Altered therapeutic capacities of olfactory ensheathing cells caused by a lesion in an autologous transplantation model for the treatment of spinal cord injury

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes irreversible loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions and currently has no cure. Beyond local damage, SCI induces systemic inflammation, including cerebral inflammation that impairs neurogenesis. While cell therapies show promising effects in animal models, such as scar reduction and neuroprotection, their benefits in humans remain limited. One key difference lies in the transplantation strategy: animals receive healthy donor cells, whereas humans require autologous transplants. This led us to investigate how the lesion context affects the neuro-reparative potential of olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) harvested from olfactory bulbs. To this end, we cultured OECs from healthy animals and from animals that had undergone SCI one week earlier. We then transplanted both types of OECs into recipient animals after SCI for therapeutic purposes. Using functional sensory-motor studies, histological and gene expression analyses, we were able to demonstrate for the first time that the lesion negatively affects the therapeutic properties of cells used to treat SCI. Indeed, transplantation of cells from previously injured animals does not modulate the fibrotic and glial scar, or the demyelinated areas at the lesion site, and therefore fails to improve functional recovery; unlike cells derived from healthy donors. Moreover, our in vitro studies show that cells derived from SCI animals secrete pro-inflammatory molecules that promote the polarization of microglia toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Altogether, these innovative findings provide new insights into the potential of cell transplantation in the context of autologous therapy after SCI. Graphical abstract
Full text 1,785 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes irreversible loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions and currently has no cure. Beyond local damage, SCI induces systemic inflammation, including cerebral inflammation that impairs neurogenesis. While cell therapies show promising effects in animal models, such as scar reduction and neuroprotection, their benefits in humans remain limited. One key difference lies in the transplantation strategy: animals receive healthy donor cells, whereas humans require autologous transplants. This led us to investigate how the lesion context affects the neuro-reparative potential of olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) harvested from olfactory bulbs. To this end, we cultured OECs from healthy animals and from animals that had undergone SCI one week earlier. We then transplanted both types of OECs into recipient animals after SCI for therapeutic purposes. Using functional sensory-motor studies, histological and gene expression analyses, we were able to demonstrate for the first time that the lesion negatively affects the therapeutic properties of cells used to treat SCI. Indeed, transplantation of cells from previously injured animals does not modulate the fibrotic and glial scar, or the demyelinated areas at the lesion site, and therefore fails to improve functional recovery; unlike cells derived from healthy donors. Moreover, our in vitro studies show that cells derived from SCI animals secrete pro-inflammatory molecules that promote the polarization of microglia toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Altogether, these innovative findings provide new insights into the potential of cell transplantation in the context of autologous therapy after SCI. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00