Can an apparent diffusion coefficient of uterine fibroid before uterine artery embolization predict potential fibroid response?
article
OA: gold
CC0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: ACOG guidance confirms the use of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) as an alternative to hysterectomy or myomectomy. The main objective of this article is to evaluate the ability of preoperative magnetic resonance ımaging (MRI) to study the relationship between uterine fibroid reduction and diffusion coefficient (ADC) value after UAE. This is a relevant topic with the growing interest in using ADC as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for monitoring tissue changes and predicting uterine fibroid response to UAE over the past years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective controlled non-randomized trial; uterine fibroid volume, fibroid diameter, uterine volume, fibroid ADC and normal myometrium ADC were recorded before and after UAE. Wilcoxon test was used in the analysis of the dependent quantitative data. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between post-UAE uterine volume, fibroid volume, and average fibroid diameter reduction and the patient's age, parity, gravidity, fibroid ADC and myometrial ADC before UAE. RESULTS: The mean fibroid volume reduction was 36.0% (range between 17.3-77.7%). Mean fibroid diameter, fibroid volume, uterine volume, and myometrium ADC values after UAE were significantly lower than before the procedure (p = 0.002, < 0.001, 0.001, 0.006 respectively), but the decrease in fibroid ADC is not significant. As a result decrease in fibroid volume was greater as pre-UAE fibroid ADC values increased, and that finding may contribute to the selection of the patients for the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The ADC value before UAE was positively correlated with fibroid volume reduction.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (32)
- W1870591762 via openalex
- W1970457859 via openalex
- W1976736334 via openalex
- W1977860664 via openalex
- W1979530620 via openalex
- W1998062691 via openalex
- W2001387158 via openalex
- W2007225174 via openalex
- W2013065616 via openalex
- W2013921565 via openalex
- W2014533944 via openalex
- W2048608938 via openalex
- W2053711852 via openalex
- W2062284976 via openalex
- W2072944847 via openalex
- W2073670906 via openalex
- W2077955294 via openalex
- W2113313274 via openalex
- W2114698566 via openalex
- W2134068782 via openalex
- W2142254601 via openalex
- W2159572077 via openalex
- W2313320488 via openalex
- W2513661658 via openalex
- W2697100744 via openalex
- W2787888503 via openalex
- W2911652180 via openalex
- W2912049116 via openalex
- W3120106258 via openalex
- W4252592216 via openalex
- W4253890724 via openalex
- W4293043486 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK