Characterization of the Gastrointestinal Tract Holstein x Angus Cross Cattle Microbiome During Harvest after Feed Withdrawal

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,706 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Stress during the beef pre-harvest period can induce an inflammatory response and acidotic conditions in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), which affects the gastrointestinal tract microbiome. The objective of this study was to characterize the status of the GIT microbiome at harvest in beef cattle entering a small USDA processing facility. Nine beef cattle were shipped from a producer in Columbia County, WI to the USDA processing facility at University of Wisconsin-Madison and were harvested across four dates. Digesta samples were collected from eight GIT locations: rumen solids, rumen liquids, abomasum, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and large intestines. After DNA extraction with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Sequences were analyzed for alpha and beta diversity metrics (ANOVA and ADONOS), core microbiome, ANCOM, and co-occurrence network analyses. Harvest date and GIT location had a significant impact on microbial diversity and community composition (P<0.05), and there was an interaction between GIT location and harvest date (P<0.05). Taxonomic composition shifted throughout the GIT, though Prevotella and Treponema were core members in several different GIT locations. The co-occurrence analysis revealed microorganisms potentially associated with clinical infections, such as Moryella in the rumen and Acinetobacter in the hindgut, were considered keystone species. These results suggest that the pre-harvest period may negatively impact the beef cattle GIT microbiome. Modulating the GIT microbiome during the pre-harvest period may offer an opportunity to improve food safety.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00