“It was up to me to be curious”: Perceptions and Experiences of Students with Intellectual Disability on Genetics and Health Education

“It was up to me to be curious”: Perceptions and Experiences of Students with Intellectual Disability on Genetics and Health Education | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article “It was up to me to be curious”: Perceptions and Experiences of Students with Intellectual Disability on Genetics and Health Education Iva Strnadová, Jennifer Hansen, Joanne Danker, Karen-Maia Jackaman, and 6 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5635751/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 23 Feb, 2026 Read the published version in European Journal of Human Genetics → Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract People with intellectual disability want to learn more about their health and genetics. They want to be empowered with the knowledge and skills to make informed health and genetic healthcare choices. Little is known about what high school students with intellectual disability learn about health, genetics or genetic healthcare. To address this gap, we conducted an inclusive qualitative research study in Australia. Fourteen Australian current and recently graduated students with intellectual disability participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis revealed four key themes: (i) Science, health and genetics education, (ii) Health rights, (iii) Education rights, (iv) Recommendations for improving genetic and health literacy. Students with intellectual disability reported they were not taught about genetics and health, making healthcare choices, and/or making life decisions at school. They felt this disadvantages and disempowers them in becoming informed healthcare consumers. They recommended that teachers should be supported with resources to deliver inclusive, person-centred and respectful lessons that inform decision-making about genetics, health and healthcare choices. Future research should focus on how best to upskill teachers to support students with intellectual disability for their future health choices in a respectful, supportive, student-centred and strengths-based way. This will help prepare young people with intellectual disability to navigate the healthcare system and be empowered partners in their own healthcare. The growth of such skills has been suggested as critical in inequities in healthcare access for people with intellectual disability, as well as improving healthcare experiences and outcomes. Health sciences/Health care/Public health Health sciences/Health care/Patient education health literacy genetic education healthcare choices intellectual disability genetics informed healthcare consumers. Figures Figure 1 INTRODUCTION People with intellectual disability experience premature mortality, more avoidable deaths and have poor healthcare experiences [ 1 , 2 ]. Recent studies identified challenges to acquiring health literacy, the ability to understand health information and apply it to make informed decisions about health and healthcare, as a key barrier to high quality healthcare for people with intellectual disability [ 3 ]. Clinical genetics is revolutionising our understanding of the causes of numerous conditions, including cancers, renal conditions, and many types of intellectual disability [ 4 ]. Genetic diagnosis can lead to better physical and mental health outcomes by providing more precise information to guide treatment and empowering patients about future health and reproduction [ 5 ]. However, people with intellectual disability may miss out on these opportunities due to inequitable and non-inclusive genetic healthcare [ 6 , 7 ]. Recent research shows that people with intellectual disability both want and have capacity to learn about their own genetics [ 8 , 9 ]. Genetic health literacy is defined as “sufficient knowledge and understanding of genetic principles for individuals to make decisions that sustain personal well-being and effective participation in social decisions on genetic issues” [ 10 ]. This can incorporate, for example, understanding potential advantages and disadvantages of genetic tests and gene-based therapies, and knowledge to make fully autonomous or shared genetic healthcare decisions. As genetics is integrated into healthcare, equitable access to support and education to develop genetic health literacy is needed for all members of society, with reasonable adjustments according to each individual’s learning and communication abilities [ 11 ]. Becoming an empowered genetic health ‘consumer’ requires education and support in two main areas: ‘functional’ or foundational genetic health literacy, including knowledge of genes, genetic inheritance patterns and genetic conditions; and growth of skills and confidence to identify and advocate for one’s own healthcare goals and psychosocial needs in relation to genetic healthcare. This requires knowledge of one’s healthcare rights and responsibilities and skills in self-advocacy and self-management [ 12 ]. This area has been described as encompassing ‘interactive’ and ‘critical’ health literacy [ 13 , 14 ]. In Australian schools, genetics-related content is predominately delivered in the Science syllabus [ 15 ]. The high school science curriculum can lay the foundations of genetic knowledge (e.g. DNA and inherited traits) to support the development of genetic health literacy [ 16 – 18 ]. The curriculum also contains content on how advances in technology can solve healthcare challenges and how people may use different ways of decision-making when deciding whether to apply new technologies to their own healthcare [ 18 ]. There is little research on how to best teach students with intellectual disability about health and healthcare, including self-advocacy and self-management generally, and genetics and genetic healthcare specifically. In a recent qualitative study we identified gaps in teachers’ knowledge of how to teach students with intellectual disability about genetics and health literacy in an accessible way, and a lack of resources to help teachers apply evidence-based practices in health and genetic education [ 19 ]. This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to genetics and health education for high school students with intellectual disability, from the students’ perspective. To date, no study has focused on education in genetics, health, and health literacy from the point of view of students with intellectual disability. The research question guiding this study was: What are students’ perceptions and experiences of high school education relevant to health and genetics? METHODS This was an inclusive qualitative research study. In inclusive research, people with disability are not just participants but also co-creators of knowledge [ 20 ]. Inclusive research involves co-production, a collaborative process where all stakeholders are involved in knowledge creation, fostering a shared community of practice [ 21 ]. All study materials, including participant information statement and consent forms (PISCF) were available in Standard and Easy Read English. The study was approved by UNSW Sydney’s Human Research and Ethics Committee (HC210342). Participants Individuals aged 12–28 years with intellectual disability and living in Australia were recruited through social media channels, including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn, professional networks, parental networks, and grassroots organisations (e.g., self-advocacy organisations). A social media flyer included an introduction to genetics and health taught at school, the study aim, inclusion criteria and contact details. Interviews The semi-structured interview protocol was co-developed by a multidisciplinary team including researchers with expertise in special education and disability studies, a clinical geneticist, and co-researchers with intellectual disability. Interviews were conducted in person or online via Zoom. Consent was provided by participants using an accessible Easy Read PISCF, and guardian consent was provided for participants of school age. At the interview, the authors obtained consent from participants and assured them of their rights, stating they were not obligated to participate and could withdraw at any time without consequences. Participants were given pseudonyms for anonymity. Data Analysis Interviews were audio-recorded with the participants’ permission. Data were transcribed verbatim, deidentified, and analysed using inductive content analysis [ 22 ]. All interviews were open coded by JH. The first interview was independently open coded by JH and IS, and any disagreements resolved by JD. JH clustered the codes into categories which were then discussed with IS, and any disagreements resolved through discussion with JD to ensure validity and reliability [ 23 ]. The categories were clustered into sub-themes, and sub-themes into themes capturing data relevant to the research question and representing the meaning and response within the dataset [ 24 ]. IS and JD undertook researcher triangulation, overseeing each stage of the analysis to ensure credibility [ 25 ]. Experts in genetics and intellectual disability contributed to the validation. [ 25 ] RESULTS Participants Three Australian high school students and 11 recently graduated young adults with intellectual disability participated (Table 1 ): seven males, five females and two non-binary participants, aged 12 to 28 years (average 24 years). Most participants attended public or Catholic schools with a mixture of mainstream or support classes. Interviews lasted from 8–73 minutes (average 34 minutes). Table 1 Participant demographic data Name (pseudonym) Age Gender Location (state) and type of school Sonny 25 Non-binary Public co-educational support unit (NSW) Lee 28 Non-binary Public co-educational mainstream and support classes (NSW) Andrew 24 Male Public co-educational support unit (NSW) Jasmine 20 Female Public co-educational support unit (NSW) Michael 25 Male Catholic mainstream single sex and support classes; public co-educational mainstream and support classes (NSW) Duncan 15 Male Catholic mainstream single sex and support classes (NSW) Rodney 25 Male Catholic mainstream single sex and support classes (NSW) Lucas 26 Male Catholic mainstream single sex and support classes (NSW) Gail 20 Female Public co-educational mainstream (NSW) Jazzy 25 Female Independent school for specific purposes (Victoria) Bobby 24 Male Public co-educational school for Specific Purposes (NSW) Imogen 28 Female Public mainstream co-educational and support classes (NSW) Abigail 13 Female Public mainstream co-educational and support classes (NSW) Milo 12 Male Public mainstream co-educational (NSW) NSW, New South Wales Inductive content analysis revealed four key themes (Fig. 1 ): (i) Science, health and genetics education, (ii) Health rights, (iii) Education rights, (iv) Recommendations for improving education to support genetic and health literacy. 1. Science, health and genetics education Participants commented on what was taught, how these topics were taught, and why they thought learning about these and related topics at school was important. 1.1 What was taught (scope) Participating students had varying accounts of what they learned in science. They mentioned a wide range of topics, such as the difference between living and non-living things, planets, and chemicals. In health they learnt about human anatomy, what humans need to survive, handwashing, and dental hygiene. Ten participants shared what they were taught about genes and genetic conditions, which was highly variable. Sonny explained they had learned about genes but not genetic contributions to eye and hair colour. Jazzy shared she had learned about genes and genetic conditions and connected it to something “health-wise”. She recalls being taught “there’s lots of genes in people” but that was not related to her health or that of others. However, she wondered about the connection between her genes and her own health and learning abilities “… I know there’s a disability in me, so obviously there’s something… a change”. Four participants stated they did not learn about genes or genetic conditions at school. Andrew said, “I’d never heard of it”, and only when he started working at a self-advocacy organisation “that’s when I started to find out”. Andrew’s experience was similar to Sonny’s, who learnt about connections between genes and disability when they accessed School Leaver Employment Supports and started to question their parents: “It was up to me to be curious”. 1.2 How it was taught Participating students identified several e nablers to learning about science, health and genetics. These included experiments, outdoor learning experiences, videos, and checklists. Lucas summarised how teachers could facilitate learning to ensure students experience success: “Teacher taught, then video taught, then sign taught [signs and symbols], and movie taught”, because this sequence of steps would encourage students to attempt tasks independently. Several barriers to learning were also identified. Six participants had experienced inaccessible lessons, including a lot of information to recall and process, or where scientific vocabulary was not explained so that two participants felt “stupid”. One participant found equipment difficult to use, and their understanding and engagement was hindered by lack of explanation. For genetic concepts, students identified some enablers. Lucas described how teachers used videos, diagrams, signage, charts and worksheets to explain about genes and genetic conditions. One video showed if your father has a heart attack or diabetes “… you have a chance of having that as well”. Barriers to learning about genetic concepts included lessons that used animal examples instead of humans, or where students were not taught about genetic concepts at all. 2. Health rights Participants shared their opinions about and experiences of healthcare, rights, and decision-making. 2.1 Students’ opinions about healthcare, rights, and decision-making Students shared their opinions about the importance of learning about healthcare rights and making informed decisions. Eight participants described learning about health and healthcare choices as fundamental. Andrew thought that school “failed” to teach students about healthcare choices or to provide information on how to be informed health consumers. He noted the importance of learning about health and healthcare choices at an early age to prepare for adulthood, and highlighted the need for more teacher training, and resources on how to teach students about health and healthcare choices. Sonny felt they had “no control” over their body and “your body is there for other people to look at”. Participants had been taught that doctors have authority, and to accept whatever healthcare professionals say. Both Gail and her mother reported she was not taught to ask questions of doctors or make decisions about taking medication. Andrew said schools should teach students about decision-making and choices as “… it’s important because you don’t want to go throughout adulthood always relying on the opinions of others”. He discussed how “we are our own individual selves” and “we have our right to be able to make decisions… according to our own needs”. Lee thought similarly, adding that not everyone has a support person throughout their whole life. Two participants wished decision-making had been taught at school. Andrew recommended students be taught how to say “no” when they are uncomfortable with the presented choices presented, while Sonny suggested schools could support students to gain more confidence and experience with decision-making, for example by providing ‘scripts’. 2.2 Students’ experiences of learning about healthcare, healthcare rights and decision-making Education on healthcare rights and decision-making was very limited. Sexual health and puberty were topics recalled by participants, but they reported varied and fragmented experiences. Only one participant, Andrew, reported being taught about consent, while Sonny recalled that lessons about romantic experiences focused on heterosexual relationships. Imogen learned about respectful behaviours in romantic relationships. Two participants described learning about sexual relationships and the use of contraception to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. Four participants had been taught about the menstrual cycle and sanitary options. Learning how to live healthily by eating well was highlighted by eight participants, whilst five participants mentioned keeping active. Two participants shared experiences of learning about mental health. Andrew had only been taught about severe depression; similarly, Sonny was only told about “extreme” mental health conditions in “very clinical” terms. Only one participant, Rodney, was taught how to take medications safely by always seeking medical advice. Sonny had learned about recreational drugs and how you should “never do drugs”. 3. Education rights Participants communicated the barriers they experienced to access quality education, lifelong learning opportunities, and dignity to pursue learning in a safe environment. 3.1 Lack of evidence-based practices and reasonable adjustments Many barriers to learning were identified by participants. Curiosity was discouraged, as indicated by Sonny, who was removed from a class for asking too many questions. Repetition of the same content over several years, copying teachers’ notes from the board, and inaccessible school exams also hindered students’ interest and engagement. Participants reported varying levels of support and reasonable adjustments. The lack of accessible and explicit instruction made it difficult for participants to complete tasks. Imogen and Abigail noted how discouraging it was when tasks were too hard or included too much reading. Being punished when they did not understand tasks was another barrier. Lee commented that insufficient time and support was provided: “they were always in a rush, and they never seem to care”. 3.2 Stigma, bullying and abuse Bullying was a “sad reality” in high school for half of the participants. Lucas said he wished school taught more effective ways of dealing with bullying. Bobby implemented the strategy taught at primary school in high school, which was saying “Stop it, I don’t like it” but found it was ineffective: “Me say stop, and me move away, but they keep following me”. Jazzy wished she was taught how to make complaints to teachers about bullying. Two participants shared how their traumatic high school experiences impacted them. Bobby highlighted that one of his teachers showed no understanding of students with disability, being “always mean”, raising her voice and calling students names. Sonny reflected on their experience of unhelpful reactions to disclosures of abuse. When linking their experience of abuse to the school curriculum, Sonny wished they had been taught about recognising and reporting abuse, and that teachers need more training and skills of how to teach recognising and reporting abuse. 4. Recommendations for improving education to support genetic and health literacy Students discussed why information about genetic conditions, health, and related topics of disability and neurodiversity should be taught at schools and made recommendations about who should be involved in teaching, how they would like to have received health and science education, and other topics related to health literacy that should be covered. 4.1 Why students should learn about genetics, health conditions, neurodiversity and disability in schools Four participants discussed why people should learn about genes and genetic conditions. Jazzy highlighted the importance of learning about these topics as people “… want to know more… about something that they’ve got inside of them”. Sonny thought that learning about genes and genetic conditions would encourage people to be “… a lot more accepting…” whilst Andrew highlighted that “… it gives people more of that understanding about the different types of disabilities… [and so they] … gain more compassion…” He noted “…there’s still a lot of stigma out there”. Jasmine wished her school taught about Down Syndrome, but preferred people to use the term Trisomy 21 rather than Down Syndrome “because that makes me upset”. Sonny noted they were never taught about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism at school. They wished they had and added that if autism continues to be a “taboo topic” in schools, people are going to associate neurodiversity with being “something bad”. 4.2 Who should do the teaching about science, genetics and health literacy Imogen suggested that experts, such as doctors, be part of science instruction. Others suggested nurses, genetic healthcare and education professionals should be involved, as well as those with lived experience who could provide co-education. Three participants described that teachers who understand students’ needs are significant enablers. Seven participants had access to teachers’ aides during lessons, with some positive experiences. Andrew said the teacher’s aide in his support class would break down tasks further than the subject teacher, and Sonny noted that support staff often had more knowledge of students’ reasonable adjustments than the subject teacher: “So the thing that stops learning is people who are not listening to the people [learning support staff] who knows these kids the best”. 4.3 How it should be taught Five participants gave examples of accessible ways to teach about genes and genetic conditions. All five suggested evidence-based practices, including visual supports and videos. Imogen suggested the GeneEQUAL Easy Read booklet about genes and genetic conditions as a resource for teachers [ 26 ]. 4.4 Beyond academics: students call for essential life skills Participants discussed the role of school in teaching them about decision-making and making choices more generally. Some participating students and young people were taught about decision-making in their daily lives, while others were not. Three young people wished they had been taught more about emotions and emotional regulation. Sonny wished they were taught how emotions work, and Andrew wanted to have learnt more about compassion and understanding. Sonny felt that schools need to teach about online information and social media more critically: “And schools have not kept up with any of that. That’s another reason why it doesn’t feel safe anymore”. DISCUSSION This study aimed to answer the research question: What are students’ perceptions and experiences of high school education relevant to health and genetics? The findings show participants received general education about sexual health and relationships, nutrition and physical activity, alcohol and illicit drug use, mental health and wellbeing, and occasionally about genes and genetic conditions. However, in general they did not receive information that linked clearly enough to their lives and supported them to make informed health decisions and be a partner in their own healthcare. Health literacy skills involve reading, writing, speaking, listening, using technology, networking, and skills associated with making requests, advocacy, and complaints [27]. The barriers that most participants experienced to developing and consolidating health literacy skills included too much reading and complex information, lack of accessible and explicit instruction, difficult instructions, and complex scientific vocabulary. Under the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Australian Government), teachers have a legal requirement to implement measures and actions to help students with disability access learning on the same basis as their peers without disability [28]. Poor health literacy is a significant public issue, as it hinders people’s ability to effectively communicate concerns, understand and follow health providers' instructions, and benefit from health services [29]. Such poor health literacy has been directly linked to poor healthcare outcomes, and neglect, abuse and trauma in the healthcare system [1, 30]. Given that information about health and health systems is taught in schools [31],there is an urgent need to review how best to teach relevant curriculum content and upskill teachers in respectful, supportive, and trauma-informed teaching. Participants recommended that explicit education about decision-making in general, and specifically about their own healthcare, should have been included in their school education [32]. If teachers are unaware of students’ needs and lack the professional development and resources to teach effective health literacy at schools, students are forced to rely on healthcare professionals, parents, carers, friends, and the media. However, our research and that of others clearly shows this does not happen consistently, due to multiple barriers including lack of time, resources and confidence of families and health professionals, as well as the assumption that people with intellectual disability lack the capacity to be partners in their healthcare [9, 12, 19, 33]. Without knowledge and skills, people are less likely to participate in making decisions about their healthcare and more likely to disengage from health screening and recommended therapies and lifestyle advice, which can be explicitly linked to higher rates of avoidable morbidities and death [34, 35]. The reality behind the school experience was a particularly disturbing theme. People with intellectual disability experience more abuse and violence than people without disability, with girls and women with intellectual disability experiencing higher rates of violence [1]. Being bullied, abused, and threatened are shared experiences of students with intellectual disability in education settings [36]. Globally, students with intellectual disability appear to be at higher risk of sexual abuse by peers or teacher/support staff [37].Teachers may need additional support or resources to help them take into consideration students’ experiences of abuse and violence and how these affect learning and engagement with genetic health and health-related education. A trauma-informed framework has been identified as a critical component in effective education for students with intellectual disability, as evidenced by its inclusion in a recent State Parliamentary enquiry [38]. The participants also highlighted specific qualities they wished were taught and modelled at school: patience, understanding and compassion. These qualities were also communicated in a study exploring the ‘dream school’ for people with intellectual disability [36] and highlighted by students with and without disability in a study about the culture of their school, inclusion, and the practices implemented to support all students [39]. This is the first study asking students with intellectual disability about their perceptions and experiences of high school health and genetics education. By enrolling participants across different school sectors and support settings, our study provides a breadth of high school experiences. A limitation of this research is the small number of participants, and limited geographic spread (all but one participant attended a school in the state of New South Wales in Australia). As a result, perceptions and experiences are not necessarily generalisable to all students, and future studies should explore how a broader representative sample could be included equitably, including students with higher support needs and those from regional, rural and remote areas of Australia. Implications for Future Research Future research conducted in other Australian states and territories and worldwide would capture broader perceptions and experiences of students and young people with intellectual disability. The principle of "Nothing about us without us", and the shift towards a more inclusive socio-ecological model of disability, emphasise the importance of involving and valuing the opinions of students and young people with intellectual disability in educational settings [40]. Through collaboration, respect and empowerment, students with intellectual disability can become informed health consumers in adulthood [41]. Further research is needed in Australia to explore appropriate evidence-based practices to teach students with intellectual disability about health and genetic concepts. Strategies evaluated by researchers and identified as effective in educational settings [42] can then assist students to successfully access complex concepts, which will help them better understand their role and responsibility as informed health consumers. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE Health literacy is considered a critical determinant of health [43]. Compared to the general population, people with intellectual disability experience more barriers to accessible health services and worse health outcomes [1, 2, 30]. Additionally, the experiences of people with intellectual disability are overlooked in health literacy literature [14, 44]. Students in this study wanted to learn more about health and genetics in ways that would enable them to become informed health consumers. They identified enablers such as teachers’ knowledge and consistent use of reasonable adjustments, greater understanding and compassion about their disability, and updated professional development for teachers to deliver health literacy skills in more meaningful and contextual ways. High schools have much to learn from the perceptions and experiences of students with intellectual disability. Our study participants recommended accessible, person-centred and respectful strategies for facilitating health and genetic health content to help prepare them for life-related decision-making and navigating the healthcare system. These recommendations included reasonable adjustments such as check lists, role play and using visual supports, which is a well-established evidence-based practice [45]. Based on their recommendations, we propose that training for educators and resources (for example lesson plans and multimedia resources) should be co-designed with people with intellectual disability and teachers, as well as other key stakeholders such as parents, using evidence-based approaches [19, 20]. These resources should focus on building foundational genetic and health literacy and skills and capability in shared decision making, self-management and self-advocacy. Such a package, especially if complemented by resources and training for healthcare professionals, has the potential to support more successful transitions from paediatric to adult health services, an acknowledged part of healthcare requiring urgent attention [12, 46]. Collaboration with experts such as genetic healthcare professionals is needed to ensure accurate information and the development of person-centered and trauma-informed resources and training [1, 30]. Lastly, this study highlights the importance of inclusive research in promoting visibility of people with intellectual disability. It helps to deconstruct ableism by valuing the lived experiences, opinions and contributions of people with intellectual disability as not only participants but as co-researchers [21]. We demonstrate how the voices and agency of students with intellectual disability, previously rarely elicited or heard, can be powerfully incorporated into much needed changes in healthcare policy and practice. Declarations DATA AVAILABIITY STATEMENT Deidentified data are available upon request. Additional data and materials such as data collection forms, data extraction and analysis templates can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the students and young people that participated in the study and the organisations and personnel which supported their recruitment. We acknowledge Sierra Angelina Willow for creating a visual abstract, Sarah Hayes for developing Figure 1, and Natalie Roberts for her expert support with submission of the manuscript. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualisation: IS, EP, JLR, KMJ, JH; Methodology: IS, BT, JH, JB, EP; Validation: JLR, SS, IS, EP, BT; Formal analysis: JH, JD, IS; Investigation: JH, JLR, IS; Writing – original draft: JH, EP, BT, IS; Writing – reviewing and editing: JH, IS, JD, KMJ, JLR, SS, JLS, JB, BT, EP; Supervision: IS, EP, BT, JD; Project administration: JH; Funding acquisition: IS, BT, JLR, EP, JLS FUNDING This study was funded by the University of New South Wales Sydney, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture. ETHICAL APPROVAL The study received ethics approval from UNSW Sydney’s Human Research and Ethics Committee (HC210342). COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. References Australian Government Royal Commission in Violence Abuse Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. Final Report - Volume 3, Nature and extent of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation. Available at: https://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/final-report-volume-3-nature-and-extent-violence-abuse-neglect-and-exploitation . Accessed 1 April 2024. 2023 Trollor J, Srasuebkul P, Xu H, Howlett S. Cause of death and potentially avoidable deaths in Australian adults with intellectual disability using retrospective linked data. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013489. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013489 Syurina EV, Brankovic I, Probst-Hensch N, Brand A. Genome-based health literacy: a new challenge for public health genomics. Public Health Genomics. 2011;14:201–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000324238 Savatt JM, Myers SM. Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:526779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.526779 Manickam K, McClain MR, Demmer LA, Biswas S, Kearney HM, Malinowski J, et al. Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23:2029–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01242-6 Ali A, Scior K, Ratti V, Strydom A, King M, Hassiotis A. Discrimination and other barriers to accessing health care: perspectives of patients with mild and moderate intellectual disability and their carers. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070855 Truesdale M, Brown M, Taggart L, Bradley A, Paterson D, Sirisena C, et al. Trauma-informed care: A qualitative study exploring the views and experiences of professionals in specialist health services for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;32:1437–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12634 Strnadová I, Nevin SM, Scully JL, Palmer EE. The opinions and experiences of people with intellectual disability regarding genetic testing and genetic medicine: A systematic review. Genet Med. 2022;24:535–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.013 Strnadová I, Loblinzk J, Scully JL, Danker J, Tso M, Jackaman KM, et al. “I am not a number!” Opinions and preferences of people with intellectual disability about genetic healthcare. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:1057–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01282-3 Abrams LR, McBride CM, Hooker GW, Cappella JN, Koehly LM. The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141532 Zusevics KL, Strong KA, Farrell MH, Shimoyama ME. Matching the pace of genomic advances through the integration of genomic education into high school health education. J Sch Health. 2014;84:351–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12160 Hotez E, Rava JA, Shea L, Kuo A. Developing "Adulting for Health": Investigating the Health Needs of Neurodivergent Emerging Adults. Cureus. 2023;15:e41102. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41102 Turchi RM, Kuo DZ, Rusher JW, Seltzer RR, Lehmann CU, Grout RW, et al. Considerations for Alternative Decision-Making When Transitioning to Adulthood for Youth With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Policy Statement. Pediatrics. 2024;153. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066841 Chinn D. Critical health literacy health promotion and people with intellectual disabilities. Asia Pac J Health Sport Phys Educ. 2014;5:249–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2014.940811 McKnight L, Pearce A, Willis A, Young MA, Terrill B. Supporting teachers to use genomics as a context in the classroom: an evaluation of learning resources for high school biology. J Community Genet. 2021;12:653–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00550-3 Whitley KV, Tueller JA, Weber KS. Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030768 Stern F, Kampourakis K. Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era. Stud Sci Edu. 2017;53:193–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731 NSW Education Standards Authority. NSW Education Standards Authority Home page. Available at: https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/home/ [accessed 12 Dec 2024]. Jackaman KM, Strnadová I, Willow SA, Leach Scully J, Palmer EE, Terrill B. Developing genomic literacy in high school students with intellectual disability: Teachers’ experiences and perspectives. Under review at Eur J Hum Genet (356-24-EJHGR). Strnadová I, Dowse L, Garcia-Lee B. Doing Research Inclusively: Co-Production in Action. DIIU UNSW Sydney. Available at: https://www.disabilityinnovation.unsw.edu.au/inclusive-research/research-resources [accessed 12 Jul 2024]. 2022. Strnadová I, Dowse L, Watfern C. Doing research inclusively: Guidelines for co-producing research with people with disability. DIIU UNSW Sydney. Available at: https://www.disabilityinnovation.unsw.edu.au/inclusive-research/guidelines [accessed 12 Jul 2024]. 2020. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. Sage Open. 2014;4:2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633 Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048 Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41:545–7. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 GeneEQUAL. Easy Read genes and genetic conditions booklet. Available at: https://geneequal.com/genetic-resources/our-easy-read-health-booklets/ [accessed 21 March 2024]. 2023. Liu C, Wang D, Liu C, Jiang J, Wang X, Chen H, et al. What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Fam Med Community Health. 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000351 Australian Government Department of Education. Disability Standards for Education 2005. Available at: https://www.education.gov.au/disability-standards-education-2005 [accessed 1 Dec 2024]. Park A, Eckert TL, Zaso MJ, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Vanable PA, Carey KB, et al. Associations Between Health Literacy and Health Behaviors Among Urban High School Students. J Sch Health. 2017;87:885–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12567 Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. National roadmap for improving the health of people with intellectual disability. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/national-roadmap-for-improving-the-health-of-people-with-intellectual-disability [accessed 4 April 2024]. 2023. Australian Medical Association. Position statement: Health in the context of education – 2014. Available at: https://www.ama.com.au/position-statement/health-context-education-2014 [accessed 1 April 2024]. 2015. Tideman M, Kristén L, Szönyi K. The preparation for entry into adulthood - supported decision-making in upper secondary school for students with intellectual disability. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2023;38:155–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2045814 Dunn M, Strnadova I, Scully JL, Hansen J, Loblinzk J, Sarfaraz S, et al. Equitable and accessible informed healthcare consent process for people with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33:328–39. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016113 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Health literacy: Taking action to improved safety and quality. Available at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/health-literacy-taking-action-improve-safety-and-quality [accessed 3 April 2024]. 2014. Downs J, Keeley J, Skoss R, Mills J, Nevill T, Schippers A, et al. Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability. Int J Equity Health. 2024;23:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5 Nieto C, Morina A. The dream school: Mind-changing perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;32:1549–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12650 Llewellyn G, Wayland S, Hindmarsh G. Disability and child sexual abuse in institutional contexts. Available at: https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/media-releases/research-report-disability-and-child-sexual-abuse-institutional-contexts-released [accessed 1 April 2024]. 2016. NSW Parliament Legislative Council Portfolio Committee No. 3. Children and young people with disability in New South Wales educational settings. Available at: https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/inquiries/3022/Report%20-%20disability%20in%20educational%20settings%20-%20accessible%20with%20covers.pdf [accessed 1 Dec 2024]. 2024. Shogren KA, Gross JMS, Forber-Pratt AJ, Francis GL, Satter AL, Blue-Banning M, Hill C. The Perspectives of Students With and Without Disabilities on Inclusive Schools. Res Pract Pers Sev Disabil. 2015;40:243–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915583493 Samuelsson J, Holmer E, Johnels JÅ, Palmqvist L, Heimann M, Reichenberg M, Thunberg G. My point of view: Students with intellectual and communicative disabilities express their views on speech and reading using Talking Mats. Br J Learn Disabil. 2024;52:23–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12543 Martin A-M, Divane S, Twomey S, O’Neill L, McCarthy J, Egan C, et al. Don’t Mention the Diet! A health promotion initiative to support healthy diet and lifestyle decision-making by people with intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2021;49:475–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12382 NSW Government. Evidence-based strategies for intellectual disability. Available at: https://education.nsw.gov.au/campaigns/inclusive-practice-hub/all-resources/secondary-resources/understanding-disability/intellectual-disability/evidence-based-strategies [accessed 3 April 2024]. World Health Organization. Health literacy. Available at: https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/ninth-global-conference/health-literacy [accessed 3 April 2024]. Geukes C, Bröder J, Latteck Ä-D. Health Literacy and People with Intellectual Disabilities: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and What We Need: A Theoretical Discourse. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:463. Strnadová I, Danker J, Dowse L, Tso M. Supporting students with disability to improve academic, social and emotional, and self-determination and life-skills outcomes: umbrella review of evidence-based practices. Int J Incl Educ. 2024;28:3606–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2221239 Mirzaian CB, Deavenport-Saman A, Hudson SM, Betz CL. Barriers to Mental Health Care Transition for Youth and Young Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Co-occurring Mental Health Conditions: Stakeholders' Perspectives. Community Ment Health J. 2024;60:1104–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01262-x Additional Declarations There is no duality of interest Not applicable Supplementary Files HansenetalSupplementEasyReadsummary.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 23 Feb, 2026 Read the published version in European Journal of Human Genetics → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: revise 21 Jul, 2025 Review # 3 received at journal 09 Jul, 2025 Reviewer # 3 agreed at journal 29 Jun, 2025 Review # 2 received at journal 26 Jun, 2025 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 26 Jun, 2025 Review # 1 received at journal 07 Mar, 2025 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 03 Mar, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 07 Jan, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 19 Dec, 2024 First submitted to journal 18 Dec, 2024 Unknown event 16 Dec, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 13 Dec, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5635751","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":398905030,"identity":"6214282c-e2f7-4f93-9380-da38a75818b2","order_by":0,"name":"Iva Strnadová","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Iva","middleName":"","lastName":"Strnadová","suffix":""},{"id":398905031,"identity":"1d82bb07-92d9-4c54-b593-90f6a01b5b9f","order_by":1,"name":"Jennifer Hansen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of NSW","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jennifer","middleName":"","lastName":"Hansen","suffix":""},{"id":398905032,"identity":"3a1df2c3-d54b-41b3-93b2-c3e773d951b3","order_by":2,"name":"Joanne Danker","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Joanne","middleName":"","lastName":"Danker","suffix":""},{"id":398905033,"identity":"1131af06-30e3-4806-8ddf-7447af0b966c","order_by":3,"name":"Karen-Maia Jackaman","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Karen-Maia","middleName":"","lastName":"Jackaman","suffix":""},{"id":398905034,"identity":"df502fbb-3533-49e5-9ff4-f3d7d5001333","order_by":4,"name":"Julie Loblinzk","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Julie","middleName":"","lastName":"Loblinzk","suffix":""},{"id":398905035,"identity":"76358565-0af2-43dd-8f7c-0b4618da7e89","order_by":5,"name":"Skie Sarfaraz","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Skie","middleName":"","lastName":"Sarfaraz","suffix":""},{"id":398905036,"identity":"c72d312a-a3bd-4e6a-9951-f28e42f8564a","order_by":6,"name":"Jackie Leach Scully","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jackie","middleName":"Leach","lastName":"Scully","suffix":""},{"id":398905037,"identity":"f74811aa-2a6a-4ac5-872b-1288138df4f0","order_by":7,"name":"Jackie Boyle","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9943-8955","institution":"Hunter Genetics","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jackie","middleName":"","lastName":"Boyle","suffix":""},{"id":398905038,"identity":"38781b6d-cf35-4bd2-bd1b-e26b623aa9dc","order_by":8,"name":"Bronwyn Terrill","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bronwyn","middleName":"","lastName":"Terrill","suffix":""},{"id":398905039,"identity":"01ad7c18-70a5-4656-9ea9-efd17b4d0153","order_by":9,"name":"Elizabeth Palmer","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-215X","institution":"University of New South Wales","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Elizabeth","middleName":"","lastName":"Palmer","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-12-13 05:55:31","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5635751/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5635751/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02041-w","type":"published","date":"2026-02-23T05:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":73404051,"identity":"0434b80a-9f29-43ea-8055-ff037df4d892","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-09 15:01:11","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1441144,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverview of themes and subthemes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"HansenetalFigure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5635751/v1/3e431c84924f4f4d68dd5a00.png"},{"id":103301457,"identity":"52a572ab-f9ee-411e-8129-30d8cc290f0d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-24 08:13:06","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2551559,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5635751/v1/f12091c0-9cb3-4502-8c55-0d9d2bf97087.pdf"},{"id":73404060,"identity":"2dca3949-3345-4bc4-b407-746a9a5dce35","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-09 15:01:11","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1068305,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"HansenetalSupplementEasyReadsummary.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5635751/v1/81f6b776f12a09af42392d6c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is no duality of interest\nNot applicable","formattedTitle":"“It was up to me to be curious”: Perceptions and Experiences of Students with Intellectual Disability on Genetics and Health Education","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003ePeople with intellectual disability experience premature mortality, more avoidable deaths and have poor healthcare experiences [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Recent studies identified challenges to acquiring health literacy, the ability to understand health information and apply it to make informed decisions about health and healthcare, as a key barrier to high quality healthcare for people with intellectual disability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClinical genetics is revolutionising our understanding of the causes of numerous conditions, including cancers, renal conditions, and many types of intellectual disability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. Genetic diagnosis can lead to better physical and mental health outcomes by providing more precise information to guide treatment and empowering patients about future health and reproduction [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. However, people with intellectual disability may miss out on these opportunities due to inequitable and non-inclusive genetic healthcare [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. Recent research shows that people with intellectual disability both want and have capacity to learn about their own genetics [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenetic health literacy is defined as \u0026ldquo;sufficient knowledge and understanding of genetic principles for individuals to make decisions that sustain personal well-being and effective participation in social decisions on genetic issues\u0026rdquo; [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. This can incorporate, for example, understanding potential advantages and disadvantages of genetic tests and gene-based therapies, and knowledge to make fully autonomous or shared genetic healthcare decisions. As genetics is integrated into healthcare, equitable access to support and education to develop genetic health literacy is needed for all members of society, with reasonable adjustments according to each individual\u0026rsquo;s learning and communication abilities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Becoming an empowered genetic health \u0026lsquo;consumer\u0026rsquo; requires education and support in two main areas: \u0026lsquo;functional\u0026rsquo; or foundational genetic health literacy, including knowledge of genes, genetic inheritance patterns and genetic conditions; and growth of skills and confidence to identify and advocate for one\u0026rsquo;s own healthcare goals and psychosocial needs in relation to genetic healthcare. This requires knowledge of one\u0026rsquo;s healthcare rights and responsibilities and skills in self-advocacy and self-management [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. This area has been described as encompassing \u0026lsquo;interactive\u0026rsquo; and \u0026lsquo;critical\u0026rsquo; health literacy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Australian schools, genetics-related content is predominately delivered in the Science syllabus [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. The high school science curriculum can lay the foundations of genetic knowledge (e.g. DNA and inherited traits) to support the development of genetic health literacy [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR17\" citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. The curriculum also contains content on how advances in technology can solve healthcare challenges and how people may use different ways of decision-making when deciding whether to apply new technologies to their own healthcare [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is little research on how to best teach students with intellectual disability about health and healthcare, including self-advocacy and self-management generally, and genetics and genetic healthcare specifically. In a recent qualitative study we identified gaps in teachers\u0026rsquo; knowledge of how to teach students with intellectual disability about genetics and health literacy in an accessible way, and a lack of resources to help teachers apply evidence-based practices in health and genetic education [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to genetics and health education for high school students with intellectual disability, from the students\u0026rsquo; perspective. To date, no study has focused on education in genetics, health, and health literacy from the point of view of students with intellectual disability. The research question guiding this study was: What are students\u0026rsquo; perceptions and experiences of high school education relevant to health and genetics?\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"METHODS","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis was an inclusive qualitative research study. In inclusive research, people with disability are not just participants but also co-creators of knowledge [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. Inclusive research involves co-production, a collaborative process where all stakeholders are involved in knowledge creation, fostering a shared community of practice [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. All study materials, including participant information statement and consent forms (PISCF) were available in Standard and Easy Read English. The study was approved by UNSW Sydney\u0026rsquo;s Human Research and Ethics Committee (HC210342).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParticipants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndividuals aged 12\u0026ndash;28 years with intellectual disability and living in Australia were recruited through social media channels, including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn, professional networks, parental networks, and grassroots organisations (e.g., self-advocacy organisations). A social media flyer included an introduction to genetics and health taught at school, the study aim, inclusion criteria and contact details.