed due to missed matches, especially in crowded regions with overlapping nanoparticles. Some overlooked and mismatched particles lead to deviations in determined particle sizes and circularities, especially with less common mechanisms, where a few outliers can significantly affect results. For instance, in the degradation dataset, agglomerated nanoparticles and particles post-complete Ostwald ripening are not larger than the initial particles. Additionally, particles exhibit a narrowed circularity range after attachment, with non-circular particles often being excluded from analysis. Despite these limitations, the approach provides useful insights into the prevalence of different degradation mechanisms, particularly in images of well-dispersed nanoparticles. Like the decision tree, the heuristic process can be tailored to expected physical processes between two IL-STEM images. Once implemented, it can be applied repeatedly, saving analysis time. Finally, we consider the fully automated pipeline, which integrates both particle detection and association across IL-STEM image pairs. Results are shown in Fig. 4e, Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10 , and summarized in Supplementary Tables 7 and 8 . Despite accumulated uncertainty, the core findings are preserved. Dissolution remains the most frequent degradation mechanism, followed by unchanged particles, while detached particles are consistently smaller. For attached particles, the trend of reduced size is also present in most cases, though it becomes less clear when both detection and linking are fully automated, reflecting increased size variance. Dataset size influences reliability. In the smaller activation dataset, detection errors disproportionately affect the classification of rare mechanisms. By contrast, the degradation dataset shows fewer discrepancies, and random errors tend to be statistically diluted. This highlights a central consideration: automation is more reliable and meaningful when applied to large datasets. As data volume increases, statistical robustness improves, making manual processing impractical at scale. While automated methods effectively reveal dominant trends despite minor errors, manual annotation is still best for analyzing rare or subtle phenomena, even if it means fewer particles are examined. The most notable is the confusion between agglomeration and deposition, especially in the activation dataset, where agglomeration is underrepresented and deposition overestimated. This distinction is not trivial, as it can directly affect the scientific understanding of material behavior. That said, these two mechanisms are not among the most frequent, which somewhat limits the broader impact of this issue. Each layer of automation reduces accuracy but offers substantial efficiency gains. The trained detection model and association algorithm can now be deployed rapidly across large datasets that would be impractical to process manually. The fully automated pipeline reliably captures dominant mechanisms and size trends. We recommend full automation primarily for large-scale studies, and only once the robustness of the procedure has been adequately validated. c. Theoretical modeling of Pt-Co particle evolution during activation The experimental findings were further contextualized with theoretical models. Eleven nanoparticles from one IL-STEM image set in the activation dataset were selected, and two primary degradation mechanisms (metal dissolution and carbon corrosion) were modeled to describe common pathways such as dissolution, detachment, and agglomeration. Detailed mathematical formulations are provided in the Supporting Information. Figure 5 summarizes how particle size and embedment in the carbon support evolve during the activation protocol. Geometric parameters before and after simulation are listed in Supplementary Table 10 , while Fig. 5 a shows the selected Pt-Co nanoparticles and their color assignments used in the plots. The simulations (Fig. 5 b) indicate that dissolution proceeds more rapidly for smaller particles, accelerating as size decreases. This is coupled with enhanced carbon corrosion, reflected in large changes in particle–support contact area (Fig. 5 c-d). Size reduction can directly cause dissolution or promote detachment, either through complete loss of the particle or through weakened adhesion from interfacial corrosion. Overall, corrosion appears substantial, with interfacial area changes comparable to initial values under the simplifying assumption of a π/2 contact angle. It should be noted that this is the result for a simplified model that does not consider all aspects of the inherently complex catalyst structure. Assuming a uniform contact angle may be questionable, and a lower initial value for detached particles could lead to the same pattern of agglomeration at a much slower carbon corrosion rate. In any case, once a particle shrinks below a critical size, it is more likely to be lost through dissolution or detachment. Both dissolution and corrosion thus play central roles in detachment. The process of agglomeration, as explained using adhesion and attractive forces in Fig. 5 e, provides additional insight. As particles shrink or corrode, adhesion to carbon decreases. At the same time, attractive forces between nearby particles, which depend on their size and distance, can become more significant. For some particles (e.g., 9 and 10 in Fig. 5 a), attraction eventually surpasses adhesion, leading to detachment and reattachment to a neighbor. These models provide mechanistic insight inaccessible to IL-STEM alone. Although simplified relative to experimental reality, they help explain how nanoscale processes such as corrosion-driven detachment and agglomeration govern the long-term structural evolution of catalyst layers. Conclusions We developed a method to quantify the contributions of different degradation mechanisms in a commercial Pt-Co/C oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst subjected to activation and degradation protocols. By scaling up identical-location STEM to hundreds of nanoparticles, we move beyond the small sample sizes of previous studies and achieve statistically meaningful insights. Dissolution was the dominant process, followed by unchanged particles and detachments, while agglomeration, attachment, and deposition were far less frequent. The analysis also revealed clear size- and shape-dependent trends, with smaller and irregular particles being more susceptible to degradation. To enable large-scale IL-STEM, we established a three-step image analysis workflow comprising segmentation, tracking, and degradation-event classification. Automation, including the use of machine learning, reduced manual effort while preserving accuracy, though manual inspection remains useful for small datasets or rare events. The microscopy results were consistent with electrochemical measurements, while theoretical models provided further mechanistic context. This work demonstrates that scaled-up IL-STEM, combined with automated analysis, enables quantitative and unbiased mapping of nanoparticle degradation pathways. Such statistically grounded insights cannot be obtained from random-location imaging or small-scale IL-STEM. In the long term, extending automation to the imaging process itself could realize fully autonomous, closed-loop microscopy, accelerating the discovery of durable fuel cell electrocatalysts. Methods a. Material A Pt-Co/C reference electrocatalyst was purchased from FuelCellStore. 55 The catalyst was described as Pt-Co alloy nanoparticles with an average size of 2-3 nanometers on Vulcan XC-72 carbon support. The total metal loading was stated as 20 wt.% with a 1:1 molar ratio of Pt to Co. b. Powder X-ray diffraction XRD patterns were collected using a PANalytical X’Pert PRO MPD diffractometer with Cu Kα 1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) in the 2θ range from 10° to 80° with a step size of 0.034° and a holding time of 850 s. Four scans were collected under the same instrumental conditions and summed up. Samples were prepared on a Fe holder. c. Scanning transmission electron microscopy STEM imaging was performed in a probe Cs-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope Jeol ARM 200 CF. The accelerating voltage was 80 kV, and the convergence semi-angle was set to ~18 mrad. The collection semi-angles for the bright-field (BF) and high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) images were 0-45 and 68-185 mrad, respectively. A 1 mg/mL suspension of the Pt-Co/C electrocatalyst was prepared with Milli-Q water (18.2 Ω cm). 1.5 µL of the suspension was dropcasted on a gold holey-carbon-coated TEM grid (Agar Scientific) and dried at room temperature (RT). Identical-location imaging involved collecting STEM data from the same locations both before and after sample treatment. Several spots were identified and imaged at various magnifications to assist in tracking them. All images were captured under identical instrumental conditions. d. Sample treatment Sample treatment, aimed at introducing structural changes to the Pt-Co/C electrocatalyst, was carried out using a modified floating electrode (MFE) setup. The setup featured a two-piece Teflon housing, with a metallic spring positioned between two metallic cones. A gas diffusion layer (thickness 280 μm) with 40% Teflon weight wet proofing (Toray Carbon Paper 090, FuelCellStore), was used as a separator between the metallic cones and the TEM grid. The TEM grid assumed the role of the working electrode. MFE experiments were done in a three-electrode setup with 0.1 M HClO 4 (70 % Rotipuran Supra, Carl Roth, diluted by Milli-Q, 18.2 MΩ cm) as the electrolyte. A reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE, HydroFlex, Gaskatel) was used as a reference electrode, and a Pt mesh was used as a counter electrode. A gas tube was inserted in the holes in the Teflon housing to purge the system with the chosen gas. The electrochemical protocol was carried out with a BioLogic SP-200 potentiostat. First, the system was purged with argon. The catalyst was activated with 200 cyclic voltammograms between 0.05 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at a scan rate of 300 mV/s, followed by degradation with 5000 cycles between 0.4 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at 1 V/s. Finally, the grid was washed with Milli-Q water and dried at RT. The same protocol was also carried out with a PalmSens EmStat4X potentiostat and a Pt wire as a counter electrode on an identically prepared sample to investigate the reproducibility of the measurements and mitigate external effects on the signal. e. Image analysis For a detailed analysis, images of specific magnifications were selected based on the relation between the pixel size and the average nanoparticle size. In the activation dataset, pixel sizes from 0.022 to 0.061 nm were considered. In the degradation dataset, all analyzed images were collected with a pixel size of 0.036 nm. Nanoparticles in IL-STEM images were annotated manually to produce particle masks using the Supervisely platform. 56 Each mask was defined by two geometric parameters: equivalent sphere diameter and circularity, both calculated from the measured areas and perimeters. The equivalent sphere diameter was determined as: Circularity was defined as: Particle masks in IL-STEM images were connected to form events, allowing us to track each annotated nanoparticle. Only particles that did not touch the edges of the images were considered. To automate particle association, a heuristic algorithm was developed to align two sets of masks and then connect them based on their proximity and similarity. These events were then classified into distinct degradation mechanisms using a decision tree. Equivalent sphere diameters of particle masks were converted to real-space quantities using image calibrations. The code for analyzing particle masks was written in Python using open-source libraries. To automate particle detection in raw images, a neural network was considered, which received BF- and HAADF-STEM images and returned regressed values of particle radii and circularities. A Center-direction Regression Network (CeDiRNet) for point-based object detection was utilized. 57 The network was further extended for regressing particle radius and circularity as a dense map prediction following a similar extension for orientations in CeDiRNet-3DoF. 58 A more detailed description can be found in the Supplementary Note 1 . Pairs of manually annotated BF- and HAADF-STEM images of the same regions of interest were used as channels to construct two-channel images. These images served for training and testing the neural network. We utilized 12 pairs of images depicting carbon-supported platinum-nickel nanoparticles, which were taken of a material used in a previous study. 