Experimental rapid and small-scale ecological population divergence in the absence of current natural selection

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,669 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Adaptive divergence has long been a core topic in the field of evolutionary biology, with natural selection traditionally considered its only driver. Here we focus on the ability of matching habitat choice to generate population divergence and reproductive isolation. This alternative mechanism of divergence considers that individuals choose their habitats based on an evaluation of the ecological match between their phenotype and the available environments, which subsequently limits gene flow. To test this, we conducted experiments with captive zebra fiches equipped with transponder-tags and using transponder-operated bird feeders. We thereby created within a single aviary two areas with distinct resources, and the associated ecological traits that provided access to only one of the resources. We found that most zebra finches chose to breed in the same area as where they had access to their ecological resource, thereby creating population divergence in the absence of current natural selection on the ecological trait. This choice of breeding area indirectly resulted in assortative mating for the ecological trait. If the ecological trait were heritable, this assortative mating would carry the obtained divergence into the next generation. Our results experimentally confirm the predicted ability of matching habitat choice to drive rapid population divergence and limit maladaptive gene flow, especially at the small temporal and spatial scales where natural selection is unlikely to do so (here: one generation and one aviary). This might be increasingly relevant in a world where anthropogenic impacts create rapid environmental changes. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2GP64 Life Sciences adaptation, assortative mating, ecological divergence, habitat choice, matching habitat choice, natural selection, assortative mating, ecological divergence, habitat choice, matching habitat choice, natural selection Published: 2024-01-02 14:00 Last Updated: 2024-01-02 19:00 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and scripts used for analysis are available in the Zenodo repository doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10039728 and doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10039712 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00