Abstract
Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) affects an estimated 4%-21% of patients following inguinal
hernia repair, with rates varying by technique, follow-up duration, and pain definition, and requires a
systematic, multidisciplinary evaluation. Inguinal endometriosis is a rare entity, representing approximately
0.07% of all endometriosis cases, and is an uncommonly recognized cause of inguinal pain that may mimic
CPIP. We present the case of a 37-year-old woman who developed new left-sided groin pain following an
elective bilateral robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Initial workup, including
physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was unremarkable, and conservative
management with activity modification, analgesics, and a targeted nerve block provided no sustained relief.
At 16 months postoperatively, the patient reported a palpable tender nodule near the left pubic symphysis
with symptoms that had become clearly cyclical in nature. A repeat MRI timed to coincide with her
menstrual cycle revealed soft tissue inflammation along the left round ligament near the pubic tubercle.
Surgical excision of the round ligament with concurrent ilioinguinal neurectomy was performed, and
histopathological analysis confirmed endometriosis. The patient experienced complete resolution of her
cyclical pain postoperatively. A brief literature review of 21 published studies on inguinal and round
ligament endometriosis was performed, which demonstrated that right-sided disease predominates, cyclical
symptoms are common but not universal, and misdiagnosis is frequent. This case highlights the importance
of considering inguinal endometriosis in the differential diagnosis of CPIP in women of reproductive age,
particularly when symptoms are cyclical or localized outside the expected operative field. Additionally, this
case underscores the potential diagnostic value of timing imaging studies to coincide with symptomatic
windows to improve sensitivity for catamenial pathology.
Categories:
Obstetrics/Gynecology, General Surgery, Anatomy
Keywords
chronic postoperative inguinal pain, groin pain, inguinal endometriosis, robotic hernia repair, round
ligament endometriosis
Introduction
Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) represents a potentially challenging condition for both surgeons
and patients. Recent advances in technique, including laparoscopic or robotic repairs, have been associated
with improved long-term pain compared with traditional open repairs
[1]
. Despite these improvements,
some cohort studies estimate CPIP between 4% and 21%, with between 2% and 4% of patients with
debilitating chronic pain
[1-3]
. When present, CPIP requires a methodical, stepwise workup with a
multidisciplinary team
[4]
.
Inguinal endometriosis, however, is a rare entity representing only 0.07% of endometriosis cases
[5]
. It may
be classified by the Niitsu classification system, with type I representing the most common presentation
within a hernia sac or canal of Nuck lesion, type II lesions on the round ligament, and type III lesions in the
subcutaneous tissue
[6]
. This case highlights a rare presentation of type II inguinal endometriosis
developing after a minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair and subsequently mimicking CPIP.
Case Presentation
A 37-year-old otherwise healthy female with no past surgical or gynecologic history presented with a two- to
three-year history of intermittent right groin bulge and vague pelvic pain. Her symptoms worsened with
physical activity, particularly lifting, and the bulge was always reducible. She was initially evaluated by a
gynecologist and underwent a transvaginal ultrasound due to her complaints of chronic pelvic pain.
Unfortunately, her transvaginal ultrasound was unrevealing. A subsequent CT scan identified bilateral
inguinal hernias, and she was referred to the general surgery clinic, where she was evaluated and scheduled
for operative repair.
The patient underwent an elective bilateral robotic-assisted laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal
1
1
1
1
1
Open Access Case Report
How to cite this article
Riggenbach Z W, Lutgens J, Williams B, et al. (July 13, 2026) Round Ligament Endometriosis Mimicking Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain
Following Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review. Cureus 18(7): e112592.
DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
(TAPP) inguinal hernia repair two months after her initial evaluation. Intraoperatively, bilateral indirect
hernia defects were identified and both repaired. The hernia sacs were found densely adherent to the round
ligaments bilaterally. To allow for complete reduction of the hernia sacs, both round ligaments were
transected. Both hernia defects were repaired with a macroporous, medium weight, self-adhering 10 x 15 cm
mesh, and the peritoneal flaps were closed. The remainder of the operation was unremarkable.
