Chromatin architecture and physical constriction cooperate in phenotype switching and cancer cell dissemination

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,229 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Phenotypic plasticity is a prominent cancer feature that contributes to metastatic potential and resistance to therapy across multiple cancer types. Cancer cell state transitions have been attributed to transcriptional programs, such as the AP1/TEAD-regulated gene network driving the mesenchymal-like (MES) phenotype. In addition, during dissemination, tumor cells are subjected to variable loads of physical mechanical pressure and constriction across transited tissue, which are thought to impact nuclear molecular crowding. How the interplay between mechanical pressure, global 3D nuclear architecture and transcriptional programs contributes to MES identity and metastatic adaptation remains unclear. Using cutaneous melanoma as a model for early dissemination, we integrate in vitro and in vivo epigenomic profiling with nanoscale imaging of cell lines and patient samples to investigate chromatin organization features underlying the MES phenotype. We find that in MES cells, CTCF is relocated from domain boundaries to regulatory regions of EMT-like genes, leading to reduced insulation, extended topological associated domains (TADs) and increased inter-domain contacts, and de novo formation of chromatin hubs. This conformational rewiring, along with loss of heterochromatin, supports nuclear deformability during invasion and dissemination. Conversely, physical constriction of melanocytic cells induces MES-like chromatin features—including CTCF repositioning and heterochromatin loss— and promotes metastasis in vivo. Similarly, pharmacological inhibition of the heterochromatin mark H3K9me3 triggers MES characteristics and increases invasiveness. These results demonstrate that metastatic competency involves both epigenetic and structural nuclear reprogramming, enabling shifts in gene networks and physical adaptability. Our findings reveal mechanistic links between nuclear architecture and aggressive tumor behavior, identifying potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets to intercept metastatic progression. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes We add an additional co-author, Mr Shi Qui, and fundings references to the acknowledgments paragraph.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00