GWAS highlights the neuronal contribution to multiple sclerosis susceptibility

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 276,477 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
GWAS highlights the neuronal contribution to multiple sclerosis susceptibility | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article GWAS highlights the neuronal contribution to multiple sclerosis susceptibility Philip De Jager, Lu Zeng, Atlas Khan, Tsering Lama, Tanuja Chitnis, and 6 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5644532/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease affecting the brain and spinal cord. Genetic studies have identified many risk loci, that were thought to primarily impact immune cells and microglia. Here, we performed a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study with 20,831 MS and 729,220 control participants, identifying 236 susceptibility variants outside the Major Histocompatibility Complex, including four novel loci. We derived a polygenic score for MS and, optimized for European ancestry, it is informative for African-American and Latino participants. Integrating single-cell data from blood and brain tissue, we identified 76 genes affected by MS risk variants. Notably, while T cells showed the strongest enrichment, inhibitory neurons emerged as a key cell type. The expression of IL7 and STAT3 are affected only in inhibitory neurons, highlighting the importance of neuronal and glial dysfunction in MS susceptibility. Biological sciences/Genetics/Genetic association study/Genome-wide association studies Biological sciences/Genetics/Gene expression Biological sciences/Genetics/Gene regulation Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction The genetic architecture of multiple sclerosis (MS) has come into focus over the past decade. Efforts have been most successful around genetic susceptibility, with over 233 independent risk variants identified to date 1 , but a recent study reported one genome-wide significant severity locus 2 . While the functional consequences of some susceptibility variants have been characterized – such as the protective effect rs2300747-G 3 , 4 within the CD58 locus and the risk allele rs1800693-G in TNFRSF1A 5 - most of these variants remain poorly understood, and there have been few dedicated efforts to systematically map such effects 1 , 6 – 10 . Functional consequences of MS variants have been found primarily in peripheral immune cells and in microglia, the resident mesoderm-derived immune cell in the central nervous system 1 . While some effects have been noted in non-immune cells, such as astrocytes, in targeted analyses 11 – 13 , such studies highlight an important challenge in functional genomics as the effect of risk variants can be seen in multiple different cell types and subtypes, creating ambiguity about which cell type is the causal one or whether a combination of cell types is required. Further, the limited availability of quantitative trait locus mapping results in a cell-type specific manner outside of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) populations means that the extent of a variant’s effect beyond PBMC is largely unknown. Thus, despite some suggestions 14 – 16 , there is currently a dearth of evidence that neuroectodermal derivatives that make up the central nervous system are involved in the onset of MS. Rather, the predominance of an initial peripheral auto-inflammatory response is further supported by the fact that approximately half of MS susceptibility variants may be shared with one or more autoimmune disease 17 ; it appears that an important component of genetic susceptibility to MS involves dysregulated pathways that lead to a propensity for auto-reactive immune responses. Interestingly, among the shared loci, a large proportion have an opposite effect in other diseases (an MS risk allele is protective for another disease), and MS shares more susceptibility loci with certain auto-inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis (UC), celiac disease (CeD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis (PS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) than others 18 . While this portion of shared genetic susceptibility may be more readily understood functionally, the functional consequences of the other MS-specific half of susceptibility variants remains to be determined; it presumably contributes to the targeting of the auto-inflammatory process to the central nervous system instead of the skin, pancreas, joints, or other tissue. Here, we focused on systematically exploring the question of possible MS susceptibility variants exerting functional consequences only in neuronal and glial cell types. To properly power such a systematic evaluation genome-wide, we accessed our prior MS susceptibility results, expanding discovery meta-analysis with three new genome-wide datasets: the UK Biobank (UKBB) 19 , the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) 20 study, and the initial release of the All of US cohort (AoU) 21 . Our team has previously harmonized these three datasets 22 into a coherent dataset of 750,051 participants. This significantly expanded the GWAS as our prior study had only a targeted replication effort 1 . Further, these three cohorts have substantial numbers of diverse participants, allowing us to complete a multi-ancestry meta-analysis in MS and to pose some important questions about the relevance of MS susceptibility loci discovered among participants of European ancestry (EUR), African-American (AFR) and Admixed American (AMR). To identify potential causal MS genes, we integrated the extended EUR GWAS results with the gene expression data from EUR participants using a colocalization analysis (COLOC) across the six major cell types of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and 14 major cell types of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC). We then compared the effect of MS risk loci across 12 inflammatory diseases, four neurodegenerative diseases, four psychiatric disorders, and metabolic traits. Finally, we designed, optimized, and tested a genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) 23 for MS that maximizes performance across ancestries. We then conducted a hypothesis-free phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) to identify diseases/traits associated with the GPS, and examined the GPS associations with brain MRI data collected from MS patients (Fig. 1 ). Results New European ancestry GWAS meta-analysis for MS We first harmonized the genetic and phenotypic data available from the UKBB, eMERGE-III, and AoU datasets 22 , defining cases by ICD 9: 340, 323 and 341 ( Supplementary table S1 ). We then conducted a European ancestry GWAS meta-analysis (using METAL) 24 that includes a total of 5,063 MS cases and 596,340 controls (see Methods) ( Supplementary table S1 ). These results were subsequently combined with our prior meta-analysis 1 , increasing sample size to a total of 19,865 MS patients and 623,043 controls. Since the focus of this project was the evaluation of non-immune SNPs, we elected to exclude the extended Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region from our analysis (Chr6: 25,383,722 − 33,368,421bp in GRCh37). A total of 5,041 non-MHC SNPs exceeded a threshold of p < 5x10 − 8 in the new meta-analysis (Fig. 2 ); 99% of these SNPs showed a concordant direction of effect between the prior study 1 and the three new cohorts. Using linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based clumping methods, we identified 236 SNPs independently associated with MS susceptibility among the 5,041 significant SNPs. We then removed SNPs with r 2 > 0.1 and within ±500kb window of any of the 200 previously reported susceptibility variants 1 . A total of 38 SNPs were not in LD with the previously reported SNPs. Next, we defined novel MS genomic risk loci using non-overlapping genomic segments that contain at least one MS SNP, with the condition that MS SNPs in adjacent loci are more than 250 kb away from each other (that is, a 250-kb window on each side of one of the SNPs). This approach results in 4 loci that do not appear to have been reported previously as harboring MS susceptibility variants (Table 1 ). Therefore, most of the new independently associated variants (n = 34) fall within loci that harbor other MS susceptibility variants. We have also removed two susceptibility SNPs reported in our previous study (rs6498163 and rs11256593) due to an LD > 0.1 with other MS SNPs; in these cases, we kept the SNP within a pair that had the smaller p-value, which brings the total count of current MS susceptibility variants to 198 known and 38 novel variants, or 236 independent MS susceptibility effects, each of which is labeled by a lead SNP ( Supplementary table S2 ). We used the results of this new meta-analysis for all subsequent analyses. Table 1 GWAS meta-analysis uncovers 38 additional MS susceptibility variants in EUR, one in AFR and two in AMR. Locus CHR BP (GRCh37) Lead variant P value OR s.e. RA/OA RAF Gene 1 1 2701575 rs375915427 3.15×10 − 08 1.079 0.014 T/C 0.076 MMEL1, TTC34 2 1 85748811 rs529392609 2.63×10 − 10 2.063 0.115 G/A 0.999 3 1 85764886 rs11161589 6.12×10 − 12 1.042 0.006 G/A 0.403 CYR61, BCL10 4 1 92956978 rs113561235 3.60×10 − 08 1.101 0.018 T/C 0.029 5 1 92973242 rs79285232 5.85×10 − 11 1.202 0.028 C/T 0.017 6 1 93088923 rs72724541 1.26×10 − 11 1.136 0.019 A/G 0.025 GFI1 7 1 93291944 rs12042488 1.09×10 − 11 1.063 0.009 A/T 0.800 8 1 101289496 rs142860878 1.77×10 − 08 1.198 0.032 G/C 0.013 AC93157.1 9 1 101307053 rs12047318 4.93×10 − 10 1.070 0.011 G/A 0.922 AC93157.1, EXTL2 10 1 101544143 rs147885102 3.69×10 − 10 1.052 0.008 T/A 0.718 AC93157.1 11 1 157660829 rs77191363 7.86×10 − 09 1.078 0.013 C/G 0.946 FCRL3 12 2 30478386 rs4952115 4.31×10 − 09 1.048 0.008 G/T 0.836 LBH 13 2 61066666 rs1432295 2.74×10 − 08 1.033 0.006 G/A 0.432 REL 14 3 101661456 rs74482986 2.46×10 − 08 1.065 0.011 C/A 0.928 NXPE3 15 3 121770539 rs2255214 6.19×10 − 16 1.049 0.006 G/T 0.495 16 3 159702290 rs9858816 2.64×10 − 08 1.034 0.006 C/T 0.379 17 5 40393852 rs1992662 1.67×10 − 17 1.054 0.006 A/G 0.651 18 5 118815815 rs28762138 1.46×10 − 08 1.244 0.039 G/T 0.009 19 5 158944266 rs7727104 8.17×10 − 09 1.039 0.007 A/G 0.737 C1QTNF2 20 6 135749682 rs13218824 4.01×10 − 08 1.079 0.014 C/T 0.047 AHI1 21 6 135904197 rs76892387 1.44×10 − 08 1.085 0.014 G/A 0.044 AHI1 22 7 56091706 rs6975311* 5.30×10 − 09 1.039 0.007 G/A 0.727 23 9 4981602 rs10758669* 2.20×10 − 08 1.035 0.006 C/A 0.353 24 10 64384640 rs77051803 3.30×10 − 08 1.053 0.009 A/G 0.109 25 11 321235 rs56232455 1.78×10 − 08 1.042 0.007 A/G 0.443 RP11, IFITM3 26 11 60783062 rs75064517 6.85×10 − 09 1.121 0.020 G/A 0.035 CD6 27 11 60827933 rs11230581 5.55×10 − 15 1.048 0.006 T/C 0.582 CD6 28 11 72450091 rs77267834* 2.71×10 − 12 1.103 0.014 A/T 0.046 ARAP1, ATG16L2 29 14 88407917 rs12432149 4.08×10 − 12 1.041 0.006 A/G 0.512 GALC 30 16 11053656 rs117283010 3.07×10 − 16 1.131 0.015 A/G 0.062 31 16 11185464 rs55898143 1.38×10 − 13 1.081 0.011 T/C 0.085 32 16 11242497 rs794423 1.62×10 − 10 1.104 0.015 A/C 0.059 33 16 11247847 rs80207443 1.60×10 − 13 1.107 0.014 T/C 0.048 34 16 11335999 rs814260 9.30×10 − 09 1.036 0.006 G/A 0.360 35 16 11398467 rs10852332 4.02×10 − 09 1.043 0.007 C/G 0.213 36 17 40508559 rs58905292 1.96×10 − 09 1.106 0.017 A/T 0.049 STAT3 37 17 57963873 rs1292052 1.49×10 − 09 1.072 0.012 C/T 0.890 TUBD1 38 20 47253487 rs3935549* 1.62×10 − 08 1.034 0.006 C/T 0.506 Locus CHR BP (GRCh37) SNP P value OR s.e. RA/OA RAF Ancestry 1 9 1827489 rs76911648 3.28×10 − 9 3.169 0.20 G/C 0.035 AFR 5 5 18904547 rs59061674 4.00×10 − 8 3.461 0.23 G/A 0.038 AMR 6 15 77706452 rs113284638 3.82×10 − 8 2.689 0.18 C/A 0.063 AMR Table legend: The gene(s) were assigned on the basis of colocalization results and SNP-to-Gene linking strategies. OR, odds ration; RA/OA, risk/other allele; RAF: risk allele frequency using 1000 Genomes Project (1KG phase 3) EUR/AFR/AMR populations. *The asterisk highlights the susceptibility loci not previously associated with MS. Previous studies reported that multiple MS loci harbored more than one statistically independent effect that met a genome-wide significance threshold 1 . This pattern was also observed in our updated list of MS risk variants, where multiple independent associations were found at many loci, such as the DDX6-CXCR5 locus ( Supplementary fig. S1 ), which has also been implicated in other autoimmune diseases. For example, the variant rs12365699-G , located in the DDX6-CXCR5 locus, increased the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and lupus 25 – 27 . Multi-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis for MS Although the total number of AFR (614 cases and 62,044 controls) and AMR (352 cases and 44,133 controls) ancestry individuals identified by us across the three biobanks was large for an MS study, it remains modest for a GWAS. Our prior study of European ancestry participants required 1,000 MS cases to yield two loci meeting a threshold of genome-wide significance 28 . Nonetheless, we completed separate GWAS for these two populations aiming to identify ancestry-specific loci. Surprisingly, one new locus is genome-wide significant among AFR participants (rs76911648), its minor allele frequency (MAF) in EUR (MAF = 0.013) is lower compared to AFR (MAF = 0.035), and two new SNPs are significant among AMR participants (rs59061674, rs113284638) (Table 1 , fig. S2 ), where rs59061674 has a lower MAF in EUR (MAF = 0.010) than AMR (MAF = 0.038), while the rs113284638 showed a slightly higher MAF in EUR (MAF = 0.072) than AMR (MAF = 0.063). Given small sample size, these results should be viewed cautiously; in participants of European ancestry, none of these three SNPs have a p < 0.05. Further, they are not in LD with one of the significant SNPs described above. There are no additional non-European ancestry datasets available for replication, so these results will require validation in future more diverse cohorts. To be thorough, we next performed a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of a total of 20,831 MS cases (> 40% increase in the number of MS cases used in the previous GWAS 1 ), and 729,220 control participants using two methods: a multi-ancestry meta-regression implemented in MR-MEGA 29 and a random effects model implemented in PLINK v1.9 30 . No additional loci became significant in this slightly larger meta-analysis. When we took the list of 236 significant SNPs from the EUR meta-analysis, 184 SNPs were available in AFR, and 18 of these SNPs showed some evidence for replication among AFR participants (nominal P < 0.05, 14 with the same effect directions). In addition, 189 of the 236 SNPs could be tested in AMR participants, and 11 SNPs showed some evidence of association (P < 0.05, 9 with the same effect directions) ( Supplementary table S3 ). Thus, while dedicated studies of non-European populations are sorely needed, our results suggest that certain findings from European-ancestry meta-GWAS are also relevant to AFR and AMR populations, consistent with earlier studies 31 , 32 . Susceptibility alleles overlap between MS and other autoimmune diseases Next, we assessed the extent to which MS susceptibility was shared with other diseases. We assembled a list of SNPs that reached genome-wide significance (p < 5×10 − 8 ) in at least one of 12 autoimmune diseases using their publicly available genome-wide summary statistics (see details in Methods) 33 – 40 . Adding these SNPs to those meeting a threshold of genome-wide significance in our MS analysis, 32,901 SNPs were retained for a cross-disease analysis (Fig. 3 A). A single risk allele (rs3184504-T), a nonsynonymous SNP in the SH2B3 gene, exhibited the highest level of pleiotropy with concordant risk associations shared across seven autoimmune diseases ( Supplementary table S4 ), including multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, lupus, type 1 diabetes, celiac diseases, inflammatory bowel disease and thyroiditis. In addition, we identified 7,849 SNPs with associations shared between at least two autoimmune diseases, and we see decreasing numbers of SNPs that have some evidence of association in 3 more diseases, including 5 SNPs that may have a role in 6 diseases. To extend this analysis and better understand the pleiotropy of our MS variants, we next evaluated the behavior of our updated list of 236 MS susceptibility SNPs ( Supplementary table S2 ) in the results of other GWAS, including MS severity 2 , 12 autoimmune diseases 33 – 40 , four neurodegenerative diseases 41 – 44 , four psychiatric disorders/traits 45–48 , and three metabolic traits 49 , 50 ( Supplementary table S5 ). The analysis was run twice, using either a nominal significance level (p < 0.05) or a slightly more conservative threshold of p < 0.001. We partitioned the results into three groups: (1) SNPs showing the same direction of effect as MS in the other disease/trait, (2) SNPs showing the opposite direction with these phenotypes, and (3) SNPs that did not meet the threshold of significance (Fig. 3 B & C ). T1D and IBD had the most potential associations for our MS SNPs, with 87 and 73 of SNPs meeting a nominal threshold of significance (Fig. 3 B). In both cases, there was a clear skew for the sharing to occur in the same direction of effect, but a quarter of the MS variants had a flipped direction of effect in the other diseases. This pattern held true for the other autoimmune diseases and for the higher threshold of significance (Fig. 3 C), consistent with patterns seen in earlier studies 18 . The extent of sharing is dependent, in part, on the size of the GWAS for the non-MS trait, as some diseases still have relatively small GWAS or are underpowered, such as the MS severity GWAS, which returned only one significant locus 2 . Interestingly, we see a fair amount of sharing with the neuropsychiatric traits, more than with the neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimer’s disease is intriguing, given an apparent excess of inverse effects in the shared SNPs with MS (p < 0.05). The metabolic traits also harbor a notable amount of sharing. However, the direction of these variants seems relatively random, with ~ 50% of the variants having an inverse effect relative to the MS risk. Under the more stringent statistical significance cutoffs (p < 0.001), few of the MS SNPs were associated with the other traits, but the pattern among the autoimmune diseases was the same (Fig. 3 C). Figure 3 D presents the same results in a more granular form, where we filtered the MS risk variants that showed genome-wide significance in at least one of the 24 phenotypes utilized here: for example, the rs3184504-T allele in the SH2B3 locus consistently shows increased risk in MS, lupus, celiac disease, thyroiditis, psoriasis, RA, and IBD ( Supplementary table S4 ). We gain an appreciation of the complexity of the mechanisms of MS susceptibility: while a good portion of the variants clearly affect some aspect that yields a propensity to develop an autoimmune response, the substantial number of inverse effects highlight that the role of certain immune pathways is disease-specific. One example of this complexity is the STAT3 locus, in which rs1026916 reaches p < 10 − 28 in MS (Fig. 3 D) and has substantial evidence of being involved in psoriasis in the same direction, but this variant has attained genome-wide significance in IBD, UC, and CD in the opposite direction of effect relative to MS. Despite many shared autoimmune SNPs with MS, 50/236 were specific to MS at the most comprehensive threshold (p < 0.05) across the 12 autoimmune diseases, and 27 were specific to MS among all the phenotypes we tested. With the genome-wide summary statistics collected above, we then obtained the genetic correlations estimate from MS for the 325 pairwise combinations among the 25 phenotypes and compared the results to the LD score regression (LDSC) estimates (Fig. 3 E, Supplementary table S6 ) using an imputed reference panel including 1,217,312 quality-controlled HapMap3 SNPs 51 . This analysis suggests that MS is most similar to UC (rg = 0.250, p-value = 5.47×10 − 09 ), SLE (rg = 0.221, p-value = 1.00×10 − 04 , IBD (rg = 0.194, p-value = 3.60×10 − 06 ) and RA (rg = 0.150, p-value = 1.50×10 − 03 ), which is consistent with earlier studies 52 , 53 . Interestingly, we also found significant positive correlations between MS and neuroticism (rg = 0.090, p-value = 2.00×10 − 04 ). MS severity did not show any significant correlations with the traits we tested. This MS severity study is probably underpowered, and we will need larger studies to truly explore the possibility of shared genetic architecture between MS severity and other inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. Notably, IgA nephropathy, COPD, thyroiditis, IBD, and CD had a significant genetic correlation with the psychiatric disorders/traits we tested (Fig. 3 E). Polygenic score for multiple sclerosis Polygenic risk scores have emerged as tools with which to capture an individual’s inherited disease susceptibility. They may be useful for stratifying individuals in clinical trials, and for guiding primary prevention and management of individuals at high genetic risk for MS 54 . A genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) may also be used for discovery of the shared genetic architecture between MS and other unsuspected traits beyond inflammatory diseases. We rigorously approached the construction of such a score using our non-MHC SNPs. We developed our initial model in the combined IMSGC, UKBB, and AoU datasets. We reserved the eMERGE-III dataset to test the model. The flowchart summary of our analytical approach is provided in Fig. 4 A (see details in Methods). The GPS for MS was tested with adjustment for age, sex, genotyping batch, and genetic ancestry. As shown in Table 2 , the GPS was strongly associated with the risk of MS in the independent testing cohort of European ancestry, with an overall odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation of the GPS of 1.70 (95%CI:1.52–1.91, P = 1.37×10 − 19 ). The participants in the top 1% vs. the remaining 99% of MS-GPS had more than a 7-fold increased MS risk (95% CI: 4.37-12.00, P = 1.60×10 − 14 ). We additionally validated the risk score in two smaller testing cohorts of AMR and AFR ancestry. Although the magnitude of effect was decreased, the GPS was significantly associated with MS in both cohorts. The OR per standard deviation of the GPS was estimated at 1.46 (95%CI 1.10–1.94, P = 8.57×10 ⁻03 ) for AMR ancestry and 1.26 (95%CI 1.07–1.49, P = 5.64×10 ⁻03 ) for AFR ancestry (Table 2 ). Thus, while dedicated efforts in these populations are sorely needed to further improve the GPS performance, the current GPS is already validating across major ancestral populations found in North America. Table 2 Performance metrics for the genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) in MS. eMEGRE-III (Ancestries) Case/control OR per SD (95% CI), P-value AUC (Crude) PRS Threshold Odds ratio (95% CI), P value EUR (30%) Genetic Ancestry 287/22,796 1.70 (1.52–1.91), P = 1.37×10 − 19 0.7217 (0.6398) Top 20% vs. other 80% 2.62 (2.06–3.34), P = 3.71×10 − 15 Top 10% vs. other 90% 3.00 (2.28–3.95), P = 3.11×10 − 15 Top 5% vs. other 95% 4.14 (3.03–5.65), P = 4.45×10 − 19 Top 2% vs. other 98% 5.05 (3.3–7.75), P = 9.45×10 − 14 Top 1% vs. other 99% 7.24 (4.37-12) , P = 1.60×10 − 14 AFR Genetic Ancestry 142/15,600 1.26 (1.07–1.49), P = 0.00564 0.7458 (0.5543) Top 20% vs. other 80% 1.45 (0.99–2.13), P = 0.057 Top 10% vs. other 90% 1.53 (0.95–2.46), P = 0.079 Top 5% vs. other 95% 1.70 (0.93–3.11), P = 0.087 Top 2% vs. other 98% 1.73 (0.69–4.32), P = 0.241 Top 1% vs. other 99% 2.70 (0.96–7.61) , P = 0.060 AMR Genetic Ancestry 55/5,148 1.46 (1.10–1.94), P = 0.00857 0.7524 (0.5526) Top 20% vs. other 80% 1.41 (0.73–2.73), P = 0.308 Top 10% vs. other 90% 1.52 (0.63–3.66), P = 0.346 Top 5% vs. other 95% 2.14 (0.74–6.14), P = 0.159 Top 2% vs. other 98% 5.99 (2.02–17.8), P = 0.001 Top 1% vs. other 99% 9.87 (2.75–35.5) , P = 4.44×10 − 4 We then assessed phenome-wide associations of this GPS in a PheWAS based on eMERGE participants who were not included in the GPS design. This approach offers a complementary strategy to assess for unsuspected shared genetic architecture with a range of clinical traits across the entire phenome. In the well-powered analysis of participants with European ancestry, the GPS association with MS was strongly replicated (OR = 1.97, 95%CI:1.71–2.27, P = 1.35×10 − 21 , Fig. 4 B). We also found a GPS association with “other inflammatory demyelinating diseases” (OR = 1.67, 95%CI:1.36–2.04, P = 7.33×10 − 07 , Fig. 4 B). This poorly defined diagnostic group may harbor certain individuals with MS and contains conditions that share symptomatology with MS but have different immune mechanisms. Thus, there may be some overlap in genetic architecture with these less common entities. The association with “functional disorders of the bladder” (OR = 1.22, 95%CI:1.12–1.34, P = 7.59×10 − 06 , Fig. 4 B) was likely related to the fact that bladder dysfunction represents a common symptom of MS. No other diagnostic category was significantly associated with the MS GPS, suggesting that our GPS is fairly specific to MS. In the smaller AFR dataset, the association of the GPS with MS was also phenome-wide significant (OR = 1.62, 95%CI:1.31–2.01, P = 7.55×10 − 06 , Fig. 4 C), consistent with the earlier dedicated analysis. In the AMR cohorts with fewer cases, the association with MS was only nominally significant (OR = 1.51, 95%CI:1.01–2.26, P = 0.04, Fig. 4 D) likely due to low power. The GPS was also associated with “Congestive heart failure (CHF) NOS” (OR = 1.28, 95%CI:1.15–1.43, P = 1.08×10 − 05 , Fig. 4 D). MS has been reported to be linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure 55 , but given small sample size of the AMR cohort, and the absence of this association in AFR and EUR cohorts, this association may be spurious. We conclude that the GPS is associated with MS across different ancestral populations, but its predictive performance remains lower in non-European populations. Finally, we have tested our GPS in MS patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and genotype information using the data selected from the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of Multiple Sclerosis at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (CLIMB) study 56 (see details in Methods). A linear regression model was used to examine the associations between the GPS and brain tissue compartments adjusted for age at visit, sex, and top three ancestry PCs. We observed a nominally significant association between the GPS and lower white matter volume in the MS patients (p-value = 0.03) (Fig. 4 E ). However, no significant associations were found between MS-GPS and other MRI measurements. Functional characterization of MS variants using cell-type specific brain and blood eQTL Prior systematic evaluations of functional consequences of MS susceptibility variants 1 , 2 had revealed that MS SNPs affected gene expression in peripheral immune cells and microglia (a myeloid cell type that integrates the neurectoderm early in development). While some targeted investigations looked at astrocytes in relation to molecular pathways present in many cell types, there has been few systematic evaluation of MS genetic effects specific to CNS cell types in relation to MS susceptibility or severity 2 , 57 – 61 . Thus, we accessed our recent atlas of CNS cell type-specific eQTL effects generated from well-powered set of frozen postmortem human brain samples collected from the same brain region, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 62 . Further, we accessed a publicly available resource derived from PBMC samples 63 to map the effects of MS variants on peripheral immune cells as a contrast and to assess cell-type specificity of the functional consequences. Using these two references, we identified those MS susceptibility variants that are found in the vicinity of an eQTL in each of the tested blood and brain cell types and then assessed whether the two effects co-localize using Coloc (v5.1.0) (see Methods ). The results are shown in Fig. 5 A (Supplementary table S7) where, as expected, there are several colocalized effects (PP.H4 > 0.8) among blood-derived cells; this is consistent with prior reports that naïve T cells harbor the most of these MS-related functional consequences 64 , 65 . Most of these effects are shared among several cell types, but some – such as NR1D1 and MMEL1 – appear specific to naïve T cells (amongst the cells surveyed here). Further, we now demonstrate colocalization with microglial eQTL, which had been suspected from prior analyses that uncovered enrichment of microglial genes amongst genetically implicated MS susceptibility genes 1 , 6 . However, the most interesting new set of results involves the cell types that derive from the neurectoderm: the glial and neuronal cells. In our reference, the most numerous cell types are excitatory neurons; they also have the largest transcriptome and, hence, have the most eQTL effects compared to other CNS cell types that are less frequent in the cortex 62 . Despite this, inhibitory neurons harbor the most eQTLs that colocalize with MS susceptibility variants of any CNS cell type (n = 15) (Fig. 5 A & B & S3 ); this is more than the resident immune cells, the microglia (n = 6). Further, seven of these functional consequences to MS variants are unique to inhibitory neurons. We also see five other variants that have functional consequences only in excitatory neurons. Thus, neuronal cells seem to play an important role in the earliest events leading to the onset of MS. Figure 6 A &B zooms into two MS loci, STAT3 and IL7 , illustrating the co-localization of susceptibility and expression effects. These are well-studied cytokine-related genes involved in amplification of immune responses, with evidence that IL7-driven signaling occurs, in part, through STAT3 . Our comparative assessment of blood and brain cells indicates that these two functional consequences of MS variants may be mechanistically related and unique to inhibitory neurons. They may provide a bridge between the peripheral leukocyte-driven propensity for autoimmunity and the targeting of the CNS by peripheral immune dysfunction, as neuronal cells respond differently to inflammatory stimuli. Further work is needed to understand how these two functional consequences intersect with the other neuronal-specific effects (in excitatory as well as inhibitory neurons). While neurons harbor the most functional consequences of MS variants, each of the glial cell types harbor some such effects, including some that are specific to astrocytes ( KCTD13 and RRAS2 ) and oligodendrocytes ( PHGDH and SYNGR1 ), for example. A previous report implicated an MS variant near the NFKB1 gene in altered immune responses in astrocytes; however, this SNP is not found to alter gene expression in our brain datasets 66 . We note that the pathognomonic feature of multiple sclerosis at its onset is the presence of inflammatory demyelination, which targets the myelin sheath produced by oligodendrocytes. Thus, while some of the MS loci may finally connect the peripheral immune dysfunction to a well-validated target cell type, many more loci implicate neuronal cells, and this may provide insights into the neurodegenerative component of the disease, which is apparent as brain atrophy early on 67 , 68 but presents clinically only much later. Replication of colocalized eQTL & epigenomic assessment We accessed additional single-nucleus datasets, and, as shown in Fig. 6 C-E, and the STAT3 RNA expression effect in inhibitory neurons is robust, being reproducibly found in two other datasets 69 . The rs1026916 A risk allele is associated with decreased gene expression using our original dataset (CUMC study 1) 62 , data from colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 69 , and a new snucRNAseq dataset (CUMC study 2). In addition, we identified eQTL-eGene effects in multiple corresponding cell types ( Supplementary table S8 ). For example, rs4896153 is an eQTL associated with AHI1 in microglia, and rs6032662 is associated with SLC12A5 in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Reviewing reference epigenomic profiles 70 , we found that most of our top prioritized variants (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table S7 ) are not located in segments of open chromatin in the cell types implicated by the eQTL analyses. However, one SNP, rs3923387, tags a genetic effect near the PLEC gene that influences (1) MS susceptibility, (2) the accessibility of chromatin in a nearby chromosomal segment (GRCh37 chr8:145034681–145035181) in microglia (colocalization of MS susceptibility PP.H4 = 0.84), and (3) the expression of the PLEC gene in the same cell type (as shown in Fig. 5 , colocalization of the ATAC QTL and eQTL PP.H4 = 0.93 ( Supplementary fig. S4 ). This result illustrates the next phase of our consortium’s work, generation of improved, cell-resolved, multi-omic data to map the propagation of effects from the MS susceptibility variants. Finally, to extend the narrative, we also confirmed the expression of STAT3 protein in inhibitory neurons using immunofluorescence in DLPFC tissue sections of a post-mortem MS individual obtained from the New York Brain Bank (NYBB). We observed that STAT3 is expressed in GAD1 + GAD2 + inhibitory neuron cells, with 2.8% of these neurons showing elevated STAT3 expression (> 2SD) (Fig. 6 F and S5). However, no significant differences in neuronal morphology, including compactness and shape, were observed between STAT3-expressing inhibitory neurons and those lacking STAT3 expression. Discussion In an updated MS GWAS analysis of 19,865 MS cases with genome-wide genotype data, we identified 38 novel MS risk variants and four novel genomic loci involved in MS susceptibility. Combined with SNPs generated from previous studies 1 , our consortium has reported a total of 236 independent non-MHC MS risk variants identified in participants of European ancestry. We have also conducted a multi-ancestry MS GWAS, including AFR and AMR ancestry participants. Although the sample size of the diverse participants is small, we uncovered one locus that reached genome-wide significance among AFR participants and two loci among AMR participants. These results should be considered cautiously until further evidence of replication emerges, given the small size of their discovery analyses. Our rigorously derived GPS provides a new tool for the community to investigate the role of genetic predisposition to MS in other datasets and contexts. Interestingly, while it requires additional optimizations for use in non-European populations, our results suggest that the current version already has some predictive capacity among individuals of AFR and AMR ancestry, consistent with earlier reports 71 , 72 . There is a pressing need for larger studies in non-European ancestry groups to ensure that any future clinical utility is broadly applicable. Given the strong but complex role of the MHC in MS, inclusion of susceptibility variants from that region will further improve the prediction in European populations but may be less informative in diverse population given the rapid and copmplex evoluation of the MHC which harbors many population-specific effects. Using our updated MS results, we sought to classify our susceptibility variants functionally. In one approach, we accessed the results of other GWAS to identify those variants that may affect susceptibility by altering more general mechanisms that lead to a propensity for autoimmunity. This hypothesis is consistent with epidemiological studies reporting a higher prevalence of other autoimmune diseases in persons with MS, such as T1D, thyroid disease, and inflammatory bowel disease 73 , 74 as well as the existence of families with members affected by different autoimmune diseases 75 . However, the story is not that simple, as there does not appear to be a clear “global genetic risk for autoimmunity”: The rs3184504 variant in the SH2B3 locus offers a good illustration, as its risk allele “T” was found associated with increased risk of celiac disease, IBD, MS, psoriasis, lupus, T1D and thyroiditis. The SH2B3 gene encodes the Src homology 2 adaptor protein 3, which regulates inflammation, immunity, and blood cell production. Certain genetic variants of SH2B3 can cause it to fail to control an overactive immune response, which can lead to autoimmunity 76 . It was also reported to be associated with immunoglobulin levels and multiple other non-immune traits; it displayed a high degree of pleiotropy, being associated with 79 different GWAS traits 77 . Overall, our results support shared autoimmune mechanisms 52 , where we show that a substantial proportion of shared loci harbor pleiotropic effects influencing risk to MS and other autoimmune diseases. We thus found that 186 of the 236 variants have some evidence of association with another autoimmune disease using the most inclusive threshold. This suggests that the remaining 50 variants may have a role in other processes that relate to targeting the propensity for an autoimmune process towards the target organ, in our case, the brain and spinal cord. Prior work had clearly demonstrated that the peripheral immune system harbors the functional consequences of many variants. While CD4 + T cells were strongly implicated, all other bone marrow-derived cells and microglia were also found to harbor at least some of the effects of susceptibility variants 1 , 2 in these analyses. The role of CNS cells was unclear, with a potential but ambiguous association with SLC12A5 expression in brain transcriptomic data and functional consequences of the six MS variants in astrocytes that perturbed the NF-κB pathway. This pathway is also implicated in many immune cells, and current MS treatments are found to be directly or indirectly linked to NF-κB pathways, modulating both the innate and adaptive immune system in patients 78 – 80 . Here, our co-localization analysis showed that CD4 + Naïve T cells harbor the largest number of cases where the same variant influences MS susceptibility and RNA expression, consistent with previous studies. Surprisingly, we found that inhibitory neurons showed the most colocalization signals among CNS cell types, followed by excitatory neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, and most of the colocalized signals in neurons are unique to this cell type (when compared to cortical and bone-marrow-derived cells). For example, STAT3 and IL7 illustrate loci with evidence of co-localization of susceptibility and expression effects only in inhibitory neurons. These are well-studied cytokine-related genes that are involved in the amplification of immune responses, with evidence that IL7 -driven signaling occurs, in part, through STAT3 81 . Thus, these two loci implicate a specific molecular pathway in the onset of MS through perturbation of neuronal function. Another example is ZHX3 in excitatory neurons, ZHX 3 is a member of a family of transcriptional repressors that are involved in neural progenitor maintenance, hematopoietic cell development, and differentiation. Dysfunction of ZHX family members is linked to the development and progression of neurological disease 82 . Our comparative assessment of blood and brain cells, therefore, prioritizes a subset of MS variants that implicate CNS parenchymal cells in disease onset. Clearly, perturbed pathways that lead to a propensity to autoimmune reactions are interacting with perturbed immune responses in neurons and glial cells to initiate autoreactive cells that lead to both recurrent bouts of inflammatory demyelination and a slowly progressive neurodegenerative process that remains poorly understood. The predilection of inhibitory neurons as a target for these risk variants is intriguing, particularly given the recent report that inhibitory neurons appear to be lost preferentially in the MS brain 83 . With our observations, we can now generate hypotheses to explore the downstream molecular and functional changes elicited by the variants in the cell type in which they are implicated. The role of the adaptive immune system is well established in MS, while CD8 + T cells are most abundant in the white matter of MS brain 84 . The CD4 + T cells probably play a role that is as important given the convergence of genetic susceptibility effects in this cell type and earlier studies 85 . Our data here suggest direct interactions between T cells and neurons or glia may be important to trigger the onset of MS through both classes of lymphocytes, elaborating a rich literature of immune responses expressed by neuroglial cells 86 , 87 . More broadly, it is likely that tissue-specific cells are likely to play a similar role in other inflammatory diseases. In summary, these results advance our understanding of the biological etiology of MS, refocusing our efforts on understanding the onset of the disease to include specific molecular pathways in the brain. While most loci have functional consequences in a variety of immune cell types, our study prioritizes understanding the unsuspected neuronal contribution to the onset of MS. They alter our conceptualization and approach to primary prevention and treatment of MS, which may have to include interventions targeting the central nervous system pathways. Methods and Materials Study design This cross-sectional study involves a combined analysis of the UKBB, eMERGE-III, and AoU cohorts. All participants provided informed consent to participate in genetic studies. Each cohort was first analyzed separately, and cohort-specific results were combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis. UK Biobank (UKBB) The UKBB is a longitudinal cohort of individuals ages 40–69 years at enrollment, recruited between 2006 and 2010 across the United Kingdom 19 . The individuals recruited to UKBB signed an electronic consent to allow the broad sharing of their anonymized data for health-related research. UKBB generated and released SNP microarray, exome sequence, and structured EHR data for 488,377 participants. The cohort is 54% female, with a mean age of 57 years, and the composition is 94% Europeans, 2% West or Southeast Asians, and 2% African ancestry by self-report 19 ( Supplementary table S1 ). SNP microarray data The details of the UKBB microarray genotyping, imputation, and quality control are available elsewhere 19 . Briefly, using the UKBB Axiom Array (N = 438,427) and UK BiLEVE Axiom Array (N = 49,950), a total of 488,377 participants have been genotyped for 805,426 overlapping markers. The 1000 Genomes, UK10K, and Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) reference panels were used to perform genome-wide imputation using IMPUTE2 software 88 , 89 . We performed post-imputation quality control analyses as described in our previous work based on this dataset 90 retaining 9,233,643 common (i.e., Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) > 0.01), high-quality (imputation R2 > 0.80) variants for the purpose of GPS calculation. To eliminate any potential confounding by close familial relationships, we excluded cryptically related individuals (kinship coefficient > 0.0442) 91 from downstream analyses. Genetic ancestry analysis We used the UKBB genotype array data for principal component analysis (PCA). We first pruned the genotype data using the plink command ‘--indep-pairwise 500 50 0.05’. We then used FlashPCA 92 based on 35,091 pruned variants. We merged the UKBB samples with 2504 participants of the 1000 Genomes Project (1KG phase 3) 93 and kept only shared variants between the two datasets. Then, we used a random forest machine learning based on 10 principal components to train ancestry classifiers using 1KG labeled data. Finally, we used the trained model to predict the genetic ancestry of the UKBB samples ( Supplementary fig. S6a ). All of Us (AoU) The AoU research program launched recruitment in 2018 across 340 sites across the United States, and over 372,380 participants were enrolled by 2022. AoU combines participant-derived data from surveys such as self-reported health information, physical measurements, electronic health records, and biospecimens. We analyzed the AoU data on Workbench, a cloud-based environment 21 . The second release data included N = 312,944 participants with complete SNP microarray, genome sequencing data, and phenotype information. The participants included 60% female, the mean age was 55 years, and consisted of 53% European, 4% Asian, and 21% Black/African American race by self-report. In addition, 17% of the cohort self-reported Hispanic/Latinx ancestry ( Supplementary table S1 ). SNP microarray genotype data All participants were genotyped with the Illumina Global Diversity Array (GDA). This microarray contains 1,904,679 SNVs and 44,172 indels. First, we performed genome-wide imputation analysis on the Workbench platform. Before imputation, we excluded all variants with MAF less than or equal to 0.005 (671,685 variants) or genotype missingness rate greater than or equal to 0.05 (41,526 variants). The genomic positions were lifted over from human GRCh38 to hg19 for 96% of SNPs. We then adopted the TopMed pre-imputation quality control (QC) pipeline to correct allele designations and remove poorly mapping variants 94 . After QC, we used 1,191,468 variants for imputation. To reduce RAM usage and increase speed, we split the 312,944 subjects with microarray data into 8 equal batches and then imputed each batch separately. After pre-phasing with EAGLE v.2 95 , we imputed missing genotypes using the Minimac4 88 and 1KG phase 3v5 93 reference panel. A total of 43,371,225 autosomal variants were imputed in 312,944 individuals. We then merged the eight batches based on position using VCFtools software with the command ‘vcftools --gzvcf --positions --recode --recode-INFO-all –stdout’. MAFs for the imputed markers were closely correlated (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.96) with the MAFs for the 1KG dataset. Genetic ancestry analysis Similar to the UKBB data, we first pruned the genetic data using the command ‘--indep-pairwise 500 50 0.05’ in PLINK 96 and used N = 36,358 pruned variants for kinship and ancestry analysis. Using KING software 91 , we removed 270 samples with pairwise kinship coefficients > 0.35. We then merged our AoU samples with 1KG samples, kept only SNPs in common between the two datasets, calculated PCs for the 1KG samples, and projected each of our samples onto those PCs. We then used a random forest-based machine learning approach to assign a continental ancestry group to each AoU sample. Briefly, we trained and tested the random forest algorithm on 1KG subjects with known labels. We trained the random forest model using 10 PCs as a labeled feature matrix. Then, we used our trained random forest model to predict the genetic ancestries for the AoU dataset ( Supplementary table S1 and Supplementary fig. S6b ). eMERGE-III The eMERGE network provides access to electronic health record information linked to GWAS data for 102,138 individuals recruited in 3 phases (eMERGE-I, II, and III) across 12 participating medical centers from 2007 to 2019 (54% female, mean age 69 years, 76% European, 15% African-American, 6% Latinx and 1% East or southeast Asian by self-report) 97 , 98 . All individuals were genotyped genome-wide; details on genotyping and quality control analyses have been described previously 97 , 98 . All GWAS datasets were briefly imputed using the multiethnic Haplotype Reference Consortium panel on the Michigan Imputation Server 99 . The imputation was performed in 81 batches. We included only markers with a MAF ≥ 0.01 and R2 ≥ 0.8 in ≥ 75% of batches post-imputation. A total of 7,529,684 variants were retained for the GPS analysis. For PCA, we used FlashPCA 92 on a set of 48,509 common (MAF ≥ 0.01) and independent variants (pruned in PLINK with the --indep-pairwise 500 50 0.05 command). The analyses were performed using a combination of VCFtools v.0.1.13 100 and PLINK v.1.9 96 . Similar to UKBB and AoU, we defined the genetic ancestry for eMERGE based on random forest ( Supplementary fig. S6c) . MS phenotyping and case-control definitions The MS phenotype was defined using ICD codes from the UKBB, eMERGE-III, and AoU datasets. Cases were identified by at least one occurrence of the following ICD codes: ICD-9: 340, 323, or 341. Participants without any of these codes were classified as controls. Meta-GWAS The MHC is the most gene-dense and most polymorphic part of the human genome. The region exhibits haplotype-specific linkage disequilibrium patterns, extreme structural variation and copy number variations, and an extremely high level of genetic diversity; the use of a single reference sequence to analyze GWAS data in this area is problematic 101 . Therefore, the Extended MHC region (xMHC) is set aside in our meta-analysis (defined as the regions between HIST1H2AA and RPL12P1 genes: chr6: 25,383,722 − 33,368,421Mb; ~7.6Mb, GRCh37), resulting in ~ 68,000 SNPs located in xMHC were removed for further analysis. We first performed a meta-analysis using an inverse-variance-weighted fixed-effects model in METAL (version 2011-03-25) 24 combining UKBB, AoU, and eMERGE-III cohorts for European ancestry (5,063 MS cases and 596,340 controls), African-American (614 MS cases and 62,044 controls) and Hispanic American (352 MS cases and 44,133 controls) populations, respectively. In addition, another meta-analysis using METAL was performed exclusively for the European ancestry cohort, which included the GWAS summary statistics from the IMSGC discovery cohort 1 , along with UKBB, AoU, and eMERGE-III (19,865 MS cases and 623,043 controls). A genome-wide significant locus was defined as the region around a SNP with P 0.1, within a 500-kb window, using the reference panel from phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project as the reference population. Two models were used to conduct multi-ancestry meta-analyses (20,831 MS cases and 729,220 controls). Random effects models were performed using PLINK v1.9 96 , while a separate analysis was performed using MR-MEGA v0.2 29 . PLINK v1.9 was preferred over METAL due to its capacity to perform random effects analyses in parallel. A random effects model provides a more conservative framework that allows each study to have unique effects, as expected in different populations. MR-MEGA was also employed since it is well-powered to detect associations at loci with allelic heterogeneity. MR-MEGA models allelic effects as a function of axes of genetic variation that are derived from the input GWAS summary statistics. This method can result in reduced variant sets since it requires that variants have sufficient overlap between the input datasets (K > 3), where K is the number of inputs GWAS, in contrast to random effects models implemented in PLINK v1.9, which were limited to K > 2 to quantify heterogeneity accurately. To identify novel genomic risk loci, LD blocks of independent significant SNPs (R 2 > 0.1, ±500kb, 1KG phase 3) were merged into a single genomic locus if the distance between LD blocks was less than 250 kb. These loci were compared to the previous GWAS 1 to assess whether these regions were known to be associated with MS. There was no evidence of stratification artifacts or uncontrolled inflation of test statistics in the results from any cohort (λ GC = 1.02–1.14 Supplementary fig. S2 ). Conditional analysis To identify secondary association signals, we used the program GCTA-COJO 102 to perform conditional analysis on the summary meta-analysis. GCTA-COJO (--cojo-cond) performs a secondary association analysis conditioned on discovered top variants; such conditional analysis is conducted with GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics rather than individual-level data of the full sample. Summary Statistics for Autoimmune Diseases and Other Traits We downloaded complete summary statistics for autoimmune and inflammatory disease GWAS available in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics ) and PubMed ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ ) ( Supplementary table S5 ). We focused on European ancestry studies with at least 2,000 study participants for which signed summary statistics were available. We chose the study with the largest cohort size, where multiple studies were available for a given trait. By applying these filters, we obtained GWAS statistics for the IgA nephropathy (IGA) 33 , Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 34 , Obesity (OB) 34 , Psoriasis (PS) 35 , Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) 36 , Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) 37 , Type 1 diabetes (T1D) 38 , Thyroiditis (TRD) 33 , Celiac disease(CeD) 39 , Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which IBD summary statistics also included results for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis 40 . We have also downloaded four neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer's disease (AD) 41 , Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) 42 , Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) 43 , Parkinson's disease (PD) 44 , four psychiatric disorders/traits: Bipolar disorder (BIP) 45 , Major depressive disorder (MDD) 46 , Neuroticism (Neuro) 47 , Schizophrenia (SCZ) 48 , and three metabolic traits: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) 49 , Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio adjusted BMI (WHRadjBMI) 50 . Given that most of the GWAS we collected were conducted in participants of European ancestry, we used the results of updated MS GWAS summary statistics in European ancestry for this analysis. We removed the Extended MHC region (xMHC) region from the summary statistics (defined as the regions between HIST1H2AA and RPL12P1 genes: chr6: 25,383,722 − 33,368,421Mb; ~7.6Mb, GRCh37). We then removed indels and SNPs inconsistent with the 1000 Genomes Project (phase 3) reference panel and filtered for strand-unambiguous biallelic SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.01 in the 1000 Genomes European (EUR) reference individuals. Cross-trait LD score regression LDSC 103 bivariate genetic correlations attributed to genome-wide SNPs (rg) were estimated across 25 human diseases/traits from published GWASs, as mentioned above. We used LD scores from the ‘eur_w_ld_chr’ file available from https://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/LDSCORE , computed using 1000 Genomes Project 93 Europeans as a reference panel 104 . FDR < 0.05 was used to define significant genetic correlations by adjusting for the number of traits tested. Genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) design and optimization We used PRS-CSx, a Bayesian polygenic modeling framework, to develop genomic prediction scores (GPS) across diverse ancestries 23 . PRS-CSx integrates GWAS summary statistics from multiple populations, accounting for population-specific linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns. Specifically, we utilized GWAS summary statistics from three ancestral groups: African (AFR), European (EUR), and Admixed American (AMR), and combined them using the ‘meta’ setting in PRS-CSx. In our study, 70% of the training data consisted of individuals of European ancestry from the eMERGE cohort (615 MS cases and 53,250 controls) to optimize model selection. To ensure no overlap between the GWAS discovery cohort and the GPS development dataset, the eMERGE dataset was excluded from the MS GWAS discovery cohort. We evaluated model robustness by running PRS-CSx with different values of the global shrinkage parameter: 1, 10⁻¹, 10⁻², 10⁻⁴, 10⁻⁶, and 10⁻⁸. The final GPS was selected based on the best-performing model for the training dataset ( Supplementary table S9 ). The score was standardized to zero mean and unit variance based on ancestry-matched population controls. In the optimization dataset, the shrinkage parameter (10 − 4 ) explained 2% of the variance (R2), with 1 s.d. of the score increasing MS risk by 62% (odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.49–1.75, P < 5.33 × 10 − 32 ) after controlling for age, sex, batch effects, and four genetic PCs. The final PRS-CSx output included 1,161,784 HapMap3 105 variants and their weights. PheWAS The derived polygenic predictors for MS were used to score all 102,138 eMERGE participants with available genotypes and electronic health record (EHR) data. To test the association of these polygenic predictors with diseases in a phenome-wide manner, we first harmonized the diagnostic data by converting all available ICD-10-CM codes to the ICD-9-CM system. A total of 102,138 genotyped eMERGE participants had 20,783 unique ICD-9 codes, which were subsequently mapped to 1,817 distinct phecodes. Phenome-wide association analyses (PheWAS) were conducted using the PheWAS R package 106 , which applies predefined control groups for each phecode. For case definition, at least two occurrences of ICD-9 codes within the case grouping of each phecode were required. Logistic regression was used to test associations between the MS polygenic score and each of the 1,817 phecodes, with case-control status as the outcome. The polygenic score for MS was adjusted for age, sex, study site, and ancestry's first three principal components (PCs). We applied a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing to determine statistically significant disease associations, setting the significance threshold at 2.75 × 10 − 5 (0.05 divided by 1,817). MRI analysis Multiple sclerosis (MS) participants were from the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of Multiple Sclerosis at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (CLIMB) study 56 . CLIMB is a natural history observational study of MS in which participants undergo semi-annual neurological examinations and annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MS lesions and brain tissue compartments (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) were segmented using template-driven segmentation and partial volume artifact correction (TDS+) method 107 . Results underwent quality control and manual correction where necessary 108 ( Supplementary fig. S7 ). MRI and genome-wide genotyping data were available for 145 MS patients; 136 of them were European ancestry, 7 were AFR ancestry, and 2 were Hispanics. Among them, 130 are diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, and 15 are clinically isolated syndrome. GPS score for each participant was calculated using the PLINK command ‘--bfile --score sum –out’ 96 , and a regression model was used to test the association between GPS and MRI, adjusted for age at visit, sex, and top three genotype PCs. Colocalization analysis The COLOC package (version 5.1.0) 109 was applied to test the approximate Bayes factor (ABF) colocalization hypothesis, which assumes a single causal variant. Under ABF analysis, the association of a trait with a SNP is assessed by calculating the posterior probability (value from 0 to 1), with the value of 1 indicating the causal SNP. In addition, the ABF analysis has 5 hypotheses, where, PP.H0.abf indicates there is neither an eQTL nor a GWAS signal at the loci; PP.H1.abf indicates the locus is only associated with the GWAS; PP.H2.abf indicates the locus is only associated with the eQTL; PP.H3.abf indicates that both the GWAS and eQTL are associated but to a different genetic variant; PP.H4.abf indicates that the eQTL and the GWAS are associated to the same genetic variant. With the posterior probability of each SNP and aiming to find the casual variants between the GWAS and eQTL, we focused on extracting the PP.H4 value for each SNP in our study. For MS GWAS, we used the reported lead SNPs of 236 loci. For each locus, we searched for the eSNPs that are within 500 KB of the lead SNP, and listed eGenes that were paired with the eSNP. We then obtained the eGenes cis-eQTL output around the lead eSNP within 1 Mbp window size. In addition, we extracted GWAS summary statistics around the reported 236 lead SNP. At last, we conducted COLOC for respective pair of eGene-eQTL and eSNP-GWAS for each cell type, using eQTL summary statistics from the OneK1K cohort (982 PBMC samples, 14 blood cell types, browsable results are available at www.onek1k.org ) 63 and ROSMAP (424 DLPFC samples, 6 brain cell types, https://doi.org/10.7303/syn52335732 ) cohort 62 . Immunohistochemistry staining for STAT3 and Glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1) + Glutamate decarboxylase 2 (GAD2) For validation immunostaining, a six µm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue section from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann Area 9) of an MS individual was obtained from the New York Brain Bank at Columbia University. The tissue was stained with NeuN (1:100, 488 channel, Invitrogen, cat.# PA5-80745), STAT3 (1:100, 488 channel, Abcam cat.# ab20181), and GAD1 + GAD2 (1:100, 647 channel, Wako cat.# 01919741). The FFPE tissue section was deparaffinized using CitriSolv (d-limonene, Decon Laboratories, Inc. cat.# 1601H) as a clearing agent for 20 minutes. The section was rehydrated and prepared for staining through a series of graded ethanol washes. Heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (pH = 6, Sigma-Aldrich catalog no. C9999) using a microwave (800W, 30% power setting) for 25 minutes. Following this, the section was blocked for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT) using a Bovine Serum Albumin-blocking medium (BSA, 3%, Sigma-Aldrich, catalog no. A7906) to minimize non-specific antibody binding. The section was incubated overnight with the primary antibodies (anti-STAT3 and anti-GAD1 + GAD2) at 4°C. After washing, the tissues were incubated for one hour with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500, Alexa Fluor 488 and 568, Invitrogen, catalog no. A21206, A21202, A21447) to bind to the primary antibody for protein detection and signal enhancement. After washing, the slides were again incubated in 3% BSA for 30 min and stained with the NeuN-conjugated-647 antibody. After incubation, the section was washed and treated with True Black Lipofuscin Autofluorescence Quencher for 2 minutes at RT to minimize endogenous autofluorescence. An anti-fading DAPI mounting agent (347 channel, Invitrogen, catalog no. P36931) was used to coverslip. Images were acquired using the Nikon Eclipse Ni-E immunofluorescence microscope at a magnification of ×20), and approximately 44 pictures were acquired from the MS individual. The captured images were analysed using CellProfiler 110 software. An extensive pipeline has been developed to automatically segment the Neurons and detect STAT3 expressed by GAD1 + and GAD2 + cells 111 . DAPI and NeuN was defined as the primary object using the “IdentifyPrimaryObjects” module. The Robust Background method was used for thresholding. The typical diameter for DAPI objects was set to range between 15 and 80 pixels and between 30 and 80 pixels for NEUN objects. Then, the 'RelateObjects' module was applied to filter NEUN objects positive for DAPI objects (NEUN + DAPI+). The module “IdentifyPrimaryObjects” was used to segment GAD1/GAD2 + cells, using the Robust Background as the thresholding method, with a typical diameter ranging from 30 to 80 pixels. The segmented GAD1/GAD2 + objects were related to NEUN + DAPI + filter GAD1/GAD2 + NEUN + DAPI + objects. The STAT3 intensity was measured within the GAD1/GAD2 + NEUN + DAPI + objects. Declarations Acknowledgements We thank the participants who donated their time, life experiences and DNA to this research and the clinical and scientific teams that worked with them. Funding: This work was funded by NIH grant nos. U01 AG061356 and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health’s Accelerating Medicines Program (P.L.D.), and K25DK128563. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Author contributions: P.L.D. conceived the study and supervised the research; L.Z., A.K. performed computational analyses; M.F., F.Z., G.W., K.K., and P.L.D. provided and analyzed the data; M.T. carried out the immunofluorescence staining analysis; P.L.D. acquired the funding; L.Z., A.K., and P.L.D. wrote the original manuscript draft. L.Z., A.K., M.F., M.T., F.Z., G.W., K.K., P.L.D., and all other authors reviewed and edited the manuscript draft. Competing interests All authors declare no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. References International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C. Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility. Science 365(2019). International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C. & Multiple, M.S.C. Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis. Nature 619, 323–331 (2023). De Jager, P.L. et al. The role of the CD58 locus in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 5264–9 (2009). International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C. et al. Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study. N Engl J Med 357, 851–62 (2007). Ottoboni, L. et al. Clinical relevance and functional consequences of the TNFRSF1A multiple sclerosis locus. Neurology 81, 1891–9 (2013). Ma, Q. et al. Integration of epigenetic and genetic profiles identifies multiple sclerosis disease-critical cell types and genes. Commun Biol 6, 342 (2023). Gregory, S.G. et al. Interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R) shows allelic and functional association with multiple sclerosis. Nat Genet 39, 1083–91 (2007). Maurano, M.T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190–5 (2012). Raj, T. et al. Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. Science 344, 519 – 23 (2014). Maier, L.M. et al. Soluble IL-2RA levels in multiple sclerosis subjects and the effect of soluble IL-2RA on immune responses. J Immunol 182, 1541–7 (2009). Ponath, G., Park, C. & Pitt, D. The Role of Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 9, 217 (2018). Absinta, M. et al. A lymphocyte-microglia-astrocyte axis in chronic active multiple sclerosis. Nature 597, 709–714 (2021). Jakel, S. et al. Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 566, 543–547 (2019). Dutta, R. & Trapp, B.D. Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Prog Neurobiol 93, 1–12 (2011). Schirmer, L. et al. Neuronal vulnerability and multilineage diversity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 573, 75–82 (2019). Wegner, C., Esiri, M.M., Chance, S.A., Palace, J. & Matthews, P.M. Neocortical neuronal, synaptic, and glial loss in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 67, 960–7 (2006). Parnell, G.P. & Booth, D.R. The Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Genetic Risk Factors Indicate both Acquired and Innate Immune Cell Subsets Contribute to MS Pathogenesis and Identify Novel Therapeutic Opportunities. Front Immunol 8, 425 (2017). Patsopoulos, N.A. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies novel multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci. Ann Neurol 70, 897–912 (2011). Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018). e, M.C.E.a.a.b.e. & e, M.C. Harmonizing Clinical Sequencing and Interpretation for the eMERGE III Network. Am J Hum Genet 105, 588–605 (2019). Ramirez, A.H. et al. The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity. Patterns (N Y) 3, 100570 (2022). Khan, A. et al. Polygenic risk affects the penetrance of monogenic kidney disease. medRxiv (2023). Ruan, Y. et al. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations. Nat Genet 54, 573–580 (2022). Willer, C.J., Li, Y. & Abecasis, G.R. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics 26, 2190–1 (2010). Zhernakova, A. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in celiac disease and rheumatoid arthritis identifies fourteen non-HLA shared loci. PLoS Genet 7, e1002004 (2011). Eyre, S. et al. High-density genetic mapping identifies new susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet 44, 1336–40 (2012). Wiley, M.M. et al. Variants in the DDX6-CXCR5 autoimmune disease risk locus influence the regulatory network in immune cells and salivary gland. bioRxiv (2023). Nakatsuka, N. et al. Two genetic variants explain the association of European ancestry with multiple sclerosis risk in African-Americans. Sci Rep 10, 16902 (2020). Magi, R. et al. Trans-ethnic meta-regression of genome-wide association studies accounting for ancestry increases power for discovery and improves fine-mapping resolution. Hum Mol Genet 26, 3639–3650 (2017). Chang, C.C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015). Isobe, N. et al. An ImmunoChip study of multiple sclerosis risk in African Americans. Brain 138, 1518–30 (2015). Beecham, A.H. et al. The genetic diversity of multiple sclerosis risk among Hispanic and African American populations living in the United States. Mult Scler 26, 1329–1339 (2020). Sakaue, S. et al. A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes. Nat Genet 53, 1415–1424 (2021). Jiang, L., Zheng, Z., Fang, H. & Yang, J. A generalized linear mixed model association tool for biobank-scale data. Nat Genet 53, 1616–1621 (2021). Stuart, P.E. et al. Transethnic analysis of psoriasis susceptibility in South Asians and Europeans enhances fine-mapping in the MHC and genomewide. HGG Adv 3(2022). Okada, Y. et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 506, 376 – 81 (2014). Julia, A. et al. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies five new loci for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 20, 100 (2018). Chiou, J. et al. Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics. Nature 594, 398–402 (2021). Dubois, P.C. et al. Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nat Genet 42, 295–302 (2010). de Lange, K.M. et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet 49, 256–261 (2017). Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nat Genet 54, 412–436 (2022). van Rheenen, W. et al. Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat Genet 53, 1636–1648 (2021). Ferrari, R. et al. Frontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol 13, 686 – 99 (2014). Nalls, M.A. et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol 18, 1091–1102 (2019). Mullins, N. et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat Genet 53, 817–829 (2021). Howard, D.M. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci 22, 343–352 (2019). Nagel, M. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nat Genet 50, 920–927 (2018). Trubetskoy, V. et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502–508 (2022). Xue, A. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 143 risk variants and putative regulatory mechanisms for type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun 9, 2941 (2018). Pulit, S.L. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for body fat distribution in 694 649 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet 28, 166–174 (2019). Bulik-Sullivan, B.K. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 47, 291–5 (2015). Lincoln, M.R. et al. Genetic mapping across autoimmune diseases reveals shared associations and mechanisms. Nat Genet 56, 838–845 (2024). Yang, Y. et al. Investigating the shared genetic architecture between multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Nat Commun 12, 5641 (2021). Xia, Z. et al. Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis project: A platform to investigate multiple sclerosis risk. Ann Neurol 79, 178–89 (2016). Rapp, D. et al. Associations between multiple sclerosis and incidence of heart diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Mult Scler Relat Disord 56, 103279 (2021). Gauthier, S.A., Glanz, B.I., Mandel, M. & Weiner, H.L. A model for the comprehensive investigation of a chronic autoimmune disease: the multiple sclerosis CLIMB study. Autoimmun Rev 5, 532–6 (2006). Kerkering, J. et al. iPSC-derived reactive astrocytes from patients with multiple sclerosis protect cocultured neurons in inflammatory conditions. J Clin Invest 133(2023). Perriot, S. et al. Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Astrocytes Are Differentially Activated by Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Cytokines. Stem Cell Reports 11, 1199–1210 (2018). Matute-Blanch, C. et al. Inflammation in multiple sclerosis induces a specific reactive astrocyte state driving non-cell-autonomous neuronal damage. Clin Transl Med 12, e837 (2022). Ponath, G. et al. Myelin phagocytosis by astrocytes after myelin damage promotes lesion pathology. Brain 140, 399–413 (2017). Bryois, J. et al. Cell-type-specific cis-eQTLs in eight human brain cell types identify novel risk genes for psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nat Neurosci 25, 1104–1112 (2022). Fujita, M. et al. Cell subtype-specific effects of genetic variation in the Alzheimer's disease brain. Nat Genet 56, 605–614 (2024). Yazar, S. et al. Single-cell eQTL mapping identifies cell type-specific genetic control of autoimmune disease. Science 376, eabf3041 (2022). Kaskow, B.J. & Baecher-Allan, C. Effector T Cells in Multiple Sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 8(2018). Fletcher, J.M., Lalor, S.J., Sweeney, C.M., Tubridy, N. & Mills, K.H. T cells in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Exp Immunol 162, 1–11 (2010). Ponath, G. et al. Enhanced astrocyte responses are driven by a genetic risk allele associated with multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun 9, 5337 (2018). Bermel, R.A. & Bakshi, R. The measurement and clinical relevance of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 5, 158–70 (2006). Rocca, M.A. et al. Brain MRI atrophy quantification in MS: From methods to clinical application. Neurology 88, 403–413 (2017). Mathys, H. et al. Single-cell atlas reveals correlates of high cognitive function, dementia, and resilience to Alzheimer's disease pathology. Cell 186, 4365–4385 e27 (2023). Xiong, X. et al. Epigenomic dissection of Alzheimer's disease pinpoints causal variants and reveals epigenome erosion. Cell 186, 4422–4437 e21 (2023). Duncan, L. et al. Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations. Nat Commun 10, 3328 (2019). Martin, A.R. et al. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet 51, 584–591 (2019). Magyari, M. & Sorensen, P.S. Comorbidity in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 11, 851 (2020). Hauer, L., Perneczky, J. & Sellner, J. A global view of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review with a focus on regional differences, methodology, and clinical implications. J Neurol 268, 4066–4077 (2021). Criswell, L.A. et al. Analysis of families in the multiple autoimmune disease genetics consortium (MADGC) collection: the PTPN22 620W allele associates with multiple autoimmune phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 76, 561–71 (2005). Devalliere, J. & Charreau, B. The adaptor Lnk (SH2B3): an emerging regulator in vascular cells and a link between immune and inflammatory signaling. Biochem Pharmacol 82, 1391–402 (2011). Liu, L. et al. Genetic regulation of serum IgA levels and susceptibility to common immune, infectious, kidney, and cardio-metabolic traits. Nat Commun 13, 6859 (2022). Gveric, D., Kaltschmidt, C., Cuzner, M.L. & Newcombe, J. Transcription factor NF-kappaB and inhibitor I kappaBalpha are localized in macrophages in active multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57, 168–78 (1998). Yan, J. & Greer, J.M. NF-kappa B, a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 7, 536–57 (2008). Leibowitz, S.M. & Yan, J. NF-kappaB Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis and the Therapeutic Implications. Front Mol Neurosci 9, 84 (2016). Winer, H. et al. IL-7: Comprehensive review. Cytokine 160, 156049 (2022). Liu, Y., Ma, D. & Ji, C. Zinc fingers and homeoboxes family in human diseases. Cancer Gene Ther 22, 223–6 (2015). Zoupi, L. et al. Selective vulnerability of inhibitory networks in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 141, 415–429 (2021). Smolders, J. et al. Tissue-resident memory T cells populate the human brain. Nat Commun 9, 4593 (2018). Baecher-Allan, C., Kaskow, B.J. & Weiner, H.L. Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy. Neuron 97, 742–768 (2018). Salvador, A.F., de Lima, K.A. & Kipnis, J. Neuromodulation by the immune system: a focus on cytokines. Nat Rev Immunol 21, 526–541 (2021). Zipp, F., Bittner, S. & Schafer, D.P. Cytokines as emerging regulators of central nervous system synapses. Immunity 56, 914–925 (2023). Howie, B., Fuchsberger, C., Stephens, M., Marchini, J. & Abecasis, G.R. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat Genet 44, 955–9 (2012). Howie, B.N., Donnelly, P. & Marchini, J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet 5, e1000529 (2009). Khan, A. et al. Genome-wide polygenic score to predict chronic kidney disease across ancestries. Nat Med 28, 1412–1420 (2022). Manichaikul, A. et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–73 (2010). Abraham, G. & Inouye, M. Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data. PLoS One 9, e93766 (2014). Genomes Project, C. et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015). Das, S. et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 48, 1284–1287 (2016). Loh, P.R. et al. Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat Genet 48, 1443–1448 (2016). Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81, 559 – 75 (2007). Khan, A. et al. Medical Records-Based Genetic Studies of the Complement System. J Am Soc Nephrol 32, 2031–2047 (2021). Shang, N. et al. Medical records-based chronic kidney disease phenotype for clinical care and "big data" observational and genetic studies. NPJ Digit Med 4, 70 (2021). McCarthy, S. et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet 48, 1279–83 (2016). Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–8 (2011). Kennedy, A.E., Ozbek, U. & Dorak, M.T. What has GWAS done for HLA and disease associations? Int J Immunogenet 44, 195–211 (2017). Yang, J. et al. Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat Genet 44, 369–75, S1-3 (2012). Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet 47, 1236–41 (2015). Finucane, H.K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat Genet 47, 1228–35 (2015). International HapMap, C. et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467, 52 – 8 (2010). Denny, J.C. et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 26, 1205–10 (2010). Wu, Y. et al. Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesion subtypes with multichannel MRI. Neuroimage 32, 1205–15 (2006). Tina Roostaei, A.S., Pia Kivisäkk, Cristin McCabe, Parham Nejad, Daniel Felsky, Hanane Touil, Ioannis S. Vlachos, Daniel Hui, Jennifer Fransson, Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos, Vijay K. Kuchroo, Violetta Zujovic, Howard L. Weiner, Hans-Ulrich Klein, Philip L. De Jager. Cell type- and state- resolved immune transcriptomic profiling identifies glucocorticoid-responsive molecular defects in multiple sclerosis T cells. (2022). Giambartolomei, C. et al. Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLoS Genet 10, e1004383 (2014). Carpenter, A.E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7, R100 (2006). Duba-Kiss, R., Niibori, Y. & Hampson, D.R. GABAergic Gene Regulatory Elements Used in Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors. Front Neurol 12, 745159 (2021). Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files ZengLSupplementalfilesNGbackup.docx Supplementary Materials AppendixA.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5644532","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":397436209,"identity":"66408132-3bc0-44ac-a5b6-9a6357b3bdd3","order_by":0,"name":"Philip De Jager","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-2505","institution":"Columbia University Irving Medical Center","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Philip","middleName":"","lastName":"De Jager","suffix":""},{"id":397436210,"identity":"e6eb90fd-ee2d-4bb3-bcaa-ae145f813802","order_by":1,"name":"Lu Zeng","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-7690","institution":"Columbia University Irving Medical Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lu","middleName":"","lastName":"Zeng","suffix":""},{"id":397436211,"identity":"64053f19-53cc-41e8-9200-c008a81dbef2","order_by":2,"name":"Atlas Khan","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6651-2725","institution":"Columbia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Atlas","middleName":"","lastName":"Khan","suffix":""},{"id":397436212,"identity":"1fef28b6-761d-44c7-a09b-f421f66cf147","order_by":3,"name":"Tsering Lama","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Columbia University Irving Medical Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tsering","middleName":"","lastName":"Lama","suffix":""},{"id":397436213,"identity":"298cdcd0-eed0-4b8d-932d-a7b0cb8f7644","order_by":4,"name":"Tanuja Chitnis","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Brigham \u0026 Women’s Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tanuja","middleName":"","lastName":"Chitnis","suffix":""},{"id":397436214,"identity":"746fca41-bee7-4e35-85cc-e6c13c9c1fe3","order_by":5,"name":"Howard Weiner","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-9681","institution":"Brigham and Women's Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Howard","middleName":"","lastName":"Weiner","suffix":""},{"id":397436215,"identity":"f5aa8de3-d5c5-4d9a-823e-e8ed6a1f14f6","order_by":6,"name":"Gao Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Columbia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gao","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":397436216,"identity":"998b44b2-d550-4789-877b-2eb891dc7941","order_by":7,"name":"Masashi Fujita","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Columbia University Irving Medical Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Masashi","middleName":"","lastName":"Fujita","suffix":""},{"id":397436217,"identity":"250db02e-c596-44b0-8aa4-09b770fea14a","order_by":8,"name":"Frauke Zipp","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-1928","institution":"University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Frauke","middleName":"","lastName":"Zipp","suffix":""},{"id":397436218,"identity":"64b0c10d-01fd-4c2f-88ec-32255cf5fc4e","order_by":9,"name":"Mariko Taga","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Center for Translational \u0026 Computational Neuroimmunology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mariko","middleName":"","lastName":"Taga","suffix":""},{"id":397436219,"identity":"169caffb-cc54-44ec-9a2a-0cc49e6d8140","order_by":10,"name":"Krzysztof Kiryluk","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-6715","institution":"Columbia University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Krzysztof","middleName":"","lastName":"Kiryluk","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-12-14 16:40:08","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5644532/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5644532/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":73089197,"identity":"e2a58c2a-6f1f-48f8-920c-127adb9a120c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:44","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":230355,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMS GWAS study design.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTop panel: four cohorts used in the meta-analysis. Middle panel: meta-analysis and the three methods used. METAL provides a computationally efficient tool for meta-analysis of genome-wide association scans in European ancestry, MR-MEGA (middle) can identify risk variants with heterogeneous effects due to population stratification introduced by ancestry differences, whereas random-effect (bottom) is better suited for risk variants with homogeneous effect direction across different ancestries. The red dashed lines indicate p-value threshold of P \u0026lt; 5 × 10\u003csup\u003e−8\u003c/sup\u003e. Bottom panel: downstream analyses and their examples.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/16e2f7c7132e2516d031be23.png"},{"id":73090488,"identity":"bfcfa78d-4c43-4102-83d4-51f7558b82ea","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:24:44","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":157614,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCircular presentation of loci associated with multiple sclerosis identified in European ancestry.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe −log10(P) for genetic association with multiple sclerosis are arranged by chromosomal position, indicated by alternating blue and green points. Association P-values are truncated at P \u0026lt; 1 × 10\u003csup\u003e−30\u003c/sup\u003e. Genome-wide significance (P \u0026lt; 5 × 10\u003csup\u003e−8\u003c/sup\u003e) is indicated by the red line. Genes showing coloc effects with DLPFC cell types are highlighted in red, and the genes showed coloc effects in PBMC cell types are highlighted in blue, and the shared coloc genes annotated with black. The inner circle indicates MS-loci that co-localize with DLPFC QTL, colored by cell type. Color keys representing cell types are indicated in the plot center. Chromosomes are indicated by numbered panels 1–22.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/7e505e8ac796542919806747.png"},{"id":73089207,"identity":"0f42228a-930e-480b-bb0f-301c282577eb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:45","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":141145,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverlap of the genetic architecture of multiple sclerosis with other diseases/traits.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A)\u003c/strong\u003e The number of SNPs that reached genome-wide significant (P \u0026lt; 5 × 10\u003csup\u003e−8\u003c/sup\u003e) and were shared across 12 autoimmune diseases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(B, C)\u003c/strong\u003e Percentage of non-major histocompatibility complex SNPs of MS severity, 12 inflammatory/4 neurodegenerative/4 psychiatric/3 BMI-associated diseases/disorders/traits that are not statistically significant (NS), or significant in the same direction (SD) or the opposite direction (OD) in the current 236 MS risk variants using two P-values cut-off (p\u0026lt;0.05 and 0.001). Cell types are ordered alphabetically from left to right.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(D)\u003c/strong\u003e The comparison of 45 MS risk variants with other 24 diseases/traits, the colors represent effect directions and p values. White color denotes SNPs that were not detected in the corresponding phenotypes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(E)\u003c/strong\u003e Genetic correlation estimated across MS and other 24 diseases/traits. The areas of the squares represent the absolute value of corresponding genetic correlations. After FDR correction for 325 tests at a 5% significance level, genetic correlation estimates that are significantly different from 0 are marked with an asterisk (*.01 \u0026lt; pFDR \u0026lt; .05; **.001 \u0026lt; pFDR \u0026lt; .01; ***pFDR \u0026lt; .001). The blue color denotes a positive genetic correlation, and the red color represents a negative genetic correlation.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/4bab8dc12fc377226e4b0fb7.png"},{"id":73089213,"identity":"3dc02cfb-3efd-4747-955a-556754f85f29","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:45","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":139532,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWorkflow for the analaysi of MS GPS.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A)\u003c/strong\u003e The MS GPS was developed using GWAS summary statistics from the IMSGC, All of Us (AoU), and UK Biobank (UKBB). Optimization was performed using 70% of European ancestry participants from eMERGE-III. GPS performance was validated in the remaining 30% of eMERGE-III participants of EUR and all AMR and AFR.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(B, C, D)\u003c/strong\u003ePheWAS results are shown for European (N = 23,121), African-American (N = 15,863), and Latino (N = 5,224) participants. The analysis includes combined data from eMERGE participants with both genotype and phenotype information. Logistic regression was used, adjusting for age, sex, batch, and ancestry. Effect estimates and two-sided P-values were reported. Red horizontal lines indicate the phenome-wide significance threshold, adjusted for multiple testing (P = 2.8 × 10⁻⁵). The Y-axis represents -log10(P-value), and the X-axis displays system-based phecode groupings. Upward-pointing triangles indicate increased odds for a given phecode, while downward-pointing triangles indicate reduced risk.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(E)\u003c/strong\u003e Boxplot diagram depicts the genetic effect of rs438613 with a significant association with white matter volume. The scatter plot displays the pattern of MS GPS in relation to white matter volumes.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/a1c11026d42a6d15d71d69cf.png"},{"id":73089214,"identity":"03eefd82-f142-409c-bf35-1f33826ed560","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:45","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":129062,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverlap of the results from PBMC/DLPFC eQTL and GWAS of MS.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A)\u003c/strong\u003e Heatmap reports the PP.H4 of the Coloc method, which assumes that GWAS and eQTLs share a single causal SNP. The rows report the overlap for individual gene and SNP pairs; the columns report the PP.H4 score in each of our cell types. The color of each square is based on the code found to the right; the darker color denotes higher confidence that the same variant influences susceptibility and gene expression in that cell type. The top bar chart shows the number of colocalized eGenes with high confidence (PP.H4 \u0026gt; 0.8) in each cell type.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(B)\u003c/strong\u003e Cartoon illustration summarizes the colocalization effects of neurons compared to the 18 cell types included in our analysis, colored by cell type.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/51615b4272816c3f9853b231.png"},{"id":73089200,"identity":"a81fb22d-807f-408f-87dc-a9ce9bffdd4b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:45","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":915518,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExamples of COLOC results.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(A, B)\u003c/strong\u003e The locus-compare scatter plot for the association signals at \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eIL7\u003c/em\u003ein the inhibitory neurons.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(C, D, E)\u003c/strong\u003eExpression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) box plots of associations between genotype rs1026916 and \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e expression in inhibitory neurons using snucRNAseq data from Fujita et al. (CUMC study 1), Mathys et al. (MIT cohort), and our in-house multiome datasets (CUMC study 2).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(F)\u003c/strong\u003eImmunohistochemistry of DLPFC in human MS brain tissue, stained for STAT3 (green), GAD1/2 (red), and NeuN (yellow), with DAPI (blue) to visualize nuclei. Expression of STAT3 was observed in NeuN+GAD1/2+ neurons. White triangles highlight the colocalization of DAPI, STAT3, GAD1/2, and NeuN. Scale bar, = 50 μm.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"image6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/ac67fcb0f517beccd28d2786.png"},{"id":73091102,"identity":"1b0b7d59-1812-460c-95c2-adc2fdbc54cf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:32:46","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3084352,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/c9bf9b65-d4f4-48ae-8ecd-f5a794c34fe9.pdf"},{"id":73089202,"identity":"66bd0247-b5a1-4f60-83e7-db085eec1d10","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:45","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":7447963,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary Materials","description":"","filename":"ZengLSupplementalfilesNGbackup.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/a2ff5482a9775c6a7bb14206.docx"},{"id":73089196,"identity":"335971c1-5310-485f-bf1e-6fcc0e255328","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-01-06 15:16:44","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":20097,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AppendixA.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5644532/v1/b0cebbeda83c306c4644e435.docx"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"GWAS highlights the neuronal contribution to multiple sclerosis susceptibility","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe genetic architecture of multiple sclerosis (MS) has come into focus over the past decade. Efforts have been most successful around genetic susceptibility, with over 233 independent risk variants identified to date\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, but a recent study reported one genome-wide significant severity locus\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. While the functional consequences of some susceptibility variants have been characterized \u0026ndash; such as the protective effect rs2300747-G\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e within the \u003cem\u003eCD58\u003c/em\u003e locus and the risk allele rs1800693-G in \u003cem\u003eTNFRSF1A\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e - most of these variants remain poorly understood, and there have been few dedicated efforts to systematically map such effects\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR7 CR8 CR9\" citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Functional consequences of MS variants have been found primarily in peripheral immune cells and in microglia, the resident mesoderm-derived immune cell in the central nervous system\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. While some effects have been noted in non-immune cells, such as astrocytes, in targeted analyses\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR12\" citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, such studies highlight an important challenge in functional genomics as the effect of risk variants can be seen in multiple different cell types and subtypes, creating ambiguity about which cell type is the causal one or whether a combination of cell types is required. Further, the limited availability of quantitative trait locus mapping results in a cell-type specific manner outside of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) populations means that the extent of a variant\u0026rsquo;s effect beyond PBMC is largely unknown.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThus, despite some suggestions\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR15\" citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, there is currently a dearth of evidence that neuroectodermal derivatives that make up the central nervous system are involved in the onset of MS. Rather, the predominance of an initial peripheral auto-inflammatory response is further supported by the fact that approximately half of MS susceptibility variants may be shared with one or more autoimmune disease\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e; it appears that an important component of genetic susceptibility to MS involves dysregulated pathways that lead to a propensity for auto-reactive immune responses. Interestingly, among the shared loci, a large proportion have an opposite effect in other diseases (an MS risk allele is protective for another disease), and MS shares more susceptibility loci with certain auto-inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis (UC), celiac disease (CeD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis (PS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) than others\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. While this portion of shared genetic susceptibility may be more readily understood functionally, the functional consequences of the other MS-specific half of susceptibility variants remains to be determined; it presumably contributes to the targeting of the auto-inflammatory process to the central nervous system instead of the skin, pancreas, joints, or other tissue.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere, we focused on systematically exploring the question of possible MS susceptibility variants exerting functional consequences only in neuronal and glial cell types. To properly power such a systematic evaluation genome-wide, we accessed our prior MS susceptibility results, expanding discovery meta-analysis with three new genome-wide datasets: the UK Biobank (UKBB)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e study, and the initial release of the All of US cohort (AoU)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Our team has previously harmonized these three datasets\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e into a coherent dataset of 750,051 participants. This significantly expanded the GWAS as our prior study had only a targeted replication effort\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Further, these three cohorts have substantial numbers of diverse participants, allowing us to complete a multi-ancestry meta-analysis in MS and to pose some important questions about the relevance of MS susceptibility loci discovered among participants of European ancestry (EUR), African-American (AFR) and Admixed American (AMR). To identify potential causal MS genes, we integrated the extended EUR GWAS results with the gene expression data from EUR participants using a colocalization analysis (COLOC) across the six major cell types of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and 14 major cell types of the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC). We then compared the effect of MS risk loci across 12 inflammatory diseases, four neurodegenerative diseases, four psychiatric disorders, and metabolic traits. Finally, we designed, optimized, and tested a genome-wide polygenic score (GPS)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e for MS that maximizes performance across ancestries. We then conducted a hypothesis-free phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) to identify diseases/traits associated with the GPS, and examined the GPS associations with brain MRI data collected from MS patients (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eNew European ancestry GWAS meta-analysis for MS\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe first harmonized the genetic and phenotypic data available from the UKBB, eMERGE-III, and AoU datasets\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, defining cases by ICD 9: 340, 323 and 341 (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e). We then conducted a European ancestry GWAS meta-analysis (using METAL)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e that includes a total of 5,063 MS cases and 596,340 controls (see Methods) (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e). These results were subsequently combined with our prior meta-analysis\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, increasing sample size to a total of 19,865 MS patients and 623,043 controls. Since the focus of this project was the evaluation of non-immune SNPs, we elected to exclude the extended Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) region from our analysis (Chr6: 25,383,722\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;33,368,421bp in GRCh37).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA total of 5,041 non-MHC SNPs exceeded a threshold of p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;5x10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8\u003c/sup\u003e in the new meta-analysis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e); 99% of these SNPs showed a concordant direction of effect between the prior study\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and the three new cohorts. Using linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based clumping methods, we identified 236 SNPs independently associated with MS susceptibility among the 5,041 significant SNPs. We then removed SNPs with r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1 and within \u0026plusmn;500kb window of any of the 200 previously reported susceptibility variants\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. A total of 38 SNPs were not in LD with the previously reported SNPs. Next, we defined novel MS genomic risk loci using non-overlapping genomic segments that contain at least one MS SNP, with the condition that MS SNPs in adjacent loci are more than 250 kb away from each other (that is, a 250-kb window on each side of one of the SNPs). This approach results in 4 loci that do not appear to have been reported previously as harboring MS susceptibility variants (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, most of the new independently associated variants (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;34) fall within loci that harbor other MS susceptibility variants. We have also removed two susceptibility SNPs reported in our previous study (rs6498163 and rs11256593) due to an LD\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1 with other MS SNPs; in these cases, we kept the SNP within a pair that had the smaller p-value, which brings the total count of current MS susceptibility variants to 198 known and 38 novel variants, or 236 independent MS susceptibility effects, each of which is labeled by a lead SNP (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S2\u003c/b\u003e). We used the results of this new meta-analysis for all subsequent analyses.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGWAS meta-analysis uncovers 38 additional MS susceptibility variants in EUR, one in AFR and two in AMR.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"10\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLocus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCHR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBP (GRCh37)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLead variant\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003es.e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRA/OA\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRAF\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGene\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2701575\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers375915427\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.15\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.079\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.076\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMMEL1, TTC34\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85748811\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers529392609\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.63\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;10\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.063\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.115\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.999\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e85764886\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers11161589\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.12\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;12\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.042\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.403\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCYR61, BCL10\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92956978\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers113561235\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.60\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.101\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.018\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.029\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e92973242\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers79285232\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.85\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;11\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.202\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.028\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e93088923\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers72724541\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.26\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;11\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.136\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.019\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.025\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGFI1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e93291944\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers12042488\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.09\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;11\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.063\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.800\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101289496\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers142860878\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.77\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.198\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.032\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAC93157.1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101307053\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers12047318\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.93\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;10\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.070\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.922\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAC93157.1, EXTL2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101544143\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers147885102\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.69\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;10\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.052\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.008\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.718\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAC93157.1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e157660829\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers77191363\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.86\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.078\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.013\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.946\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFCRL3\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30478386\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers4952115\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.31\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.048\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.008\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.836\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLBH\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e61066666\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers1432295\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.74\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.033\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.432\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eREL\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e101661456\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers74482986\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.46\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.065\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.928\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNXPE3\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e121770539\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers2255214\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.19\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;16\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.049\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.495\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e159702290\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers9858816\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.64\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.034\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.379\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40393852\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers1992662\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.67\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;17\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.054\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.651\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e118815815\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers28762138\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.46\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.244\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.039\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e19\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e158944266\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers7727104\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.17\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.039\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.737\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eC1QTNF2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e135749682\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers13218824\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.01\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.079\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.047\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAHI1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e135904197\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers76892387\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.44\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.085\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.044\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAHI1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e56091706\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers6975311*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.30\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.039\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.727\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4981602\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers10758669*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.20\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.035\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.353\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e64384640\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers77051803\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.30\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.053\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.109\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e321235\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers56232455\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.78\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.042\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.443\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRP11, IFITM3\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60783062\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers75064517\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.85\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.121\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.035\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCD6\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e27\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60827933\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers11230581\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.55\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;15\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.048\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.582\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCD6\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e72450091\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers77267834*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.71\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;12\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.103\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.046\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eARAP1, ATG16L2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e29\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88407917\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers12432149\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.08\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;12\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.041\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.512\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGALC\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11053656\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers117283010\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.07\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;16\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.131\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.015\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.062\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11185464\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers55898143\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.38\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;13\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.081\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.011\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.085\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11242497\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers794423\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.62\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;10\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.104\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.015\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.059\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11247847\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers80207443\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.60\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;13\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.107\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.014\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eT/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.048\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11335999\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers814260\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.30\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.036\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.360\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e35\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11398467\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers10852332\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.02\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.043\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/G\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.213\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40508559\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers58905292\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.96\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.106\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.017\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.049\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e57963873\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers1292052\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.49\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.072\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.012\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.890\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTUBD1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e47253487\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers3935549*\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.62\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;08\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.034\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.006\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.506\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLocus\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCHR\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eBP (GRCh37)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSNP\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eP\u003c/b\u003e \u003cb\u003evalue\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eOR\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003es.e.\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRA/OA\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRAF\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAncestry\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1827489\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers76911648\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.28\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;9\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.169\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/C\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.035\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAFR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18904547\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers59061674\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.00\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.461\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eG/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.038\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAMR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e77706452\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ers113284638\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.82\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.689\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eC/A\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.063\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAMR\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"10\"\u003eTable legend: The gene(s) were assigned on the basis of colocalization results and SNP-to-Gene linking strategies. OR, odds ration; RA/OA, risk/other allele; RAF: risk allele frequency using 1000 Genomes Project (1KG phase 3) EUR/AFR/AMR populations. *The asterisk highlights the susceptibility loci not previously associated with MS.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevious studies reported that multiple MS loci harbored more than one statistically independent effect that met a genome-wide significance threshold\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. This pattern was also observed in our updated list of MS risk variants, where multiple independent associations were found at many loci, such as the \u003cem\u003eDDX6-CXCR5\u003c/em\u003e locus (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e), which has also been implicated in other autoimmune diseases. For example, the variant rs12365699-G\u003csup\u003e,\u003c/sup\u003e located in the \u003cem\u003eDDX6-CXCR5\u003c/em\u003e locus, increased the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and lupus\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR26\" citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMulti-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis for MS\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough the total number of AFR (614 cases and 62,044 controls) and AMR (352 cases and 44,133 controls) ancestry individuals identified by us across the three biobanks was large for an MS study, it remains modest for a GWAS. Our prior study of European ancestry participants required 1,000 MS cases to yield two loci meeting a threshold of genome-wide significance\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Nonetheless, we completed separate GWAS for these two populations aiming to identify ancestry-specific loci. Surprisingly, one new locus is genome-wide significant among AFR participants (rs76911648), its minor allele frequency (MAF) in EUR (MAF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.013) is lower compared to AFR (MAF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.035), and two new SNPs are significant among AMR participants (rs59061674, rs113284638) (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cb\u003efig. S2\u003c/b\u003e), where rs59061674 has a lower MAF in EUR (MAF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.010) than AMR (MAF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.038), while the rs113284638 showed a slightly higher MAF in EUR (MAF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.072) than AMR (MAF\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.063). Given small sample size, these results should be viewed cautiously; in participants of European ancestry, none of these three SNPs have a p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05. Further, they are not in LD with one of the significant SNPs described above. There are no additional non-European ancestry datasets available for replication, so these results will require validation in future more diverse cohorts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo be thorough, we next performed a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of a total of 20,831 MS cases (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;40% increase in the number of MS cases used in the previous GWAS\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e), and 729,220 control participants using two methods: a multi-ancestry meta-regression implemented in MR-MEGA\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and a random effects model implemented in PLINK v1.9\u003csup\u003e30\u003c/sup\u003e. No additional loci became significant in this slightly larger meta-analysis. When we took the list of 236 significant SNPs from the EUR meta-analysis, 184 SNPs were available in AFR, and 18 of these SNPs showed some evidence for replication among AFR participants (nominal P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05, 14 with the same effect directions). In addition, 189 of the 236 SNPs could be tested in AMR participants, and 11 SNPs showed some evidence of association (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05, 9 with the same effect directions) (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S3\u003c/b\u003e). Thus, while dedicated studies of non-European populations are sorely needed, our results suggest that certain findings from European-ancestry meta-GWAS are also relevant to AFR and AMR populations, consistent with earlier studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSusceptibility alleles overlap between MS and other autoimmune diseases\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNext, we assessed the extent to which MS susceptibility was shared with other diseases. We assembled a list of SNPs that reached genome-wide significance (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;5\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8\u003c/sup\u003e) in at least one of 12 autoimmune diseases using their publicly available genome-wide summary statistics (see details in Methods)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR34 CR35 CR36 CR37 CR38 CR39\" citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Adding these SNPs to those meeting a threshold of genome-wide significance in our MS analysis, 32,901 SNPs were retained for a cross-disease analysis (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). A single risk allele (rs3184504-T), a nonsynonymous SNP in the \u003cem\u003eSH2B3\u003c/em\u003e gene, exhibited the highest level of pleiotropy with concordant risk associations shared across seven autoimmune diseases (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S4\u003c/b\u003e), including multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, lupus, type 1 diabetes, celiac diseases, inflammatory bowel disease and thyroiditis. In addition, we identified 7,849 SNPs with associations shared between at least two autoimmune diseases, and we see decreasing numbers of SNPs that have some evidence of association in 3 more diseases, including 5 SNPs that may have a role in 6 diseases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo extend this analysis and better understand the pleiotropy of our MS variants, we next evaluated the behavior of our updated list of 236 MS susceptibility SNPs (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S2\u003c/b\u003e) in the results of other GWAS, including MS severity\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, 12 autoimmune diseases\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR34 CR35 CR36 CR37 CR38 CR39\" citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, four neurodegenerative diseases\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR42 CR43\" citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, four psychiatric disorders/traits\u003csup\u003e45\u0026ndash;48\u003c/sup\u003e, and three metabolic traits\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S5\u003c/b\u003e). The analysis was run twice, using either a nominal significance level (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) or a slightly more conservative threshold of p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001. We partitioned the results into three groups: (1) SNPs showing the same direction of effect as MS in the other disease/trait, (2) SNPs showing the opposite direction with these phenotypes, and (3) SNPs that did not meet the threshold of significance (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB \u003cb\u003e\u0026amp; C\u003c/b\u003e). T1D and IBD had the most potential associations for our MS SNPs, with 87 and 73 of SNPs meeting a nominal threshold of significance (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB). In both cases, there was a clear skew for the sharing to occur in the same direction of effect, but a quarter of the MS variants had a flipped direction of effect in the other diseases. This pattern held true for the other autoimmune diseases and for the higher threshold of significance (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC), consistent with patterns seen in earlier studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The extent of sharing is dependent, in part, on the size of the GWAS for the non-MS trait, as some diseases still have relatively small GWAS or are underpowered, such as the MS severity GWAS, which returned only one significant locus\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterestingly, we see a fair amount of sharing with the neuropsychiatric traits, more than with the neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimer\u0026rsquo;s disease is intriguing, given an apparent excess of inverse effects in the shared SNPs with MS (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The metabolic traits also harbor a notable amount of sharing. However, the direction of these variants seems relatively random, with ~\u0026thinsp;50% of the variants having an inverse effect relative to the MS risk. Under the more stringent statistical significance cutoffs (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), few of the MS SNPs were associated with the other traits, but the pattern among the autoimmune diseases was the same (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eC).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD presents the same results in a more granular form, where we filtered the MS risk variants that showed genome-wide significance in at least one of the 24 phenotypes utilized here: for example, the rs3184504-T allele in the \u003cem\u003eSH2B3\u003c/em\u003e locus consistently shows increased risk in MS, lupus, celiac disease, thyroiditis, psoriasis, RA, and IBD (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S4\u003c/b\u003e). We gain an appreciation of the complexity of the mechanisms of MS susceptibility: while a good portion of the variants clearly affect some aspect that yields a propensity to develop an autoimmune response, the substantial number of inverse effects highlight that the role of certain immune pathways is disease-specific. One example of this complexity is the \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e locus, in which rs1026916 reaches p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;28\u003c/sup\u003e in MS (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eD) and has substantial evidence of being involved in psoriasis in the same direction, but this variant has attained genome-wide significance in IBD, UC, and CD in the opposite direction of effect relative to MS. Despite many shared autoimmune SNPs with MS, 50/236 were specific to MS at the most comprehensive threshold (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) across the 12 autoimmune diseases, and 27 were specific to MS among all the phenotypes we tested.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e With the genome-wide summary statistics collected above, we then obtained the genetic correlations estimate from MS for the 325 pairwise combinations among the 25 phenotypes and compared the results to the LD score regression (LDSC) estimates (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eE, \u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S6\u003c/b\u003e) using an imputed reference panel including 1,217,312 quality-controlled HapMap3 SNPs\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. This analysis suggests that MS is most similar to UC (rg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.250, p-value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.47\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;09\u003c/sup\u003e), SLE (rg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.221, p-value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.00\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;04\u003c/sup\u003e, IBD (rg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.194, p-value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.60\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;06\u003c/sup\u003e) and RA (rg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.150, p-value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.50\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;03\u003c/sup\u003e), which is consistent with earlier studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e53\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Interestingly, we also found significant positive correlations between MS and neuroticism (rg\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.090, p-value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2.00\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;04\u003c/sup\u003e). MS severity did not show any significant correlations with the traits we tested. This MS severity study is probably underpowered, and we will need larger studies to truly explore the possibility of shared genetic architecture between MS severity and other inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. Notably, IgA nephropathy, COPD, thyroiditis, IBD, and CD had a significant genetic correlation with the psychiatric disorders/traits we tested (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eE).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePolygenic score for multiple sclerosis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePolygenic risk scores have emerged as tools with which to capture an individual\u0026rsquo;s inherited disease susceptibility. They may be useful for stratifying individuals in clinical trials, and for guiding primary prevention and management of individuals at high genetic risk for MS\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e54\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. A genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) may also be used for discovery of the shared genetic architecture between MS and other unsuspected traits beyond inflammatory diseases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe rigorously approached the construction of such a score using our non-MHC SNPs. We developed our initial model in the combined IMSGC, UKBB, and AoU datasets. We reserved the eMERGE-III dataset to test the model. The flowchart summary of our analytical approach is provided in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA (see details in Methods). The GPS for MS was tested with adjustment for age, sex, genotyping batch, and genetic ancestry. As shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, the GPS was strongly associated with the risk of MS in the independent testing cohort of European ancestry, with an overall odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation of the GPS of 1.70 (95%CI:1.52\u0026ndash;1.91, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.37\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;19\u003c/sup\u003e). The participants in the top 1% vs. the remaining 99% of MS-GPS had more than a 7-fold increased MS risk (95% CI: 4.37-12.00, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.60\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;14\u003c/sup\u003e). We additionally validated the risk score in two smaller testing cohorts of AMR and AFR ancestry. Although the magnitude of effect was decreased, the GPS was significantly associated with MS in both cohorts. The OR per standard deviation of the GPS was estimated at 1.46 (95%CI 1.10\u0026ndash;1.94, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8.57\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e⁻03\u003c/sup\u003e) for AMR ancestry and 1.26 (95%CI 1.07\u0026ndash;1.49, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;5.64\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e⁻03\u003c/sup\u003e) for AFR ancestry (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, while dedicated efforts in these populations are sorely needed to further improve the GPS performance, the current GPS is already validating across major ancestral populations found in North America.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePerformance metrics for the genome-wide polygenic score (GPS) in MS.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eeMEGRE-III (Ancestries)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCase/control\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOR per SD (95% CI),\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eP-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAUC (Crude)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePRS Threshold\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOdds ratio (95% CI), P value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEUR (30%) Genetic Ancestry\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e287/22,796\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.70 (1.52\u0026ndash;1.91),\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.37\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;19\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.7217 (0.6398)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 20% vs. other 80%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.62 (2.06\u0026ndash;3.34), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.71\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;15\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 10% vs. other 90%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.00 (2.28\u0026ndash;3.95), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.11\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;15\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 5% vs. other 95%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.14 (3.03\u0026ndash;5.65), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.45\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;19\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 2% vs. other 98%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.05 (3.3\u0026ndash;7.75), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;9.45\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;14\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTop 1% vs. other 99%\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e7.24 (4.37-12)\u003c/b\u003e, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u003cb\u003e=\u0026thinsp;1.60\u0026times;10\u003c/b\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;14\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAFR Genetic Ancestry\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e142/15,600\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.26 (1.07\u0026ndash;1.49),\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.00564\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.7458 (0.5543)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 20% vs. other 80%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.45 (0.99\u0026ndash;2.13), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.057\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 10% vs. other 90%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.53 (0.95\u0026ndash;2.46), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.079\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 5% vs. other 95%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.70 (0.93\u0026ndash;3.11), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.087\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 2% vs. other 98%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.73 (0.69\u0026ndash;4.32), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.241\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTop 1% vs. other 99%\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2.70 (0.96\u0026ndash;7.61)\u003c/b\u003e, \u003cb\u003eP\u003c/b\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u003cb\u003e=\u0026thinsp;0.060\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAMR Genetic Ancestry\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e55/5,148\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.46 (1.10\u0026ndash;1.94),\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.00857\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.7524 (0.5526)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 20% vs. other 80%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.41 (0.73\u0026ndash;2.73), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.308\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 10% vs. other 90%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.52 (0.63\u0026ndash;3.66), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.346\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 5% vs. other 95%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.14 (0.74\u0026ndash;6.14), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.159\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTop 2% vs. other 98%\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.99 (2.02\u0026ndash;17.8), \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.001\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTop 1% vs. other 99%\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9.87 (2.75\u0026ndash;35.5)\u003c/b\u003e, \u003cb\u003eP\u003c/b\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u003cb\u003e=\u0026thinsp;4.44\u0026times;10\u003c/b\u003e\u003csup\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;4\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe then assessed phenome-wide associations of this GPS in a PheWAS based on eMERGE participants who were not included in the GPS design. This approach offers a complementary strategy to assess for unsuspected shared genetic architecture with a range of clinical traits across the entire phenome. In the well-powered analysis of participants with European ancestry, the GPS association with MS was strongly replicated (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.97, 95%CI:1.71\u0026ndash;2.27, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.35\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;21\u003c/sup\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB). We also found a GPS association with \u0026ldquo;other inflammatory demyelinating diseases\u0026rdquo; (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.67, 95%CI:1.36\u0026ndash;2.04, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.33\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;07\u003c/sup\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB). This poorly defined diagnostic group may harbor certain individuals with MS and contains conditions that share symptomatology with MS but have different immune mechanisms. Thus, there may be some overlap in genetic architecture with these less common entities. The association with \u0026ldquo;functional disorders of the bladder\u0026rdquo; (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.22, 95%CI:1.12\u0026ndash;1.34, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.59\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;06\u003c/sup\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB) was likely related to the fact that bladder dysfunction represents a common symptom of MS. No other diagnostic category was significantly associated with the MS GPS, suggesting that our GPS is fairly specific to MS.