Pragmatic Strategies in Digital Activism: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Language Use in Social Justice Movements

Pragmatic Strategies in Digital Activism: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Language Use in Social Justice Movements | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Pragmatic Strategies in Digital Activism: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Language Use in Social Justice Movements AHMAD RAZA, Urooj Fatima Alvi This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7980722/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The present research project Adopts a corpus-based analytical prism to question the deliberate use of language by three prominent current social-justice movements: Black Lives Matter, Me Too and Extinction Rebellion. A series of intertwined questions are inquired in the inquiry: How do activists plan word selections with the aim to structure their grievances, achieve group solidarity, stimulate mass mobilization, and overcome digital barriers of censorship and governmental surveillance? To address these questions, the researcher demonstrates that activists regularly summon framing devices, politeness gambits, speech acts, and indirect signals in order to target diverse audiences seek both a collective identity and the means of promoting resistance to current regimes of power. Examples of timelines taken on social-media networks are examined to understand various rhetorical tactics in social awareness, namely punchy metaphors, visceral emotional cues, encompassing pronouns, and categorical commands to action, are used to represent the idea (or ideas) as well as to push reform in a certain direction. By bypassing algorithmic filters, activists use strategies such as irony, indirect phrasing, and euphemism, which enable their posts to remain accessible and widely shared across digital platforms. Overall, the findings lay pragmatic practices in the foreground as the driving force of online protest, as well as the node at which language, power and social change intersect in networked space. The findings add to the growing literature on corpus pragmatics and its contribution includes one that maps the pragmatic functions that are performed in digital activism. They also furnish a facts-based narrative of discourse which gives consideration to the special motivations and opportunities of digital protest. In the conclusion, the paper provides recommendations on the future research, cues on new platforms to study and new techniques of resistance to focus on to abate the extremely fast development of the nature of digital activism. Digital Activism Corpus Pragmatics Social Justice Movements Speech Acts Framing Strategies Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 1. Introduction In recent years, digital platforms have become central to the success of social justice movements, offering activists unprecedented opportunities to organize, advocate, and mobilize on a global scale (Rangsarittikun, 2025). The BlackLivesMatter movement, the MeToo movement, the Extinction Rebellion movement, and many others, have leveraged the strength of digital platforms like X (which was named Twitter) and Instagram and Facebook to oppose the established power structures, inform about systemic problems, and assemble diverse groups of followers ( Marcia Mundt, Karen Ross, & Charla M. Burnett, 2018). However, these movements succeed not only because of the messages they deliver but also because of the strategic application of language, which is critically important in influencing the discourse of people and mobilizing them into collective action (Greene, 2019). The language of such movements is not only used to place issues into perspective but also to create emotional responses, construct collective identities, and act, and this is an essential component of their success (Richardson, 2020) As the digital activism develops further, the linguistic and pragmatic perspective taken in them acquires an increasingly greater importance (Olajimbiti, 2025). Scholars have poured over the slogans, memes, and hashtags that crowd a timeline, yet surprisingly little attention has landed on the day-to-day talk between activists and the followers who tap SHARE. That conversation, and its occasional misfire, is exactly what pragmatics the study of language roots itself in context promise to illuminate. Drawing on a digital corpus built from multiple movements, the present study examined replies within the corpus, quotes, and threaded threads to map the linguistic tricks activists use to frame problems, forge connections, push people into the street, and sidestep obstacles such as state surveillance and platform censorship. Why linger on these small verbal moves? They matter because they show how words can knit strangers into a crowd, deflect hostile readers, and keep a cause alive when attention drifts. By focusing on BlackLivesMatter, MeToo, and Extinction Rebellion, the research offers a fresh test case for corpus pragmatics and, just maybe, helps explain how tweets and posts sometimes nudge entire societies toward change. In this research, the researcher will study the role of modern activists in framing their problems, mobilizing politeness moves, performing performative speech acts, and merging direct and indirect talk to social media. It is aimed at tracking how these language preferences continue to imbalance power dynamics, initiate social transformation, and precondition the popular discourse. The conclusions are supposed to help movement leaders write stinging posts, to avoid the pitfalls of the online, and to win the attention of the readers in the long term. It is also a contribution of this research to the growing body of corpus pragmatics that they can test their methods of analysis on large, publicly accessible conversation. This work makes pragmatic approaches its central analytical point. These strategies are called the strategic language and contextual decisions that speakers make in order to produce certain communicative objectives in a conversation in the sphere of pragmatics (Levinson, 1983; Verschueren, 1997). In digital activism, the practices of pragmatic strategies as language modalities comprise the framing of issues, expression of support or opposition, negotiation of meaning, and continuity of engagement within online communities by the activist. Such strategies come in the form of framing, politeness and speech acts which are both expressive and persuasive. Through analyzing such strategies on massive amounts of data on activist discourse, this paper aims at revealing the ways in which every day, ordinary linguistic decisions provoke a wider process of mobilization and social consciousness online. Objectives The present study aimed to examine how digital activists strategically employ language in social justice movements. First, it investigated the framing strategies used to shape public perception and engage wider audiences, with particular attention to how such frames challenge or reinforce dominant narratives. Second, it analyzed the deployment of politeness strategies and solidarity markers that enable activists to construct inclusive communities and foster collective participation. A further objective was to explore the role of speech acts particularly directives and expressives in motivating individuals to take action and reinforcing commitment within activist discourse. Finally, the study sought to identify the use of indirect communicative strategies, such as irony and euphemism, which allow activists to circumvent platform restrictions while maintaining the effectiveness of their messages. Research Questions Guided by these objectives, the study addressed the following research questions. It asked how digital activists frame social justice issues in their discourse, and what role these frames play in contesting dominant power structures. It further investigated which politeness strategies and solidarity markers are employed to build supportive and inclusive online communities within activist movements. Another question focused on the role of speech acts, particularly directives and expressives, in sustaining the success of digital activism by motivating participation and encouraging collective action. Finally, the study examined how indirect communication strategies, including irony and euphemism, are used to evade censorship and enhance the reach of activist messages. This study improves our knowledge of the ways digital activists employ pragmatic approaches to reach their audiences and negotiate the politics of digital environments. In this research paper, the expression pragmatic strategies is employed at all times to refer to communicative practices which help activists convey position, establish solidarity, and produce persuasion. Other terms which refer to communicative acts or techniques are construed on this same model in the interests of conceptual coherence. This study adds to the existing literature on digital activism and pragmatics by examining the linguistic aspects of the activist discourse. More so, it also provides valuable information on how language can be used to effect social change in the digital era, and how this may apply to future research and the digital activism practice itself. 2. Literature Review Digital activism, which has emerged due to the mass adoption of social media platforms, has altered the mode of social movement communication, mobilization, and their means to demand social change (Mendenhall, Kamau, Kenworthy, & Bosire, 2025). The role of online platforms as a means of activism has been examined by scholars, particularly how such movements as Black Lives Matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion use online platforms to propagate their message, find support, and pressure the current power regimes. As much as there is a good stock of academic literature that has been based around the subject matter of digital activism, minimal research has been done on how viable strategies can be used to enhance the success of activist communication. This review of the existing literature, which captures the theory behind this study, tries to fill this gap by conducting a review of the existing literature that characterizes digital activism, linguistic strategies, and pragmatics. 2.1. Digital Activism and Language Digital activism refers to an online communication strategy employed in promoting social, political or environmental change (Nhedzi & Azionya, 2025). The importance of language in the process should not be underestimated as it defines collective identities, mobilizes the masses, and manifests ideological standpoints on the digital arena. Activism online discourse is not merely the information sharing space but also a negotiation space, in which meaning, power, and solidarity are constantly being produced. Other researchers like Aarts (2013); Park (2015); Page (2019), and Papacharissi and Blasiola (2015) have put forward the focus on how language is used in digital spaces and how those who get involved in the digital space approach the concept of agency and urgency as applied to social causes. This interdependence between digital activism and language thus offers the basis on which the effect of the pragmatic strategies can be realized in the context of activist communication. The concept of digital activism as broadened by Ghobadi and Sonenshein (2024) and by Ley and Brewer (2018) defined as the application of digital media, in particular, social media, to mobilize and champion the change in the society, political, or environmental processes. The use of social media application like X (previously twitter), Facebook and Instagram have become important tools of modern activism as it connects globally and allows the formation of a real-time interactive dialogue. It is worth mentioning the BlackLivesMatter movement, which took advantage of such hashtags as #BlackLivesMatter to raise awareness about structural racism and police brutality and conducted protests and provided an opportunity to be heard by the mass media, which was historically silent (Cohen & Jackson, 2016; Marcia Mundt, Karen Ross, & Charla M Burnett, 2018). Similarly, MeToo movement took advantage of the hashtags of #MeToo to circulate issues of sexual misconduct and they formed a virtual circle of empathy and support to those who were affected by sexual misconduct, as illustrated by Mendes, Ringrose, and Keller (2018). Such shows have also proved that the virtual arenas can be as effective in amplifying the voices of the underrepresented and bringing sweeping change to the society (Olajimbiti, 2025). These social movements may be characterized by the use of specific language as the core issue to define what was in the representations of problems and mobilization of the followers. Framing Theory, the theory was first described by Manning (1998) and it presents an ideal perspective on the meaning-making processes of individuals and groups, which entails a selection and introduction of information in a strategic manner. Frames determine the way events and social issues are perceived by audiences by determining what gets highlighted and what gets dropped. In this research, the theory is especially relevant because it helps to understand the way in which social movements create compelling stories that shape the consciousness of people, informing their public speech. Framing is particular in digital activism since activists are able to frame the social problem in ways that will attract the attention and encourage the latter to act in response (Shah, Sivitanides, & Mehta, 2013). The Black LivesMatter movement can be cited as an example suggesting that the issue of racial injustice is demonstrated as a systemic problem, not the acts of violence alone. MeToo, in its turn, assists in placing the issue of sexual harassment in the societal-wide context as opposed to specific instances of bad behavior (Baer, 2018). 2.2. Pragmatics in Digital Activism Pragmatics is the science that studies the meaning production and interpretation of language users in given social situations. When transferred to digital activism, pragmatic theory enables the researchers to investigate how the activists shape a message that is not only expressive but also leads to social action. Previous works of H. P. Grice, Cole, and Morgan (1975) on implicature and Brown and Levinson (1987) on principles of politeness demonstrate how communicative decisions are determined by the intentions of the speaker and the expectations of the listener. These theories are applied in online activism to understand how an activist is able to balance between stance, persuasion, and community building, within an algorithmic and ideological confinement. The current research is based on these findings to determine the enlightened strategies that perpetuate the activism discussion over the platforms. Literature on digital activism has been paying very intensive attention to content and presentation of messages. Within pragmatics, H Paul Grice (1990) stressed that, people tend to utilize language in order to communicate some forms of meaning beyond the literal meaning. As an extension of this concept, other researchers have pointed out that the most fundamental concept of pragmatics can be found in the study of the interplay between language and its social context (Zhou & Wang, 2023). It is equally focused in the digital activism context in the sense that the activists are confronted with the need to negotiate a number of audiences, limitations brought about by digital media, and political forces that are inherent in the latter. Framing Theory, originally explained by Goffman (1974), and followed up by Manning (1998) is the manner in which individuals and groups frame perception by emphasizing some issues and minimizing others. In digital activism, framing dictates the manner in which causes are packaged in a manner that will cause empathy, rationale protest, and interest in taking action. Through the analysis of the linguistic framing process of activist talk, this paper will explain how the online movements build collective meaning and impact people to understand social issues. In this respect Politeness Theory by Brown and Levinson (1987) is an important theory used to analyze the interaction and strategy of activists to control the interaction to avoid alienation and hold on solidarity. More precisely, it illuminates the pragmatic process according to which the internal composition of utterances is engaged with the external requirements of discourse so that speakers may achieve a balance between the assertiveness and social harmonisation in their communication. Another example of this phenomenon is the use of polite words, and it can be observed in the case of how MeToo movement manages to talk about sensitive issues like sexual harassment using polite tone to make people discuss it but not to offend the people who may be unsupportive or even unaware of the aims of the movement. The political use of politeness strategies thus allows creating an atmosphere of camaraderie and inclusiveness, which are more than essential to the success of the effort of online activism. Besides, Speech Act Theory, which was proposed by Austin (1962) and advanced by Searle (1969), provides such a theoretical framework when analyzing the use of language by activist groups as implementation of certain actions. Directives, commissives, and expressives, which constitute speech acts, are significant in the process of triggering participation and cultivating solidarity in the context of digital activism (Schneider, 2022). One of the ways is through directives, where supporters are encouraged to take practical actions in order to support a cause by signing a petition or joining a protest. Commissives which move in a similar line like pledges or a promise also help beef up the causes of the movement and carry along long term participation. Through expressive speech acts, the activists are able to describe unity and sharing of common emotional experiences, thus a sense of shared identity and shared goals can be developed (Babazade, 2025). The structures of the framing theory, politeness theory, and speech act theory have supplied profound concepts into the world of digital activism. Despite that, most of the previous studies have been limited to qualitative content-based analysis which focuses on the surface dimensions of the messages posted in social media (Trnavac & Põldvere, 2024). One of the gaps present with regard to existing literature relates to the assessment of corpus linguistics in the research of digital activism. 2.3. Corpus Pragmatics and Digital Activism Corpus Linguistics offers systematic tools for studying language through large collections of authentic texts. It allows researchers to discover frequency, collocation and association patterns of words, which demonstrate tendencies within discourse (Biber, Conrad, & Reppen, 1998). These methods come in particularly handy in the study of digital communication where computing data with a large amount of data required to be processed. Based on the definition presented by Ranger (2015), the term Corpus Pragmatics can be explained as a mixture of the corpus-based methods and pragmatic interpretation that is to be employed to explore the issue of meaning creation and negotiation within the setting. It is a combination of quantitative accuracy and qualitative insight, and it allows the researcher to take note of the functions of such pragmatic phenomena of speech acts, politeness, and framing in bulk data set. This mixed framework is the foundation of the analysis of activist language in the current research that ensures that the two frequency patterns and the contextual interpretation of the activist language are considered. Corpus pragmatics, which offers a promising direction of the analysis of the use of language in the context of digital activism, is one of the latest interdisciplinary areas that combine corpus linguistics and the theory of pragmatics (Terkourafi, 2012). Although the use of corpus linguistics is a relatively advanced branch of research in such spheres like applied linguistics and discourse analysis, the role of such a method in exploring digital activism remains a relatively untapped domain. The quantitative approach to the analysis of the key terms and hashtags is the primary focus of the study of digital activism based on the corpus-based approach, yet it does not presuppose the systematic search of the instrumental aspect of the linguistic exploitation. For instance, the role of hashtags such as #BlackLivesMatter as instruments of protest and online resistance has been examined (Jackson & Banaszczyk, 2016). However, most of such studies are more inclined to ignore the pragmatic aspects of such communication including elements of framing, politeness strategies, and performative speech act. This intellectual gap highlights the need to have a more detailed analysis of the practical uses of language in the sphere of digital activism. 2.4. Identified Gaps in the Literature The body of research in digital activism has grown significantly over the past few years, but little has been done in terms of looking at how activists are able to build out their messages in a consecutive and strategic way. The research on the contents of communication or the political environment at large is done and the pragmatic machineries underlying are not examined in detail. Altahmazi (2020) reviewed such hashtags as BlackLivesMatter as a solidarity tool and collective identity, and Roy (2019) studied the position and aggression in online communication. In spite of the fact that these works provide us with the valuable knowledge on the linguistic knowledge of digital activism, they seldom explore the communicative processes involved step by step by which activists would construct and negotiate meaning. This dimension is the central concern of the present study. On a similar note, corpus linguistics-toolkits which are used to mine large bodies of language have barely been applied to activist locations, so small-scale anecdotal reports still predominate. This study investigates the underexplored intersection of corpus linguistics and pragmatic analysis within the context of digital activism. Focusing on campaigns like BlackLivesMatter, MeToo, and Extinction Rebellion, it poses the question of how activists package their messages, negotiate politeness, give performative instructions, and perform indirectly in online spaces that move quickly. It is especially concerned with the way in which such linguistic moves assist in the mobilisation of support and pressure against established power. However, much of the existing literature focuses mainly on visible elements such as hashtags and images. The use of language itself which is structured by rules and how this influences the construction and reception of messages has gotten a lot less focus. This work provides a fresh insight into the process of turning the ordinary speech into the potent tool of social change through the pragmatic characteristics of the activist discourse as a corpus and studying its different aspects. The project will be targeting a two-disciplinary connection that is not usually common. 3. Methodology The existing analysis uses corpus-based approaches to recognize and analyse the pragmatic strategies that are applied by campaigners in their attempts to create online support. 3.1. Corpus Creation and Data Collection The current research was developed on the purpose-constructed digital activism corpus, which gathers publicly available posts on the most popular social media, such as X (former Twitter), Facebook, and Instagram. The corpus was created to reflect the lingual activity of three movements known all over the world: Black Lives Matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion. The data were collected based on publicly available posts, which specifically used the official hashtags of the movements (e.g. #BlackLivesMatter, #MeToo, #ExtinctionRebellion) or other thematic keywords related to social justice, equality, and environmental activism. The total amount of the posts gathered during 2018–2023 is 27,500 posts and it contains around 1.9 million words. Keywords were used in sampling posts by a combination of manual or automated process. All the records in the dataset are the original content, the date of the publications, the user handle (anonymized), the number of reactions or shares, and other metadata available including hashtags and emojis. All user identifiable details were eliminated so as to preserve user privacy so that only randomly generated numbers were used to identify the post. The data were filtered using the posts that were in English language, and the non-textual data like videos or photos with no text accompanying it were eliminated. Single textual units were considered when users made threads or multi-post messages to maintain the continuity of discourse. This methodology enables the analysis to get individual utterances and long arguing common with online activism. A balanced sampling was used to have the platforms represented: half in X, 30 on Facebook and 20 on Instagram. The resulting corpus was manipulated in Python (3.11) with the use of libraries like pandas to clean up the data, spaCy to tokenize and lemmatize the data, and NLTK to analyze frequency and collocations. The Sketch Engine was able to support additional pragmatic tagging through manual verification to ensure context-sensitive patterns. Such a detailed description of corpus composition and metadata allows recreating the analysis and using it as a valid foundation, which can be ensured to ensure the given analysis will be conducted on a clear and verifiable set of data. 3.2. Pragmatic Annotation A body of text that resulted was annotated with a series of pragmatic cues that indicated how the users used language as a tool of digital activism. There are three coding categories that are created. 3.2.1. Framing Devices: Adopting Entman (1993) schema, the annotation will tag metaphors, emotional appeals, and rhetorical questions that recast social-justice stories in ways designed to unsettle prevailing frames (Matthes, 2012). 3.2.2. Politeness Strategies: In line with the taxonomy of Brown and Levinson (1987), we will find hedging words, types of mitigations and inclusive pronouns that can be used by speakers to save face at the same time demand a change. This discussion strives to demonstrate how activists balance empathy to the emotions of the audience and the need to advocate forcefully. 3.2.3. Speech Acts Each online text will be analyzed in terms of the basic illocutionary acts as discussed by Searle (1969) such as directives that call upon people to perform an action, expressives that reveal personal feelings, and commissives that show commitment to doing something in future. Through listing these primitive orders, permissions, pledges, the study will attempt to dig up the use of verbal trickery by activists to hook followers and create a sense of trust on newly basis. 3.2.4. Indirect Communication Strategies With more and more direct complaints being recorded through automated systems, activists are more subtle in their forms of expression, which this paper examines: irony that compels the reader to wink back, dulled dissent with soft edges through euphemism, and masking outrage behind laughter: punchline humor. These way-around statements allow the organizers to avoid scrapers and moderators and leave the audience alert to the implicit rebellion. 3.3. Data Analysis The analysis of the corpus is carried out in two stages of overlapping, one quantitative and the other qualitative and is interwoven in a manner that none of them prevails in the description. 3.3.1. Quantitative Analysis : Software packages like AntConc and WordSmith crunch digits, counting how often frames repeat, how politeness shifts by platform, and when indirect hints outpace blunt statements. Raw frequency patterns provide an initial outline of the dialect used within each movement, revealing which communicative moves gain or lose prominence in large-scale message streams. 3.3.2. Qualitative Analysis : Once the quantitative findings have been received, close scrutiny of the texts shall be implemented in an attempt to dig the contextual meanings behind the quantitative figures. The follow-up review will follow the combination of framing decisions, politeness actions, speech acts, and indirect hints to create meaning, develop trust, and influence people into action. 3.4. Sampling and Data Representation Since the content is scraped out of public feeds, the decision of speakers is based solely on the hashtags they add to, and not on their identity. The corpus has posts of both experienced activists and newcomers to the movement, with a range of activities running between those who were enthusiastic supporters and critics and neutral observers. 3.5. Reliability and Validity In order to increase the reliability, multiple coders who are not involved in the study will be asked to annotate the same piece of text, and each one of the analysts will be working separately until results are compared. The discrepancies in the coding that will arise, will be debated until a consensus is achieved, a process that will sharpen the data as well as enhance the collective judgment of the researchers. The entire data set will be released in an open-source manner such that the external scholars can replicate the results and look at the methodological processes hence ensuring transparency and responsibility in the research process. 3.6. Ethical Considerations Though the research uses social media feeds of the general population, moral restraints are still necessary. All the posts are deprived of names and handles and other identifying information in them and this enables the analysis to concentrate on word choice and not the person who wrote it. In making this pledge of de-identification and observing the laid down ethical guidelines, the researchers hope to protect the subjects against any unnecessary harm, yet access the abundant conversational data at the online level. 4. ANALYSIS In this section, the findings obtained through the corpus analysis will be explored, with a focus on the use of pragmatic strategies by the digital activists in the discussed social justice movements. In the current study, the researcher will focus on the use of framing, politeness strategies, and speech acts, and indirect communication as listed in the methodology above. According to the analysis, the notion of framing can be identified as the most prominent pragmatic approach in all three movements, which occupies over a third of all instances coded. Narratives are often built in posts and highlight feelings of injustice and collective responsibility, as in the examples of the post titled as We deserve a world where breathing is not a privilege and Silence is complicity . This set of words labels social issues as moral, which makes activism a civic responsibility among other issues and not the political option. 4.1. Frequency and Distribution of Pragmatic Strategies Table 1 Frequency of Pragmatic Strategies across Movements Pragmatic Strategy Black Lives Matter Me Too Extinction Rebellion Total Instances Percentage (%) Framing 2,480 1,930 1,640 6,050 33.2 Politeness 1,620 1,850 1,420 4,890 26.8 Speech Acts 1,980 1,640 1,310 4,930 27.1 Indirectness/Irony 820 750 640 2,210 12.1 Total Texts (Posts) 9,500 9,000 9,000 27,500 100 Politeness strategies are almost as common as framing mechanisms, and their purpose is to ensure that there is a sense of solidarity and to minimize conflict during controversial conversations. Inclusive language may be employed through the use of the plural pronoun we stand together and through the use of a more softening pronoun like let us rethink by the activists to have an emotional appeal to a common perspective of respect and teamwork. Another visible element is the use of speech acts, especially directives and expressives. Directive action terms like Join us today and Speak up for justice are addressed to action and the use of expressive terms like We hear you and Thank you standing strong create emotional appeal and empathies among the followers. Lastly, the use of indirect and ironic expressions is not common, though has a major pragmatic impact. Comments made with a sense of humor or irony, like the one that states the fact that it has been working so far to ignore climate change, subtle criticizes the opposing sides without making a direct attack. These strategies vary in intent of communication as they are distributed amongst the three movements. BlackLivesMatter applies framing and commands to build action, MeToo focuses on the expressives and politeness to provide emotional solidarity, and Extinction Rebellion applies irony and euphemism to challenge the authority by indirect means. 4.2. Framing Devices in Digital Activism Framing serves as a pivotal tactic for digital activists, allowing them to present issues in ways that resonate with audiences, influence their interpretations, and motivate collective support for their cause. The prevalence of framing mechanisms employed within the body of material offers a glimpse into the methods through which movements articulate matters of social justice and contest prevailing storylines. Table 2 Frequency of Framing Devices in Digital Activism Framing Device Black Lives Matter Me Too Extinction Rebellion Total Frequency Metaphors 120 85 110 315 Emotional Appeals 95 80 100 275 Rhetorical Questions 45 50 40 135 Crisis Framing 70 60 80 210 Metaphors Metaphorical language is also used very actively in the course of the three movements as one of the means explored by activists in making the subjects of concern to the society approachable and compelling. As an example, the Black Lives Matter movement frequently resorts to metaphors like fighting for justice in order to frame racial disparities as a conflict, uniting the followers on a common purpose. Emotional Appeals It is also worth emphasizing that the use of emotional appeals, especially in MeToo and Extinction rebellion is prevalent, thus it is crucial to create an emotional connection with a target audience. Involved parties of such movements use rhetoric as a tool to either arouse empathy or unhappiness or outrage, to action or to induce societal outrage to social injustices. Rhetorical Questions Rhetorical questions, which are less frequently used than either metaphors or emotion appeals, are used tactically to make the audience consider the possibility, as well as engage in analytical thinking. The example of this is seen in the actions of the Extinction Rebellion which often asks questions like, what will be the legacy we give our descendants? with the aim to face the general indifference towards the problem of climate change. The findings suggest that the use of framing is common in the digital activism field and that it is used to not merely craft messages, but challenge existing relations of power by restructuring issues in a way that results in the possibility of mobilization and the development of communal solidarity. 4.3. Politeness Strategies and Solidarity Appreciation of politeness strategies such as hedging, mitigation and inclusive language is especially relevant to digital activists, who seek to foster solidarity and promote inclusive discourse. Using polite words also helps activists to attract a wide audience without the danger of alienating possible supporters or contributors. Table 3 Distribution of Politeness Strategies across Movements Politeness Strategy Black Lives Matter Me Too Extinction Rebellion Total Instances Percentage (%) Positive Politeness (inclusive appeals) 920 1 040 730 2 690 31.3 Negative Politeness (softeners, hedges) 780 860 690 2 330 27.1 Indirectness and Mitigation 610 720 540 1 870 21.7 Irony and Humour 420 360 290 1 070 12.4 Respectful Address 280 240 200 720 8.4 Total Posts Analysed 9 500 9 000 9 000 27 500 100 Note: Frequencies represent coded occurrences of politeness markers within the 27 500-post corpus (approx. 1.9 million words). Percentages are rounded to one decimal place. Politeness strategies occur frequently across the three activist movements, illustrating how campaigners balance persuasion with social harmony. Positive politeness, exemplified in expressions such as “we stand together” or “let us keep fighting” , conveys solidarity and shared purpose. Negative politeness, typically expressed through hedging forms like “perhaps we should consider” or “it seems necessary to rethink” , minimizes imposition and acknowledges differing viewpoints. Indirectness and mitigation appear in phrases such as “I believe change begins with listening” , signalling cautious commitment while avoiding direct confrontation. Irony and humour, as in “sure, ignoring injustice has always solved problems” , allow critique without overt hostility, softening the force of dissent. A distinct category is respectful address , where users explicitly recognise others through forms such as “sir,” “friends,” or “dear community.” This device constructs a courteous tone and strengthens inclusivity in spaces often characterised by tension. Although it accounts for only about eight percent of occurrences, its pragmatic function is significant: it enhances credibility and reinforces mutual respect among participants. Taken together, these findings show that politeness operates as a dynamic pragmatic strategy in digital activism. It not only mitigates potential conflict but also sustains cooperative dialogue within diverse online publics. Table 4 Frequency of Politeness Strategies in Digital Activism Politeness Strategy Black Lives Matter Me Too Extinction Rebellion Total Frequency Hedges 40 30 45 115 Mitigators 55 40 50 145 Inclusive Language 110 95 85 290 Respectful Address 50 60 45 155 Hedges and Mitigators The extensive use of hedging linguistic devices such as using words like perhaps, maybe and mitigation strategies like using phrases like I believe, it seems reveals that the activists tend to use language softening strategies to avoid or prevent the possibilities of a face threatening act. The phenomenon appears to be particularly strong in the framework of the MeToo movement, where there must be an urgent need of delicacy and caution with the touchy subject of sexual harassment. Inclusive Language In all three movements, the usage of inclusive language stands out in great use, with the most common ones being witnessed by BlackLivesMatter. Slogans such as we are in this together and our voices as well as slogans such as let us pull together are used in efforts to create a sense of togetherness and the communal nature of these movements. Inclusive language leads to the greater importance of establishing a highly inclusive and supportive community within online spaces. The high rates of politeness approaches in Online activism confirm the intention to create diverse communities and reach a high range of participants, without contributing to the formation of divisions. 4.4. Speech Acts: Directives, Expressives, and Commissives The speech acts of being central to causing action and serving as an expression of unity is central in trying to understand the communicative methodologies that digital activists use. Some types of speech acts that are frequently deployed by activists include directive speech acts (e.g. calls to act), expressive speech acts (e.g. statements of solidarity), and commissive speech acts (e.g. promises to continue their fight). Table 5 Frequency of Speech Acts in Digital Activism Speech Act Type Black Lives Matter Me Too Extinction Rebellion Total Frequency Directives 125 110 130 365 Expressives 95 75 90 260 Commissives 45 40 55 140 Declaratives 50 35 40 125 Directives Directive speech act is remarkably high, which rather demonstrates the strong emphasis on mobilization and mass action in the context of individual activism within the digital sphere. These identifiably, in its demonstrations, BlackLivesMatter and Extinction Rebellion continuously use imperative features to encourage their followers to take an active role in challenging through signing petitions, conducting protests, and petitioning lawmakers. Expressives These include expressive utterances and include statements of allegiance and mutual dissatisfaction common in digital activism. These are linguistic elements that are intended towards creating an emotional hook to the audience, creating a feeling of unity within the movement. Commissives Commissive pronouncements are less common but are very essential in building commitment and faith among activists. Vows to continue with the fight or achieve justice give the activists commitment to the cause that provides continuation of activities despite challenges. The category declaratives includes statements that bring about social change through their performance, such as “We declare our solidarity” or “This is our stand.” Although less frequent, these utterances are essential in reinforcing group legitimacy and public commitment. The specified observations highlight how strategic use of speech acts allows digital activists to manage their relationship with audiences, maintain their involvement, and motivate collaborative projects. 4.5. Indirect Communication and Censorship Navigation In light of the limitations imposed by digital media, including algorithmic moderation, content filtering, character limits, and surveillance of politically sensitive material, activists often employ indirect communicative strategies to bypass censorship mechanisms and preserve their ability to connect and share information across platforms. The present analysis examines various forms of indirect communication, including the use of irony, euphemistic expressions, and similes, which activists employ as effective strategies to bypass surveillance and overcome algorithmic constraints. Table 6 Frequency of Indirect Communication Strategies in Digital Activism Indirect Communication Strategy Black Lives Matter Me Too Extinction Rebellion Total Frequency Irony 20 15 25 60 Euphemism 35 30 40 105 Humor 15 10 20 45 Subversive Language 25 20 30 75 Irony and Subversive Language Proponents of each of these movements use variations of irony and subversive language to raise voices of opposition without making their statements direct challenges to existing authorities and subjects to being moderated by content moderators of different mediums. Examples include the sarcastic use of hashtags such as #ThisIsNotOkay or #TheFutureIsNow , which function as acts of dissent but often remain undetected by automated filtering systems. The categories irony and subversive language were merged, as both rely on indirect criticism and implicit dissent to challenge dominant narratives. Posts such as “Sure, equality can wait another century” or “Saving the planet sounds radical now, doesn’t it?” exemplify this strategy of ironic defiance. Euphemism Demonstrators tend to opt for less aggressive, replacement words to remove the barb of ideas loaded with a political spin and, thus, get through the filters applied by social media monitors in their provision of the reference and subject matter. Humor An aptly placed joke can crack an otherwise closed conversation, allowing organizers to prod at sensitive areas, relieve stress in an audience, and keep audiences scrolling rather than sliding. The critique is often expressed through subtle humor, indirect remarks, and creative phrasing, which helps the writers address sensitive issues even when automated moderation systems monitor dissenting voices. The general project has started to measure the combination of how framing decisions, politeness acts, illocutionary acts, and subtle hints collaborate to guide discussion in the cyber world. By carefully staging their diction, movements and organizations such as Black Lives Matter, Me Too, Extinction Rebellion or their variations can create instances of familiarity, connect unacquainted people, and entice a third-party person into the movement. Important findings contain the next bullet point: Framing imparts a horizon of possibility so late-night scrollers can see an injustice, name it and implement a course of action within minutes after that mental change happens. In online discussion forums, invitations that are free of rudeness are commonly perceived as an instigator of a friendly environment; this courtesy helps alleviate feelings of loneliness, and is often attributed to extending the life of online movements. Speech acts, especially compelling requests, in that same context lead to concrete action and a public declaration of political wishes, whereas statements of feeling, together with promises, create emotional connections and intensify grass-root devotion. By resting on innuendo, activists neither draw the attention of investigating agents nor the platform keepers that filter or absorb whatever they deem. Thus, important messages reach preferred destinations with their desired impact. Initial investigations into these patterns all come to report the same: that language online is not a bland conveyor of facts; it quietly rewrites power maps, courts allies in, and puts vested powers off-balance. 5. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION The corpus analysis findings show that there is no doubt about the quantitative and qualitative trends in the application of the pragmatic strategies in the three chosen movements Black Lives Matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion. As the data provided in Tables 1 – 6 show, framing and politeness are most often used strategies with framing and politeness taking about a third of all the identified instances. Such tactics make activists express moral positioning, provide expression of solidarity, and engage people. The quantitative predominance of framing is in line with the previous studies that stress the role of linguistic structuring to specify the perception of the masses and the urge to act in a moral online activism (Papacharissi, 2015; Castells, 2012). Framing strategies are usually manifested in the form of assertive and emotionally intense phrases like “ Silence is complicity or we deserve a world in which breathing is not a privilege . These expressions make the audience morally active participants and form social responsibility as a social value. However, politeness strategies, on the contrary, help to preserve unity and reduce possible conflict in online conversations. The examples of the previous attempts to remain civic and inclusive even at the time when we have to discuss the controversial issues include such phrases as Let us rethink how we respond and We stand together. The pragmatic persuasion and empathy balance is also elicited by the speech act distribution. The emotional reciprocity is created by the messages such as Join the movement, Speak up for justice , and the messages such as Thank you for standing strong . The less frequent forms of declaratives like, We declare our solidarity reveal how the activists use the performative language to prove their positioning and reinforce group identity. These findings indicate that pragmatic strategies are applicable in two different ways and aim at two things simultaneously mobilizing collective action and enhancing relational trust in online communities. Politeness and mitigation devices also indicate subtle lingo negotiation. Claims are pacified with hedges of claims ( maybe, perhaps, it seems ), which are rather discussed than dispelled on the spot, particularly on controversial threads. The trend has caused the emergence of a perception that online activism is confrontational but conversational in nature and will be pragmatically toned down to ensure a long-term engagement. Moreover, the indirect and ironic form analysis shows that the activists do it intentionally when using the forms of resistance in humour and wit such as, Sure, denying climate change has worked so well so far. These words are not obvious and help to avoid the algorithmic identifications and censorship and still sound convincing. The group experience is also the focus of the campaign MeToo because the slogans are emotional such as we belong together and our voices matter. These expressions foster collaboration among the members and this makes individuals to find their membership within a larger community. This implies that the discourse acquires a more personal, rather than a strictly political connotation and this increases the persuasive power of discourse. Among the movements that are going to be discussed in this paper is the Extinction Rebellion, which tends to ask its target audience a recurring question What kind of world do we want to leave to our children? These questions which are repeated gradually widen the involvement of the masses and make citizens feel that climatic devastation is not a far-off problem but an actual one. However, as the observers of the live feeds observe, this rhetorical device is used to remind the audience that the chosen words with the necessary emphasis will help to rebrand a crisis, inspire the spectators and ultimately hold governments accountable. In such circles, politeness is not a formality, academics caution that the digital tent is an extension of civil communication that offers the feeling of true belonging. The fresh examination of the patterns of the protest speech indicated that explicit and implicit performative speech are equally efficient in attracting people and ensuring their greater emotional involvement in a cause. Such calls as Join the protest, or Sign the petition present a reader with a range of specific socially-shareable actions, whereas a statement like We need you now gets rid of hesitations. Black Lives Matter leaders used these simple appeals to remarkable success, using the repetition of social media to transform ordinary users into volunteers on the ground. Comparatively, Black Lives Matter relies heavily on framing and directives to mobilize urgency, Me Too prioritizes politeness and expressives to nurture solidarity, and Extinction Rebellion frequently uses irony and subversive tone to critique authority. Such movement-specific variations validate that pragmatic strategies are modified to fit ideological aims of every movement and communicative conditions. In general, the results indicate that the pragmatic strategies are not individual linguistic decisions, but integrated communicative actions, which combine rhetorical power with interpersonal sensitivity. They can help an activist to strike the balance between emotional high-tone and tactic politeness to make sure that their message is made available, convincing, and ethically based. 6. CONCLUSION The research paper indicates the influence of pragmatic approaches on the linguistics of digital activism. The study through corpus-based analysis determines repetitive communicative patterns that characterize the mobilization of action, empathetic expression, and social meaning negotiation by online movements. Combining corpus linguistics and pragmatic theory, the paper provides an evidence-based interpretation of how vernacular language turns to be used as a means of digital resistance and group activism. The study measures the actual web talk, posting, and arguing by the activists of the black lives matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion campaigns. It highlights the mostly more mundane functions of creating a story, building an audience, performing and evades the daily limitations that platforms possess. The gearing switch towards easy speech patterns explains why this is the language, either ordinary or not, that will be the first-line of defense against the surveillance and Internet censorship. This paper advances a discussion by contextualizing the practical choreography of digital protest, and locating everyday lexical selection alongside code and network topology as a determinant that guides the trajectory of contemporary mobilization. However, there should be some limitations to the interpretation of the findings. The data only covers posts in English language in the sampled social media platforms, which might limit the external validity of the findings. The future studies might broaden the research by introducing some multilingual/multimodal data (semiotic resources like images, emojis, or short video content). Longitudinal analyses would also be able to trace the development of pragmatic strategies in reaction to political and technological developments. Irrespective of these drawbacks, the paper helps to expand the corpus pragmatics research domain in ways that demonstrate the possibilities of the linguistic research to explore the principles of activism communication in the digital era. It emphasizes the effectiveness of activism on the choice of words, and their expression, and on the unspoken interactions between the practical decision making and turning ordinary speech into political action. Future research could expand this evidence to explore the discourse tools, which were applied by a wider array of social-justice movements and pay closer attention to discursive tools in terms of how they could be manipulated and manipulated by a certain historical and cultural background. The inclusion of more recent social media platforms like TikTok and YouTube would partly be highly valuable as such platforms are textual (through video) and visual at the same time, offering communication in the form of short videos. Besides content, the manner with which movement representatives re-invent their words under the strain of heightened government surveillance and the sudden termination of free speech can be one manifestation of rhetorical equalization of virtual identities. Declarations Author Contribution Author Contribution StatementA.R. conceptualized the study, conducted the corpus analysis, and wrote the main manuscript text. U.F.A. contributed to the literature review, data coding, and editing of the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding Declaration This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Ethics Declaration Not applicable. References Aarts, N. (2013). Castells, Manuel (2012). Networks of outrage and hope – social movements in the Internet age. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25 (3), 398-402. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt020 Altahmazi, T. H. (2020). Collective pragmatic acting in networked spaces: The case of #activism in Arabic and English Twitter discourse. Lingua, 239 , 102837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102837 Babazade, Y. (2025). Speech Acts and Hidden Meaning: A Journey into Pragmatics. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 2 (1), 221-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500128 Baer, H. (2018). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. In Digital feminisms (pp. 25-42): Routledge. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use : Cambridge University Press. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, C. J., & Jackson, S. J. (2016). Ask a Feminist: A Conversation with Cathy J. Cohen on Black Lives Matter, Feminism, and Contemporary Activism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41 (4), 775-792. doi:10.1086/685115 Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Ghobadi, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2024). Creating collaboration: How social movement organizations shape digital activism to promote broader social change. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 25 (3), 781-803. doi:10.17705/1jais.00847 Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience [Harvard University Press]. Retrieved Greene, L. (2019). Talking about black lives matter and# metoo. Wis. JL Gender, & Soc'y, 34 , 109. Grice, H. P. (1990). 1975 logic and conversation. The Philosophy of Language . Grice, H. P., Cole, P., & Morgan, J. L. (1975). Speech Acts. In Logic and Conversation (pp. 41-58): Brill. Jackson, S. J., & Banaszczyk, S. (2016). Digital Standpoints:Debating Gendered Violence and Racial Exclusions in the Feminist Counterpublic. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 40 (4), 391-407. doi:10.1177/0196859916667731 Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ley, B. L., & Brewer, P. R. (2018). Social Media, Networked Protest, and the March for Science. Social Media + Society, 4 (3), 2056305118793407. doi:10.1177/2056305118793407 Manning, N. (1998). Patterns of environmental movements in eastern Europe. Environmental Politics, 7 (2), 100-133. doi:10.1080/09644019808414395 Matthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics:An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56 (3), 247-259. doi:10.1177/0002764211426324 Mendenhall, E., Kamau, L. W., Kenworthy, N., & Bosire, E. N. (2025). Digital activism in Kenya: moving from the digital center to the digital periphery of Long Covid experience. Globalization and Health, 21 (1), 33. doi:10.1186/s12992-025-01120-9 Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women's Studies, 25 (2), 236-246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318 Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media: The Case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media + Society, 4 (4), 2056305118807911. doi:10.1177/2056305118807911 Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter. Social media+ society, 4 (4), 2056305118807911. Nhedzi, A., & Azionya, C. M. (2025). The digital activism of marginalized South African gen z in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12 (1), 362. doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04535-2 Olajimbiti, E. O. (2025). Deontic Modality and Evaluation of Obligations in Children-related X (Twitter) Interactions. Corpus Pragmatics, 9 (3), 247-268. doi:10.1007/s41701-025-00188-3 Page, S. (2019). “A machine masquerading as a movement”: The 2015 UK general election labour campaign investigated through assemblage and affect. Political Geography, 70 , 92-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.02.004 Papacharissi, Z., & Blasiola, S. (2015). Structures of Feeling, Storytelling, and Social Media. In (pp. 211-222). Park, C. S. (2015). Book review: Manuel Castells, Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet Age. Mobile Media & Communication, 3 (1), 146-147. doi:10.1177/2050157914550578a Ranger, G. (2015). Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. xviii + 461. English Language and Linguistics, 19 (3), 544-552. doi:10.1017/S1360674315000234 Rangsarittikun, R. (2025). From (a)Wake to Woke to Anti-Woke: A Diachronic Analysis of the Evolution of Discourse About ‘Woke’ Through the Hashtag #Woke on X. Corpus Pragmatics, 9 (3), 225-245. doi:10.1007/s41701-025-00189-2 Richardson, B. J. (2020). From student strikes to the extinction rebellion: New protest movements shaping our future : Edward Elgar Publishing. Roy, R. K. (2019). Online Activism, Social Movements and Mediated Politics in Contemporary Bangladesh. Society and Culture in South Asia, 5 (2), 193-215. doi:10.1177/2393861719836296 Schneider, J. (2022). Chapter 9. Three German discourse particles as speech act modifiers. In A. Xabier, E. Arantzazu, & M. Sergio (Eds.), Discourse Particles (pp. 229-254): John Benjamins Publishing Company. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language : Cambridge University Press. Shah, V., Sivitanides, M., & Mehta, M. (2013). The era of digital activism. International Journal of Information Technology, Communications and Convergence, 2 (4), 295-307. doi:10.1504/ijitcc.2013.059409 Terkourafi, M. (2012). Politeness and pragmatics. In K. Allan & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 617-637). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Trnavac, R., & Põldvere, N. (2024). Investigating Appraisal and the Language of Evaluation in Fake News Corpora. Corpus Pragmatics, 8 (2), 107-130. doi:10.1007/s41701-023-00162-x Verschueren, J. (1997). Understanding Pragmatics : Arnold. Zhou, Z., & Wang, D. (2023). Review of Models of Modals: from Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics to Machine Learning Ilse Depraetere, Bert Cappelle, Martin Hilpert, Ludovic De Cuypere, Mathieu Dehouck, Pascal Denis, Susanne Flach, Natalia Grabar, Cyril Grandin, Thierry Hamon, Clemens Hufeld, Benoît Leclercq and Hans-Jörg Schmid, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, 2023 (Hardback), ISBN: 978-3-11-073861-2. Corpus Pragmatics, 7 (3), 297-302. doi:10.1007/s41701-023-00150-1 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7980722","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":542487911,"identity":"5dae1c1b-b51d-45eb-b682-b38707d866ef","order_by":0,"name":"AHMAD RAZA","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Education","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"AHMAD","middleName":"","lastName":"RAZA","suffix":""},{"id":542487912,"identity":"41217cf6-e52e-4820-b431-f351d656fd63","order_by":1,"name":"Urooj Fatima Alvi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Education","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Urooj","middleName":"Fatima","lastName":"Alvi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-29 14:08:19","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7980722/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7980722/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":95632601,"identity":"65363a52-8717-4622-af06-a4daed2e9c9e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":471058,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"CorpusPragmaticsinDigitalManuscript.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/6fa26769121b9e843a4d4cdb.docx"},{"id":95632598,"identity":"0ef8565c-4c53-47ba-a37f-0bbaa5ba7ca4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":4824,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"b2a7a945d82c4dc29746c490e3f5b8c5.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/7e599bb294ae2b493d096a00.json"},{"id":95632605,"identity":"7ccbc743-13f0-4ec5-99a0-cf718e955f6a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":105482,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"b2a7a945d82c4dc29746c490e3f5b8c51enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/8046640151a162efd5225004.xml"},{"id":95632604,"identity":"d7c625c2-8eda-4921-ba22-b088e80c86a6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":133228,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/e787aabfc5c3a2be3e6ec082.png"},{"id":95658191,"identity":"9d33d78e-daad-4cd3-883a-84924e366216","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:23:37","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":45565,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/6f4136c5b31b6cf3b294289e.png"},{"id":95632603,"identity":"f414d26a-6fde-4c0a-9627-1e2e89d174fd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":70901,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/0a93de579a92f1d97a8dfaac.png"},{"id":95632608,"identity":"33890f88-8094-4e22-81c5-c799a61c5799","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":105050,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/4d1fe5f1b2251e30229249c6.png"},{"id":95656663,"identity":"4fd742c1-de0d-4380-9729-ddbd01bdc39e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:19:16","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":40784,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/c228e8b131ed5207b8dd2e19.png"},{"id":95632614,"identity":"a08b2092-e376-4fcf-9895-282ace81f9ff","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":25031,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/de32249ac23d7f747dfb592c.png"},{"id":95658030,"identity":"61779925-9b46-476d-8910-f531b85a3e7c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:42","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":43652,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/84fa8f47e030a0a55bb220a9.png"},{"id":95632609,"identity":"ae088551-8abc-477e-b4cc-daf0a2a78d9b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":65349,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/d5a4735e58f40e24fdb624c1.png"},{"id":95658080,"identity":"6bd1aa2d-5db8-47ec-aaa3-647fa72151b0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:53","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":33996,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/30fd164c06b81857c96799f4.png"},{"id":95632611,"identity":"005216c6-22a5-476b-a992-f1f26bb5f603","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":37803,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/18ae7c50ed67aa215187f454.png"},{"id":95632612,"identity":"dcac3a8e-ee4a-4b09-9d89-c56022c3fff6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"xml","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":103962,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"b2a7a945d82c4dc29746c490e3f5b8c51structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/78776e69700b084b1dda7726.xml"},{"id":95632615,"identity":"0d549e54-9d19-4337-893b-72fe5fd4b03e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"html","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":111736,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/49f2bf28be8cc2b1f3e7ec17.html"},{"id":95657165,"identity":"e5e104f6-9473-4cd9-a865-be8bc532ff39","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:20:11","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":154040,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eRelative Frequency of Pragmatic Strategies in Activist Movements\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/d127ff102d116f5b58e8fdde.png"},{"id":95656464,"identity":"187b57a1-e721-42c1-a286-27af080e53e7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:18:45","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":45565,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Framing Devices in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/ee2175a399b52e2a9616a033.png"},{"id":95632596,"identity":"b0b81712-0f73-49dd-a1e4-543745c51109","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:48:45","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":70901,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eDistribution of Politeness Strategies across Movements\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/89242a26f95c59e8af98a3a2.png"},{"id":95657882,"identity":"30e0ff62-0198-4005-80e1-46a2b28dfba9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:19","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":105050,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Politeness Strategies in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/86fc563efdff94837c59b986.png"},{"id":95657936,"identity":"a32d7aeb-a946-49cf-97c3-bbaae0e2e204","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:27","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":40784,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Indirect Communication Strategies in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/9a6801c3d611f5553cb13244.png"},{"id":99789584,"identity":"983c1b88-778b-4470-9904-f311ffc739f5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-08 12:50:02","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1818461,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7980722/v1/f91b2450-29ab-4a23-9ac9-ea15458785f5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Pragmatic Strategies in Digital Activism: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Language Use in Social Justice Movements","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn recent years, digital platforms have become central to the success of social justice movements, offering activists unprecedented opportunities to organize, advocate, and mobilize on a global scale (Rangsarittikun, 2025). The BlackLivesMatter movement, the MeToo movement, the Extinction Rebellion movement, and many others, have leveraged the strength of digital platforms like X (which was named Twitter) and Instagram and Facebook to oppose the established power structures, inform about systemic problems, and assemble diverse groups of followers ( Marcia Mundt, Karen Ross, \u0026amp; Charla M. Burnett, 2018).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, these movements succeed not only because of the messages they deliver but also because of the strategic application of language, which is critically important in influencing the discourse of people and mobilizing them into collective action (Greene, 2019).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe language of such movements is not only used to place issues into perspective but also to create emotional responses, construct collective identities, and act, and this is an essential component of their success (Richardson, 2020)\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAs the digital activism develops further, the linguistic and pragmatic perspective taken in them acquires an increasingly greater importance (Olajimbiti, 2025). Scholars have poured over the slogans, memes, and hashtags that crowd a timeline, yet surprisingly little attention has landed on the day-to-day talk between activists and the followers who tap SHARE. That conversation, and its occasional misfire, is exactly what pragmatics the study of language roots itself in context promise to illuminate. Drawing on a digital corpus built from multiple movements, the present study examined replies within the corpus, quotes, and threaded threads to map the linguistic tricks activists use to frame problems, forge connections, push people into the street, and sidestep obstacles such as state surveillance and platform censorship.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhy linger on these small verbal moves? They matter because they show how words can knit strangers into a crowd, deflect hostile readers, and keep a cause alive when attention drifts. By focusing on BlackLivesMatter, MeToo, and Extinction Rebellion, the research offers a fresh test case for corpus pragmatics and, just maybe, helps explain how tweets and posts sometimes nudge entire societies toward change.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn this research, the researcher will study the role of modern activists in framing their problems, mobilizing politeness moves, performing performative speech acts, and merging direct and indirect talk to social media. It is aimed at tracking how these language preferences continue to imbalance power dynamics, initiate social transformation, and precondition the popular discourse. The conclusions are supposed to help movement leaders write stinging posts, to avoid the pitfalls of the online, and to win the attention of the readers in the long term. It is also a contribution of this research to the growing body of corpus pragmatics that they can test their methods of analysis on large, publicly accessible conversation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work makes pragmatic approaches its central analytical point. These strategies are called the strategic language and contextual decisions that speakers make in order to produce certain communicative objectives in a conversation in the sphere of pragmatics (Levinson, 1983; Verschueren, 1997). In digital activism, the practices of pragmatic strategies as language modalities comprise the framing of issues, expression of support or opposition, negotiation of meaning, and continuity of engagement within online communities by the activist. Such strategies come in the form of framing, politeness and speech acts which are both expressive and persuasive.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThrough analyzing such strategies on massive amounts of data on activist discourse, this paper aims at revealing the ways in which every day, ordinary linguistic decisions provoke a wider process of mobilization and social consciousness online.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eObjectives\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe present study aimed to examine how digital activists strategically employ language in social justice movements. First, it investigated the framing strategies used to shape public perception and engage wider audiences, with particular attention to how such frames challenge or reinforce dominant narratives. Second, it analyzed the deployment of politeness strategies and solidarity markers that enable activists to construct inclusive communities and foster collective participation. A further objective was to explore the role of speech acts particularly directives and expressives in motivating individuals to take action and reinforcing commitment within activist discourse. Finally, the study sought to identify the use of indirect communicative strategies, such as irony and euphemism, which allow activists to circumvent platform restrictions while maintaining the effectiveness of their messages.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eResearch Questions\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGuided by these objectives, the study addressed the following research questions. It asked how digital activists frame social justice issues in their discourse, and what role these frames play in contesting dominant power structures. It further investigated which politeness strategies and solidarity markers are employed to build supportive and inclusive online communities within activist movements. Another question focused on the role of speech acts, particularly directives and expressives, in sustaining the success of digital activism by motivating participation and encouraging collective action. Finally, the study examined how indirect communication strategies, including irony and euphemism, are used to evade censorship and enhance the reach of activist messages.