Identification of motor unit discharges from ultrasound images: Analysis of in silico and in vivo experiments

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,781 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective Ultrasound (US) images during a muscle contraction can be decoded into individual motor unit (MU) activity, i.e., trains of neural discharges from the spinal cord. However, current decoding algorithms assume a stationary mixing matrix, i.e. equal mechanical twitches at each discharge. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of these approaches in non-ideal conditions when the mechanical twitches in response to neural discharges vary over time and are partially fused in tetanic contractions.

Methods

We performed an in silico experiment to study the decomposition accuracy for changes in simulation parameters, including the twitch waveforms, spatial territories, and motoneuron-driven activity. Then, we explored the consistency of the in silico findings with an in vivo experiment on the tibialis anterior muscle at varying contraction forces.

Results

A large population of MU spike trains across different excitatory drives, and noise levels could be identified. The identified MUs with varying twitch waveforms resulted in varying amplitudes of the estimated sources correlated with the ground truth twitch amplitudes. The identified spike trains had a wide range of firing rates, and the later recruited MUs with larger twitch amplitudes were easier to identify than those with small amplitudes. Finally, the in silico and in vivo results were consistent, and the method could identify MU spike trains in US images at least up to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

Conclusion

The decoding method was accurate irrespective of the varying twitch-like shapes or the degree of twitch fusion, indicating robustness, important for neural interfacing applications. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00