Cloche/Npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor during zebrafish heart regeneration

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 123,737 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Cloche/Npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor during zebrafish heart regeneration | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Cloche/Npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor during zebrafish heart regeneration Junjie Hou , Yabing Song , Chenglu Xiao , Yuanyuan Sun , Jie Shen , Xiaokai Ma , Qinchao Zhou , Shih-Ching Chiu , Yang Xu , View ORCID Profile Yanyi Huang , View ORCID Profile Ye-Guang Chen , Xiaojun Zhu , Jianbin Wang , Jing-Wei Xiong doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.19.639191 Junjie Hou 1 School of Basic Medical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The MOE Basic Research and Innovation Center for the Targeted Therapeutics of Solid Tumors, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University , Nanchang 330031, China 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yabing Song 3 School of Life Sciences, and Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Chenglu Xiao 1 School of Basic Medical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The MOE Basic Research and Innovation Center for the Targeted Therapeutics of Solid Tumors, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University , Nanchang 330031, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yuanyuan Sun 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jie Shen 4 Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, College of Life Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Science, and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Xiaokai Ma 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Qinchao Zhou 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Shih-Ching Chiu 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yang Xu 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yanyi Huang 4 Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, College of Life Sciences, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Science, and Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yanyi Huang Ye-Guang Chen 1 School of Basic Medical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The MOE Basic Research and Innovation Center for the Targeted Therapeutics of Solid Tumors, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University , Nanchang 330031, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Ye-Guang Chen Xiaojun Zhu 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: jingwei_xiong{at}pku.edu.cn jianbinwang{at}tsinghua.edu.cn zhuxiaojun{at}pku.edu.cn Jianbin Wang 3 School of Life Sciences, and Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: jingwei_xiong{at}pku.edu.cn jianbinwang{at}tsinghua.edu.cn zhuxiaojun{at}pku.edu.cn Jing-Wei Xiong 1 School of Basic Medical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The MOE Basic Research and Innovation Center for the Targeted Therapeutics of Solid Tumors, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University , Nanchang 330031, China 2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, and State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: jingwei_xiong{at}pku.edu.cn jianbinwang{at}tsinghua.edu.cn zhuxiaojun{at}pku.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Summary Zebrafish has full capacity of heart regeneration, but little is known about how blood cells, especially platelets, are involved in this regenerative process. Here we report that cloche/npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor for heart regeneration. We found that haploinsufficiency of npas4l disrupted cardiomyocyte (CM) and endothelial cell (EC) proliferation and heart regeneration after injury. A single-cell transcriptomic atlas revealed that npas4l was dynamically expressed in platelets after heart injury and regulated robust interactions between platelets-CMs or -ECs. Decreasing platelets by either nitroreductase-mediated platelet depletion or platelet-deficient mutant mpl impaired CM and EC proliferation, and over-expression of npas4l in platelets sufficiently induced CM and EC proliferation in uninjured hearts, as well as rescued CM and EC proliferation defects in cloche mutants. Mechanistically, Npas4l positively regulated a panel of ligands expression including bmp6 in platelets to fine-tune CM proliferation and heart regeneration. Therefore, this work unveils a novel platelet Npas4l signaling and presents mechanisms on how platelets modulate CM/EC proliferation via ligand-receptor network during zebrafish heart regeneration. Introduction Organ regeneration remains a century-old question in spite of tremendous efforts to explore the replenishment of lost cells and tissues. In mammals, heart regeneration is restricted to before postnatal day 7, whereas some lower vertebrates like zebrafish keep this regenerative capacity over a lifetime ( Tzahor and Poss, 2017 ; Zheng et al., 2021 ). Because of a lack of adult cardiac stem cells, it is generally believed that injury-induced de-differentiation and proliferation of CMs contributes to new myocyte regeneration ( Jopling et al., 2010 ; Kikuchi et al., 2010 ; Ogawa et al., 2021 ; Xiao et al., 2016 ). In addition, the synchronized regeneration of coronary vessels, along with the precise modulation of cardiac fibrosis and inflammation, create a permissive environment with essential oxygen and nutrient supplies, thereby facilitating a regenerative niche for the proliferation of new myocytes. Over the past two decades, Neuregulin1 (Nrg1), yes-associated protein (Yap), miRNA-199a-3p, Krüppel-like factor 1 (Klf1), and the small-molecule cocktail 5SM are known to efficiently promote CM proliferation, likely via de-differentiation in zebrafish and mouse heart regeneration ( Bersell et al., 2009 ; Du et al., 2022 ; Eulalio et al., 2012 ; Gemberling et al., 2015 ; Monroe et al., 2019 ; Ogawa et al., 2021 ). Other studies have shown that VEGF-Kdrl, Cxcl12b-Cxcr4a, and Vegfc-Vegfr3 are essential for cardiac angiogenesis and lympho-angiogenesis during zebrafish heart regeneration ( Harrison et al., 2015 ; Harrison et al., 2019 ; Marin-Juez et al., 2016 ), and these signals are mainly secreted by CMs or ECs. However, injured hearts are composed of various cell types that coordinate to achieve this remarkable task in a spatiotemporal fashion. It remains incompletely understood how non-myocyte signals regulate CM and coronary vessel regeneration. Derived from megakaryocytes, platelets are produced in the bone marrow with the characteristics of small size and no nuclei in mammals. Since platelets mediate thrombosis and hemostasis, they are widely involved in wound healing for bleeding arrest. However, due to their engagement in the thrombosis-inflammation response, platelets are recognized as crucial players in regulating the immune response by releasing cytokines and chemokines, thus creating an environment for tissue remodeling after injury ( Mezger et al., 2019 ). Moreover, it has been shown that platelet activation modulates heart and brain repair by regulating tissue inflammation after ischemia-reperfusion injury ( Rohlfing et al., 2022 ). Nevertheless, as an intricate secretory system, platelets release various growth factors, chemokines, and cytokines; however, their function in heart regeneration has never been addressed ( Barrientos et al., 2008 ; Golebiewska and Poole, 2015 ; Grover et al., 2018 ; Versteeg et al., 2013 ). The zebrafish cloche mutant was first discovered to affect both hematopoietic and EC lineages during zebrafish embryogenesis in 1995 ( Stainier et al., 1995 ), the first genetic interval of cloche was defined at the telomeric region of chromosome 13 in 2008 ( Xiong et al., 2008 ), and npas4l , a bHLH-PAS transcription factor, was cloned from clo s5 in 2016 ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ). As the earliest gene regulating the origin and formation of hemangioblasts, npas4l has mostly been investigated during zebrafish embryogenesis, but its function in organ regeneration especially heart regeneration has not been addressed. In this work, we aimed to search for critical molecular and cellular signaling on zebrafish heart regeneration by using single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology, cloche mutant, and heart injury models. We found, for the first time, that platelets and their Npas4l-Bmp6 signaling were essential for zebrafish heart regeneration, thus not only advancing our understanding of basic mechanisms on heart regeneration but also elucidating their potential applications for platelets and platelet-derived factors in cardiac repair and regeneration. Results Haploinsufficiency of npas4l disrupts zebrafish heart regeneration In search of abnormal heart-regeneration phenotypes in heterozygous zebrafish mutants that are normally embryonic-lethal in homozygous mutants, we found that either clo m39/+ or clo fv087b/+ mutants have abnormal heart regeneration ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ; Xiong et al., 2008 ); clo m39 is a spontaneous deletion allele, while clo fv087b is an ethylnitrosourea-induced allele in which the mutation is unknown ( Xiong et al., 2008 ). Based on the previous report that cloche encodes npas4l ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ), we performed Sanger sequencing of the npas4l coding region of wild-type sibling and clo fv087b homozygous mutant embryos, and found that in the clo fv087b mutants, the transcription start site (ATG) of npas4l was mutated to AAG ( Figure 1A ), likely resulting in blockade of npas4l translation. Since it had been shown that npas4l expression was eliminated in clo m39 mutants and either clo m39 or clo fv087b homozygous mutants are embryonic lethal ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ; Stainier et al., 1995 ), we turned to assess npas4l mRNA expression in clo fv087b/+ adult hearts by comparing with wild-type sibling hearts after ventricular resection, and found that npas4l mRNA in clo fv087b/+ hearts decreased ∼50% ( Figure 1B ). By generating an anti-Npas4l antibody against a 253 carboxyl-terminal amino-acid peptide, we found that this antibody specifically recognized over-expressed Myc-tagged Npas4l proteins in 293T cells by western blot analysis (Figure S1C). Additionally, immunofluorescence staining revealed nuclear localization of Npas4l signals in conjunction with Myc-tag signals (Figure S1D). This antibody recognized endogenous Npas4l proteins in zebrafish hearts, revealing that the levels of Npas4l protein were lower in clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts than wild-type sibling hearts at 1 day post-amputation (dpa) ( Figures 1B and 1C ). These data suggest that the clo fv087b/+ mutant has npas4l haploinsufficiency with both reduced mRNA and protein expression. To elucidate the function of npas4l haploinsufficiency in heart regeneration, we assessed fibrosis resolution and cardiac cell proliferation in both clo fv087b/+ and clo m39/+ mutants after heart amputation ( Figure 1D ). By comparing wild-type sibling and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts, we categorized the hearts into three levels of regeneration, not regenerated (severe), partially regenerated (partial), and fully regenerated (regenerated), based on the serial-section acid-fuchsin orange-G (AFOG) staining (Figure S1A). We found the clo fv087b/+ mutant exhibited more defective cardiac regeneration indicated by more fibrotic scars with AFOG staining and decreased myocardial regeneration labeled with myosin heavy chain (MHC) immunofluorescence ( Figures 1E and S1A). Consistent with this, we found that clo m39/+ hearts also had more fibrosis and collagen deposition and less regenerated myocardium than wild-type hearts at 30 dpa ( Figure 1F ). Thus, npas4l haploinsufficiency impairs zebrafish heart regeneration. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Haploinsufficiency of npas4l disrupts zebrafish heart regeneration. A Sanger sequencing of the npas4l locus of genomic DNA reveals that ATG in wild-type embryos (n=5) is mutated to AAG in clo fv087b mutant embryos (n=6) at 4 days post fertilization. B, C Quantitative RT-PCR and protein quantification ( C ) and western blot ( B ) of npas4l expression in adult zebrafish hearts at 1 dpa. mRNA loading is normalized by gapdh and protein loading by β-actin. n=3 replicates per group, and 10 hearts pooled together per replicate. Data are the mean ± SEM.; *p <0.05, **p <0.01; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. D Schematic diagram of experimental design to explore npas4l function. E Representative images and quantification of AFOG and MHC immunofluorescence staining in wild-type sibling (n=44) and clo fv087b/+ (n=30) hearts at 30 dpa. Data represents the percentage of each group; ****p <0.001; Pearson chi-square test. Scale bars, 100 μm. F Representative images and quantification of AFOG and MHC immunofluorescence staining in wild-type sibling (n=32) and clo m39/+ (n=40) hearts at 30 dpa. Data represents the percentage of each group; **p <0.01; Pearson chi-square test. Scale bars, 100 μm. G Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of BrdU-positive CMs labeled by Tg(myl7:nucDsRed) in wild-type (n=11) and clo fv087b/+ (n=10) hearts at 7 dpa. Insets are high magnification of boxed areas. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ****p <0.001; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 50 μm. H Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of PCNA-positive CMs and ECs in wild-type (n=10-12) and clo fv087b/+ (n=13-14) hearts at 7 dpa. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ****p <0.001; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 50 μm. I Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of BrdU-positive CMs and ECs in wild-type (n=13) and clo m39/+ (n=11) hearts at 7 dpa. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ***p <0.005, ****p <0.001; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 50 μm. J Representative immunofluorescence images of gata4:eGFP co-stained with MHC in wild-type (n=14) and clo fv087b/+ (n=15) hearts at 7 dpa. Scale bars, 50 μm. We next determined whether naps4l haploinsufficiency affects the CM proliferation index. By using Tg(myl7: nucDsRed) transgenic hearts, we labeled proliferative cardiomyocytes with BrdU molecules. We found the percentage of DsRed + /BrdU + proliferative CMs decreased in clo fv087b/+ hearts compared with wild-type siblings at 7 dpa ( Figures 1D and 1G ). In addition, we applied Mef2 and PCNA antibodies immunostaining to detect CM nuclei with on-going DNA replication, and found that the percentages of Mef2 + /PCNA + proliferating CMs decreased in clo fv087b/+ hearts at 7 dpa ( Figures 1D and 1H ). Consistent with this, the percentages of Mef2 + /BrdU + labeled proliferative CMs also decreased in clo m39/+ mutant hearts ( Figures 1D and 1I ). Since cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation is another important indicator for myocardial regeneration capacity, we assessed cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation with Tg(gata4: eGFP) transgenic reporter ( Figure 1D ), and found that the GFP expression was significantly reduced in clo fv087b/+ hearts at 7 dpa ( Figure 1J ). These above data demonstrated that npas4l haploinsufficiency caused a defective CM regeneration response after heart injury. Cloche is recognized as the earliest factor for the development of endothelial and hematopoietic cell lineages during zebrafish embryogenesis ( Stainier et al., 1995 ), so we next asked whether npas4l haploinsufficiency affects cardiac angiogenesis and endocardial regeneration after heart injury ( Figure 1D ). Immunostaining data showed that Fli1 + ECs in the wound region decreased in both clo fv087b/+ and clo m39/+ mutant hearts (Figures S1B and S1E). This is consistent with the EC proliferation index that the percentages of PCNA + /Fli1 + ECs, including the endocardium, were reduced in clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts at 7 dpa ( Figure 1H ); and the percentages of BrdU + /Fli1 + ECs decreased in clo m39/+ mutant hearts at 7 dpa ( Figure 1I ). In addition to myocardial and endothelial/endocardial phenotypes in heterozygous cloche mutants, we found that the numbers of coro1a-GFP + leukocytes recruited to the wound region decreased in both clo fv087b/+ and clo m39/+ mutant hearts at 3 dpa (Figures S1B and S1E). All together, these data suggest that in addition to its function in zebrafish embryogenesis ( Stainier et al., 1995 ), cloche also plays an important role in adult heart regeneration by modulating CM and EC proliferation and leukocyte recruitment after injury. scRNA-seq reveals a potential role of npas4l in platelets within the context of cardiac regeneration To address the cellular and molecular mechanisms regulated by Npas4l, we applied 10x Genomics technology to construct a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of wild-type sibling and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts in sham-operated zebrafish, and at 3 dpa and 7 dpa. To maintain the cells in the indigenous state and reduce artificial effects caused by cell disassociation, we applied a psychrophilic protease ( Adam et al., 2017 ) and maintained the entire cell disassociation process at 4°C before processing to single-cell sorting and library preparation ( Figure 2A ). After sequencing and data processing, we clustered and visualized >60,000 single cells in t-SNE dimensionality reduction plots, which consisted of populations of CMs, ECs, epicardium, fibroblasts, immunocytes, erythrocytes, and platelets ( Figures 2B , 2C , S2A, S2B and Table S1). Importantly, we found a high enrichment of CMs, which accounted for 44.08% of total cells in our single-cell data. A previous scRNA-seq study had reported that captured CMs displayed much lower transcript counts than non-myocytes, indicating that they might detect transcripts from nuclei rather than cells ( Hu et al., 2022 ). For that reason, we checked in our data and found that the transcript counts and gene counts for CMs were comparable to those of non-myocytes, indicating that we captured intact cells rather than nuclei (Figures S2C and S2D). Among other cell types, we noted two groups of epicardium distinguished by expression of the epicardial activation marker tcf21 ( Figures 2C and S2B). We found an induction of tcf21 + epicardium that was consistent with epicardial activation after injury (Figure S2E). As for immunocyte populations, we acquired T cells, B cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and glial cells. We detected a significant induction of macrophages and neutrophils at 3 dpa, reflecting the inflammatory response to heart injury at early regenerative stages (Figure S2E). Collectively, we constructed a comprehensive single-cell atlas covering the major cell types of regenerating adult zebrafish hearts. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals npas4l expression in platelets during heart regeneration. A Flowchart of single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) by 10x Genomics of adult zebrafish hearts. B t-SNE visualization of clusters of 62,522 cells from both wild-type sibling and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts. C Marker gene expression in each cluster presented in t-SNE (upper) and violin plots (middle), and percentage of each cell type in pie plots (lower). D Dot plot showing that npas4l and gata1a are enriched in erythrocytes and platelets. E Representative images of RNAscope in situ hybridization with co-staining of npas4l and gata1a probes in adult zebrafish hearts at 1 dpa. Insets are high magnification of boxed areas. Arrowheads indicate npas4l + and gata1a + overlapped signals. Scale bars, 100 μm. F Quantitative RT-PCR of npas4l mRNA expression in FACS-sorted platelets ( CD41:eGFP ), erythrocytes ( gata1a:dsRed ), endothelial cells ( kdrl:eGFP ), cardiomyocytes ( myl7:cypher-eGFP ), epicardium ( tcf21:dsRed2 ), and immunocytes ( coro1a:eGFP ) at 1dpa. mRNA loading was normalized by rpl13a . n=3 replicates per group, and around 6000 cells pooled together pre replicate. Data are the mean ± SEM. G Quantitative RT-PCR of npas4l mRNA expression in FACS-sorted platelets ( CD41:eGFP ) at sham and 1dpa. mRNA loading was normalized by rpl13a . n=3 replicates per group, and around 6000 cells pooled together per replicate. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ***p<0.005; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. H Left: Representative fluorescence images of isolated platelets ( CD41:eGFP ) stained with Hochest33342. Scale bars, 10 μm. Right: Representative immunofluorescence images of CD41:eGFP co-stained with MHC and DAPI on zebrafish heart sections at 1 dpa. Scale bars, 20 μm. To determine the npas4l- expressing cell type, we sought npas4l- expressing cells in our single-cell data and found 207 cells that had npas4l transcripts. By plotting the cell ratio and expression level of npas4l , we observed a significant enrichment of npas4l expression in both platelets and erythrocytes, which are the same with gata1a -expressing cell type ( Figure 2D ). Although we noted weak npas4l expression in other cell types like fibroblasts and CMs, the expression levels or percentages were not comparable with those in platelets. To confirm the npas4l- expressing cell types, we also designed a RNAscope probe targeted against npas4l and applied it to whole-mount RNAscope in situ hybridization of 2-somite stage zebrafish embryos. The visualized signals mirrored the npas4l expression pattern reported previously ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ) (Figure S3A). By using this probe to perform RNAscope in situ hybridization on adult heart sections after injury, we found that the signal intensity of npas4l was nearly reduced by half in clo fv087b/+ hearts compared with wild-type sibling hearts at 1 dpa (Figure S3B). We further assessed the dynamic changes of npas4l upon heart injury, we found that a large amount of npas4l signals were detected in the infarct area at 3 dpa and the signals started to decrease subsequently (Figure S3C). We also checked npas4l expression window by performing quantitative RT-PCR of the whole ventricle after heart amputation. We found that npas4l showed an early response to injury, evident within 1 hour post amputation (1 hpa), peaking at 1 dpa, and subsequently declining thereafter (Figure S3D). All of these data suggested npas4l acted as an early player during heart regeneration, which temporally matched injury-triggered onset of thrombosis and its subsequent degradation. Then, by utilizing cell-type specific transgenic reporter lines, including Tg(CD41:eGFP) , Tg(gata1a: dsRed) , Tg(kdrl:eGFP) , Tg(myl7: cypher-eGFP) , Tg(tcf21: dsRed2) and Tg(coro1a:eGFP) , We harvested, dissociated, and FACS sorted cells from hearts at 1dpa, including platelets, erythrocytes, endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, epicardium, and immunocytes. RT-PCR analysis revealed a remarkable enrichment of npas4l expression in platelets, followed by erythrocytes, while hardly in endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, epicardium, and immunocytes ( Figure 2F ). By using RNAscope in situ hybridization on adult heart sections after injury, we found that, consistent with our single-cell data, npas4l signals shared a remarkable co-localization with gata1a , which labeled erythrocytes and platelets and were densely present within the blood clot area after injury ( Figure 2E ). Notably, at the wound site, npas4l was enriched in itga2b + platelets in close proximity to the edge of the border zone (Figure S4A). Furthermore, we found no evident co-localizations of npas4l with other heart cell markers, including postnb (fibroblasts), MHC (CMs), kdrl (ECs), coro1a (immunocytes), and tcf21 (epicardium) (Figures S4B-S4D), suggesting that npas4l expression was highly enriched in platelets and erythrocytes. When we compared npas4l expression in platelets before and after heart injury, we found dramatic induction of npas4l expression in platelets after heart injury ( Figure 2G ). Unlike mammals, teleost fishes including zebrafish preserved nucleated platelets and erythrocytes evolutionarily which made transcriptional regulation feasible ( Bronnimann et al., 2018 ; Liu et al., 2007 ). And we confirmed this platelet nucleation in zebrafish by co-localization of Tg(CD41:eGFP) platelets with nuclear indicators DAPI and Hochest33342 by immunostaining and fluorescent imaging ( Figure 2H ). Taken together, we established a single-cell atlas of regenerating adult zebrafish hearts and identified npas4l as an early regenerative factor derived from gata1a + blood cells, particularly platelets at the wound site. Platelets are essential for zebrafish heart regeneration To further address the critical role of platelets in zebrafish heart regeneration, we applied Tg(CD41:eGFP) transgenic reporter to label platelets, and found that platelets coagulated in the wound region neighboring the myocardium right after injury and diminished from 1 to 7 dpa ( Figure 3A ). Because amputation is associated with profuse bleeding, we investigated the functions of platelets beyond coagulation by examining regeneration following NTR-mediated genetic ablation of CMs ( Curado et al., 2007 ). Using Tg(myl7:ECFP-NTR) , in which NTR was overexpressed specifically in CMs, we first confirmed CMs ablation efficiency in this model by immunostaining (Figure S5A). Our CM ablation protocol revealed CMs were sufficiently damaged, showing weaker signal intensities of myosin heavy chain (CM cytoplasm marker) and myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2 (CM nuclei marker) along with a disrupted sarcomere structure labeled by α-Actinin after metronidazole treatment (Figure S5C). Importantly, we found that itga2b + platelets accumulated in the heart beginning at 3 days after induction of NTR with metronidazole treatment (dpt), peaked at 7 dpt, and returned to baseline levels by 14 dpt ( Figure 3B ). These injury-induced responses and recruitment of platelets implicated a potential regenerative role of platelets beyond their function in blood clotting. By using NTR-mediated CM ablation model, we also found that both Mef2 + /BrdU + CMs and Fli1 + /BrdU + ECs decreased in clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts at 7 dpt (Figure S5B and S5D), which is consistent with the data obtained from ventricular amputation model in zebrafish. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Injury-induced platelets are essential for heart regeneration. A Left, schematic of apex resection. Right, representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of CD41:eGFP (MHC immunofluorescence signal labels the myocardium) in zebrafish hearts from sham, and at 12 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days post amputation. n=6-9 hearts per group. Data are the mean ± SEM. Scale bars, 100 μm. B Left, schematic of genetic ablation of CMs using Tg(myl7:ECFP-NTR) transgenic zebrafish. Right, representative images of RNAscope in situ hybridization and quantification of itga2b + platelets in myl7:ECFP-NTR transgenic hearts in uninjured, and at 3 to 21 days post MTZ treatment (dpt). n=5-8 hearts per group. Data are the mean ± SEM. Scale bars, 100 μm. C, D Schematic diagram of experimental design to explore platelets function in Tg(CD41:ECFP-NTR) ( C ) and mpl smu3 ( D ). E Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of PCNA-positive CMs and ECs in wild-type sibling (n=13) and CD41:ECFP-NTR (n=14) transgenic hearts at 7 dpa. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ****p <0.001; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 50 μm. F Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of PCNA-positive CMs and ECs in wild-type sibling (n=11) and mpl smu3 (n=11) mutant hearts at 7 dpa. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; *p <0.05; ***p <0.005; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 50 μm. G Representative images and quantification of AFOG staining and MHC immunofluorescence of wild-type (n=51) and mpl smu3 (n=46) heart sections at 30 dpa. Data represents the percentage of each group; ***p <0.005; Pearson chi-square test. Scale bars, 100 μm. To directly address platelet function during heart regeneration, we investigated heart regeneration processes by depleting platelets by either NTR-mediated ablation of platelets or platelet-deficient mutant mpl smu3 ( Lin et al., 2017 ). Considering the fact that gata1a + blood cells consisted mostly of platelets in our single-cell data ( Figure 2D ), we generated Tg(gata1a:ECFP-NTR) zebrafish in which NTR was overexpressed in gata1a + blood cells. By using RNAscope in situ hybridization, we found that about half of itga2b + platelets were eliminated in Tg(gata1a:ECFP-NTR) hearts at 3 dpt (Figure S6A and S6B), and a notable decrease of both PCNA + /Mef2C + CMs and PCNA + /Fli1 + ECs in Tg(gata1a:ECFP-NTR) hearts at 7 dpa (Figure S6A and S6C). To achieve a more specific depletion of platelets, we also generated Tg(CD41:ECFP-NTR) zebrafish, in which NTR was overexpressed in CD41 + platelets. By using RNAscope in situ hybridization to validate platelet ablation efficiency, we found that nearly all itga2b + platelets were eliminated in Tg(CD41:ECFP-NTR) hearts at 3 dpa ( Figures 3C and S7A), and consistent with the phenotype observed in Tg(gata1a:ECFP-NTR) hearts, we found a notable decrease of both PCNA + /Mef2 + CMs and PCNA + /Fli1 + ECs in Tg(CD41:ECFP-NTR) hearts at 7 dpa ( Figures 3C and 3E ). Additionally, by using a platelet-deficient mpl smu3 mutant, in which >90% of platelets were depleted in early embryos ( Lin et al., 2017 ), we also found few itga2b + platelets in the infarct area of mutant hearts after ventricular resection (Figure S7B). Consistent with the NTR-based deletion of platelets above, we found that both BrdU and PCNA labeled proliferative CMs and ECs decreased in mpl smu3 mutant hearts at 7 dpa ( Figures 3D , 3F and S7C). Moreover, AFOG and MHC immunofluorescence staining data showed larger scars consisting of fibrin and collagen and less myocardial regeneration in mutant hearts compared with wild-type sibling hearts at 30 dpa ( Figures 3G ). To further assess whether npas4l influenced the formation of platelets, we quantified and found no difference on the numbers of Tg(CD41:eGFP) -labeled platelets between clo fv087b/+ and wild-type hearts at 1dpa (Figure S8A). Furthermore, we overexpressed npas4l (Npas4l OE) in gata1a -positive cells by utilizing the Tg(ubi:loxp-eGFP-stop-loxp-npas4l) [designated Tg(ubi-npas4l) ] and Tg(gata1a:Cre-ERT2) double transgenic fish lines. By utilizing RNAscope in situ hybridization with cre and gata1a probes, we confirmed cre was specifically expressed in gata1a + erythrocytes after heart injury (Figure S8B). Following 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT) treatment, we extracted and isolated total RNA of gata1a + platelets/erythrocytes or the whole ventricles from Tg(ubi-Npas4l) control and Npas4l OE hearts at 3- or 7-days post 4-HT treatment. Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that the levels of npas4l mRNA increased in both ventricles and isolated platelets/erythrocytes in Npas4l OE hearts, indicating npas4l was successfully overexpressed in platelets/erythrocytes (Figure S8C). By using RNAscope in situ hybridization with itga2b probes, we found overexpression of npas4l had no evident effect on the numbers of itga2b + platelets in Npas4l OE hearts compared to Tg(ubi-npas4l) control hearts at 7 dpt (Figure S8D). Together, these data supported that Npas4l is essential for injury-induced platelet activation and function during zebrafish heart regeneration, but is not critical for formation and recruitment of platelets in the injured hearts. Npas4l regulates a platelet ligand network program to modulate cell-cell interactions To address how Npas4l in platelets regulates heart regeneration, we revisited our scRNA-seq datasets and focused on ligand-receptor activity among different heart cell types. By plotting the ligand expression of each cluster identified in zebrafish hearts, we found that more ligands were expressed in platelets, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages, suggesting that these cells were actively secretory ( Figure 4A ). We noted several genes reported to be connected with heart regeneration as expressed in platelets, including vegfc ( El-Sammak et al., 2022 ), Serpine1 ( Munch et al., 2017 ), and bmp6 . Bmp6 has been described to function downstream of Tbx20, mediating EC proliferation ( Fang et al., 2020 ). By comparing the numbers of ligand-receptor pairs in each cluster between wild-type and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts during regeneration, we found an evident decrease in ligand-receptor pairs in clo fv087b/+ hearts, indicating the weaker cell-cell interactions and signal transduction in the mutant hearts ( Figure 4B ). As for platelet interactions with other cells, since we did not detect any significant quantitative changes of ligand-receptor pairs between wild-type siblings and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts, we switched our focus to the ligand-receptor activities in platelets that mediated interactions with CMs and ECs. By sub-clustering platelets, CMs, and ECs, we obtained 6 subsets of platelets, 11 subsets of CMs, and 7 subsets of ECs (Figures S9-S11 and Tables S2-S4). In addition, we found dynamic changes in these subsets in clo fv087b/+ hearts at 3 dpa and 7 dpa (Figures S9C, S10C and S11C). Importantly, by plotting the ligand-receptor expression of each subcluster, we noted 3 highly expressed ligand-receptor pairs in platelet-CM interactions including HBEGF-EGFR, BMP6-BMPR1A-ACTR2A, and BMP6-BMPR1A-BMPR2, which mainly targeted CM3 and CM9 by all 6 platelet subsets ( Figure 4C ). And we measured a decrease of the CM3 and CM9 ratio in clo fv087b/+ hearts at 3 dpa and 7 dpa (Figure S9C). By analyzing their characteristics and cellular functions, we found that CM3 (marked by myh10 ) and CM9 (marked by myh6 ) were enriched with pathways related to cardiac muscle cell differentiation and proliferation, indicating that these subsets represent potential proliferative CMs (Figures S9D-S9F and Table S2). Notably, “Transforming growth factor beta1 production” and “Regulation of Smad protein complex assembly” were also included in CM9, suggesting that CM9 is enriched in Bmp6-mediated TGF-beta signals. In line with platelet-CM interactions, we noted 3 highly expressed ligand-receptor pairs in platelet-EC interactions including VEGFC-KDR, VEGFC-FLT4. and HBEGF-EGFR, which mainly targeted EC2 and EC7 ( Figure 4D ). Consistent with this, we observed a decrease of both EC2 and EC7 ratio in clo fv087b/+ hearts at 3 dpa and 7 dpa (Figure S10C). Analysis of the characteristics and cellular functions of both groups demonstrated that EC2 (marked by plvapb ) and EC7 (marked by cxcl12a ) were enriched in vascular EC proliferation or migration (Figures S10D-S10F and Table S3). Furthermore, we noted pathways enriched in EC7 like “Lympho-angiogenesis” and “Regulation of retinoic acid receptor signaling pathway”, which have been reported to participate in angiogenesis and heart regeneration. Both clues suggested that EC2 and EC7 were potential proliferative EC subsets. Together, our scRNA-seq revealed platelets, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages as major secretory cell clusters, and Bmp6, Hbegf, and Vegfc as key platelet ligands in mediating platelet interactions with CMs and ECs. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Npas4l regulates a platelet ligand network program to modulate cell-cell interactions. A Dot plot showing ligand expression in each cell type of the zebrafish heart. The inset is high magnification of the boxed area highlighting platelet-enriched ligands. B Heatmap depicting the numbers of ligand-receptor pairs among cell clusters in wild-type and clo fv087b/+ hearts during regeneration. C, D Dot plot showing significant ligand-receptor activity (P <0.05) between platelet-CM ( C ) and platelet-EC ( D ). E Flowchart of Npas4l-HA ChIP-seq by CUT&TAG during heart regeneration. F Pie plots showing Npas4l protein binding peaks distribution on the genome scale, of which the promoter is defined within ±5kb (left) or ±10 kb (right) to TSS. G Venn diagram of platelet-enriched ligands with Npas4l-regulated ligands. H Heatmap presenting the expression of Npas4l-regulated ligands in gata1a + platelets/erythrocytes between Npas4l OE and control hearts at 7 dpt. n=2 replicates per group, and around 6000 cells pooled together per replicate. I Gene ontology analysis showing pathways directly regulated by Npas4l. J Motif enrichment presenting preference of Npas4l binding sequences. Since Npas4l is a classic basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor and only one report identified its direct binding targets during zebrafish embryogenesis ( Marass et al., 2019 ), we decided to assess its targets during heart regeneration. By generating a transgenic line overexpressing HA tagged Npas4l (Npas4l-HA OE) consisting of Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-Npas4l-HA) and Tg(gata1a:Cre-ERT2) , we harvested 1-dpa hearts, isolated the platelets/erythrocytes, and performed the high-sensitive ChIP-seq with CUT&TAG method using anti-HA antibody ( Figure 4E ). By comparing Npas4l-HA OE hearts with Tg(gata1a:Cre-ERT2) control hearts, we got npas4l -specific binding peaks. To calculate their regional proportion on the whole genome scale, we chose two ranges to define promoter regions, a narrow range (±5kb to TSS) and a broad range (±10kb to TSS). The distribution pie plot revealed that promoter, first intron, and distal intergenic regions were dominantly anchored by npas4l binding peaks ( Figure 4F ). Moreover, among all the platelet-specific ligands, npas4l showed promoter binding activities on most of these genes, and some of them including bmp6 , vegfc , hbegfb , serpine1 , tfpia , hmgb1a , apln , and tln1 were included in a narrow range of promoter-regulated gene scale ( Figure 4G ). To further confirm Npas4l regulation on these genes expression, we isolated gata1a + platelets/erythrocytes from Npas4l OE and control hearts after 7 days post 4-HT treatment (7dpt) and analyzed the transcriptome by RNA-sequencing. Notably, we found a fully upregulated RNA expression of these ligand genes, indicating that npas4l directly bound their promoters and regulated their transcription levels ( Figure 4H and Table S7). The gene ontology analysis of npas4l binding peaks revealed that, in addition to well-known biological process like “hemopoiesis” and “hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation”, npas4l also regulated many pathways related to cell communication, signal transduction, growth factor activity, and tissue regeneration, which correlated well with the conclusion above that platelet npas4l directly regulated ligands expression to mediated cell-cell interactions with CMs and ECs ( Figure 4I and Table S5). Furthermore, by motif analysis of Npas4l binding peaks, we noticed a significant HIF1α consensus sequence along with other pluripotent genes recognition motifs, including Oct4, c-Myc and Gata6 ( Figure 4J ). On top of these motifs, the tumor-related protein p73 and p53 recognition motifs lied up, which suggested npas4l might synergistically cooperate with these proteins to regulate their target genes ( Figure 4J ). But this hypothesis warrants further investigations in the future. Taken together, our data suggest that Npas4l directly regulates a platelet ligand network program to coordinate cell-cell interactions during heart regeneration. Platelet Npas4l regulates BMP6 signaling for CM proliferation and regeneration Since we found that neither loss-of-function nor gain-of-function of npas4l affects the platelet numbers and responses to injury (Figure S8A and S8D), we then asked how loss-of-function and gain-of-function of npas4l affects platelet transcriptomic profiling. By sorting out CD41 + platelets from wild type siblings and clo fv087b/+ mutants, we performed bulk RNA-sequencing, compared the transcriptomic changes with RNA-seq data of Npas4l OE hearts mentioned above, and identified Npas4l-regulated genes and pathways. We discovered 1626 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between wild-type siblings and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts at 1 dpa, and 1874 DEGs between control and Npas4l OE hearts at 7 dpt, of which 269 genes were shared by both cases ( Figure 5A and Table S7). By categorizing these genes based on expression changes dependent on npas4l , we identified two groups of genes that were assigned as Npas4l-positively or -negatively regulated genes ( Figure 5B ). Notably, we found that bmp6 along with other TGF-beta superfamily members like rock1 , bambib , and tgfb1b were all included in the Npas4l-positively regulated genes. Analysis of pathways and biological processes also noted that the TGF-beta signaling pathway was significantly enriched in Npas4l-positively regulated pathways ( Figures 5C , S12 and Table S7). Moreover, genome browsing of npas4l binding peaks and read counts near bmp6 transcription start site, we observed significant enriched peaks located within the promoter and first intron of two bmp6 transcripts, indicating of npas4l direct binding and regulation ( Figure 5E ). Since bmp6 was found to be one of the key platelet ligands mediating crosstalk between platelets and CMs ( Figure 4C ), these data suggested bmp6 as a potential downstream effector of Npas4l. We then examined the bmp6 expression pattern after injury and found that injury triggered bmp6 elevation from 1 dpa to 7 dpa, and in the infarct area, bmp6 expression was restricted to itga2b + platelets only; while in the border and remote zones, we also found bmp6 expression in ECs ( Figures 5D , S13 and S14A), which was consistent with a previous report ( Fang et al., 2020 ). To further validate Npas4l regulation of bmp6 , we assessed the expression levels of bmp6 and other platelet ligand mRNAs in platelets between wild-type siblings and clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts at 1 dpa. We found an evident reduction of bmp6 , tfpia , thbs1b , and vegfc mRNA expression and a slight increase of apln mRNA expression in clo fv087b/+ hearts ( Figure 5F ). In platelets/erythrocytes from Npas4l OE hearts at 7 dpt, we found a consistent increased expression of these platelet ligand mRNAs in which bmp6 expression had the most striking induction ( Figure 5G ), emphasizing the Npas4l regulation of bmp6 . In addition, we discovered that Bmp6 protein expression was reduced in clo fv087b/+ hearts at 3 dpa by western blots ( Figure 5H ). RNAscope in situ hybridization of bmp6 revealed a remarkable increase of the bmp6 signal in Npas4l OE hearts compared with control hearts at 7 dpt ( Figure 5I ). All these data together supported the conclusion that platelet bmp6 was positively regulated by Npas4l. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Platelet Npas4l regulates BMP6 signaling for CM proliferation and regeneration. A Venn diagram of bulk RNA-seq data showing the overlap of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from CD41 + cells (wild-type sibling vs clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts at 1 dpa, n=3 replicates per group, around 6000 cells pooled together per replicate) and gata1a + cells (control sibling vs Npas4l OE hearts at 7 dpt, n=2 replicates per group, around 6000 cells pooled together per replicate). Fold change >1.4; p-value adjusted (p adj ) <0.05. B Heatmap showing up-regulated genes (red) and down-regulated genes (blue) by Npas4l from the overlapped DEGs in panel A. C Pathway analysis showing enriched terms of Npas4l positively-regulated genes. The arrowhead indicates the BMP6-related TGF-beta signaling pathway. D Representative images of RNAscope in situ hybridization using bmp6 probe co-stained with itga2b probe in zebrafish hearts at 2 dpa. The inset is high magnification of the boxed area. Dashed lines delineate the wound edge. Scale bar, 100 μm. E Browser tracks proximal to bmp6 transcription start site, indicating anti-HA CUT&TAG enriched read counts and Npas4l binding peaks of isolated platelets/erythrocytes from Npas4l-HA OE and control hearts at 1 dpa. F, G Quantitative RT-PCR of platelet ligands mRNA expression normalized by rpl13a in CD41-positive cells (wild type vs clo fv087b/+ hearts at 1 dpa, F ) and gata1a-positive cells (control vs Npas4l OE hearts at 7 dpt, G ) from zebrafish hearts. One of three independent experiments is presented, n=3 replicates per group, around 6000 cells pooled together per replicate. Data are the mean ± SEM.; *p <0.05; *p <0.01; ****p <0.001; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. H Western blot and quantification of Bmp6 expression in wild-type and clo fv087b/+ hearts at 1 dpa. n=3 replicates per group, 10 hearts pooled together per replicate. β- Actin serves as loading control. Data are the mean ± SEM.; *p <0.05; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. I Representative images of RNAscope in situ hybridization and quantification of bmp6 in control (n=13) and Npas4l OE (n=9) hearts at 7 dpt. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ***p <0.005; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 100 μm. J Schematic diagram of experimental design to explore whether bmp6 over-expression rescues clo fv087b/+ phenotype. K Representative immunofluorescence images of PCNA-positive CMs and ECs in hsp70:Cre-ERT2 (control, n=14), hsp70:Cre-ERT2; clo fv087b/+ ( clo fv087b/+ , n=7), and clo fv087b/+ ; hsp70:Cre-ERT2; ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-bmp6 ( clo fv087b/+ , Bmp6 OE) (n=7) hearts at 7 dpa. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; ***p <0.005; ****p <0.001; one-way ANOVA with LSD test. Scale bars, 50 μm. To further explore Bmp6 function in heart regeneration, we applied CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology to generate a bmp6 mutant line, of which 1.6kb sequence between exon3 and exon4 was deleted, resulting in a frame shift and pre-terminated protein translation (Figure S14B). Western blot and quantitative RT-PCR results revealed that both mRNA and protein expression of bmp6 was significantly downregulated in bmp6 mutant, while other major BMP ligands mRNA including bmp2a , bmp2b , bmp7a and bmp7b remained unaffected (Figure S14C-S14E). Importantly, by comparing with wild type hearts, bmp6 mutant hearts exhibited a remarkable decrease of BrdU-positive CMs but not ECs at 7 dpa (Figure S14F). Besides, we generated a bmp6 over-expression line (Bmp6 OE) consisting of Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-bmp6) and Tg(hsp70:Cre-ERT2) and asked whether bmp6 over-expression rescued clo fv087b/+ mutant phenotype. Following heat shock and 4-HT treatment, we observed bmp6 over-expression significantly rescued PCNA-positive CMs index in clo fv087b/+ mutant hearts at 7 dpa but had no effects on PCNA-positive ECs ( Figure 5J and K ). Altogether, these data suggested that Bmp6 acts downstream to Npas4l in platelets to regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation. Platelet Npas4l is both necessary and sufficient for heart regeneration Since we identified npas4l as a platelet-derived regulator of cardiomyocyte proliferation, we asked whether over-expression of npas4l in platelets was sufficient to promote quiescent CMs to enter the cell cycle. The immunofluorescence on uninjured heart sections showed that over-expression of npas4l in gata1a + platelets caused significant induction of proliferative CMs and ECs in Npas4l OE hearts at 7 days after 4-HT treatment (dpt) (Figures S15A and S15D). By crossing the Npas4l OE line with clo fv087b/+ , we found that the percentages of BrdU + proliferative CMs and ECs decreased in clo fv087b/+ hearts compared with wild-type control hearts, and this was rescued by overexpression of npas4l in clo fv087b/+ ; Npas4l OE hearts at 7 dpa (Figures S15B and S15E). Furthermore, we generated a platelet-specific npas4l over-expression line (Pla Npas4l OE) consisting of Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-Npas4l-HA) and Tg(CD41:Cre-ERT2) . RNAscope in situ hybridization with cre and itga2b probes showed that cre was specifically expressed in itga2b + platelets after injury (Figure S16). By crossing the Pla Npas4l OE line with clo fv087b/+ , we asked whether platelet-specific npas4l over-expression rescued CM proliferation defects in clo fv087b/+ mutant, or even reinforced the CM proliferation intensity in uninjured wild-type hearts. Following the 4-HT bathing and apex amputation, we found an evident restore of CM and EC proliferation index nearly to the control level in clo fv087b/+ hearts after npas4l over-expression in platelets at 7 dpa ( Figures 6A - 6C ). More importantly, over-expression of npas4l in platelets strengthened the proliferation capacities of CMs and ECs after heart injury compared with the control hearts, indicating platelet npas4l was potent to trigger the cycling in zebrafish heart regeneration ( Figures 6A - 6C ). Taking a step further, we applied Pla Npas4l OE consisting of Tg(ubi:loxp-GFP-stop-loxp-Npas4l) and Tg(CD41:Cre-ERT2) to ask whether over-expression of npas4l in platelets was sufficient to promote quiescent CMs and ECs to enter the cell-cycle. Strikingly, over-expression of npas4l in platelets showed significant induction of proliferative CMs in both compact layer and trabecular layer at 7 days post 4-HT treatment (dpt) ( Figures 6A and 6D ). On the outer layer of the ventricle, we also found increased cycling activities of coronary endothelial cells in Pla Npas4l OE hearts at 7 dpt, indicating over-expression of npas4l in platelets also promoted angiogenesis in zebrafish hearts ( Figures 6A and 6D ). Since bmp6 functioned downstream of npas4l , we asked whether Bmp6 signaling played a role in promoting quiescent CMs and ECs into the cell-cycle. By injecting the BMP signaling inhibitors K02288 or LDN193189 into control and Npas4l OE hearts, we found that inhibition of BMP signaling partially ablated PCNA + CMs in Npas4l OE hearts (Figure S15F). As for ECs, we found that BMP inhibitors caused a slight reduction in EC proliferation index but this failed to reach statistical significance. In addition, by genetically overexpressing bmp6 in zebrafish hearts, we found no effects on promoting quiescent CM and EC cycling (Figure S17), indicating that although bmp6 contributed to npas4l -induced cardiomyocyte cycling, other Npas4l-regulated factors are required for inducing cardiomyocyte proliferation and regeneration. Together, these results suggested that platelet npas4l is required and sufficient for promoting CM and EC proliferation and heart regeneration. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Platelet npas4l is required and sufficient for CM and EC proliferation. A Schematic diagram of experimental design to explore the function of platelet npas4l over-expression. B, C Representative immunofluorescence images ( B ) and quantification ( C ) of PCNA-positive CMs and ECs in CD41:Cre-ERT2 (control, n=9), CD41:Cre-ERT2; ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-npas4l-HA (Pla Npas4l OE, n=7), CD41:Cre-ERT2; clo fv087b/+ ( clo fv087b/+ , n=7) and CD41:Cre-ERT2; ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-npas4l-HA; clo fv087b/+ ( clo fv087b/+ , Pla Npas4l OE, n=10) hearts at 7 dpa after 4-HT treatment. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; *p <0.05; **p<0.01; ****p <0.001; one-way ANOVA with LSD test. Scale bars, 50 μm. D Representative immunofluorescence images and quantification of PCNA-positive CMs and ECs in CD41:Cre-ERT2 (control, n=11) and CD41:Cre-ERT2; ubi:loxp-eGFP-stop-loxp-npas4l (Pla Npas4l OE, n=14) hearts (uninjured) at 7 days post 4-HT treatment. Insets are high magnification of boxed areas. Arrowheads indicate proliferating CMs or ECs. Data are the mean ± SEM.; **p <0.01; ****p<0.001; unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Scale bars, 200 μm. Discussion Novel Npas4l function in heart regeneration Npas4l is well-known as being the earliest transcription factor for the specification of endothelial and hematopoietic lineages during zebrafish embryogenesis ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ; Stainier et al., 1995 ). Previous research has established its critical function in determining endothelial and hematopoietic cell identity, and have identified its target genes during vascular development ( Capon et al., 2022 ; Marass et al., 2019 ; Mattonet et al., 2022 ). However, its function in adult organ regeneration has never been addressed. In this work, we present, for the first time, Npas4l function in zebrafish heart regeneration as a platelet transcription factor that is required and sufficient for CM proliferation and regeneration. Haploinsufficiency of npas4l disrupted heart regeneration and impaired the injury-induced proliferation of CMs and ECs. Interestingly, being quite different from its expression pattern in zebrafish embryos, we found that npas4l was enriched in gata1a + blood cells, particularly itga2b + platelets in adult hearts, without being evident expression in endothelial cells. This striking expression difference between embryos and adult hearts suggested that Npas4l may function through different mechanisms during heart regeneration. It is well understood that cardiomyogenic factors like Neuregulin1 (Nrg1), YAP, miRNA-199a-3p, and Klf1, as well as the small molecular cocktail 5SM are sufficient to promote quiescent CMs into the cell-cycle and division in zebrafish and mouse heart regeneration ( Bersell et al., 2009 ; Du et al., 2022 ; Eulalio et al., 2012 ; Gemberling et al., 2015 ; Monroe et al., 2019 ; Ogawa et al., 2021 ). Similarly, overexpression of npas4l in platelets, driven by either platelet-specific CD41 or erythrocyte/platelet-specific gata1a promoter, promoted CM and EC proliferation in either uninjured or injured adult zebrafish hearts, thus revealing the first platelet signaling for inducing the proliferation of CMs and ECs in zebrafish or any animal systems. While this study focuses on the function of Npas4l in platelets, its potential role in erythrocytes cannot be entirely ruled out. Our scRNA-seq data showed that npas4l expression overlaps well with gata1a expression; this was in most of the platelets and a small part of erythrocytes revealed by quantitative RT-qPCR results. And we noted no evident ligand expression and interaction of erythrocytes with CMs and ECs, further supporting the conclusion that Npas4l function in platelets rather than erythrocytes. Most importantly, platelet-specific overexpression of npas4l driven by CD41 promoter, like the gata1a promoter, was able to rescue regenerative defects in cloche mutant hearts as well as was sufficient to promote quiescent CMs into the cell-cycle. Together, this work presents the first evidence that npas4l, as a platelet factor, is required and sufficient for zebrafish heart regeneration. scRNA-seq data cover major cell types present in regenerating zebrafish hearts By constructing a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of zebrafish heart regeneration, we acquired >60,000 cells covering the major cardiac cell types. Around half of these cells were CMs, presenting much more comprehensive coverage of CMs than previous reports and thus providing a rich source to address CM heterogeneity during heart regeneration ( Honkoop et al., 2019 ; Ma et al., 2021 ). And we clustered CMs into 11 subsets and obtained some clues about CM3 and CM9, which were potential proliferative CM subgroups regulated by platelet Npas4l signaling. Similarly, we identified EC2 and EC7 as proliferative EC subgroups modulated by platelet Npas4l. By the global analysis of the ligand expression in cell populations, we noted that platelets, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages were the most secretory populations in cell-cell communications. Importantly, these cell-cell signaling transductions in cloche heterozygote mutants were prominently reduced during heart regeneration, and Npas4l regulated the expression of a cluster of ligands in platelets to achieve platelet interactions with other cell types during heart regeneration. Thus, this comprehensive scRNA-seq analysis of adult hearts results in the discovery of platelet npas4l function in heart regeneration and provides the field a rich resource for addressing cell-cell interactions and related signaling pathways during heart regeneration. Novel platelet function in heart regeneration Platelets are derived from megakaryocytes, which are small and lack nuclei in mammals. For a long time, platelets were thought to modulate the inflammatory environment for tissue repair ( Mezger et al., 2019 ). A recent study suggested that platelet activation regulates the infarct size in the heart and brain by ischemia-reperfusion injury ( Rohlfing et al., 2022 ). In this work, we discovered a pro-regenerative function of platelets during zebrafish heart regeneration. Decreasing platelets by either NTR-based deletion or mpl mutants severely impaired zebrafish heart regeneration. Interestingly, a dynamic response of platelets to heart injury occurred even in a non-bleeding heart injury model by NTR-based cardiomyocyte ablation, thus suggesting that platelet activation not only serves for bleeding-arrest but also has a pro-regenerative function. For platelet activation mechanisms, our cell-cell interaction analysis revealed no thrombopoietin (THPO)/THPO receptor (MPL) expression from scRNA-seq data, while we noted an evident erythropoietin (EPO)/EPO receptor (EPOR) expression between platelets and CMs or ECs. This clue indicates that after heart injury, the EPO-EPOR pathway is preferred for activating thrombocytopoiesis ( Lin et al., 2022 ). In this case, injured CMs and/or ECs release EPO that interacts with EPOR-expressing platelets, thus achieving platelet recruitment to the injury site for heart regeneration. This may explain the dynamic platelet response to heart injury. On the other hand, we noted significant expression of the ligands HBEGF, BMP6, and VEGFC in platelets that interacted with CMs and/or ECs. Except for VEGFC, which is well known for coronary vessel regeneration ( El-Sammak et al., 2022 ), much remains unknown about how HBEGF and BMP6 function during heart regeneration. HBEGF is broadly expressed in various organs, and is reported to have a protective function in liver and diabetic wounds ( Johnson and Wang, 2015 ; Takemura et al., 2013 ). During tissue repair and regeneration, HBEGF promotes cellular proliferation, migration, adhesion, and differentiation ( Dao et al., 2018 ). And therapeutic delivery of HBEGF accelerates cutaneous wound healing ( Johnson and Wang, 2013 ). Together with the data in this work, the above results suggest that HBEGF may also have pro-regenerative effects on zebrafish heart regeneration. BMP6 is a key regulator in iron homeostasis and bone formation in development. And endocardial BMP6 has been reported to influence cardiac EC proliferation during zebrafish heart regeneration ( Fang et al., 2020 ). In this study, we report that platelet BMP6 acts downstream of Npas4l to mediate platelet-CM interactions during heart regeneration. Over-expression of BMP6 rescued impaired CM proliferation in clo fv087b/+ hearts after injury, indicating that platelet BMP6 is required for CM proliferation. Other signals mediating Npas4l-induced CM and EC proliferation need to be further investigated. Together, our data support the hypothesis that platelets house various pro-regenerative secretory factors essential for heart regeneration, and platelet BMP6 is the downstream effector of Npas4l for fine-tuning CM proliferation and regeneration. Limitations of the Study In this study, to explore the potential of npas4l in inducing mature cardiomyocytes into the cell-cycle, we ectopically overexpressed npas4l in erythrocytes/platelets in uninjured hearts, and found the increased numbers of PCNA + cardiomyocytes after Npas4l overexpression, which were visualized by co-staining with cardiomyocyte marker Mef2. In addition, overexpressed npas4l in erythrocytes/platelets also promoted newly-formed coronary vessels and endothelial cell proliferation. However, the proliferation index showed a 1%-2% increase in Npas4l OE hearts compared with control hearts by using the proliferative CM or EC numbers to divide the total CM or EC numbers on the whole ventricle. These data thus suggested the effect of Npas4l on CM and EC proliferation might be small in uninjured hearts; on the other hand, due to the relatively low efficiency of npas4l overexpression, we only detected a 0.5-fold induction of npas4l mRNA no matter in the whole ventricles or isolated erythrocytes/platelets, which might account for small effect of Npas4l on CM or EC proliferation. Therefore, our data suggests a role of npas4l in inducing quiescent CM/EC into cell-cycle, but future studies are needed to thoroughly decipher the competence and mechanisms of npas4l on promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation in uninjured hearts. Furthermore, this work is restricted to study npas4l function in zebrafish heart regeneration, and it will be important to address whether it also play a conservative role in mammalian heart regeneration in the future. Author contributions JH and CX designed and performed most of the experiments, and analyzed data; JH wrote the manuscript and CX contributed to revising the manuscript. YS designed the experiments on scRNA-seq, bulk RNA-seq and CUT&TAG, performed bioinformatics analysis of the data, and contributed to writing the manuscript. JS and YH contributed to performing scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq experiments and data analysis. YS and XM contributed to generating bmp6 mutant and several transgenic zebrafish lines. QZ, SQ, and YX contributed to developing a protocol for dissociating zebrafish cardiac cells. YGC, XZ and JW supervised this work, designed experiments, analyzed data, and contributed to revising the manuscript. JWX conceived and supervised this work, designed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare no competing financial interests. RESOURCE AVAILABILITY Lead contact Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Jing-Wei Xiong, Ph.D. (jingwei_xiong{at}pku.edu.cn) Materials availability All unique/stable reagents generated in this study are available from the lead contact with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement. Data and code availability Sequencing data that support the findings of this study were deposited into the GEO with the accession code GSE224125. Only public software and custom code were used to generate or process datasets in this work. The software version, references, and parameters are listed in the Key Resources Table and Method Details. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request. EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS Zebrafish lines and maintenance All zebrafish in this study were raised and handled according to a zebrafish protocol (IMM-XiongJW-3) approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Peking University, which is fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. Wild-type, mutant, and transgenic zebrafish of the outbred Tuebingen and AB strains of both males and females (4 to 10 months old) were used in this study. The transgenic and mutant zebrafish lines used were as follows: clo m39/+ ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ), clo fv087b/+ ( Xiong et al., 2008 ), bmp6 pku422 , Tg(CD41:ECFP-NTR) pku414 , Tg(gata1a:Cre-ERT2) pku391 , Tg(CD41:Cre-ERT2) pku417 , Tg(ubi:loxp-eGFP-stop-loxp-npas4l) pku394 , Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-npas4l-HA) pku419 , Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-bmp6) pku420 , Tg(myl7:ECFP-NTR) pku360 ( Han et al., 2014 ), Tg(coro1a:eGFP) hkz04t ( Li and Hu, 2012 ), Tg(gata1a:dsRed) sd2 ( Traver et al., 2003 ), Tg(CD41:eGFP) la2 ( Lin et al., 2005 ), Tg(kdrl:eGFP) s843 ( Jin et al., 2005 ), Tg(myl7:cypher-eGFP) pku365 ( Xiao et al., 2016 ), Tg(tcf21:dsRed2) pd37 ( Kikuchi et al., 2011 ), Tg(myl7:nucDsRed) zf3348 ( Xie et al., 2020 ), and Tg(gata4:eGFP) ae1 ( Heicklen-Klein and Evans, 2004 ). The mutant zebrafish mpl smu3 ( Lin et al., 2017 ) were kindly provided by Dr. Yiyue Zhang. Zebrafish were housed at a density of <4 fish per liter. Water temperature was maintained at 28 °C. Ventricular resection was performed as described previously ( Poss et al., 2002 ). Cell lines HEK293T cell line (ATCC, SCSP-502) was cultured in DMEM (Cytiva, SH30022.01) with 10% fetal bone serum (Yeason, 40130ES76) and Penicillin-Streptomycin-Gentamicin Solution (Solarbio, P1410) at 37° C in a 5% CO 2 humidified incubator. METHOD DETAILS Drug treatment For metronidazole-mediated ablation of CMs, adult zebrafish were bathed in 1 mM metronidazole (Sigma, M1547) for 7 days before washout. For metronidazole-mediated ablation of platelets, adult zebrafish were bathed in 1 mM metronidazole the day before heart amputation. After heart injury, the zebrafish were bathed in 1mM metronidazole daily before harvesting the hearts. For 4-hydroxytamoxifen-mediated npas4l overexpression, adult zebrafish were bathed in 5 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma, H7904) for 10-12 h before washout. This cycle was repeated daily for total three times. For bmp6 overexpression, the adult zebrafish received a heat shock in 39 °C water for 30 min. After cooling down to room temperature for 1 h, the zebrafish were bathed in 5 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen for 10-12 h before washout. This cycle was repeated daily for total three times. All the zebrafish were maintained at a density of 4 zebrafish per 150 ml water for drug bathing. For BrdU tracing assays, BrdU (Sigma, B5002) was dissolved in DMSO to make a 100 mM stock solution. Adult zebrafish were anesthetized in E3 medium containing 0.4% tricaine and injected intrapericardially with 20 μl BrdU (8 mM in PBS) daily for three days before harvesting hearts. For BMP inhibitor treatment, LDN-193189 (MCE, HY-12071) and K02288 (MCE, HY-12278) were dissolved in DMSO to make 10 mM stock solutions. Adult zebrafish were anesthetized in E3 medium containing 0.4% tricaine and injected intrapericardially with 20 μl LDN-193189 (50 μM in PBS), K02288 (50 μM in PBS) or vehicle (0.5% DMSO in PBS) daily for three days before harvesting hearts. Generation of Tg(CD41:ECFP-NTR) pku414 , Tg(CD41:Cre-ERT2) pku417 , Tg(gata1a:Cre-ERT2) pku391 , Tg(ubi:loxp-eGFP-stop-loxp-npas4l) pku394 , Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-npas4l-HA) pku419 , and Tg(ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-bmp6) pku420 transgenic zebrafish lines CD41:ECFP-NTR was generated by replacing the dsRed sequence from CD41:dsRed construct which contains a 6-kb CD41 promoter sequence, with the ECFP-NTR sequence. The CD41:dsRed construct was a gift from Dr. Wenqing Zhang, and the ECFP-NTR sequence was kindly provided by Dr. Ling-Fei Luo ( Curado et al., 2007 ). CD41:Cre-ERT2 was generated by replacing the ECFP-NTR sequence from the CD41:ECFP-NTR construct with the Cre-ERT2 sequence. gata1a:Cre-ERT2 was generated by replacing the GFP sequence from Gata1-GM2 vector which contains an 8.1-kb gata1a promoter sequence, with the Cre-ERT2 sequence. The Gata1-GM2 vector was a gift from Dr. Shuo Lin ( Long et al., 1997 ). The Cre-ERT2 sequence was PCR-amplified from myl7:Cre-ERT2 plasmid ( Xiao et al., 2016 ). ubi:loxp-eGFP-stop-loxp-npas4l was generated by modifying the ubi:loxp-DsRed-stop-loxp-eGFP construct. which was kindly provided by Dr. C. Geoffrey Burns ( Mosimann et al., 2011 ). The DsRed and e GFP sequences were replaced by eGFP and npas4l coding sequences, respectively. The eGFP sequence was PCR-amplified from ubi:loxp-DsRed-stop-loxp-eGFP plasmid and the npas4l coding sequence was synthesized by Beijing Ruiboxingke Biotechnology Co. according to the published sequence ( Reischauer et al., 2016 ). ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-npas4l-HA was generated by modifying ubi:loxp-eGFP-stop-loxp-npas4l plasmid. The eGFP and npas4l sequences were replaced by 9 repeats of polyA signal and 6 repeats of HA tagged npas4l sequences, respectively. ubi:loxp-stop-loxp-bmp6 was generated by replacing npas4l-HA sequence with bmp6 coding sequence. The bmp6 coding sequence was PCR-amplified from cDNA extracted from 24-hpf embryos. Each of the above entire cassettes was cloned into the Tol2 backbone and co-injected with transposase mRNA into one-cell stage embryos for making transgenic zebrafish ( Kawakami et al., 2004 ). Generation of bmp6 pku422 mutant zebrafish line The bmp6 pku422 zebrafish line was generated by using CRISPR/Cas9 technology with the following guide RNA sequences (5’-3’, PAM sequences in bold): GGGAGCTGAGCAGGGTTGGC TGG (exon 3 of bmp6 ) and GGCGTTGTTTGCCTGTAGAC CGG (exon 4 of bmp6 ). The protocol was described previously ( Chang et al., 2013 ). In brief, Cas9 mRNA (300 ng/μl) and gRNA (20ng/μl each) were co-injected into one-cell stage, wild-type embryos. The embryos were raised up and PCR-genotyping was used to identify the deletion mutants using the following primers (5’-3’): bmp6-genotype-F: GCAATACAATGCACTTGGGTCATGG; bmp6-genotype-R: CCACTCTTTAGTTGCTGTGCATACAC. Generation of anti-Npas4l polyclonal antibody The peptide antigen of zebrafish Npas4l 395-647 amino acids tagged by GST was cloned, expressed, and purified by Huabio Co. (Hangzhou, China). Immunization was performed on mice and rabbits by the Laboratory Animal Center, Peking University and the serum was collected as polyclonal antibody. Cell transfection To overexpress zebrafish Npas4l protein in vitro , HEK293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-npas4l-flag-myc vector with Fugen HD transfection reagents (Promega, 2311) according to manufacturer’s instructions. pcDNA3.1-npas4l-flag-myc vector was generated by inserting the flag- and myc-tagged zebrafish npas4l coding sequence into pcDNA3.1 vector backbone. Adult zebrafish heart dissociation For each sample, 15 adult ventricles were collected and placed in ice-cold perfusion buffer (in mM: 130 NaCl, 5 KCl, 0.5 NaH 2 PO 4 , 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 10 2,3-butanedionemonoxime, 10 taurine, 5 MgCl 2 , pH adjusted to 7.8 with NaOH). The ventricles were gently chopped, transferred, and digested in digestion buffer (10 mg/ml protease, 30 μg/ml DNase I in perfusion buffer) for 3 h at 4 °C with constant gentle agitation using a rotator. The digestion was then neutralized with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) and the disassociated cells were filtered through a 100 μm-strainer to remove large clumps and pelleted at 500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was re-suspended in Hank’s balance salt solution (HBSS). Single-cell RNA-seqencing (scRNA-seq) The dissociated cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (1:300 diluted in HBSS), passed through a 70 μm-strainer, and loaded on a Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP system to remove cell debris and sort for single cells. The sorted single cells were pelleted at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet was re-suspended in HBSS. Cell viability and concentration were measured on a Countstar Rigel system (ALIT Life Science). Samples with >85% cell viability were qualified for single-cell loading. Around 12,000 cells per sample were loaded into a 10x Genomics Chromium chip. Single-cell RNA-seq libraries were generated using Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3’ Kit v3.1 (10x Genomics, 1000269) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quality control of the cDNA and library was performed on an Agilent 4150 TapeStation. The concentrations of cDNA and library were measured by a Qubit dsDNA high sensitivity assay (Invitrogen, Q33230). The sequencing was performed on an Illumina Novaseq PE150 platform operated by Peking Novogene Co. Single-cell RNA-seq data processing The Cell Ranger (v3.0.2) pipeline (10x Genomics) was used to demultiplex the cellular barcodes and align reads to the GRCz11 zebrafish reference genome. The output filtered gene expression matrices were loaded and analyzed using the Seurat package (v3.1.4) ( Butler et al., 2018 ). Potential doublet cells were detected and filtered using the R package DoubletFinder (v2.0.2) ( McGinnis et al., 2019 ). Low-quality cells were removed from the datasets based on the following criteria: (1) the number of detected genes ≤200 or ≥4,000, the percentage of mitochondrial genes≥25 for non-CMs; and (2) the number of detected genes ≤200 or ≥4,000 for CMs. The mitochondrial content was not filtered due to the nature of CMs containing a high mitochondrial density ( Gladka et al., 2018 ; Suryawanshi et al., 2020 ). Then, gene expression matrices were normalized by the NormalizeData function and highly variable genes were calculated using the FindVariableFeatures function. Cell clustering and annotation To integrate cells into a shared space from different samples, we applied the integration methods described at https://satijalab.org/seurat/v3.0/integration.html ( Stuart et al., 2019 ). In brief, we selected 2,000 features for integration using the SelectIntegrationFeatures function, identified ‘anchors’ between individual datasets with the FindIntegrationAnchors function, and integrated cells with identified ‘anchors’ using the IntegrateData function. Next, gene expression matrices were scaled with a linear transformation by the ScaleData function. Then, we applied principal component analysis (PCA) by the RunPCA function to achieve linear dimensional reduction after data scaling. After that, the ElbowPlot and JackStrawPlot functions were used to identify the dimensionality of the integrated datasets. Finally, we clustered cells using the FindNeighbors and FindClusters functions and performed nonlinear dimensional reduction with the RunTSNE function. To annotate cell types, the FindAllMarkers function was used to identify cluster-specific marker genes for each of the identified clusters, and the clusters were then classified and annotated based on the expression of canonical markers. Next, we applied a second round of clustering to further characterize subpopulations of CMs, ECs, and platelets. To avoid unexpected noise, mitochondrial genes and ribosome biogenesis genes were removed ( Gladka et al., 2018 ; Luo et al., 2022 ; Suryawanshi et al., 2020 ; Xue et al., 2022 ). The integration, scaling, PCA, and clustering were applied as described above. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) The pathways used here are 50 hallmark pathways, GO terms, and KEGG pathways described in the molecular signature database ( Subramanian et al., 2005 ). To obtain these pathways for zebrafish, we used the R package msigdbr (v7.0.1). Each cluster analyzed was downsampled to 200 cells because of the low cell number of some clusters. To assign pathway activity estimates to individual cells, we applied GSVA using standard settings, as implemented in the GSVA R package (v1.35.7) ( Hanzelmann et al., 2013 ). The differential activities of pathways between clusters were calculated using the Limma R package (v3.38.3) ( Ritchie et al., 2015 ). Significantly disturbed pathways were identified with a Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected P value of ≤0.05. Cell–cell communication analysis To investigate potential interactions across different cell types, cell–cell communication was analyzed using CellPhoneDB (v2.1.4) ( Efremova et al., 2020 ) with default parameters. In brief, a log2-normalized count matrix was subsampled into 300 cells per cluster. Then, we used the biomaRt R package (v2.38.0) ( Durinck et al., 2009 ) to convert the genes of zebrafish to its orthologs in humans, due to the lack of interaction databases for zebrafish. RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR For RNA extraction from adult zebrafish hearts, 10 ventricles were pooled to extract RNA for each sample. The total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, 15596026). RNA purity and concentration were determined using NanoDrop2000. 500 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, RR037A). RNA extraction and cDNA generation of sorted CD41 + or gata1a + cells were performed using the SMART-seq2 method ( Picelli et al., 2014 ) with modifications. In brief, ventricular dissection and cardiac cell dissociation were carried out as described above on Tg(CD41:eGFP) and Tg(gata1a:dsRed) hearts. Either 6,000 eGFP + or dsRed + cells were sorted into lysis buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 1 U/μl RNase inhibitor, 2.5 μM Oligo dT primer, 2.5 mM dNTP) on a Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP system. After vortex and incubation for 3 min at 72℃, total mRNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, 18064014). cDNA was then amplified using KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Huaruikang, kk2602) and purified using VAHTS DNA Clean Beads (Vazyme, N411). cDNA concentration was measured using the Qubit dsDNA high sensitivity assay. Real-time quantitative PCR was carried out in triplicate using ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Q411) on a Roche LightCycler96 system. To compensate for variations in RNA input and efficiency of reverse transcription, rpl13a was used for normalization. The primers used in this work were: gapdh -F: GATACACGGAGCACCAGGTT and gapdh -R: GCCATCAGGTCACATACACG; rpl13a -F: TCTGGAGGACTGTAAGAGGTATGC and rpl13a -R: AGACGCACAATCTTGAGAGCAG; npas4l -F: GCCACAGCAGACGCAGAGAT and npas4l -R: ACACTGAGGAGAGGCAGAGGAG; bmp6 -F: GAACCGCAATCGCTCCAGTAGTC and bmp6 -R: AGCCTTCAGGTGCAATAATCCAGTC; vegfc -F: GTCAACCTCTCAACCGCACCAA and vegfc -R: GCCATTGTCCGTTAGCATTCAGC; admb -F: CTAACCAACCAACCAAGACGCTCT and admb -R: CTGTCATGTCGCTCTCGCTTCTC; apln -F: ACACGCACACCACTACAGTATATCA and apln -R: GCTTCCCACCTCCTCAATCTCTTT; tfpia -F: GGAACGCCAACAACTTCAAGACCAT and tfpia -R: ATCTCCTCTCAGAGCCGTCACAATC; and thbs1b -F: CCTCAATCCACACCATCCTGACTC and thbs1b -R: TTGAACCACCACACCAAGACCTT; bmp2a -F: GTGAACGCAGAGCAGGTTAGCA and bmp2a -R: GGATGGAGGTCAGGTTGAAGAGGA; bmp2b -F: ACGCTTGCTCAATATGTTCGGATT and bmp2b -R: CTCGCCAGGAATGGAGGTAAGG; bmp7a -F: TGCTGGACTCACGAGTGGTATGG and bmp7a -R: GCGGAGGTGGATTCCTGATGCT; bmp7b -F: GAGACCTTGGATGGCAGGATTGGA and bmp7b -R: CGGAGATGGCGTGGAGTTGTGT. Bulk RNA-sequencing RNA was extracted and cDNA was generated from sorted CD41 + or gata1a + cells as above. 1 ng cDNA per sample was used to generate a library using the TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 for Illumina (Vazyme, TD503) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 1 ng cDNA was fragmented using TruePrep Tagment Enzyme and then ligated with specific indexes. After amplification using TruePrep Amplify Enzyme, the cDNA library was purified using VAHTS DNA Clean Beads. The cDNA concentration was measured using Qubit dsDNA high sensitivity assay. The sequencing was performed on an Illumina Novaseq PE150 platform operated by Peking Novogene Co. Bulk RNA-seq data processing Raw sequencing data quality was analyzed using FastQC (v0.11.4) and processed by Trim Galore (v0.6.0) to remove adapters and low-quality reads. Clean reads were aligned to the GRCz11 zebrafish reference genome using HISAT2 (v2.1.0) ( Kim et al., 2019 ). The read counts were generated with HTseq (0.6.1p1) ( Temin, 1966 ). The genes needed to have 10 reads in at least one replicate for subsequent differential expression analysis. Differential gene expression was analyzed using the DESeq2 R package (v1.22.1) ( Love et al., 2014 ). Genes with a p-value 0.485 (fold change >1.4) were considered to represent significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The pathway analysis of DEGs was performed using the Metascape webtool ( www.metascape.org ) ( Zhou et al., 2019 ). ChIP-seq with CUT&TAG method For each sample, 30 adult ventricles were collected and digested as described above with modifications. The ventricles were gently chopped, transferred, and digested in digestion buffer for 15 min at 4 °C with constant gentle agitation using a rotator. The digestion was then neutralized with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) and the dissociated cells were filtered through a 100 μm-strainer to remove large clumps and pelleted at 500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet which mainly contained platelets and erythrocytes was re-suspended in Hank’s balance salt solution (HBSS). Then, around 2000,000 cells per sample were fixed in 0.2% formaldehyde for 2 min and neutralized by adding glycine to a final concentration 25 mM. The fixed cells were pelleted at 800 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, washed twice with PBS and loaded for CUT&TAG reaction using Hyperactive Universal CUT&TAG Assay Kit for Illumina Pro (Vazyme, TD904) and Mouse anti-HA Tag antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-7392) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentrations of library were measured by a Qubit dsDNA high sensitivity assay. The sequencing was performed on a BGI DNBSEQ-T7 PE150 platform operated by Peking GenePlus Co. Raw sequencing data was processed as mentioned above. Clean reads were aligned to the GRCz11 zebrafish reference genome using the Bowtie 2 (v2.4.5) software ( Langmead and Salzberg, 2012 ). The aligned BAM files were then sorted and deduplicated using the samtools (v1.15.1) and Picard (v2.1.0) to mitigate PCR artifacts ( Danecek et al., 2021 ). The MACS2 (v2.2.7.1) was employed with parameters “-p 0.05” to call peaks ( Zhang et al., 2008 ). The deepTools (v3.5.0) and ggcoverage (v1.4.0) were used to generate the heatmap and track plot separately ( Ramirez et al., 2016 ; Song and Wang, 2023 ). The motif enrichment is performed using HOMER (v3.12) with default parameters ( Heinz et al., 2010 ). Whole-mount RNAscope in situ hybridization in zebrafish embryos Zebrafish embryos were collected and then fixed in 10% NBF (neutral buffered formalin, Solarbio, G2161) at room temperature for 24 h. The fixed embryos were washed with PBST (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS) and dehydrated. After drying for half an hour, the embryos were treated with Protease Plus (ACD, 322330) for 20 min at room temperature followed by washout with PBST. For npas4l hybridization assay, RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagent Kit-BROWN (ACD, 322300) was applied to visualize signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. In brief, the RNAscope Probe-Dr- npas4l (ACD, 483481) probe was applied to the embryos for hybridization (overnight at 40℃). After washout with 0.2× SSCT, the embryos were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS at room temperature for 10 min ( Gross-Thebing et al., 2014 ). The embryos were incubated with Amp1-6 as described in the instructions and washed with 0.2× SSCT after each Amp treatment. The signals were visualized using DAB substrates provided in the kit mentioned above. After washout with water, dehydration by serial methanol dilution, clearing with benzyl benzoate (Sigma, B17700) and benzyl alcohol (Sigma. B16208) mixture (2 volumes of benzyl benzoate and 1 volume of benzyl alcohol), the embryos were fixed in neutral balsam (Solarbio, G8590) and photographed under a Leica DM5000B microscope. RNAscope in situ hybridization on fresh frozen heart sections Zebrafish hearts were dissected, freshly embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound (Sakura, 4583), and stored at −80 °C. 7 μm-thick cryosections were cut on a Leica CM1950 Cryostat Microtome. RNAscope pre-treatment was performed using RNAscope H 2 O 2 and Protease Reagent Kits (ACD, 322381) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, cryosections were fixed in pre-chilled 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 15 min at 4 °C. After dehydration and air drying for 5 min, the sections were treated with RNAscope hydrogen peroxide for 10 min at room temperature. After washout with water, the slides were incubated with RNAscope Protease IV for 8 min at room temperature and then washed with PBS. For npas4l sole-hybridization assays, RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagent Kit-BROWN (ACD, 322300) was applied to visualize signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For dual-hybridization assays, RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex Reagent Kit (ACD, 322430) was used to visualize signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For itga2b sole-hybridization assays, RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex Reagent Kit was applied to visualize signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. In brief, the pre-treated slides were incubated with target probe and AMP1-6 as described in the instructions followed by signal visualization. For bmp6 sole-hybridization assays, RNAscope 2.5 HD Duplex Reagent Kit was applied to visualize signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. In brief, the pre-treated slides were incubated with target probe and AMP1-3, 8-10 as described in the instructions followed by signal visualization. All the above slides were co-stained with eosin (Solarbio, G1120) or Mayer’s hematoxylin (Solarbio, G1080) and mounted with Eukitt(R) quick-hardening mounting medium for microscopy (Sigma, A2303989). For cre - itga2b and cre-gata1a dual-hybridization co-stained with MHC immunofluorescence assays, the pre-treated slides were incubated with anti-MHC monoclonal antibody (eBioscience, 14-6503-82, 1:300 diluted in Co-Detection Antibody Diluent) overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the slides were washed with PBST and fixed in 10% neutral formalin fix solution (NBF) for 30min at room temperature. After washout with PBST, the RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Detection Reagents v2 was used to visualized the signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After signal visualization, the slides were incubated with secondary antibody (1:300 diluted in Co-Detection Antibody Diluent) for 1h at room temperature. After washout with PBST, the slides were mounted with fluorescence mounting medium with DAPI (ZSGB-BIO, ZLI-9557). For npas4l sole-hybridization with MHC immunofluorescence assays, RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagent Kit-BROWN was applied to visualize signals according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. In brief, after visualization of RNAscope signals, the slides were blocked in blocking solution (1% Tween-20, 10% FBS, 1% DMSO in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with anti-MHC monoclonal antibody (1:300 diluted in blocking solution) overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the slides were washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibody (1:300 diluted in blocking solution) for 2 h at room temperature. After washout with PBS, the slides were mounted with fluorescence mounting medium with DAPI. The RNAscope probes used in this study were: RNAscope Probe-Dr- npas4l (ACD, 483481), RNAscope Probe-Cre (ACD, 312281), RNAscope Probe-Dr- bmp6 -C1 (ACD, 1105911-C1), RNAscope Probe-Dr- gata1a -C2 (ACD, 473371-C2), RNAscope Probe-Dr- itga2b -C2 (ACD, 555601-C2), RNAscope Probe-Dr- kdrl -C2 (ACD, 416611-C2), RNAscope Probe-Dr- postnb -C2(ACD, 525381-C2), and RNAscope Probe-Dr- tcf21 -C2 (ACD, 485341-C2). All images were captured under a Leica DM5000B and Nikon LSM AXR microscopes. To quantify npas4l signals in injured hearts, 3 fields (0.2 × 0.15 mm) per heart within the wound area were acquired using a ×63 objective and the npas4l + areas were measured using ImageJ. To quantify itga2b signals in injured heart, itga2b + areas within the wound area were measured using ImageJ. The ratio of itga2b + area versus the length of the apical wound was calculated for each heart. To quantify itga2b signals in uninjured heart, itga2b + areas within the entire ventricle were measured using ImageJ. Sections with the largest wound area for apex resected hearts or with the largest ventricle size for uninjured hearts or hearts with genetic ablation of cardiomyocytes were analyzed. Immunofluorescence on adherent cultured cells The cells were washed three times with pre-chilled PBS then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 15 min at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, the cells were blocked with blocking solution (1% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature then incubated with Rabbit anti-Npas4l antibody (1:300 diluted in blocking solution) and Mouse anti-Myc Tag (Engibody, AT0023, 1:300 diluted in blocking solution) at 4 °C overnight. The next day, the cells were washed three times with 1% BSA/PBST (0.02% Tween-20 in PBS) then incubated with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A21206, 1:300 diluted in blocking solution), goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen, A21422, 1:300 diluted in blocking solution) for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes with PBST, the cells were mounted with fluorescence mounting medium with DAPI (ZSGB-BIO, ZLI-9557). All images were captured under Zeiss LSM710, LSM980 and Nikon LSM AXR confocal microscopes. Immunofluorescence on zebrafish heart sections Zebrafish hearts were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 1 h at room temperature. After dehydration, the hearts were embedded in paraffin using a Leica HistoCore Arcadia H-Heated Paraffin Embedding Station. 