Acceleration and Velocity Dissociate Temporal Phases of Postural Control in Rhesus Macaques

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This study investigated how the nervous system organizes temporal phases of postural control during transient rotational pitch and roll tilts in rhesus macaques by independently manipulating angular acceleration and peak velocity while recording head kinematics and center-of-pressure dynamics. The key finding was a dissociation in timing: short-latency postural responses under 100 ms were primarily governed by angular acceleration, whereas medium-latency responses between 100 and 200 ms scaled with angular velocity, with both effects robust across perturbation axes. The authors also reported axis-dependent control strategies, with roll tilts showing constrained, active stabilization-like head motion and pitch tilts showing more compliant, platform-following behavior. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,527 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Maintaining balance requires the nervous system to transform sensory signals about unexpected postural perturbations into precisely timed motor commands. Although human studies have established that postural responses unfold in distinct temporal phases, how specific kinematic variables structure these phases during rotational perturbations remains unresolved, because angular acceleration and velocity are typically confounded. Here, we developed a rhesus macaque model of postural control that independently manipulates angular acceleration and peak velocity during transient pitch and roll tilts in monkeys of either sex. By simultaneously measuring head kinematics—directly relevant to vestibular signaling—and center-of-pressure dynamics, we quantified how sensory inputs and motor outputs evolve across successive phases of the postural response. We show that short-latency postural responses (<100 ms) are primarily governed by angular acceleration, whereas medium-latency responses (100–200 ms) scale with angular velocity. This dissociation was robust across perturbation axes and accompanied by axis-dependent control strategies: roll tilts elicited constrained head motion consistent with active stabilization in space, whereas pitch tilts produced more compliant, platform-following behavior. Together, these findings identify distinct kinematic variables governing successive phases of balance control and establish a primate framework for linking neural circuit activity to the temporal organization of postural responses. Significance Statement Maintaining balance requires transforming sensory signals about unexpected body motion into precisely timed motor commands. Progress in understanding this process has been limited because angular acceleration and velocity are inherently coupled during rotational perturbations. Here, using a rhesus macaque model, we dissociate these kinematic variables and show that they govern distinct temporal phases of postural control: angular acceleration determines short-latency (<100 ms) responses, whereas angular velocity shapes medium-latency (100–200 ms) adjustments. We further demonstrate axis-dependent postural strategies that parallel those observed in humans. Together, these findings resolve a longstanding confound in balance research and establish a primate framework that will enable future studies to link neural circuit activity to the biomechanics of postural control. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00