A systematic analysis of brain tissue response to microelectrode material and size with single-cell spatial transcriptomics

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,869 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Implantable microelectrode arrays can interface with the central nervous system to record from and/or stimulate neural tissues to treat neurological disease and injury. The chronic tissue response to implanted electrodes is believed to be a driving factor behind microelectrode failure. Next-generation electrodes have been developed to attenuate the tissue response by reducing electrode size and/or incorporating softer materials. In this study, we used single-cell-resolution spatial transcriptomics to quantify the tissue response to implanted electrodes within custom-classified cell types in the rat brain. To test the effects of implant material and size, we assessed polyimide and silicon electrodes of 10 µm and 100 µm cross-sectional dimensions over 6-weeks post-implantation. Our data indicate that implants are associated with upregulation of inflammatory genes in glia that are coupled to damage-initiated losses in synaptic transmission and subsequent engagement of compensatory protective mechanisms (e.g., re-myelination, antioxidant production) to preserve local neurons. While bulk tissue analysis reinforced previously reported observations of glial scar consolidation over time, single cell analysis revealed an unexpected, progressive heightening of the expression of inflammatory genes in individual device-reactive astrocytes. With respect to design features, the impact of device dimensions more heavily influenced responses than material type, particularly by the 6-week time point. Our results add single-cell resolution observations to the growing use of transcriptomics to understand the biocompatibility of devices implanted in the brain. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Contributing authors: thom1069{at}msu.edu; chakra96{at}msu.edu; wadelau2{at}msu.edu; reimersm{at}msu.edu

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00