Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean

Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340" }, "headline": "Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the...", "datePublished": "2023-10-16T15:12:57", "dateModified": "2024-07-18T16:17:49", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Diego Urrunaga-Pastor" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Guido Bendezu-Quispe" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Deici Dávila-Altamirano" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Milagritos N. Asmat" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Jordi Grau-Monge" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Objective: To evaluate the scientific production on university social responsibility (USR) from institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on documents published in indexed journals in the Scopus database from its inception until April 2023. Eligible documents included those on USR describing experiences carried out by universities in Latin America and the Caribbean. The number of articles per author, average authors per article, average citations per article, and the number of documents with one or more author were described. Bibliometric indicators regarding authors per article, co-authors per article, and institutional collaboration were presented. Bibliometric networks were constructed based on bibliographic coupling analysis of documents by countries and term co-occurrence in titles and abstracts. Results: Of a total of 4075 documents retrieved from Scopus, 150 were included. Documents published between 1997 and 2023 were identified, with an average annual growth rate of 2.7%. A total of 439 authors were identified, 18 articles had a single author, and an average of 0.3 articles per author and a co-authorship index of 3.13 were found. The percentage of international collaborations was 30.7%. Brazil had the highest proportion of publications (26.4%), followed by Chile (17%) and Colombia (13.2%). Opción and Revista de Ciencias Sociales were the journals with the highest number of articles published (13 each). In the analysis of term co-occurrence, recent years showed an increase in the use of terms related to e-learning, information and communication technologies, virtual education, COVID-19, sustainable development goals, and URSULA (initiative on USR in institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean). Conclusions: A growth in scientific production on USR in Latin America and the Caribbean was identified. The interest in USR documents in recent years has been focused on COVID-19 and the challenges of virtual education and sustainable development." } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2", "name": "Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social..." } } ] } Home Browse Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Urrunaga-Pastor D, Bendezu-Quispe G, Dávila-Altamirano D et al. Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] Diego Urrunaga-Pastor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-162X 1,2 , Guido Bendezu-Quispe 3 , Deici Dávila-Altamirano 2 , Milagritos N. Asmat 2 , Jordi Grau-Monge 2 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-162X 1,2 , Guido Bendezu-Quispe 3 , [...] Deici Dávila-Altamirano 2 , Milagritos N. Asmat 2 , Jordi Grau-Monge 2 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2024 Author details Author details 1 Grupo de Bibliometría, Evaluación de Evidencia y Revisiones Sistemáticas (BEERS), Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 2 Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 3 Centro de Investigación Epidemiológica en Salud Global, Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru Diego Urrunaga-Pastor Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Guido Bendezu-Quispe Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Deici Dávila-Altamirano Roles: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Milagritos N. Asmat Roles: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Jordi Grau-Monge Roles: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Objective: To evaluate the scientific production on university social responsibility (USR) from institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted on documents published in indexed journals in the Scopus database from its inception until April 2023. Eligible documents included those on USR describing experiences carried out by universities in Latin America and the Caribbean. The number of articles per author, average authors per article, average citations per article, and the number of documents with one or more author were described. Bibliometric indicators regarding authors per article, co-authors per article, and institutional collaboration were presented. Bibliometric networks were constructed based on bibliographic coupling analysis of documents by countries and term co-occurrence in titles and abstracts. Results: Of a total of 4075 documents retrieved from Scopus, 150 were included. Documents published between 1997 and 2023 were identified, with an average annual growth rate of 2.7%. A total of 439 authors were identified, 18 articles had a single author, and an average of 0.3 articles per author and a co-authorship index of 3.13 were found. The percentage of international collaborations was 30.7%. Brazil had the highest proportion of publications (26.4%), followed by Chile (17%) and Colombia (13.2%). Opción and Revista de Ciencias Sociales were the journals with the highest number of articles published (13 each). In the analysis of term co-occurrence, recent years showed an increase in the use of terms related to e-learning, information and communication technologies, virtual education, COVID-19, sustainable development goals, and URSULA (initiative on USR in institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean). Conclusions: A growth in scientific production on USR in Latin America and the Caribbean was identified. The interest in USR documents in recent years has been focused on COVID-19 and the challenges of virtual education and sustainable development. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords University social responsibility, Latin America, University, Higher education, Community Corresponding Author(s) Diego Urrunaga-Pastor ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Diego Urrunaga-Pastor Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2024 Urrunaga-Pastor D et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Urrunaga-Pastor D, Bendezu-Quispe G, Dávila-Altamirano D et al. Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.2 ) First published: 16 Oct 2023, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.1 ) Latest published: 18 Jul 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.2 ) Revised Amendments from Version 1 The revised version of the manuscript includes changes to the introduction and an expanded description of the results. We have also enriched the discussion with relevant background information and extended the conclusion of the manuscript. The reviewers' feedback has been carefully considered to enhance this revised version. The revised version of the manuscript includes changes to the introduction and an expanded description of the results. We have also enriched the discussion with relevant background information and extended the conclusion of the manuscript. The reviewers' feedback has been carefully considered to enhance this revised version. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Mikel Perez-Gutierrez See the authors' detailed response to the review by Maria Jesus Martinez Usarralde and Nicolás Ponce Diaz READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction In recent decades university social responsibility (USR) has gained increasing importance both in the academic and social spheres. 1 USR refers to the commitment of higher education institutions to actively contribute to the sustainable development of society through the generation and application of knowledge, as well as the training of ethical and responsible professionals. 1 – 4 It is essential to study USR to understand the impact of universities on their environment and foster greater integration between academia and society. 5 Research on USR provides valuable insights into practices, challenges, and opportunities related to social responsibility in the university context. 6 The scientific literature has addressed USR from different perspectives, but it is necessary to specifically analyze the scientific production in Latin American universities. Several previous studies have analyzed the topic of USR in different regions of the world, such as Europe and globally. 7 – 12 However, research focused on Latin America and the Caribbean still presents significant gaps in terms of scientific production in this field. Bibliometric analysis is a useful methodology for the quantitative study of articles published in an area of knowledge and its activity indicators in relation to the number of publications and their productivity during a given period. 13 , 14 It is less susceptible to researcher bias than narrative studies for this purpose when reporting results of statistical analysis. 13 , 14 Understanding the current situation and trends in USR in Latin American universities will help identify areas for improvement and best practices, as well as provide a solid foundation for decision-making and policy formulation. 7 , 15 Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the scientific production in USR related to institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean, through bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Scopus database. It is expected to identify possible gaps and challenges in current scientific production, which will contribute to guiding future research and promoting academic collaboration in the region. 5 , 16 Methods Study design A bibliometric analysis was conducted on the scientific production of USR in institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. 17 Scientific articles indexed in the Scopus database were included from its inception until April 2023. Articles addressing USR and describing an experience conducted by a university in Latin America and the Caribbean were included, regardless of the study design. Database The Scopus database was chosen for the present bibliometric analysis due to its breadth and coverage of scientific articles (wide range of subjects), includes useful tools for author disambiguation, as well as its availability of metadata useful for this type of analysis. 18 , 19 Search strategy The search strategy was conducted by one of the authors (GBQ) and included free terms used for searching the title, abstract, and keywords of the articles indexed in the Scopus database. The search formula is described in detail in a repository. 20 The search strategy was independently reviewed and evaluated by another author (DUP). The search was not restricted by year or language of publication. Data collection Data for each research article found during the search were downloaded as a.csv file from Scopus and imported into the Rayyan website. Two authors (DUP and GBQ) reviewed the title and abstract of each article to assess compliance with the eligibility criteria. Bibliometric analysis The Bibliometrix package in the R Studio statistical program was used for the analysis. One author (GBQ) manually standardized the names and affiliations of the authors found. The characteristics of the included articles were described, including the number of articles per author, average number of authors per article, average number of citations per article, and the number of documents with one or more author. Information about the authors, countries, and journals with the highest number of documents about USR was presented. Additionally, useful indicators for bibliometric evaluation, such as the authorship rate (ratio between the total number of articles and the total number of authors), co-authorship rate (average number of co-authors per article), and collaboration rate (ratio between the total number of authors of articles with multiple authors and the total number of articles with multiple authors) were described. The VOSviewer software was used to construct and observe bibliometric networks based on bibliographic coupling analysis, using information on the countries of institutions with documents on USR, and an overlay visualization was constructed based on the co-occurrence of terms in titles and abstracts (using the score attribute average publication year). In temporal co-occurrence of terms, the software calculates the mean year of occurrence for the keyword across the timeline. It assigns a temporally ordered color to the keyword node of the map, as darker-colored nodes show topics studied in earlier years, while lighter-colored nodes show topics in recent years. No threshold was set for the inclusion of terms for the analysis of term co-occurrence. For this analysis, terms related to USR were excluded. Ethical considerations Data from documents published in journals indexed in the Scopus bibliographic database, which do not include confidential data of human subjects, were analyzed. Therefore, ethical committee approval was not required for this study. Results A total of 4,075 records were retrieved from the SCOPUS bibliographic database. After excluding documents that did not meet the eligibility criteria, 150 scientific articles were included ( Figure 1 ). We included articles published between 1997 and 2023 ( Figure 2 ). An increase in the number of scientific articles on USR was identified, with an average annual growth rate of 2.7%. The year 2022 had the highest number of published documents. Figure 1. Flowchart of selection. Figure 2. Scientific production in Scopus during the study period. Regarding the authors of the documents, a total of 439 authors was identified. On average, there were 0.3 articles per author, a co-authorship index per document of 3.13, and 18 articles had a single author. The percentage of international collaborations was 30.7%. The authors Severino-González P (12 articles) and Sarmiento-Peralta G (4 articles) had the highest number of scientific publications ( Table 1 ). Table 1. Authors with the highest scientific production (≥2 or more documents) in Scopus related to university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean. Author * Number of publications Severino-González P 12 Sarmiento-Peralta G 4 Rubio-Rodríguez Ga 3 Acuña-Moraga O 2 Calderón AI 2 Chalco KYM 2 Del Castillo CAS 2 Delgado FAD 2 Delgado MFF 2 García Martínez J 2 Machaca ESM 2 Martí-Noguera JJ 2 Quezada RG 2 Quintanilla KPB 2 Ramos Parra C 2 Romero-Argueta J 2 Vallaeys F 2 * Only authors with ≥2 documents are presented. In terms of the country of origin of the institutional affiliation of the corresponding authors of the articles on USR, Brazil had the highest proportion of publications (26.4%), followed by Chile (17%) and Colombia (13.2%). Brazil had the highest number of documents as the sole country of institutional affiliations of the authors (12 documents). Additionally, Brazil topped the list of countries with the highest number of citations and average citations per article, with 58 and 4.1, respectively, followed by Chile (49 and 5.4, respectively) and Colombia (45 and 6.4, respectively) ( Table 2 ). These three countries (Brazil, Chile, and Colombia), along with Peru, were of note in international network collaboration in publications on USR ( Figure 3 ). Table 2. Countries with the highest number of corresponding author and its total citations and average citations per article in Scopus related to university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean. Country * Number of articles (%) Total citations Average citations per article Brazil 14 (26.4) 58 4.1 Chile 9 (17.0) 49 5.4 Colombia 7 (13.2) 45 6.4 Mexico 5 (9.4) 7 1.4 Spain 5 (9.4) 42 8.4 Venezuela 5 (9.4) 12 2.4 Ecuador 3 (5.7%) 3 1 * Only countries with ≥3 corresponding author are presented. Figure 3. Collaboration network among countries on scientific production related to university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean. Regarding citations, the articles had an average of 4.6 citations. The articles by Sánchez-Hernández MI (2016) and Vallaeys F (2019) had the highest number of citations (42 and 36, with an average citation rate of 5.3 and 7.2 per year, respectively). Opción and Revista de Ciencias Sociales were the journals in which the highest number of articles were published, with 13 each ( Table 3 ). Table 3. Journals with the highest number of publications in Scopus related to university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal Number of articles * Opción 13 Revista de Ciencias Sociales 13 Revista Venezolana de Gerencia 11 Espacios 8 Formación Universitaria 7 Universidad y Sociedad 5 Interciencia 3 International Journal of Educational Management 3 Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior 3 Sustainability (Switzerland) 3 World Sustainability Series 3 * Only journals with ≥3 documents are presented. In the co-occurrence analysis of terms ( Figure 4 ), it was identified that in the early years, publications on USR referred to terms such as ethics, knowledge, and teaching. In more recent years, the use of terms related to e-learning, information and communication technologies, virtual education, COVID-19, sustainable development goals, and URSULA (initiative on USR in Latin American and Caribbean institutions) became evident. Figure 4. Analysis of term co-occurrence in titles and abstracts (overlap visualization) and its temporal evolution using VOSviewer software in relation to scientific publications in Scopus related to university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean. Analysis of term co-occurrence in titles and abstracts (overlap visualization) and its temporal evolution using VOSviewer software in relation to scientific publications in Scopus related to university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean. Discussion In this study, we evaluated and characterized the scientific production related to USR by institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean using the Scopus database. We found an increase in scientific production over the past ten years, reaching a peak in 2022. According to the co-occurrence analysis of terms, recent documents on USR encompass topics related to the use of information and communication technologies, COVID-19, and sustainable development. The observed increase in the scientific production on USR by institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean was also a finding reported in a study on scientific production regarding USR at a global level between 2001 and 2019, 7 and could be attributed to a growing social awareness and commitment, manifested through increased investment and recognition by higher education institutions in social development. Additionally, due to significant social inequalities and challenges in areas such as poverty, education, health, and the environment, institutions in the region may show a greater interest in USR. 21 – 23 Promoting research in this region could be facilitated by establishing close and collaborative partnerships between communities and universities. This entails working together to identify and address social issues and promote sustainable development. 6 Furthermore, we identified peaks in scientific production between 2019 and 2022, which could be attributed to an upsurge in scientific output related to the COVID-19 pandemic. 24 – 26 This is evident in the co-occurrence analysis of terms, where the term "COVID-19" is of note as one of the most frequently mentioned. There was a predominance of countries such as Brazil, Chile, and Colombia in the publication of documents on USR by institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. This finding aligns with the scientific production of these countries, which lead in research output in the region. 27 – 29 It is worth noting that the countries with the highest contributions to scientific production are of middle and high income. Findings from other studies that have examined the potential relationship between income and scientific production. 30 Therefore, it is possible that country-level promotion and initiatives explain this finding in countries with higher scientific production and not the country income level. The authors with the highest scientific production did not exceed 13 scientific articles in Scopus, with researchers affiliated with institutions in Chile, Peru, and Colombia being of note, respectively. These countries, along with Brazil, demonstrate clear regional collaboration as well as collaboration with countries with advanced scientific development, as shown in the collaborative network graph. In various fields of knowledge, north-south collaboration is described as part of the early research development process in countries with lower scientific development. 31 , 32 This influence may be observed in the development of research on USR in the Latin American and Caribbean region. On the other hand, the gap between the top-producing author and the second highest is eight articles, which reinforces the idea that USR is a young and growing field. The scientific journal with the highest number of articles published was Opción , followed by the Revista de Ciencias Sociales and the Revista Venezolana de Gerencia. These journals publish papers related to social sciences, humanities, and education. This is consistent with a previous study, 33 which explains that USR primarily falls within the field of social sciences, education, and humanities. Additionally, these journals were also reported previously as leaders in publication regarding USR worldwide. 33 Therefore, documents on USR from institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean would be of interest to these journals and their readers. All three journals are Venezuelan and have been indexed in Scopus for no more than 15 years. This aligns with the years when an increase in scientific production related to USR in Latin American institutions was observed. The co-occurrence analysis of terms indicates that documents on USR from Latin American and Caribbean institutions have shifted from general aspects, such as ethics and education, to focusing on current challenges, such as the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual education, and the use of information and communication technologies. As described in other fields, it is expected that over the years publications on a topic, such as USR, would shift focus from generalities to addressing its current applicability and challenges. Among the recently used terms is URSULA (Latin American Union for University Social Responsibility), which seeks to provide innovative proposals to improve the social and environmental role of universities through dialogue among different stakeholders, such as civil society, governments, scientists, and businesses. 34 In recent years, some Latin American countries have worked on implementing policies and programs that promote USR. 6 , 16 , 35 These initiatives may include incentives, funding, or specific requirements for academic institutions to conduct research and projects aimed at social well-being. This situation, combined with increased access to resources and technology in academic institutions, would generate greater opportunities for scientific research and the dissemination of its results, which could also explain the increase in scientific production on USR in the region. To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR from institutions in Latin America. The results are valuable for identifying the current status and growth of this area. Additionally, we can identify authors who work in this field and the journals that frequently publish related articles. Among the potential limitations of this research, it should be mentioned that articles published in databases other than Scopus were not included, which means that some documents on USR from institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean may not have been considered. However, we believe that using Scopus, a reliable and widely employed source for bibliometric studies, ensures that the results obtained are from documents published in journals with quality criteria, such as peer review, and the requirements demanded by the bibliographic database for the inclusion of indexed journals, that is, the documents retrieved through the search strategy in this study. In this bibliometric analysis, a review of the title and abstract of the documents was conducted for their inclusion in the analysis, which strengthens the study as it ensured the inclusion of only documents on USR. Conclusions In conclusion, there is an increase in scientific production on USR by researchers from institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. The countries leading the research in the region (Brazil, Chile, and Colombia) also show leadership in documents on USR in Latin America and Caribbean institutions. Around a third of the scientific production at URS by institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean is carried out by international collaboration. In recent years, the focus of documents on USR by Latin American and Caribbean institutions has been on COVID-19, virtual education, and sustainable development. Quantifying the scientific production on USR in Latin America and the Caribbean provides a baseline for future research in the field that may consider the use of other bibliographic databases, including regional databases as well as gray literature to evaluate scientific production on MSW more comprehensively. Data availability Figshare: Search strategy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26180854 . 20 This project contains the following underlying data: • An.docx file containing revised Scopus search strategy used to perform this bibliometric analysis. Figshare: Database containing the articles included in the analysis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24069399 . 36 This project contains the following underlying data: • An.xls file containing the database of articles included in the bibliometric analysis is available. Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC BY 4.0 Public domain dedication). Acknowledgment We would like to express our gratitude to the Universidad Científica del Sur for their English editing support and financial assistance in covering the article processing charge. References 1. Ali M, Mustapha I, Osman S, et al. : University social responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis. J. Clean Prod. 2021; 286 : 124931. Publisher Full Text 2. Coelho M, Menezes I: University social responsibility as a driving force of change: students’ perceptions beyond the ivory tower. On the Horizon. 2020; 28 (2): 93–100. Publisher Full Text 3. Kouatli I: The contemporary definition of university social responsibility with quantifiable sustainability. Social responsibility journal. 2019; 15 (7): 888–909. Publisher Full Text 4. Santos G, Marques CS, Justino E, et al. : Understanding social responsibility’s influence on service quality and student satisfaction in higher education. J. Clean Prod. 2020; 256 : 120597. Publisher Full Text 5. Vasilescu R, Barna C, Epure M, et al. : Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2 (2): 4177–4182. Publisher Full Text 6. Martí-Noguera JJ, Martí-Vilar M: Social responsibility in basic and higher education: An approach for Latin-America. Revista de Educação PUC-Campinas. 2015; 20 (1): 27–39. Publisher Full Text 7. Duque P, Cervantes-Cervantes LS: University Social Responsibility: a systematic review and a bibliometric análisis. Estudios Gerenciales. 2019; 35 (153): 451–464. Publisher Full Text 8. Wigmore-Álvarez A, Ruiz-Lozano M: University social responsibility (USR) in the global context: An overview of literature. Bus Prof Ethics J. 2012; 31 (3/4): 475–498. Publisher Full Text 9. Amiano Bonatxea I, Gutiérrez-Goiria J, Vazquez-De Francisco MJ, et al. : Is the global reporting initiative suitable to account for university social responsibility? Evidence from European institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2022; 23 (4): 831–847. Publisher Full Text 10. Plungpongpan J, Tiangsoongnern L, Speece M: University social responsibility and brand image of private universities in Bangkok. International journal of educational management. 2016; 30 (4). Publisher Full Text 11. Meseguer-Sánchez V, Abad-Segura E, Belmonte-Ureña LJ, et al. : Examining the research evolution on the socio-economic and environmental dimensions on university social responsibility. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020; 17 (13): 4729. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 12. Latif KF: The development and validation of stakeholder-based scale for measuring university social responsibility (USR). Soc. Indic. Res. 2018; 140 (2): 511–547. Publisher Full Text 13. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, et al. :How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021; 133 : 285–296. Publisher Full Text 14. Moed HF:New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp (Warsz). 2009; 57 : 13–18. Publisher Full Text 15. Gomez L: The importance of university social responsibility in Hispanic America: A responsible trend in developing countries. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: Emerging trends in developing economies. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014; pp. 241–268. 16. Garzon Jimenez R, Zorio-Grima A: Sustainability engagement in Latin America firms and cost of equity. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 2021; 34 (2): 224–243. Publisher Full Text 17. Estado|SELA [Internet]. http://s017.sela.org/celac/estados-miembros/ 18. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, et al. :Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J. Androl. 2016; 18 (2): 296–309. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 19. Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR:Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res. Synth. Methods. 2020; 11 (2): 181–217. 20. Urrunaga-Pastor D: Search strategy.figshare. Online resource. 2023. Publisher Full Text 21. Santos ME, Villatoro P: A multidimensional poverty index for Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth. 2018; 64 (1): 52–82. Publisher Full Text 22. Salmi J, D’Addio A: Policies for achieving inclusion in higher education. Policy Reviews in Higher Education. 2021; 5 (1): 47–72. Publisher Full Text 23. Bargain O, Aminjonov U: Poverty and covid-19 in africa and latin america. World Dev. 2021; 142 : 105422. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 24. Rababah A, Nikitina NI, Grebennikova VM, et al. : University social responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic: Universities’ case in the BRICS countries. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (13): 7035. Publisher Full Text 25. Lemos Lourenço M, Rosalia Ribeiro Silva M, Santana Galvão Oliveira R: University social responsibility and empathy in organizations during COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Social Responsibility Journal. 2022; 18 (4): 806–824. Publisher Full Text 26. Adel HM, Zeinhom GA, Younis RAA: From university social-responsibility to social-innovation strategy for quality accreditation and sustainable competitive advantage during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences. 2022; 4 (5): 410–437. Publisher Full Text 27. González JLL, Castro ARS, Mesa MLC, et al. : Scientific production in latin america and the caribbean in the period 1996-2019. Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar. 2020; 49 (3). 28. Carvajal-Tapia AE, Carvajal-Rodríguez E: Status of scientific production in Medicine in South America. 1996-2016. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina. 2018; 66 (4): 595–600. Publisher Full Text 29. Huamani C, González AG, Curioso WH, et al. : Scientific production in clinical medicine and international collaboration networks in South American countries. Rev Med Chil. 2012; 140 (4): 466–475. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 30. Hernández-Vásquez A, Bendezu-Quispe G, Comandé D, et al. : Worldwide original research production on maternal near-miss: A 10-year bibliometric study. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2020; 42 : 614–620. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 31. Maina-Ahlberg B, Nordberg E, Tomson G: North-South health research collaboration: challenges in institutional interaction. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44 (8): 1229–1238. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 32. Chandiwana S, Ornbjerg N: Review of North-South and South-South cooperation and conditions necessary to sustain research capability in developing countries. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2003; 288–297. 33. Duque P, Cervantes-Cervantes LS: University Social Responsibility: a systematic review and a bibliometric análisis. Estudios Gerenciales. 2019; 35 (153): 451–464. Publisher Full Text 34. Quienes Somos|URSULA.[cited 2023 Jul 15]. Reference Source 35. Casanueva-Yáñez G, Cantillo-Orozco AS, Maldonado-Córdova C, et al. : Social Responsibility Of Latin American Teachers Within The Framework Of Quality Education From The 2030 Agenda And The Sustainable Development Goals Of The United Nations. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2022; 6 (8): 2223–2235. 36. Urrunaga-Pastor D: Database. Dataset. figshare. 2023. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 16 Oct 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Grupo de Bibliometría, Evaluación de Evidencia y Revisiones Sistemáticas (BEERS), Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 2 Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 3 Centro de Investigación Epidemiológica en Salud Global, Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru Diego Urrunaga-Pastor Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Guido Bendezu-Quispe Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Deici Dávila-Altamirano Roles: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Milagritos N. Asmat Roles: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Jordi Grau-Monge Roles: Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 18 Jul 2024, 12:1340 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.2 version 1 Published: 16 Oct 2023, 12:1340 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.1 Copyright © 2024 Urrunaga-Pastor D et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Urrunaga-Pastor D, Bendezu-Quispe G, Dávila-Altamirano D et al. Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141987.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Jul 2024 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Martinez Usarralde MJ and Ponce Diaz N. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304719 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2#referee-response-304719 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 30 Jul 2024 Maria Jesus Martinez Usarralde , Department of Comparative Education and History of Education, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Nicolás Ponce Diaz , Facultad de Educación, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Antofagasta Region, Chile Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304719 The revisions are ... Continue reading READ ALL The revisions are appropriate for me. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Comparative Education. International Education. Teaching Education. Service Learning. We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Martinez Usarralde MJ and Ponce Diaz N. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304719 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2#referee-response-304719 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Perez-Gutierrez M. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304720 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2#referee-response-304720 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 26 Jul 2024 Mikel Perez-Gutierrez , Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304720 The quality of the article was improved, clarifying the methodology, results, discussion and conclusions sections. Minor errors were detected. In Table 2, Brazil is not top regarding average citations per article (Spain obtained 8.4) so the sentence ... Continue reading READ ALL The quality of the article was improved, clarifying the methodology, results, discussion and conclusions sections. Minor errors were detected. In Table 2, Brazil is not top regarding average citations per article (Spain obtained 8.4) so the sentence should be amended. In the conclusions section, URS was used instead of USR. This error should be amended. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Bibliometrics, Sport Sciences, Physical Education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Perez-Gutierrez M. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304720 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2#referee-response-304720 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 16 Oct 2023 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Perez-Gutierrez M. