Objective Analysis of Vaginal Ultrasound Video Clips for Exploring Uterine Peristalsis Post Vaginal and Cesarean Section Deliveries

The nonpregnant uterus is characterized by cyclic contractions that assist in sperm transport to the fallopian tube, embryo transport to implantation site, and expulsion of menstrual debris. The effect of post-Cesarean section (CS) scar on uterine peristalsis is unclear, while worldwide the prevalence of CS deliveries is increasing. In this study, we developed a new objective method for analysis of dynamic characteristics of the nonpregnant uterus from transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) recordings when the uterine cavity is not clearly observed, as may be the case in post-CS uteri. The method of active contours was utilized to detect the contours of the endometrium–myometrium interface (EMI) from sagittal cross-section TVUS images of nonpregnant uteri. The contours were straightened along the uterus centerline and registered with respect to the fundal end in order to reduce the noise due to movements of the physician and the participant. A dynamic analysis was conducted on these timedependent contours in order to explore the frequency and amplitude of the EMI motility. The analysis was conducted on TVUS video clips from 12 nonpregnant participants, 7 post-CS and 5 controls. The frequencies of the EMI motility was 0.010 to 0.064 Hz at days 8 to 17 in the control participants and 0.014 to 0.073 Hz at days 9 to 15 in post-CS participants. The maximal amplitude of motility was 0.67 to 2.00 mm and 0.48 to 2.58 mm for the control and post-CS participants, respectively. In this preliminary study, we have not observed significant difference between the EMI motility of healthy and post-CS uteri. Similar content being viewed by others

Wray S, Burdyga T, Noble D, Noble K, Borysova L, Arrowsmith S. Progress in understanding electro-mechanical signalling in the myometrium. Acta Physiol. 2015;213(2):417–431. Young RC. Mechanotransduction mechanisms for coordinating uterine contractions in human labor. Reproduction. 2016; 152(2):R51–R61. Eytan O, Jaffa AJ, Har-Toov J, Dalach E, Elad D. Dynamics of the intrauterine fluid–wall interface. Ann Biomed Eng. 1999;27(3): 372–379. Fusi L, Cloke B, Brosens JJ. The uterine junctional zone. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):479–491. Abbas K, Monaghan SD, Campbell I. Uterine physiology. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2011;12(3):108–110. Bulletti C, de Ziegler D, Polli V, Diotallevi L, Ferro ED, Flamigni C. Uterine contractility during the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(suppl 1):81–89. Kunz G, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4(suppl 3):5–9. Kunz G, Beil D, Deininger H, Wildt L, Leyendecker G. The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract: evidence from vaginal sonography of uterine peristalsis and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(3): 627–632. Wildt L, Kissler S, Licht P, Becker W. Sperm transport in the human female genital tract and its modulation by oxytocin as assessed by hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, hysterotonography, electrohysterography and Doppler sonography. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(5):655–666. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(4):529–538. Leyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(4):917–932. Meirzon D, Jaffa AJ, Gordon Z, Elad D. A new method for analysis of non-pregnant uterine peristalsis using transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(2):217–224. Fanchin R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1115–1119. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13(7):1968–1974. Kido A, Nishiura M, Togashi K, et al. A semiautomated technique for evaluation of uterine peristalsis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 21(3):249–257. Watanabe K, Kataoka M, Yano K, et al. Automated detection and measurement of uterine peristalsis in cine MR images: automated detection of uterine peristalsis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 42(3):644–650. Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Organization Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. O’Neill SM, Khashan AS, Henriksen TB, et al. Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(11):2560–2568. Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. Relationship between Cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2263. Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, et al. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1943–1952. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, van der Meulen JH, Templeton A. A population-based cohort study of the effect of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(6):1320–1326. O’Neill SM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, et al. Time to subsequent live birth according to mode of delivery in the first birth. BJOG. 2015;122(9):1207–1215. Eijsink JJ, van der Leeuw-Harmsen L, van der Linden PJ. Pregnancy after Caesarean section: fewer or later? Hum Reprod. 2008; 23(3):543–547. Evers EC, McDermott KC, Blomquist JL, Handa VL. Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(11): 2569–2574. Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, et al. Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1489–1496. Scott JR, Porter FT. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. GerigG,Kubler O, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA. Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(2):221–232. Perona P, Malik J. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1990; 12(3):629–639. Li B, Acton ST. Automatic active model initialization via Poisson inverse gradient. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008;17(8): 1406–1420. Li B, Acton ST. Active contour external force using vector field convolution for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007;16(8):2096–2106. Myers KM, Elad D. Biomechanics of the human uterus. WIREs Syst Biol Med. 2017:e1388. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1388. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Gora, S., Elad, D. & Jaffa, A.J. Objective Analysis of Vaginal Ultrasound Video Clips for Exploring Uterine Peristalsis Post Vaginal and Cesarean Section Deliveries. Reprod. Sci. 25, 899–908 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117697256 Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117697256