Robust ciliary flows protect early Xenopus embryos from pathogens independent of multiciliated cell patterning

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,720 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract During the early stages of development, the skin of the Xenopus embryo is covered by around two thousand evenly distributed multiciliated cells (MCCs). This striking spatial distribution is believed to maximise the generation of superficial flows at the scale of the embryo. However, the specific role of regular MCC distribution and the physiological function of vigorous ciliary activity remain elusive. We investigate the extent to which superficial flows provide protection against external pathogens before the immune system matures, by combining experimental and computational approaches. First, we cultivated epithelial explants in order to quantify the distribution of MCCs, beating frequencies, and three-dimensional fluid flows. We then use these data to validate a computational fluid dynamics model. Using this model, seeded with structural data from whole embryos, our simulations reveal that the collective ciliary beatings create a robust liquid shield along the embryonic flank, which is highly effective at clearing pathogens from the vicinity of the epithelial surface. Through parametric analyses, we further demonstrate that this protective function is remarkably resilient. Indeed, the effectiveness of pathogen clearance is primarily governed by the overall characteristic velocity of the cilia and is less affected by moderate variations in MCC density and spatial organisation. Our findings suggest that, rather than optimising energy consumption, the biological system prioritises functional robustness to ensure reliable protection. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Manuscript updated for clarification Author informations updated

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00