Analyzing the Barriers Affecting the Adoption of Green Computing: A Hybrid Method Approach

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study used ISM, MICMAC, and DEMATEL analyses on expert data to identify firm size and legal barriers as most fundamental, with adoption costs being the most important dimension influencing green computing adoption.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This preprint studied barriers hindering the adoption and deployment of green computing by identifying 12 barriers from the literature, clustering them into adoption-cost, technological, and internal barrier groups, and assessing their mutual influences and importance using data from 15 field experts. The authors applied Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and MICMAC to examine relationships among barriers, reporting that firm size and legal barriers were most fundamental and independent with the greatest system impact, while DEMATEL was used to rank barrier importance and depict cause–effect links. DEMATEL results indicated adoption cost barriers were most important (Ri+Ci = 32.888), with transactional risk (Ri+Ci = 24.160), technological complexity (Ri+Ci = 12.647), and switching cost (Ri+Ci = 14.483) highlighted within dimensions. The study is limited by its reliance on expert judgments and by being an unreviewed preprint. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

While there is a plethora of research on the firms’ efforts toward environmental sustainability, it has been found that green computing has not been so prominent due to some burdens that are hindering their development and rapid deployment. Accordingly, upon identification of twelve barriers from the literature and clustering them into three groups of adoption costs, technological barriers, and internal barriers, the mutual influences and the importance level of barriers were investigated using the data collected from fifteen experts in the field. The Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) together with the Matrice d'Impacts Croises Multipication Applique´ an Classment (MICMAC) analyses methods were used to investigate the mutual influences amongst the barriers. The results of the ISM and MICMAC revealed that firm size and legal barriers are the most fundamental and independent ones which have the greatest impact on the system. Moreover, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was applied to reveal the importance level of barriers and further depict cause and effect relationships among them. The DEMATEL results revealed that, from the perspective of the experts, adoption cost barriers are more important than the other dimensions (Ri+Ci = 32.888). Furthermore, transactional risk (Ri+Ci = 24.160), technological complexity (Ri+Ci = 12.647), and switching cost (Ri+Ci = 14.483) were identified as the most important barriers related to each dimension. This study's developed decision-making framework would assist managers and practitioners in comprehending the relationships between the barriers that have been identified and how they interact when trying to practice green computing initiatives.
Full text 10,780 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Analyzing the Barriers Affecting the Adoption of Green Computing: A Hybrid Method Approach | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Analyzing the Barriers Affecting the Adoption of Green Computing: A Hybrid Method Approach Mohammad Dalvi-Esfahani, Mehrbakhsh Nilashi This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348009/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract While there is a plethora of research on the firms’ efforts toward environmental sustainability, it has been found that green computing has not been so prominent due to some burdens that are hindering their development and rapid deployment. Accordingly, upon identification of twelve barriers from the literature and clustering them into three groups of adoption costs, technological barriers, and internal barriers, the mutual influences and the importance level of barriers were investigated using the data collected from fifteen experts in the field. The Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) together with the Matrice d'Impacts Croises Multipication Applique´ an Classment (MICMAC) analyses methods were used to investigate the mutual influences amongst the barriers. The results of the ISM and MICMAC revealed that firm size and legal barriers are the most fundamental and independent ones which have the greatest impact on the system. Moreover, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was applied to reveal the importance level of barriers and further depict cause and effect relationships among them. The DEMATEL results revealed that, from the perspective of the experts, adoption cost barriers are more important than the other dimensions (Ri+Ci = 32.888). Furthermore, transactional risk (Ri+Ci = 24.160), technological complexity (Ri+Ci = 12.647), and switching cost (Ri+Ci = 14.483) were identified as the most important barriers related to each dimension. This study's developed decision-making framework would assist managers and practitioners in comprehending the relationships between the barriers that have been identified and how they interact when trying to practice green computing initiatives. Green computing Interpretive structural modeling MICMAC DEMATEL Barriers Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-2348009","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":158127676,"identity":"4869ca20-6236-4732-a7f8-97376d7eccde","order_by":0,"name":"Mohammad Dalvi-Esfahani","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammad","middleName":"","lastName":"Dalvi-Esfahani","suffix":""},{"id":158127677,"identity":"a3ae41f8-9962-4947-b005-c8523a6d8b21","order_by":1,"name":"Mehrbakhsh Nilashi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UCSI University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mehrbakhsh","middleName":"","lastName":"Nilashi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-12-06 02:59:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348009/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348009/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":30097961,"identity":"7489ef48-766f-4cc1-bc6e-42ecbe543187","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-12-09 06:09:23","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":678916,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscrip.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2348009/v1_covered.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Analyzing the Barriers Affecting the Adoption of Green Computing: A Hybrid Method Approach","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Green computing, Interpretive structural modeling, MICMAC, DEMATEL, Barriers","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348009/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348009/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"While there is a plethora of research on the firms’ efforts toward environmental sustainability, it has been found that green computing has not been so prominent due to some burdens that are hindering their development and rapid deployment. Accordingly, upon identification of twelve barriers from the literature and clustering them into three groups of adoption costs, technological barriers, and internal barriers, the mutual influences and the importance level of barriers were investigated using the data collected from fifteen experts in the field. The Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) together with the Matrice d'Impacts Croises Multipication Applique´ an Classment (MICMAC) analyses methods were used to investigate the mutual influences amongst the barriers. The results of the ISM and MICMAC revealed that firm size and legal barriers are the most fundamental and independent ones which have the greatest impact on the system. Moreover, the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method was applied to reveal the importance level of barriers and further depict cause and effect relationships among them. The DEMATEL results revealed that, from the perspective of the experts, adoption cost barriers are more important than the other dimensions (Ri+Ci = 32.888). Furthermore, transactional risk (Ri+Ci = 24.160), technological complexity (Ri+Ci = 12.647), and switching cost (Ri+Ci = 14.483) were identified as the most important barriers related to each dimension. This study's developed decision-making framework would assist managers and practitioners in comprehending the relationships between the barriers that have been identified and how they interact when trying to practice green computing initiatives.","manuscriptTitle":"Analyzing the Barriers Affecting the Adoption of Green Computing: A Hybrid Method Approach","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-12-09 06:09:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348009/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"045cec1a-4a62-4990-8354-7b62c3171885","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 9th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-12-16T23:44:10+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-12-09 06:09:06","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-2348009","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-2348009","identity":"rs-2348009","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"FbvkV6FR0MCFSLy54lSbu","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00