59 We also included several pairs of images of the commercial Pt-Co/C electrocatalyst. However, these were excluded from the final analysis to avoid using the same nanoparticles for both training and analysis. In total, 23 pairs of images were used. Whenever the resulting detections were used for subsequent analysis, particle binary masks were constructed with a size matching the original size of STEM images, and results were calibrated in real space. f. Modelling A mathematical model of catalyst particle degradation was used to explain the processes involved in the changes observed during activation. The model is based on previously developed models, describing the changes in the size distribution of catalyst particles, 60–62 modified to explain the evolution of individual particles. Activation was described using the same parameters as were used experimentally. The model describes two primary degradation mechanisms: particle growth or shrinkage due to dissolution and redeposition, and particle detachment, migration, and agglomeration due to corrosion of the carbon support. Electrochemical dissolution and redeposition of the catalyst from the particles were modelled using the Butler-Volmer equation, with the effect of particle size incorporated as a Kelvin term in the equilibrium potential. 63 The reaction rate is primarily determined by the electrical potential applied to the catalyst. Diffusion of dissolved catalyst ions between particles was modelled using a finite volume method, with regions of space for each particle defined by a Voronoi diagram. 64 Corrosion of carbon support results from electrochemical reactions between surface oxides on the catalyst and carbon support, which were also modelled using Butler-Volmer equations. The corrosion rate is used to determine the change in contact surface and, consequently, the adhesion force between catalyst particles and carbon support, which counteracts the attractive forces between particles. Once the contact surface is sufficiently reduced, the particle is free to move in the direction of the net force and potentially agglomerate with another particle. Degradation processes were described as a set of differential equations, describing the size and 3 spatial coordinates of each particle, as well as oxidation of its surface (surface coverage of hydroxide and oxide groups), oxidation of carbon surface in its vicinity (surface coverage of hydroxide and oxide groups), concentration of dissolved catalyst ion in its vicinity, and contact surface between particle and carbon support, resulting in total of 10 differential equations for each modelled particle. Equations were solved in the Python programming language using the routine solve_ivp from the Scipy package. 65 Details of the modelling procedure can be found in the Supplementary Note 2 . Declarations Ethics declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Author contributions A.R.K., G.D., and N.H. designed and supervised the project. A.R.K. conceived the idea, analyzed the data, automated particle association, and wrote the initial paper. J.V. annotated the data and contributed to data analysis. D.T. automated particle detection using a neural network under the supervision of D.S. A.L. carried out electrochemical treatments using MFE. F.R.-Z. performed IL-STEM. A.K. performed numerical simulations. All authors discussed the results and contributed to editing the paper. Acknowledgments Blaž Lipar is acknowledged for his help with data annotation, and Edi Kranjc is acknowledged for XRD measurements. The authors would like to acknowledge the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) through programs P2-0393, I0–0003, and P2-0401; the projects J2-3041, N2-0257, and J7-4637; the grant Artificial Intelligence for Science (GC-0001); and European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant 123STABLE (grant agreement ID: 852208). A.R.K. acknowledges the Janko Jamnik scholarship. Data availability Raw experimental data (XRD pattern, MFE measurements, ex-situ and identical-location STEM images) are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17158369 . Code availability The code to analyze IL-STEM data is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17158369 . References Baum ZJ, Diaz LL, Konovalova T, Zhou QA (2022) Materials Research Directions Toward a Green Hydrogen Economy: A Review. ACS Omega 7:32908–32935 Jiao K et al (2021) Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature 595:361–369 Banham D, Ye S (2017) Current status and future development of catalyst materials and catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: An industrial perspective. ACS Energy Lett 2:629–638 Janssen M, Weber P, Oezaslan M (2023) Recent advances of various Pt-based catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Curr Opin Electrochem 40:101337 Prokop M, Drakselova M, Bouzek K (2020) Review of the experimental study and prediction of Pt-based catalyst degradation during PEM fuel cell operation. Curr Opin Electrochem 20:20–27 Moriau LJ et al (2021) Resolving the nanoparticles’ structure-property relationships at the atomic level: a study of Pt-based electrocatalysts. iScience 24, 102102 Kim HY, Kim JY, Joo SH (2021) Pt-based Intermetallic Nanocatalysts for Promoting the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Bull Korean Chem Soc 42:724–736 Bandarenka AS, Koper MTM (2013) Structural and electronic effects in heterogeneous electrocatalysis: Toward a rational design of electrocatalysts. J Catal 308:11–24 Luo M, Guo S (2017) Strain-controlled electrocatalysis on multimetallic nanomaterials. Nat Rev Mater 2:1–14 Garlyyev B et al (2019) Revealing the nature of active sites in electrocatalysis. Chem Sci 10:8060–8075 Kim S et al (2021) Correlating 3D Surface Atomic Structure and Catalytic Activities of Pt Nanocrystals. Nano Lett 21:1175–1183 Kodama K, Nagai T, Kuwaki A, Jinnouchi R, Morimoto Y (2021) Challenges in applying highly active Pt-based nanostructured catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions to fuel cell vehicles. Nat Nanotechnol 16:140–147 Zaman S et al (2021) Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts toward Practical Fuel Cells: Progress and Perspectives. Angewandte Chemie - Int Ed 60:17832–17852 Ehelebe K, Escalera-López D, Cherevko S (2021) Limitations of aqueous model systems in the stability assessment of electrocatalysts for oxygen reactions in fuel cell and electrolyzers. Curr Opin Electrochem 29:100832 Meier JC et al (2014) Design criteria for stable Pt/C fuel cell catalysts. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:44–67 Hodnik N, Dehm G, Mayrhofer KJJ (2016) Importance and Challenges of Electrochemical in Situ Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy for Energy Conversion Research. Acc Chem Res 49:2015–2022 Martín AJ, Mitchell S, Mondelli C, Jaydev S (2022) Pérez-Ramírez, J. Unifying views on catalyst deactivation. Nat Catal 5:854–866 Wang M et al (2025) Oxygen reduction electrocatalyst degradation and mitigation strategies in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl Catal B 367 Gunnarson A et al (2023) Stability Investigations on a Pt@HGS Catalyst as a Model Material for Fuel Cell Applications: The Role of the Local pH. Angewandte Chemie - Int Ed 62 Aarons J et al (2017) Predicting the Oxygen-Binding Properties of Platinum Nanoparticle Ensembles by Combining High-Precision Electron Microscopy and Density Functional Theory. Nano Lett 17:4003–4012 Kalinin SV et al (2019) Lab on a beam-Big data and artificial intelligence in scanning transmission electron microscopy. MRS Bull 44:565–575 van den Bos KHW, Altantzis T, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Bals S (2018) Recent breakthroughs in scanning transmission electron microscopy of small species. Adv Phys X 3:815–833 Schneider P et al (2023) Impact of Platinum Loading and Layer Thickness on Cathode Catalyst Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells. J Electrochem Soc 170:024506 Janssen M et al (2024) Monitoring the Morphological Changes of Skeleton-PtCo Electrocatalyst during PEMFC Start-Up/Shut-Downprobed by in situ WAXS and SAXS. ChemSusChem 17 Guillet F, Chatenet M, Paul A, Svecova L, Dubau L (2024) Electrochemical recovery of Pt/C electrocatalyst: optimization of the potential range on the leaching process and application to an aged MEA. Industrial Chem Mater 2:118–131 Kim S et al (2025) Unraveling Serial Degradation Pathways of Supported Catalysts through Reliable Electrochemical Liquid-Cell TEM Analysis. J Am Chem Soc 147:181–191 Meier JC et al (2012) Degradation mechanisms of Pt/C fuel cell catalysts under simulated start-stop conditions. ACS Catal 2:832–843 Vega-Paredes M et al (2023) Electrochemical Stability of Rhodium-Platinum Core-Shell Nanoparticles: An Identical Location Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Study. ACS Nano 17:16943–16951 Vion-Dury B, Chatenet M, Guétaz L, Maillard F (2011) Determination of Aging Markers and their Use as a Tool to Characterize Pt/C Nanoparticles Degradation Mechanism in Model PEMFC Cathode Environment. ECS Trans 41:697–708 Hodnik N, Cherevko S (2019) Spot the difference at the nanoscale: identical location electron microscopy in electrocatalysis. Curr Opin Electrochem 15:73–82 Shokhen V, Strandberg L, Skoglundh M, Wickman B (2023) Fuel cell electrode degradation followed by identical location transmission electron microscopy. J Mater Chem Mater 11:21029–21035 Strandberg L, Shokhen V, Skoglundh M, Wickman B (2024) Carbon Support Corrosion in PEMFCs Followed by Identical Location Electron Microscopy. ACS Catal 14:8494–8504 Hrnjic A et al (2021) Observing, tracking and analysing electrochemically induced atomic-scale structural changes of an individual Pt-Co nanoparticle as a fuel cell electrocatalyst by combining modified floating electrode and identical location electron microscopy. Electrochim Acta 388:1–16 Spurgeon SR et al (2021) Towards data-driven next-generation transmission electron microscopy. Nat Mater 20:274–279 Rickman JM, Lookman T, Kalinin SV (2019) Materials informatics: From the atomic-level to the continuum. Acta Mater 168:473–510 Batool M, Pedram S, Jankovic J (2025) Quantification of Structural Parameters for Multicomponent Catalyst Systems. ACS Appl Energy Mater 8:8619–8635Advancing Microstructural Analysis: Practical and High-Throughput AI-Based Image Processing and Automated Data Analysis Techniques for MacArthur KE et al (2023) Post-Synthesis Heat Treatment of Doped PtNi-Alloy Fuel-Cell Catalyst Nanoparticles Studied by In-Situ Electron Microscopy. ACS Appl Energy Mater 6:5959–5967 Bell CG et al (2022) Trainable segmentation for transmission electron microscope images of inorganic nanoparticles. J Microsc 288:169–184 Yang SH et al (2023) Deep learning morphological distribution analysis of metal alloy catalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Mater Today Energy 36 Saaim KM, Afridi SK, Nisar M, Islam S (2022) In search of best automated model: Explaining nanoparticle TEM image segmentation. Ultramicroscopy 233 Colliard-Granero A et al (2022) Deep learning for the automation of particle analysis in catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Nanoscale 14:10–18 Noval JJS, Gómez-Merchán R, Leñero-Bardallo JA, Gontard LC (2023) TEMAS: A Flexible Non-AI Algorithm for Metrology of Single-Core and Core-Shell Nanoparticles from TEM Images. Part Part Syst Charact 40 Colliard-Granero A, Jitsev J, Eikerling MH, Malek K, Eslamibidgoli MJ (2023) UTILE-Gen: Automated Image Analysis in Nanoscience Using Synthetic Dataset Generator and Deep Learning. ACS Nanosci Au 3:398–407 Yildirim B, Cole JM (2021) Bayesian Particle Instance Segmentation for Electron Microscopy Image Quantification. J Chem Inf Model 61:1136–1149 Lee B et al (2020) Statistical Characterization of the Morphologies of Nanoparticles through Machine Learning Based Electron Microscopy Image Analysis. ACS Nano 14:17125–17133 Cho MG et al (2024) Size-Resolved Shape Evolution in Inorganic Nanocrystals Captured via High-Throughput Deep Learning-Driven Statistical Characterization. ACS Nano 18:29736–29747 Treder KP et al (2023) nNPipe: a neural network pipeline for automated analysis of morphologically diverse catalyst systems. NPJ Comput Mater 9 Gumbiowski N, Loza K, Heggen M, Epple M (2023) Automated analysis of transmission electron micrographs of metallic nanoparticles by machine learning. Nanoscale Adv 5:2318–2326 Wang X et al (2021) AutoDetect-mNP: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithm for Automated Analysis of Transmission Electron Microscope Images of Metal Nanoparticles. JACS Au 1:316–327 Briega-Martos V, Stojanovski K, Zlatar M, Göllner C, Cherevko S (2024) pH dependence of noble metals dissolution: Platinum. Electrochim Acta 501:144793 Jovanovič P et al (2014) New insight into platinum dissolution from nanoparticulate platinum-based electrocatalysts using highly sensitive in situ concentration measurements. ChemCatChem 6:449–453 Sandbeck DJS et al (2020) Particle Size Effect on Platinum Dissolution: Considerations for Accelerated Stability Testing of Fuel Cell Catalysts. ACS Catal 10:6281–6290 Cherevko S, Kulyk N, Mayrhofer KJJ (2016) Durability of platinum-based fuel cell electrocatalysts: Dissolution of bulk and nanoscale platinum. Nano Energy 29:275–298 Đukić T et al (2022) Stability challenges of carbon-supported Pt-nanoalloys as fuel cell oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts. Chem Commun 58:13832–13854 20% Wt Platinum Cobalt (1:1 Atomic ratio) on Vulcan. https://www.fuelcellstore.com/20-platinum-cobalt-vulcan Supervisely (2023) Supervisely Computer Vision platform. https://supervisely.com Tabernik D, Muhovič J, Skočaj D (2024) Dense center-direction regression for object counting and localization with point supervision. Pattern Recognit 153 Tabernik D, Muhovič J, Urbas M, Skočaj D (2024) Center Direction Network for Grasping Point Localization on Cloths. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 9:8913–8920 Gatalo M et al (2022) Importance of Chemical Activation and the Effect of Low Operation Voltage on the Performance of Pt-Alloy Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts. ACS Appl Energy Mater 5:8862–8877 Kregar A, Kravos A, Katrašnik T (2020) Methodology for Evaluation of Contributions of Ostwald Ripening and Particle Agglomeration to Growth of Catalyst Particles in PEM Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 20:487–498 Kregar A, Tavčar G, Kravos A, Katrašnik T (2020) Predictive system-level modeling framework for transient operation and cathode platinum degradation of high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl Energy 263:114547 Kregar A, Gatalo M, Maselj N, Hodnik N, Katrašnik T (2021) Temperature dependent model of carbon supported platinum fuel cell catalyst degradation. J Power Sources 514 Plieth WJ (1982) Electrochemical Properties of Small Clusters of Metal Atoms and Their Role in Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. J Phys Chem 86:3166–3170 Voronoi G (1908) Nouvelles applications des parametres continus a la theorie des formes quadratiques. Sur quelques proprietes des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. J für die reine und angewandte Math 133:97–102 Virtanen P et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261–272 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files KamsekquantifyingdegradationSI.docx Supporting information for Machine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation (DOCX) Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7656978","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":517565965,"identity":"1f167178-55f3-4a51-a345-6d4e8844e527","order_by":0,"name":"Ana Rebeka Kamšek","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6247-3256","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ana","middleName":"Rebeka","lastName":"Kamšek","suffix":""},{"id":517565966,"identity":"7b3228bc-104c-41bc-be25-e890f2f103cd","order_by":1,"name":"Francisco Ruiz-Zepeda","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-3433","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Francisco","middleName":"","lastName":"Ruiz-Zepeda","suffix":""},{"id":517565967,"identity":"a7aa1158-398a-4a62-845f-bea9f5bc070c","order_by":2,"name":"Domen Tabernik","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5613-5882","institution":"University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer and Information Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Domen","middleName":"","lastName":"Tabernik","suffix":""},{"id":517565968,"identity":"d8867b78-031d-4d1e-8933-78941a6be51d","order_by":3,"name":"Jan Vidergar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jan","middleName":"","lastName":"Vidergar","suffix":""},{"id":517565969,"identity":"d9dd0cab-2151-4509-a684-884265fc12b4","order_by":4,"name":"Anja Logar","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0002-5489","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anja","middleName":"","lastName":"Logar","suffix":""},{"id":517565970,"identity":"7c8c9ea6-4635-4427-9dba-a65c5b851a4b","order_by":5,"name":"Ambrož Kregar","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1249-7408","institution":"University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ambrož","middleName":"","lastName":"Kregar","suffix":""},{"id":517565971,"identity":"445eba11-be0b-45b5-bd4d-19ac6e462973","order_by":6,"name":"Danijel Skočaj","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-4736","institution":"University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer and Information Science","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Danijel","middleName":"","lastName":"Skočaj","suffix":""},{"id":517565972,"identity":"fd9bc8bf-3936-46ca-b0ab-8b62fbd1d2bd","order_by":7,"name":"Goran Dražić","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-8050","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Goran","middleName":"","lastName":"Dražić","suffix":""},{"id":517565973,"identity":"805eb7f9-6f43-4553-aae2-e12e7b7cf790","order_by":8,"name":"Nejc Hodnik","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7113-9769","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nejc","middleName":"","lastName":"Hodnik","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-19 09:37:47","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7656978/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7656978/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":91963643,"identity":"4de9f8cf-8291-4431-ac70-e61deb3f25f1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3109562,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Kamsekquantifyingdegradation.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/9a456ffecf9b63e1ee0f2441.docx"},{"id":91963642,"identity":"920ba91d-6c32-4df8-9db0-e7ad45c18ffa","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":342,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs7656978.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/11680a3e65c9e11a8008b458.json"},{"id":91963640,"identity":"5f57a38c-6b81-408c-9a4d-1ef42b8624f6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:15","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":137781,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs76569780enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/7e8feb4e20dd573410f68c25.xml"},{"id":91963639,"identity":"0dd11ea6-aefb-4e4e-86ab-8e3472dacf3d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:15","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":657840,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/991252b5d3d53ea445e27094.png"},{"id":91963020,"identity":"a4f0c886-092d-44ed-b53a-2e0a21728f78","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":319708,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/d4e1843ef51216deab295812.png"},{"id":91963648,"identity":"7a4368a2-e15b-4aba-9a31-d07a8e1a01eb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":382176,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/02ac7a65d199c41eb295d9e0.png"},{"id":91963022,"identity":"bfbc72ae-15a8-4f1e-ae9b-23266b84df2d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":809353,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/7be8e1811bc770728bbabc7d.png"},{"id":91963016,"identity":"b6bad053-30e1-401b-88dc-fb96237e61ee","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":550971,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/3fa123546bf1e005ea86fa8d.png"},{"id":91963649,"identity":"39de4c7d-4ce2-4ff7-99b1-bc89d2deee94","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":95143,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/06105a8ef0dea981f6138653.png"},{"id":91963641,"identity":"00b4fdea-2d89-4e36-9fb2-7ab4132e74cd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":67550,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/129c235fda3304aa59a281b6.png"},{"id":91963027,"identity":"55f885db-3ae5-467f-8ad5-8c1fcfb533e0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":78452,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/510e3c81d766099f5fb2d9f0.png"},{"id":91963030,"identity":"82e81935-fe4f-4ea8-81a4-804e489cc378","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:16","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":118591,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/ed628c80fa91eb0894bc1a7d.png"},{"id":91963651,"identity":"8a4e5225-5e24-4232-8fbe-3df7c61398b4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":95276,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/fecd74ee7b869790a5522a7a.png"},{"id":91963028,"identity":"483aca57-64bb-45cb-9756-56bf0d7d65c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"xml","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":134361,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs76569780structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/8b14c86ee78e36ce99d97f85.xml"},{"id":91963646,"identity":"8baa8e10-6045-4f0f-bc05-03249d260a9d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"html","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":149240,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/e0b7fe8b3dd8ac5c53d70948.html"},{"id":91963011,"identity":"ecbab494-1d16-4eb8-b3e6-f2f57badcf01","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1056568,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWorkflow for identical-location STEM analysis and classification of nanoparticle degradation\u003c/strong\u003e. \u003cstrong\u003ea,\u003c/strong\u003e Modified floating electrode setup coupled with IL-STEM imaging, yielding paired HAADF-STEM images of Pt-Co/C before and after activation (200 cycles, 0.05–1.2 V\u003csub\u003eRHE\u003c/sub\u003e, 300 mV/s, 4 M HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e). Imaged nanoparticles were converted into particle masks and linked across image pairs to track individual particles. Colored markers denote examples of events with colors corresponding to the ones in \u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e. Decision tree used to classify particle-level events into degradation mechanisms. Color coding was later used for consistent plotting. \u003cstrong\u003ec,\u003c/strong\u003e Schematic depictions of individual degradation mechanisms.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/fb0d498c70d260111b729790.png"},{"id":91963015,"identity":"3417ecab-8223-4d8a-8ad6-095999ba5f9d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":378423,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDegradation events for Pt-Co nanoparticles during potential cycling activation.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ea,\u003c/strong\u003e Scatter plots with histograms showing circularities and equivalent sphere diameters before (red) and after (blue) activation for all events and individual degradation mechanisms (200 cycles, 0.05–1.2 V\u003csub\u003eRHE\u003c/sub\u003e, 300 mV/s, 4 M HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e). \u003cstrong\u003eb,\u003c/strong\u003e Percentages of all mechanisms (n = 209; turquoise – dissolution, orange – no significant changes, blue – detachment, pink – attachment, green – agglomeration, yellow – deposition).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/12c04ea912ca95e5faa9da61.png"},{"id":91964988,"identity":"bbc35d4e-4c48-4b48-ad11-dc91d71098c5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:16:34","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":458350,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDegradation events for Pt-Co nanoparticles during potential cycling activation, followed by degradation.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ea,\u003c/strong\u003e Scatter plots with histograms showing circularities and equivalent sphere diameters before (red) and after (blue) activation (200 cycles, 0.05–1.2 V\u003csub\u003eRHE\u003c/sub\u003e, 300 mV/s, 0.1 M HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e) and degradation (5000 cycles, 0.4–1.2 V\u003csub\u003eRHE\u003c/sub\u003e, 1 V/s, 0.1 M HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e) for all events and individual degradation mechanisms. \u003cstrong\u003eb,\u003c/strong\u003e Percentages of all mechanisms (n = 696; turquoise – dissolution, orange – no significant changes, blue – detachment, yellow – deposition, pink – attachment, green – agglomeration, brown and gray – Ostwald ripening).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/3690c88ee485a5d2b31a898d.png"},{"id":91963644,"identity":"b38e6cc7-8ef4-4a3d-8d68-0dcd16a42b9d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:08:16","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":916832,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStep-by-step automation of large-scale IL-STEM data analysis.\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003ea,\u003c/strong\u003e Examples of two test images with the detected Pt-Co nanoparticles shown in green and the ground truth in blue circles. \u003cstrong\u003eb,\u003c/strong\u003e Connecting particles in IL-STEM with a heuristic algorithm for one set of IL-STEM images with manually segmented particles, before (left) and after (right) potential cycling activation. The panels include event numbers and green and red markers for correctly and incorrectly connected nanoparticles. \u003cstrong\u003ec-e,\u003c/strong\u003eEvent analysis results in terms of percentages of all mechanisms after automated dataset preparation. Turquoise – dissolution, orange – no significant changes, blue – detachment, yellow – deposition, pink – attachment, green – agglomeration, brown and gray – Ostwald ripening).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/72b867207109caf07132a632.png"},{"id":91963024,"identity":"2a27ad0b-d72c-492a-bb88-409bfca4ecb9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:00:15","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":640070,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTheoretical modeling of particle evolution during potential cycling activation. a,\u003c/strong\u003e A depiction of particles that were used for modelling with numerical indices and the color legend. \u003cstrong\u003eb,\u003c/strong\u003e Tracking particle diameters. Lines denote the modelling result, and circular markers with error bars denote experimental values from STEM images. \u003cstrong\u003ec,\u003c/strong\u003e Tracking the contact surface between PtCo nanoparticles and the carbon support. Values are normalized to the initial contact surfaces for each nanoparticle. \u003cstrong\u003ed,\u003c/strong\u003eChanges in the normalized contact surface, plotted against the initial nanoparticle diameter. \u003cstrong\u003ee,\u003c/strong\u003e Tracking the adhesion (full lines) and attractive Casimir forces (dashed lines).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/16ff196582833af71b7e0499.png"},{"id":91965112,"identity":"3f33f59f-cda2-4dd6-b1c2-b4aa19469000","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:20:11","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3958466,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/8379c511-d6ce-4fef-ab18-efccf19c2fd8.pdf"},{"id":91964981,"identity":"f65b49a6-3604-4fea-bdc1-0f5731646095","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-23 08:16:20","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":7893309,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupporting information for Machine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation (DOCX)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"KamsekquantifyingdegradationSI.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7656978/v1/a9282f8ac046254f75d3a9bc.docx"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eMachine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Main","content":"\u003cp\u003eHydrogen technologies present a promising alternative to fossil fuels, with the potential to decarbonize both transport and stationary power generation. In the clean hydrogen cycle, hydrogen is produced via water electrolysis and then converted to electricity in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), where hydrogen reacts with oxygen to form water.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e The inherently sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) requires a catalyst, and PEMFC operation also depends on external conditions such as humidity and temperature.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHigh cost remains a major barrier to PEMFC commercialization, largely due to the reliance on platinum, as Pt-based nanoparticles on carbon supports are widely used as ORR electrocatalysts. Optimal catalyst layers must balance platinum utilization, conductivity, and mass transport, while delivering high activity and durability.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A similar constraint applies to low-temperature electrolyzers, which also employ Pt. Alloying Pt with a cheaper transition metal (M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Cu, Co, Ni, or Fe) reduces platinum content and can even enhance activity by tuning the electronic structure.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR5\" citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e In practice, real catalyst batches contain nanoparticles with heterogeneous size, shape, and composition,\u003csup\u003e7\u0026ndash;11\u003c/sup\u003e making them more complex than model systems used for theoretical predictions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR13\" citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDespite progress in activity and cost reduction, durability remains the key challenge for Pt\u0026ndash;M electrocatalysts.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Stable catalysts must retain their structure and composition under operating conditions, yet several degradation mechanisms (dissolution, detachment, agglomeration, Ostwald ripening, and support corrosion) commonly affect Pt\u0026ndash;M/C systems.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e These processes are often interlinked. Carbon corrosion can lead to particle detachment or agglomeration, lowering the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), while dissolution enables Ostwald ripening.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Aside from that, all systematic changes to the catalyst structure can be understood as degradation mechanisms \u0026ndash; particle migration, surface roughening, amorphization, surface oxidation, and others.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Because individual nanoparticles differ in atomic structure, composition, support anchoring, and local microenvironment, degradation is intrinsically particle-specific and therefore difficult to resolve with bulk or sparsely sampled measurements.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUnderstanding nanoparticle degradation requires correlating structural features with external stimuli. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) can provide local and highly precise surface and near-surface structural information down to the atomic scale.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Random-location ex situ studies provide particle size distributions and statistics across many nanoparticles,\u003csup\u003e23\u0026ndash;25\u003c/sup\u003e but yield only averaged insights. In situ liquid-cell TEM offers real-time observation of degradation,\u003csup\u003e26\u003c/sup\u003e yet faces challenges such as beam effects and limited spatial resolution.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIdentical-location STEM (IL-STEM) addresses these limitations by imaging the same nanoparticles before and after electrochemical treatment. This enables direct knowledge of local history, providing reliable insights into degradation pathways.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e IL-(S)TEM was already proven as effective in studying the structure-stability relationship of electrocatalysts,\u003csup\u003e27\u0026ndash;32\u003c/sup\u003e including Pt-Co systems, where potential cycling revealed dissolution and redeposition at specific sites.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e However, IL-STEM studies typically analyze only a handful of particles.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e While this particle-by-particle \u0026ldquo;bottom-up\u0026rdquo; approach identifies mechanisms, it does not capture the statistical diversity of real electrocatalyst ensembles. Conversely, conventional random-location imaging covers many particles but lacks local history. Furthermore, both approaches miss interparticle interactions, leaving a gap in the quantitative understanding of degradation at scale. Closing this gap requires scaling up IL-STEM to encompass a greater number of nanoparticles and their interactions, together with a reliable automated data analysis pipeline. This would provide statistically meaningful insights while retaining local history.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAlgorithms not only accelerate analysis but also minimize human bias and ensure reproducibility.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Among the various proposed methods for automating (S)TEM image analysis using sophisticated algorithms, a significant number focus on object segmentation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e While many have tackled the segmentation of nanoparticles\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR38 CR39 CR40 CR41\" citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and other nanostructures,\u003csup\u003e43\u0026ndash;49\u003c/sup\u003e overlapping particles remain difficult to resolve, even with advanced machine learning. Addressing this challenge is crucial for reliable large-scale IL-STEM studies of practical electrocatalysts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHere, we demonstrate how IL-STEM can be scaled up to analyze hundreds of Pt\u0026ndash;Co/C nanoparticles subjected to different electrochemical protocols. We establish a three-step image analysis workflow comprising segmentation, tracking, and degradation-event classification, progressively automating each step. The pipeline enables robust quantification of degradation mechanisms and reveals which particle types are most susceptible. Experimental observations are complemented with theoretical modeling to contextualize the degradation processes. This study advances IL-STEM from a qualitative, small-sample method to a scalable, quantitative tool, providing statistically grounded, data-driven insights into nanoparticle stability.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003ea. Scaling up identical-location STEM for Pt-Co catalytic nanoparticles\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA commercial Pt\u0026ndash;Co/C electrocatalyst was selected to quantify degradation mechanisms. The catalyst consists of Pt\u0026ndash;Co nanoparticles supported on Vulcan XC-72 carbon, with an average particle size of 2\u0026ndash;3 nm, a total (Pt\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Co) metal loading of ~\u0026thinsp;20 wt%, and a nominal Pt:Co atomic ratio of 1:1. Previous studies showed that, while the overall ratio is 1:1, the sample also contains some pure Co particles, making the Pt-Co nanoparticles richer in Pt.\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e STEM imaging (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;1\u003c/strong\u003e) shows the morphology of the carbon support and the dispersion of Pt\u0026ndash;Co nanoparticles, which are typically only a few nanometers in size. XRD (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;2\u003c/strong\u003e) confirms the Pt-Co Fm-3m disordered alloy phase with small crystallites, as evident from the broad (111), (200), and (220) diffraction maxima, and the carbon support with a broad peak near 25\u0026deg;. Narrow reflections are consistent with pure Co.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn a previous study, this catalyst was activated using an MFE setup with 200 cycles between 0.05 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at 300 mV s⁻\u0026sup1; in an inert atmosphere.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e IL-STEM imaging at atomic resolution revealed structural variations among individual nanoparticles, but the number of particles that can be studied at this detail is inherently limited, and the impact of the local environment is difficult to assess. To expand the analysis, we revisited lower-magnification IL-STEM image pairs from that dataset (the \u0026ldquo;activation dataset\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ea illustrates the workflow: IL-STEM images were acquired before and after catalyst activation in the modified floating electrode. Nanoparticles were annotated in both sets of images, linked across the before and after states, and grouped into degradation events. Most events involved two particle masks (one per image), cases where a particle appeared in only one image were recorded as single-mask events, while merging of several particles was represented by multiple masks. Here, a mask is a binary image in which pixels corresponding to the particle are marked, providing a clear outline of its shape.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvents were categorized into degradation mechanisms using a decision tree (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eb). The decision tree incorporates simple geometric descriptors (particle number, diameter, circularity, and local environment) to assign each event to a distinct degradation mechanism or to confirm no significant change (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ec). This framework reduces complex degradation phenomena to a set of interpretable rules, enabling mechanism-specific classification across large datasets. In doing so, IL-STEM evolves from a primarily descriptive tool into a robust quantitative method for probing electrocatalyst stability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMost outcomes can be traced to two primary degradation mechanisms: platinum dissolution and carbon corrosion. Under the present conditions, platinum dissolution is known to trigger cobalt dissolution,\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e so the shrinkage observed here (defined as dissolution in Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eb) refers to overall nanoparticle loss rather than to a single element. The decision tree was designed based on prior studies of Pt-based nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e A 5% tolerance was included in the selected criteria to account for segmentation uncertainty, typically at least one pixel around a particle, and to avoid labeling tiny variations as degradation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe activation dataset contained 209 events, which were classified using the decision tree. Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea shows the size and circularity distributions before and after activation for mechanisms with at least ten events. Most nanoparticles are near-spherical with diameters of 2 to 6 nm. \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table\u0026nbsp;1\u003c/strong\u003e summarizes mean values and standard deviations for each category.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExamining dissolution events, defined as particles getting smaller, shows that they are most prevalent among nearly spherical nanoparticles. Nanoparticles that remain unchanged display a similar circularity range but a slightly smaller average diameter. Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb displays the frequency of each degradation mechanism. These two groups of events account for about one-half and one-fifth of all events, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSmaller nanoparticles are more prone to complete detachment from the carbon support, and newly attached particles observed only after activation also tend to be smaller. During agglomeration, small and circular nanoparticles combine into larger, less circular agglomerates, whereas deposition events typically yield larger spherical particles. Detachments make up more than 10% of all events, and attachment, agglomeration, and deposition each account for 4\u0026ndash;6%. No other mechanisms were identified.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese results highlight correlations between particle characteristics and degradation pathways, but the infrequency of some mechanisms limits firm conclusions. For instance, there are only 13 attachment events, so a few occurrences can significantly influence the trends. While the activation dataset of 209 events from six pairs of IL-STEM images provides a useful proof of concept, larger datasets are needed for more robust conclusions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo this end, a second dataset, referred to as the degradation dataset, was collected for the same electrocatalyst. The MFE setup was used for an activation protocol of 200 cycles between 0.05 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at 300 mV/s, followed by a degradation protocol of 5,000 cycles between 0.4 and 1.2 V at 1 V/s. IL-STEM images were recorded before and after the entire protocol. \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;3\u003c/strong\u003e shows the initial and final cyclic voltammograms for both protocol segments on two TEM grids. Activation yielded a platinum-like signal within the chosen potential window under an inert atmosphere. During degradation, only minor changes occurred: the final voltammogram exhibited slightly lower current, consistent with a decrease in active sites.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA larger IL-STEM dataset was collected, resulting in 696 events that were analyzed as previously. Figure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea includes the size and circularity distributions for all events and individual degradation mechanisms, and Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb summarizes their frequencies. \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table\u0026nbsp;2\u003c/strong\u003e lists average sizes and circularities for each mechanism.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe degradation dataset largely followed the same trends as the activation dataset. The activation protocol likely stabilized the catalyst structure, leading to only minor additional changes during subsequent degradation. The particle distribution in the initial state was nearly identical, confirming that we obtained images of representative areas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeveral conclusions are consistent across both datasets. Dissolved and unchanged nanoparticles show similar diameter and circularity distributions, while smaller particles are predominantly involved in attachment and detachment processes. Some findings are more pronounced in the degradation dataset due to improved statistics. With more than three times the number of events, less frequent mechanisms could be examined with greater confidence. For example, attachment events exhibit a broader circularity distribution, and detachment occurs preferentially in spherical particles. Dissolution remains the dominant mechanism in both datasets, followed by unchanged particles, but the degradation dataset shows a higher proportion of unchanged particles, detachments, and depositions, and fewer dissolutions and agglomerations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe degradation dataset also revealed a few Ostwald ripening events, absent in the manually annotated activation dataset. Although they might be interpreted as agglomeration followed by reshaping, the scarcity of reshaping events makes this unlikely. The higher frequency of detachments reduces accessible surface area, consistent with the lower currents observed after degradation, as indicated by the diminished Pt features in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;3\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA larger dataset certainly improves the statistical analysis. Nevertheless, even the activation dataset, developed from merely six pairs of IL-STEM images, provided meaningful insights into the behavior of Pt-Co nanoparticles under electrochemical stimuli.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInterestingly, unchanged nanoparticles were more frequent in the degradation dataset despite the longer electrochemical treatment. \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Tables\u0026nbsp;1 and 2\u003c/strong\u003e show no clear patterns apart from slight shrinkage during activation. Several factors may account for this apparent stability. A comparison of Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb and Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb suggests dissolution followed by redeposition, restoring particle size. A prior atomic-resolution study of Pt-Co nanoparticles during potential cycling likewise observed both dissolution and new atomic columns, consistent with redeposition.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Some particles may also have been shielded from the electrolyte by carbon layers or complete embedding, making them inactive. Because most imaged particles overlap with the carbon support, the extent of this effect is hard to judge. Another factor to consider when comparing the unchanged nanoparticles from the activation and degradation datasets is electrolyte pH, previously reported to influence platinum dissolution under cyclic voltammetry conditions.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Finally, some nanoparticles may simply possess inherently higher stability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLarge-scale IL-STEM data provide quantitative insight into which nanoparticle types are more likely to maintain their structure during potential cycling. Typically, spherical nanoparticles of average size are most stable, although similar particles may also undergo dissolution. In contrast, small or irregularly shaped nanoparticles rarely remain unchanged, suggesting that limiting their number could improve catalyst design. The current analysis cannot address the effects of local composition or crystal structure, which would require a multi-modal IL-EM.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrevious studies support these observations. Time- and potential-resolved dissolution experiments showed that 3 nm Pt nanoparticles dissolve more readily than 30 nm ones.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Similarly, Pt particles between 2 and 10 nm dissolve faster at smaller sizes under wide potential cycling windows.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e These trends are also consistent with particle-size-dependent potential\u0026ndash;pH diagrams.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e While shape effects have been explored mostly in the context of deliberately synthesizing defined morphologies, fewer studies compare stability across particle shapes within a single sample.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Applying scaled-up IL-STEM to broader datasets with diverse degradation protocols would allow predictive correlations between particle size, shape, environment, and electrochemical conditions, ultimately guiding the design of both stable catalysts and optimized operating protocols.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eComplementary electrochemical characterization of the same Pt-Co/C catalyst by rotating disk electrode and EDX analysis supports these findings.\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e As shown in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Fig.\u0026nbsp;4\u003c/strong\u003e, the ECSA decreased modestly after degradation relative to activation. The Pt:Co ratio shifted notably toward Pt during activation but remained within error during degradation. These results agree with current findings, which indicate that degradation introduces fewer changes than activation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere are potential risks and limitations to this type of analysis. The main trade-off is resolution: while atomic-resolution IL-STEM can provide detailed insights into individual nanoparticles, extending such analysis to hundreds of particles is not yet feasible. Achieving this throughput would require fully automated atomic-resolution STEM imaging, a technical frontier still to be realized. In addition, systematic errors such as grid wrinkling, imperfect annotation, and limited statistics on rare degradation mechanisms may also influence the results.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003eb. Step-by-step automation of large-scale IL-STEM analysis\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the long run, the process of preparing the dataset should be automated, especially particle segmentation. This task remains challenging even for advanced algorithms because images often contain overlapping nanoparticles. Although the Pt-Co particles were generally well dispersed on carbon due to the relatively low metal loading, several instances of overlap were observed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn HAADF-STEM images, the overlapping region appears significantly lighter than the rest of the nanoparticle. A classical algorithm could, in principle, correctly assign the overlapping region to both neighboring nanoparticles, but the process becomes more complex when there are multiple overlapping nanoparticles or when one particle is out of focus. Watershed segmentation is sometimes used, but it typically underestimates particle areas by splitting the overlap between neighbors. More advanced approaches are therefore needed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHere, we implemented a neural-network-based particle detection to tackle the challenge of partially overlapping supported nanoparticles. Once trained, the network identified nanoparticles in new images and reported their radii and circularities. Because some annotated images were reserved for training, the total number of analyzed particles was smaller. Two representative test images with successful detection of overlapping nanoparticles are shown in \u003cstrong\u003eFig.\u0026nbsp;4a\u003c/strong\u003e. The neural network correctly detects instances of nanoparticles, even when there is significant overlap among them.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eModel performance was evaluated against manual annotations. Although the model predicts circularity with good numerical accuracy, achieving a relative error of just 5.65%, particles with a low circularity remain a challenge, likely due to their rarity in the training set. Particle size predictions had a relative error of 11.93%, but deviations were not biased toward particular sizes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe particle detections were used for analysis as previously. Figure 4c shows mechanism frequencies for the activation and degradation datasets, obtained with automated particle detection and manual particle association. \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Tables\u0026nbsp;3 and 4\u003c/strong\u003e summarize particle sizes and circularities by mechanism, and \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Figs.\u0026nbsp;5 and 6\u003c/strong\u003e contain the scatter plots with histograms. Compared to the ground truth values in Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb for the activation dataset and Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb for the degradation one, dissolution is again recognized as the most frequent degradation mechanism, followed by unchanged nanoparticles. In the second case, they are correctly followed by detachment and deposition events.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever, there are discrepancies when it comes to less frequently occurring mechanisms, especially in the smaller activation dataset. Automated detections also produced higher standard deviations for particle sizes, although mean values remained close to manual ones. Trends such as smaller diameters for attached and detached particles were still reproduced. By contrast, circularity-based distinctions were less clear, partly due to difficulties in recognizing agglomerated particles, which likely contributed to missed agglomeration events and the higher fraction of depositions. Similarly, this workflow does not capture the full morphological diversity of attached particles. In the degradation dataset, these issues were less pronounced, indicating more robust performance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNonetheless, the neural-network-based particle detection combined with manual particle association still returns reliable insights into the dominant degradation mechanisms for Pt-Co nanoparticles undergoing potential cycling. Crucially, the network handled overlapping nanoparticles well, a prerequisite for scaling up IL-STEM analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to segmentation, connecting masks between IL-STEM images can also be automated. Here, we implemented a heuristic algorithm to form events based on potential degradation mechanisms. The process involved several steps: aligning the two images, matching particles with overlapping masks, identifying particles missing in one image or merged into larger features, and resolving any remaining candidates. This workflow was developed on the activation dataset without further tuning before applying it to the degradation dataset. Results for a representative image pair are shown in \u003cstrong\u003eFig.