Speed-dependent modulation of tactile edge orientation discrimination

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study found that tactile edge orientation discrimination is improved at slower-than-average speeds and worsened at higher-than-average speeds, with performance changes correlated with speed deviation from natural exploration speed.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Previous studies investigating edge-orientation discrimination capacity either stimulated an immobilized finger at limited speeds, or did not manipulate movement speed during active exploration. Here we tested the effect of movement speed on edge-orientation discrimination, including very slow and fast speeds. Participants were instructed to move their finger across two pairs of edges while matching their speed to a visual cue. One edge pair was parallel and the other non parallel to varying degrees. Participants were asked to identify the non parallel pair of edges. We report three main findings. First, consistent with previous reports, when they were free to choose their movement speed, participants moved at an average speed of ∼29 mm/s (range: 15-52 mm/s). Second, there was no correlation between a participant’s natural speed and their edge orientation discrimination capacity. Third, participants got better at edge orientation discrimination at slower than average speeds (5mm/s), and worse at higher than average speeds (90 and 180 mm/s). This change in performance was correlated with their relative change in movement speed. New and Noteworthy Here we demonstrate speed-dependent variation in edge-orientation discrimination during active tactile exploration, with improved performance at very slow speeds. Changes in discrimination capacity as a function of speed are correlated with deviations from a participant’s natural speed.
Full text 1,716 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Previous studies investigating edge-orientation discrimination capacity either stimulated an immobilized finger at limited speeds, or did not manipulate movement speed during active exploration. Here we tested the effect of movement speed on edge-orientation discrimination, including very slow and fast speeds. Participants were instructed to move their finger across two pairs of edges while matching their speed to a visual cue. One edge pair was parallel and the other non parallel to varying degrees. Participants were asked to identify the non parallel pair of edges. We report three main findings. First, consistent with previous reports, when they were free to choose their movement speed, participants moved at an average speed of ∼29 mm/s (range: 15-52 mm/s). Second, there was no correlation between a participant’s natural speed and their edge orientation discrimination capacity. Third, participants got better at edge orientation discrimination at slower than average speeds (5mm/s), and worse at higher than average speeds (90 and 180 mm/s). This change in performance was correlated with their relative change in movement speed. New and Noteworthy Here we demonstrate speed-dependent variation in edge-orientation discrimination during active tactile exploration, with improved performance at very slow speeds. Changes in discrimination capacity as a function of speed are correlated with deviations from a participant’s natural speed. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Data and materials availability All raw data generated in this study can be made available upon request. Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00