The past, present and future of online biodiversity knowledge systems

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,566 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. In recent decades, there has been an exponential increase in the availability and accessibility of biodiversity data and a profusion of portals, tools, and platforms through which to utilise it. This reflects the extensive variety of challenges biodiversity data is being used to address and the need to enhance decision-making by different stakeholder groups. Whilst this has provided unprecedented opportunities for those outside mainstream academia to contribute to and benefit from these resources, it can create confusion in navigating biodiversity data within a highly saturated landscape. This paper reviews the current state of online tools for biodiversity capturing both global systems, alongside a non-comprehensive sample of regional and national systems. We aim to highlight areas of duplication and identify gaps and offer suggestions on paths forward to consolidate systems to provide greater impact. We present a new database of around 700 global, 250 regional and potentially over 3000 national web-based data systems and apply bot a newly developed online data systems typology as well as the DPSR+B (Drivers, Pressure, State, Response, Benefits) framework to categorise them. Finally, we consider whether target groups are well defined for these platforms. Our analysis shows that gaps exist for natures benefits, agricultural and wildlife related supply chains, and specific pressures such as illegal and unsustainable use. Moreover, we discuss that users’ inability to find the right tools, or interpret some accurately, may lead to poorer conservation outcomes. We make a series of recommendations in relation to a next-generation of online systems that reduce redundancy, lower costs, and improve delivery of information for decision-making. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2464F Biodiversity, Life Sciences Platforms, nature, data, Knowledge, decision-making Published: 2025-09-25 00:23 Last Updated: 2025-09-25 00:23 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data (as Excel files) will be made available together with the text of the paper Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00