\u0026nbsp;4b\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 4d\u003c/strong\u003e summarizes the outcomes of automated particle association applied to manually segmented particles. The dominant mechanisms of dissolution, unchanged particles, and detachment were correctly identified in both datasets. Discrepancies arose mainly in less frequent categories, such as attachment and deposition during activation, and some activation events were misclassified as Ostwald ripening. In the degradation dataset, the mechanism order was consistent, although attachment increased and agglomeration decreased. These findings confirm that the algorithm was not overfit to the activation dataset and can be used for other images.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Tables\u0026nbsp;5 and 6\u003c/strong\u003e compare particle sizes and circularities obtained with automated association of manually annotated particles (scatter plots with histograms in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Figs.\u0026nbsp;7 and 8\u003c/strong\u003e). While the results generally agree, 10% fewer events were analyzed due to missed matches, especially in crowded regions with overlapping nanoparticles. Some overlooked and mismatched particles lead to deviations in determined particle sizes and circularities, especially with less common mechanisms, where a few outliers can significantly affect results. For instance, in the degradation dataset, agglomerated nanoparticles and particles post-complete Ostwald ripening are not larger than the initial particles. Additionally, particles exhibit a narrowed circularity range after attachment, with non-circular particles often being excluded from analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDespite these limitations, the approach provides useful insights into the prevalence of different degradation mechanisms, particularly in images of well-dispersed nanoparticles. Like the decision tree, the heuristic process can be tailored to expected physical processes between two IL-STEM images. Once implemented, it can be applied repeatedly, saving analysis time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFinally, we consider the fully automated pipeline, which integrates both particle detection and association across IL-STEM image pairs. Results are shown in \u003cstrong\u003eFig.\u0026nbsp;4e, Supplementary Figs.\u0026nbsp;9 and 10\u003c/strong\u003e, and summarized in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Tables\u0026nbsp;7 and 8\u003c/strong\u003e. Despite accumulated uncertainty, the core findings are preserved. Dissolution remains the most frequent degradation mechanism, followed by unchanged particles, while detached particles are consistently smaller. For attached particles, the trend of reduced size is also present in most cases, though it becomes less clear when both detection and linking are fully automated, reflecting increased size variance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDataset size influences reliability. In the smaller activation dataset, detection errors disproportionately affect the classification of rare mechanisms. By contrast, the degradation dataset shows fewer discrepancies, and random errors tend to be statistically diluted. This highlights a central consideration: automation is more reliable and meaningful when applied to large datasets. As data volume increases, statistical robustness improves, making manual processing impractical at scale. While automated methods effectively reveal dominant trends despite minor errors, manual annotation is still best for analyzing rare or subtle phenomena, even if it means fewer particles are examined.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe most notable is the confusion between agglomeration and deposition, especially in the activation dataset, where agglomeration is underrepresented and deposition overestimated. This distinction is not trivial, as it can directly affect the scientific understanding of material behavior. That said, these two mechanisms are not among the most frequent, which somewhat limits the broader impact of this issue.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEach layer of automation reduces accuracy but offers substantial efficiency gains. The trained detection model and association algorithm can now be deployed rapidly across large datasets that would be impractical to process manually. The fully automated pipeline reliably captures dominant mechanisms and size trends. We recommend full automation primarily for large-scale studies, and only once the robustness of the procedure has been adequately validated.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003ec. Theoretical modeling of Pt-Co particle evolution during activation\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe experimental findings were further contextualized with theoretical models. Eleven nanoparticles from one IL-STEM image set in the activation dataset were selected, and two primary degradation mechanisms (metal dissolution and carbon corrosion) were modeled to describe common pathways such as dissolution, detachment, and agglomeration. Detailed mathematical formulations are provided in the Supporting Information.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e summarizes how particle size and embedment in the carbon support evolve during the activation protocol. Geometric parameters before and after simulation are listed in \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Table\u0026nbsp;10\u003c/strong\u003e, while Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea shows the selected Pt-Co nanoparticles and their color assignments used in the plots.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe simulations (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eb) indicate that dissolution proceeds more rapidly for smaller particles, accelerating as size decreases. This is coupled with enhanced carbon corrosion, reflected in large changes in particle\u0026ndash;support contact area (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ec-d). Size reduction can directly cause dissolution or promote detachment, either through complete loss of the particle or through weakened adhesion from interfacial corrosion.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOverall, corrosion appears substantial, with interfacial area changes comparable to initial values under the simplifying assumption of a \u0026pi;/2 contact angle. It should be noted that this is the result for a simplified model that does not consider all aspects of the inherently complex catalyst structure. Assuming a uniform contact angle may be questionable, and a lower initial value for detached particles could lead to the same pattern of agglomeration at a much slower carbon corrosion rate. In any case, once a particle shrinks below a critical size, it is more likely to be lost through dissolution or detachment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBoth dissolution and corrosion thus play central roles in detachment. The process of agglomeration, as explained using adhesion and attractive forces in Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ee, provides additional insight. As particles shrink or corrode, adhesion to carbon decreases. At the same time, attractive forces between nearby particles, which depend on their size and distance, can become more significant. For some particles (e.g., 9 and 10 in Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea), attraction eventually surpasses adhesion, leading to detachment and reattachment to a neighbor.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese models provide mechanistic insight inaccessible to IL-STEM alone. Although simplified relative to experimental reality, they help explain how nanoscale processes such as corrosion-driven detachment and agglomeration govern the long-term structural evolution of catalyst layers.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe developed a method to quantify the contributions of different degradation mechanisms in a commercial Pt-Co/C oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst subjected to activation and degradation protocols. By scaling up identical-location STEM to hundreds of nanoparticles, we move beyond the small sample sizes of previous studies and achieve statistically meaningful insights. Dissolution was the dominant process, followed by unchanged particles and detachments, while agglomeration, attachment, and deposition were far less frequent. The analysis also revealed clear size- and shape-dependent trends, with smaller and irregular particles being more susceptible to degradation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo enable large-scale IL-STEM, we established a three-step image analysis workflow comprising segmentation, tracking, and degradation-event classification. Automation, including the use of machine learning, reduced manual effort while preserving accuracy, though manual inspection remains useful for small datasets or rare events. The microscopy results were consistent with electrochemical measurements, while theoretical models provided further mechanistic context.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work demonstrates that scaled-up IL-STEM, combined with automated analysis, enables quantitative and unbiased mapping of nanoparticle degradation pathways. Such statistically grounded insights cannot be obtained from random-location imaging or small-scale IL-STEM. In the long term, extending automation to the imaging process itself could realize fully autonomous, closed-loop microscopy, accelerating the discovery of durable fuel cell electrocatalysts.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003ea.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Material\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA Pt-Co/C reference electrocatalyst was purchased from FuelCellStore.\u003csup\u003e55\u003c/sup\u003e The catalyst was described as Pt-Co alloy nanoparticles with an average size of 2-3 nanometers on Vulcan XC-72 carbon support. The total metal loading was stated as 20 wt.% with a 1:1 molar ratio of Pt to Co.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eb.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Powder X-ray diffraction\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eXRD patterns were collected using a PANalytical X\u0026rsquo;Pert PRO MPD diffractometer with Cu K\u0026alpha;\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e radiation (\u0026lambda; = 1.5406 \u0026Aring;) in the 2\u0026theta; range from 10\u0026deg; to 80\u0026deg; with a step size of 0.034\u0026deg; and a holding time of 850 s. Four scans were collected under the same instrumental conditions and summed up. Samples were prepared on a Fe holder.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ec.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Scanning transmission electron microscopy\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSTEM imaging was performed in a probe Cs-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope Jeol ARM 200 CF. The accelerating voltage was 80 kV, and the convergence semi-angle was set to ~18 mrad. The collection semi-angles for the bright-field (BF) and high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) images were 0-45 and 68-185 mrad, respectively.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA 1 mg/mL suspension of the Pt-Co/C electrocatalyst was prepared with Milli-Q water (18.2 \u0026Omega; cm). 1.5 \u0026micro;L of the suspension was dropcasted on a gold holey-carbon-coated TEM grid (Agar Scientific) and dried at room temperature (RT).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIdentical-location imaging involved collecting STEM data from the same locations both before and after sample treatment. Several spots were identified and imaged at various magnifications to assist in tracking them. All images were captured under identical instrumental conditions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ed.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Sample treatment\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSample treatment, aimed at introducing structural changes to the Pt-Co/C electrocatalyst, was carried out using a modified floating electrode (MFE) setup. The setup featured a two-piece Teflon housing, with a metallic spring positioned between two metallic cones. A gas diffusion layer (thickness 280 \u0026mu;m) with 40% Teflon weight wet proofing (Toray Carbon Paper 090, FuelCellStore), was used as a separator between the metallic cones and the TEM grid. The TEM grid assumed the role of the working electrode.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMFE experiments were done in a three-electrode setup with 0.1 M HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e (70 % Rotipuran Supra, Carl Roth, diluted by Milli-Q, 18.2 M\u0026Omega; cm) as the electrolyte. A reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE, HydroFlex, Gaskatel) was used as a reference electrode, and a Pt mesh was used as a counter electrode. A gas tube was inserted in the holes in the Teflon housing to purge the system with the chosen gas.