Direct pathway enrichment prediction from histopathological whole slide images and comparison with gene expression mediated models

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,856 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Molecular profiling of tumours via RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) enables clinically actionable stratification but remains costly, tissue-intensive, and time-consuming. Recent advances in computational pathology suggest that routine H&E whole-slide images (WSIs) can be utilized to estimate transcriptomic states of cancer cells. Given the WSI-derived predictions of transcriptional signatures are noisy, their use for accurate biological interpretation faces challenges. On the other hand pathway enrichment analysis has been routinely used in describing biologically meaningful cellular states from noisy gene expression data and some studies have evaluated the ability of WSI-predicted gene expression profiles to reconstruct enriched pathways in experiments where the two data modalities were concurrently available. However, it remains unclear if a predictive model that is designed to predict enriched pathways directly from WSI samples would be better than the current approaches to do so by first predicting gene expressions. Here, we develop and evaluate these two complementary approaches for predicting pathway enrichment profiles from WSIs in TCGA Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) by training parallel models which predict pathway enrichment directly from image features and those which rely on predicted gene expression profiles, which is the current state-of-the-art. Our results suggest that under controlled experiments direct prediction of a selected pool of enriched pathways outperforms the models trained on predicting gene expression and then inferring enrichments on predicted gene expression values. These findings will be helpful in prioritizing the goals of predictive modeling of WSI images and improving diagnostic outcomes of cancer patients. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00