Surgical Interventions for Subfertility in Patients with Endometriosis

In: MD Conference Express · 2014 · vol. 14(7) , pp. 19 · doi:10.1177/155989771407015 · W2318875069
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-31 ⓘ

This article discusses surgical management strategies for endometriosis-associated subfertility and pain, highlighting therapies that can improve patients' chances of conceiving.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-31 · read from full text ⓘ

This article reviews the surgical management of endometriosis-associated subfertility, noting that the condition affects approximately 30% of subfertile women and reduces fecundity through distorted pelvic anatomy and decreased ovarian reserve. While laparoscopic removal of implants benefits patients with minimal to moderate disease, advanced stages typically require in vitro fertilization for successful conception, as surgery alone does not significantly improve pregnancy rates for these individuals. The text highlights conflicting evidence regarding endometrioma excision, concluding that surgical intervention is primarily warranted for pain relief rather than fertility enhancement in asymptomatic cases. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically addressing the surgical treatment of endometriosis-associated subfertility and pain across different disease stages.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a known cause of subfertility in women, but therapies exist that can improve patients' chances of conceiving. This article discusses the surgical management of endometriosis-associated subfertility and pain.
Full text 4,057 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Summary Endometriosis is a known cause of subfertility in women, but therapies exist that can improve patients' chances of conceiving. This article discusses the surgical management of endometriosis-associated subfertility and pain. - Urogenital Diseases - Infertility - Obstetrics & Gynecology - Urogenital Diseases - Infertility Endometriosis is a known cause of subfertility in women, but therapies exist that can improve patients' chances of conceiving. Gregory M. Christman, MD, of the University of Florida, Gainesville, USA, discussed the surgical management of endometriosis-associated subfertility and pain. There are 3 different manifestations of endometriosis: endometriotic implants, endometriomas, and rectovaginal adenomyotic nodules. Although all are defined as endometriosis, they tend to have different behaviors and treatment outcomes. Endometriosis is present in about 30% of subfertile women [ACOG. Obstet Gynecol 1999] and is associated with reduced fecundity [Hughes EG et al. Fertil Steril 1993]. This maybe the result of an inadequate peritoneal environment and distorted pelvic anatomy, which may have negative effects on oocyte, sperm, embryo, endometrial, or fallopian tube function [Monsour G et al. Fertil Steril 2009; Halis G, Arid A. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; Martinez-Roman S et al. Hum Reprod 1997]. In addition, endometriosis is associated with reduced ovarian reserve when compared with patients who do not have endometriosis [Shebl O et al. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009; Hock DL et al. Reprod Med 2001]. Patients with more advanced stage endometriosis have been shown to have worse fecundity, and typically they require in vitro fertilization (IVF) for fertility treatment. Patients who have stage III or IV endometriosis and undergo IVF have a pregnancy rate of 13.8%, whereas 21.1% of patients with stage I or II endometriosis and 27.7% of patients without endometriosis were successful at achieving pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.74) [Bernhart K et al. Fertil Steril 2002]. However, patients with stage III or IV endometriosis who received oocyte donation from a single donor without endometriosis had a live birth rate similar to that of patients without endometriosis. When managing endometriomas, surgical excision, rather than ablation, is the favored technique for endometriomas >4 cm [Alborzi S et al. Fertil Steril 2004; Beretta P et al. Fertil Steril 1998]. In addition, excision is associated with reduced rate of recurrence and superior improvement in pain [Hart RJ et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008]. There is uncertainty, however, about when endometriomas should be managed surgically. One study suggested that surgery does not appear to improve fertility when compared with expectant management [Vercellini P et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006]. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with endometriosis who then went on to undergo IVF, suggested that removal of the endometrioma resulted in favorable IVF outcomes [Tsoumpou I et al. Fertil Steril 2009]. Conversely, another meta-analysis found that the pregnancy rates following surgery with or without medical management had no positive effect on fertility [Vercellini P et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; Hughes E et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000]. Considering these data, Prof. Christman commented that surgery is warranted for any patient who has pain, and it may have the added benefit of slightly improving spontaneous pregnancy rates. For patients who have no pain, there is not enough improvement in fertility to recommend surgery. In conclusion, patients with minimal or moderate endometriosis may benefit from laparoscopic surgery and removal of endometriotic implants. For patients with more advanced endometriosis, although they have lower conception rates, IVF remains the most successful treatment for them. Additionally, surgical management in the case of endometriomas may offer slightly increased conception rates, but it should be done only in symptomatic patients. - © 2014 MD Conference Express®

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK