Impact of Parallel vs. Non Parallel Corpora on the Identification of Arabic Dialects
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
In this paper, we conduct a study to evaluate the performance of statistical and neural methods to classify Arabic Dialects (AD). This evaluation is based on two kinds of corpora. The first one is a corpus named PADIC (Parallel Arabic DIalectal Corpus), which is a multi-dialectal corpus composed of six dialects: two Algerian dialects (of Algiers and Annaba cities), Palestinian, Syrian, Tunisian, and Moroccan, in addition to MSA. The second one (AraDial) is a manually collected corpus that contains the same dialects as well as the same number of sentences as PADIC (6412 sentences for each dialect). In our experiments, we used both statistical and neural classifiers, namely: Gaussian Naive Bayes, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, kNN, Logistic Regression, SGD Classifier, Passive Aggressive Classifier, Perceptron, Linear Support Vector, and Convolutional Neural Network Classifiers. We evaluated these classifiers in two setups: training on a parallel corpus (PADIC) and testing on the non-parallel corpus and vice versa. The obtained results have shown that training our system on a non-parallel corpus will give better results, as we achieved a mean score of 92.08\%.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00