Robustness to noise reveals cross-culturally consistent properties of pitch perception for harmonic and inharmonic sounds

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Pitch is a building block of speech and music, but the extent to which pitch perception is shared across cultures is unclear. Evidence from Western participants suggests that pitch perception relies on multiple representations. For instance, harmonic tones are easier to discriminate in noise than inharmonic tones despite comparable discrimination in quiet, suggesting that different representations are used in noise and quiet. We tested whether these effects are present cross-culturally, comparing participants from the US and a Bolivian Amazonian Indigenous community (Tsimane’). Participants heard two-note melodies and reproduced the melody by singing. Tones were either harmonic or inharmonic and were presented in noise or quiet. Both groups exhibited two characteristics of pitch perception previously seen in US listeners: the direction of pitch changes could be reproduced with equal accuracy for harmonic and inharmonic tones in quiet but was better for harmonic than inharmonic tones in noise. However, replicating previous work, Tsimane’ vocal reproductions were much less likely to be related to the absolute pitch or chroma of the stimulus notes, differing from the tendency seen in Western participants to match pitch and/or chroma. Pitch and chroma matching behavior were more prominent in a subset of Tsimane’ whose responses to a demographic survey suggested greater integration with global and Bolivian markets and culture. The results demonstrate that the basic structure of pitch perception is shared across cultures despite other differences in pitch-related behavior that are plausibly driven by culture-specific experience.
Full text 1,857 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Pitch is a building block of speech and music, but the extent to which pitch perception is shared across cultures is unclear. Evidence from Western participants suggests that pitch perception relies on multiple representations. For instance, harmonic tones are easier to discriminate in noise than inharmonic tones despite comparable discrimination in quiet, suggesting that different representations are used in noise and quiet. We tested whether these effects are present cross-culturally, comparing participants from the US and a Bolivian Amazonian Indigenous community (Tsimane’). Participants heard two-note melodies and reproduced the melody by singing. Tones were either harmonic or inharmonic and were presented in noise or quiet. Both groups exhibited two characteristics of pitch perception previously seen in Western listeners: the direction of pitch changes could be reproduced with equal accuracy for harmonic and inharmonic tones in quiet but was better for harmonic than inharmonic tones in noise. However, replicating previous work, Tsimane’ vocal reproductions were much less likely to be related to the absolute pitch or chroma of the stimulus notes, differing from the tendency seen in Western participants to match pitch and/or chroma. Pitch and chroma matching behavior were more prominent in a subset of Tsimane’ whose responses to a demographic survey suggested greater integration with global and Bolivian markets and culture. The results demonstrate that the basic structure of pitch perception is shared across cultures despite other differences in pitch-related behavior that are plausibly driven by culture-specific experience. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Updated figures; text clarifications; one experiment moved to supplement; additional robustness analyses

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00