Attitudes to the prescription of menopause hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms and osteoporosis for patients of different ages: A survey of gynecologists in Belgium
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
A survey of Belgian gynecologists revealed differing attitudes towards prescribing hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms and osteoporosis depending on patient age.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
IntroductionThe interpretation of the literature on menopause hormone therapy (MHT) has evolved enormously over the last decade. In recent years, guidelines have reinstated the place of MHT.AimThis survey analyzes the prescription (initiation and maintenance) of MHT in relation to patient age and therapy indications.Material and methodTwo vignettes were sent to gynecologists working in Belgium in a random survey. One vignette concerned the initiation of therapy for a woman who was either 52 or 62 years old, suffering either from severe vasomotor symptoms (VSM) or from osteoporosis. The second vignette concerned the maintenance of MHT or switching to another medication in a woman aged 62 years who suffered either from VSM (when stopping MHT) or from osteoporosis. The physicians were asked how they would treat these two patients.ResultsWe analyzed 443 vignettes from 222 physicians.Initiation of mht84% of the respondents would initiate MHT for a 52-year-old woman with VMS, whereas only 32% would do so for a 52-year-old woman who had osteoporosis (chi square = 33; p < 0.001). 51% would initiate MHT for a 62-year-old woman with VMS, whereas only 14% would do so for a 62-year-old woman with osteoporosis (chi square = 17; p < 0.001).Maintenance of therapy87% would maintain MHT for a 62-year-old woman with severe VMS and 52% would do so for a 62-year-old woman with osteoporosis (Chi Square 31; p < 0.001).ConclusionVMS are recognized as an indication for MHT, but osteoporosis much less so, even for women around the age of 50.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (17)
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002978.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31816d815e via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000320 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.08.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8063 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejmp1514242 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.033 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000383 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1129166 via openalex
- W6628983913 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000921 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000441353.20693.78 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/nrendo.2013.17 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jc.2015-2236 via openalex
- doi:10.1017/s0033291718000168 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001237 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:12:37.668444+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK