Diagnosis and treatment delay in gynecological malignancies. Does it affect outcome?

Joseph Menczer
In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · 2000 · vol. 10(2) , pp. 89–94 · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.00020.x · PMID:11240658 · W2012289482
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Delay of diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors is perceived as unfavorably affecting outcome. However, tumor behavior may be determined early in the histogenesis process and the outcome may be more a function of the biologic properties of the tumor than of our ability to make an early diagnosis. The objective of the present review is to evaluate data concerning the effect of diagnosis and treatment delay on outcome in gynecological malignancies. A medline search including the terms diagnosis delay, treatment delay, outcome, vulvar carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma was conducted and all pertinent articles in the English language were included. Relatively few investigations deal with the effect of diagnosis and treatment delay on prognostic factors and on outcome in invasive gynecological malignancies. The reviewed data do not seem to indicate an unequivocal deleterious effect of a delay of several weeks or even several months in patients with some gynecological malignancies. Intentional delay of diagnosis or treatment of gynecologic malignancies is unjustified; however, the data presented should encourage a closer scrutiny and possibly a revision of the concept of "early" diagnosis and of the notion that delay of any duration has a definite, unfavorable effect on outcome.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

References (37)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK