What Happens to Endometriomas After Menopause? A Non-Invasive Follow-Up Focusing on Ultrasound Features and Clinical Changes
This study describes the ultrasound features and clinical course of ovarian endometriomas in postmenopausal women, finding early dimensional reduction and later structural remodeling without malignant changes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective observational study followed postmenopausal women with at least one ovarian endometrioma identified by transvaginal ultrasound, using baseline and 12- and 24-month clinical and ultrasound assessments (2018–2023, University of Rome Tor Vergata), with endometrioma size classified by the #Enzian system. Among 41 women (45 endometriomas), most lesions were unilocular with “ground glass” echogenicity and were predominantly #Enzian O1 at the first postmenopausal scan, and the key findings were significant early size regression from pre- to postmenopause with continued decline at 12 and 24 months. Later, morpho-structural changes emerged, particularly an increase in wall irregularities, while vascularization stayed minimal and serum epithelial tumor markers remained normal, with no suspicious or malignant transformations observed and pain symptoms stable. The paper’s major limitation is its retrospective design and the relatively small, single-center cohort. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it longitudinally characterizes how ovarian endometriomas evolve after menopause using ultrasound and clinical follow-up.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,500 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-01T00:30:07.445020+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine