Diagnosis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia: evaluation of presence of intracellular organisms in Gram-stained sputum

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,693 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background: Bacteria that aren’t necessarily the primary causative agents of pneumonia may be detected in sputum culture tests. In the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia, Gram-stained sputum has demonstrated its utility. However, the evaluation for ICO has not been explored.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and evaluate whether the presence of ICO observed in Gram-stained sputum samples enhances the diagnostic certainty of pneumonia and aids in appropriate antimicrobial agent selection.

Methods

A retrospective, one: one matched case-control study was conducted from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2022. Participants: Patients who underwent sputum smear culture testing at Chiba University Hospital were included in the study.

Results

A total of 1,075 patients were enrolled in this study, with ICO positivity identified in 65 patients (6.0%). Among these, 30 patients (46.2%) with ICO positivity were diagnosed with pneumonia, while 21 patients (32.3%) with ICO negativity were diagnosed with pneumonia. No statistically significant difference was observed in the occurrence of pneumonia between ICO-positive and ICO-negative patients (p = 0.15, bootstrapped 95 % CI [-0.038, 0.305]). Furthermore, in cases of pneumonia, the presence of ICO did not yield a statistically significant difference in the efficacy of anti-MRSA medications (p = 0.32, bootstrapped 95 % CI [-0.434, 0.292]).

Conclusion

The presence of ICO in sputum samples did not demonstrate utility as a diagnostic marker for MRSA pneumonia or in the selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00