Full text
7,420 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
WMD-Class Risk Without Explosives: Autonomous Coercion in Cyber Systems | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 8 January 2026 V1 Latest version Share on WMD-Class Risk Without Explosives: Autonomous Coercion in Cyber Systems Author : Francis X. Cunnane III 0009-0002-1146-2916 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176790707.76303170/v1 101 views 108 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This Work-in-Progress paper examines a class of emerging cyber systems whose catastrophic risk does not arise from physical destruction, denial of service, or kinetic effects, but from the capacity to impose persistent, scalable coercion without renewed human consent. Unlike traditional cyber weapons, which operate as discrete tools activated by identifiable actors, these systems exert influence continuously, shaping behavior, constraining options, and enforcing outcomes as an ambient condition of the digital environment. As a result, force is no longer episodic or exceptional, but infrastructural, echoing classic concerns about cybernetics, control, and social organization [1, 4]. We argue that existing cybersecurity, artificial intelligence safety, and cyber conflict frameworks inadequately address this risk because they remain grounded in action-centric models of harm. These models emphasize exploits, payloads, and events, while overlooking systems whose primary effect is the automation of authority itself, consistent with long-running arguments that technical and institutional artifacts can embody politics and governance [2, 3]. The paper characterizes the structural properties that give rise to autonomous coercion, distinguishes it from deterrence and defensive control, and analyzes catastrophic failure modes associated with loss of control, escalation through misinterpretation, erosion of consent, and irreversible embedding in critical digital infrastructure [6, 7]. Importantly, we show that such risks remain acute even when systems are designed with benevolent intentions such as stability, safety, or harm reduction, as humanitarian framing can accelerate normalization and lower deployment thresholds [8]. We intentionally avoid system design, implementation details, simulations, or case studies, and instead focus on risk recognition before operational capability exists. The paper proposes bright-line boundaries, termination conditions, and governance considerations for the Science of Security community, arguing that early restraint and non-proliferation principles represent the last low-cost intervention point [5, 12]. By naming autonomous coercion as a distinct WMD-class risk without explosives, this work invites interdisciplinary scrutiny and community feedback before continuous machine-mediated enforcement becomes an accepted feature of the digital landscape. Supplementary Material File (wmd.pdf) Download 131.59 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 08 January 2026 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Keywords accountability ai safety algorithmic control autonomous coercion computing and processing consent cyber systems escalation governance irreversible decisions science of security Authors Affiliations Francis X. Cunnane III 0009-0002-1146-2916 [email protected] View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 101 views 108 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Francis X. Cunnane III. WMD-Class Risk Without Explosives: Autonomous Coercion in Cyber Systems. Authorea . 08 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.176790707.76303170/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.176790707.76303170/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fdfd3ac2f43593a',t:'MTc3OTE1OTM2OQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.