Recreational climbing alters cliff soil chemistry and plant-associated fungal communities

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,675 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Summary Cliffs are environmentally extreme yet biodiversity-rich ecosystems that harbour specialist plants, many endemic and threatened. Plant persistence in these nutrient-poor substrates may depend on tightly linked soil- and root-associated microbial communities, which remain poorly understood. These interactions may become increasingly important with the global expansion of recreational climbing. While physical climbing impacts on vegetation are documented, potential chemical effects, from the use of climbing chalk (magnesium carbonate), on soil properties and plant-associated microbiota remain unknown. We sampled soils and roots beneath cliff-specialist and generalist plants, and unvegetated soils, across climbed and unclimbed routes in northern, central, and southern Spain. Soil physicochemical properties were quantified, fungal communities were characterized using ITS-metabarcoding, and structural equation modelling was used to disentangle direct and indirect effects. Climbing increased soil pH and altered soil chemical properties, driving shifts in fungal diversity and functional composition in soil and roots. The relative read abundance of root-associated symbiotrophic fungi declined, whereas arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and pathogens increased in climbed cliffs. Overall effects were consistent, with cliff-specialist plants mediating nutrient and fungal shifts. ur findings show that climbing can reshape cliff soil chemistry and fungal communities, with potential cascading consequences for plant functional performance, nutrient dynamics, and ecosystem resilience. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00