Étude prospective comparative entre les techniques de césarienne de Joël-Cohen et de Mouchel
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the Joel-Cohen method for cesarean section to the traditional transrectal incision.MethodFifty-two patients requiring a caesarean section were enrolled in this prospective study. Overall morbidity and post-operative pain was assessed. Four surgeons participated to this study, each included 13 patients. The main judgement criterion was post-operative pain on the first day.ResultsPost-operative pain on the first day was less important (50 vs 23% p=0.04) in Joel-Cohen's. This method was shorter compared to the transrectal incision (33.6+6.4 min vs 51.2+8 min p<0.0001). There was no difference in overall morbidity between the two groups.ConclusionJoel-Cohen's method decrease post-operative pain and is a shorter procedure compared to the transrectal incision.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (16)
- Finger‐assisted stretching technique for cesarean section via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780109.x via openalex
- doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780109.x via openalex
- doi:10.1080/791201845 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800119.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-199102000-00027 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.780709.x via openalex
- W166272366 via openalex
- W2461746732 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780709.x via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811108.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00589-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0028-2243(94)90218-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1017/s0965539501000237 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09839.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01957-9 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:52:15.578221+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK