Associations between gut microbiota and personality traits: insights from a captive common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) colony

Associations between gut microbiota and personality traits: insights from a captive common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) colony | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Associations between gut microbiota and personality traits: insights from a captive common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ) colony View ORCID Profile Huimin Ye , View ORCID Profile Vedrana Šlipogor , View ORCID Profile Buck T. Hanson , View ORCID Profile Joana Séneca , View ORCID Profile Bela Hausmann , View ORCID Profile Craig W. Herbold , View ORCID Profile Petra Pjevac , View ORCID Profile Thomas Bugnyar , View ORCID Profile Alexander Loy doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.12.637913 Huimin Ye a Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria b Doctoral School in Microbiology and Environmental Science, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria c APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork , Cork, Ireland Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Huimin Ye For correspondence: yehuiminyhm{at}gmail.com vedrana.slipogor{at}unil.ch Vedrana Šlipogor d Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne , Lausanne, Switzerland e The Sense Innovation and Research Center, Lausanne & Sion , Lausanne, Switzerland f Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Vedrana Šlipogor For correspondence: yehuiminyhm{at}gmail.com vedrana.slipogor{at}unil.ch Buck T. Hanson a Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria g Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory , Los Alamos, NM, United States Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Buck T. Hanson Joana Séneca a Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria h Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria i Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Joana Séneca Bela Hausmann h Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria i Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Bela Hausmann Craig W. Herbold a Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria j Te Kura Pūtaiao Koiora, School of Biological Sciences, Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, University of Canterbury , Christchurch, New Zealand Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Craig W. Herbold Petra Pjevac a Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria h Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Petra Pjevac Thomas Bugnyar f Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Thomas Bugnyar Alexander Loy a Division of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria h Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Alexander Loy Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Recent studies have suggested the link between inter-individual behavioural variation (i.e., animal personality) and gut microbiota. Non-human primates living under controlled conditions are valuable models to investigate diet-independent microbiome-host interactions. In this study, we investigated links between specific gut microbiota members and personality traits, as well as group membership, sex, age class, breeding status and relatedness of 26 captive common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus ), maintained under the same diet and housing conditions. Personality was assessed using an established testing battery in repeated tests. Then, we collected a total of 225 fecal samples during the summers of 2017 and 2019 from five marmoset social groups for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Within-individual microbiota variance was smaller than that between group members. Group members also exhibited more similar gut microbiota than individuals from different groups in each sampling year. Beta diversity of the gut microbiota was linked with personality traits, age class, sex, and breeding status, but not with genetic relatedness. We identified specific bacterial taxa associated with personality traits. In particular, members of the sulfite-reducing genera Desulfovibrio were enriched in more avoidant marmosets. Amplicon sequencing of the dissimilatory sulfite reductase gene dsrB confirmed this pattern, yet additionally revealed an unknown uncultured bacterium that was the predominant sulfite-reducing bacterium in the fecal samples and was linked to more explorative individuals. These findings highlight specific association patterns between selected microbial taxa and personality traits in captive common marmosets. Importance This study provides valuable insights into the intricate relationship between gut microbiota and host personality traits, using captive common marmosets as a model. By controlling for diet and housing conditions, it probes key host factors such as personality, age, sex, and social group membership, offering a robust framework for understanding microbiome-host interactions. The discovery of specific microbial taxa associated with personality traits, particularly the enrichment of sulfite-reducing genera in more avoidant individuals, underscores the potential role of the gut microbiome in shaping or reflecting personality. These findings advance our understanding of microbiome-host dynamics and pave the way for future research on the mechanistic links between behavior and gut microbiota in other animal models and across broader ecological contexts. Introduction The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in host health by modulating metabolism ( 1 ), immunity ( 2 ), and behavior and cognition ( 3 ). The composition and function of the gut microbiota are influenced by various factors, including host genetics, birth delivery method, geography, age, medication, and diet ( 4 – 7 ). Investigating the potential causal relationships and associations between microbiota variability and these factors has been challenging, particularly in humans and wild non-human animals, due to the difficulty of controlling environmental or dietary variables. Therefore, studying these associations in non-human primate species closely related to humans under controlled conditions in captivity is a useful approach to uncovering the potential drivers of microbial composition. The common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ), a neotropical non-human primate species, has become one of the most commonly studied primates in biomedicine ( 8 ), as well as behavior and cognition research ( 9 , 10 ). This is due to its genetic proximity to humans, shared physiological and anatomical characteristics, and similar social organization ( 11 ). Studies on common marmosets held at different institutions ( 12 , 13 ) have focused on microbiota variability in captive colonies under different health statuses, social conditions, and laboratory environments ( 12 , 13 ). These studies have revealed significant variability in the gut microbiota of marmosets, identifying five dominant phyla in various healthy cohorts, namely Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria ( 12 ). Changes in microbial composition have also been documented in many intestinal diseases of common marmosets, such as inflammatory bowel disease ( 13 ), chronic diarrhea ( 14 ), and strictures ( 15 ). However, the specific factors that shape the microbial composition in captive marmosets are not yet comprehensively understood. The human gut microbiota has been associated with individual variation in cognition, (social) behavior, and personality ( 16 – 19 ). In particular, high gut microbiota diversity has been linked with larger social networks, suggesting a significant role of social interactions in shaping the gut microbiome ( 18 ). Additionally, gut microbiota diversity has been associated with positive emotion in Prevotella -dominant individuals ( 20 ). In captive animals, with uniform diet and environmental conditions, other potential drivers of microbiota variability, such as social behaviour or personality traits, can be more precisely investigated. Associations between gut microbiome and social behaviors have been observed in non-human primates. For instance, in infant rhesus macaques ( Macaca mulatta ), breast-fed individuals developed distinct gut microbiomes and immune systems compared to bottle-fed individuals ( 21 ). Grooming-based social networks were shown to predict microbiota composition in wild savannah baboons ( Papio cynocephalus ) ( 22 ). In free-ranging rhesus macaques, Faecalibacterium was positively related to sociability, while less social individuals harbored higher abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria species ( 23 ). Recent research has uncovered significant associations between gut microbiota and personality, characterized as consistent inter-individual differences in behavior patterns that remain stable over time and/or across different contexts and situations ( 27 , 28 ), in both humans and non-human animals ( 16 , 18 , 24 – 26 ). For instance, high microbiota diversity has been positively linked with exploration, openness and sociability and negatively to stress and anxiety ( 16 , 18 ). A recent study on Tibetan macaques ( Macaca thibetana ) reported positive correlations of Akkermansia , Dialister , and Asteroleplasma with sociability scores and links between the gut microbiota and macaque personality ( 29 ). Previous research has demonstrated the stability of personality structure in captive marmosets over both short-term (two weeks) ( 31 ) and long-term (four years) periods ( 32 ). Another recent study found that group membership impacted the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiome in wild common marmosets ( 30 ). However, to date, no studies have established associations between personality and gut microbiome in marmosets. Sulfite-reducing bacteria (SRB) are a specific functional group of gut bacteria linked to cognition ( 33 – 36 ). SRB use inorganic (e.g., sulfate, thiosulfate) and organic (e.g., taurine) sulfur compounds as sources of sulfite for anaerobic respiration to hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) via dissimilatory sulfite reductases ( 37 , 38 ). H 2 S has various dose-dependent impacts on the host, including contrasting effects on cognition ( 34 ). For instance, the introduction of live Desulfovibrio vulgaris, which causes a high level of H 2 S production, resulted in impaired cognitive functions of C57BL/6 mice ( 39 ). Conversely, treatment with sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), an H 2 S donor, protected rats from cognitive impairment during hepatic ischemia ( 40 ). Moreover, NaHS ameliorated formaldehyde-induced cognitive dysfunction by reducing hippocampal oxidative damage and apoptosis ( 41 ). Furthermore, H 2 S has been linked to inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer ( 42 , 43 ). The diversity and role of intestinal SRB is largely known from studies on humans and laboratory mice, but little is known about SRB in other animals. In this study, we aimed to identify the factors driving gut microbiota variability in captive common marmosets. We analyzed 225 fecal samples from 26 individuals living in five social groups, all maintained under the same controlled diet and housing conditions over two years. We linked gut microbiota variability, analyzed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, to individual characteristics, like group membership, age class, sex, relatedness and breeding status, and previously obtained personality profiles ( 44 ), assessed by five repeated personality tests. We hypothesized that i) within-individual microbiota variance would be smaller than between-individual variance; ii) group members would share a more similar gut microbiome composition than non-group members; iii) age, sex, relatedness, and breeding status would impact the microbiome composition; and iv) personality traits including Exploration-Avoidance, Boldness-Shyness, and Stress/Activity would be associated with gut microbiota. Additionally, we investigated the diversity of SRB by amplicon sequencing of their marker gene dsrB , encoding dissimilatory sulfite reductase. Materials and methods Ethical statement The research on marmoset personality was approved by the Animal Ethics and Experimentation Board, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna (Approval Number 2015-13), and adhered to the legal requirements of Austria. The study also adhered to the American Society of Primatologists’ principles for the ethical treatment of primates. The housing conditions were in accordance with Austrian legislation and the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Animals Twenty-six common marmosets born in captivity and housed in five different social groups at the Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria, participated in this study. The marmosets were classified into three age classes: juveniles (age age ≥ 1 y), and older adults (herefrom labelled “old”; age ≥ 12 y). This division was made as marmosets in the wild rarely live longer than 12 years ( 45 ). Each social group lived in an indoor cage (250x250x250 cm) connected to an outdoor cage (250x250x250 cm). These wire mesh cages were connected to an experimental compartment via a passageway system of tunnels with moveable doors. Wood pellets were used as floor bedding in each indoor cage, and different climbing and resting structures and objects (i.e., branches, ropes, blankets, textiles, sleeping baskets, and boxes) were placed in the cages. Room temperature was maintained at 21-29°C, and humidity was controlled at 30-60%. A 12:12 hr light:dark cycle was maintained throughout the study. During personality testing, the animals were fed daily in the morning hours with New World primate biscuits (Mazuri food, USA) and at noon with a selection of seasonal fruits, vegetables, grains, milk products, marmoset jelly, marmoset gum, protein, vitamin supplements, and insects (mealworms and crickets). During the fecal sample collection, the animals were fed immediately after taking the samples in the morning (i.e., around 11 AM), with food they usually received for breakfast and lunch. This diet was consistently maintained throughout the sampling period. All common marmosets had ad libitum access to water. Fecal sample collection and DNA Extraction We analyzed a total of 225 fecal samples collected during two periods: May to August in 2017 and June to August in 2019. Marmosets were released into tunnels, where movable doors were used to separate each individual into different sections of the tunnel. Feces fell through the tunnel onto 70% ethanol-sterilized trays positioned below. Each individual was kept in the tunnel for 15 min, with visual access to the group members to alleviate any possible stress, and feces was collected immediately after defecation. Subsamples were preserved in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and stored at -20°C (Supplementary Table S1). Nucleic acids were extracted from feces as previously described ( 46 ). Briefly, thawed samples were resuspended in 0.5 ml cetyltrimethylammonium bromide buffer (pH 8) and transferred to a Lysing Matrix E tube (MP Biomedicals, USA) containing 0.5 ml phenol:chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; pH 8, Carl Roth GmbH, Germany). Cells were lysed by bead-beating (FastPrep-24 bead beater, MP Biomedicals, Heidelberg, Germany) for 30 s and cooled on dry ice, followed by centrifugation for 5 min at 4°C (16,000 x g). Aqueous supernatants were transferred to a sterile 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube containing 0.5 ml chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1, Carl Roth GmbH, Germany) and mixed. Samples were centrifuged for 5 min at room temperature (16,000 x g), and aqueous supernatants were removed to a sterile 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube. One ml polyethylene glycol/NaCl solution (30% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 8,000, 1.6 M NaCl) was added to precipitate nucleic acids at room temperature for two hours. Nucleic acids were precipitated by centrifugation for 10 min at 4°C (18,000 x g) and washed twice with ice-cold 70% molecular grade ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Nucleic acid pellets were air dried under ambient room conditions and resuspended in 50 µl Tris-EDTA (pH 8.0) buffer, and stored at -20°C for subsequent 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. A subset of DNA samples collected in 2017 (n = 75) was selected for dsrB gene amplicon sequencing, ensuring that most individuals were included at least once. 16S rRNA gene and dsrB amplicon sequencing Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene hypervariable V3-V4 regions was performed after amplification and barcoding with primer 341F and 785R ( 47 ). Sequencing of the beta subunit of dissimilatory sulfite reductase ( dsrB ) gene was carried out with primers DSR1762Fmix and DSR2107Rmix) ( 48 ). A two-step amplification and barcoding approach was employed as described in Herbold et al., (2015) for samples collected in 2017, and Pjevac et al., (2021) for samples collected in 2019. Barcoded libraries were pooled at equivalent copy numbers (20x10 9 ) and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq (V3 chemistry, 600 cycles). Raw data processing was performed as described previously ( 49 ). Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were inferred using the DADA2 R package v1.42 applying the recommended workflow ( 50 ). FASTQ reads 1 and 2 were trimmed at 230 nt with allowed expected errors of 4 and 6, respectively. ASV sequences were subsequently classified using DADA2 and the SILVA database SSU Ref NR 99 release 138.1 ( 50 , 51 ) using a confidence threshold of 0.5. The dsrB gene sequencing data were analyzed according to the procedures outlined previously ( 48 ) and clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTU) based on a nucleotide sequence similarity cut-off of 97% using Uparse ( 52 ). Representative dsrB sequences were classified using phylogenetic placement with a curated DsrB gene reference sequence database and corresponding consensus tree ( 48 , 53 ). Microbiome profiling Sequencing data were analyzed using the software packages Phyloseq (version 1.48.0) ( 54 ) and microeco (version 1.7.1) ( 55 ) in R (version 4.4.0). For alpha-diversity (Shannon and Simpson indices) and beta-diversity (Bray-Curtis distances) analyses, the OTU/ASV tables were rarefied at the depth of the smallest library size. Differential analysis of taxa was performed using the random forest method ( 56 , 57 ), a machine learning program that can identify an optimal set of taxa with high discriminative power. Linear mixed models (LMM) and mantel test to identify factors that shape gut microbiota composition in common marmosets We computed linear mixed models (LMM) using the function lmer of the lme4 package (version 1.1.35.3) with the optimiser “bobyqa” ( 58 ). For all models, covariates were z-transformed to improve model fit. Random slopes were incorporated to maintain Type I error rates at the nominal level of 5% ( 59 ). After fitting each linear mixed-effects regression (lmer) model, we verified the assumptions of normality, homoscedasticity and collinearity, and assessed model stability. P -values for individual effects were derived from likelihood ratio tests comparing the full model to the respective null or reduced models (using the ANOVA function with the "Chisq" test argument), facilitated by the drop1 function ( 59 ). Null models included only intercepts, random effects, and random slopes, while reduced models also incorporated assigned control factors. We calculated effect sizes for the full models, considering both fixed and random effects, using the r.squaredGLMM function from the MuMIn package (version 1.43.17) ( 60 ). Confidence intervals were estimated through parametric bootstrapping with an adjusted bootMer function from the lme4 package. All models used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Data preparation The 16S rRNA gene ASV table produced by the DADA2 pipeline was normalized using geometric means of pairwise ratios (GMPR, .0.1.3) ( 61 ), a method designed for zero-inflated count data, and was applied to microbiome sequencing data. A phylogenetic tree was built using representative ASV sequences. ASV sequences were aligned using the package DECIPHER (v3.0.0) ( 62 ), and the tree was built with the package phangorn (v2.22.1) ( 63 ). A midpoint rooted tree was used to calculate the alpha diversity indice phylogenetic diversities (PD) with the picante package (v1.8.2 ) ( 64 ). The generalized UniFrac distances (GUniFrac) were calculated for beta diversity using the GUniFrac package (v1.8) ( 65 ). All statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 4.4.0). Mantel test - beta diversity and group membership We conducted Mantel tests ( 66 ) to investigate the relationship between group membership and beta diversity using 1,000 permutations. Mantel tests were performed on samples from each sampling year, yielding the mean absolute differences in dissimilarities within and between the groups. LMM I - Beta diversity within the same individual Only dyads of individuals within the same social group in the same year were selected for analysis to investigate if the same individual has more similar gut microbiota compared to other group members. The mean value of GUniFrac distances of the same individual in the same year was used as a response, the factor “Same ID” was used as a fixed factor, “IDDyad (e.g., monkey A-B)” and “Group ID” were used as random effects. The “sampling year” was used as a control factor and as a random slope. LMM II - Beta diversity within related individuals We investigated the effect of maternal relatedness on gut microbiome similarity. All the genetic histories of the individuals were well documented. We assigned relatedness coefficients (RC) to different kinships: RC = 0.8 for twins, RC = 0.5 for mother-offspring and siblings, and RC = 0.25 for half siblings ( Figure 1 ). The mean GUniFrac distances of individual dyads per year were used as a response, the relatedness coefficient between these individuals was used as a fixed effect, and individual dyad (e.g., monkey A-monkey B) was used as a random effect. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Social group structure and genetic relatedness of the animals. All animals are allocated in two adjacent lab rooms. The animals are housed in social groups (A-E) in separate cages, ensuring they do not have visual contact with other family groups. Sex symbols represent individual animals, each identified by a name abbreviation. The relationship between individuals is indicated by connecting lines. Red lines: twins; black lines: mother and children. Two new-born animals in group D and a new-born animal in group B after the first sampling period (2017 summer) are marked in orange. After the 2017 summer, KO moved from group B to group E, and GI from group C passed away. LMM III- Beta diversity within individuals with the same breeding status We investigated the effect of breeding status on gut microbiota similarity. Marmosets were assigned into breeder and helper groups based on their breeding status within the social group. The mean GUniFrac distances of gut microbiota between group members per sampling year were used as a response. Breeding status (BreedingDyad, e.g., breeder-helper) was used as a fixed effect, and “GroupDyad (e.g., group A-group B)” and “IDDyad” were used as random effects. LMM IV - Effect of sampling year, age, and sex on beta diversity We examined the potential correlation of microbiota similarity between group members, age classes, sexes, and sampling years. The mean GUniFrac distances between group members per year were used as a response, and age class (e.g., juvenile-adult), sex dyads (e.g., female-female), and sampling year (e.g., 2017-2019) were used as predictors. Relatedness was included as a control factor. Individual dyads and group ID were used as random effects. Influence of personality traits on gut microbiota Personality tests of the same marmoset colony were performed in 2016 and the results were published for 27 marmosets ( 44 ). To briefly summarize, behavioral variables across five personality tests, namely Activity, Novel Object, Novel Food, Predator, and Foraging Under Risk fell within the higher repeatability range of personality studies. The personality characterization obtained by the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) resulted in three personality components: ‘Exploration-Avoidance’ (36.8% of variance), ‘Boldness-Shyness’ (19.9% of variance), and ‘Stress/Activity’ (14.2% of variance) (Supplementary Table S3). In this study, individuals were divided into groups based on their personality scores on principal components (e.g. Exploration and Avoidance). Thus, individuals with positive values of personality scores were assigned to Exploration, Shyness, and Higher Stress/Activity groups, and those with negative values of personality scores were classified into Avoidance, Boldness, and Lower Stress/Activity groups. Random forest classification was used to determine the significantly different taxa among the defined personality traits. Microbiome Multivariable Association with Linear Models (Maaslin2) ( 67 ) was employed to test the associations between specific personality trait scores and microbial abundance at the genus level. In this analysis, we used the exact personality scores for correlation analysis rather than categorizing them into positive or negative groups. To account for confounding effects, sex, age class, breeding status, and social group membership were included as fixed effects in the model in addition to the personality traits. Significance was assigned to relationships with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25. dsrB phylogenetic analyses Representative sequences from each OTU were used for phylogenetic analyses. The reference dsrB gene sequences were obtained from a dsrB gene database ( 68 ). Collected dsrB gene sequences were aligned with MAFFT (v7.520) ( 69 ), and trimmed using TrimAl (v1.4) ( 70 ) with the flag “-automated 1”. Maximum-likelihood trees were created using the IQ-TREE web server with automatic substitution model selection and ultrafast bootstrapping (1000x) ( 71 – 73 ). The trees were visualized and annotated with iTOL (version 6.9) ( 74 ). We examined the relationship between the beta diversity of SRB and sulfate concentrations in the fecal samples (n = 68) using the Mantel test with permutations = 9999. Fecal short-chain fatty acids analysis Fecal samples collected in 2017 (n = 123) were used for short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) measurement. Fecal samples were diluted to the same concentration with sterile water (0.05 g feces/µL) and centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4°C (21,000 x g). Supernatants were collected into clean 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes for SCFA measurement. SCFAs were measured with a capillary electrophoresis P/ACE–MDQ (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) equipped with a UV detector with a 230 nm wavelength filter. The capillary was a fused silica column (TSP075375; 75 µm ID, Polymicro Technologies), 60 cm long (50 cm to the detector) and 75 µm in diameter. Samples were prepared for analysis using a CEofix Anions 5 Kit (Beckmann Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Analytes were separated in reverse polarity mode at 30 kV (ramp: 0.5 kV/s) for 10 min. All samples were diluted 1:10 with a working solution consisting of 0.01 M NaOH, 0.5 mM CaCl 2 and 0.1 mM caproate (internal standard). An external standard mixture of sodium sulfate and the SCFAs formate, succinate, acetate, lactate, propionate, butyrate, and valerate (1 mmol/each) was used for quantification. Data availability statement All 16S rRNA and dsrB gene sequence data presented in this article are available in the NCBI repository under BioProject accession number PRJNA1161472. The RScript used for the analyses of the data is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14860567 . Results Gut microbiota composition of common marmosets Over a period of two years, we collected 225 fecal samples from five groups of captive common marmosets and analyzed their gut microbiota composition using 16S rRNA and dsrB gene amplicon sequencing. The marmoset social group structure and their genetic relationships are depicted in Figure 1 , and the sample demographics are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The marmoset fecal microbiome was dominated by Bacteroidota (Mean ± S.D. = 56 ± 10.6%), followed by Firmicutes (21.7 ± 7.7%), Actinobacteria (9.9 ± 5.5%), and Proteobacteria (6.8 ± 5.3%) ( Supplementary Figure 1a ). At the family level, Bacteroidota was predominantly composed of Bacteroidaceae , Prevotellaceae , and Tannerellaceae . Firmicutes were mainly represented by Selenomonadaceae and Acidaminococcaceae. Actinobacteriota primarily consisted of Bifidobacteriaceae , while Proteobacteria was mainly represented by Sutterellaceae and Enterobacteriaceae ( Supplementary Figure 1b ). At the genus level, Bacteroides , Prevotella_9 , Parabacteroides , Megamonas , Bifidobacterium , and Phascolarctobacterium collectively contributed to more than 50% of the total microbial abundance ( Supplementary Figure 1c ). Variations in microbial composition were primarily observed across different social and age groups, with less variations noted in different sex and breeding status groups ( Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 2 ). Alpha-diversity was not significantly affected by social group, age, sex, or breeding status ( Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 2 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Microbial variation between social group, age class, sex, and breeding status groups in 2017. Averaged relative abundances at the genus level were grouped by social group, age class, sex, and breeding status (upper panel). No significant differences were observed in alpha diversity between different social, age class, sex, and breeding groups (lower panel). Shannon’s diversity was compared using Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparison test or t -test. Beta diversity of gut microbiota is associated with individual identity, social group, age, sex, and breeding status but not with genetic relatedness Linear mixed model analysis revealed that there was a significant effect of individual identity on the beta diversity of gut microbiota in the captive common marmoset colony (LMM I; likelihood ratio test comparing full and reduced model χ 2 = 26.53, df = 1, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.44/0.65) (Supplementary Table S4). Microbiota composition of fecal samples from the same individual (GUniFrac distance = 0.37 ± 0.06, mean ± SD) was more similar than that of samples from other individuals (GUniFrac distance = 0.42 ± 0.06, mean ± SD) of the same social group. The microbiota composition was also more similar within the same social group than between different social groups in both 2017 (Mantel test: N samples = 123, N individuals = 26, x̄ same group = 0.371, x̄different group = 0.386, p = 0.019) and 2019 (Mantel test: N samples = 105, N individuals = 28, x̄ same group = 0.445, x̄different group = 0.471, p = 0.002) (Supplementary Table S5). In contrast, relatedness was not linked with the microbiota similarity in common marmosets (LMM II, Supplementary Table S6), suggesting that maternal relatives, twins, or siblings did not share a more similar microbiota than unrelated individuals. The model examining correlations of GUniFrac distances of microbial composition with breeding status was significant (LMM III; likelihood ratio test comparing full and reduced model χ 2 = 9.008, df = 1, p = 0.003, R 2 = 0.37/0.74, Supplementary Table S7). In particular, individuals with the same breeding status (e.g., both breeders or both helpers) had more similar gut microbiota compared to individuals with different breeding statuses ( Supplementary Figure 3a ). Further, the model examining correlations of dyadic GUniFrac dissimilarity with sampling year, sex, and age class was likewise significant (LMM IV; likelihood ratio test comparing full and reduced model χ 2 = 33.163, df = 7, p < 0.05, R 2 = 0.48/0.77, Supplementary Table S8). Juvenile marmosets exhibit a more similar gut microbiota than other age group dyads, while high divergence of gut microbiota were observed in the older marmoset group ( Supplementary Figure 3b ). Finally, male marmoset dyads had a higher similarity in gut microbiota than other female-female or female-male dyads ( Supplementary Figure 3c ). Next, we performed a differential analysis based on the random forest algorithm to pinpoint microbiota differences at the genus level across different monkey groups. Different genera were identified as predictors for the same social groups in 2017 and 2019, which might have been due to group structure changes (i.e., as there were newborns in the group and one elder marmoset died between the sampling years ( Supplementary Figure 4a and b ). Yet, Helicobacter and Desulfovibrio were consistently identified in both 2017 and 2019 as predictor genera for juvenile and older adult marmosets, respectively. Moreover, the relative abundances of Succinatimonas , Prevotellaceae UCG-001, and Parabacteroides were higher in juvenile and adult marmosets than in older adult marmosets ( Supplementary Figures 4c and d ). No consistent predictor genus was identified for female and male marmosets in 2017 or 2019 ( Supplementary Figure 4e and f ). Additionally, Bacteroides , Bilophila , Erysipelatoclostridiaceae UCG-004, and Eubacterium were enriched in breeders in both 2017 and 2019. However, no consistent predictor genus was identified in helpers across the two years ( Supplementary Figure 4g and h ). Microbial variance between different personality groups We next investigated the association between personality traits and the gut microbiota. Individuals were divided into groups based on their personality scores on principal components. Thus, individuals with positive personality scores were assigned to Exploration, Shyness, and Higher Stress/Activity groups; those with negative personality scores were classified into Avoidance, Boldness, and Lower Stress/Activity groups. Exploration-Avoidance, Boldness-Shyness, and Stress/Activity personality traits had no impact on the alpha diversity. However, we observed significant differences in beta diversity in all three personality traits ( Figure 3a, c , and e ). Analysis of the Bray-Curtis distance between Boldness and Shyness group showed no significant difference. Thus, the Jaccard distance is shown instead ( Figure 3c ). Differential analysis based on the random forest algorithm revealed indicator taxa at the genus level among different personality groups ( Figure 3b, d , and f ). The mean decrease Gini coefficient is a measure of how each taxon contributes to the classification of each group ( 75 ). The higher the mean decrease in Gini scores, the more important the variable in the model. In the marmosets scoring high on Exploration, four genera, including Megasphaera , Prevotella _9, Libanicoccus , and Bifidobacterium, were prominently enriched (Mean Decrease Gini > 2). Conversely, Bacteroides , Desulfovibrio , Akkermansia , Alistipes , and Paenirhodobacter were enriched in the avoidant group of marmosets ( Figure 3b ). The marmosets scoring high in Shyness had an enrichment of seven taxa ( Helicobacter , Fusobacterium , Butyricicoccus , Novosphingobium , Clostridioides , Paenirhodobacter , and Holdemania ), while the bolder marmosets had only Rubrivivax enriched ( Figure 3d ). In the marmosets scoring high in Stress/Activity, four genera, including Parabacteroides , Prevotellaceae UCG-001, Sutterella , and Catenisphaera, were enriched. The gut microbiota of marmosets that scored lower on this trait were characterized by the enrichment of Butyricimonas , Bilophila , Oscillibacter , and Eisenbergiella ( Figure 3f ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Variation of beta diversity and the differential taxa among different personality groups. Beta-diversity analysis based on Bray-Curtis distance ( a & e ) and Jaccard distance ( c ). Differential taxa between different personality groups ( b , d & f ). Mean Decrease Gini measures the extent to which the identified taxa contribute to the classification of personality groups. Next, we performed a Maaslin2 analysis to identify specific microbial taxa significantly associated with personality traits, considering confounding factors such as social group, age class, sex, and breeding status. Maaslin2 analysis revealed twenty-eight taxa significantly associated with three aforementioned personality traits. Among them, seven taxa exhibited a significant negative correlation with Exploration-Avoidance PCA scores, including Bacteroides ( r = -0.24, q = 0.01, p < 0.001), Paenirhodobacter ( r = -0.40, q = 0.11, p = 0.002), Parasutterella ( r = -0.29, q = 0.16, p = 0.004), Anaerotruncus (r = -0.31, q = 0.19, p = 0.008), Staphylococcus ( r = -0.25, q = 0.19, p = 0.008), Niabella ( r = -0.33, q = 0.21, p = 0.01), Helicobacter ( r = -0.43, q = 0.23, p = 0.01). Prevotella _9 ( r = 0.44, q = 0.09, p = 0.002), whereas, unclassified Bacteroidales ( r = 0.50, q = 0.16, p = 0.004) were significantly positively correlated with the Exploration-Avoidance scores (Supplementary Table S9 and Supplementary Figure 5 ). Unclassified Muribaculaceae ( r = -0.,61 q = 0.01, p < 0.001), unclassified Barnesiellaceae ( r = -0.85, q = 0.09, p = 0.001), unclassified Prevotellaceae ( r = -0.68, q = 0.15, p = 0.004), unclassified Tannerellaceae ( r = -0.56, q = 0.15, p = 0.004), and Pseudorhodoferax ( r = -0.57, q = 0.18, p = 0.006) were significantly negatively associated, whereas, Helicobacte r ( r = 0.81, q = 0.12, p = 0.002), Butyricicoccus ( r = 0.68, q = 0.23, p = 0.01) and Martelella ( r = 0.37, q = 0.23, p = 0.01) were significantly positively associated with Boldness-Shyness scores. Ten taxa including Victivallis ( r = -0.88, q = 0.02, p < 0.001), UBA1819 ( r = -1.14, q = 0.03, p < 0.001), Eisenbergiella ( r = -1.06, q = 0.05, p < 0.001), Anaerotruncus ( r = -0.72, q = 0.08, p = 0.001), Paraburkholderia ( r = -0.48, q = 0.09, p = 0.002), unclassified Muribaculaceae ( r = -0.54, q = 0.13, p = 0.003), Paenirhodobacter ( r = -0.70, q = 0.16, p = 0.004), Alistipes ( r = -0.64, q = 0.19, p = 0.008), Paracoccus ( r = -0.75, q = 0.19, p = 0.006), and Rhizobium ( r = -0.58, q = 0.20, p = 0.009) were significantly negatively correlated, while unclassified Bacteroidales ( r = 85, q = 0.21, p = 0.01) was positively correlated with Stress/Activity scores. The composition of sulfite-reducing bacteria is associated with the Exploration-Avoidance personality trait Amplicon sequencing of the dissimilatory sulfite reductase dsrB gene, encoding the beta-subunit of a key microbial enzyme in the production of hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) was used to investigate the composition of SRB in the feces of common marmosets. Four operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (i.e., OTU 1, OTU 2, OTU 3, and OTU 4) dominated the dsrB diversity, collectively constituting approximately 98% of the sequencing reads across all samples ( Figure 4a ). OTU 1 was identified as a yet uncultured bacterium, with its closest relative Peptococcus niger (81.5% dsrB similarity), a species commonly found in the human gut microbiota ( 76 ) ( Figure 4b ). OTU 2, OTU 3, and OTU 4 were classified as members of the Desulfovibrionaceae family. Based on the proposed 90% dsrB sequence identity cut-off for species ( 48 ), OTU 2 and OTU 4 were identified as Desulfovibrio species (91.8% and 90.3% dsrB similarity, respectively) and OTU 3 was identified as Bilophila wadsworthia (97.0% dsrB similarity) ( Figure 4b ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Composition and phylogeny of sulfite-reducing bacteria (SRB). a. Relative abundance of SRB in the common marmoset colony. Each column shows a sample (n = 68). b. Maximum likelihood trees based on dsrB gene sequences (nucleic acid) obtained by dsrB gene amplicon sequencing. The phylogenetic analyses were carried out by using one representative sequence from each OTU. The reference dsrB sequences were obtained from Diao et. al. 2023. The tree is midpoint rooted. The four most abundant OTU IDs from this study are in blue. Bootstrap values >90% are presented on nodes as black-filled circles. The scale bar represents 30% (left) and 20% (right) sequence divergence, respectively. We observed no effect of social group, age class, sex, and breeding status on the beta diversity of SRB in marmosets. We then investigated the effect of personality traits on the diversity and composition of the SRB community in the common marmosets. Only Exploration-Avoidance showed a significant impact on the alpha diversity of SRB with lower Shannon index ( p = 0.003) and Simpson index ( p = 0.003) in the more explorative group compared to the more avoidant group ( Figure 5 a and b ). SRB beta diversity showed significant differences between individuals of the different Exploration-Avoidance groups ( Figure 5c ). Differential analysis based on the random forest algorithm was employed to determine differences in the relative abundance of individual dsrB OTUs across different groups ( Figure 5d ). SRB diversity in the Exploration group was enriched in OTU 1. The Avoidance group was characterized by the enrichment of OTUs belonging to Desulfovibrionaceae (OTU 2, 3, 4, and 15) and Desulfobulbaceae (OTU 102). The enrichment of Desulfovibrio (OTU 3) in the Avoidance group compared to the Exploration group was consistent with the results of the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis ( Figure 3b ). Additionally, the Mantel test revealed a positive correlation between the beta diversity of SRB and fecal sulfate concentrations (Spearman, r = 0.11, p = 0.02). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Variation of sulfite-reducing bacteria (SRB) among different personality groups. Alpha- ( a & b ) and beta-diversity ( c ) showed significant differences between Avoidance and Exploration groups. d. Indicators of sulfite-reducing bacteria (SRB) among Exploration and Avoidance personality groups. Indicator taxa were identified by random forest analysis. **, p < 0.01, t-test . Mean Decrease Gini measures the extent to which the identified taxa contribute to the classification of personality groups. Correlation between gut microbiota, SCFAs, and sulfate As the mechanism by which gut microbiota affect the host’s personality could be, in part, mediated by short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), we determined the association between individual fecal SCFAs and microbiota members ( Figure 6 ). The relative abundance of 24 of the 50 most abundant genera was correlated with the concentration of at least one SCFA ( Figure 6 ). Megasphaera ( p = 0.01) and Bifidobacterium ( p = 0.04), which were enriched in the more explorative marmosets, were positively correlated with fecal sulfate concentration. In contrast, taxa enriched in the more avoidant marmoset group, including Alistipes ( p < 0.001) and Desulfovibrio ( p < 0.001), were negatively correlated with sulfate concentration. Fusobacterium , identified as predictor taxa in shyer marmosets, was negatively correlated with formate ( p = 0.01) and valerate ( p = 0.04) and positively correlated with sulfate ( p = 0.045). Two predictor taxa in the more stressed/active marmoset group exhibited distinct associations with SCFA concentrations. Prevotellaceae UCG-001 was positively correlated with formate ( p = 0.02), propionate ( p < 0.001), and sulfate ( p = 0.01). In contrast, Sutterella was negatively correlated with butyrate ( p = 0.048), lactate ( p = 0.049), and valerate ( p < 0.001). Butyricimonas , a predictor taxa for the lower stress group, was negatively correlated with sulfate ( p < 0.001) and positively correlated with valerate ( p = 0.006). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Correlation between the gut microbiota (genus level) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and sulfate in fecal samples collected in 2017 (n = 123). The heatmap was constructed according to Spearman’s correlation between the top 50 most abundant genera and fecal SCFAs. The degree correlation is represented by color: red represents a positive correlation, and blue represents a negative correlation. The asterisks indicate the significance of the associations. p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Discussion In the present study, we explored the effects of personality traits, as well as social group, relatedness, sex, age class, and breeding status, on gut microbiome composition and variance in captive common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus ) over a two-year period. Our results revealed that within-individual microbiome variance was smaller than between-individual variance and that group members had more similar gut microbiota than non-group members. The personality of our study subjects, as well as their age class, sex, and breeding status, was linked with the beta diversity of the gut microbiota, while alpha diversity was unassociated with these factors. Relatedness neither impacted alpha or beta diversity in our study colony. Notably, our analysis identified an uncultured bacterium ( dsrB -OTU 1) as the dominant sulfite-reducing bacterium (SRB) in this population of marmosets. This study provides the first glimpse into the SRB diversity and the potential effects of various intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the gut microbiota in captive common marmosets under controlled diet and housing conditions. Previous studies in healthy marmosets have demonstrated significant plasticity in gut microbiota across institutions, with dominance observed in one of five phyla: Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, or Proteobacteria ( 12 ). The gut microbiota of our marmoset colony was dominated by one of these phyla across the two-year study period, namely Bacteroidota, recognized for its ability to break down complex carbohydrates. This is consistent with the diet provided to our colony, which includes tree exudates (i.e., gum) and seasonal fruits rich in complex plant polysaccharides. Sulfite-reducing bacteria, such as Desulfovibrio and Bilophila species, were detected in our marmoset colony using 16S rRNA and dsrB gene amplicon sequencing. Desulfovibrio , Desulfobacter , and Bilophila were previously identified SRB in humans and other animals ( 77 , 78 ). A previous study that investigated SRB composition in sooty mangabeys ( Cercocebus atys ) and baboons ( Papio hamadryas ) has shown that SRB composition is host species-specific in these primates ( 79 ). Additionally, Desulfovibrionales have been identified as the main SRB in black howler monkeys ( Alouatta caraya ) ( 80 ). In our study colony, dsrB OTU 1, which shares 81.5% similarity with Peptococcus niger , was identified as the dominant SRB. Another Peptococcus species, Peptococcus simiae , has been isolated from rhesus macaque feces and is known to produce hydrogen sulfide ( 81 ). Both P. simiae and P. niger can produce H 2 S from taurine or sulfite. Taurine is an important source of sulfite for SRB in the gut, derived from the diet, but primarily comes from microbial deconjugation of taurine-conjugated bile acids ( 82 ). In fact, plasma taurine concentrations in marmosets are significantly higher compared to humans ( 83 ). Bilophila wadsworthia , represented by dsrB OTU 3, is an ubiquitous taurine-respiring bacterium in the human gut ( 38 ). We thus hypothesize that the abundant SRB detected in our study use taurine as their main electron acceptor source for anaerobic respiration. Previous studies have found conserved microbiota profiles among co-housed marmosets ( 13 ). Consistently, there were no significant differences in alpha diversity of the gut microbiota between our laboratory-bred marmosets that were housed in a controlled environment and received the same diet. Herein, we show that beta diversity of the gut microbiota was associated with marmoset personality as well as their social group, sex, age class, and breeding status. Group members shared more similar gut microbiota compared to individuals from different groups. Yet, relatedness did not increase gut microbiota similarity. This is consistent with previous findings, e.g., in zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) and Damaraland mole-rats ( Fukomys damarensis ), where environmental effects rather than host genetics or relatedness determine gut microbiota similarity ( 84 , 85 ). Similarly, effects of the social environment on microbiota composition were found in chimpanzees and wild baboons when controlled for diet and genetic relatedness ( 22 , 86 ). Throughout the two-year study period, consistent taxa were identified in different age classes, with Helicobacter enriched in juvenile and Desulfovibrio enriched in older adult marmosets ( Supplementary Figure 4c and d ). Consistent with previous aging studies in humans and other primates, a higher relative abundance of Desulfovibrio and Bilophila was observed in the older adult marmosets ( 87 , 88 ). Similar enrichment of these taxa has been observed in aging mice ( 89 ). Additionally, aging in mice is linked to an increase in taurine-conjugated bile acids ( 90 , 91 ). Notably, marmosets, like mice, exclusively conjugate bile acids with taurine ( 92 ). However, the effect of aging on taurine-conjugated bile acids in marmosets remains unclear. The enrichment of Helicobacter was previously reported in crab-eating infant macaques ( 87 ). While some Helicobacter species/strains are pathogenic, both pathogenic and non-pathogenic Helicobacter strains may be present in the intestinal tract ( 93 , 94 ). For instance, Helicobacter macacae was enriched in rhesus macaque infants (< 8 month-old) without diarrhea symptoms, and its abundance was reduced with the maturation of macaques ( 95 ). Thus, the enrichment of Helicobacter in juvenile marmosets may not be harmful, and its role remains to be elucidated. Personality traits were also significantly linked with the beta diversity of gut microbiota in common marmosets. Specifically, Megasphaera was enriched in marmosets scoring higher on Exploration, whereas Desulfovibrio was enriched in more Avoidant-scoring marmosets ( Figure 3a and b ). Similar to our results, in a study of older human adults, Megasphaera was significantly associated with Extraversion, whereas Desulfovibrio was significantly associated with depression and Neuroticism ( 96 ). Additionally, dsrB gene amplicon sequencing results confirmed that Desulfovibrio was enriched in the Avoidance group. Conversely, an uncultured SRB ( dsrB OTU_1) was more abundant in the more explorative than in avoidant marmosets. Furthermore, Bilophila had a higher relative abundance in marmosets scoring high compared to marmosets scoring low on Stress/Activity. The relative abundance of Desulfovibrio is negatively correlated with the fecal sulfate concentration, suggesting the potential metabolism of sulfate by Desulfovibrio . UBA1819, a member of the Ruminococcaceae family which is known for producing SCFAs and being closely related to anxiety-like behavior ( 97 ), also showed increased relative abundance in the marmosets showing higher Stress/Activity. These findings are consistent with previous studies in murine models, where an increase in Desulfovibrionaceae and Ruminococcaceae was observed under chronic or single prolonged stress ( 98 – 101 ). Yet, the role of those microbes under stress remains unknown. Bacteroides was consistently associated with the more avoidant marmosets using differential analysis or Maaslin2 ( Figure 3b , Supplementary Figure 5 ). Bacteroides species enriched in the gut microbiome from major depressive disorder patients were shown to impact the susceptibility to depressive behavior. Notably, Bacteroides fragilis , Bacteroides uniformis , and Bacteroides caccae had a negative impact, while Bacteroides ovatus did not have a negative impact ( 102 ). In conclusion, this study provides the first insights into the factors associated with gut microbiota variability in captive common marmosets under the same dietary regime. The findings underscore the significant influence of social and environmental factors on the gut microbiome, surpassing the effects of genetic relatedness ( 103 ). Furthermore, this study is the first to establish the associations between personality traits and gut microbiota composition in a neotropical primate species. Our results revealed associations between specific microbial taxa and personality traits. However, further targeted research is needed to identify the mechanisms through which these gut microbes may influence personality traits in both captive and wild common marmosets, and other non-human primate species. Author contributions HY, VŠ, TB, and AL conceived the study, with help from BTH. HY collected the fecal samples and performed the microbial analysis. VŠ performed the behavioral experiments and interpreted the data. HY and VŠ wrote the article, with help from AL. CWH, PP, JS, and BH contributed to the bioinformatic analyses. All authors read, revised, and approved the manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Information Download figure Open in new tab Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure S1. Microbial composition of common marmosets in 2017 (n=123) and 2019 (n=102) at phylum- ( a ), family- ( b ), and genus- ( c ) levels. Each column represents one sample. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure S2. Microbial composition and alpha diversity in different family, age class, sex, and breeding status groups in 2019. Averaged relative abundances at the gewnus level showed significant differences associated with family group, age class, sex, and breeding status (upper panel). No significant differences were observed in alpha diversity between different family, age class, sex, and breeding status groups (lower panel). Shannon’s diversity was compared using Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparison test or t-test . Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure S3. Differences in gut microbiota similarity within age class, breeding status, and sex. GUniFrac distances between group members in different breeding statuses ( a ), age classes ( b ), and sex ( c ). Ad, adult; Juv, juvenile; f, female; m, male. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure S4. Differential genera between social group, age class, sex, and breeding status groups in 2017 and 2019. Differential taxa were identified at the genus level based on the random forest algorithm. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure S5. Associations between personality scores and gut microbiota composition at the genus level. Correlations between genus abundances and personality scores for common marmosets. Two taxa with the lowest p values from each personality trait were shown. Family names were displayed when the taxa were unclassified at the genus level. p < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05. Acknowledgments We thank Alexandra Bohmann and the animal-keeping team for animal care, the staff of the Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna for performing amplicon sequencing, and Thomas Rattei and his team for maintaining and providing access to the Life Science Compute Cluster (LISC, University of Vienna). This research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [grant DOI 10.55776/I2320, 10.55776/DOC69, and 10.55776/COE7] and the China Scholarship Council (Ph.D. fellowship grant No. 201606850092 to H.Y.). For open access purposes, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. Reference 1. ↵ Martin AM , Sun EW , Rogers GB , Keating DJ . 2019 . The Influence of the Gut Microbiome on Host Metabolism Through the Regulation of Gut Hormone Release . Front Physiol 10 : 428 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Levy M , Blacher E , Elinav E . 2017 . Microbiome, metabolites and host immunity . Curr Opin Microbiol 35 : 8 – 15 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Bioque M , González-Rodríguez A , Garcia-Rizo C , Cobo J , Monreal JA , Usall J , Soria V , PNECAT Group , Labad J . 2021 . Targeting the microbiome-gut-brain axis for improving cognition in schizophrenia and major mood disorders: A narrative review . Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 105 : 110130 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Conway J , A Duggal N . 2021 . Ageing of the gut microbiome: Potential influences on immune senescence and inflammageing . Ageing Res Rev 68 : 101323 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. Parizadeh M , Arrieta M-C . 2023 . The global human gut microbiome: genes, lifestyles, and diet . Trends Mol Med 29 : 789 – 801 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. Anthoulaki X , Oikonomou E , Bothou A , Papanikolopoulou S , Nikolettos K , Damaskos C , Garbis N , Kyriakou D , Nalbanti T , Iatrakis G , Nikolettos N , Tsikouras P . 2023 . Comparison of Gut Microbiome in Neonates Born by Caesarean Section and Vaginal Seeding with Gut Microbiomes of Neonates Born by Caesarean Section Without Vaginal Seeding and Neonates Born by Vaginal Delivery . Mater Sociomed 35 : 234 – 243 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Kumar G , Bhadury P . 2023 . Exploring the influences of geographical variation on sequence signatures in the human gut microbiome . J Genet 102 . 8. ↵ Marini RP , Wachtman LM , Tardif SD , Mansfield K , Fox JG . 2018 . The Common Marmoset in Captivity and Biomedical Research . Academic Press . 9. ↵ Schiel N , Souto A . 2017 . The common marmoset: An overview of its natural history, ecology and behavior . Dev Neurobiol 77 : 244 – 262 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Malukiewicz J , Boere V , de Oliveira MAB , D’arc M , Ferreira JVA , French J , Housman G , de Souza CI , Jerusalinsky L , R de Melo F , M Valença-Montenegro M , Moreira SB , de Oliveira E Silva I , Pacheco FS , Rogers J , Pissinatti A , Del Rosario RCH , Ross C , Ruiz-Miranda CR , Pereira LCM , Schiel N , de Fátima Rodrigues da Silva F, Souto A , Šlipogor V , Tardif S. 2020 . An Introduction to the Callithrix Genus and Overview of Recent Advances in Marmoset Research . ILAR J 61 : 110 – 138 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Saito A . 2015 . The marmoset as a model for the study of primate parental behavior . Neurosci Res 93 : 99 – 109 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Sheh A . 2020 . The Gastrointestinal Microbiota of the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) . ILAR J 61 : 188 – 198 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Sheh A , Artim SC , Burns MA , Molina-Mora JA , Lee MA , Dzink-Fox J , Muthupalani S , Fox JG . 2022 . Analysis of gut microbiome profiles in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in health and intestinal disease . Sci Rep 12 : 4430 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Shigeno Y , Toyama M , Nakamura M , Niimi K , Takahashi E , Benno Y . 2018 . Comparison of gut microbiota composition between laboratory-bred marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) with chronic diarrhea and healthy animals using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis . Microbiol Immunol 62 : 702 – 710 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Sheh A , Artim SC , Burns MA , Molina-Mora JA , Lee MA , Dzink-Fox J , Muthupalani S , Fox JG . 2022 . Alterations in common marmoset gut microbiome associated with duodenal strictures . Sci Rep 12 : 5277 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Davidson GL , Cooke AC , Johnson CN , Quinn JL . 2018 . The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour . Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 373 . 17. Kim H-N , Yun Y , Ryu S , Chang Y , Kwon M-J , Cho J , Shin H , Kim H-L . 2018 . Correlation between gut microbiota and personality in adults: A cross-sectional study . Brain Behav Immun 69 : 374 – 385 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Johnson KV-A . 2020 . Gut microbiome composition and diversity are related to human personality traits . Hum Microb J 15 :None. 19. ↵ Imran R , Khan S. 2023 . Dysregulation of gut microbiota composition in individuals with personality disorders: A systemic review and meta-analysis . medRxiv . 20. ↵ Lee S-H , Yoon S-H , Jung Y , Kim N , Min U , Chun J , Choi I . 2020 . Emotional well-being and gut microbiome profiles by enterotype . Sci Rep 10 : 20736 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 21. ↵ Ardeshir A , Narayan NR , Méndez-Lagares G , Lu D , Rauch M , Huang Y , Van Rompay KKA , Lynch SV , Hartigan-O’Connor DJ. 2014 . Breast-fed and bottle-fed infant rhesus macaques develop distinct gut microbiotas and immune systems . Sci Transl Med 6 : 252r a120 . OpenUrl 22. ↵ Tung J , Barreiro LB , Burns MB , Grenier J-C , Lynch J , Grieneisen LE , Altmann J , Alberts SC , Blekhman R , Archie EA . 2015 . Social networks predict gut microbiome composition in wild baboons . Elife 4 . 23. ↵ Johnson KV-A , Watson KK , Dunbar RIM , Burnet PWJ . 2022 . Sociability in a non-captive macaque population is associated with beneficial gut bacteria . Front Microbiol 13 : 1032495 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Sumich A , Heym N , Lenzoni S , Hunter K . 2022 . Gut microbiome-brain axis and inflammation in temperament, personality and psychopathology . Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 44 : 101101 . OpenUrl CrossRef 25. Rangraze I , Khan S. 2023 . Dysregulation of gut microbiota composition in individuals with personality disorders: A systemic review and meta-analysis . bioRxiv . 26. ↵ Fan X , Zang T , Liu J , Wu N , Dai J , Bai J , Liu Y . 2023 . Changes in the gut microbiome in the first two years of life predicted the temperament in toddlers . J Affect Disord 333 : 342 – 352 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Réale D , Reader SM , Sol D , McDougall PT , Dingemanse NJ . 2007 . Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution . Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 82 : 291 – 318 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Sih A , Bell AM . 2008 . Insights for Behavioral Ecology from Behavioral Syndromes . Adv Stud Behav 38 : 227 – 281 . OpenUrl CrossRef 29. ↵ Xia M , Xia Y , Sun Y , Wang J , Lu J , Wang X , Xia D , Xu X , Sun B . 2024 . Gut microbiome is associated with personality traits of free-ranging Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana) . Front Microbiol 15 : 1381372 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Finnegan PM , Garber PA , McKenney AC , Bicca-Marques JC , De la Fuente MF , Abreu F , Souto A , Schiel N , Amato KR , Mallott EK. 2024 . Group membership, not diet, structures the composition and functional potential of the gut microbiome in a wild primate . mSphere e 0023324 . 31. ↵ Šlipogor V , Gunhold-de Oliveira T , Tadić Z , Massen JJM , Bugnyar T. 2016 . Consistent inter-individual differences in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in Boldness-Shyness, Stress-Activity, and Exploration-Avoidance . Am J Primatol 78 : 961 – 973 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Šlipogor V , Massen JJM , Schiel N , Souto A , Bugnyar T . 2021 . Temporal consistency and ecological validity of personality structure in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): A unifying field and laboratory approach . Am J Primatol 83 : e23229 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Singh SB , Lin HC . 2015 . Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract . Microorganisms 3 : 866 – 889 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ Ritz NL , Burnett BJ , Setty P , Reinhart KM , Wilson MR , Alcock J , Singh SB , Barton LL , Lin HC . 2016 . Sulfate-reducing bacteria impairs working memory in mice . Physiol Behav 157 : 281 – 287 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. Kilburn KH , Warshaw RH . 1995 . Hydrogen sulfide and reduced-sulfur gases adversely affect neurophysiological functions . Toxicol Ind Health 11 : 185 – 197 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 36. ↵ Figliuolo VR , Dos Santos LM , Abalo A , Nanini H , Santos A , Brittes NM , Bernardazzi C , de Souza HSP , Vieira LQ , Coutinho-Silva R , Coutinho CMLM. 2017 . Sulfate-reducing bacteria stimulate gut immune responses and contribute to inflammation in experimental colitis . Life Sci 189 : 29 – 38 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 37. ↵ Hanson BT , Dimitri Kits K , Löffler J , Burrichter AG , Fiedler A , Denger K , Frommeyer B , Herbold CW , Rattei T , Karcher N , Segata N , Schleheck D , Loy A . 2021 . Sulfoquinovose is a select nutrient of prominent bacteria and a source of hydrogen sulfide in the human gut . ISME J 15 : 2779 – 2791 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Ye H , Borusak S , Eberl C , Krasenbrink J , Weiss AS , Chen S-C , Hanson BT , Hausmann B , Herbold CW , Pristner M , Zwirzitz B , Warth B , Pjevac P , Schleheck D , Stecher B , Loy A . 2023 . Ecophysiology and interactions of a taurine-respiring bacterium in the mouse gut . Nat Commun 14 : 5533 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Ritz N . 2014 . THE EFFECTS OF INTESTINAL SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIA ON COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR AND INTESTINAL TRANSIT IN MICE . University of New Mexico . 40. ↵ Tu F , Li J , Wang J , Li Q , Chu W . 2016 . Hydrogen sulfide protects against cognitive impairment induced by hepatic ischemia and reperfusion via attenuating neuroinflammation . Exp Biol Med 241 : 636 – 643 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 41. ↵ Li X , Zhuang Y-Y , Wu L , Xie M , Gu H-F , Wang B , Tang X-Q . 2020 . Hydrogen Sulfide Ameliorates Cognitive Dysfunction in Formaldehyde-Exposed Rats: Involvement in the Upregulation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor . Neuropsychobiology 79 : 119 – 130 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Walker A , Schmitt-Kopplin P . 2021 . The role of fecal sulfur metabolome in inflammatory bowel diseases . Int J Med Microbiol 311 : 151513 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 43. ↵ Lin H , Yu Y , Zhu L , Lai N , Zhang L , Guo Y , Lin X , Yang D , Ren N , Zhu Z , Dong Q . 2023 . Implications of hydrogen sulfide in colorectal cancer: Mechanistic insights and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies . Redox Biol 59 : 102601 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 44. ↵ Šlipogor V , Graf C , Massen JJM , Bugnyar T . 2022 . Personality and social environment predict cognitive performance in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) . Sci Rep 12 : 6702 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 45. ↵ Rowe N . 1996 . The pictorial guide to the living primates . (No Title) doi: 10.5860/choice.35-2112 . OpenUrl CrossRef 46. ↵ Griffiths RI , Whiteley AS , O’Donnell AG , Bailey MJ . 2000 . Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition . Appl Environ Microbiol 66 : 5488 – 5491 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 47. ↵ Herlemann DP , Labrenz M , Jürgens K , Bertilsson S , Waniek JJ , Andersson AF . 2011 . Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea . ISME J 5 : 1571 – 1579 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 48. ↵ Pelikan C , Herbold CW , Hausmann B , Müller AL , Pester M , Loy A . 2016 . Diversity analysis of sulfite- and sulfate-reducing microorganisms by multiplex dsrA and dsrB amplicon sequencing using new primers and mock community-optimized bioinformatics . Environ Microbiol 18 : 2994 – 3009 . OpenUrl CrossRef 49. ↵ Pjevac P , Hausmann B , Schwarz J , Kohl G , Herbold CW , Loy A , Berry D . 2021 . An Economical and Flexible Dual Barcoding, Two-Step PCR Approach for Highly Multiplexed Amplicon Sequencing . Front Microbiol 12 : 669776 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ Callahan BJ , Sankaran K , Fukuyama JA , McMurdie PJ , Holmes SP . 2016 . Bioconductor Workflow for Microbiome Data Analysis: from raw reads to community analyses . F1000Research 5 : 1492 . 51. ↵ Quast C , Pruesse E , Yilmaz P , Gerken J , Schweer T , Yarza P , Peplies J , Glöckner FO . 2013 . The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools . Nucleic Acids Res 41 : D590 – 6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 52. ↵ Edgar RC . 2013 . UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads . Nat Methods 10 : 996 – 998 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 53. ↵ Müller AL , Kjeldsen KU , Rattei T , Pester M , Loy A . 2015 . Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases . ISME J 9 : 1152 – 1165 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. ↵ McMurdie PJ , Holmes S . 2013 . phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data . PLoS One 8 : e61217 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Liu C , Cui Y , Li X , Yao M . 2021 . microeco: an R package for data mining in microbial community ecology . FEMS Microbiol Ecol 97 . 56. ↵ Beck D , Foster JA . 2014 . Machine learning techniques accurately classify microbial communities by bacterial vaginosis characteristics . PLoS One 9 : e87830 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 57. ↵ Yatsunenko T , Rey FE , Manary MJ , Trehan I , Dominguez-Bello MG , Contreras M , Magris M , Hidalgo G , Baldassano RN , Anokhin AP , Heath AC , Warner B , Reeder J , Kuczynski J , Caporaso JG , Lozupone CA , Lauber C , Clemente JC , Knights D , Knight R , Gordon JI . 2012 . Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography . Nature 486 : 222 – 227 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 58. ↵ Bates D , Mächler M , Bolker B , Walker S . 2015 . Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 . J Stat Softw 67 : 1 – 48 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 59. ↵ Barr DJ , Levy R , Scheepers C , Tily HJ . 2013 . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal . J Mem Lang 68 . 60. ↵ Barton K . 2009 . MuMIn : multi-model inference , R package version 0 . 12 .0. OpenUrl 61. ↵ Chen L , Reeve J , Zhang L , Huang S , Wang X , Chen J . 2018 . GMPR: A robust normalization method for zero-inflated count data with application to microbiome sequencing data . PeerJ 6 : e4600 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 62. ↵ Wright ES . 2016 . Using DECIPHER v2. 0 to analyze big biological sequence data in R. R J 8 . 63. ↵ Schliep KP . 2011 . phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R . Bioinformatics 27 : 592 – 593 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 64. ↵ Kembel SW , Cowan PD , Helmus MR , Cornwell WK , Morlon H , Ackerly DD , Blomberg SP , Webb CO . 2010 . Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology . Bioinformatics 26 : 1463 – 1464 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 65. ↵ Chen J , Bittinger K , Charlson ES , Hoffmann C , Lewis J , Wu GD , Collman RG , Bushman FD , Li H . 2012 . Associating microbiome composition with environmental covariates using generalized UniFrac distances . Bioinformatics 28 : 2106 – 2113 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 66. ↵ Sokal RR , James Rohlf F . 1969 . Biometry; the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research . W. H. Freeman . 67. ↵ Mallick H , Rahnavard A , McIver LJ , Ma S , Zhang Y , Nguyen LH , Tickle TL , Weingart G , Ren B , Schwager EH , Chatterjee S , Thompson KN , Wilkinson JE , Subramanian A , Lu Y , Waldron L , Paulson JN , Franzosa EA , Bravo HC , Huttenhower C . 2021 . Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies . PLoS Comput Biol 17 : e1009442 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 68. ↵ Diao M , Dyksma S , Koeksoy E , Ngugi DK , Anantharaman K , Loy A , Pester M . 2023 . Global diversity and inferred ecophysiology of microorganisms with the potential for dissimilatory sulfate/sulfite reduction . FEMS Microbiol Rev 47 . 69. ↵ Katoh K , Misawa K , Kuma K-I , Miyata T . 2002 . MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform . Nucleic Acids Res 30 : 3059 – 3066 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 70. ↵ Capella-Gutiérrez S , Silla-Martínez JM , Gabaldón T . 2009 . trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses . Bioinformatics 25 : 1972 – 1973 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 71. ↵ Hoang DT , Chernomor O , von Haeseler A , Minh BQ , Vinh LS. 2018 . UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation . Mol Biol Evol 35 : 518 – 522 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 72. Minh BQ , Schmidt HA , Chernomor O , Schrempf D , Woodhams MD , von Haeseler A , Lanfear R. 2020 . IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era . Mol Biol Evol 37 : 1530 – 1534 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ Kalyaanamoorthy S , Minh BQ , Wong TKF , von Haeseler A , Jermiin LS. 2017 . ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates . Nat Methods 14 : 587 – 589 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 74. ↵ Letunic I , Bork P . 2024 . Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool . Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 . OpenUrl CrossRef 75. ↵ Roguet A , Eren AM , Newton RJ , McLellan SL . 2018 . Fecal source identification using random forest . Microbiome 6 : 185 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 76. ↵ Rajilić-Stojanović M , de Vos WM. 2014 . The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota . FEMS Microbiol Rev 38 : 996 – 1047 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 77. ↵ Loubinoux J , Bronowicki J-P , Pereira IAC , Mougenel J-L , Faou AE . 2002 . Sulfate-reducing bacteria in human feces and their association with inflammatory bowel diseases . FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40 : 107 – 112 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 78. ↵ Burrichter AG , Dörr S , Bergmann P , Haiß S , Keller A , Fournier C , Franchini P , Isono E , Schleheck D . 2021 . Bacterial microcompartments for isethionate desulfonation in the taurine-degrading human-gut bacterium Bilophila wadsworthia . BMC Microbiol 21 : 340 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 79. ↵ Nakamura N , Leigh SR , Mackie RI , Gaskins HR . 2009 . Microbial community analysis of rectal methanogens and sulfate reducing bacteria in two non-human primate species . J Med Primatol 38 : 360 – 370 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 80. ↵ Nakamura N , Amato KR , Garber P , Estrada A , Mackie RI , Gaskins HR . 2011 . Analysis of the hydrogenotrophic microbiota of wild and captive black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) in palenque national park, Mexico . Am J Primatol 73 : 909 – 919 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 81. ↵ Shkoporov AN , Efimov BA , Kondova I , Ouwerling B , Chaplin AV , Shcherbakova VA , Langermans JAM . 2016 . Peptococcus simiae sp. nov., isolated from rhesus macaque faeces and emended description of the genus Peptococcus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66 : 5187 – 5191 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 82. ↵ Duszka K . 2022 . Versatile Triad Alliance: Bile Acid, Taurine and Microbiota . Cells 11 . 83. ↵ Go Y-M , Liang Y , Uppal K , Soltow QA , Promislow DEL , Wachtman LM , Jones DP . 2016 . Correction: Metabolic Characterization of the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) . PLoS One 11 : e0147880 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 84. ↵ Burns AR , Miller E , Agarwal M , Rolig AS , Milligan-Myhre K , Seredick S , Guillemin K , Bohannan BJM . 2017 . Interhost dispersal alters microbiome assembly and can overwhelm host innate immunity in an experimental zebrafish model . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114 : 11181 – 11186 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 85. ↵ Bensch HM , Lundin D , Tolf C , Waldenström J , Zöttl M . 2023 . Environmental effects rather than relatedness determine gut microbiome similarity in a social mammal . J Evol Biol 36 : 1753 – 1760 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 86. ↵ Moeller AH , Foerster S , Wilson ML , Pusey AE , Hahn BH , Ochman H . 2016 . Social behavior shapes the chimpanzee pan-microbiome . Sci Adv 2 : e1500997 . OpenUrl FREE Full Text 87. ↵ Wei Z-Y , Rao J-H , Tang M-T , Zhao G-A , Li Q-C , Wu L-M , Liu S-Q , Li B-H , Xiao B-Q , Liu X-Y , Chen J-H . 2022 . Characterization of Changes and Driver Microbes in Gut Microbiota During Healthy Aging Using A Captive Monkey Model . Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 20 : 350 – 365 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 88. ↵ Ghosh TS , Shanahan F , O’Toole PW . 2022 . The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing . Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 19 : 565 – 584 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 89. ↵ Shenghua P , Ziqin Z , Shuyu T , Huixia Z , Xianglu R , Jiao G . 2020 . An integrated fecal microbiome and metabolome in the aged mice reveal anti-aging effects from the intestines and biochemical mechanism of FuFang zhenshu TiaoZhi(FTZ) . Biomed Pharmacother 121 : 109421 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 90. ↵ Ma J , Hong Y , Zheng N , Xie G , Lyu Y , Gu Y , Xi C , Chen L , Wu G , Li Y , Tao X , Zhong J , Huang Z , Wu W , Yuan L , Lin M , Lu X , Zhang W , Jia W , Sheng L , Li H . 2020 . Gut microbiota remodeling reverses aging-associated inflammation and dysregulation of systemic bile acid homeostasis in mice sex-specifically . Gut Microbes 11 : 1450 – 1474 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 91. ↵ Lee G , Lee H , Hong J , Lee SH , Jung BH . 2016 . Quantitative profiling of bile acids in rat bile using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-orbitrap mass spectrometry: Alteration of the bile acid composition with aging . J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1031 : 37 – 49 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 92. ↵ Kirilenko BM , Hagey LR , Barnes S , Falany CN , Hiller M . 2019 . Evolutionary Analysis of Bile Acid-Conjugating Enzymes Reveals a Complex Duplication and Reciprocal Loss History . Genome Biol Evol 11 : 3256 – 3268 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 93. ↵ Marini RP , Muthupalani S , Shen Z , Buckley EM , Alvarado C , Taylor NS , Dewhirst FE , Whary MT , Patterson MM , Fox JG . 2010 . Persistent infection of rhesus monkeys with “Helicobacter macacae” and its isolation from an animal with intestinal adenocarcinoma . J Med Microbiol 59 : 961 – 969 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 94. ↵ Baele M , Pasmans F , Flahou B , Chiers K , Ducatelle R , Haesebrouck F . 2009 . Non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacters detected in the stomach of humans comprise several naturally occurring Helicobacter species in animals . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 55 : 306 – 313 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 95. ↵ Rhoades N , Barr T , Hendrickson S , Prongay K , Haertel A , Gill L , Garzel L , Whiteson K , Slifka M , Messaoudi I . 2019 . Maturation of the infant rhesus macaque gut microbiome and its role in the development of diarrheal disease . Genome Biol 20 : 173 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 96. ↵ Renson A , Kasselman LJ , Dowd JB , Waldron L , Jones HE , Herd P . 2020 . Gut bacterial taxonomic abundances vary with cognition, personality, and mood in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study . Brain Behav Immun Health 9 : 100155 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 97. ↵ Gacias M , Gaspari S , Santos P-MG , Tamburini S , Andrade M , Zhang F , Shen N , Tolstikov V , Kiebish MA , Dupree JL , Zachariou V , Clemente JC , Casaccia P . 2016 . Microbiota-driven transcriptional changes in prefrontal cortex override genetic differences in social behavior . Elife 5 . 98. ↵ Ma C , Yuan D , Renaud SJ , Zhou T , Yang F , Liou Y , Qiu X , Zhou L , Guo Y . 2022 . Chaihu-shugan-san alleviates depression-like behavior in mice exposed to chronic unpredictable stress by altering the gut microbiota and levels of the bile acids hyocholic acid and 7-ketoDCA . Front Pharmacol 13 : 1040591 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 99. Song X , Wang W , Ding S , Liu X , Wang Y , Ma H . 2021 . Puerarin ameliorates depression-like behaviors of with chronic unpredictable mild stress mice by remodeling their gut microbiota . J Affect Disord 290 : 353 – 363 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 100. Wu J , Li J , Gaurav C , Muhammad U , Chen Y , Li X , Chen J , Wang Z . 2021 . CUMS and dexamethasone induce depression-like phenotypes in mice by differentially altering gut microbiota and triggering macroglia activation . Gen Psychiatr 34 : e100529 . OpenUrl CrossRef 101. ↵ Oh NS , Joung JY , Lee JY , Song JG , Oh S , Kim Y , Kim HW , Kim SH . 2020 . Glycated milk protein fermented with Lactobacillus rhamnosus ameliorates the cognitive health of mice under mild-stress condition . Gut Microbes 11 : 1643 – 1661 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 102. ↵ Zhang Y , Fan Q , Hou Y , Zhang X , Yin Z , Cai X , Wei W , Wang J , He D , Wang G , Yuan Y , Hao H , Zheng X . 2022 . Bacteroides species differentially modulate depression-like behavior via gut-brain metabolic signaling . Brain Behav Immun 102 : 11 – 22 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 103. ↵ Rothschild D , Weissbrod O , Barkan E , Kurilshikov A , Korem T , Zeevi D , Costea PI , Godneva A , Kalka IN , Bar N , Shilo S , Lador D , Vila AV , Zmora N , Pevsner-Fischer M , Israeli D , Kosower N , Malka G , Wolf BC , Avnit-Sagi T , Lotan-Pompan M , Weinberger A , Halpern Z , Carmi S , Fu J , Wijmenga C , Zhernakova A , Elinav E , Segal E . 2018 . Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota . Nature 555 : 210 – 215 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 13, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Associations between gut microbiota and personality traits: insights from a captive common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) colony Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Associations between gut microbiota and personality traits: insights from a captive common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ) colony Huimin Ye , Vedrana Šlipogor , Buck T. Hanson , Joana Séneca , Bela Hausmann , Craig W. Herbold , Petra Pjevac , Thomas Bugnyar , Alexander Loy bioRxiv 2025.02.12.637913; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.12.637913 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Associations between gut microbiota and personality traits: insights from a captive common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ) colony Huimin Ye , Vedrana Šlipogor , Buck T. Hanson , Joana Séneca , Bela Hausmann , Craig W. Herbold , Petra Pjevac , Thomas Bugnyar , Alexander Loy bioRxiv 2025.02.12.637913; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.12.637913 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Microbiology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7635) Biochemistry (17697) Bioengineering (13894) Bioinformatics (41951) Biophysics (21455) Cancer Biology (18593) Cell Biology (25509) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13380) Ecology (19903) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24322) Genetics (15611) Genomics (22509) Immunology (17737) Microbiology (40398) Molecular Biology (17183) Neuroscience (88619) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2833) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) Physiology (7644) Plant Biology (15158) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4296) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)