Fine-scale habitat partitioning of sympatric stingrays revealed by drone-based remote sensing and deep learning

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,894 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Habitat partitioning supports the coexistence of sympatric species and shapes their ecological roles across coastal seascapes. Understanding how sympatric species move through and use coastal habitats therefore provides fundamental ecological insight. Aerial drones provide new opportunities to monitor fine-scale movement and habitat utilisation of elasmobranchs in shallow waters. Here, we use drones to investigate fine-scale habitat partitioning and foraging behaviour among stingrays in a coastal lagoon in the central Red Sea. We conducted 30 aerial transect surveys (~17 ha each) and tracked 40 rays and 1 shark (total tracking time > 23 h). Using a double-observer protocol (manual + AI-assisted), 1,468 rays (6 species) and 4 sharks (2 species) were recorded from the transect surveys. Transect detections were dominated by bluespotted ribbontail rays (Taeniura lymma; n = 1,221) and larger-bodied whiprays (predominantly Himantura uarnak; n = 187). AI-assisted image analysis outperformed human analysts detecting 97% of these observations, compared to 76% for human analysts. We found pronounced habitat partitioning at sub-kilometre scales: bluespotted rays occupied the shallowest (< 0.4 m deep) lagoonal areas, away from open water, with foraging-related digging concentrated along the mangrove edge, identifying this zone as a key feeding ground and bioturbation hotspot. Whiprays predominated on macroalgal reef flat habitats and appeared to forage non-disruptively on epifaunal prey. Both taxa aggregated with conspecifics. Together, our results demonstrate that contrasting micro-habitat preferences and foraging strategies structure the spatial ecology of sympatric stingrays and highlight how drone-based monitoring coupled with AI can scale ecological inference in nearshore ecosystems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00