Area under curve of temporal estradiol measurements for prediction of the detrimental effect of estrogen exposure on implantation
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
The area under the curve of temporal estradiol measurements during assisted reproductive technology cycles was found to predict implantation failure and clinical pregnancy success.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the area under the curve of temporal estradiol measurements (AUCEM) during cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART) can be used to predict failure of implantation and clinical pregnancy. METHODS: In a prospective study, women aged 24-39years undergoing ART at a center in Turkey were enrolled between January and December 2014. Eligible patients had a regular menstrual cycle, normal levels of serum prolactin, and no hormone treatment within the past 3months. The area under the curve of the time course of estradiol measurements was calculated for each participant, and assessed for its ability to predict successful implantation. RESULTS: Among 282 participants, 109 (38.6%) women had successful implantation. There was a significant difference between the two groups of women in AUCEM, estradiol per day (AUCEM divided by duration of stimulation), and endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: The area under the curve of estradiol measurements during ART cycles might be useful for predicting failure of implantation and clinical pregnancy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (28)
- A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.045 via openalex
- doi:10.1038/nrg1808 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02018-0 via openalex
- doi:10.22074/ijfs.2021.244054 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048933 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/der452 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod67.4.1268 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58337-x via openalex
- doi:10.5653/cerm.2011.38.3.119 via openalex
- doi:10.1098/rsob.130035 via openalex
- doi:10.1530/jme-15-0254 via openalex
- doi:10.1073/pnas.0530162100 via openalex
- W2162416216 via openalex
- W2416196378 via openalex
- W4327627993 via openalex
- W6622670422 via openalex
- W6684162363 via openalex
- W6716713832 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/aji.12226 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1043-2760(03)00084-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.025692 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/0974-1208.165153 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(02)00108-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/15.2.250 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00140-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0039-128x(03)00126-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136313 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:17:40.080092+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK