Microbiome in women with endometriosis and the in vitro effects of Lactobacillus reuteri on human endometrium
This study characterized the microbiome in women with and without endometriosis and found that Lactobacillus reuteri altered apoptosis and inflammation markers in endometrial cells in vitro under estrogenic conditions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study profiled the vaginal, endometrium (EM), and peritoneal microbiome in women with endometriosis (n=27) versus controls (n=14) using next-generation sequencing with differential abundance analyses, and it also performed in vitro experiments using primary endometriosis-derived endometrial stromal/EM cells co-cultured with Lactobacillus reuteri. Differential taxa were reported in multiple sites, including enriched species in the endometriosis group and validation by LEfSe and ANCOM-BC, and the in vitro work assessed L. reuteri effects on endometriosis-related gene expression and estrogen metabolism, including conditions with estradiol-17-glucuronide (E2G) and estrogen metabolite measurements by LC-MS/MS. The paper’s key limitation, as implied by its design, is that microbiome associations are cross-sectional and the mechanistic findings are confined to cell co-culture rather than in vivo physiology. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it links altered multi-site microbiome profiles with in vitro effects of Lactobacillus reuteri on endometriosis-derived human endometrium cells and estrogen-related pathways.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,506 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 6 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
References
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-14T06:08:20.186862+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-14T06:03:36.964175+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine