Old habits die hard: pigeons maintain route fidelity but reduce flight altitude when exposed to a raptor-like robot

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,523 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Prey organisms employ a range of adaptive strategies to mitigate predation risk, including camouflage, active predator deterrence by collective anti-predator behaviours, specialized predator evasion tactics, and spatial or temporal avoidance of predators. The latter may involve memorizing locations of non-lethal predator encounters and altering movement routines to subsequently avoid areas where such encounters are more likely, in line with the so-called ‘landscape of fear’ concept. We investigated whether and how experienced homing pigeons (Columba livia) altered their homing behaviour upon repeated exposures to simulated attacks by a robot mimicking a peregrine falcon (RobotFalcon), a common aerial predator of pigeons, along their consolidated homing route. Pigeons showed evidence of immediate responses to predator detection, considerably reducing their flight altitude (by ~ 50%) when they approach the RobotFalcon, starting when ~ 200 m from it, and maintained such lower altitude also when leaving the RobotFalcon area. Yet, pigeons showed no evidence of altering their path to avoid the area where they were more likely to encounter the RobotFalcon, even in subsequent flights when the RobotFalcon was absent, indicating that the tendency to retrace consolidated routes was not affected by predation risk. Our experiment showed that pigeons adaptively responded to immediate predation risk by flying closer to the ground, which may reduce the success of aerial predator attacks. These findings challenge the landscape of fear paradigm, suggesting that maximising energetic efficiency and flying over well25 known landscapes, which may make immediate predator responses more effective, are prioritized over minimizing predation risk by flying across novel and unknown environments https://doi.org/10.32942/X2537V Life Sciences Anti-predator response, predator attack, RobotFalcon, landscape of fear, altitude, speed, route sinuosity., antipredator response, predator attack, RobotFalcon, landscape of fear, altitude, speed, route sinuosity Published: 2026-02-28 15:30 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

die_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00