Hysterectomy using the vNOTES technique. Experience from a highly specialized center
This retrospective cohort study of 20 patients found that vNOTES hysterectomy for uterine pathologies, including adenomyosis, was a safe procedure with minimal complications, low blood loss, and short hospital stays.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy in a small group of 20 patients with various uterine pathologies. The procedure demonstrated favorable outcomes, including a mean surgical time of 60 minutes, low estimated blood loss, zero complications, and minimal postoperative pain scores over seven days. Although the sample size is limited, the authors conclude that vNOTES is a safe alternative to conventional techniques for selected cases. Relevance to endometriosis: adenomyosis is listed as one of the specific uterine pathologies included in the patient cohort, though the paper's primary focus remains on the surgical technique itself rather than disease-specific management.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,083 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 6 sections
· click to expand
Background
Objective
Material and methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:29:59.487465+00:00