Conformational dynamics of the active state of β-arrestin 1

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,838 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT β-arrestins (βarr) regulate the signaling and trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in numerous physiological processes and have been implicated in various diseases. Structural and kinetic insights into how ligand-mediated GPCR activation drives βarr coupling and activation remain limited, with the binding mechanism of the phosphorylated GPCR C-terminal tails, such as that of the vasopressin receptor-2 (V2Rpp), and the conformation of the entire βarr tail in the active state still unknown. Here, we simulated both the basal and V2Rpp-bound states of βarr1 with temperature replica-exchange molecular dynamics (TREMD) simulations to probe the activation mechanism of βarr1. Compared to conventional MD, our TREMD simulations, employing an unprecedented 200-replica setup, significantly broadened conformational sampling while preserving the basal state. Our analysis showed that, without the bound Fab30 antibody fragment, the main body of V2Rpp-bound βarr1 tended to transition toward the basal conformation; however, binding of V2Rpp in the N-domain groove allosterically oriented the finger loop to point upward for core engagement with a GPCR. Furthermore, V2Rpp dissociation events suggest that its binding involves a sliding movement along the N-domain groove, during which its phosphorylated residues p3 and p4 transiently occupy the S5 site to facilitate repositioning of p5 into the S5 site, thereby triggering a zippering process of p1 to p3. The dynamic 62-residue βarr1 tail explored a vast conformational space, forming transient secondary structures, and could favorably anchor on the main body’s back side and within the central crest crevice. These findings elucidate key mechanistic steps underlying βarr1 activation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00