Distinguishing near- versus off-critical phase behaviors of intrinsically disordered proteins

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,311 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Intrinsically disordered prion-like low complexity domains (PLCDs) drive phase transitions that underlie the biogenesis of different biomolecular condensates. The mapping of critical points is essential for generating quantitative assessments of driving forces and for distinguishing phase behaviors in the critical versus off-critical regimes. Computations play an important role in connecting the molecular-scale interactions to mesoscale phase behaviors of PLCDs and other intrinsically disordered proteins. We report results from accurate mapping of the critical regime for an archetypal PLCD. This is achieved by combining large-scale simulations with computations of Binder cumulants and the use of rigorous finite-size scaling approaches. The computed binodal, defined by knowledge of the critical point and intersection of the left arm of the binodal by the overlap and percolation lines, can be demarcated into three distinct regimes. Regime I is farthest from the critical point, with the coexisting dilute phase being akin to a gas of dispersed polymers. Regime II lies above the intersection of the overlap line and the dilute arm of the binodal. Here, coexisting dilute phases are characterized by heterogeneous cluster-size distributions with heavy tails. In Regimes I and II, dense phases are confined percolated networks. Regime III is closest to the critical point. Here, the dense phase becomes unconfined and the percolated network swells to become system-spanning. Thus, Regime III comprises two interconnected, system-spanning networks. In addition to accurately mapping the critical point, we also evaluated methods for identifying the theta temperature. We find that conventional scaling approaches lead to erroneously low estimates of the theta temperature. Instead, accurate estimation of the theta temperature requires direct calculation of the temperature dependence of the two-body interaction coefficient. We discuss the broader implications of these findings for inferring solvent quality from scaling analyses. Competing Interest Statement RVP is a member of the scientific advisory board and shareholder of Dewpoint Therapeutics. Footnotes Revisions were made following the first round of peer reviews. The revised version, being uploaded here, is now under peer review.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00