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study improves our knowledge of the ways digital activists employ pragmatic approaches to reach their audiences and negotiate the politics of digital environments. In this research paper, the expression pragmatic strategies is employed at all times to refer to communicative practices which help activists convey position, establish solidarity, and produce persuasion. Other terms which refer to communicative acts or techniques are construed on this same model in the interests of conceptual coherence. This study adds to the existing literature on digital activism and pragmatics by examining the linguistic aspects of the activist discourse. More so, it also provides valuable information on how language can be used to effect social change in the digital era, and how this may apply to future research and the digital activism practice itself.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Literature Review","content":"\u003cp\u003eDigital activism, which has emerged due to the mass adoption of social media platforms, has altered the mode of social movement communication, mobilization, and their means to demand social change (Mendenhall, Kamau, Kenworthy, \u0026amp; Bosire, 2025). The role of online platforms as a means of activism has been examined by scholars, particularly how such movements as Black Lives Matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion use online platforms to propagate their message, find support, and pressure the current power regimes. As much as there is a good stock of academic literature that has been based around the subject matter of digital activism, minimal research has been done on how viable strategies can be used to enhance the success of activist communication. This review of the existing literature, which captures the theory behind this study, tries to fill this gap by conducting a review of the existing literature that characterizes digital activism, linguistic strategies, and pragmatics.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.1. Digital Activism and Language\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eDigital activism refers to an online communication strategy employed in promoting social, political or environmental change (Nhedzi \u0026amp; Azionya, 2025). The importance of language in the process should not be underestimated as it defines collective identities, mobilizes the masses, and manifests ideological standpoints on the digital arena. Activism online discourse is not merely the information sharing space but also a negotiation space, in which meaning, power, and solidarity are constantly being produced. Other researchers like Aarts (2013); Park (2015); Page (2019), and Papacharissi and Blasiola (2015) have put forward the focus on how language is used in digital spaces and how those who get involved in the digital space approach the concept of agency and urgency as applied to social causes. This interdependence between digital activism and language thus offers the basis on which the effect of the pragmatic strategies can be realized in the context of activist communication.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe concept of digital activism as broadened by Ghobadi and Sonenshein (2024) and by Ley and Brewer (2018) defined as the application of digital media, in particular, social media, to mobilize and champion the change in the society, political, or environmental processes. The use of social media application like X (previously twitter), Facebook and Instagram have become important tools of modern activism as it connects globally and allows the formation of a real-time interactive dialogue.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt is worth mentioning the BlackLivesMatter movement, which took advantage of such hashtags as #BlackLivesMatter to raise awareness about structural racism and police brutality and conducted protests and provided an opportunity to be heard by the mass media, which was historically silent (Cohen \u0026amp; Jackson, 2016; Marcia Mundt, Karen Ross, \u0026amp; Charla M Burnett, 2018). Similarly, MeToo movement took advantage of the hashtags of #MeToo to circulate issues of sexual misconduct and they formed a virtual circle of empathy and support to those who were affected by sexual misconduct, as illustrated by Mendes, Ringrose, and Keller (2018). Such shows have also proved that the virtual arenas can be as effective in amplifying the voices of the underrepresented and bringing sweeping change to the society (Olajimbiti, 2025).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese social movements may be characterized by the use of specific language as the core issue to define what was in the representations of problems and mobilization of the followers. Framing Theory, the theory was first described by Manning (1998) and it presents an ideal perspective on the meaning-making processes of individuals and groups, which entails a selection and introduction of information in a strategic manner. Frames determine the way events and social issues are perceived by audiences by determining what gets highlighted and what gets dropped. In this research, the theory is especially relevant because it helps to understand the way in which social movements create compelling stories that shape the consciousness of people, informing their public speech.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming is particular in digital activism since activists are able to frame the social problem in ways that will attract the attention and encourage the latter to act in response (Shah, Sivitanides, \u0026amp; Mehta, 2013). The Black LivesMatter movement can be cited as an example suggesting that the issue of racial injustice is demonstrated as a systemic problem, not the acts of violence alone. MeToo, in its turn, assists in placing the issue of sexual harassment in the societal-wide context as opposed to specific instances of bad behavior (Baer, 2018).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.2. Pragmatics in Digital Activism\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003ePragmatics is the science that studies the meaning production and interpretation of language users in given social situations. When transferred to digital activism, pragmatic theory enables the researchers to investigate how the activists shape a message that is not only expressive but also leads to social action. Previous works of H. P. Grice, Cole, and Morgan (1975) on implicature and Brown and Levinson (1987) on principles of politeness demonstrate how communicative decisions are determined by the intentions of the speaker and the expectations of the listener. These theories are applied in online activism to understand how an activist is able to balance between stance, persuasion, and community building, within an algorithmic and ideological confinement. The current research is based on these findings to determine the enlightened strategies that perpetuate the activism discussion over the platforms.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLiterature on digital activism has been paying very intensive attention to content and presentation of messages. Within pragmatics, H Paul Grice (1990) stressed that, people tend to utilize language in order to communicate some forms of meaning beyond the literal meaning. As an extension of this concept, other researchers have pointed out that the most fundamental concept of pragmatics can be found in the study of the interplay between language and its social context (Zhou \u0026amp; Wang, 2023). It is equally focused in the digital activism context in the sense that the activists are confronted with the need to negotiate a number of audiences, limitations brought about by digital media, and political forces that are inherent in the latter.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming Theory, originally explained by Goffman (1974), and followed up by Manning (1998) is the manner in which individuals and groups frame perception by emphasizing some issues and minimizing others. In digital activism, framing dictates the manner in which causes are packaged in a manner that will cause empathy, rationale protest, and interest in taking action. Through the analysis of the linguistic framing process of activist talk, this paper will explain how the online movements build collective meaning and impact people to understand social issues.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn this respect Politeness Theory by Brown and Levinson (1987) is an important theory used to analyze the interaction and strategy of activists to control the interaction to avoid alienation and hold on solidarity. More precisely, it illuminates the pragmatic process according to which the internal composition of utterances is engaged with the external requirements of discourse so that speakers may achieve a balance between the assertiveness and social harmonisation in their communication.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAnother example of this phenomenon is the use of polite words, and it can be observed in the case of how MeToo movement manages to talk about sensitive issues like sexual harassment using polite tone to make people discuss it but not to offend the people who may be unsupportive or even unaware of the aims of the movement. The political use of politeness strategies thus allows creating an atmosphere of camaraderie and inclusiveness, which are more than essential to the success of the effort of online activism.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBesides, Speech Act Theory, which was proposed by Austin (1962) and advanced by Searle (1969), provides such a theoretical framework when analyzing the use of language by activist groups as implementation of certain actions. Directives, commissives, and expressives, which constitute speech acts, are significant in the process of triggering participation and cultivating solidarity in the context of digital activism (Schneider, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of the ways is through directives, where supporters are encouraged to take practical actions in order to support a cause by signing a petition or joining a protest. Commissives which move in a similar line like pledges or a promise also help beef up the causes of the movement and carry along long term participation. Through expressive speech acts, the activists are able to describe unity and sharing of common emotional experiences, thus a sense of shared identity and shared goals can be developed (Babazade, 2025).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe structures of the framing theory, politeness theory, and speech act theory have supplied profound concepts into the world of digital activism. Despite that, most of the previous studies have been limited to qualitative content-based analysis which focuses on the surface dimensions of the messages posted in social media (Trnavac \u0026amp; P\u0026otilde;ldvere, 2024). One of the gaps present with regard to existing literature relates to the assessment of corpus linguistics in the research of digital activism.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.3. Corpus Pragmatics and Digital Activism\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eCorpus Linguistics offers systematic tools for studying language through large collections of authentic texts. It allows researchers to discover frequency, collocation and association patterns of words, which demonstrate tendencies within discourse (Biber, Conrad, \u0026amp; Reppen, 1998). These methods come in particularly handy in the study of digital communication where computing data with a large amount of data required to be processed. Based on the definition presented by Ranger (2015), the term Corpus Pragmatics can be explained as a mixture of the corpus-based methods and pragmatic interpretation that is to be employed to explore the issue of meaning creation and negotiation within the setting. It is a combination of quantitative accuracy and qualitative insight, and it allows the researcher to take note of the functions of such pragmatic phenomena of speech acts, politeness, and framing in bulk data set. This mixed framework is the foundation of the analysis of activist language in the current research that ensures that the two frequency patterns and the contextual interpretation of the activist language are considered.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCorpus pragmatics, which offers a promising direction of the analysis of the use of language in the context of digital activism, is one of the latest interdisciplinary areas that combine corpus linguistics and the theory of pragmatics (Terkourafi, 2012). Although the use of corpus linguistics is a relatively advanced branch of research in such spheres like applied linguistics and discourse analysis, the role of such a method in exploring digital activism remains a relatively untapped domain.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe quantitative approach to the analysis of the key terms and hashtags is the primary focus of the study of digital activism based on the corpus-based approach, yet it does not presuppose the systematic search of the instrumental aspect of the linguistic exploitation. For instance, the role of hashtags such as #BlackLivesMatter as instruments of protest and online resistance has been examined (Jackson \u0026amp; Banaszczyk, 2016). However, most of such studies are more inclined to ignore the pragmatic aspects of such communication including elements of framing, politeness strategies, and performative speech act. This intellectual gap highlights the need to have a more detailed analysis of the practical uses of language in the sphere of digital activism.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.4. Identified Gaps in the Literature\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe body of research in digital activism has grown significantly over the past few years, but little has been done in terms of looking at how activists are able to build out their messages in a consecutive and strategic way. The research on the contents of communication or the political environment at large is done and the pragmatic machineries underlying are not examined in detail. Altahmazi (2020) reviewed such hashtags as BlackLivesMatter as a solidarity tool and collective identity, and Roy (2019) studied the position and aggression in online communication.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn spite of the fact that these works provide us with the valuable knowledge on the linguistic knowledge of digital activism, they seldom explore the communicative processes involved step by step by which activists would construct and negotiate meaning. This dimension is the central concern of the present study. On a similar note, corpus linguistics-toolkits which are used to mine large bodies of language have barely been applied to activist locations, so small-scale anecdotal reports still predominate.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study investigates the underexplored intersection of corpus linguistics and pragmatic analysis within the context of digital activism. Focusing on campaigns like BlackLivesMatter, MeToo, and Extinction Rebellion, it poses the question of how activists package their messages, negotiate politeness, give performative instructions, and perform indirectly in online spaces that move quickly. It is especially concerned with the way in which such linguistic moves assist in the mobilisation of support and pressure against established power.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, much of the existing literature focuses mainly on visible elements such as hashtags and images. The use of language itself which is structured by rules and how this influences the construction and reception of messages has gotten a lot less focus. This work provides a fresh insight into the process of turning the ordinary speech into the potent tool of social change through the pragmatic characteristics of the activist discourse as a corpus and studying its different aspects. The project will be targeting a two-disciplinary connection that is not usually common.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe existing analysis uses corpus-based approaches to recognize and analyse the pragmatic strategies that are applied by campaigners in their attempts to create online support.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.1. Corpus Creation and Data Collection\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe current research was developed on the purpose-constructed digital activism corpus, which gathers publicly available posts on the most popular social media, such as X (former Twitter), Facebook, and Instagram. The corpus was created to reflect the lingual activity of three movements known all over the world: Black Lives Matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion. The data were collected based on publicly available posts, which specifically used the official hashtags of the movements (e.g. #BlackLivesMatter, #MeToo, #ExtinctionRebellion) or other thematic keywords related to social justice, equality, and environmental activism.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe total amount of the posts gathered during 2018\u0026ndash;2023 is 27,500 posts and it contains around 1.9\u0026nbsp;million words. Keywords were used in sampling posts by a combination of manual or automated process. All the records in the dataset are the original content, the date of the publications, the user handle (anonymized), the number of reactions or shares, and other metadata available including hashtags and emojis. All user identifiable details were eliminated so as to preserve user privacy so that only randomly generated numbers were used to identify the post.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe data were filtered using the posts that were in English language, and the non-textual data like videos or photos with no text accompanying it were eliminated. Single textual units were considered when users made threads or multi-post messages to maintain the continuity of discourse. This methodology enables the analysis to get individual utterances and long arguing common with online activism.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA balanced sampling was used to have the platforms represented: half in X, 30 on Facebook and 20 on Instagram. The resulting corpus was manipulated in Python (3.11) with the use of libraries like pandas to clean up the data, spaCy to tokenize and lemmatize the data, and NLTK to analyze frequency and collocations. The Sketch Engine was able to support additional pragmatic tagging through manual verification to ensure context-sensitive patterns.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSuch a detailed description of corpus composition and metadata allows recreating the analysis and using it as a valid foundation, which can be ensured to ensure the given analysis will be conducted on a clear and verifiable set of data.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2. Pragmatic Annotation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA body of text that resulted was annotated with a series of pragmatic cues that indicated how the users used language as a tool of digital activism. There are three coding categories that are created.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2.1. Framing Devices:\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdopting Entman (1993) schema, the annotation will tag metaphors, emotional appeals, and rhetorical questions that recast social-justice stories in ways designed to unsettle prevailing frames (Matthes, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2.2. Politeness Strategies:\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn line with the taxonomy of Brown and Levinson (1987), we will find hedging words, types of mitigations and inclusive pronouns that can be used by speakers to save face at the same time demand a change. This discussion strives to demonstrate how activists balance empathy to the emotions of the audience and the need to advocate forcefully.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2.3. Speech Acts\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eEach online text will be analyzed in terms of the basic illocutionary acts as discussed by Searle (1969) such as directives that call upon people to perform an action, expressives that reveal personal feelings, and commissives that show commitment to doing something in future. Through listing these primitive orders, permissions, pledges, the study will attempt to dig up the use of verbal trickery by activists to hook followers and create a sense of trust on newly basis.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2.4. Indirect Communication Strategies\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWith more and more direct complaints being recorded through automated systems, activists are more subtle in their forms of expression, which this paper examines: irony that compels the reader to wink back, dulled dissent with soft edges through euphemism, and masking outrage behind laughter: punchline humor. These way-around statements allow the organizers to avoid scrapers and moderators and leave the audience alert to the implicit rebellion.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.3. Data Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe analysis of the corpus is carried out in two stages of overlapping, one quantitative and the other qualitative and is interwoven in a manner that none of them prevails in the description.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3.1. Quantitative Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e: Software packages like AntConc and WordSmith crunch digits, counting how often frames repeat, how politeness shifts by platform, and when indirect hints outpace blunt statements. Raw frequency patterns provide an initial outline of the dialect used within each movement, revealing which communicative moves gain or lose prominence in large-scale message streams.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e3.3.2. Qualitative Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e: Once the quantitative findings have been received, close scrutiny of the texts shall be implemented in an attempt to dig the contextual meanings behind the quantitative figures. The follow-up review will follow the combination of framing decisions, politeness actions, speech acts, and indirect hints to create meaning, develop trust, and influence people into action.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.4. Sampling and Data Representation\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSince the content is scraped out of public feeds, the decision of speakers is based solely on the hashtags they add to, and not on their identity. The corpus has posts of both experienced activists and newcomers to the movement, with a range of activities running between those who were enthusiastic supporters and critics and neutral observers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.5. Reliability and Validity\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn order to increase the reliability, multiple coders who are not involved in the study will be asked to annotate the same piece of text, and each one of the analysts will be working separately until results are compared. The discrepancies in the coding that will arise, will be debated until a consensus is achieved, a process that will sharpen the data as well as enhance the collective judgment of the researchers. The entire data set will be released in an open-source manner such that the external scholars can replicate the results and look at the methodological processes hence ensuring transparency and responsibility in the research process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003e3.6. Ethical Considerations\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThough the research uses social media feeds of the general population, moral restraints are still necessary. All the posts are deprived of names and handles and other identifying information in them and this enables the analysis to concentrate on word choice and not the person who wrote it. In making this pledge of de-identification and observing the laid down ethical guidelines, the researchers hope to protect the subjects against any unnecessary harm, yet access the abundant conversational data at the online level.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. ANALYSIS","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this section, the findings obtained through the corpus analysis will be explored, with a focus on the use of pragmatic strategies by the digital activists in the discussed social justice movements. In the current study, the researcher will focus on the use of framing, politeness strategies, and speech acts, and indirect communication as listed in the methodology above.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAccording to the analysis, the notion of framing can be identified as the most prominent pragmatic approach in all three movements, which occupies over a third of all instances coded. Narratives are often built in posts and highlight feelings of injustice and collective responsibility, as in the examples of the post titled as \u003cem\u003eWe deserve a world where breathing is not a privilege\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSilence is complicity\u003c/em\u003e. This set of words labels social issues as moral, which makes activism a civic responsibility among other issues and not the political option.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.1. Frequency and Distribution of Pragmatic Strategies\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Pragmatic Strategies across Movements\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePragmatic Strategy\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMe Too\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal Instances\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePercentage (%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,480\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,930\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,640\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6,050\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e33.2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePoliteness\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,620\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,850\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,420\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4,890\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e26.8\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpeech Acts\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,980\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,640\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1,310\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4,930\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e27.1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndirectness/Irony\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e820\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e750\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e640\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2,210\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTotal Texts (Posts)\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9,500\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9,000\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9,000\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e27,500\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e100\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePoliteness strategies are almost as common as framing mechanisms, and their purpose is to ensure that there is a sense of solidarity and to minimize conflict during controversial conversations. Inclusive language may be employed through the use of the plural pronoun \u003cem\u003ewe stand together\u003c/em\u003e and through the use of a more softening pronoun like \u003cem\u003elet us rethink\u003c/em\u003e by the activists to have an emotional appeal to a common perspective of respect and teamwork.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAnother visible element is the use of speech acts, especially directives and expressives. Directive action terms like \u003cem\u003eJoin us today\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSpeak up for justice\u003c/em\u003e are addressed to action and the use of expressive terms like \u003cem\u003eWe hear you\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eThank you standing strong\u003c/em\u003e create emotional appeal and empathies among the followers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLastly, the use of indirect and ironic expressions is not common, though has a major pragmatic impact. Comments made with a sense of humor or irony, like the one that states the fact that it has been working so far to ignore climate change, subtle criticizes the opposing sides without making a direct attack.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese strategies vary in intent of communication as they are distributed amongst the three movements. BlackLivesMatter applies framing and commands to build action, MeToo focuses on the expressives and politeness to provide emotional solidarity, and Extinction Rebellion applies irony and euphemism to challenge the authority by indirect means.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.2. Framing Devices in Digital Activism\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming serves as a pivotal tactic for digital activists, allowing them to present issues in ways that resonate with audiences, influence their interpretations, and motivate collective support for their cause. The prevalence of framing mechanisms employed within the body of material offers a glimpse into the methods through which movements articulate matters of social justice and contest prevailing storylines.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Framing Devices in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming Device\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMe Too\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal Frequency\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMetaphors\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e120\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e85\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e110\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e315\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEmotional Appeals\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e95\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e100\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e275\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRhetorical Questions\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e135\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCrisis Framing\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e70\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e80\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e210\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMetaphors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eMetaphorical language is also used very actively in the course of the three movements as one of the means explored by activists in making the subjects of concern to the society approachable and compelling. As an example, the Black Lives Matter movement frequently resorts to metaphors like fighting for justice in order to frame racial disparities as a conflict, uniting the followers on a common purpose.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmotional Appeals\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt is also worth emphasizing that the use of emotional appeals, especially in MeToo and Extinction rebellion is prevalent, thus it is crucial to create an emotional connection with a target audience. Involved parties of such movements use rhetoric as a tool to either arouse empathy or unhappiness or outrage, to action or to induce societal outrage to social injustices.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRhetorical Questions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eRhetorical questions, which are less frequently used than either metaphors or emotion appeals, are used tactically to make the audience consider the possibility, as well as engage in analytical thinking. The example of this is seen in the actions of the Extinction Rebellion which often asks questions like, what will be the legacy we give our descendants? with the aim to face the general indifference towards the problem of climate change.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe findings suggest that the use of framing is common in the digital activism field and that it is used to not merely craft messages, but challenge existing relations of power by restructuring issues in a way that results in the possibility of mobilization and the development of communal solidarity.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.3. Politeness Strategies and Solidarity\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAppreciation of politeness strategies such as hedging, mitigation and inclusive language is especially relevant to digital activists, who seek to foster solidarity and promote inclusive discourse. Using polite words also helps activists to attract a wide audience without the danger of alienating possible supporters or contributors.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDistribution of Politeness Strategies across Movements\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePoliteness Strategy\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMe Too\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal Instances\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePercentage (%)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePositive Politeness (inclusive appeals)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e920\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1 040\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e730\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2 690\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e31.3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNegative Politeness (softeners, hedges)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e780\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e860\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e690\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2 330\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e27.1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndirectness and Mitigation\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e610\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e720\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e540\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1 870\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e21.7\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIrony and Humour\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e420\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e360\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e290\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1 070\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eRespectful Address\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e280\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e240\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e200\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e720\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eTotal Posts Analysed\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 500\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 000\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 000\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e27 500\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e100\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003ctfoot\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eNote: Frequencies represent coded occurrences of politeness markers within the 27 500-post corpus (approx. 1.9\u0026nbsp;million words). Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tfoot\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePoliteness strategies occur frequently across the three activist movements, illustrating how campaigners balance persuasion with social harmony. Positive politeness, exemplified in expressions such as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;we stand together\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;let us keep fighting\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e, conveys solidarity and shared purpose. Negative politeness, typically expressed through hedging forms like \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;perhaps we should consider\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;it seems necessary to rethink\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e, minimizes imposition and acknowledges differing viewpoints.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndirectness and mitigation appear in phrases such as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;I believe change begins with listening\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e, signalling cautious commitment while avoiding direct confrontation. Irony and humour, as in \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;sure, ignoring injustice has always solved problems\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e, allow critique without overt hostility, softening the force of dissent.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA distinct category is \u003cb\u003erespectful address\u003c/b\u003e, where users explicitly recognise others through forms such as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;sir,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;friends,\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;dear community.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e This device constructs a courteous tone and strengthens inclusivity in spaces often characterised by tension. Although it accounts for only about eight percent of occurrences, its pragmatic function is significant: it enhances credibility and reinforces mutual respect among participants.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTaken together, these findings show that politeness operates as a dynamic pragmatic strategy in digital activism. It not only mitigates potential conflict but also sustains cooperative dialogue within diverse online publics.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Politeness Strategies in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePoliteness Strategy\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMe Too\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal Frequency\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eHedges\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e115\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMitigators\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e145\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eInclusive Language\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e110\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e95\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e85\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e290\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eRespectful Address\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e155\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHedges and Mitigators\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe extensive use of hedging linguistic devices such as using words like perhaps, maybe and mitigation strategies like using phrases like I believe, it seems reveals that the activists tend to use language softening strategies to avoid or prevent the possibilities of a face threatening act. The phenomenon appears to be particularly strong in the framework of the MeToo movement, where there must be an urgent need of delicacy and caution with the touchy subject of sexual harassment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInclusive Language\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn all three movements, the usage of inclusive language stands out in great use, with the most common ones being witnessed by BlackLivesMatter. Slogans such as \u003cem\u003ewe are in this together\u003c/em\u003e and our voices as well as slogans such as \u003cem\u003elet us pull together\u003c/em\u003e are used in efforts to create a sense of togetherness and the communal nature of these movements. Inclusive language leads to the greater importance of establishing a highly inclusive and supportive community within online spaces. The high rates of politeness approaches in Online activism confirm the intention to create diverse communities and reach a high range of participants, without contributing to the formation of divisions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.4. Speech Acts: Directives, Expressives, and Commissives\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe speech acts of being central to causing action and serving as an expression of unity is central in trying to understand the communicative methodologies that digital activists use. Some types of speech acts that are frequently deployed by activists include directive speech acts (e.g. calls to act), expressive speech acts (e.g. statements of solidarity), and commissive speech acts (e.g. promises to continue their fight).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Speech Acts in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpeech Act Type\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMe Too\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal Frequency\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDirectives\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e125\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e110\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e130\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e365\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExpressives\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e95\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e90\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e260\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eCommissives\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e55\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e140\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDeclaratives\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e125\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDirectives\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eDirective speech act is remarkably high, which rather demonstrates the strong emphasis on mobilization and mass action in the context of individual activism within the digital sphere. These identifiably, in its demonstrations, BlackLivesMatter and Extinction Rebellion continuously use imperative features to encourage their followers to take an active role in challenging through signing petitions, conducting protests, and petitioning lawmakers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExpressives\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese include expressive utterances and include statements of allegiance and mutual dissatisfaction common in digital activism. These are linguistic elements that are intended towards creating an emotional hook to the audience, creating a feeling of unity within the movement.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommissives\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eCommissive pronouncements are less common but are very essential in building commitment and faith among activists. Vows to continue with the fight or achieve justice give the activists commitment to the cause that provides continuation of activities despite challenges.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe category \u003cem\u003edeclaratives\u003c/em\u003e includes statements that bring about social change through their performance, such as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;We declare our solidarity\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;This is our stand.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e Although less frequent, these utterances are essential in reinforcing group legitimacy and public commitment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe specified observations highlight how strategic use of speech acts allows digital activists to manage their relationship with audiences, maintain their involvement, and motivate collaborative projects.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.5. Indirect Communication and Censorship Navigation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn light of the limitations imposed by digital media, including algorithmic moderation, content filtering, character limits, and surveillance of politically sensitive material, activists often employ indirect communicative strategies to bypass censorship mechanisms and preserve their ability to connect and share information across platforms. The present analysis examines various forms of indirect communication, including the use of irony, euphemistic expressions, and similes, which activists employ as effective strategies to bypass surveillance and overcome algorithmic constraints.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrequency of Indirect Communication Strategies in Digital Activism\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndirect Communication Strategy\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eMe Too\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal Frequency\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eIrony\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e60\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eEuphemism\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e35\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e105\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eHumor\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e45\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSubversive Language\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e25\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e30\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e75\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIrony and Subversive Language\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eProponents of each of these movements use variations of irony and subversive language to raise voices of opposition without making their statements direct challenges to existing authorities and subjects to being moderated by content moderators of different mediums. Examples include the sarcastic use of hashtags such as \u003cem\u003e#ThisIsNotOkay\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003e#TheFutureIsNow\u003c/em\u003e, which function as acts of dissent but often remain undetected by automated filtering systems.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe categories \u003cem\u003eirony\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003esubversive language\u003c/em\u003e were merged, as both rely on indirect criticism and implicit dissent to challenge dominant narratives. Posts such as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Sure, equality can wait another century\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Saving the planet sounds radical now, doesn\u0026rsquo;t it?\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e exemplify this strategy of ironic defiance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEuphemism\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eDemonstrators tend to opt for less aggressive, replacement words to remove the barb of ideas loaded with a political spin and, thus, get through the filters applied by social media monitors in their provision of the reference and subject matter.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHumor\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn aptly placed joke can crack an otherwise closed conversation, allowing organizers to prod at sensitive areas, relieve stress in an audience, and keep audiences scrolling rather than sliding. The critique is often expressed through subtle humor, indirect remarks, and creative phrasing, which helps the writers address sensitive issues even when automated moderation systems monitor dissenting voices.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe general project has started to measure the combination of how framing decisions, politeness acts, illocutionary acts, and subtle hints collaborate to guide discussion in the cyber world. By carefully staging their diction, movements and organizations such as Black Lives Matter, Me Too, Extinction Rebellion or their variations can create instances of familiarity, connect unacquainted people, and entice a third-party person into the movement. Important findings contain the next bullet point:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming imparts a horizon of possibility so late-night scrollers can see an injustice, name it and implement a course of action within minutes after that mental change happens.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn online discussion forums, invitations that are free of rudeness are commonly perceived as an instigator of a friendly environment; this courtesy helps alleviate feelings of loneliness, and is often attributed to extending the life of online movements.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eSpeech acts, especially compelling requests, in that same context lead to concrete action and a public declaration of political wishes, whereas statements of feeling, together with promises, create emotional connections and intensify grass-root devotion.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eBy resting on innuendo, activists neither draw the attention of investigating agents nor the platform keepers that filter or absorb whatever they deem. Thus, important messages reach preferred destinations with their desired impact.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eInitial investigations into these patterns all come to report the same: that language online is not a bland conveyor of facts; it quietly rewrites power maps, courts allies in, and puts vested powers off-balance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"5. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe corpus analysis findings show that there is no doubt about the quantitative and qualitative trends in the application of the pragmatic strategies in the three chosen movements Black Lives Matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion. As the data provided in Tables\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e show, framing and politeness are most often used strategies with framing and politeness taking about a third of all the identified instances. Such tactics make activists express moral positioning, provide expression of solidarity, and engage people. The quantitative predominance of framing is in line with the previous studies that stress the role of linguistic structuring to specify the perception of the masses and the urge to act in a moral online activism (Papacharissi, 2015; Castells, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFraming strategies are usually manifested in the form of assertive and emotionally intense phrases like \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eSilence is complicity\u003c/em\u003e or \u003cem\u003ewe deserve a world in which breathing is not a privilege\u003c/em\u003e. These expressions make the audience morally active participants and form social responsibility as a social value. However, politeness strategies, on the contrary, help to preserve unity and reduce possible conflict in online conversations. The examples of the previous attempts to remain civic and inclusive even at the time when we have to discuss the controversial issues include such phrases as \u003cem\u003eLet us rethink how we respond\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eWe stand together.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe pragmatic persuasion and empathy balance is also elicited by the speech act distribution. The emotional reciprocity is created by the messages such as \u003cem\u003eJoin the movement, Speak up for justice\u003c/em\u003e, and the messages such as \u003cem\u003eThank you for standing strong\u003c/em\u003e. The less frequent forms of declaratives like, \u003cem\u003eWe declare our solidarity\u003c/em\u003e reveal how the activists use the performative language to prove their positioning and reinforce group identity. These findings indicate that pragmatic strategies are applicable in two different ways and aim at two things simultaneously mobilizing collective action and enhancing relational trust in online communities.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePoliteness and mitigation devices also indicate subtle lingo negotiation. Claims are pacified with hedges of claims (\u003cem\u003emaybe, perhaps, it seems\u003c/em\u003e), which are rather discussed than dispelled on the spot, particularly on controversial threads. The trend has caused the emergence of a perception that online activism is confrontational but conversational in nature and will be pragmatically toned down to ensure a long-term engagement. Moreover, the indirect and ironic form analysis shows that the activists do it intentionally when using the forms of resistance in humour and wit such as, Sure, denying climate change has worked so well so far. These words are not obvious and help to avoid the algorithmic identifications and censorship and still sound convincing.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe group experience is also the focus of the campaign MeToo because the slogans are emotional such as we belong together and our voices matter. These expressions foster collaboration among the members and this makes individuals to find their membership within a larger community. This implies that the discourse acquires a more personal, rather than a strictly political connotation and this increases the persuasive power of discourse.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAmong the movements that are going to be discussed in this paper is the Extinction Rebellion, which tends to ask its target audience a recurring question \u003cem\u003eWhat kind of world do we want to leave to our children?\u003c/em\u003e These questions which are repeated gradually widen the involvement of the masses and make citizens feel that climatic devastation is not a far-off problem but an actual one. However, as the observers of the live feeds observe, this rhetorical device is used to remind the audience that the chosen words with the necessary emphasis will help to rebrand a crisis, inspire the spectators and ultimately hold governments accountable. In such circles, politeness is not a formality, academics caution that the digital tent is an extension of civil communication that offers the feeling of true belonging.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe fresh examination of the patterns of the protest speech indicated that explicit and implicit performative speech are equally efficient in attracting people and ensuring their greater emotional involvement in a cause. Such calls as Join the protest, or Sign the petition present a reader with a range of specific socially-shareable actions, whereas a statement like We need you now gets rid of hesitations. Black Lives Matter leaders used these simple appeals to remarkable success, using the repetition of social media to transform ordinary users into volunteers on the ground.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eComparatively, \u003cem\u003eBlack Lives Matter\u003c/em\u003e relies heavily on framing and directives to mobilize urgency, \u003cem\u003eMe Too\u003c/em\u003e prioritizes politeness and expressives to nurture solidarity, and \u003cem\u003eExtinction Rebellion\u003c/em\u003e frequently uses irony and subversive tone to critique authority. Such movement-specific variations validate that pragmatic strategies are modified to fit ideological aims of every movement and communicative conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn general, the results indicate that the pragmatic strategies are not individual linguistic decisions, but integrated communicative actions, which combine rhetorical power with interpersonal sensitivity. They can help an activist to strike the balance between emotional high-tone and tactic politeness to make sure that their message is made available, convincing, and ethically based.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"6. CONCLUSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe research paper indicates the influence of pragmatic approaches on the linguistics of digital activism. The study through corpus-based analysis determines repetitive communicative patterns that characterize the mobilization of action, empathetic expression, and social meaning negotiation by online movements. Combining corpus linguistics and pragmatic theory, the paper provides an evidence-based interpretation of how vernacular language turns to be used as a means of digital resistance and group activism.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study measures the actual web talk, posting, and arguing by the activists of the black lives matter, Me Too, and Extinction Rebellion campaigns. It highlights the mostly more mundane functions of creating a story, building an audience, performing and evades the daily limitations that platforms possess. The gearing switch towards easy speech patterns explains why this is the language, either ordinary or not, that will be the first-line of defense against the surveillance and Internet censorship.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis paper advances a discussion by contextualizing the practical choreography of digital protest, and locating everyday lexical selection alongside code and network topology as a determinant that guides the trajectory of contemporary mobilization.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, there should be some limitations to the interpretation of the findings. The data only covers posts in English language in the sampled social media platforms, which might limit the external validity of the findings. The future studies might broaden the research by introducing some multilingual/multimodal data (semiotic resources like images, emojis, or short video content). Longitudinal analyses would also be able to trace the development of pragmatic strategies in reaction to political and technological developments.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIrrespective of these drawbacks, the paper helps to expand the corpus pragmatics research domain in ways that demonstrate the possibilities of the linguistic research to explore the principles of activism communication in the digital era. It emphasizes the effectiveness of activism on the choice of words, and their expression, and on the unspoken interactions between the practical decision making and turning ordinary speech into political action.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFuture research could expand this evidence to explore the discourse tools, which were applied by a wider array of social-justice movements and pay closer attention to discursive tools in terms of how they could be manipulated and manipulated by a certain historical and cultural background. The inclusion of more recent social media platforms like TikTok and YouTube would partly be highly valuable as such platforms are textual (through video) and visual at the same time, offering communication in the form of short videos. Besides content, the manner with which movement representatives re-invent their words under the strain of heightened government surveillance and the sudden termination of free speech can be one manifestation of rhetorical equalization of virtual identities.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAuthor Contribution StatementA.R. conceptualized the study, conducted the corpus analysis, and wrote the main manuscript text. U.F.A. contributed to the literature review, data coding, and editing of the manuscript. Both authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding Declaration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics Declaration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAarts, N. (2013). Castells, Manuel (2012). Networks of outrage and hope \u0026ndash; social movements in the Internet age. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25\u003c/em\u003e(3), 398-402. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt020\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAltahmazi, T. H. (2020). Collective pragmatic acting in networked spaces: The case of #activism in Arabic and English Twitter discourse. \u003cem\u003eLingua, 239\u003c/em\u003e, 102837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102837\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBabazade, Y. (2025). Speech Acts and Hidden Meaning: A Journey into Pragmatics. \u003cem\u003eActa Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 2\u003c/em\u003e(1), 221-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500128\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaer, H. (2018). Redoing feminism: Digital activism, body politics, and neoliberalism. In \u003cem\u003eDigital feminisms\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 25-42): Routledge.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBiber, D., Conrad, S., \u0026amp; Reppen, R. (1998). \u003cem\u003eCorpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use\u003c/em\u003e: Cambridge University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrown, P., \u0026amp; Levinson, S. C. (1987). \u003cem\u003ePoliteness: Some Universals in Language Usage\u003c/em\u003e. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCohen, C. J., \u0026amp; Jackson, S. J. (2016). Ask a Feminist: A Conversation with Cathy J. Cohen on Black Lives Matter, Feminism, and Contemporary Activism. \u003cem\u003eSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41\u003c/em\u003e(4), 775-792. doi:10.1086/685115\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEntman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Communication, 43\u003c/em\u003e(4), 51-58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGhobadi, S., \u0026amp; Sonenshein, S. (2024). Creating collaboration: How social movement organizations shape digital activism to promote broader social change. \u003cem\u003eJournal of the Association of Information Systems, 25\u003c/em\u003e(3), 781-803. doi:10.17705/1jais.00847\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience [Harvard University Press]. Retrieved\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGreene, L. (2019). Talking about black lives matter and# metoo. \u003cem\u003eWis. JL Gender, \u0026amp; Soc\u0026apos;y, 34\u003c/em\u003e, 109.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrice, H. P. (1990). 1975 logic and conversation. \u003cem\u003eThe Philosophy of Language\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGrice, H. P., Cole, P., \u0026amp; Morgan, J. L. (1975). Speech Acts. In \u003cem\u003eLogic and Conversation\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 41-58): Brill.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJackson, S. J., \u0026amp; Banaszczyk, S. (2016). Digital Standpoints:Debating Gendered Violence and Racial Exclusions in the Feminist Counterpublic. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Communication Inquiry, 40\u003c/em\u003e(4), 391-407. doi:10.1177/0196859916667731\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLevinson, S. C. (1983). \u003cem\u003ePragmatics\u003c/em\u003e. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLey, B. L., \u0026amp; Brewer, P. R. (2018). Social Media, Networked Protest, and the March for Science. \u003cem\u003eSocial Media + Society, 4\u003c/em\u003e(3), 2056305118793407. doi:10.1177/2056305118793407\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eManning, N. (1998). Patterns of environmental movements in eastern Europe. \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Politics, 7\u003c/em\u003e(2), 100-133. doi:10.1080/09644019808414395\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMatthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics:An Integrative Approach. \u003cem\u003eAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 56\u003c/em\u003e(3), 247-259. doi:10.1177/0002764211426324\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMendenhall, E., Kamau, L. W., Kenworthy, N., \u0026amp; Bosire, E. N. (2025). Digital activism in Kenya: moving from the digital center to the digital periphery of Long Covid experience. \u003cem\u003eGlobalization and Health, 21\u003c/em\u003e(1), 33. doi:10.1186/s12992-025-01120-9\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMendes, K., Ringrose, J., \u0026amp; Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Women\u0026apos;s Studies, 25\u003c/em\u003e(2), 236-246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMundt, M., Ross, K., \u0026amp; Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media: The Case of Black Lives Matter. \u003cem\u003eSocial Media + Society, 4\u003c/em\u003e(4), 2056305118807911. doi:10.1177/2056305118807911\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMundt, M., Ross, K., \u0026amp; Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter. \u003cem\u003eSocial media+ society, 4\u003c/em\u003e(4), 2056305118807911.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNhedzi, A., \u0026amp; Azionya, C. M. (2025). The digital activism of marginalized South African gen z in higher education. \u003cem\u003eHumanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12\u003c/em\u003e(1), 362. doi:10.1057/s41599-025-04535-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOlajimbiti, E. O. (2025). Deontic Modality and Evaluation of Obligations in Children-related X (Twitter) Interactions. \u003cem\u003eCorpus Pragmatics, 9\u003c/em\u003e(3), 247-268. doi:10.1007/s41701-025-00188-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePage, S. (2019). \u0026ldquo;A machine masquerading as a movement\u0026rdquo;: The 2015 UK general election labour campaign investigated through assemblage and affect. \u003cem\u003ePolitical Geography, 70\u003c/em\u003e, 92-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.02.004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePapacharissi, Z., \u0026amp; Blasiola, S. (2015). Structures of Feeling, Storytelling, and Social Media. In (pp. 211-222).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePark, C. S. (2015). Book review: Manuel Castells, Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet Age. \u003cem\u003eMobile Media \u0026amp; Communication, 3\u003c/em\u003e(1), 146-147. doi:10.1177/2050157914550578a\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRanger, G. (2015). Karin Aijmer and Christoph R\u0026uuml;hlemann (eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. xviii + 461. \u003cem\u003eEnglish Language and Linguistics, 19\u003c/em\u003e(3), 544-552. doi:10.1017/S1360674315000234\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRangsarittikun, R. (2025). From (a)Wake to Woke to Anti-Woke: A Diachronic Analysis of the Evolution of Discourse About \u0026lsquo;Woke\u0026rsquo; Through the Hashtag #Woke on X. \u003cem\u003eCorpus Pragmatics, 9\u003c/em\u003e(3), 225-245. doi:10.1007/s41701-025-00189-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRichardson, B. J. (2020). \u003cem\u003eFrom student strikes to the extinction rebellion: New protest movements shaping our future\u003c/em\u003e: Edward Elgar Publishing.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoy, R. K. (2019). Online Activism, Social Movements and Mediated Politics in Contemporary Bangladesh. \u003cem\u003eSociety and Culture in South Asia, 5\u003c/em\u003e(2), 193-215. doi:10.1177/2393861719836296\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchneider, J. (2022). Chapter 9. Three German discourse particles as speech act modifiers. In A. Xabier, E. Arantzazu, \u0026amp; M. Sergio (Eds.), \u003cem\u003eDiscourse Particles\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 229-254): John Benjamins Publishing Company.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSearle, J. R. (1969). \u003cem\u003eSpeech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language\u003c/em\u003e: Cambridge University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShah, V., Sivitanides, M., \u0026amp; Mehta, M. (2013). The era of digital activism. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Information Technology, Communications and Convergence, 2\u003c/em\u003e(4), 295-307. doi:10.1504/ijitcc.2013.059409\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTerkourafi, M. (2012). Politeness and pragmatics. In K. Allan \u0026amp; K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), \u003cem\u003eThe Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 617-637). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTrnavac, R., \u0026amp; P\u0026otilde;ldvere, N. (2024). Investigating Appraisal and the Language of Evaluation in Fake News Corpora. \u003cem\u003eCorpus Pragmatics, 8\u003c/em\u003e(2), 107-130. doi:10.1007/s41701-023-00162-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVerschueren, J. (1997). \u003cem\u003eUnderstanding Pragmatics\u003c/em\u003e: Arnold.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou, Z., \u0026amp; Wang, D. (2023). Review of Models of Modals: from Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics to Machine Learning Ilse Depraetere, Bert Cappelle, Martin Hilpert, Ludovic De Cuypere, Mathieu Dehouck, Pascal Denis, Susanne Flach, Natalia Grabar, Cyril Grandin, Thierry Hamon, Clemens Hufeld, Beno\u0026icirc;t Leclercq and Hans-J\u0026ouml;rg Schmid, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin, 2023 (Hardback), ISBN: 978-3-11-073861-2. \u003cem\u003eCorpus Pragmatics, 7\u003c/em\u003e(3), 297-302. doi:10.1007/s41701-023-00150-1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Digital Activism, Corpus Pragmatics, Social Justice Movements, Speech Acts, Framing Strategies","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7980722/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7980722/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe present research project Adopts a corpus-based analytical prism to question the deliberate use of language by three prominent current social-justice movements: Black Lives Matter, Me Too and Extinction Rebellion. A series of intertwined questions are inquired in the inquiry: How do activists plan word selections with the aim to structure their grievances, achieve group solidarity, stimulate mass mobilization, and overcome digital barriers of censorship and governmental surveillance? To address these questions, the researcher demonstrates that activists regularly summon framing devices, politeness gambits, speech acts, and indirect signals in order to target diverse audiences seek both a collective identity and the means of promoting resistance to current regimes of power. Examples of timelines taken on social-media networks are examined to understand various rhetorical tactics in social awareness, namely punchy metaphors, visceral emotional cues, encompassing pronouns, and categorical commands to action, are used to represent the idea (or ideas) as well as to push reform in a certain direction. By bypassing algorithmic filters, activists use strategies such as irony, indirect phrasing, and euphemism, which enable their posts to remain accessible and widely shared across digital platforms. Overall, the findings lay pragmatic practices in the foreground as the driving force of online protest, as well as the node at which language, power and social change intersect in networked space. The findings add to the growing literature on corpus pragmatics and its contribution includes one that maps the pragmatic functions that are performed in digital activism. They also furnish a facts-based narrative of discourse which gives consideration to the special motivations and opportunities of digital protest. In the conclusion, the paper provides recommendations on the future research, cues on new platforms to study and new techniques of resistance to focus on to abate the extremely fast development of the nature of digital activism.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Pragmatic Strategies in Digital Activism: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Language Use in Social Justice Movements","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-11 11:48:40","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7980722/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"bfd779c3-4d68-46b3-b476-4995bec09a2d","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-03T07:08:44+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-11 11:48:40","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7980722","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7980722","identity":"rs-7980722","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}