Modeling patient variants of Cnot1 and Cdc42bpb results in distinct forms of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in mice

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,888 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a severe congenital anomaly characterized by impairment of both diaphragm and lung development in utero. CDH presents as a spectrum of forms and severities, with diaphragm defects arising in the dorsal/posterior region typically correlating with more severe pulmonary disease and higher risk of mortality than those appearing in ventral/anterior regions. The genetic etiology underlying CDH is complex, with many genes implicated showing variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance in both human patients and mouse models. Here we present in vivo validation of two genes previously unassociated with CDH: the CDC42-interacting kinase CDC42BPB; and CNOT1, a scaffolding protein of the CCR4-NOT protein complex, critical for mRNA regulation through modifications such as deadenylation. Each gene was found to have a damaging, de novo missense variant in a recent large-scale CDH patient sequencing screen. Loss of Cdc42bpb leads to ventral diaphragmatic hernias, heart septal defects and minor lung epithelial differentiation defects in mouse embryos. Installation of the orthologous patient-specific missense variant through CRISPR/Cas9 editing leads to less severe ventral diaphragm defects. Mouse embryos with either one or two copies of the orthologous Cnot1 variant, c.1867C>T (p.R623W), develop dorsal diaphragmatic hernias with low (<50%) penetrance, and mutants showed alterations in mRNA isoform expression consistent with the molecular role of Cnot1 in RNA splicing. These results underscore the power of in vivo functional modeling to validate genes and patient-specific variants uncovered by patient sequencing, reveal two previously unrecognized genetic causes of CDH, and highlight the heterogeneity of different patient anatomic presentations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00