Cerebrospinal Fluid from Cytology Supernatant as a Liquid Biopsy Specimen for Diagnosis and Surveillance for Pediatric Primary Central Nervous System Tumors

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 4,770 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Assessing circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been proposed as a promising alternative to tissue biopsy. Advances in cfDNA sequencing have further underscored the potential of CSF liquid biopsies. CSF is routinely collected for cytologic evaluation at diagnosis, and at recurrence in both pediatric and adult central nervous system (CNS) tumors.

Methods

As part of a pilot study, CSF specimens were prospectively collected from seven pediatric patients with primary CNS malignant tumors. When possible, CSF was collected fresh and/or from processed cytology specimens. Low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a custom targeted sequencing panel were performed on the specimens to identify copy number alterations (CNAs), detect mutations, and estimate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fractions. Results were compared with matched tumor tissue molecular profiles and corresponding imaging findings.

Results

Abnormalities in cfDNA were detected in four patients. Sequencing of CSF cytology supernatants demonstrated the presence of circulating tumor DNA with characteristic CNAs and mutations that matched what was seen the tumor tissue as well as the fresh CSF specimens. These studies also revealed tumor heterogeneity and genomic evolution over time.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing routinely discarded supernatants from CSF cytology specimens for LP-WGS and targeted NGS. Our approach optimizes the use of CSF that may be limited in pediatric patients as a reliable source for liquid biopsy-based genomic studies. Future research will be necessary to optimize the methodology to enable clinical implementation. Key points Combined low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) can detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology supernatant samples. Our approach transforms clinically discarded specimens into a valuable and reliable source for liquid biopsy. LP-WGS and targeted NGS of CSF cytology-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is more sensitive than CSF cytology for tumor detection at initial diagnosis and during surveillance. Importance of Study This report highlights the feasibility of utilizing supernatants from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology specimens that would normally be discarded for diagnosis and follow up for patients with pediatric primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors, using the LBSeq4Kids combined low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsy platform. It optimizes the use of limited clinical specimens and maximizes diagnostic and research potential, yet does not pose additional risk to patients by utilizing routinely collected cytology specimens. Identification of copy number alterations (CNAs) and DNA sequence variants detected in CSF-derived cell-free DNA from patients with high grade glioma and embryonal tumors can augment tissue-derived molecular analyses. CSF liquid biopsy approaches have the potential to transform clinical practice for improved diagnosis, risk stratification, and disease surveillance. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study was funded by Alex Lemonade Stand Foundation. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Loma Linda University institutional review board I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability De-identified data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00