5 μm-thick paraffin sections were cut on a Leica RM2265 microtome. The paraffin sections were used for immunofluorescence as described previously ( Han et al., 2014 ; Xiao et al., 2016 ). The primary antibodies used in this work were: Rabbit anti-Mef2c (Sigma, HPA005533, 1:200), Rabbit anti-Mef2a+Mef2c (Abcam, ab197070, 1:300), Rabbit anti-Fli1 (Abcam, ab133485, 1:300), Mouse anti-PCNA (Santa Cruz, sc-25280, 1:300), Mouse anti-PCNA (Santa Cruz, sc-56, 1:50), Rat anti-BrdU (Abcam, ab6326, 1:300), Rabbit anti-GFP (Invitrogen, A-11122, 1:300), Rabbit anti-Sarcomeric alpha Actinin (Abcam, ab68167, 1:300) and Mouse anti-myosin heavy-chain monoclonal antibody (eBioscience, 14-6503-82, 1:500). The secondary antibodies used were: donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A21206, 1:300), goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen, A21422, 1:300), donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A32766, 1:300) and goat anti-rat Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen, A21434, 1:300). All images were captured under Zeiss LSM710, LSM980 and Nikon LSM AXR confocal microscopes. To quantify CM or EC proliferation, Mef2 + /PCNA + , Mef2 + /BrdU + , Fli1 + /PCNA + , or Fli1 + /BrdU + cells were manually counted and then were divided by the total numbers of Mef2 + or Fli1 + nuclei to get the proliferation index. For each ventricular resected heart, the cells within the area 100 μm from the wound edge were included in the analysis. For each uninjured heart or heart with genetic ablation of CMs, the cells within the entire ventricle were included in analysis. To quantify ECs, immune cells or platelets, Fli1 + , coro1a :eGFP + , and CD41 :eGFP + areas within the wound were measured using ImageJ and then normalized by the length of the wound. Sections with the largest wound area for apex resected hearts or with the largest ventricle size for uninjured hearts or hearts with genetic ablation of cardiomyocytes were analyzed. Acid Fuchsin Orange-G staining (AFOG) Paraffin sections were used for AFOG staining as described previously ( Xiao et al., 2016 ). The slides were photographed under a Leica DM5000B microscope. To quantify regeneration level, the hearts were categorized into three levels of regeneration, not regenerated (severe), partially regenerated (partial), and fully regenerated (regenerated) according to the scar size. Serial sections for each heart were analyzed. Protein extraction and western blot For protein extraction from adult zebrafish hearts, 10 ventricles were pooled to extract protein for each sample. The ventricles were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer (Solarbio, R0010) with 1 mM PMSF (Sigma, 93482), PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 04906845001), and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 11873580001). The supernatant was collected for each protein sample. Then the protein was quantified using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Solarbio, PC0020) and loaded with Prestained Protein Marker (Vazyme, MP102) for western blots as described previously ( Zhou et al., 2022 ). The primary antibodies used were: Mouse anti-Npas4l (1:1000), Mouse anti-Myc Tag (Engibody, AT0023, 1:1000), Rabbit anti-Bmp6 (Abcam, ab155963, 1:3000), and Rabbit anti-β-actin (Huabio, ET1701-80, 1:3000). The secondary antibodies used were: goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Easybio, BE0101, 1:3000) and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Easybio, BE0102, 1:3000). Imaging was performed using the ChemiDoc MP Imaging System with Image Lab software (Bio-Rad). Quantification was performed using ImageJ and relative expression was normalized by β-actin. Statistical analysis Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The value of n is noted in the figures/figure legends and always stands for separate biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20. Statistical differences between two samples were compared using unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t test. Comparative statistics among multiple samples were performed using one-way ANOVA with the LSD test. Categorical variables between two samples were analyzed using Pearson chi-square test. scRNA-seq data were analyzed using unpaired, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test, and P values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant and individual p values are noted in the figures/figure legends. Supplementary Figures and Figures Legends Supplementary Figures S1-S17 Supplementary Tables S1-S7 Acknowledgements The authors thank Prof. Mark C. Fishman (Harvard University) and Prof. IC Bruce (Guest Professor at the College of Future Technology, Peking University) for commenting on and revising the manuscript; and members of Dr. Jing-Wei Xiong’s and Dr. Jianbin Wang’s laboratories for helpful discussions and technical assistance. The authors thank Dr. Yiyue Zhang at South-China University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou, China) for kindly providing Tg(CD41:eGFP) la2 and mpl smu3 zebrafish lines and Dr. Wenqing Zhang at South-China University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou, China) for kindly providing the CD41:dsRed construct. The authors thank the National Center for Protein Sciences at Peking University, particularly Dr. Liying Du at the Flow Cytometry Core for technical help on the Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP and Dr. Guilan Li for technical help on single-cell RNA-seq library construction; and Drs. Liqin Fu, Siying Qin and Chunyan Shan at the Optical Imaging Platform of the Core Facility, School of Life Sciences and National Biomedical Imaging Center, Peking University for assistance with the Zeiss LSM710, LSM980 and Nikon LSM AXR. This work is supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFA1800600 and 2018YFA0800501); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32230032, 31730061, 81870198 and T2225005); and the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFA0800200). JH is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Nanchang University and an internal fund from the School of Basic Medical Sciences, Nanchang University. References ↵ Adam , M. , Potter , A.S. , and Potter , S.S . ( 2017 ). Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single-cell RNA-seq artifacts: a molecular atlas of kidney development . Development 144 , 3625 – 3632 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Barrientos , S. , Stojadinovic , O. , Golinko , M.S. , Brem , H. , and Tomic-Canic , M . ( 2008 ). Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing . Wound Repair Regen 16 , 585 – 601 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Bersell , K. , Arab , S. , Haring , B. , and Kuhn , B . ( 2009 ). Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury . Cell 138 , 257 – 270 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Bronnimann , D. , Annese , T. , Gorr , T.A. , and Djonov , V . ( 2018 ). Splitting of circulating red blood cells as an in vivo mechanism of erythrocyte maturation in developing zebrafish, chick and mouse embryos . J Exp Biol 221 . ↵ Butler , A. , Hoffman , P. , Smibert , P. , Papalexi , E. , and Satija , R . ( 2018 ). Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species . Nat Biotechnol 36 , 411 – 420 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Capon , S.J. , Uribe , V. , Dominado , N. , Ehrlich , O. , and Smith , K.A . ( 2022 ). Endocardial identity is established during early somitogenesis by Bmp signalling acting upstream of npas4l and etv2 . Development 149 . ↵ Chang , N. , Sun , C. , Gao , L. , Zhu , D. , Xu , X. , Zhu , X. , Xiong , J.W. , and Xi , J.J . ( 2013 ). Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos . Cell Res 23 , 465 – 472 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Curado , S. , Anderson , R.M. , Jungblut , B. , Mumm , J. , Schroeter , E. , and Stainier , D.Y . ( 2007 ). Conditional targeted cell ablation in zebrafish: a new tool for regeneration studies . Dev Dyn 236 , 1025 – 1035 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Danecek , P. , Bonfield , J.K. , Liddle , J. , Marshall , J. , Ohan , V. , Pollard , M.O. , Whitwham , A. , Keane , T. , McCarthy , S.A. , Davies , R.M. , et al. ( 2021 ). Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools . Gigascience 10 . ↵ Dao , D.T. , Anez-Bustillos , L. , Adam , R.M. , Puder , M. , and Bielenberg , D.R . ( 2018 ). Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor as a Critical Mediator of Tissue Repair and Regeneration . Am J Pathol 188 , 2446 – 2456 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Du , J. , Zheng , L. , Gao , P. , Yang , H. , Yang , W.J. , Guo , F. , Liang , R. , Feng , M. , Wang , Z. , Zhang , Z. , et al. ( 2022 ). A small-molecule cocktail promotes mammalian cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration . Cell Stem Cell 29 , 545 – 558 e513 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Durinck , S. , Spellman , P.T. , Birney , E. , and Huber , W. ( 2009 ). Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt . Nat Protoc 4 , 1184 – 1191 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Efremova , M. , Vento-Tormo , M. , Teichmann , S.A. , and Vento-Tormo , R . ( 2020 ). CellPhoneDB: inferring cell-cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand-receptor complexes . Nat Protoc 15 , 1484 – 1506 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ El-Sammak , H. , Yang , B. , Guenther , S. , Chen , W. , Marin-Juez , R. , and Stainier , D.Y.R . ( 2022 ). A Vegfc-Emilin2a-Cxcl8a Signaling Axis Required for Zebrafish Cardiac Regeneration . Circ Res 130 , 1014 – 1029 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Eulalio , A. , Mano , M. , Dal Ferro , M. , Zentilin , L. , Sinagra , G. , Zacchigna , S. , and Giacca , M . ( 2012 ). Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration . Nature 492 , 376 – 381 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Fang , Y. , Lai , K.S. , She , P. , Sun , J. , Tao , W. , and Zhong , T.P . ( 2020 ). Tbx20 Induction Promotes Zebrafish Heart Regeneration by Inducing Cardiomyocyte Dedifferentiation and Endocardial Expansion . Front Cell Dev Biol 8 , 738 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gemberling , M. , Karra , R. , Dickson , A.L. , and Poss , K.D . ( 2015 ). Nrg1 is an injury-induced cardiomyocyte mitogen for the endogenous heart regeneration program in zebrafish . Elife 4 . ↵ Gladka , M.M. , Molenaar , B. , de Ruiter , H. , van der Elst , S. , Tsui , H. , Versteeg , D. , Lacraz , G.P.A. , Huibers , M.M.H. , van Oudenaarden , A. , and van Rooij , E. ( 2018 ). Single-Cell Sequencing of the Healthy and Diseased Heart Reveals Cytoskeleton-Associated Protein 4 as a New Modulator of Fibroblasts Activation . Circulation 138 , 166 – 180 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Golebiewska , E.M. , and Poole , A.W . ( 2015 ). Platelet secretion: From haemostasis to wound healing and beyond . Blood Rev 29 , 153 – 162 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gross-Thebing , T. , Paksa , A. , and Raz , E . ( 2014 ). Simultaneous high-resolution detection of multiple transcripts combined with localization of proteins in whole-mount embryos . BMC Biol 12 , 55 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Grover , S.P. , Bergmeier , W. , and Mackman , N . ( 2018 ). Platelet Signaling Pathways and New Inhibitors . Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 38 , e28 – e35 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text ↵ Han , P. , Zhou , X.H. , Chang , N. , Xiao , C.L. , Yan , S. , Ren , H. , Yang , X.Z. , Zhang , M.L. , Wu , Q. , Tang , B. , et al. ( 2014 ). Hydrogen peroxide primes heart regeneration with a derepression mechanism . Cell Res 24 , 1091 – 1107 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Hanzelmann , S. , Castelo , R. , and Guinney , J . ( 2013 ). GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data . BMC Bioinformatics 14 , 7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Harrison , M.R. , Bussmann , J. , Huang , Y. , Zhao , L. , Osorio , A. , Burns , C.G. , Burns , C.E. , Sucov , H.M. , Siekmann , A.F. , and Lien , C.L . ( 2015 ). Chemokine-guided angiogenesis directs coronary vasculature formation in zebrafish . Dev Cell 33 , 442 – 454 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Harrison , M.R. , Feng , X. , Mo , G. , Aguayo , A. , Villafuerte , J. , Yoshida , T. , Pearson , C.A. , Schulte-Merker , S. , and Lien , C.L . ( 2019 ). Late developing cardiac lymphatic vasculature supports adult zebrafish heart function and regeneration . Elife 8 . ↵ Heicklen-Klein , A. , and Evans , T . ( 2004 ). T-box binding sites are required for activity of a cardiac GATA-4 enhancer . Dev Biol 267 , 490 – 504 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Heinz , S. , Benner , C. , Spann , N. , Bertolino , E. , Lin , Y.C. , Laslo , P. , Cheng , J.X. , Murre , C. , Singh , H. , and Glass , C.K . ( 2010 ). Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities . Mol Cell 38 , 576 – 589 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Honkoop , H. , de Bakker , D.E. , Aharonov , A. , Kruse , F. , Shakked , A. , Nguyen , P.D. , de Heus , C. , Garric , L. , Muraro , M.J. , Shoffner , A. , et al. ( 2019 ). Single-cell analysis uncovers that metabolic reprogramming by ErbB2 signaling is essential for cardiomyocyte proliferation in the regenerating heart . Elife 8 . ↵ Hu , B. , Lelek , S. , Spanjaard , B. , El-Sammak , H. , Simoes , M.G. , Mintcheva , J. , Aliee , H. , Schafer , R. , Meyer , A.M. , Theis , F. , et al. ( 2022 ). Origin and function of activated fibroblast states during zebrafish heart regeneration . Nat Genet 54 , 1227 – 1237 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jin , S.W. , Beis , D. , Mitchell , T. , Chen , J.N. , and Stainier , D.Y . ( 2005 ). Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular tube and lumen formation in zebrafish . Development 132 , 5199 – 5209 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Johnson , N.R. , and Wang , Y . ( 2013 ). Controlled delivery of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor yields fast and comprehensive wound healing . J Control Release 166 , 124 – 129 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Johnson , N.R. , and Wang , Y . ( 2015 ). Coacervate delivery of HB-EGF accelerates healing of type 2 diabetic wounds . Wound Repair Regen 23 , 591 – 600 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jopling , C. , Sleep , E. , Raya , M. , Marti , M. , Raya , A. , and Izpisua Belmonte , J.C . ( 2010 ). Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation . Nature 464 , 606 – 609 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kawakami , K. , Takeda , H. , Kawakami , N. , Kobayashi , M. , Matsuda , N. , and Mishina , M . ( 2004 ). A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish . Dev Cell 7 , 133 – 144 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kikuchi , K. , Gupta , V. , Wang , J. , Holdway , J.E. , Wills , A.A. , Fang , Y. , and Poss , K.D . ( 2011 ). tcf21+ epicardial cells adopt non-myocardial fates during zebrafish heart development and regeneration . Development 138 , 2895 – 2902 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Kikuchi , K. , Holdway , J.E. , Werdich , A.A. , Anderson , R.M. , Fang , Y. , Egnaczyk , G.F. , Evans , T. , Macrae , C.A. , Stainier , D.Y. , and Poss , K.D . ( 2010 ). Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes . Nature 464 , 601 – 605 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kim , D. , Paggi , J.M. , Park , C. , Bennett , C. , and Salzberg , S.L . ( 2019 ). Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype . Nat Biotechnol 37 , 907 – 915 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Langmead , B. , and Salzberg , S.L . ( 2012 ). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 . Nat Methods 9 , 357 – 359 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Li , Y.J. , and Hu , B . ( 2012 ). Establishment of multi-site infection model in zebrafish larvae for studying Staphylococcus aureus infectious disease . J Genet Genomics 39 , 521 – 534 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lin , H.F. , Traver , D. , Zhu , H. , Dooley , K. , Paw , B.H. , Zon , L.I. , and Handin , R.I . ( 2005 ). Analysis of thrombocyte development in CD41-GFP transgenic zebrafish . Blood 106 , 3803 – 3810 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Lin , Q. , Lian , J. , Wu , J. , Meng , P. , Sun , Y. , Wu , L. , and Zhang , Y . ( 2022 ). Erythropoietin receptor contributes to thrombopoietin receptor (Mpl)-independent thrombocytopoiesis in zebrafish . Leukemia 36 , 1193 – 1197 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Lin , Q. , Zhang , Y. , Zhou , R. , Zheng , Y. , Zhao , L. , Huang , M. , Zhang , X. , Leung , A.Y.H. , Zhang , W. , and Zhang , Y . ( 2017 ). Establishment of a congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia model and a thrombocyte-specific reporter line in zebrafish . Leukemia 31 , 1206 – 1216 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Liu , Y. , Du , L. , Osato , M. , Teo , E.H. , Qian , F. , Jin , H. , Zhen , F. , Xu , J. , Guo , L. , Huang , H. , et al. ( 2007 ). The zebrafish udu gene encodes a novel nuclear factor and is essential for primitive erythroid cell development . Blood 110 , 99 – 106 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Long , Q. , Meng , A. , Wang , H. , Jessen , J.R. , Farrell , M.J. , and Lin , S . ( 1997 ). GATA-1 expression pattern can be recapitulated in living transgenic zebrafish using GFP reporter gene . Development 124 , 4105 – 4111 . OpenUrl Abstract ↵ Love , M.I. , Huber , W. , and Anders , S . ( 2014 ). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 . Genome Biol 15 , 550 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Luo , Z. , Xia , M. , Shi , W. , Zhao , C. , Wang , J. , Xin , D. , Dong , X. , Xiong , Y. , Zhang , F. , Berry , K. , et al. ( 2022 ). Human fetal cerebellar cell atlas informs medulloblastoma origin and oncogenesis . Nature 612 , 787 – 794 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ma , H. , Liu , Z. , Yang , Y. , Feng , D. , Dong , Y. , Garbutt , T.A. , Hu , Z. , Wang , L. , Luan , C. , Cooper , C.D. , et al. ( 2021 ). Functional coordination of non-myocytes plays a key role in adult zebrafish heart regeneration . EMBO Rep 22 , e52901 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Marass , M. , Beisaw , A. , Gerri , C. , Luzzani , F. , Fukuda , N. , Gunther , S. , Kuenne , C. , Reischauer , S. , and Stainier , D.Y.R . ( 2019 ). Genome-wide strategies reveal target genes of Npas4l associated with vascular development in zebrafish . Development 146 . ↵ Marin-Juez , R. , Marass , M. , Gauvrit , S. , Rossi , A. , Lai , S.L. , Materna , S.C. , Black , B.L. , and Stainier , D.Y . ( 2016 ). Fast revascularization of the injured area is essential to support zebrafish heart regeneration . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113 , 11237 – 11242 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Mattonet , K. , Riemslagh , F.W. , Guenther , S. , Prummel , K.D. , Kesavan , G. , Hans , S. , Ebersberger , I. , Brand , M. , Burger , A. , Reischauer , S. , et al. ( 2022 ). Endothelial versus pronephron fate decision is modulated by the transcription factors Cloche/Npas4l, Tal1, and Lmo2 . Sci Adv 8 , eabn2082 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ McGinnis , C.S. , Murrow , L.M. , and Gartner , Z.J . ( 2019 ). DoubletFinder: Doublet Detection in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Using Artificial Nearest Neighbors . Cell Syst 8 , 329 – 337 e324. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Mezger , M. , Nording , H. , Sauter , R. , Graf , T. , Heim , C. , von Bubnoff , N. , Ensminger , S.M. , and Langer , H.F. ( 2019 ). Platelets and Immune Responses During Thromboinflammation . Front Immunol 10 , 1731 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Monroe , T.O. , Hill , M.C. , Morikawa , Y. , Leach , J.P. , Heallen , T. , Cao , S. , Krijger , P.H.L. , de Laat , W. , Wehrens , X.H.T. , Rodney , G.G. , et al. ( 2019 ). YAP Partially Reprograms Chromatin Accessibility to Directly Induce Adult Cardiogenesis In Vivo . Dev Cell 48 , 765 – 779 e767. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Mosimann , C. , Kaufman , C.K. , Li , P. , Pugach , E.K. , Tamplin , O.J. , and Zon , L.I . ( 2011 ). Ubiquitous transgene expression and Cre-based recombination driven by the ubiquitin promoter in zebrafish . Development 138 , 169 – 177 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Munch , J. , Grivas , D. , Gonzalez-Rajal , A. , Torregrosa-Carrion , R. , and de la Pompa , J.L. ( 2017 ). Notch signalling restricts inflammation and serpine1 expression in the dynamic endocardium of the regenerating zebrafish heart . Development 144 , 1425 – 1440 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Ogawa , M. , Geng , F.S. , Humphreys , D.T. , Kristianto , E. , Sheng , D.Z. , Hui , S.P. , Zhang , Y. , Sugimoto , K. , Nakayama , M. , Zheng , D. , et al. ( 2021 ). Kruppel-like factor 1 is a core cardiomyogenic trigger in zebrafish . Science 372 , 201 – 205 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Picelli , S. , Faridani , O.R. , Bjorklund , A.K. , Winberg , G. , Sagasser , S. , and Sandberg , R . ( 2014 ). Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2 . Nat Protoc 9 , 171 – 181 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Poss , K.D. , Wilson , L.G. , and Keating , M.T . ( 2002 ). Heart regeneration in zebrafish . Science 298 , 2188 – 2190 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Ramirez , F. , Ryan , D.P. , Gruning , B. , Bhardwaj , V. , Kilpert , F. , Richter , A.S. , Heyne , S. , Dundar , F. , and Manke , T . ( 2016 ). deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis . Nucleic Acids Res 44 , W160 – 165 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Reischauer , S. , Stone , O.A. , Villasenor , A. , Chi , N. , Jin , S.W. , Martin , M. , Lee , M.T. , Fukuda , N. , Marass , M. , Witty , A. , et al. ( 2016 ). Cloche is a bHLH-PAS transcription factor that drives haemato-vascular specification . Nature 535 , 294 – 298 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ritchie , M.E. , Phipson , B. , Wu , D. , Hu , Y. , Law , C.W. , Shi , W. , and Smyth , G.K . ( 2015 ). Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies . Nucleic Acids Res 43 , e47 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Rohlfing , A.K. , Kolb , K. , Sigle , M. , Ziegler , M. , Bild , A. , Munzer , P. , Sudmann , J. , Dicenta , V. , Harm , T. , Manke , M.C. , et al. ( 2022 ). ACKR3 regulates platelet activation and ischemia-reperfusion tissue injury . Nat Commun 13 , 1823 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Song , Y. , and Wang , J . ( 2023 ). ggcoverage: an R package to visualize and annotate genome coverage for various NGS data . BMC Bioinformatics 24 , 309 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Stainier , D.Y. , Weinstein , B.M. , Detrich , H.W ., 3rd . , Zon , L.I. , and Fishman , M.C. ( 1995 ). Cloche, an early acting zebrafish gene, is required by both the endothelial and hematopoietic lineages . Development 121 , 3141 – 3150 . OpenUrl Abstract ↵ Stuart , T. , Butler , A. , Hoffman , P. , Hafemeister , C. , Papalexi , E. , Mauck , W.M ., 3rd . , Hao , Y. , Stoeckius , M. , Smibert , P. , and Satija , R. ( 2019 ). Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data . Cell 177 , 1888 – 1902 e1821. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Subramanian , A. , Tamayo , P. , Mootha , V.K. , Mukherjee , S. , Ebert , B.L. , Gillette , M.A. , Paulovich , A. , Pomeroy , S.L. , Golub , T.R. , Lander , E.S. , et al. ( 2005 ). Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 , 15545 – 15550 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Suryawanshi , H. , Clancy , R. , Morozov , P. , Halushka , M.K. , Buyon , J.P. , and Tuschl , T . ( 2020 ). Cell atlas of the foetal human heart and implications for autoimmune-mediated congenital heart block . Cardiovasc Res 116 , 1446 – 1457 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Takemura , T. , Yoshida , Y. , Kiso , S. , Saji , Y. , Ezaki , H. , Hamano , M. , Kizu , T. , Egawa , M. , Chatani , N. , Furuta , K. , et al. ( 2013 ). Conditional knockout of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in the liver accelerates carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in mice . Hepatol Res 43 , 384 – 393 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Temin , H.M . ( 1966 ). Studies on carcinogenesis by avian sarcoma viruses. 3. The differential effect of serum and polyanions on multiplication of uninfected and converted cells . J Natl Cancer Inst 37 , 167 – 175 . OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science ↵ Traver , D. , Paw , B.H. , Poss , K.D. , Penberthy , W.T. , Lin , S. , and Zon , L.I . ( 2003 ). Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants . Nat Immunol 4 , 1238 – 1246 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Tzahor , E. , and Poss , K.D . ( 2017 ). Cardiac regeneration strategies: Staying young at heart . Science 356 , 1035 – 1039 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Versteeg , H.H. , Heemskerk , J.W. , Levi , M. , and Reitsma , P.H . ( 2013 ). New fundamentals in hemostasis . Physiol Rev 93 , 327 – 358 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Xiao , C. , Gao , L. , Hou , Y. , Xu , C. , Chang , N. , Wang , F. , Hu , K. , He , A. , Luo , Y. , Wang , J. , et al. ( 2016 ). Chromatin-remodelling factor Brg1 regulates myocardial proliferation and regeneration in zebrafish . Nat Commun 7 , 13787 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Xie , S. , Fu , W. , Yu , G. , Hu , X. , Lai , K.S. , Peng , X. , Zhou , Y. , Zhu , X. , Christov , P. , Sawyer , L. , et al. ( 2020 ). Discovering small molecules as Wnt inhibitors that promote heart regeneration and injury repair . J Mol Cell Biol 12 , 42 – 54 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Xiong , J.W. , Yu , Q. , Zhang , J. , and Mably , J.D . ( 2008 ). An acyltransferase controls the generation of hematopoietic and endothelial lineages in zebrafish . Circ Res 102 , 1057 – 1064 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Xue , R. , Zhang , Q. , Cao , Q. , Kong , R. , Xiang , X. , Liu , H. , Feng , M. , Wang , F. , Cheng , J. , Li , Z. , et al. ( 2022 ). Liver tumour immune microenvironment subtypes and neutrophil heterogeneity . Nature 612 , 141 – 147 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhang , Y. , Liu , T. , Meyer , C.A. , Eeckhoute , J. , Johnson , D.S. , Bernstein , B.E. , Nusbaum , C. , Myers , R.M. , Brown , M. , Li , W. , et al. ( 2008 ). Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) . Genome Biol 9 , R137 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zheng , L. , Du , J. , Wang , Z. , Zhou , Q. , Zhu , X. , and Xiong , J.W . ( 2021 ). Molecular regulation of myocardial proliferation and regeneration . Cell Regen 10 , 13 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhou , X. , Zhang , C. , Wu , X. , Hu , X. , Zhang , Y. , Wang , X. , Zheng , L. , Gao , P. , Du , J. , Zheng , W. , et al. ( 2022 ). Dusp6 deficiency attenuates neutrophil-mediated cardiac damage in the acute inflammatory phase of myocardial infarction . Nat Commun 13 , 6672 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhou , Y. , Zhou , B. , Pache , L. , Chang , M. , Khodabakhshi , A.H. , Tanaseichuk , O. , Benner , C. , and Chanda , S.K . ( 2019 ). Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets . Nat Commun 10 , 1523 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 21, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Cloche/Npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor during zebrafish heart regeneration Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Cloche/Npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor during zebrafish heart regeneration Junjie Hou , Yabing Song , Chenglu Xiao , Yuanyuan Sun , Jie Shen , Xiaokai Ma , Qinchao Zhou , Shih-Ching Chiu , Yang Xu , Yanyi Huang , Ye-Guang Chen , Xiaojun Zhu , Jianbin Wang , Jing-Wei Xiong bioRxiv 2025.02.19.639191; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.19.639191 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Cloche/Npas4l is a pro-regenerative platelet factor during zebrafish heart regeneration Junjie Hou , Yabing Song , Chenglu Xiao , Yuanyuan Sun , Jie Shen , Xiaokai Ma , Qinchao Zhou , Shih-Ching Chiu , Yang Xu , Yanyi Huang , Ye-Guang Chen , Xiaojun Zhu , Jianbin Wang , Jing-Wei Xiong bioRxiv 2025.02.19.639191; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.19.639191 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cell Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7635) Biochemistry (17691) Bioengineering (13892) Bioinformatics (41937) Biophysics (21452) Cancer Biology (18588) Cell Biology (25504) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13378) Ecology (19899) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24320) Genetics (15609) Genomics (22506) Immunology (17736) Microbiology (40394) Molecular Biology (17181) Neuroscience (88605) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2832) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4824) Physiology (7641) Plant Biology (15156) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4294) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00