At her one-month postoperative visit, the patient reported new-onset left groin pain near the pubic
symphysis. Notably, this pain was unique from her preoperative symptoms, which had been isolated to the
right side. On examination, there was no evidence of hernia recurrence. She was otherwise progressing well
postoperatively, so the patient trialed conservative management, including activity modification.
Eight months postoperatively, the patient returned with persistent left-sided pain again localized to the area
around the pubic symphysis and exacerbated by activity. Examination revealed point tenderness but no
palpable hernia. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed and showed no evidence of hernia
recurrence or other significant abnormalities, as shown in Figure
1
. She was advised to continue rest and
oral analgesics. Additionally, she was referred to a chronic pain specialist for targeted nerve therapy. She
underwent a single injection targeting the ilioinguinal nerve, which provided transient relief for only a few
minutes.
FIGURE
1: MRI from eight-month follow-up
This figure shows MRI results of the patient, performed approximately eight months after the initial robotic-assisted
inguinal hernia repair. Note that there appears to be no evidence of inflammation near the round ligament insertion
and the mons pubis, or of hernia recurrence. The patient was not currently experiencing symptoms at the time of
this study.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
At 16 months postoperatively, the patient returned to the general surgery clinic with continued pain and
new symptoms. She reported a palpable nodule just to the left of the pubic symphysis in the area of maximal
discomfort. She also noted that her symptoms had become more clearly associated with her menstrual cycle
over the previous few months. At the time of evaluation, she was near the onset of her menstrual period, and
examination revealed a distinct, tender nodule with significant pain on palpation.
Given the presence of a palpable, tender mass and the cyclical nature of her symptoms, a repeat MRI was
performed, this time scheduled to coincide with the patient’s menstrual cycle. The imaging, shown in Figure
2
, revealed soft tissue edema and inflammation in the area of the left inguinal canal along the round
ligament near the pubic symphysis. The lesion measured approximately 1.5 cm in diameter. There remained
no evidence of hernia recurrence. She was started on oral contraceptive pills as a trial for hormonal
symptom suppression, which provided mild relief. Given the suspicion for round ligament endometriosis,
she was taken back to the operating room.
2026 Riggenbach et al. Cureus 18(7): e112592. DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
2
of
7
FIGURE
2: MRI from 16-month follow-up
This MRI was performed on the patient approximately 16 months after the original robotic-assisted hernia repair
and coincided with her cyclic maximal pain. Note: these images clearly demonstrate inflammation near the left
pubic tubercle and the round ligament, which later correlated with endometrial implants on the round ligament.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
A standard open herniorrhaphy incision was made approximately 2 cm cephalad and parallel to the left
inguinal ligament. Upon dissection, the round ligament was found to be inflamed, cystic, and densely
adherent to surrounding tissues. It was dissected to its most distal extent and resected near its insertion on
the pubic tubercle. An ilioinguinal neurectomy was also performed at that time. The excised round ligament
was sent for pathological analysis, which confirmed multiple endometrial implants. Postoperatively, the
previously described cyclical pelvic and pubic symphysis pain had resolved, and she remains pain free. She
noticed some groin numbness related to her ilioinguinal neurectomy, but this did not cause her any
significant distress and improved postoperatively.
Discussion
Literature review
A brief literature review was performed by searching the PubMed database for medical subject headings
(MeSH) terms ("round ligament" OR "inguinal" OR “canal of Nuck”) AND "endometriosis" AND ("hernia" OR
"herniorrhaphy" OR "TAPP" OR "TEP" OR "robotic" OR "laparoscopic"). Case reports, comparative studies,
evidence synthesis, meta-analysis, observational studies, review, scoping review, and systematic reviews
within the last 20 years were included. A total of 35 articles were identified. Non-English language, non-
inguinal location, and pediatric data were then excluded. This resulted in 21 articles for inclusion, as
detailed in Table
1
below
[7-27]
.
2026 Riggenbach et al. Cureus 18(7): e112592. DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
3
of
7
Author
Year
N
Side
Presentation
Imaging
Treatment
Fedele et al.
[7]
2007
5
M
Recurrent
US+MRI
RL excision
Ducarme et al.
[8]
2007
1
R
Post-repair
US+MRI
Excision + herniorrhaphy
Hagiwara et al.
[9]
2007
1
R
Cyclic
CT+MRI
Excision + RL resection
Mashfiqul et al.
[10]
2007
1
R
Non-cyclic
US
Wide excision + mesh
Kamio et al.
[11]
2009
1
R
Cyclic
US+MRI
Excision
Apostolidis et al.
[12]
2009
3
R
Cyclic
US
Excision
Wang et al.
[13]
2009
1
L
Cyclic
US+CT
Excision + laparoscopy
Kiyak et al.
[14]
2010
1
R
Cyclic
Path
Hernia repair + excision
Jiménez et al.
[15]
2011
1
R
Cyclic
CT+MRI
Laparoscopic excision
Prabhu et al.
[16]
2013
1
L
Pain/mass
US
Excision
Husain et al.
[17]
2015
1
R
Mass
MRI
Excision
Fong et al.
[18]
2019
1
R
Mass
None
Excision
Azhar et al.
[19]
2019
1
R
Acute
CT+MRI
Hernia repair + excision
AlSinan et al.
[20]
2021
1
L
Cyclic
US+CT
Excision + mesh
Chen et al.
[21]
2021
1
R
Nodule
US+CT
Excision + herniorrhaphy
Chou et al.
[22]
2023
2
M
Pain/mass
US+MRI
Excision ± hormones
Rokhgireh et al.
[23]
2024
1
R
Pain
MRI
Laparoscopic excision
Haghgoo et al.
[24]
2024
8
M
Swelling
US±MRI
Surgery ± hormones
Lipschultz et al.
[25]
2025
1
NR
Pain
MRI
Laparoscopic excision
Takatsuka et al.
[26]
2025
6
M
Pain/mass
Multi
Surgical excision
André et al.
[27]
2026
1
B
Pain
MRI
Laparoscopic RL excision
Present case
2026
1
L
CPIP
MRI×2
Open RL excision + IIN
TABLE
1: Clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and management of published cases of
inguinal and round ligament endometriosis
B, bilateral; CPIP, chronic postoperative inguinal pain; CT, computed tomography; IIN, ilioinguinal neurectomy; L, left; M, mixed laterality; MRI, magnetic
resonance imaging; Multi, multiple imaging modalities; NR, not reported; Path, diagnosis established by pathology; R, right; RL, round ligament; US,
ultrasonography.
Clinical presentation was reported in most studies and was characterized predominantly by groin pain and a
palpable inguinal mass. Pain was reported in 18 of 21 (85.7%) studies, while a palpable mass, swelling,
nodule, or groin lesion was described in 16 (76.2%) studies. Cyclic or catamenial symptoms were reported in
12 (57.1%) studies, although several reports documented non-cyclic or atypical presentations
[23,24]
.
Right-sided disease predominated throughout the literature. Right-sided involvement was reported in 13
(61.9%) studies, whereas left-sided disease was reported in 4 (19.0%) studies. Bilateral involvement was
uncommon and described only by André et al.
[27]
. Several case series similarly emphasized a strong right-
sided predominance, consistent with the historically reported distribution of inguinal endometriosis. The
predominance of right-sided disease appears to be one of the most consistent findings across the surveyed
literature. However, anatomic involvement varied among reports. Round ligament involvement was
specifically described in 11 of 21 (52.4%) studies of the included studies
[9,12,16,23,24]
. Additional sites of
involvement included the canal of Nuck, abdominal wall scar tissue, subcutaneous soft tissues, and other
structures within the inguinal canal
[8,13,15]
. These findings appear generally consistent with the previously
described Niitsu classification system
[6]
.
Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis appears common, with hernias, lymphadenopathy, or hydroceles
2026 Riggenbach et al. Cureus 18(7): e112592. DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
4
of
7
representing commonly confused pathologies
[20,24]
. Ultrasonography was the most commonly reported
imaging modality and was used in 15 of 21 (71.4%) studies, while MRI was used in 14 of 21 (66.7%) studies,
often as an adjunctive modality to further characterize lesions identified on physical examination or
ultrasonography. Computed tomography was reported in 7 of 21 (33.3%) studies. Despite advances in
imaging, histopathologic examination following surgical excision remained the definitive diagnostic
method.
Prior abdominal or pelvic surgery was commonly reported, particularly cesarean delivery and prior
gynecologic procedures
[8,17,19]
. Several studies additionally documented concurrent pelvic endometriosis,
infertility, dysmenorrhea, or ovarian endometrioma, suggesting substantial overlap between inguinal
disease and more typical manifestations of endometriosis
[7,24]
. Nevertheless, isolated inguinal disease
without known pelvic involvement was also reported in multiple cases
[10,16,20]
.
Management was overwhelmingly surgical. Surgical treatment was reported in all 21 studies providing
treatment information (100%), most commonly consisting of complete excision of the lesion with resection
of the involved round ligament, hernia sac, or adjacent soft tissue. Reported outcomes were generally
favorable, with most studies describing symptom resolution and low rates of recurrence following surgical
management.
Case analysis
This case presentation represents a previously undescribed type II inguinal endometriosis following a
minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair produced CPIP. Several unique components of this presentation
warrant discussion. First, this case represents a relatively rare left-sided presentation of inguinal
endometriosis. Interestingly, the patient initially noted right-sided pain before her hernia repair. Her left-
sided symptoms, however, were new following her robotic inguinal hernia repair. The relative rarity of left-
sided inguinal endometriosis combined with the temporal relationship to her TAPP repair raises the
possibility of direct endometrial implant seeding during her operation as a possible pathogenesis. While this
is a single case and cannot be construed as causality, surgeons may consider a patient’s previous
gynecologic history carefully when evaluating chronic inguinal or CPIP-type symptoms.
This case also highlights both the difficulty in diagnosing inguinal endometriosis and the need for a rigorous
workup during CPIP evaluation. While cyclical symptoms were reported frequently in the literature, this case
highlights that imaging findings diagnostic of inguinal endometriosis may also be catamenial. In this case,
the patient reported specific symptoms, which were consistent with inguinal endometriosis, and the surgical
team held a high clinical suspicion. However, the initial imaging, which was not timed with her symptoms,
did not provide any diagnostic utility. This case highlights the importance of timing imaging studies with
symptomatic windows to maximize diagnostic value.
Finally, this case highlights the importance of providing a thorough evaluation for patients with CPIP, as
some causes may be reversible. Key clinical insights that this patient’s presentation did not fit typical CPIP
included cyclical pain, point tenderness to palpation outside of the expected operative field, and failure of
traditional pain management techniques. A generic algorithmic approach to treating these patients without
a thorough history and examination may have led to unnecessary morbidity for this patient. The evaluation
of CPIP requires a thorough history and examination not only to rule out hernia recurrence but also to
evaluate for causes of potentially reversible symptoms, as demonstrated in this case. A multidisciplinary
approach offers an opportunity for thoughtful and tailored evaluations and may benefit from earlier
gynecologist involvement in cases of atypical CPIP in female patients.
Conclusions
Round ligament endometriosis is a rare but important cause of groin pain that may mimic CPIP in women of
reproductive age. This case demonstrates that cyclical symptoms, atypical pain location, and failure of
conventional CPIP therapies should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses. Key features that
suggested the diagnosis were point tenderness and cyclic symptom presentations. Timing imaging studies to
coincide with symptomatic periods may improve diagnostic yield for catamenial pathology. Surgical excision
remains an effective treatment and can result in complete symptom resolution.
Additional Information
Author Contributions
All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the
work.
Concept and design:
Zac W. Riggenbach, Jonathan Lutgens, Brooklyn Williams, Abigail Kelly, Jason
Bingham
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:
Zac W. Riggenbach
2026 Riggenbach et al. Cureus 18(7): e112592. DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
5
of
7
Drafting of the manuscript:
Zac W. Riggenbach
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:
Zac W. Riggenbach, Jonathan
Lutgens, Brooklyn Williams, Abigail Kelly, Jason Bingham
Supervision:
Jason Bingham
Disclosures
Human subjects:
Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all
participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all
authors declare the following:
Payment/services info:
All authors have declared that no financial support
was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships:
All authors have
declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any
organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships:
The views expressed
in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the
Department of the Army, Department of War, or the U.S. Government.
Acknowledgements
During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA) and
OpenEvidence to assist with text editing for readability and grammar, as well as synthesizing findings from
the literature review. Following the use of these tools, all authors reviewed, verified, and edited the
generated content for accuracy and completeness. The authors take full responsibility for the content,
integrity, and scientific validity of this publication.
References
1
.
Sekhon Inderjit Singh HK, Massey LH, Arulampalam T, Motson RW, Pawa N:
Chronic groin pain following
inguinal hernia repair in the laparoscopic era: systematic review and meta-analysis
. Am J Surg. 2022,
224:1135-49.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.005
2
.
Chu Z, Zheng B, Yan L:
Incidence and predictors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic
review and meta-analysis
. Hernia. 2024, 28:967-87.
10.1007/s10029-024-02980-7
3
.
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Forse RA:
Clinical practice. Groin hernias in adults
. N Engl J Med. 2015, 372:756-63.
10.1056/NEJMcp1404068
4
.
International guidelines for groin hernia management
. Hernia. 2018, 22:1-165.
10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
5
.
Sun Z-J, Zhu L, Lang J-H:
A rare extrapelvic endometriosis: inguinal endometriosis
. J Reprod Med. 2010,
55:62-6.
6
.
Niitsu H, Tsumura H, Kanehiro T, Yamaoka H, Taogoshi H, Murao N:
Clinical characteristics and surgical
treatment for inguinal endometriosis in young women of reproductive age
. Dig Surg. 2019, 36:166-72.
10.1159/000489827
7
.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Zanconato G, Rubino T:
Radical excision of inguinal endometriosis
. Obstet
Gynecol. 2007, 110:530-3.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000268803.84556.0b
8
.
Ducarme G, Uzan M, Poncelet C:
Endometriosis mimicking hernia recurrence
. Hernia. 2007, 11:175-7.
10.1007/s10029-006-0159-2
9
.
Hagiwara Y, Hatori M, Moriya T, Terada Y, Yaegashi N, Ehara S, Kokubun S:
Inguinal endometriosis
attaching to the round ligament
. Australas Radiol. 2007, 51:91-4.
10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01667.x
10
.
Mashfiqul MAS, Tan YM, Chintana CW:
Endometriosis of the inguinal canal mimicking a hernia
. Singapore
Med J. 2007, 48:157-9.
11
.
Kamio M, Nagata T, Yamasaki H, Yoshinaga M, Douchi T:
Inguinal hernia containing functioning,
rudimentary uterine horn and endometriosis
. Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 113:563-6.
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181942068
12
.
Apostolidis S, Michalopoulos A, Papavramidis TS, Papadopoulos VN, Paramythiotis D, Harlaftis N:
Inguinal
endometriosis: three cases and literature review
. South Med J. 2009, 102:206-7.
