Identification of outcome predictors in transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression through explainable data-driven analysis

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Accurate and interpretable prediction of treatment outcomes is critical for advancing personalized interventions in major depressive disorder (MDD), particularly in the context of neuromodulatory therapies such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Traditional approaches often lack precision and offer limited insight into the clinical profiles associated with treatment response. This study aims to identify key demographic and clinical predictors of tDCS efficacy in patients with depression, using interpretable, data-driven modeling. We analyzed a multi-center dataset comprising 169 patients with depression who underwent tDCS treatment. A supervised learning framework was employed to model treatment response, integrating explainable artificial intelligence techniques to enhance clinical interpretability. Predictive features included age, gender, baseline symptom severity, tDCS protocol, diagnostic subtype, comorbidities, illness duration, and concurrent medications. The model achieved a predictive accuracy of approximately 58% in classifying treatment responders and non-responders. Explainability analyses revealed that the most influential factors included age range (40–49 years), gender (female), medication status (drug-naive), and chronicity of illness (duration > 16 years). These characteristics defined the subgroup most likely to benefit from tDCS intervention. Our findings demonstrate the potential of explainable machine learning to support outcome prediction in tDCS therapy for depression. By highlighting clinically meaningful predictors and patient profiles, this approach may facilitate more personalized and effective treatment strategies in psychiatric care.
Full text 12,821 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Identification of outcome predictors in transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression through explainable data-driven analysis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Identification of outcome predictors in transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression through explainable data-driven analysis Sayna Rotbei, Giordano D’Urso, Marco Bortolomasi, Bernardo Dell’Osso, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6740366/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Accurate and interpretable prediction of treatment outcomes is critical for advancing personalized interventions in major depressive disorder (MDD), particularly in the context of neuromodulatory therapies such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Traditional approaches often lack precision and offer limited insight into the clinical profiles associated with treatment response. This study aims to identify key demographic and clinical predictors of tDCS efficacy in patients with depression, using interpretable, data-driven modeling. We analyzed a multi-center dataset comprising 169 patients with depression who underwent tDCS treatment. A supervised learning framework was employed to model treatment response, integrating explainable artificial intelligence techniques to enhance clinical interpretability. Predictive features included age, gender, baseline symptom severity, tDCS protocol, diagnostic subtype, comorbidities, illness duration, and concurrent medications. The model achieved a predictive accuracy of approximately 58% in classifying treatment responders and non-responders. Explainability analyses revealed that the most influential factors included age range (40–49 years), gender (female), medication status (drug-naive), and chronicity of illness (duration > 16 years). These characteristics defined the subgroup most likely to benefit from tDCS intervention. Our findings demonstrate the potential of explainable machine learning to support outcome prediction in tDCS therapy for depression. By highlighting clinically meaningful predictors and patient profiles, this approach may facilitate more personalized and effective treatment strategies in psychiatric care. Biological sciences/Biotechnology Biological sciences/Computational biology and bioinformatics Biological sciences/Psychology Health sciences/Health care Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6740366","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":469182749,"identity":"e944a93c-5491-4426-b094-04c55e00d452","order_by":0,"name":"Sayna Rotbei","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Naples Federico II","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sayna","middleName":"","lastName":"Rotbei","suffix":""},{"id":469182750,"identity":"4d466911-03aa-4073-8b18-f1d8ccbdbde5","order_by":1,"name":"Giordano D’Urso","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Naples Federico II","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giordano","middleName":"","lastName":"D’Urso","suffix":""},{"id":469182751,"identity":"bb81c659-7e8b-4c2b-8a27-225c35da51c0","order_by":2,"name":"Marco Bortolomasi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Villa Santa Chiara Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marco","middleName":"","lastName":"Bortolomasi","suffix":""},{"id":469182752,"identity":"00eeec7f-a7ae-4715-a0ef-a4aeeb714801","order_by":3,"name":"Bernardo Dell’Osso","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Milan","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bernardo","middleName":"","lastName":"Dell’Osso","suffix":""},{"id":469182753,"identity":"2ad75c19-7fad-4c0a-ba7b-2a117da32fad","order_by":4,"name":"Roberta Ferrucci","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universita degli Studi di Milano-Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Roberta","middleName":"","lastName":"Ferrucci","suffix":""},{"id":469182754,"identity":"1c91e22b-5c2e-4f9c-ab88-bd97cd39dc9a","order_by":5,"name":"Alberto Priori","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alberto","middleName":"","lastName":"Priori","suffix":""},{"id":469182755,"identity":"c5b96803-0721-491a-a9ff-228afbdd7708","order_by":6,"name":"Alessio Botta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Naples Federico II","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alessio","middleName":"","lastName":"Botta","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-24 17:38:20","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6740366/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6740366/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":108379768,"identity":"9eccc0e4-a8ba-4453-81cb-f543b0a247a6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-04 04:25:27","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":374276,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"tDCSpaperv3.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6740366/v1_covered_2957dcb6-53af-44c6-a68d-6250a4edf33f.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Identification of outcome predictors in transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression through explainable data-driven analysis","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6740366/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6740366/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAccurate and interpretable prediction of treatment outcomes is critical for advancing personalized interventions in major depressive disorder (MDD), particularly in the context of neuromodulatory therapies such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Traditional approaches often lack precision and offer limited insight into the clinical profiles associated with treatment response. This study aims to identify key demographic and clinical predictors of tDCS efficacy in patients with depression, using interpretable, data-driven modeling.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe analyzed a multi-center dataset comprising 169 patients with depression who underwent tDCS treatment. A supervised learning framework was employed to model treatment response, integrating explainable artificial intelligence techniques to enhance clinical interpretability. Predictive features included age, gender, baseline symptom severity, tDCS protocol, diagnostic subtype, comorbidities, illness duration, and concurrent medications. The model achieved a predictive accuracy of approximately 58% in classifying treatment responders and non-responders. Explainability analyses revealed that the most influential factors included age range (40–49 years), gender (female), medication status (drug-naive), and chronicity of illness (duration \u0026gt; 16 years). These characteristics defined the subgroup most likely to benefit from tDCS intervention.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur findings demonstrate the potential of explainable machine learning to support outcome prediction in tDCS therapy for depression. By highlighting clinically meaningful predictors and patient profiles, this approach may facilitate more personalized and effective treatment strategies in psychiatric care.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Identification of outcome predictors in transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression through explainable data-driven analysis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-12 06:31:54","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6740366/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"89f6d257-c8e6-4959-942f-72def50bf2d8","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 12th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":49813508,"name":"Biological sciences/Biotechnology"},{"id":49813509,"name":"Biological sciences/Computational biology and bioinformatics"},{"id":49813510,"name":"Biological sciences/Psychology"},{"id":49813511,"name":"Health sciences/Health care"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-04T04:24:55+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-06-12 06:31:54","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6740366","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6740366","identity":"rs-6740366","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00