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the smaller AFR dataset, the association of the GPS with MS was also phenome-wide significant (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.62, 95%CI:1.31\u0026ndash;2.01, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.55\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;06\u003c/sup\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eC), consistent with the earlier dedicated analysis. In the AMR cohorts with fewer cases, the association with MS was only nominally significant (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.51, 95%CI:1.01\u0026ndash;2.26, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.04, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD) likely due to low power. The GPS was also associated with \u0026ldquo;Congestive heart failure (CHF) NOS\u0026rdquo; (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.28, 95%CI:1.15\u0026ndash;1.43, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.08\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;05\u003c/sup\u003e, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD). MS has been reported to be linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e55\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, but given small sample size of the AMR cohort, and the absence of this association in AFR and EUR cohorts, this association may be spurious. We conclude that the GPS is associated with MS across different ancestral populations, but its predictive performance remains lower in non-European populations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, we have tested our GPS in MS patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and genotype information using the data selected from the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of Multiple Sclerosis at the Brigham and Women\u0026rsquo;s Hospital (CLIMB) study\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (see details in Methods). A linear regression model was used to examine the associations between the GPS and brain tissue compartments adjusted for age at visit, sex, and top three ancestry PCs. We observed a nominally significant association between the GPS and lower white matter volume in the MS patients (p-value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.03) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eE\u003cb\u003e).\u003c/b\u003e However, no significant associations were found between MS-GPS and other MRI measurements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eFunctional characterization of MS variants using cell-type specific brain and blood eQTL\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior systematic evaluations of functional consequences of MS susceptibility variants\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e had revealed that MS SNPs affected gene expression in peripheral immune cells and microglia (a myeloid cell type that integrates the neurectoderm early in development). While some targeted investigations looked at astrocytes in relation to molecular pathways present in many cell types, there has been few systematic evaluation of MS genetic effects specific to CNS cell types in relation to MS susceptibility or severity\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR58 CR59 CR60\" citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e57\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e61\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Thus, we accessed our recent atlas of CNS cell type-specific eQTL effects generated from well-powered set of frozen postmortem human brain samples collected from the same brain region, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Further, we accessed a publicly available resource derived from PBMC samples\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e to map the effects of MS variants on peripheral immune cells as a contrast and to assess cell-type specificity of the functional consequences. Using these two references, we identified those MS susceptibility variants that are found in the vicinity of an eQTL in each of the tested blood and brain cell types and then assessed whether the two effects co-localize using Coloc (v5.1.0) (see \u003cb\u003eMethods\u003c/b\u003e). The results are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA \u003cb\u003e(Supplementary table S7)\u003c/b\u003e where, as expected, there are several colocalized effects (PP.H4\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.8) among blood-derived cells; this is consistent with prior reports that na\u0026iuml;ve T cells harbor the most of these MS-related functional consequences\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e64\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e65\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Most of these effects are shared among several cell types, but some \u0026ndash; such as \u003cem\u003eNR1D1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eMMEL1\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ndash; appear specific to na\u0026iuml;ve T cells (amongst the cells surveyed here). Further, we now demonstrate colocalization with microglial eQTL, which had been suspected from prior analyses that uncovered enrichment of microglial genes amongst genetically implicated MS susceptibility genes\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, the most interesting new set of results involves the cell types that derive from the neurectoderm: the glial and neuronal cells. In our reference, the most numerous cell types are excitatory neurons; they also have the largest transcriptome and, hence, have the most eQTL effects compared to other CNS cell types that are less frequent in the cortex\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Despite this, inhibitory neurons harbor the most eQTLs that colocalize with MS susceptibility variants of any CNS cell type (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;15) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eA \u003cb\u003e\u0026amp; B \u0026amp; S3\u003c/b\u003e); this is more than the resident immune cells, the microglia (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6). Further, seven of these functional consequences to MS variants are unique to inhibitory neurons. We also see five other variants that have functional consequences only in excitatory neurons. Thus, neuronal cells seem to play an important role in the earliest events leading to the onset of MS. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eA\u003cb\u003e\u0026amp;B\u003c/b\u003e zooms into two MS loci, \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eIL7\u003c/em\u003e, illustrating the co-localization of susceptibility and expression effects. These are well-studied cytokine-related genes involved in amplification of immune responses, with evidence that IL7-driven signaling occurs, in part, through \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e. Our comparative assessment of blood and brain cells indicates that these two functional consequences of MS variants may be mechanistically related and unique to inhibitory neurons. They may provide a bridge between the peripheral leukocyte-driven propensity for autoimmunity and the targeting of the CNS by peripheral immune dysfunction, as neuronal cells respond differently to inflammatory stimuli. Further work is needed to understand how these two functional consequences intersect with the other neuronal-specific effects (in excitatory as well as inhibitory neurons).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile neurons harbor the most functional consequences of MS variants, each of the glial cell types harbor some such effects, including some that are specific to astrocytes (\u003cem\u003eKCTD13\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eRRAS2\u003c/em\u003e) and oligodendrocytes (\u003cem\u003ePHGDH\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSYNGR1\u003c/em\u003e), for example. A previous report implicated an MS variant near the \u003cem\u003eNFKB1\u003c/em\u003e gene in altered immune responses in astrocytes; however, this SNP is not found to alter gene expression in our brain datasets\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e66\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. We note that the pathognomonic feature of multiple sclerosis at its onset is the presence of inflammatory demyelination, which targets the myelin sheath produced by oligodendrocytes. Thus, while some of the MS loci may finally connect the peripheral immune dysfunction to a well-validated target cell type, many more loci implicate neuronal cells, and this may provide insights into the neurodegenerative component of the disease, which is apparent as brain atrophy early on\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e67\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e68\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e but presents clinically only much later.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eReplication of colocalized eQTL \u0026amp; epigenomic assessment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe accessed additional single-nucleus datasets, and, as shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eC-E, and the \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e RNA expression effect in inhibitory neurons is robust, being reproducibly found in two other datasets\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The rs1026916\u003csup\u003eA\u003c/sup\u003e risk allele is associated with decreased gene expression using our original dataset (CUMC study 1)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, data from colleagues at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e69\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and a new snucRNAseq dataset (CUMC study 2). In addition, we identified eQTL-eGene effects in multiple corresponding cell types (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary table S8\u003c/b\u003e). For example, rs4896153 is an eQTL associated with \u003cem\u003eAHI1\u003c/em\u003e in microglia, and rs6032662 is associated with \u003cem\u003eSLC12A5\u003c/em\u003e in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReviewing reference epigenomic profiles\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e70\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, we found that most of our top prioritized variants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e \u003cb\u003eand Supplementary Table S7\u003c/b\u003e) are not located in segments of open chromatin in the cell types implicated by the eQTL analyses. However, one SNP, rs3923387, tags a genetic effect near the \u003cem\u003ePLEC\u003c/em\u003e gene that influences (1) MS susceptibility, (2) the accessibility of chromatin in a nearby chromosomal segment (GRCh37 chr8:145034681\u0026ndash;145035181) in microglia (colocalization of MS susceptibility PP.H4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.84), and (3) the expression of the \u003cem\u003ePLEC\u003c/em\u003e gene in the same cell type (as shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, colocalization of the ATAC QTL and eQTL PP.H4\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.93 (\u003cb\u003eSupplementary fig. S4\u003c/b\u003e). This result illustrates the next phase of our consortium\u0026rsquo;s work, generation of improved, cell-resolved, multi-omic data to map the propagation of effects from the MS susceptibility variants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, to extend the narrative, we also confirmed the expression of STAT3 protein in inhibitory neurons using immunofluorescence in DLPFC tissue sections of a post-mortem MS individual obtained from the New York Brain Bank (NYBB). We observed that STAT3 is expressed in GAD1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003eGAD2\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e inhibitory neuron cells, with 2.8% of these neurons showing elevated STAT3 expression (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;2SD) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eF and S5). However, no significant differences in neuronal morphology, including compactness and shape, were observed between STAT3-expressing inhibitory neurons and those lacking STAT3 expression.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn an updated MS GWAS analysis of 19,865 MS cases with genome-wide genotype data, we identified 38 novel MS risk variants and four novel genomic loci involved in MS susceptibility. Combined with SNPs generated from previous studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, our consortium has reported a total of 236 independent non-MHC MS risk variants identified in participants of European ancestry. We have also conducted a multi-ancestry MS GWAS, including AFR and AMR ancestry participants. Although the sample size of the diverse participants is small, we uncovered one locus that reached genome-wide significance among AFR participants and two loci among AMR participants. These results should be considered cautiously until further evidence of replication emerges, given the small size of their discovery analyses. Our rigorously derived GPS provides a new tool for the community to investigate the role of genetic predisposition to MS in other datasets and contexts. Interestingly, while it requires additional optimizations for use in non-European populations, our results suggest that the current version already has some predictive capacity among individuals of AFR and AMR ancestry, consistent with earlier reports\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e71\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e72\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. There is a pressing need for larger studies in non-European ancestry groups to ensure that any future clinical utility is broadly applicable. Given the strong but complex role of the MHC in MS, inclusion of susceptibility variants from that region will further improve the prediction in European populations but may be less informative in diverse population given the rapid and copmplex evoluation of the MHC which harbors many population-specific effects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUsing our updated MS results, we sought to classify our susceptibility variants functionally. In one approach, we accessed the results of other GWAS to identify those variants that may affect susceptibility by altering more general mechanisms that lead to a propensity for autoimmunity. This hypothesis is consistent with epidemiological studies reporting a higher prevalence of other autoimmune diseases in persons with MS, such as T1D, thyroid disease, and inflammatory bowel disease\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e73\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e74\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e as well as the existence of families with members affected by different autoimmune diseases\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e75\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. However, the story is not that simple, as there does not appear to be a clear \u0026ldquo;global genetic risk for autoimmunity\u0026rdquo;: The rs3184504 variant in the \u003cem\u003eSH2B3\u003c/em\u003e locus offers a good illustration, as its risk allele \u0026ldquo;T\u0026rdquo; was found associated with increased risk of celiac disease, IBD, MS, psoriasis, lupus, T1D and thyroiditis. The \u003cem\u003eSH2B3\u003c/em\u003e gene encodes the Src homology 2 adaptor protein 3, which regulates inflammation, immunity, and blood cell production. Certain genetic variants of \u003cem\u003eSH2B3\u003c/em\u003e can cause it to fail to control an overactive immune response, which can lead to autoimmunity\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e76\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. It was also reported to be associated with immunoglobulin levels and multiple other non-immune traits; it displayed a high degree of pleiotropy, being associated with 79 different GWAS traits\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e77\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Overall, our results support shared autoimmune mechanisms\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e52\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, where we show that a substantial proportion of shared loci harbor pleiotropic effects influencing risk to MS and other autoimmune diseases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe thus found that 186 of the 236 variants have some evidence of association with another autoimmune disease using the most inclusive threshold. This suggests that the remaining 50 variants may have a role in other processes that relate to targeting the propensity for an autoimmune process towards the target organ, in our case, the brain and spinal cord. Prior work had clearly demonstrated that the peripheral immune system harbors the functional consequences of many variants. While CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells were strongly implicated, all other bone marrow-derived cells and microglia were also found to harbor at least some of the effects of susceptibility variants\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e in these analyses. The role of CNS cells was unclear, with a potential but ambiguous association with \u003cem\u003eSLC12A5\u003c/em\u003e expression in brain transcriptomic data and functional consequences of the six MS variants in astrocytes that perturbed the NF-κB pathway. This pathway is also implicated in many immune cells, and current MS treatments are found to be directly or indirectly linked to NF-κB pathways, modulating both the innate and adaptive immune system in patients\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR79\" citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e78\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e80\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere, our co-localization analysis showed that CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e Na\u0026iuml;ve T cells harbor the largest number of cases where the same variant influences MS susceptibility and RNA expression, consistent with previous studies. Surprisingly, we found that inhibitory neurons showed the most colocalization signals among CNS cell types, followed by excitatory neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, and most of the colocalized signals in neurons are unique to this cell type (when compared to cortical and bone-marrow-derived cells). For example, \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eIL7\u003c/em\u003e illustrate loci with evidence of co-localization of susceptibility and expression effects only in inhibitory neurons. These are well-studied cytokine-related genes that are involved in the amplification of immune responses, with evidence that \u003cem\u003eIL7\u003c/em\u003e-driven signaling occurs, in part, through \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e81\u003c/sup\u003e. Thus, these two loci implicate a specific molecular pathway in the onset of MS through perturbation of neuronal function. Another example is \u003cem\u003eZHX3\u003c/em\u003e in excitatory neurons, \u003cem\u003eZHX\u003c/em\u003e3 is a member of a family of transcriptional repressors that are involved in neural progenitor maintenance, hematopoietic cell development, and differentiation. Dysfunction of \u003cem\u003eZHX\u003c/em\u003e family members is linked to the development and progression of neurological disease\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e82\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Our comparative assessment of blood and brain cells, therefore, prioritizes a subset of MS variants that implicate CNS parenchymal cells in disease onset. Clearly, perturbed pathways that lead to a propensity to autoimmune reactions are interacting with perturbed immune responses in neurons and glial cells to initiate autoreactive cells that lead to both recurrent bouts of inflammatory demyelination and a slowly progressive neurodegenerative process that remains poorly understood. The predilection of inhibitory neurons as a target for these risk variants is intriguing, particularly given the recent report that inhibitory neurons appear to be lost preferentially in the MS brain\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e83\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. With our observations, we can now generate hypotheses to explore the downstream molecular and functional changes elicited by the variants in the cell type in which they are implicated. The role of the adaptive immune system is well established in MS, while CD8\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells are most abundant in the white matter of MS brain\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e84\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The CD4\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e T cells probably play a role that is as important given the convergence of genetic susceptibility effects in this cell type and earlier studies\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e85\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Our data here suggest direct interactions between T cells and neurons or glia may be important to trigger the onset of MS through both classes of lymphocytes, elaborating a rich literature of immune responses expressed by neuroglial cells\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e86\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e87\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. More broadly, it is likely that tissue-specific cells are likely to play a similar role in other inflammatory diseases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn summary, these results advance our understanding of the biological etiology of MS, refocusing our efforts on understanding the onset of the disease to include specific molecular pathways in the brain. While most loci have functional consequences in a variety of immune cell types, our study prioritizes understanding the unsuspected neuronal contribution to the onset of MS. They alter our conceptualization and approach to primary prevention and treatment of MS, which may have to include interventions targeting the central nervous system pathways.