Arthroscopy and manipulation versus home therapy program in treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study.

Smitherman JA, Struk AM, Cricchio M, McFadden G, Dell RB, Horodyski M, Wright TW
Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances · 2015 · doi:10.3113/jsoa.2015.0069 · PMID:25830267
OA: closed
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

This prospective randomized study compared the efficacy of arthroscopic shoulder capsular release against a nonoperative home therapy program for treating adhesive capsulitis. The research included twenty-six patients, with final analyses comprising ten participants in the operative group and seven in the nonoperative group, all receiving identical post-intervention stretching regimens. The results indicated no statistical differences between the two groups regarding gender, age, or treatment outcomes, suggesting both modalities are effective. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This study determined in a prospective manner if arthroscopic shoulder capsular release can decrease the duration of adhesive capsulitis symptoms when compared with a nonoperative home therapy program. Patients randomized to the operative group underwent arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation of the shoulder. Immediately after surgery they began the same stretching program as the nonoperative group, which consisted of terminal range of motion low-grade stretches twice daily for at least 15 minutes per session for 3 months. Twenty-six patients granted consent for the study (final analyses included 10 operative and 7 nonoperative). There were no statistical differences between the groups regarding gender, age (operative mean age, 51.5 ± 11.1 years; nonoperative mean age, 52.0 ± 6.8 years) or treatment outcome. This prospective, randomized study, which compared arthroscopic capsular release to a gentle home stretching program, demonstrated both treatment options to be effective treatment modalities.
Full text 1,475 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
James Adam Smitherman, MD; Aimee M. Struk, MEd, ATC, LAT; Mike Cricchio, OTR/L; Ginny McFadden, OTR/L; Ruth B. Dell, OTR/L; MaryBeth Horodyski, EdD, ATC; and Thomas W. Wright, MD Arthroscopy and Manipulation Versus Home Therapy Program in Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Prospective Randomized Study $25.00 This study determined in a prospective manner if arthroscopic shoulder capsular release can decrease the duration of adhesive capsulitis symptoms when compared with a nonoperative home therapy program. Patients randomized to the operative group underwent arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation of the shoulder. Immediately after surgery they began the same stretching program as the nonoperative group, which consisted of terminal range of motion low-grade stretches twice daily for at least 15 minutes per session for 3 months. Twenty-six patients granted consent for the study (final analyses included 10 operative and 7 nonoperative). There were no statistical differences between the groups regarding gender, age (operative mean age, 51.5 š 11.1 years; nonoperative mean age, 52.0 š 6.8 years) or treatment outcome. This prospective, randomized study, which compared arthroscopic capsular release to a gentle home stretching program, demonstrated both treatment options to be effective treatment modalities. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 24(1):69–74, 2015) Key words: adhesive capsulitis, physical therapy, shoulder, surgery

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00