Abstract
Background Socioeconomic disparities have shaped COVID-19 outcomes worldwide. Focusing on disease consequences once infected (severity among cases), we examined whether area-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with hospitalisation and death among COVID-19 cases in Greater Sydney, Australia.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases recorded in the New South Wales Notifiable Conditions Information Management System from 2 March 2020 to 21 February 2022. Area-level disadvantage was measured using the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage (IRSD). We modelled the odds of (a) hospitalisation and (b) death conditional on infection using logistic regression, adjusting for age and gender.
Results
Among 782,883 included cases, 3.5% were hospitalised and 0.2% died due to COVID-19. Greater area-level disadvantage (lower IRSD) was associated with higher odds of hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.996 per IRSD point; 95% CI 0.996–0.996) and death (AOR 0.997; 95% CI 0.996–0.997), holding age and gender constant. For illustration, the difference between two Sydney postal areas with markedly different IRSD scores corresponds to several-fold differences in the odds of hospitalisation and death among cases.
Conclusions
Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with higher risks of hospitalisation and death among COVID-19 cases in Greater Sydney – a setting with public hospital care – indicating inequities in disease consequences once infected. Given the absence of individual-level comorbidity and vaccination data, the most plausible explanation is disparities in comorbidity and risk-factor burden, although contributions from differences in access to and quality of care cannot be ruled out. Public health responses should prioritise chronic-disease prevention and management in disadvantaged communities to mitigate inequitable outcomes in future pandemics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for the study was granted by the Sydney Local Health District Research Ethics and Governance Office on 11 December 2020 (Protocol No. X20-0467 and 2020/ETH02564).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
List of abbreviations
- AOR
- Adjusted odds ratio
- EFHIA
- Equity-focused health impact assessment ICU Intensive care unit
- IRSD
- Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage
- NCIMS
- Notifiable Conditions Information Management System NSW New South Wales
- PCR
- Polymerase chain reaction
- SARS-CoV-2
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- SEIFA
- Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas
- STROBE
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.