Direct observation of the neural computations underlying a single decision
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study simultaneously recorded from hundreds of lateral intraparietal cortex neurons in monkeys and found that a weighted sum of their activity represents a drift-diffusion signal that underlies variability in perceptual decisions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Neurobiological investigations of perceptual decision-making have furnished the first glimpse of a flexible cognitive process at the level of single neurons ( Shadlen and Newsome, 1996 ; Shadlen and Kiani, 2013 ). Neurons in the parietal and prefrontal cortex ( Kim and Shadlen, 1999 ; Romo et al., 2004 ; Hernández et al., 2002; Ding and Gold, 2012 ) are thought to represent the accumulation of noisy evidence, acquired over time, leading to a decision. Neural recordings averaged over many decisions have provided support for the deterministic rise in activity to a termination bound ( Roitman and Shadlen, 2002 ). Critically, it is the unobserved stochastic component that is thought to confer variability in both choice and decision time ( Gold and Shadlen, 2007 ). Here, we elucidate this drift-diffusion signal on individual decisions. We recorded simultaneously from hundreds of neurons in the lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of monkeys while they made decisions about the direction of random dot motion. We show that a single scalar quantity, derived from the weighted sum of the population activity, represents a combination of deterministic drift and stochastic diffusion. Moreover, we provide direct support for the hypothesis that this drift-diffusion signal approximates the quantity responsible for the variability in choice and reaction times. The population-derived signals rely on a small subset of neurons with response fields that overlap the choice targets. These neurons represent the integral of noisy evidence. Another subset of direction-selective neurons with response fields that overlap the motion stimulus appear to represent the integrand. This parsimonious architecture would escape detection by state-space analyses, absent a clear hypothesis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00