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r225262 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v1#referee-response-225262 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 14 Feb 2024 Mikel Perez-Gutierrez , Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r225262 The manuscript carried out a bibliometric analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus focused on University Social Responsibility by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The manuscript offers an overview of the main bibliometric indicators for characterising this scientific output. ... Continue reading READ ALL The manuscript carried out a bibliometric analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus focused on University Social Responsibility by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The manuscript offers an overview of the main bibliometric indicators for characterising this scientific output. However, some deficiencies should be amended for improving the quality and reproducibility of the research (methodology section) as well as the understanding of the obtained results (results, discussion and conclusions sections). These suggestions are the following: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbe". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/ or https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os), Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analysed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. (Gusenbauer et al) 1 Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How this temporal evolution is presented in Figure 4? Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this filed of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly References 1. Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR: Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods . 2020; 11 (2): 181-217 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Bibliometrics, Sport Sciences, Physical Education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Perez-Gutierrez M. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r225262 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v1#referee-response-225262 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor , Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 18 Jul 2024 Author Response Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbean". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: [http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/](http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/) or [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os](https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os). Response: We appreciate your comment. All the document sections were reviewed and improved. Since the provided reference by the reviewer was not available, the Latin America & Caribbean countries list by United Nations was used. Comment 2: Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analyzed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. Response: We appreciate your comment. We cited documents in the methods to justify the database used (Scopus). Comment 3: Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Response: We appreciate your comment. Regarding the clarification of all bibliometric indicators, there are stated in the methods: “Additionally, useful indicators for bibliometric evaluation, such as the authorship rate (ratio between the total number of articles and the total number of authors), co-authorship rate (average number of co-authors per article), and collaboration rate (ratio between the total number of authors of articles with multiple authors and the total number of articles with multiple authors) were described.” The information about the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 was added to the methods. Comment 4: Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How is this temporal evolution presented in Figure 4? Response: We appreciate your comment. In methods, information was added to clarify. Additionally, the figure 2 was reuploaded since in the reviewed manuscript, it seems that the legend (colors according to the timeline in years) was not presented. Comment 5: Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Response: We appreciate your comment. This information was confusing. We improve the redaction. Comment 6: Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 7: Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Response: We appreciate your comment. Table 1 was updated with the suggestions. Comment 8: Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section, the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 9: Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Response: We appreciate your comment. The table was updated with the suggestion. Comment 10: Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Response: We appreciate your comment. We added the recommended document in the discussion of the results. Comment 11: Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Response: We appreciate your comment. The sentence was amended. Comment 12: Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this field of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Response: We appreciate your comment. The conclusion was improved Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbean". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: [http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/](http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/) or [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os](https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os). Response: We appreciate your comment. All the document sections were reviewed and improved. Since the provided reference by the reviewer was not available, the Latin America & Caribbean countries list by United Nations was used. Comment 2: Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analyzed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. Response: We appreciate your comment. We cited documents in the methods to justify the database used (Scopus). Comment 3: Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Response: We appreciate your comment. Regarding the clarification of all bibliometric indicators, there are stated in the methods: “Additionally, useful indicators for bibliometric evaluation, such as the authorship rate (ratio between the total number of articles and the total number of authors), co-authorship rate (average number of co-authors per article), and collaboration rate (ratio between the total number of authors of articles with multiple authors and the total number of articles with multiple authors) were described.” The information about the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 was added to the methods. Comment 4: Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How is this temporal evolution presented in Figure 4? Response: We appreciate your comment. In methods, information was added to clarify. Additionally, the figure 2 was reuploaded since in the reviewed manuscript, it seems that the legend (colors according to the timeline in years) was not presented. Comment 5: Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Response: We appreciate your comment. This information was confusing. We improve the redaction. Comment 6: Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 7: Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Response: We appreciate your comment. Table 1 was updated with the suggestions. Comment 8: Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section, the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 9: Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Response: We appreciate your comment. The table was updated with the suggestion. Comment 10: Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Response: We appreciate your comment. We added the recommended document in the discussion of the results. Comment 11: Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Response: We appreciate your comment. The sentence was amended. Comment 12: Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this field of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Response: We appreciate your comment. The conclusion was improved Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor , Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 18 Jul 2024 Author Response Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbean". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: [http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/](http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/) or [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os](https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os). Response: We appreciate your comment. All the document sections were reviewed and improved. Since the provided reference by the reviewer was not available, the Latin America & Caribbean countries list by United Nations was used. Comment 2: Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analyzed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. Response: We appreciate your comment. We cited documents in the methods to justify the database used (Scopus). Comment 3: Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Response: We appreciate your comment. Regarding the clarification of all bibliometric indicators, there are stated in the methods: “Additionally, useful indicators for bibliometric evaluation, such as the authorship rate (ratio between the total number of articles and the total number of authors), co-authorship rate (average number of co-authors per article), and collaboration rate (ratio between the total number of authors of articles with multiple authors and the total number of articles with multiple authors) were described.” The information about the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 was added to the methods. Comment 4: Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How is this temporal evolution presented in Figure 4? Response: We appreciate your comment. In methods, information was added to clarify. Additionally, the figure 2 was reuploaded since in the reviewed manuscript, it seems that the legend (colors according to the timeline in years) was not presented. Comment 5: Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Response: We appreciate your comment. This information was confusing. We improve the redaction. Comment 6: Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 7: Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Response: We appreciate your comment. Table 1 was updated with the suggestions. Comment 8: Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section, the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 9: Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Response: We appreciate your comment. The table was updated with the suggestion. Comment 10: Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Response: We appreciate your comment. We added the recommended document in the discussion of the results. Comment 11: Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Response: We appreciate your comment. The sentence was amended. Comment 12: Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this field of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Response: We appreciate your comment. The conclusion was improved Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbean". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: [http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/](http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/) or [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os](https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os). Response: We appreciate your comment. All the document sections were reviewed and improved. Since the provided reference by the reviewer was not available, the Latin America & Caribbean countries list by United Nations was used. Comment 2: Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analyzed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. Response: We appreciate your comment. We cited documents in the methods to justify the database used (Scopus). Comment 3: Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Response: We appreciate your comment. Regarding the clarification of all bibliometric indicators, there are stated in the methods: “Additionally, useful indicators for bibliometric evaluation, such as the authorship rate (ratio between the total number of articles and the total number of authors), co-authorship rate (average number of co-authors per article), and collaboration rate (ratio between the total number of authors of articles with multiple authors and the total number of articles with multiple authors) were described.” The information about the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 was added to the methods. Comment 4: Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How is this temporal evolution presented in Figure 4? Response: We appreciate your comment. In methods, information was added to clarify. Additionally, the figure 2 was reuploaded since in the reviewed manuscript, it seems that the legend (colors according to the timeline in years) was not presented. Comment 5: Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Response: We appreciate your comment. This information was confusing. We improve the redaction. Comment 6: Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 7: Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Response: We appreciate your comment. Table 1 was updated with the suggestions. Comment 8: Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section, the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 9: Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Response: We appreciate your comment. The table was updated with the suggestion. Comment 10: Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Response: We appreciate your comment. We added the recommended document in the discussion of the results. Comment 11: Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Response: We appreciate your comment. The sentence was amended. Comment 12: Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this field of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Response: We appreciate your comment. The conclusion was improved Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Martinez Usarralde MJ and Ponce Diaz N. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r217335 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v1#referee-response-217335 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 13 Nov 2023 Maria Jesus Martinez Usarralde , Department of Comparative Education and History of Education, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Nicolás Ponce Diaz , Facultad de Educación, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Antofagasta Region, Chile Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r217335 The article needs some improvement: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the ... Continue reading READ ALL The article needs some improvement: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. "There are no significant differences between high and low income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? No Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Comparative Education. International Education. Teaching Education. Service Learning. We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Martinez Usarralde MJ and Ponce Diaz N. Reviewer Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r217335 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v1#referee-response-217335 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor , Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 18 Jul 2024 Author Response Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction ... Continue reading Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. Response: We appreciate your comment. Relevant Information was added to the manuscript regarding bibliometric analysis. Comment 2: In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. Response: We appreciate your comment. The document states, “The search was not restricted by year or language of publication.” No change was conducted. Comment 3: "There are no significant differences between high- and low-income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Response: We appreciate your comment. The redaction was improved. The writing was improved according to the comment. Comment 4: Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. Regarding the co-occurrence overlay visualization, the attribute average publication year of the document in which a keyword or a term occurs was used in the document. As it is described in the VOSViewer manual about this attribute, “The average publication year of the documents in which a keyword or a term occurs or the average publication year of the documents published by a source, an author, an organization, or a country.” Hence, the interpretation of this visualization is appropriate for discussion. Information was added in methods to clarify. Comment 5: "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Response: We appreciate your comment. The expression “associated with” was replaced with “from” to be more precise as it is stated in the reviewer comment. Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. Response: We appreciate your comment. Relevant Information was added to the manuscript regarding bibliometric analysis. Comment 2: In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. Response: We appreciate your comment. The document states, “The search was not restricted by year or language of publication.” No change was conducted. Comment 3: "There are no significant differences between high- and low-income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Response: We appreciate your comment. The redaction was improved. The writing was improved according to the comment. Comment 4: Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. Regarding the co-occurrence overlay visualization, the attribute average publication year of the document in which a keyword or a term occurs was used in the document. As it is described in the VOSViewer manual about this attribute, “The average publication year of the documents in which a keyword or a term occurs or the average publication year of the documents published by a source, an author, an organization, or a country.” Hence, the interpretation of this visualization is appropriate for discussion. Information was added in methods to clarify. Comment 5: "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Response: We appreciate your comment. The expression “associated with” was replaced with “from” to be more precise as it is stated in the reviewer comment. Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor , Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru 18 Jul 2024 Author Response Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction ... Continue reading Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. Response: We appreciate your comment. Relevant Information was added to the manuscript regarding bibliometric analysis. Comment 2: In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. Response: We appreciate your comment. The document states, “The search was not restricted by year or language of publication.” No change was conducted. Comment 3: "There are no significant differences between high- and low-income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Response: We appreciate your comment. The redaction was improved. The writing was improved according to the comment. Comment 4: Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. Regarding the co-occurrence overlay visualization, the attribute average publication year of the document in which a keyword or a term occurs was used in the document. As it is described in the VOSViewer manual about this attribute, “The average publication year of the documents in which a keyword or a term occurs or the average publication year of the documents published by a source, an author, an organization, or a country.” Hence, the interpretation of this visualization is appropriate for discussion. Information was added in methods to clarify. Comment 5: "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Response: We appreciate your comment. The expression “associated with” was replaced with “from” to be more precise as it is stated in the reviewer comment. Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. Response: We appreciate your comment. Relevant Information was added to the manuscript regarding bibliometric analysis. Comment 2: In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. Response: We appreciate your comment. The document states, “The search was not restricted by year or language of publication.” No change was conducted. Comment 3: "There are no significant differences between high- and low-income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Response: We appreciate your comment. The redaction was improved. The writing was improved according to the comment. Comment 4: Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. Regarding the co-occurrence overlay visualization, the attribute average publication year of the document in which a keyword or a term occurs was used in the document. As it is described in the VOSViewer manual about this attribute, “The average publication year of the documents in which a keyword or a term occurs or the average publication year of the documents published by a source, an author, an organization, or a country.” Hence, the interpretation of this visualization is appropriate for discussion. Information was added in methods to clarify. Comment 5: "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Response: We appreciate your comment. The expression “associated with” was replaced with “from” to be more precise as it is stated in the reviewer comment. Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 16 Oct 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 2 (revision) 18 Jul 24 read read Version 1 16 Oct 23 read read Maria Jesus Martinez Usarralde , University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Nicolás Ponce Diaz , University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile Mikel Perez-Gutierrez , Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Martinez Usarralde M et al. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 30 Jul 2024 | for Version 2 Maria Jesus Martinez Usarralde , Department of Comparative Education and History of Education, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Nicolás Ponce Diaz , Facultad de Educación, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Antofagasta Region, Chile 0 Views copyright © 2024 Martinez Usarralde M et al. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The revisions are appropriate for me. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Comparative Education. International Education. Teaching Education. Service Learning. We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Martinez Usarralde MJ and Ponce Diaz N. Peer Review Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304719) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2#referee-response-304719 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Perez-Gutierrez M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 26 Jul 2024 | for Version 2 Mikel Perez-Gutierrez , Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain 0 Views copyright © 2024 Perez-Gutierrez M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The quality of the article was improved, clarifying the methodology, results, discussion and conclusions sections. Minor errors were detected. In Table 2, Brazil is not top regarding average citations per article (Spain obtained 8.4) so the sentence should be amended. In the conclusions section, URS was used instead of USR. This error should be amended. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Bibliometrics, Sport Sciences, Physical Education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Perez-Gutierrez M. Peer Review Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168804.r304720) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2#referee-response-304720 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Perez-Gutierrez M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 14 Feb 2024 | for Version 1 Mikel Perez-Gutierrez , Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain 0 Views copyright © 2024 Perez-Gutierrez M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The manuscript carried out a bibliometric analysis of the scientific production indexed in Scopus focused on University Social Responsibility by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The manuscript offers an overview of the main bibliometric indicators for characterising this scientific output. However, some deficiencies should be amended for improving the quality and reproducibility of the research (methodology section) as well as the understanding of the obtained results (results, discussion and conclusions sections). These suggestions are the following: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbe". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/ or https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os), Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analysed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. (Gusenbauer et al) 1 Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How this temporal evolution is presented in Figure 4? Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this filed of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly References 1. Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR: Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods . 2020; 11 (2): 181-217 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Bibliometrics, Sport Sciences, Physical Education I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor, Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru Dear Reviewer, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: Page 3: For improving the understanding of the manuscript and its object of study, Latin America and the Caribbean countries should be defined and justified. For that purpose, CELAC (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños) could be used for defining the countries considered under the term "Latin America and the Caribbean". For citation, these pages should be consulted and cited: [http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/](http://s017.sela.org/celac/quienes-somos/que-es-la-celac/) or [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os](https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comunidad_de_Estados_Latinoamericanos_y_Caribe%C3%B1os). Response: We appreciate your comment. All the document sections were reviewed and improved. Since the provided reference by the reviewer was not available, the Latin America & Caribbean countries list by United Nations was used. Comment 2: Page 3: A justification of the database chosen for data retrieval should be included. The work carried out by Gusenbauer and Haddaway (2020) analyzed the coverage and breadth of several databases, concluding Scopus is a principal database and justifying its use in the present manuscript. Response: We appreciate your comment. We cited documents in the methods to justify the database used (Scopus). Comment 3: Page 3: All bibliometric indicators included in the results section should be explained. Total citations and the average citations per article by each country are included in Table 2. Table 3 presents the number of articles published in the most important journals. These indicators should be mentioned here. Response: We appreciate your comment. Regarding the clarification of all bibliometric indicators, there are stated in the methods: “Additionally, useful indicators for bibliometric evaluation, such as the authorship rate (ratio between the total number of articles and the total number of authors), co-authorship rate (average number of co-authors per article), and collaboration rate (ratio between the total number of authors of articles with multiple authors and the total number of articles with multiple authors) were described.” The information about the results presented in Tables 2 and 3 was added to the methods. Comment 4: Page 3: According to the results presented in Figure 4, an explanation about the analysis applied for the temporal evolution of the term co-occurrence and the presentation of results (temporal evolution by means of colours?) should be included. How is this temporal evolution presented in Figure 4? Response: We appreciate your comment. In methods, information was added to clarify. Additionally, the figure 2 was reuploaded since in the reviewed manuscript, it seems that the legend (colors according to the timeline in years) was not presented. Comment 5: Page 4: The difference between "author" and "mention" should be explained in the methodology section. Are "mentions" referring to "signatures"? Response: We appreciate your comment. This information was confusing. We improve the redaction. Comment 6: Page 4: Regarding the obtained results presented in Table 2, the highest average of citations per article was obtained by Lebanon. If authors are referring to the Latin America and Caribbean countries with the highest average citations per article, Colombia achieved the highest (8.4), followed by Chile (5.4) and Brazil (4.1). The sentence should be amended for clarifying this information. Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 7: Page 5: The title of Table 1 (Authors with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three authors with one paper, but there are more authors with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, authors with 2 or more papers should be only included in Table 1. Thus, the title of Table 1 should be the following: "Authors with two or more articles indexed in Scopus..." Response: We appreciate your comment. Table 1 was updated with the suggestions. Comment 8: Page 5: Table 2 should also include the amount of papers by country for comparing their productivity. Moreover, in the results section, the percentage of publications per country is described (Brazil 26.4%, Chile 17% and Colombia 13.2%). Response: We appreciate your comment. This table was improved, and the information reported about this table. Comment 9: Page 6: As it was mentioned in Table 1, the title of Table 3 (Journals with the highest scientific production) is not representing the results included since there are three journals with one paper, but it seems there are more journals with only one paper. The title of the table and the results included should be amended. Firstly, journals with 3 or more papers should be only included in Table 3. Thus, the title of Table 3 should be the following: "Journals with three or more publications..." Response: We appreciate your comment. The table was updated with the suggestion. Comment 10: Page 7: The results obtained in the present manuscript should be compared with those obtained by Duque and Cervantes-Cervantes (2019) since their topic is the same. Specifically, results could be compared according to total number of articles focused on University Social Responsibility, distribution of articles by country, distribution of articles by year, most productive authors and most important journals for disseminating USR scientific output. This comparison is relevant for determining the contribution of Latin America and Caribbean countries, institutions or authors to the worldwide scientific output in this topic. Response: We appreciate your comment. We added the recommended document in the discussion of the results. Comment 11: Page 8: "To the best of our knowledge, this bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production on USR associated with institutions in Latin America". According to the bibliometric analysis developed, the present manuscript is evaluating the scientific production on USR published by Latin America and Caribbean institutions. The sentence should be amended. Response: We appreciate your comment. The sentence was amended. Comment 12: Page 8: The conclusion section should be strengthened. An explanation about the causes and consequences of this analysis should be included. Some questions to answer are: What is the relevance of Latin America and Caribbean institutions regarding USR scientific output? Who is the most important author/country? Is collaboration among authors, institutions or countries essential for developing research on USR? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this field of knowledge? What knowledge gaps need to be filled? To which countries should investment in research be directed? Response: We appreciate your comment. The conclusion was improved View more View less Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. reply Respond Report a concern Perez-Gutierrez M. Peer Review Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r225262) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v1#referee-response-225262 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2023 Martinez Usarralde M et al. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 13 Nov 2023 | for Version 1 Maria Jesus Martinez Usarralde , Department of Comparative Education and History of Education, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Nicolás Ponce Diaz , Facultad de Educación, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Antofagasta Region, Chile 0 Views copyright © 2023 Martinez Usarralde M et al. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article needs some improvement: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. "There are no significant differences between high and low income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Partly Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? No Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Comparative Education. International Education. Teaching Education. Service Learning. We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however we have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 18 Jul 2024 Diego Urrunaga-Pastor, Unidad de Responsabilidad Social Universitaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru Dear Reviewers, We appreciate your review of our manuscript and the comments you provided. Below, we have addressed each of your observations in detail: Comment 1: The introduction is excessively brief, as is the conclusion. Response: We appreciate your comment. Relevant Information was added to the manuscript regarding bibliometric analysis. Comment 2: In the "search strategy" section, they point out that they have restricted language and year, but the Vosviewer programme only codes articles in English. Response: We appreciate your comment. The document states, “The search was not restricted by year or language of publication.” No change was conducted. Comment 3: "There are no significant differences between high- and low-income countries". This is not being evidenced and is based on a study that has nothing to do with the research field. Response: We appreciate your comment. The redaction was improved. The writing was improved according to the comment. Comment 4: Paragraph on co-occurrence: the desire expressed by the authors cannot be derived from a co-occurrence analysis. Response: Thank you for the recommendation. Regarding the co-occurrence overlay visualization, the attribute average publication year of the document in which a keyword or a term occurs was used in the document. As it is described in the VOSViewer manual about this attribute, “The average publication year of the documents in which a keyword or a term occurs or the average publication year of the documents published by a source, an author, an organization, or a country.” Hence, the interpretation of this visualization is appropriate for discussion. Information was added in methods to clarify. Comment 5: "The bibliometric analysis is the first to evaluate the scientific production of USR associated with Latin American institutions": the analysis referred to in the article is not observed in this article, in the sense that the data do not reflect the scientific production of USR in Latin American institutions. Response: We appreciate your comment. The expression “associated with” was replaced with “from” to be more precise as it is stated in the reviewer comment. View more View less Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. reply Respond Report a concern Martinez Usarralde MJ and Ponce Diaz N. Peer Review Report For: Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university social responsibility in Latin America and the Caribbean [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1340 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.155478.r217335) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v1#referee-response-217335 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Bibliometric analysis of scientific production...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Urrunaga-Pastor D et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340", templates : { twitter : "Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on university.... Urrunaga-Pastor D et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1340/v2" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/141987/168804") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "168804"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "304719": 9, "306836": 0, "306837": 0, "306838": 0, "306839": 0, "304720": 16, "306833": 0, "306834": 0, "306835": 0, "224730": 0, "224729": 0, "306840": 0, "306841": 0, "306842": 0, "225263": 0, "239855": 0, "221359": 0, "221358": 0, "225262": 30, "239853": 0, "221357": 0, "221356": 0, "239859": 0, "239863": 0, "217335": 31, "239862": 0, "222710": 0, "239861": 0, "239860": 0, "217339": 0, "217338": 0, "217337": 0, "239865": 0, "217336": 0, "239864": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "bd24dbf5-8b1b-43d3-b0b6-6965be0c75b6"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });