Increase of CD69, CD161 and CD94 on NK cells in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion and in vitro fertilization failure
This study found increased expression of CD69, CD94, and CD161 on NK cells in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion and in vitro fertilization failure compared to controls.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This case-control study investigated the expression of CD69, CD161, and CD94 markers on natural killer cells in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion or in vitro fertilization failure. Researchers analyzed peripheral blood samples from 23 patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion, 20 patients with in vitro fertilization failure, and 43 healthy control subjects using flow cytometry. The results demonstrated a significant increase in both the percentage of natural killer cells and the overall expression of these surface markers in both patient groups compared to their respective controls. The authors concluded that elevated CD69 and CD161 levels serve as potential immunological risk markers for these conditions, while noting uncertainty regarding the relevance of CD94 expression in endometrial natural killer cell activity. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,944 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (37)
- W112785316 via openalex
- W1513199102 via openalex
- W1534080163 via openalex
- W1543550363 via openalex
- W1546569067 via openalex
- W1549369158 via openalex
- W1557453109 via openalex
- W1562270544 via openalex
- W1579374155 via openalex
- W1654680019 via openalex
- W1918962518 via openalex
- W1972791118 via openalex
- W1980443486 via openalex
- W1982226943 via openalex
- W1989776554 via openalex
- W1993468096 via openalex
- W2023086378 via openalex
- W2024421037 via openalex
- W2029994329 via openalex
- W2061422374 via openalex
- W2064449233 via openalex
- W2073410000 via openalex
- W2087440289 via openalex
- W2094719443 via openalex
- W2100592302 via openalex
- W2107652077 via openalex
- W2111345544 via openalex
- W2122851786 via openalex
- W2124951764 via openalex
- W2127012130 via openalex
- W2127655644 via openalex
- W2127770041 via openalex
- W2157738049 via openalex
- W2161760518 via openalex
- W2184567779 via openalex
- W2395583360 via openalex
- W2993025987 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:14:02.509446+00:00