10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318186d36e
13
.
Wang CJ, Chao AS, Wang TH, Wu CT, Chao A, Lai CH:
Challenge in the management of endometriosis in
the canal of Nuck
. Fertil Steril. 2009, 91:936.e9-11.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1713
14
.
Kiyak G, Ergul E, Sarikaya SM, Yazgan A:
Endometriosis of the groin hernia sac: report of a case and review
of the literature
. Hernia. 2010, 14:215-7.
10.1007/s10029-009-0532-z
15
.
Jiménez JS, Barbero P, Tejerizo A, Guillén C, Strate C:
A laparoscopic approach to Nuck's duct endometriosis
.
Fertil Steril. 2011, 96:e103-5.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.083
16
.
Prabhu R, Krishna S, Shenoy R, Thangavelu S:
Endometriosis of extra-pelvic round ligament, a diagnostic
dilemma for physicians
. BMJ Case Rep. 2013, 2013:
10.1136/bcr-2013-200465
17
.
Husain F, Siddiqui ZA, Siddiqui M:
A case of endometriosis presenting as an inguinal hernia
. BMJ Case Rep.
2015, 2015:
10.1136/bcr-2014-208099
18
.
Fong KN, Lau TW, Mak CC, Lui KW:
Inguinal endometriosis: a differential diagnosis of right groin swelling
in women of reproductive age
. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12:
10.1136/bcr-2019-229864
19
.
Azhar E, Mohammadi SM, Ahmed FM, Waheed A:
Extrapelvic endometrioma presenting as acute
incarcerated right inguinal hernia in a postpartum patient
. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12:
10.1136/bcr-2019-
231213
20
.
AlSinan FM, Alsakran AS, Foula MS, Al Omoush TM, Al-Bisher H:
Inguinal endometriosis in a nulliparous
woman mimicking an inguinal hernia: a case report with literature review
. Am J Case Rep. 2021,
2026 Riggenbach et al. Cureus 18(7): e112592. DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
6
of
7
22:e934564.
10.12659/AJCR.934564
21
.
Chen PC, Cheng CH, Ding DC:
Primary inguinal subcutaneous endometriosis accompanied with an inguinal
hernia: a case report
. Medicine. 2021, 100:e25460.
10.1097/MD.0000000000025460
22
.
Chou CW, Lai PT, Huang CC, Hong JB, Tai YJ:
Primary spontaneous inguinal endometriosis: two cases with
emphasis on the diagnostic approach
. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023, 62:474-9.
10.1016/j.tjog.2023.02.003
23
.
Rokhgireh S, MehdizadehKashi A, Noroozi SG, Aminzade Z, Derakhshan R:
Laparoscopic surgery for
endometriosis of the round ligament: a case of a patient with right-sided inguinal pain
. Womens Health
(Lond). 2024, 20:17455057241257174.
10.1177/17455057241257174
24
.
Haghgoo A, Faegh A, Mostafavi SR, Zamani HR, Ghahremani M:
Inguinal endometriosis: a case series and
review of the literature
. J Med Case Rep. 2024, 18:83.
10.1186/s13256-024-04400-x
25
.
Lipschultz RA, Lee TT:
Inguinal canal endometriosis
. Fertil Steril. 2025, 124:381-2.
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.03.035
26
.
Takatsuka S, Kataoka H, Ito F, Shimura K, Mori T:
Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of inguinal
endometriosis: a case series of six patients
. Reprod Sci. 2025, 32:647-54.
10.1007/s43032-025-01796-9
27
.
André M, Figuier C, Chauveau B, Canis M:
Laparoscopic treatment of bilateral inguinal round ligament
endometriosis
. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2026, 33:500.
10.1016/j.jmig.2025.11.018
2026 Riggenbach et al. Cureus 18(7): e112592. DOI 10.7759/cureus.112592
7
of
7
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.