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods and Materials","content":"\u003ch3\u003eStudy design\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis cross-sectional study involves a combined analysis of the UKBB, eMERGE-III, and AoU cohorts. All participants provided informed consent to participate in genetic studies. Each cohort was first analyzed separately, and cohort-specific results were combined using fixed-effects meta-analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eUK Biobank (UKBB)\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe UKBB is a longitudinal cohort of individuals ages 40\u0026ndash;69 years at enrollment, recruited between 2006 and 2010 across the United Kingdom\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The individuals recruited to UKBB signed an electronic consent to allow the broad sharing of their anonymized data for health-related research. UKBB generated and released SNP microarray, exome sequence, and structured EHR data for 488,377 participants. The cohort is 54% female, with a mean age of 57 years, and the composition is 94% Europeans, 2% West or Southeast Asians, and 2% African ancestry by self-report\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eSNP microarray data\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe details of the UKBB microarray genotyping, imputation, and quality control are available elsewhere\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Briefly, using the UKBB Axiom Array (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;438,427) and UK BiLEVE Axiom Array (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;49,950), a total of 488,377 participants have been genotyped for 805,426 overlapping markers. The 1000 Genomes, UK10K, and Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) reference panels were used to perform genome-wide imputation using IMPUTE2 software\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e88\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e89\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. We performed post-imputation quality control analyses as described in our previous work based on this dataset\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e90\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e retaining 9,233,643 common (i.e., Minor Allele Frequency (MAF)\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01), high-quality (imputation R2\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.80) variants for the purpose of GPS calculation. To eliminate any potential confounding by close familial relationships, we excluded cryptically related individuals (kinship coefficient\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.0442)\u003csup\u003e91\u003c/sup\u003e from downstream analyses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eGenetic ancestry analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe used the UKBB genotype array data for principal component analysis (PCA). We first pruned the genotype data using the plink command \u0026lsquo;--indep-pairwise 500 50 0.05\u0026rsquo;. We then used FlashPCA\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e92\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e based on 35,091 pruned variants. We merged the UKBB samples with 2504 participants of the 1000 Genomes Project (1KG phase 3)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e93\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and kept only shared variants between the two datasets. Then, we used a random forest machine learning based on 10 principal components to train ancestry classifiers using 1KG labeled data. Finally, we used the trained model to predict the genetic ancestry of the UKBB samples (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary fig. S6a\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eAll of Us (AoU)\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe AoU research program launched recruitment in 2018 across 340 sites across the United States, and over 372,380 participants were enrolled by 2022. AoU combines participant-derived data from surveys such as self-reported health information, physical measurements, electronic health records, and biospecimens. We analyzed the AoU data on Workbench, a cloud-based environment\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The second release data included N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;312,944 participants with complete SNP microarray, genome sequencing data, and phenotype information. The participants included 60% female, the mean age was 55 years, and consisted of 53% European, 4% Asian, and 21% Black/African American race by self-report. In addition, 17% of the cohort self-reported Hispanic/Latinx ancestry (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eSNP microarray genotype data\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAll participants were genotyped with the Illumina Global Diversity Array (GDA). This microarray contains 1,904,679 SNVs and 44,172 indels. First, we performed genome-wide imputation analysis on the Workbench platform. Before imputation, we excluded all variants with MAF less than or equal to 0.005 (671,685 variants) or genotype missingness rate greater than or equal to 0.05 (41,526 variants). The genomic positions were lifted over from human GRCh38 to hg19 for 96% of SNPs. We then adopted the TopMed pre-imputation quality control (QC) pipeline to correct allele designations and remove poorly mapping variants\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e94\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. After QC, we used 1,191,468 variants for imputation. To reduce RAM usage and increase speed, we split the 312,944 subjects with microarray data into 8 equal batches and then imputed each batch separately. After pre-phasing with EAGLE v.2\u003csup\u003e95\u003c/sup\u003e, we imputed missing genotypes using the Minimac4\u003csup\u003e88\u003c/sup\u003e and 1KG phase 3v5\u003csup\u003e93\u003c/sup\u003e reference panel. A total of 43,371,225 autosomal variants were imputed in 312,944 individuals. We then merged the eight batches based on position using VCFtools software with the command \u0026lsquo;vcftools --gzvcf --positions --recode --recode-INFO-all \u0026ndash;stdout\u0026rsquo;. MAFs for the imputed markers were closely correlated (correlation coefficient (r)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.96) with the MAFs for the 1KG dataset.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eGenetic ancestry analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSimilar to the UKBB data, we first pruned the genetic data using the command \u0026lsquo;--indep-pairwise 500 50 0.05\u0026rsquo; in PLINK\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e96\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and used N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;36,358 pruned variants for kinship and ancestry analysis. Using KING software\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e91\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, we removed 270 samples with pairwise kinship coefficients\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.35. We then merged our AoU samples with 1KG samples, kept only SNPs in common between the two datasets, calculated PCs for the 1KG samples, and projected each of our samples onto those PCs. We then used a random forest-based machine learning approach to assign a continental ancestry group to each AoU sample. Briefly, we trained and tested the random forest algorithm on 1KG subjects with known labels. We trained the random forest model using 10 PCs as a labeled feature matrix. Then, we used our trained random forest model to predict the genetic ancestries for the AoU dataset (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e and \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary fig. S6b\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eeMERGE-III\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe eMERGE network provides access to electronic health record information linked to GWAS data for 102,138 individuals recruited in 3 phases (eMERGE-I, II, and III) across 12 participating medical centers from 2007 to 2019 (54% female, mean age 69 years, 76% European, 15% African-American, 6% Latinx and 1% East or southeast Asian by self-report)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e97\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e98\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. All individuals were genotyped genome-wide; details on genotyping and quality control analyses have been described previously\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e97\u003c/span\u003e,\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e98\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. All GWAS datasets were briefly imputed using the multiethnic Haplotype Reference Consortium panel on the Michigan Imputation Server\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e99\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. The imputation was performed in 81 batches. We included only markers with a MAF\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;0.01 and R2\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;0.8 in \u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;75% of batches post-imputation. A total of 7,529,684 variants were retained for the GPS analysis. For PCA, we used FlashPCA\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e92\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e on a set of 48,509 common (MAF\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;0.01) and independent variants (pruned in PLINK with the --indep-pairwise 500 50 0.05 command). The analyses were performed using a combination of VCFtools v.0.1.13\u003csup\u003e100\u003c/sup\u003e and PLINK v.1.9\u003csup\u003e96\u003c/sup\u003e. Similar to UKBB and AoU, we defined the genetic ancestry for eMERGE based on random forest (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary fig. S6c)\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eMS phenotyping and case-control definitions\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe MS phenotype was defined using ICD codes from the UKBB, eMERGE-III, and AoU datasets. Cases were identified by at least one occurrence of the following ICD codes: ICD-9: 340, 323, or 341. Participants without any of these codes were classified as controls.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eMeta-GWAS\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe MHC is the most gene-dense and most polymorphic part of the human genome. The region exhibits haplotype-specific linkage disequilibrium patterns, extreme structural variation and copy number variations, and an extremely high level of genetic diversity; the use of a single reference sequence to analyze GWAS data in this area is problematic\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e101\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Therefore, the Extended MHC region (xMHC) is set aside in our meta-analysis (defined as the regions between \u003cem\u003eHIST1H2AA\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eRPL12P1\u003c/em\u003e genes: chr6: 25,383,722\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;33,368,421Mb; ~7.6Mb, GRCh37), resulting in ~\u0026thinsp;68,000 SNPs located in xMHC were removed for further analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe first performed a meta-analysis using an inverse-variance-weighted fixed-effects model in METAL (version 2011-03-25)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e combining UKBB, AoU, and eMERGE-III cohorts for European ancestry (5,063 MS cases and 596,340 controls), African-American (614 MS cases and 62,044 controls) and Hispanic American (352 MS cases and 44,133 controls) populations, respectively. In addition, another meta-analysis using METAL was performed exclusively for the European ancestry cohort, which included the GWAS summary statistics from the IMSGC discovery cohort\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, along with UKBB, AoU, and eMERGE-III (19,865 MS cases and 623,043 controls). A genome-wide significant locus was defined as the region around a SNP with P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;5 \u0026times; 10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;8\u003c/sup\u003e, LD r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1, within a 500-kb window, using the reference panel from phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project as the reference population.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTwo models were used to conduct multi-ancestry meta-analyses (20,831 MS cases and 729,220 controls). Random effects models were performed using PLINK v1.9\u003csup\u003e96\u003c/sup\u003e, while a separate analysis was performed using MR-MEGA v0.2\u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e. PLINK v1.9 was preferred over METAL due to its capacity to perform random effects analyses in parallel. A random effects model provides a more conservative framework that allows each study to have unique effects, as expected in different populations. MR-MEGA was also employed since it is well-powered to detect associations at loci with allelic heterogeneity. MR-MEGA models allelic effects as a function of axes of genetic variation that are derived from the input GWAS summary statistics. This method can result in reduced variant sets since it requires that variants have sufficient overlap between the input datasets (K\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;3), where K is the number of inputs GWAS, in contrast to random effects models implemented in PLINK v1.9, which were limited to K\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;2 to quantify heterogeneity accurately.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo identify novel genomic risk loci, LD blocks of independent significant SNPs (R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.1, \u0026plusmn;500kb, 1KG phase 3) were merged into a single genomic locus if the distance between LD blocks was less than 250 kb. These loci were compared to the previous GWAS\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e to assess whether these regions were known to be associated with MS. There was no evidence of stratification artifacts or uncontrolled inflation of test statistics in the results from any cohort (\u0026lambda; GC\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.02\u0026ndash;1.14 \u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary fig. S2\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eConditional analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTo identify secondary association signals, we used the program GCTA-COJO\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e102\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e to perform conditional analysis on the summary meta-analysis. GCTA-COJO (--cojo-cond) performs a secondary association analysis conditioned on discovered top variants; such conditional analysis is conducted with GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics rather than individual-level data of the full sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eSummary Statistics for Autoimmune Diseases and Other Traits\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe downloaded complete summary statistics for autoimmune and inflammatory disease GWAS available in the NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog (\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) and PubMed (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary table S5\u003c/strong\u003e). We focused on European ancestry studies with at least 2,000 study participants for which signed summary statistics were available. We chose the study with the largest cohort size, where multiple studies were available for a given trait. By applying these filters, we obtained GWAS statistics for the IgA nephropathy (IGA)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Obesity (OB)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Psoriasis (PS)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Type 1 diabetes (T1D)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Thyroiditis (TRD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Celiac disease(CeD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which IBD summary statistics also included results for Crohn\u0026rsquo;s disease and ulcerative colitis\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. We have also downloaded four neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer\u0026apos;s disease (AD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Frontotemporal dementia (FTD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Parkinson\u0026apos;s disease (PD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, four psychiatric disorders/traits: Bipolar disorder (BIP)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Major depressive disorder (MDD)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Neuroticism (Neuro)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Schizophrenia (SCZ)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and three metabolic traits: Type 2 diabetes (T2D)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio adjusted BMI (WHRadjBMI)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Given that most of the GWAS we collected were conducted in participants of European ancestry, we used the results of updated MS GWAS summary statistics in European ancestry for this analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe removed the Extended MHC region (xMHC) region from the summary statistics (defined as the regions between \u003cem\u003eHIST1H2AA\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eRPL12P1\u003c/em\u003e genes: chr6: 25,383,722\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;33,368,421Mb; ~7.6Mb, GRCh37). We then removed indels and SNPs inconsistent with the 1000 Genomes Project (phase 3) reference panel and filtered for strand-unambiguous biallelic SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF)\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.01 in the 1000 Genomes European (EUR) reference individuals.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eCross-trait LD score regression\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLDSC\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e103\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e bivariate genetic correlations attributed to genome-wide SNPs (rg) were estimated across 25 human diseases/traits from published GWASs, as mentioned above. We used LD scores from the \u0026lsquo;eur_w_ld_chr\u0026rsquo; file available from \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/LDSCORE\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, computed using 1000 Genomes Project\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e93\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e Europeans as a reference panel\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e104\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. FDR\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 was used to define significant genetic correlations by adjusting for the number of traits tested.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eGenome-wide polygenic score (GPS) design and optimization\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWe used PRS-CSx, a Bayesian polygenic modeling framework, to develop genomic prediction scores (GPS) across diverse ancestries\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. PRS-CSx integrates GWAS summary statistics from multiple populations, accounting for population-specific linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns. Specifically, we utilized GWAS summary statistics from three ancestral groups: African (AFR), European (EUR), and Admixed American (AMR), and combined them using the \u0026lsquo;meta\u0026rsquo; setting in PRS-CSx. In our study, 70% of the training data consisted of individuals of European ancestry from the eMERGE cohort (615 MS cases and 53,250 controls) to optimize model selection. To ensure no overlap between the GWAS discovery cohort and the GPS development dataset, the eMERGE dataset was excluded from the MS GWAS discovery cohort. We evaluated model robustness by running PRS-CSx with different values of the global shrinkage parameter: 1, 10⁻\u0026sup1;, 10⁻\u0026sup2;, 10⁻⁴, 10⁻⁶, and 10⁻⁸. The final GPS was selected based on the best-performing model for the training dataset (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary table S9\u003c/strong\u003e). The score was standardized to zero mean and unit variance based on ancestry-matched population controls. In the optimization dataset, the shrinkage parameter (10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;4\u003c/sup\u003e) explained 2% of the variance (R2), with 1 s.d. of the score increasing MS risk by 62% (odds ratio (OR)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI)\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.49\u0026ndash;1.75, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;5.33 \u0026times; 10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;32\u003c/sup\u003e) after controlling for age, sex, batch effects, and four genetic PCs. The final PRS-CSx output included 1,161,784 HapMap3\u003csup\u003e105\u003c/sup\u003e variants and their weights.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003ePheWAS\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe derived polygenic predictors for MS were used to score all 102,138 eMERGE participants with available genotypes and electronic health record (EHR) data. To test the association of these polygenic predictors with diseases in a phenome-wide manner, we first harmonized the diagnostic data by converting all available ICD-10-CM codes to the ICD-9-CM system. A total of 102,138 genotyped eMERGE participants had 20,783 unique ICD-9 codes, which were subsequently mapped to 1,817 distinct phecodes. Phenome-wide association analyses (PheWAS) were conducted using the PheWAS R package\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e106\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, which applies predefined control groups for each phecode. For case definition, at least two occurrences of ICD-9 codes within the case grouping of each phecode were required. Logistic regression was used to test associations between the MS polygenic score and each of the 1,817 phecodes, with case-control status as the outcome. The polygenic score for MS was adjusted for age, sex, study site, and ancestry\u0026apos;s first three principal components (PCs). We applied a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing to determine statistically significant disease associations, setting the significance threshold at 2.75 \u0026times; 10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;5\u003c/sup\u003e (0.05 divided by 1,817).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eMRI analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMultiple sclerosis (MS) participants were from the Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of Multiple Sclerosis at the Brigham and Women\u0026rsquo;s Hospital (CLIMB) study\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. CLIMB is a natural history observational study of MS in which participants undergo semi-annual neurological examinations and annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MS lesions and brain tissue compartments (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) were segmented using template-driven segmentation and partial volume artifact correction (TDS+) method\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e107\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e. Results underwent quality control and manual correction where necessary\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e108\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e (\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary fig. S7\u003c/strong\u003e). MRI and genome-wide genotyping data were available for 145 MS patients; 136 of them were European ancestry, 7 were AFR ancestry, and 2 were Hispanics. Among them, 130 are diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, and 15 are clinically isolated syndrome. GPS score for each participant was calculated using the PLINK command \u0026lsquo;--bfile --score sum \u0026ndash;out\u0026rsquo;\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e96\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e, and a regression model was used to test the association between GPS and MRI, adjusted for age at visit, sex, and top three genotype PCs.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv id=\"Sec26\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eColocalization analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe COLOC package (version 5.1.0)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e109\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e was applied to test the approximate Bayes factor (ABF) colocalization hypothesis, which assumes a single causal variant. Under ABF analysis, the association of a trait with a SNP is assessed by calculating the posterior probability (value from 0 to 1), with the value of 1 indicating the causal SNP. In addition, the ABF analysis has 5 hypotheses, where, PP.H0.abf indicates there is neither an eQTL nor a GWAS signal at the loci; PP.H1.abf indicates the locus is only associated with the GWAS; PP.H2.abf indicates the locus is only associated with the eQTL; PP.H3.abf indicates that both the GWAS and eQTL are associated but to a different genetic variant; PP.H4.abf indicates that the eQTL and the GWAS are associated to the same genetic variant. With the posterior probability of each SNP and aiming to find the casual variants between the GWAS and eQTL, we focused on extracting the PP.H4 value for each SNP in our study.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFor MS GWAS, we used the reported lead SNPs of 236 loci. For each locus, we searched for the eSNPs that are within 500 KB of the lead SNP, and listed eGenes that were paired with the eSNP. We then obtained the eGenes cis-eQTL output around the lead eSNP within 1 Mbp window size. In addition, we extracted GWAS summary statistics around the reported 236 lead SNP. At last, we conducted COLOC for respective pair of eGene-eQTL and eSNP-GWAS for each cell type, using eQTL summary statistics from the OneK1K cohort (982 PBMC samples, 14 blood cell types, browsable results are available at \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ewww.onek1k.org\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e)\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e63\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e and ROSMAP (424 DLPFC samples, 6 brain cell types, \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.7303/syn52335732\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e) cohort\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e62\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cspan type=\"BoldUnderline\" class=\"BoldUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eImmunohistochemistry staining for STAT3 and Glutamate decarboxylase 1 (GAD1)\u003c/span\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u003cspan type=\"BoldItalicUnderline\" class=\"BoldItalicUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e+\u003c/span\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u003cspan type=\"BoldUnderline\" class=\"BoldUnderline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eGlutamate decarboxylase 2 (GAD2)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFor validation immunostaining, a six \u0026micro;m formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue section from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann Area 9) of an MS individual was obtained from the New York Brain Bank at Columbia University. The tissue was stained with NeuN (1:100, 488 channel, Invitrogen, cat.# PA5-80745), STAT3 (1:100, 488 channel, Abcam cat.# ab20181), and GAD1\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;GAD2 (1:100, 647 channel, Wako cat.# 01919741). The FFPE tissue section was deparaffinized using CitriSolv (d-limonene, Decon Laboratories, Inc. cat.# 1601H) as a clearing agent for 20 minutes. The section was rehydrated and prepared for staining through a series of graded ethanol washes. Heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (pH\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6, Sigma-Aldrich catalog no. C9999) using a microwave (800W, 30% power setting) for 25 minutes. Following this, the section was blocked for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT) using a Bovine Serum Albumin-blocking medium (BSA, 3%, Sigma-Aldrich, catalog no. A7906) to minimize non-specific antibody binding. The section was incubated overnight with the primary antibodies (anti-STAT3 and anti-GAD1\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;GAD2) at 4\u0026deg;C. After washing, the tissues were incubated for one hour with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500, Alexa Fluor 488 and 568, Invitrogen, catalog no. A21206, A21202, A21447) to bind to the primary antibody for protein detection and signal enhancement. After washing, the slides were again incubated in 3% BSA for 30 min and stained with the NeuN-conjugated-647 antibody. After incubation, the section was washed and treated with True Black Lipofuscin Autofluorescence Quencher for 2 minutes at RT to minimize endogenous autofluorescence. An anti-fading DAPI mounting agent (347 channel, Invitrogen, catalog no. P36931) was used to coverslip.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eImages were acquired using the Nikon Eclipse Ni-E immunofluorescence microscope at a magnification of \u0026times;20), and approximately 44 pictures were acquired from the MS individual. The captured images were analysed using CellProfiler\u003csup\u003e\u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e110\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/sup\u003e software. An extensive pipeline has been developed to automatically segment the Neurons and detect \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e expressed by GAD1\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e and GAD2\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells\u003csup\u003e111\u003c/sup\u003e. DAPI and NeuN was defined as the primary object using the \u0026ldquo;IdentifyPrimaryObjects\u0026rdquo; module. The Robust Background method was used for thresholding. The typical diameter for DAPI objects was set to range between 15 and 80 pixels and between 30 and 80 pixels for NEUN objects. Then, the \u0026apos;RelateObjects\u0026apos; module was applied to filter NEUN objects positive for DAPI objects (NEUN\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;DAPI+). The module \u0026ldquo;IdentifyPrimaryObjects\u0026rdquo; was used to segment GAD1/GAD2\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;cells, using the Robust Background as the thresholding method, with a typical diameter ranging from 30 to 80 pixels. The segmented GAD1/GAD2\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;objects were related to NEUN\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;DAPI\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;filter GAD1/GAD2\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NEUN\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;DAPI\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;objects. The STAT3 intensity was measured within the GAD1/GAD2\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;NEUN\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;DAPI\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;objects.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank the participants who donated their time, life experiences and DNA to this research and the clinical and scientific teams that worked with them.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was funded by NIH grant nos. U01 AG061356 and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health\u0026rsquo;s Accelerating Medicines Program (P.L.D.), and K25DK128563. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eP.L.D. conceived the study and supervised the research; L.Z., A.K. performed computational analyses; M.F., F.Z., G.W., K.K., and P.L.D. provided and analyzed the data; M.T. carried out the immunofluorescence staining analysis; P.L.D. acquired the funding; L.Z., A.K., and P.L.D. wrote the original manuscript draft. L.Z., A.K., M.F., M.T., F.Z., G.W., K.K., P.L.D., and all other authors reviewed and edited the manuscript draft.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll authors declare no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C. Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility. Science 365(2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C. \u0026amp; Multiple, M.S.C. Locus for severity implicates CNS resilience in progression of multiple sclerosis. Nature 619, 323\u0026ndash;331 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDe Jager, P.L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The role of the CD58 locus in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 5264\u0026ndash;9 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational Multiple Sclerosis Genetics, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study. N Engl J Med 357, 851\u0026ndash;62 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOttoboni, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Clinical relevance and functional consequences of the TNFRSF1A multiple sclerosis locus. Neurology 81, 1891\u0026ndash;9 (2013).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMa, Q. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Integration of epigenetic and genetic profiles identifies multiple sclerosis disease-critical cell types and genes. Commun Biol 6, 342 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGregory, S.G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R) shows allelic and functional association with multiple sclerosis. Nat Genet 39, 1083\u0026ndash;91 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaurano, M.T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190\u0026ndash;5 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRaj, T. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. \u003cem\u003eScience\u003c/em\u003e 344, 519\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;23 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaier, L.M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Soluble IL-2RA levels in multiple sclerosis subjects and the effect of soluble IL-2RA on immune responses. J Immunol 182, 1541\u0026ndash;7 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePonath, G., Park, C. \u0026amp; Pitt, D. The Role of Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Immunol 9, 217 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbsinta, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e A lymphocyte-microglia-astrocyte axis in chronic active multiple sclerosis. Nature 597, 709\u0026ndash;714 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJakel, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 566, 543\u0026ndash;547 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDutta, R. \u0026amp; Trapp, B.D. Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Prog Neurobiol 93, 1\u0026ndash;12 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSchirmer, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Neuronal vulnerability and multilineage diversity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 573, 75\u0026ndash;82 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWegner, C., Esiri, M.M., Chance, S.A., Palace, J. \u0026amp; Matthews, P.M. Neocortical neuronal, synaptic, and glial loss in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 67, 960\u0026ndash;7 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParnell, G.P. \u0026amp; Booth, D.R. The Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Genetic Risk Factors Indicate both Acquired and Innate Immune Cell Subsets Contribute to MS Pathogenesis and Identify Novel Therapeutic Opportunities. Front Immunol 8, 425 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePatsopoulos, N.A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies novel multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci. Ann Neurol 70, 897\u0026ndash;912 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBycroft, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203\u0026ndash;209 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ee, M.C.E.a.a.b.e. \u0026amp; e, M.C. Harmonizing Clinical Sequencing and Interpretation for the eMERGE III Network. \u003cem\u003eAm J Hum Genet\u003c/em\u003e 105, 588\u0026ndash;605 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRamirez, A.H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity. Patterns (N Y) 3, 100570 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Polygenic risk affects the penetrance of monogenic kidney disease. medRxiv (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuan, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations. Nat Genet 54, 573\u0026ndash;580 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWiller, C.J., Li, Y. \u0026amp; Abecasis, G.R. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics 26, 2190\u0026ndash;1 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhernakova, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in celiac disease and rheumatoid arthritis identifies fourteen non-HLA shared loci. PLoS Genet 7, e1002004 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEyre, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e High-density genetic mapping identifies new susceptibility loci for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet 44, 1336\u0026ndash;40 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWiley, M.M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Variants in the DDX6-CXCR5 autoimmune disease risk locus influence the regulatory network in immune cells and salivary gland. \u003cem\u003ebioRxiv\u003c/em\u003e (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNakatsuka, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Two genetic variants explain the association of European ancestry with multiple sclerosis risk in African-Americans. Sci Rep 10, 16902 (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMagi, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Trans-ethnic meta-regression of genome-wide association studies accounting for ancestry increases power for discovery and improves fine-mapping resolution. Hum Mol Genet 26, 3639\u0026ndash;3650 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChang, C.C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIsobe, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e An ImmunoChip study of multiple sclerosis risk in African Americans. Brain 138, 1518\u0026ndash;30 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBeecham, A.H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The genetic diversity of multiple sclerosis risk among Hispanic and African American populations living in the United States. Mult Scler 26, 1329\u0026ndash;1339 (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSakaue, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes. Nat Genet 53, 1415\u0026ndash;1424 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJiang, L., Zheng, Z., Fang, H. \u0026amp; Yang, J. A generalized linear mixed model association tool for biobank-scale data. Nat Genet 53, 1616\u0026ndash;1621 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStuart, P.E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Transethnic analysis of psoriasis susceptibility in South Asians and Europeans enhances fine-mapping in the MHC and genomewide. HGG Adv 3(2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOkada, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e 506, 376\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;81 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJulia, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies five new loci for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 20, 100 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChiou, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics. Nature 594, 398\u0026ndash;402 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDubois, P.C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nat Genet 42, 295\u0026ndash;302 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ede Lange, K.M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet 49, 256\u0026ndash;261 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBellenguez, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Nat Genet 54, 412\u0026ndash;436 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003evan Rheenen, W. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat Genet 53, 1636\u0026ndash;1648 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFerrari, R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Frontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study. \u003cem\u003eLancet Neurol\u003c/em\u003e 13, 686\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;99 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNalls, M.A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol 18, 1091\u0026ndash;1102 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMullins, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat Genet 53, 817\u0026ndash;829 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHoward, D.M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci 22, 343\u0026ndash;352 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNagel, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nat Genet 50, 920\u0026ndash;927 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrubetskoy, V. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502\u0026ndash;508 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXue, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide association analyses identify 143 risk variants and putative regulatory mechanisms for type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun 9, 2941 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePulit, S.L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for body fat distribution in 694 649 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet 28, 166\u0026ndash;174 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBulik-Sullivan, B.K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 47, 291\u0026ndash;5 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLincoln, M.R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genetic mapping across autoimmune diseases reveals shared associations and mechanisms. Nat Genet 56, 838\u0026ndash;845 (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Investigating the shared genetic architecture between multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Nat Commun 12, 5641 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXia, Z. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis project: A platform to investigate multiple sclerosis risk. Ann Neurol 79, 178\u0026ndash;89 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRapp, D. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Associations between multiple sclerosis and incidence of heart diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Mult Scler Relat Disord 56, 103279 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGauthier, S.A., Glanz, B.I., Mandel, M. \u0026amp; Weiner, H.L. A model for the comprehensive investigation of a chronic autoimmune disease: the multiple sclerosis CLIMB study. Autoimmun Rev 5, 532\u0026ndash;6 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKerkering, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e iPSC-derived reactive astrocytes from patients with multiple sclerosis protect cocultured neurons in inflammatory conditions. J Clin Invest 133(2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePerriot, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Astrocytes Are Differentially Activated by Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Cytokines. Stem Cell Reports 11, 1199\u0026ndash;1210 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMatute-Blanch, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Inflammation in multiple sclerosis induces a specific reactive astrocyte state driving non-cell-autonomous neuronal damage. Clin Transl Med 12, e837 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePonath, G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Myelin phagocytosis by astrocytes after myelin damage promotes lesion pathology. Brain 140, 399\u0026ndash;413 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBryois, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Cell-type-specific cis-eQTLs in eight human brain cell types identify novel risk genes for psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nat Neurosci 25, 1104\u0026ndash;1112 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFujita, M. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Cell subtype-specific effects of genetic variation in the Alzheimer's disease brain. Nat Genet 56, 605\u0026ndash;614 (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYazar, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Single-cell eQTL mapping identifies cell type-specific genetic control of autoimmune disease. Science 376, eabf3041 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKaskow, B.J. \u0026amp; Baecher-Allan, C. Effector T Cells in Multiple Sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 8(2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFletcher, J.M., Lalor, S.J., Sweeney, C.M., Tubridy, N. \u0026amp; Mills, K.H. T cells in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Exp Immunol 162, 1\u0026ndash;11 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePonath, G. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Enhanced astrocyte responses are driven by a genetic risk allele associated with multiple sclerosis. Nat Commun 9, 5337 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBermel, R.A. \u0026amp; Bakshi, R. The measurement and clinical relevance of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 5, 158\u0026ndash;70 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRocca, M.A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Brain MRI atrophy quantification in MS: From methods to clinical application. Neurology 88, 403\u0026ndash;413 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMathys, H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Single-cell atlas reveals correlates of high cognitive function, dementia, and resilience to Alzheimer's disease pathology. Cell 186, 4365\u0026ndash;4385 e27 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXiong, X. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Epigenomic dissection of Alzheimer's disease pinpoints causal variants and reveals epigenome erosion. Cell 186, 4422\u0026ndash;4437 e21 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDuncan, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations. Nat Commun 10, 3328 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMartin, A.R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat Genet 51, 584\u0026ndash;591 (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMagyari, M. \u0026amp; Sorensen, P.S. Comorbidity in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 11, 851 (2020).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHauer, L., Perneczky, J. \u0026amp; Sellner, J. A global view of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review with a focus on regional differences, methodology, and clinical implications. J Neurol 268, 4066\u0026ndash;4077 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCriswell, L.A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Analysis of families in the multiple autoimmune disease genetics consortium (MADGC) collection: the PTPN22 620W allele associates with multiple autoimmune phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 76, 561\u0026ndash;71 (2005).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDevalliere, J. \u0026amp; Charreau, B. The adaptor Lnk (SH2B3): an emerging regulator in vascular cells and a link between immune and inflammatory signaling. Biochem Pharmacol 82, 1391\u0026ndash;402 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genetic regulation of serum IgA levels and susceptibility to common immune, infectious, kidney, and cardio-metabolic traits. Nat Commun 13, 6859 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGveric, D., Kaltschmidt, C., Cuzner, M.L. \u0026amp; Newcombe, J. Transcription factor NF-kappaB and inhibitor I kappaBalpha are localized in macrophages in active multiple sclerosis lesions. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57, 168\u0026ndash;78 (1998).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYan, J. \u0026amp; Greer, J.M. NF-kappa B, a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 7, 536\u0026ndash;57 (2008).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeibowitz, S.M. \u0026amp; Yan, J. NF-kappaB Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis and the Therapeutic Implications. Front Mol Neurosci 9, 84 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWiner, H. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e IL-7: Comprehensive review. Cytokine 160, 156049 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, Y., Ma, D. \u0026amp; Ji, C. Zinc fingers and homeoboxes family in human diseases. Cancer Gene Ther 22, 223\u0026ndash;6 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZoupi, L. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Selective vulnerability of inhibitory networks in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 141, 415\u0026ndash;429 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmolders, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Tissue-resident memory T cells populate the human brain. Nat Commun 9, 4593 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaecher-Allan, C., Kaskow, B.J. \u0026amp; Weiner, H.L. Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy. Neuron 97, 742\u0026ndash;768 (2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSalvador, A.F., de Lima, K.A. \u0026amp; Kipnis, J. Neuromodulation by the immune system: a focus on cytokines. Nat Rev Immunol 21, 526\u0026ndash;541 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZipp, F., Bittner, S. \u0026amp; Schafer, D.P. Cytokines as emerging regulators of central nervous system synapses. Immunity 56, 914\u0026ndash;925 (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHowie, B., Fuchsberger, C., Stephens, M., Marchini, J. \u0026amp; Abecasis, G.R. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat Genet 44, 955\u0026ndash;9 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHowie, B.N., Donnelly, P. \u0026amp; Marchini, J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet 5, e1000529 (2009).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Genome-wide polygenic score to predict chronic kidney disease across ancestries. Nat Med 28, 1412\u0026ndash;1420 (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eManichaikul, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867\u0026ndash;73 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbraham, G. \u0026amp; Inouye, M. Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data. PLoS One 9, e93766 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGenomes Project, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68\u0026ndash;74 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDas, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat Genet 48, 1284\u0026ndash;1287 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLoh, P.R. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat Genet 48, 1443\u0026ndash;1448 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePurcell, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. \u003cem\u003eAm J Hum Genet\u003c/em\u003e 81, 559\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;75 (2007).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhan, A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Medical Records-Based Genetic Studies of the Complement System. J Am Soc Nephrol 32, 2031\u0026ndash;2047 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShang, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Medical records-based chronic kidney disease phenotype for clinical care and \"big data\" observational and genetic studies. NPJ Digit Med 4, 70 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcCarthy, S. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet 48, 1279\u0026ndash;83 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDanecek, P. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156\u0026ndash;8 (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKennedy, A.E., Ozbek, U. \u0026amp; Dorak, M.T. What has GWAS done for HLA and disease associations? Int J Immunogenet 44, 195\u0026ndash;211 (2017).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Conditional and joint multiple-SNP analysis of GWAS summary statistics identifies additional variants influencing complex traits. Nat Genet 44, 369\u0026ndash;75, S1-3 (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBulik-Sullivan, B. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet 47, 1236\u0026ndash;41 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFinucane, H.K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat Genet 47, 1228\u0026ndash;35 (2015).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational HapMap, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e 467, 52\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;8 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDenny, J.C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 26, 1205\u0026ndash;10 (2010).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWu, Y. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesion subtypes with multichannel MRI. Neuroimage 32, 1205\u0026ndash;15 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTina Roostaei, A.S., Pia Kivis\u0026auml;kk, Cristin McCabe, Parham Nejad, Daniel Felsky, Hanane Touil, Ioannis S. Vlachos, Daniel Hui, Jennifer Fransson, Nikolaos A. Patsopoulos, Vijay K. Kuchroo, Violetta Zujovic, Howard L. Weiner, Hans-Ulrich Klein, Philip L. De Jager. Cell type- and state- resolved immune transcriptomic profiling identifies glucocorticoid-responsive molecular defects in multiple sclerosis T cells. (2022).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGiambartolomei, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLoS Genet 10, e1004383 (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarpenter, A.E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7, R100 (2006).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDuba-Kiss, R., Niibori, Y. \u0026amp; Hampson, D.R. GABAergic Gene Regulatory Elements Used in Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors. Front Neurol 12, 745159 (2021).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5644532/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5644532/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMultiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease affecting the brain and spinal cord. Genetic studies have identified many risk loci, that were thought to primarily impact immune cells and microglia. Here, we performed a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study with 20,831 MS and 729,220 control participants, identifying 236 susceptibility variants outside the Major Histocompatibility Complex, including four novel loci. We derived a polygenic score for MS and, optimized for European ancestry, it is informative for African-American and Latino participants. Integrating single-cell data from blood and brain tissue, we identified 76 genes affected by MS risk variants. Notably, while T cells showed the strongest enrichment, inhibitory neurons emerged as a key cell type. The expression of \u003cem\u003eIL7\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSTAT3\u003c/em\u003e are affected only in inhibitory neurons, highlighting the importance of neuronal and glial dysfunction in MS susceptibility.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"GWAS highlights the neuronal contribution to multiple sclerosis susceptibility","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-01-06 15:16:40","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5644532/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-genetics","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ng","sideBox":"Learn more about [Nature Genetics](http://www.nature.com/ng/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Genetics","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature Research","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a6e5b9ef-e34d-4c64-b47b-01f6c197d2b4","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 6th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":42344619,"name":"Biological sciences/Genetics/Genetic association study/Genome-wide association studies"},{"id":42344620,"name":"Biological sciences/Genetics/Gene expression"},{"id":42344621,"name":"Biological sciences/Genetics/Gene regulation"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-01T19:25:12+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-01-06 15:16:40","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5644532","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5644532","identity":"rs-5644532","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00