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eInterviews\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe semi-structured interview protocol was co-developed by a multidisciplinary team including researchers with expertise in special education and disability studies, a clinical geneticist, and co-researchers with intellectual disability. Interviews were conducted in person or online via Zoom. Consent was provided by participants using an accessible Easy Read PISCF, and guardian consent was provided for participants of school age.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the interview, the authors obtained consent from participants and assured them of their rights, stating they were not obligated to participate and could withdraw at any time without consequences. Participants were given pseudonyms for anonymity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterviews were audio-recorded with the participants\u0026rsquo; permission. Data were transcribed verbatim, deidentified, and analysed using inductive content analysis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. All interviews were open coded by JH. The first interview was independently open coded by JH and IS, and any disagreements resolved by JD. JH clustered the codes into categories which were then discussed with IS, and any disagreements resolved through discussion with JD to ensure validity and reliability [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. The categories were clustered into sub-themes, and sub-themes into themes capturing data relevant to the research question and representing the meaning and response within the dataset [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIS and JD undertook researcher triangulation, overseeing each stage of the analysis to ensure credibility [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Experts in genetics and intellectual disability contributed to the validation. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParticipants\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree Australian high school students and 11 recently graduated young adults with intellectual disability participated (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e): seven males, five females and two non-binary participants, aged 12 to 28 years (average 24 years). Most participants attended public or Catholic schools with a mixture of mainstream or support classes. Interviews lasted from 8\u0026ndash;73 minutes (average 34 minutes).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipant demographic data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eName\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(pseudonym)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLocation (state) and type of school\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSonny\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-binary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic co-educational support unit (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLee\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-binary\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic co-educational mainstream and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAndrew\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic co-educational support unit (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJasmine\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic co-educational support unit (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMichael\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatholic mainstream single sex and support classes; public co-educational mainstream and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuncan\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatholic mainstream single sex and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRodney\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatholic mainstream single sex and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLucas\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatholic mainstream single sex and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGail\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic co-educational mainstream (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJazzy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndependent school for specific purposes (Victoria)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBobby\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic co-educational school for Specific Purposes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImogen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic mainstream co-educational and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbigail\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic mainstream co-educational and support classes (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMilo\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePublic mainstream co-educational (NSW)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eNSW, New South Wales\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInductive content analysis revealed four key themes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e): (i) Science, health and genetics education, (ii) Health rights, (iii) Education rights, (iv) Recommendations for improving education to support genetic and health literacy.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1. Science, health and genetics education\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants commented on what was taught, how these topics were taught, and why they thought learning about these and related topics at school was important.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e1.1 What was taught (scope)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParticipating students had varying accounts of what they learned in science. They mentioned a wide range of topics, such as the difference between living and non-living things, planets, and chemicals. In health they learnt about human anatomy, what humans need to survive, handwashing, and dental hygiene.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTen participants shared what they were taught about genes and genetic conditions, which was highly variable. Sonny explained they had learned about genes but not genetic contributions to eye and hair colour.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eJazzy shared she had learned about genes and genetic conditions and connected it to something \u0026ldquo;health-wise\u0026rdquo;. She recalls being taught \u0026ldquo;there\u0026rsquo;s lots of genes in people\u0026rdquo; but that was not related to her health or that of others. However, she wondered about the connection between her genes and her own health and learning abilities \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; I know there\u0026rsquo;s a disability in me, so obviously there\u0026rsquo;s something\u0026hellip; a change\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFour participants stated they did not learn about genes or genetic conditions at school. Andrew said, \u0026ldquo;I\u0026rsquo;d never heard of it\u0026rdquo;, and only when he started working at a self-advocacy organisation \u0026ldquo;that\u0026rsquo;s when I started to find out\u0026rdquo;. Andrew\u0026rsquo;s experience was similar to Sonny\u0026rsquo;s, who learnt about connections between genes and disability when they accessed School Leaver Employment Supports and started to question their parents: \u0026ldquo;It was up to me to be curious\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e1.2 How it was taught\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParticipating students identified several \u003cb\u003ee\u003c/b\u003enablers to learning about science, health and genetics. These included experiments, outdoor learning experiences, videos, and checklists. Lucas summarised how teachers could facilitate learning to ensure students experience success: \u0026ldquo;Teacher taught, then video taught, then sign taught [signs and symbols], and movie taught\u0026rdquo;, because this sequence of steps would encourage students to attempt tasks independently. Several barriers to learning were also identified. Six participants had experienced inaccessible lessons, including a lot of information to recall and process, or where scientific vocabulary was not explained so that two participants felt \u0026ldquo;stupid\u0026rdquo;. One participant found equipment difficult to use, and their understanding and engagement was hindered by lack of explanation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor genetic concepts, students identified some enablers. Lucas described how teachers used videos, diagrams, signage, charts and worksheets to explain about genes and genetic conditions. One video showed if your father has a heart attack or diabetes \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; you have a chance of having that as well\u0026rdquo;. Barriers to learning about genetic concepts included lessons that used animal examples instead of humans, or where students were not taught about genetic concepts at all.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2. Health rights\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants shared their opinions about and experiences of healthcare, rights, and decision-making.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Students\u0026rsquo; opinions about healthcare, rights, and decision-making\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudents shared their opinions about the importance of learning about healthcare rights and making informed decisions. Eight participants described learning about health and healthcare choices as fundamental. Andrew thought that school \u0026ldquo;failed\u0026rdquo; to teach students about healthcare choices or to provide information on how to be informed health consumers. He noted the importance of learning about health and healthcare choices at an early age to prepare for adulthood, and highlighted the need for more teacher training, and resources on how to teach students about health and healthcare choices. Sonny felt they had \u0026ldquo;no control\u0026rdquo; over their body and \u0026ldquo;your body is there for other people to look at\u0026rdquo;. Participants had been taught that doctors have authority, and to accept whatever healthcare professionals say. Both Gail and her mother reported she was not taught to ask questions of doctors or make decisions about taking medication.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAndrew said schools should teach students about decision-making and choices as \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; it\u0026rsquo;s important because you don\u0026rsquo;t want to go throughout adulthood always relying on the opinions of others\u0026rdquo;. He discussed how \u0026ldquo;we are our own individual selves\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;we have our right to be able to make decisions\u0026hellip; according to our own needs\u0026rdquo;. Lee thought similarly, adding that not everyone has a support person throughout their whole life.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwo participants wished decision-making had been taught at school. Andrew recommended students be taught how to say \u0026ldquo;no\u0026rdquo; when they are uncomfortable with the presented choices presented, while Sonny suggested schools could support students to gain more confidence and experience with decision-making, for example by providing \u0026lsquo;scripts\u0026rsquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Students\u0026rsquo; experiences of learning about healthcare, healthcare rights and decision-making\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEducation on healthcare rights and decision-making was very limited. Sexual health and puberty were topics recalled by participants, but they reported varied and fragmented experiences. Only one participant, Andrew, reported being taught about consent, while Sonny recalled that lessons about romantic experiences focused on heterosexual relationships. Imogen learned about respectful behaviours in romantic relationships. Two participants described learning about sexual relationships and the use of contraception to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. Four participants had been taught about the menstrual cycle and sanitary options.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLearning how to live healthily by eating well was highlighted by eight participants, whilst five participants mentioned keeping active. Two participants shared experiences of learning about mental health. Andrew had only been taught about severe depression; similarly, Sonny was only told about \u0026ldquo;extreme\u0026rdquo; mental health conditions in \u0026ldquo;very clinical\u0026rdquo; terms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOnly one participant, Rodney, was taught how to take medications safely by always seeking medical advice. Sonny had learned about recreational drugs and how you should \u0026ldquo;never do drugs\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3. Education rights\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants communicated the barriers they experienced to access quality education, lifelong learning opportunities, and dignity to pursue learning in a safe environment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Lack of evidence-based practices and reasonable adjustments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMany barriers to learning were identified by participants. Curiosity was discouraged, as indicated by Sonny, who was removed from a class for asking too many questions. Repetition of the same content over several years, copying teachers\u0026rsquo; notes from the board, and inaccessible school exams also hindered students\u0026rsquo; interest and engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants reported varying levels of support and reasonable adjustments. The lack of accessible and explicit instruction made it difficult for participants to complete tasks. Imogen and Abigail noted how discouraging it was when tasks were too hard or included too much reading. Being punished when they did not understand tasks was another barrier. Lee commented that insufficient time and support was provided: \u0026ldquo;they were always in a rush, and they never seem to care\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Stigma, bullying and abuse\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eBullying was a \u0026ldquo;sad reality\u0026rdquo; in high school for half of the participants. Lucas said he wished school taught more effective ways of dealing with bullying. Bobby implemented the strategy taught at primary school in high school, which was saying \u0026ldquo;Stop it, I don\u0026rsquo;t like it\u0026rdquo; but found it was ineffective: \u0026ldquo;Me say stop, and me move away, but they keep following me\u0026rdquo;. Jazzy wished she was taught how to make complaints to teachers about bullying.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwo participants shared how their traumatic high school experiences impacted them. Bobby highlighted that one of his teachers showed no understanding of students with disability, being \u0026ldquo;always mean\u0026rdquo;, raising her voice and calling students names.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSonny reflected on their experience of unhelpful reactions to disclosures of abuse. When linking their experience of abuse to the school curriculum, Sonny wished they had been taught about recognising and reporting abuse, and that teachers need more training and skills of how to teach recognising and reporting abuse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4. Recommendations for improving education to support genetic and health literacy\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudents discussed why information about genetic conditions, health, and related topics of disability and neurodiversity should be taught at schools and made recommendations about who should be involved in teaching, how they would like to have received health and science education, and other topics related to health literacy that should be covered.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1 Why students should learn about genetics, health conditions, neurodiversity and disability in schools\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFour participants discussed why people should learn about genes and genetic conditions. Jazzy highlighted the importance of learning about these topics as people \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; want to know more\u0026hellip; about something that they\u0026rsquo;ve got inside of them\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSonny thought that learning about genes and genetic conditions would encourage people to be \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; a lot more accepting\u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo; whilst Andrew highlighted that \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip; it gives people more of that understanding about the different types of disabilities\u0026hellip; [and so they] \u0026hellip; gain more compassion\u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo; He noted \u0026ldquo;\u0026hellip;there\u0026rsquo;s still a lot of stigma out there\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eJasmine wished her school taught about Down Syndrome, but preferred people to use the term Trisomy 21 rather than Down Syndrome \u0026ldquo;because that makes me upset\u0026rdquo;. Sonny noted they were never taught about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or autism at school. They wished they had and added that if autism continues to be a \u0026ldquo;taboo topic\u0026rdquo; in schools, people are going to associate neurodiversity with being \u0026ldquo;something bad\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2 Who should do the teaching about science, genetics and health literacy\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eImogen suggested that experts, such as doctors, be part of science instruction. Others suggested nurses, genetic healthcare and education professionals should be involved, as well as those with lived experience who could provide co-education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree participants described that teachers who understand students\u0026rsquo; needs are significant enablers. Seven participants had access to teachers\u0026rsquo; aides during lessons, with some positive experiences. Andrew said the teacher\u0026rsquo;s aide in his support class would break down tasks further than the subject teacher, and Sonny noted that support staff often had more knowledge of students\u0026rsquo; reasonable adjustments than the subject teacher: \u0026ldquo;So the thing that stops learning is people who are not listening to the people [learning support staff] who knows these kids the best\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3 How it should be taught\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFive participants gave examples of accessible ways to teach about genes and genetic conditions. All five suggested evidence-based practices, including visual supports and videos. Imogen suggested the GeneEQUAL Easy Read booklet about genes and genetic conditions as a resource for teachers [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.4 Beyond academics: students call for essential life skills\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants discussed the role of school in teaching them about decision-making and making choices more generally. Some participating students and young people were taught about decision-making in their daily lives, while others were not.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree young people wished they had been taught more about emotions and emotional regulation. Sonny wished they were taught how emotions work, and Andrew wanted to have learnt more about compassion and understanding.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSonny felt that schools need to teach about online information and social media more critically: \u0026ldquo;And schools have not kept up with any of that. That\u0026rsquo;s another reason why it doesn\u0026rsquo;t feel safe anymore\u0026rdquo;.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study aimed to answer the research question: What are students’ perceptions and experiences of high school education relevant to health and genetics? The findings show participants received general education about sexual health and relationships, nutrition and physical activity, alcohol and illicit drug use, mental health and wellbeing, and occasionally about genes and genetic conditions. However, in general they did not receive information that linked clearly enough to their lives and supported them to make informed health decisions and be a partner in their own healthcare.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHealth literacy skills involve reading, writing, speaking, listening, using technology, networking, and skills associated with making requests, advocacy, and complaints [27]. The barriers that most participants experienced to developing and consolidating health literacy skills included too much reading and complex information, lack of accessible and explicit instruction, difficult instructions, and complex scientific vocabulary. Under the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Australian Government), teachers have a legal requirement to implement measures and actions to help students with disability access learning on the same basis as their peers without disability [28].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePoor health literacy is a significant public issue, as it hinders people’s ability to effectively communicate concerns, understand and follow health providers' instructions, and benefit from health services [29]. Such poor health literacy has been directly linked to poor healthcare outcomes, and neglect, abuse and trauma in the healthcare system [1, 30]. Given that information about health and health systems is taught in schools [31],there is an urgent need to review how best to teach relevant curriculum content and upskill teachers in respectful, supportive, and trauma-informed teaching.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParticipants recommended that explicit education about decision-making in general, and specifically about their own healthcare, should have been included in their school education [32]. If teachers are unaware of students’ needs and lack the professional development and resources to teach effective health literacy at schools, students are forced to rely on healthcare professionals, parents, carers, friends, and the media. However, our research and that of others clearly shows this does not happen consistently, due to multiple barriers including lack of time, resources and confidence of families and health professionals, as well as the assumption that people with intellectual disability lack the capacity to be partners in their healthcare [9, 12, 19, 33]. Without knowledge and skills, people are less likely to participate in making decisions about their healthcare and more likely to disengage from health screening and recommended therapies and lifestyle advice, which can be explicitly linked to higher rates of avoidable morbidities and death [34, 35].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe reality behind the school experience was a particularly disturbing theme. People with intellectual disability experience more abuse and violence than people without disability, with girls and women with intellectual disability experiencing higher rates of violence [1]. Being bullied, abused, and threatened are shared experiences of students with intellectual disability in education settings [36]. Globally, students with intellectual disability appear to be at higher risk of sexual abuse by peers or teacher/support staff [37].Teachers may need additional support or resources to help them take into consideration students’ experiences of abuse and violence and how these affect learning and engagement with genetic health and health-related education. A trauma-informed framework has been identified as a critical component in effective education for students with intellectual disability, as evidenced by its inclusion in a recent State Parliamentary enquiry [38].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe participants also highlighted specific qualities they wished were taught and modelled at school: patience, understanding and compassion. These qualities were also communicated in a study exploring the ‘dream school’ for people with intellectual disability [36] and highlighted by students with and without disability in a study about the culture of their school, inclusion, and the practices implemented to support all students [39].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis is the first study asking students with intellectual disability about their perceptions and experiences of high school health and genetics education. By enrolling participants across different school sectors and support settings, our study provides a breadth of high school experiences. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA limitation of this research is the small number of participants, and limited geographic spread (all but one participant attended a school in the state of New South Wales in Australia). As a result, perceptions and experiences are not necessarily generalisable to all students, and future studies should explore how a broader representative sample could be included equitably, including students with higher support needs and those from regional, rural and remote areas of Australia.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImplications for Future Research \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFuture research conducted in other Australian states and territories and worldwide would capture broader perceptions and experiences of students and young people with intellectual disability. The principle of \"Nothing about us without us\", and the shift towards a more inclusive socio-ecological model of disability, emphasise the importance of involving and valuing the opinions of students and young people with intellectual disability in educational settings [40]. Through collaboration, respect and empowerment, students with intellectual disability can become informed health consumers in adulthood [41]. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurther research is needed in Australia to explore appropriate evidence-based practices to teach students with intellectual disability about health and genetic concepts. Strategies evaluated by researchers and identified as effective in educational settings [42] can then assist students to successfully access complex concepts, which will help them better understand their role and responsibility as informed health consumers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE ","content":"\u003cp\u003eHealth literacy is considered a critical determinant of health [43]. Compared to the general population, people with intellectual disability experience more barriers to accessible health services and worse health outcomes [1, 2, 30].\u0026nbsp;Additionally, the experiences of people with intellectual disability are overlooked in health literacy literature\u0026nbsp;[14, 44].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudents in this study wanted to learn more about health and genetics in ways that would enable them to become informed health consumers. They identified enablers such as teachers’ knowledge and consistent use of reasonable adjustments, greater understanding and compassion about their disability, and updated professional development for teachers to deliver health literacy skills in more meaningful and contextual ways. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHigh schools have much to learn from the perceptions and experiences of students with intellectual disability. Our study participants recommended accessible, person-centred and respectful strategies for facilitating health and genetic health content to help prepare them for life-related decision-making and navigating the healthcare system. These recommendations included reasonable adjustments such as check lists, role play and using visual supports, which is a well-established evidence-based practice [45].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBased on their recommendations, we propose that training for educators and resources (for example lesson plans and multimedia resources) should be co-designed with people with intellectual disability and teachers, as well as other key stakeholders such as parents, using evidence-based approaches [19, 20]. These resources should focus on building foundational genetic and health literacy and skills and capability in shared decision making, self-management and self-advocacy. Such a package, especially if complemented by resources and training for healthcare professionals, has the potential to support more successful transitions from paediatric to adult health services, an acknowledged part of healthcare requiring urgent attention [12, 46]. Collaboration with experts such as genetic healthcare professionals is needed to ensure accurate information and the development of person-centered and trauma-informed resources and training [1, 30].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLastly, this study highlights the importance of inclusive research in promoting visibility of people with intellectual disability. It helps to deconstruct ableism \u0026nbsp;by valuing the lived experiences, opinions and contributions of people with intellectual disability as not only participants but as co-researchers [21]. We demonstrate how the voices and agency of students with intellectual disability, previously rarely elicited or heard, can be powerfully incorporated into much needed changes in healthcare policy and practice. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDATA AVAILABIITY STATEMENT\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDeidentified data are available upon request. Additional data and materials such as data collection forms, data extraction and analysis templates can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACKNOWLEDGEMENTS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to acknowledge the students and young people that participated in the study and the organisations and personnel which supported their recruitment. We acknowledge Sierra Angelina Willow for creating a visual abstract, Sarah Hayes for developing Figure 1, and Natalie Roberts for her expert support with submission of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConceptualisation: IS, EP, JLR, KMJ, JH; Methodology: IS, BT, JH, JB, EP; Validation: JLR, SS, IS, EP, BT; Formal analysis: JH, JD, IS; Investigation: JH, JLR, IS; Writing – original draft: JH, EP, BT, IS; Writing – reviewing and editing: JH, IS, JD, KMJ, JLR, SS, JLS, JB, BT, EP; Supervision: IS, EP, BT, JD; Project administration: JH; Funding acquisition: IS, BT, JLR, EP, JLS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFUNDING\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was funded by the University of New South Wales Sydney, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eETHICAL APPROVAL\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study received ethics approval from UNSW Sydney’s Human Research and Ethics Committee (HC210342). \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCOMPETING INTERESTS\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Government Royal Commission in Violence Abuse Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. Final Report - Volume 3, Nature and extent of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/final-report-volume-3-nature-and-extent-violence-abuse-neglect-and-exploitation\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/final-report-volume-3-nature-and-extent-violence-abuse-neglect-and-exploitation\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Accessed 1 April 2024. 2023\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrollor J, Srasuebkul P, Xu H, Howlett S. Cause of death and potentially avoidable deaths in Australian adults with intellectual disability using retrospective linked data. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013489. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013489\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013489\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSyurina EV, Brankovic I, Probst-Hensch N, Brand A. Genome-based health literacy: a new challenge for public health genomics. Public Health Genomics. 2011;14:201\u0026ndash;10. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1159/000324238\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1159/000324238\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSavatt JM, Myers SM. Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:526779. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.526779\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fped.2021.526779\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eManickam K, McClain MR, Demmer LA, Biswas S, Kearney HM, Malinowski J, et al. Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2021;23:2029\u0026ndash;37. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01242-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41436-021-01242-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAli A, Scior K, Ratti V, Strydom A, King M, Hassiotis A. Discrimination and other barriers to accessing health care: perspectives of patients with mild and moderate intellectual disability and their carers. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70855. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070855\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0070855\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTruesdale M, Brown M, Taggart L, Bradley A, Paterson D, Sirisena C, et al. Trauma-informed care: A qualitative study exploring the views and experiences of professionals in specialist health services for adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;32:1437\u0026ndash;45. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12634\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jar.12634\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrnadov\u0026aacute; I, Nevin SM, Scully JL, Palmer EE. The opinions and experiences of people with intellectual disability regarding genetic testing and genetic medicine: A systematic review. Genet Med. 2022;24:535\u0026ndash;48. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.013\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.013\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrnadov\u0026aacute; I, Loblinzk J, Scully JL, Danker J, Tso M, Jackaman KM, et al. \u0026ldquo;I am not a number!\u0026rdquo; Opinions and preferences of people with intellectual disability about genetic healthcare. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023;31:1057\u0026ndash;65. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01282-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41431-023-01282-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbrams LR, McBride CM, Hooker GW, Cappella JN, Koehly LM. The Many Facets of Genetic Literacy: Assessing the Scalability of Multiple Measures for Broad Use in Survey Research. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141532. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141532\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0141532\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZusevics KL, Strong KA, Farrell MH, Shimoyama ME. Matching the pace of genomic advances through the integration of genomic education into high school health education. J Sch Health. 2014;84:351\u0026ndash;4. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12160\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/josh.12160\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHotez E, Rava JA, Shea L, Kuo A. Developing \"Adulting for Health\": Investigating the Health Needs of Neurodivergent Emerging Adults. Cureus. 2023;15:e41102. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41102\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.7759/cureus.41102\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTurchi RM, Kuo DZ, Rusher JW, Seltzer RR, Lehmann CU, Grout RW, et al. Considerations for Alternative Decision-Making When Transitioning to Adulthood for Youth With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Policy Statement. Pediatrics. 2024;153. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066841\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1542/peds.2024-066841\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChinn D. Critical health literacy health promotion and people with intellectual disabilities. Asia Pac J Health Sport Phys Educ. 2014;5:249\u0026ndash;65. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2014.940811\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/18377122.2014.940811\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcKnight L, Pearce A, Willis A, Young MA, Terrill B. Supporting teachers to use genomics as a context in the classroom: an evaluation of learning resources for high school biology. J Community Genet. 2021;12:653\u0026ndash;62. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00550-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12687-021-00550-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhitley KV, Tueller JA, Weber KS. Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030768\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijms21030768\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStern F, Kampourakis K. Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era. Stud Sci Edu. 2017;53:193\u0026ndash;225. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNSW Education Standards Authority. NSW Education Standards Authority Home page. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/home/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/home/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 12 Dec 2024].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJackaman KM, Strnadov\u0026aacute; I, Willow SA, Leach Scully J, Palmer EE, Terrill B. Developing genomic literacy in high school students with intellectual disability: Teachers\u0026rsquo; experiences and perspectives. Under review at Eur J Hum Genet (356-24-EJHGR).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrnadov\u0026aacute; I, Dowse L, Garcia-Lee B. Doing Research Inclusively: Co-Production in Action. DIIU UNSW Sydney. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.disabilityinnovation.unsw.edu.au/inclusive-research/research-resources\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.disabilityinnovation.unsw.edu.au/inclusive-research/research-resources\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 12 Jul 2024]. 2022.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrnadov\u0026aacute; I, Dowse L, Watfern C. Doing research inclusively: Guidelines for co-producing research with people with disability. DIIU UNSW Sydney. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.disabilityinnovation.unsw.edu.au/inclusive-research/guidelines\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.disabilityinnovation.unsw.edu.au/inclusive-research/guidelines\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 12 Jul 2024]. 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElo S, K\u0026auml;\u0026auml;ri\u0026auml;inen M, Kanste O, P\u0026ouml;lkki T, Utriainen K, Kyng\u0026auml;s H. Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. Sage Open. 2014;4:2158244014522633. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/2158244014522633\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15:398\u0026ndash;405. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nhs.12048\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41:545\u0026ndash;7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1188/14.ONF.545-547\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGeneEQUAL. Easy Read genes and genetic conditions booklet. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://geneequal.com/genetic-resources/our-easy-read-health-booklets/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://geneequal.com/genetic-resources/our-easy-read-health-booklets/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 21 March 2024]. 2023.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu C, Wang D, Liu C, Jiang J, Wang X, Chen H, et al. What is the meaning of health literacy? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Fam Med Community Health. 2020;8. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2020-000351\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/fmch-2020-000351\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Government Department of Education. Disability Standards for Education 2005. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.education.gov.au/disability-standards-education-2005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.education.gov.au/disability-standards-education-2005\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 1 Dec 2024].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePark A, Eckert TL, Zaso MJ, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Vanable PA, Carey KB, et al. Associations Between Health Literacy and Health Behaviors Among Urban High School Students. J Sch Health. 2017;87:885\u0026ndash;93. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12567\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/josh.12567\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. National roadmap for improving the health of people with intellectual disability. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.health.gov.au/our-work/national-roadmap-for-improving-the-health-of-people-with-intellectual-disability\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/national-roadmap-for-improving-the-health-of-people-with-intellectual-disability\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 4 April 2024]. 2023.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Medical Association. Position statement: Health in the context of education \u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;2014. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.ama.com.au/position-statement/health-context-education-2014\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.ama.com.au/position-statement/health-context-education-2014\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 1 April 2024]. 2015.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTideman M, Krist\u0026eacute;n L, Sz\u0026ouml;nyi K. The preparation for entry into adulthood - supported decision-making in upper secondary school for students with intellectual disability. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2023;38:155\u0026ndash;67. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2045814\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/08856257.2022.2045814\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDunn M, Strnadova I, Scully JL, Hansen J, Loblinzk J, Sarfaraz S, et al. Equitable and accessible informed healthcare consent process for people with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024;33:328\u0026ndash;39. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016113\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016113\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Health literacy: Taking action to improved safety and quality. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/health-literacy-taking-action-improve-safety-and-quality\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/health-literacy-taking-action-improve-safety-and-quality\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 3 April 2024]. 2014.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDowns J, Keeley J, Skoss R, Mills J, Nevill T, Schippers A, et al. Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability. Int J Equity Health. 2024;23:119. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNieto C, Morina A. The dream school: Mind-changing perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;32:1549\u0026ndash;57. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12650\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jar.12650\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLlewellyn G, Wayland S, Hindmarsh G. Disability and child sexual abuse in institutional contexts. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/media-releases/research-report-disability-and-child-sexual-abuse-institutional-contexts-released\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/media-releases/research-report-disability-and-child-sexual-abuse-institutional-contexts-released\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 1 April 2024]. 2016.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNSW Parliament Legislative Council Portfolio Committee No. 3. Children and young people with disability in New South Wales educational settings. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/inquiries/3022/Report%20-%20disability%20in%20educational%20settings%20-%20accessible%20with%20covers.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/inquiries/3022/Report%20-%20disability%20in%20educational%20settings%20-%20accessible%20with%20covers.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 1 Dec 2024]. 2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShogren KA, Gross JMS, Forber-Pratt AJ, Francis GL, Satter AL, Blue-Banning M, Hill C. The Perspectives of Students With and Without Disabilities on Inclusive Schools. Res Pract Pers Sev Disabil. 2015;40:243\u0026ndash;60. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915583493\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1540796915583493\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSamuelsson J, Holmer E, Johnels J\u0026Aring;, Palmqvist L, Heimann M, Reichenberg M, Thunberg G. My point of view: Students with intellectual and communicative disabilities express their views on speech and reading using Talking Mats. Br J Learn Disabil. 2024;52:23\u0026ndash;35. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12543\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/bld.12543\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartin A-M, Divane S, Twomey S, O\u0026rsquo;Neill L, McCarthy J, Egan C, et al. Don\u0026rsquo;t Mention the Diet! A health promotion initiative to support healthy diet and lifestyle decision-making by people with intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2021;49:475\u0026ndash;81. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12382\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/bld.12382\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNSW Government. Evidence-based strategies for intellectual disability. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://education.nsw.gov.au/campaigns/inclusive-practice-hub/all-resources/secondary-resources/understanding-disability/intellectual-disability/evidence-based-strategies\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://education.nsw.gov.au/campaigns/inclusive-practice-hub/all-resources/secondary-resources/understanding-disability/intellectual-disability/evidence-based-strategies\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 3 April 2024].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization. Health literacy. Available at: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/ninth-global-conference/health-literacy\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/ninth-global-conference/health-literacy\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [accessed 3 April 2024].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGeukes C, Br\u0026ouml;der J, Latteck \u0026Auml;-D. Health Literacy and People with Intellectual Disabilities: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and What We Need: A Theoretical Discourse. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:463.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrnadov\u0026aacute; I, Danker J, Dowse L, Tso M. Supporting students with disability to improve academic, social and emotional, and self-determination and life-skills outcomes: umbrella review of evidence-based practices. Int J Incl Educ. 2024;28:3606\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2221239\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13603116.2023.2221239\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMirzaian CB, Deavenport-Saman A, Hudson SM, Betz CL. Barriers to Mental Health Care Transition for Youth and Young Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Co-occurring Mental Health Conditions: Stakeholders' Perspectives. Community Ment Health J. 2024;60:1104\u0026ndash;16. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01262-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10597-024-01262-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"european-journal-of-human-genetics","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ejhg","sideBox":"Learn more about [European Journal of Human Genetics](http://www.nature.com/ejhg/)","snPcode":"41431","submissionUrl":"https://mts-ejhg.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"European Journal of Human Genetics","twitterHandle":"@ejhg_journal","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"health literacy, genetic education, healthcare choices, intellectual disability, genetics, informed healthcare consumers. ","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5635751/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5635751/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003ePeople with intellectual disability want to learn more about their health and genetics. They want to be empowered with the knowledge and skills to make informed health and genetic healthcare choices. Little is known about what high school students with intellectual disability learn about health, genetics or genetic healthcare. To address this gap, we conducted an inclusive qualitative research study in Australia.\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eFourteen Australian current and recently graduated students with intellectual disability participated in semi-structured interviews. Inductive content analysis revealed four key themes: (i) Science, health and genetics education, (ii) Health rights, (iii) Education rights, (iv) Recommendations for improving genetic and health literacy. Students with intellectual disability reported they were not taught about genetics and health, making healthcare choices, and/or making life decisions at school. They felt this disadvantages and disempowers them in becoming informed healthcare consumers. They recommended that teachers should be supported with resources to deliver inclusive, person-centred and respectful lessons that inform decision-making about genetics, health and healthcare choices. Future research should focus on how best to upskill teachers to support students with intellectual disability for their future health choices in a respectful, supportive, student-centred and strengths-based way. This will help prepare young people with intellectual disability to navigate the healthcare system and be empowered partners in their own healthcare. The growth of such skills has been suggested as critical in inequities in healthcare access for people with intellectual disability, as well as improving healthcare experiences and outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"“It was up to me to be curious”: Perceptions and Experiences of Students with Intellectual Disability on Genetics and Health Education","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-01-09 15:01:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5635751/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"revise","date":"2025-07-21T21:37:25+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-07-09T22:45:41+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-06-30T02:49:17+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-06-26T14:24:04+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-06-26T13:45:42+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-03-07T17:19:44+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2025-03-03T09:13:07+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-01-07T13:26:37+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-12-19T09:46:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"European Journal of Human Genetics","date":"2024-12-18T23:34:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksFailed","content":"","date":"2024-12-16T14:53:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-12-13T05:48:03+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"european-journal-of-human-genetics","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ejhg","sideBox":"Learn more about [European Journal of Human Genetics](http://www.nature.com/ejhg/)","snPcode":"41431","submissionUrl":"https://mts-ejhg.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"European Journal of Human Genetics","twitterHandle":"@ejhg_journal","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"76147f31-f728-4f40-a7ec-c4cdd3825409","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 9th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":42500183,"name":"Health sciences/Health care/Public health"},{"id":42500184,"name":"Health sciences/Health care/Patient education"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-24T08:12:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5635751","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02041-w","journal":{"identity":"european-journal-of-human-genetics","isVorOnly":false,"title":"European Journal of Human Genetics"},"publishedOn":"2026-02-23 05:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"February 23rd, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-01-09 15:01:06","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41431-026-02041-w","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02041-w","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5635751","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5635751","identity":"rs-5635751","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}