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe electrochemical protocol was carried out with a BioLogic SP-200 potentiostat. First, the system was purged with argon. The catalyst was activated with 200 cyclic voltammograms between 0.05 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at a scan rate of 300 mV/s, followed by degradation with 5000 cycles between 0.4 and 1.2 V vs. RHE at 1 V/s. Finally, the grid was washed with Milli-Q water and dried at RT.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe same protocol was also carried out with a PalmSens EmStat4X potentiostat and a Pt wire as a counter electrode on an identically prepared sample to investigate the reproducibility of the measurements and mitigate external effects on the signal.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ee.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Image analysis\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor a detailed analysis, images of specific magnifications were selected based on the relation between the pixel size and the average nanoparticle size. In the activation dataset, pixel sizes from 0.022 to 0.061 nm were considered. In the degradation dataset, all analyzed images were collected with a pixel size of 0.036 nm. Nanoparticles in IL-STEM images were annotated manually to produce particle masks using the Supervisely platform.\u003csup\u003e56\u003c/sup\u003e Each mask was defined by two geometric parameters: equivalent sphere diameter and circularity, both calculated from the measured areas and perimeters. The equivalent sphere diameter was determined as:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"\" width=\"167\" height=\"39\"\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCircularity was defined as:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"\" width=\"196\" height=\"36\"\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParticle masks in IL-STEM images were connected to form events, allowing us to track each annotated nanoparticle. Only particles that did not touch the edges of the images were considered. To automate particle association, a heuristic algorithm was developed to align two sets of masks and then connect them based on their proximity and similarity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese events were then classified into distinct degradation mechanisms using a decision tree. Equivalent sphere diameters of particle masks were converted to real-space quantities using image calibrations. The code for analyzing particle masks was written in Python using open-source libraries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo automate particle detection in raw images, a neural network was considered, which received BF- and HAADF-STEM images and returned regressed values of particle radii and circularities. A Center-direction Regression Network (CeDiRNet) for point-based object detection was utilized.\u003csup\u003e57\u003c/sup\u003e The network was further extended for regressing particle radius and circularity as a dense map prediction following a similar extension for orientations in CeDiRNet-3DoF.\u003csup\u003e58\u003c/sup\u003e A more detailed description can be found in the \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Note 1\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePairs of manually annotated BF- and HAADF-STEM images of the same regions of interest were used as channels to construct two-channel images. These images served for training and testing the neural network. We utilized 12 pairs of images depicting carbon-supported platinum-nickel nanoparticles, which were taken of a material used in a previous study.\u003csup\u003e59\u003c/sup\u003e We also included several pairs of images of the commercial Pt-Co/C electrocatalyst. However, these were excluded from the final analysis to avoid using the same nanoparticles for both training and analysis. In total, 23 pairs of images were used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhenever the resulting detections were used for subsequent analysis, particle binary masks were constructed with a size matching the original size of STEM images, and results were calibrated in real space.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ef.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;Modelling\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA mathematical model of catalyst particle degradation was used to explain the processes involved in the changes observed during activation. The model is based on previously developed models, describing the changes in the size distribution of catalyst particles,\u003csup\u003e60\u0026ndash;62\u003c/sup\u003e modified to explain the evolution of individual particles. Activation was described using the same parameters as were used experimentally.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe model describes two primary degradation mechanisms: particle growth or shrinkage due to dissolution and redeposition, and particle detachment, migration, and agglomeration due to corrosion of the carbon support.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElectrochemical dissolution and redeposition of the catalyst from the particles were modelled using the Butler-Volmer equation, with the effect of particle size incorporated as a Kelvin term in the equilibrium potential.\u003csup\u003e63\u003c/sup\u003e The reaction rate is primarily determined by the electrical potential applied to the catalyst. Diffusion of dissolved catalyst ions between particles was modelled using a finite volume method, with regions of space for each particle defined by a Voronoi diagram.\u003csup\u003e64\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCorrosion of carbon support results from electrochemical reactions between surface oxides on the catalyst and carbon support, which were also modelled using Butler-Volmer equations. The corrosion rate is used to determine the change in contact surface and, consequently, the adhesion force between catalyst particles and carbon support, which counteracts the attractive forces between particles. Once the contact surface is sufficiently reduced, the particle is free to move in the direction of the net force and potentially agglomerate with another particle.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDegradation processes were described as a set of differential equations, describing the size and 3 spatial coordinates of each particle, as well as oxidation of its surface (surface coverage of hydroxide and oxide groups), oxidation of carbon surface in its vicinity (surface coverage of hydroxide and oxide groups), concentration of dissolved catalyst ion in its vicinity, and contact surface between particle and carbon support, resulting in total of 10 differential equations for each modelled particle.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEquations were solved in the Python programming language using the routine solve_ivp from the Scipy package.\u003csup\u003e65\u003c/sup\u003e Details of the modelling procedure can be found in the \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Note 2\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eEthics declarations\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA.R.K., G.D., and N.H. designed and supervised the project. A.R.K. conceived the idea, analyzed the data, automated particle association, and wrote the initial paper. J.V. annotated the data and contributed to data analysis. D.T. automated particle detection using a neural network under the supervision of D.S. A.L. carried out electrochemical treatments using MFE. F.R.-Z. performed IL-STEM. A.K. performed numerical simulations. All authors discussed the results and contributed to editing the paper.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBlaž Lipar is acknowledged for his help with data annotation, and Edi Kranjc is acknowledged for XRD measurements. The authors would like to acknowledge the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) through programs P2-0393, I0\u0026ndash;0003, and P2-0401; the projects J2-3041, N2-0257, and J7-4637; the grant Artificial Intelligence for Science (GC-0001); and European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant 123STABLE (grant agreement ID: 852208). A.R.K. acknowledges the Janko Jamnik scholarship.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eData availability\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRaw experimental data (XRD pattern, MFE measurements, ex-situ and identical-location STEM images) are available at \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17158369\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eCode availability\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe code to analyze IL-STEM data is available at \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17158369\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaum ZJ, Diaz LL, Konovalova T, Zhou QA (2022) Materials Research Directions Toward a Green Hydrogen Economy: A Review. ACS Omega 7:32908\u0026ndash;32935\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJiao K et al (2021) Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature 595:361\u0026ndash;369\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBanham D, Ye S (2017) Current status and future development of catalyst materials and catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: An industrial perspective. ACS Energy Lett 2:629\u0026ndash;638\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJanssen M, Weber P, Oezaslan M (2023) Recent advances of various Pt-based catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Curr Opin Electrochem 40:101337\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eProkop M, Drakselova M, Bouzek K (2020) Review of the experimental study and prediction of Pt-based catalyst degradation during PEM fuel cell operation. Curr Opin Electrochem 20:20\u0026ndash;27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoriau LJ et al (2021) Resolving the nanoparticles\u0026rsquo; structure-property relationships at the atomic level: a study of Pt-based electrocatalysts. \u003cem\u003eiScience\u003c/em\u003e 24, 102102\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim HY, Kim JY, Joo SH (2021) Pt-based Intermetallic Nanocatalysts for Promoting the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Bull Korean Chem Soc 42:724\u0026ndash;736\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBandarenka AS, Koper MTM (2013) Structural and electronic effects in heterogeneous electrocatalysis: Toward a rational design of electrocatalysts. J Catal 308:11\u0026ndash;24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuo M, Guo S (2017) Strain-controlled electrocatalysis on multimetallic nanomaterials. Nat Rev Mater 2:1\u0026ndash;14\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarlyyev B et al (2019) Revealing the nature of active sites in electrocatalysis. Chem Sci 10:8060\u0026ndash;8075\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim S et al (2021) Correlating 3D Surface Atomic Structure and Catalytic Activities of Pt Nanocrystals. Nano Lett 21:1175\u0026ndash;1183\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKodama K, Nagai T, Kuwaki A, Jinnouchi R, Morimoto Y (2021) Challenges in applying highly active Pt-based nanostructured catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions to fuel cell vehicles. Nat Nanotechnol 16:140\u0026ndash;147\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZaman S et al (2021) Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts toward Practical Fuel Cells: Progress and Perspectives. Angewandte Chemie - Int Ed 60:17832\u0026ndash;17852\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEhelebe K, Escalera-L\u0026oacute;pez D, Cherevko S (2021) Limitations of aqueous model systems in the stability assessment of electrocatalysts for oxygen reactions in fuel cell and electrolyzers. Curr Opin Electrochem 29:100832\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeier JC et al (2014) Design criteria for stable Pt/C fuel cell catalysts. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:44\u0026ndash;67\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHodnik N, Dehm G, Mayrhofer KJJ (2016) Importance and Challenges of Electrochemical in Situ Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy for Energy Conversion Research. Acc Chem Res 49:2015\u0026ndash;2022\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026iacute;n AJ, Mitchell S, Mondelli C, Jaydev S (2022) P\u0026eacute;rez-Ram\u0026iacute;rez, J. Unifying views on catalyst deactivation. Nat Catal 5:854\u0026ndash;866\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang M et al (2025) Oxygen reduction electrocatalyst degradation and mitigation strategies in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl Catal B 367\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGunnarson A et al (2023) Stability Investigations on a Pt@HGS Catalyst as a Model Material for Fuel Cell Applications: The Role of the Local pH. Angewandte Chemie - Int Ed 62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAarons J et al (2017) Predicting the Oxygen-Binding Properties of Platinum Nanoparticle Ensembles by Combining High-Precision Electron Microscopy and Density Functional Theory. Nano Lett 17:4003\u0026ndash;4012\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKalinin SV et al (2019) Lab on a beam-Big data and artificial intelligence in scanning transmission electron microscopy. MRS Bull 44:565\u0026ndash;575\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003evan den Bos KHW, Altantzis T, De Backer A, Van Aert S, Bals S (2018) Recent breakthroughs in scanning transmission electron microscopy of small species. Adv Phys X 3:815\u0026ndash;833\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchneider P et al (2023) Impact of Platinum Loading and Layer Thickness on Cathode Catalyst Degradation in PEM Fuel Cells. J Electrochem Soc 170:024506\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJanssen M et al (2024) Monitoring the Morphological Changes of Skeleton-PtCo Electrocatalyst during PEMFC Start-Up/Shut-Downprobed by in situ WAXS and SAXS. \u003cem\u003eChemSusChem\u003c/em\u003e 17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuillet F, Chatenet M, Paul A, Svecova L, Dubau L (2024) Electrochemical recovery of Pt/C electrocatalyst: optimization of the potential range on the leaching process and application to an aged MEA. Industrial Chem Mater 2:118\u0026ndash;131\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim S et al (2025) Unraveling Serial Degradation Pathways of Supported Catalysts through Reliable Electrochemical Liquid-Cell TEM Analysis. J Am Chem Soc 147:181\u0026ndash;191\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeier JC et al (2012) Degradation mechanisms of Pt/C fuel cell catalysts under simulated start-stop conditions. ACS Catal 2:832\u0026ndash;843\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVega-Paredes M et al (2023) Electrochemical Stability of Rhodium-Platinum Core-Shell Nanoparticles: An Identical Location Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Study. ACS Nano 17:16943\u0026ndash;16951\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVion-Dury B, Chatenet M, Gu\u0026eacute;taz L, Maillard F (2011) Determination of Aging Markers and their Use as a Tool to Characterize Pt/C Nanoparticles Degradation Mechanism in Model PEMFC Cathode Environment. ECS Trans 41:697\u0026ndash;708\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHodnik N, Cherevko S (2019) Spot the difference at the nanoscale: identical location electron microscopy in electrocatalysis. Curr Opin Electrochem 15:73\u0026ndash;82\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShokhen V, Strandberg L, Skoglundh M, Wickman B (2023) Fuel cell electrode degradation followed by identical location transmission electron microscopy. J Mater Chem Mater 11:21029\u0026ndash;21035\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrandberg L, Shokhen V, Skoglundh M, Wickman B (2024) Carbon Support Corrosion in PEMFCs Followed by Identical Location Electron Microscopy. ACS Catal 14:8494\u0026ndash;8504\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHrnjic A et al (2021) Observing, tracking and analysing electrochemically induced atomic-scale structural changes of an individual Pt-Co nanoparticle as a fuel cell electrocatalyst by combining modified floating electrode and identical location electron microscopy. Electrochim Acta 388:1\u0026ndash;16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpurgeon SR et al (2021) Towards data-driven next-generation transmission electron microscopy. Nat Mater 20:274\u0026ndash;279\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRickman JM, Lookman T, Kalinin SV (2019) Materials informatics: From the atomic-level to the continuum. Acta Mater 168:473\u0026ndash;510\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBatool M, Pedram S, Jankovic J (2025) Quantification of Structural Parameters for Multicomponent Catalyst Systems. ACS Appl Energy Mater 8:8619\u0026ndash;8635Advancing Microstructural Analysis: Practical and High-Throughput AI-Based Image Processing and Automated Data Analysis Techniques for\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMacArthur KE et al (2023) Post-Synthesis Heat Treatment of Doped PtNi-Alloy Fuel-Cell Catalyst Nanoparticles Studied by In-Situ Electron Microscopy. ACS Appl Energy Mater 6:5959\u0026ndash;5967\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBell CG et al (2022) Trainable segmentation for transmission electron microscope images of inorganic nanoparticles. J Microsc 288:169\u0026ndash;184\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang SH et al (2023) Deep learning morphological distribution analysis of metal alloy catalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Mater Today Energy 36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaaim KM, Afridi SK, Nisar M, Islam S (2022) In search of best automated model: Explaining nanoparticle TEM image segmentation. Ultramicroscopy 233\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColliard-Granero A et al (2022) Deep learning for the automation of particle analysis in catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Nanoscale 14:10\u0026ndash;18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNoval JJS, G\u0026oacute;mez-Merch\u0026aacute;n R, Le\u0026ntilde;ero-Bardallo JA, Gontard LC (2023) TEMAS: A Flexible Non-AI Algorithm for Metrology of Single-Core and Core-Shell Nanoparticles from TEM Images. Part Part Syst Charact 40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColliard-Granero A, Jitsev J, Eikerling MH, Malek K, Eslamibidgoli MJ (2023) UTILE-Gen: Automated Image Analysis in Nanoscience Using Synthetic Dataset Generator and Deep Learning. ACS Nanosci Au 3:398\u0026ndash;407\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYildirim B, Cole JM (2021) Bayesian Particle Instance Segmentation for Electron Microscopy Image Quantification. J Chem Inf Model 61:1136\u0026ndash;1149\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee B et al (2020) Statistical Characterization of the Morphologies of Nanoparticles through Machine Learning Based Electron Microscopy Image Analysis. ACS Nano 14:17125\u0026ndash;17133\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCho MG et al (2024) Size-Resolved Shape Evolution in Inorganic Nanocrystals Captured via High-Throughput Deep Learning-Driven Statistical Characterization. ACS Nano 18:29736\u0026ndash;29747\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTreder KP et al (2023) nNPipe: a neural network pipeline for automated analysis of morphologically diverse catalyst systems. NPJ Comput Mater 9\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGumbiowski N, Loza K, Heggen M, Epple M (2023) Automated analysis of transmission electron micrographs of metallic nanoparticles by machine learning. Nanoscale Adv 5:2318\u0026ndash;2326\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang X et al (2021) AutoDetect-mNP: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithm for Automated Analysis of Transmission Electron Microscope Images of Metal Nanoparticles. JACS Au 1:316\u0026ndash;327\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBriega-Martos V, Stojanovski K, Zlatar M, G\u0026ouml;llner C, Cherevko S (2024) pH dependence of noble metals dissolution: Platinum. Electrochim Acta 501:144793\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJovanovič P et al (2014) New insight into platinum dissolution from nanoparticulate platinum-based electrocatalysts using highly sensitive in situ concentration measurements. ChemCatChem 6:449\u0026ndash;453\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSandbeck DJS et al (2020) Particle Size Effect on Platinum Dissolution: Considerations for Accelerated Stability Testing of Fuel Cell Catalysts. ACS Catal 10:6281\u0026ndash;6290\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCherevko S, Kulyk N, Mayrhofer KJJ (2016) Durability of platinum-based fuel cell electrocatalysts: Dissolution of bulk and nanoscale platinum. Nano Energy 29:275\u0026ndash;298\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eĐukić T et al (2022) Stability challenges of carbon-supported Pt-nanoalloys as fuel cell oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts. Chem Commun 58:13832\u0026ndash;13854\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e20% Wt Platinum Cobalt (1:1 Atomic ratio) on Vulcan. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.fuelcellstore.com/20-platinum-cobalt-vulcan\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.fuelcellstore.com/20-platinum-cobalt-vulcan\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSupervisely (2023) Supervisely Computer Vision platform. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://supervisely.com\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://supervisely.com\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTabernik D, Muhovič J, Skočaj D (2024) Dense center-direction regression for object counting and localization with point supervision. Pattern Recognit 153\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTabernik D, Muhovič J, Urbas M, Skočaj D (2024) Center Direction Network for Grasping Point Localization on Cloths. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 9:8913\u0026ndash;8920\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGatalo M et al (2022) Importance of Chemical Activation and the Effect of Low Operation Voltage on the Performance of Pt-Alloy Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts. ACS Appl Energy Mater 5:8862\u0026ndash;8877\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKregar A, Kravos A, Katrašnik T (2020) Methodology for Evaluation of Contributions of Ostwald Ripening and Particle Agglomeration to Growth of Catalyst Particles in PEM Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 20:487\u0026ndash;498\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKregar A, Tavčar G, Kravos A, Katrašnik T (2020) Predictive system-level modeling framework for transient operation and cathode platinum degradation of high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl Energy 263:114547\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKregar A, Gatalo M, Maselj N, Hodnik N, Katrašnik T (2021) Temperature dependent model of carbon supported platinum fuel cell catalyst degradation. J Power Sources 514\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePlieth WJ (1982) Electrochemical Properties of Small Clusters of Metal Atoms and Their Role in Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. J Phys Chem 86:3166\u0026ndash;3170\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVoronoi G (1908) Nouvelles applications des parametres continus a la theorie des formes quadratiques. Sur quelques proprietes des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. J f\u0026uuml;r die reine und angewandte Math 133:97\u0026ndash;102\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVirtanen P et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261\u0026ndash;272\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"National Institute of Chemistry","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"electrocatalysis, identical-location electron microscopy, nanoparticles, catalyst degradation, image analysis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7656978/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7656978/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDeep mechanistic insight into electrocatalyst stability is essential to design durable, resource-efficient fuel cells. Nanoparticulate electrocatalysts degrade via diverse nanoscale processes, yet particle-to-particle heterogeneity in structure, support interaction, and local microenvironment make true particle-level quantification and understanding impossible with classical approaches. Here we scale up identical-location scanning transmission electron microscopy to track the structural evolution of hundreds of carbon-supported Pt\u0026ndash;Co nanoparticles, a prototypical oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalyst. We present a three-step image analysis workflow comprising segmentation, tracking, and degradation-event classification with progressive automation, including machine-learning-assisted segmentation of overlapping particles. By pairing nanoscale resolution and local history with population-level statistics, the pipeline enables unbiased identification and quantification of degradation pathways across statistically meaningful particle sets. We reveal clear particle size- and shape-dependent effects, showing that smaller and irregular nanoparticles are more prone to detachment. Together, these advances provide a data-driven framework for probing electrocatalyst degradation at scale, informing the rational design of next-generation materials.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Machine learning-assisted large-scale identical-location electron microscopy enables quantifying nanoparticulate electrocatalyst degradation","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-23 08:00:10","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7656978/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"2f8bc398-d788-4312-91c2-f55c4a72eeed","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 23rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-09-23T08:00:11+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-23 08:00:10","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7656978","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7656978","identity":"rs-7656978","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0